*05050905* 0505/0905

V Semester 3 Yr. LL.B./IX Semester 5 Yr. B.A.LL.B./ B.B.A. LL.B.

Examination, December 2016
OPT – IV : COMPETITION LAW
Duration : 3 Hours Max. Marks : 100

Instructions : 1. Answer Q. No. 9 and any five of the remaining questions.

2. Q. No. 9 carries 20 marks and the remaining questions
carry 16 marks each.
3. Answer should be written either English or Kannada
completely.

Q. No. 1. Explain the salient features of MRTP Act, 1969. Marks : 16

Gí. BÅ. q. ². PÝÀá¨æ 1969ÃÜ ÊÜááS ÆPÜÒ|WÜÙÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔ.
Q. No. 2. Discuss the salient features of Federal Trade Commission Act. Marks : 16
ÓÜí¿ááPܤ ÊݱÝÃÜ ¯ÁãàWÜ PÝÀá¨æ¿á ÊÜááS ÆPÜÒ|WÜÙÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔ.

Q. No. 3. What are the agreements that are restricted under Competition
Act 2002 ? Discuss Marks : 16
ÓÜ ³ « ÝìñÜ ¾ P Ü PÝÀá¨æ , 2002 ÃÜ Aw¿áÈÉ ¿ÞÊÜ JvÜ í ŸwPæ W Ü Ù Ü ® Ü á °
¯Ðæ à —ÓÜ Ç ÝX¨æ ? aÜbìÔ.

Q. No. 4. Discuss the procedure for enquiry under Section 19 of

Competition Act, 2002. Marks : 16
PÜÆí 19 Óܳ«ÝìñܾPÜ PÝÀá¨æ , 2002ÃÜ Aw¿áÈÉ CÃÜáÊÜ ËaÝÃÜOÝ
±ÜÅQÅÁá¿á®Üá° aÜbìÔ.
Q. No. 5. Explain the duties and powers of Director General under
Competition Act, 2002. Marks : 16
Óܳ«ÝìñܾPÜ PÝÁ᪙, 2002 ÃÜÈÉ væçÃæPÜrÅ g®ÜÃÜDž AÊÜÃÜ A—PÝÃÜ ÊÜáñÜá¤
PÜñÜìÊÜÂWÜÙÜ ŸWæY aÜbìÔ.

P.T.O.
0505/0905 -2- *05050905*
Q. No. 6. Critically evaluate Competition Act, 2002. Marks : 16
Óܳ«ÝìñܾPÜ PÝÀá¨æ 2002®Üá° qàPÝñܾPÜÊÝX ±ÜÄàQÒÔ.
Q. No. 7. Narrate the distinction between MRTP Act of 1969 and
Competition Act of 2002. Marks : 16
Gí. BÅ. q. ². PÝÀá¨æ 1969 ÊÜáñÜᤠÓܳ«ÝìñܾPÜ PÝÀá¨æ 2002 ÃÜ
®ÜvÜá訆 ÊÜÂñÝÂÓÜÊÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔ.
Q. No. 8. Write short note on any two of the following : Marks : 2×8=16

D PææÙÜX®Ü GÃÜvÜPæR q±Ü³~ ŸÃæÀáÄ.

a) Regulations of Combinations
ÓÜí¿ááPܤWÜÙÜ ¯¿áíñÜÅ|
b) Rectification of Orders
B¨æàÍÜWÜÙÜ ÓÜıÜwÓÜáËPæ
c) Haridass V. All India Float Glass Mfrs. Association and
others. (AIR 2002 SC 2728)
ÖÜĨÝӅ V. BDž Cíw¿Þ ´æäÉàp… WÝÉӅ ÊÜÞ®Üá±ÝÂPÜcÃÜÅÕ
AÓæãàÔÁáàÐÜ®… Aív… A¨ÜÅÕ.
Q. No. 9. Solve any two of the following problems : Marks : 2×10 = 20

D PæÙÜX®Ü GÃÜvÜá ÓÜÊÜáÓæÂWÜÙÜ®Üá° ŸWæÖÜÄÔ.

