Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Donald Baker
Professor De Gruy
ENG 1101
23 March 2020
The Soviet Union is a controversial subject matter. Within its former borders, opinions
can be mixed – depending on who you ask – due to its controversial, populist communist
political ideology. Surprisingly, the Washington Post reported that a Levada poll found over 50%
of polled Russian citizens see the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 as regrettable[ CITATION
Taylor \l 1033 ]. Even today, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF), seen as the
main opposition party in the Russian Federation, received around 17% of the national
presidential vote in 2008 and 2012, and 10% in 2018 (Central Election Commission of the
Russian Federation). Obviously, however, that still leaves a little under 50% of the population
that disagree with this sentiment, and support is still strong for Vladimir Putin and the United
Russia party, even though election results are very much rigged in his favor (Carbonnel).
Supporters of the Soviet Union will often point to current economic instability, a lost sense of
belonging and increased difficulty in communication with and travel to loved ones as reason for
regret, whereas detractors will point to economic instability at the time of dissolution, current
economic stability from higher oil prices, and a subsequent seeming decline in economic and
For supporters, the economic stability of the Soviet Union was best represented from the
Stalin to Brezhnev eras, as this was when the centralized economy was the strongest and before
Baker 2
certain market reforms led to economic instability despite early success. Lessening control of the
private sector did lead to a more rapid increase in economic growth from consumer goods.
However, these newly developed private firms had to obtain funding without the help of the
government despite the government maintaining their price controls on commercial goods,
making their success highly unstable and economic management frustrating. Many of these firms
ended up needing government subsidies to keep from going under, which further stressed the
economy (Keller). After the dissolution of the USSR, a market economy was fully instated, but
this only caused the wealth disparity to grow. As a result, many Russian citizens felt left behind
by their government. This led to a lack of feeling of belonging, which is felt to this day by over
40% of polled Russian citizens. Also, the succession of states from the Soviet Union and the
subsequent increase in their border patrol initiatives has made travel to and communication with
For detractors, the decline of the Soviet Union’s economic stability at the time of its
dissolution is due to a natural progression of centralized planning. The USSR’s central planning
initiatives were too ambitious and put too much stress and confusion on the economy’s growth.
A liberalization of the economy was needed to boost economic growth again. The early success
of Khrushchev’s market reforms is seen as evidence of this, and its co-existence with a
centralized economy is impossible (Keller). Oil was also less expensive during the Gorbachev
era in the 1980’s, as Ronald Reagan encouraged Saudi Arabia to gouge their prices, making it
harder for the Soviets to make any money off their oil supply. This ended after the Soviet Union
dissolved, with oil prices reaching record highs under Putin’s administration (Deffeyes). This is
widely cited as a reason for Russia’s relative economic prosperity in recent years despite their
large wealth gap, and this boosted Putin’s widespread support (Vodovozov). Lastly, the
Baker 3
transition to a market economy and the abolishing of the one-party state of the USSR is taken as
evidence of a democratization of Russian society from what it was, as political repression of non-
communists and certain minorities under the USSR was rampant. However, 10 potential rival
political parties are banned from elections and presidential elections are largely rigged in Putin’s
In conclusion, there are several reasons why a former Soviet citizen might take either side
of this debate, but its safe to say that it largely depends on who they are. Lower class citizens and
non-historically oppressed minorities would most likely feel more bitter about the USSR’s
dissolution than a higher-class citizen or oppressed minority. Many Russians may also have a
more complex view of the issue, as it is a complex issue with many factors. Then, there are those
who are simply apathetic, feeling that not much in the way of political repression has changed
following the change in state ideology. Even in the last election, 40% of Russian citizens did not
vote (Carbonnel). Questions like these are seemingly nonsense, preferring to save any energy
that would be seemingly wasted on politics for their own personal existences.
Works Cited
Taylor, Adam. “Why Do so Many People Miss the Soviet Union?” The Washington Post, WP
Baker 4
www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/12/21/why-do-so-many-people-
miss-the-soviet-union/.
www.vybory.izbirkom.ru/region/izbirkom.
Carbonnel, Alissa de. “Russian Communists Win Support as Putin Party Fades.” Reuters,
Thomson
communists-win-support-as-putin-party-fades-idUSTRE7B40KL20111205.
in-the-kremlin-how-to-change-the-economy.html?pagewanted=1.
Deffeyes, Kenneth S. Beyond Oil: the View from Hubberts Peak. Hill & Wang Publishing, 2006.
Britannica, Inc.,
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Banned_political_parties_in_Russia.