a) ‘A’ died in an accident. ‘A’s wife claimed from the Insurance
Company, which refused her claim, stating that the driver
had no driving licence at the time of accident. A’s wife
contends that there is deficiency in service from the
Insurance Company. Whether her argument is acceptable
– Advice.
"A' GíŸ ÊÜÂQ¤¿áá A±Ü[ÝñܨÜÈÉ ÊÜáÃÜ| Öæãí©ÃÜáñݤ®æ. BñÜ®Ü
ÖæívÜ£¿áá ËÊæá PÜí±Ü¯¿áÈÉ ËÊæá ÖÜ|PÝRX AiìÓÜÈÉÓÜáñݤÙæ, B¨ÜÃæ
B Aiì¿á®Üá° ËÊæá PÜí±Ü¯¿áá aÝÆPÜ®Üá ±ÜÃÜÊݯWæ Öæãí©ÆɨÜ
PÝÃÜ|PÝRX AÊÜÙÜ Aiì¿á®Üá° £ÃÜÓÜRÄÓÜáñܤ¨æ. "A'®Ü ÖæívÜ£¿áá C¨Üá
ËÊÜÞ PÜí±Ü¯¿á ÓæàÊÝ Çæãà±ÜÊÝX¨æ Gí¨Üá ÊÝ¨Ü ÊÜÞvÜáñݤÙæ. AÊÜÙÜ
ÊݨÜÊÜ®Üá° J±Ü³ŸÖÜá¨æà ? ¯|ìÀáÔ.
*05050905* -3- 0505/0905
b) The Police have been harassing street hawkers, who sell
fruits on the Public roads. The street hawkers associations
approach the court condemning the Act of Police as violative
of their fundamental rights under Article 19(1) (g) of the
Constitution. Decide.
ÓÝÊÜìg¯PÜ ÃÜÓæ¤WÜÙÜÈÉ ÖÜ|á¡WÜÙÜ ÊÜÞÃÝo ÊÜÞvÜᣤÃÜáÊÜ ¹à©
ÊݱÝÄWÜÚWæ ±æäàÈÓÜÃÜá QÃÜáPÜáÙÜ ¯àvÜᣤ¨ÜªÃÜá. ¹à© ÊݱÝÄWÜÙÜ
ÓÜíZÊÜâ ±æäàÈÓÜÃÜ D PÜêñÜÂÊÜ®Üá° SíwÔ ÓÜí˫ݮܨÜw¿áÈÉ ±ÜÄaæfà¨ÜÜ
19 (1) (g) Aw¿áÈÉ ñÜÊÜá¾ ÊÜáãÆ»ÜãñÜ ÖÜQR®Ü EÆÉíZ®æ¿ÞWÜáñܤ¨æ
Gí¨Üá ±ÜÅΰԨÜÃÜá. £àÊÜÞì¯Ô.
c) ‘A’ trust establishes an Educational Institution with Social
objects and does not charge any fee from the students. The
State govt. sends the D.E.O. for inspection to the School.
The management challenges it under Article 19(1)(g)
contending that it is not business, but imparting education
to the poor people, and the State can’t interfere in its affairs.
Decide.
®ÝÂÓÜ ÓÜíÓæ§Áãí¨Üá ÓÝÊÜÞiPÜ E¨æªàÍÜ©í¨Ü ÎPÜÒ| ÓÜíÓæ§Áãí¨Ü®Üá°
Óݧ²Ô¨Ü᪠˨ݦìWÜÚí¨Ü ¿ÞÊÜâ¨æà ÍÜáÆRÊÜ®Üá° ÓÜíWÜÅ×ÓÜᣤÆə. ÃÝgÂ
ÓÜÃÜPÝÃÜÊÜâ ñܱÝÓÜOæWÝX w. C. K. ÃÜ®Üá° PÜÚÔñÜá. BvÜÚñÜ ÊÜáívÜÚ¿áá
ñÝ®Üá ŸvÜg®ÜÄWæ ÎPÜÒ| ¯àvÜᣤ¨Ü᪠ÓÜíË«Ý®Ü¨Ü A®Üáaæfà¨Ü 19 (1) (g)
ÃÜw¿áÈÉ C¨Üá E¨æãÂàWÜÊÜÆÉÊæí¨Üá £ÚÓÜáñݤ ÃÝgÂÊÜâ ÊÜÂÊÜÖÝÃܨÜÈÉ
ÖÜÓܤPæÒà±Ü ÊÜÞvÜÆá ŸÃÜáÊÜâ©ÆÉÊæí¨Üá ¯ÆáÊÜâ ñæWæ¨ÜáPæãíw¨æ.
¯|ìÀáÔÄ.

________________