Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Exchange
Leading drastic change at
investment banks
Contents
Foreword 3
Section 1 4
Enhancements investment banks have made to
their foreign exchange control environment
Section 2 10
Improvements to foreign exchange service offering
by investment banks
Section 3 11
Activities investment banks are focusing on to improve
their foreign exchange control environment
Section 4 12
The tough choices investment banks are facing
Contacts 14
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the following individuals for their contribution:
We have collaborated with many But this transformation is not completed EY is appropriately positioned to
investment banks on this topic and, yet. We expect that investment banks will support investment banks through their
although significant and drastic changes be focusing on five main topics: transformation. We have experience in
have been achieved, there is still some working with more than 25 investment
1. Formalizing their progress by explicitly
way to go. banks, ranging from backward-looking
adopting the new FX Global Code
investigation work into misconduct and
Indeed, investment banks have already 2. Enhancing efficiencies across their new forward-looking remediation of front-
achieved a significant amount of change control and risk management approach office controls. This experience has
in the last five years across four main
3. Reinforcing the accountability of allowed us to develop unique assets and
dimensions. They have:
the front office and removing the approaches that can support the change.
• Changed their control approach to new unnecessary duplication across the These include:
types of risk (e.g., conflicts of interest). three lines of defense
• EY Conflicts of interest register
• Clarified and defined their new 4. Ensuring that the new approach
• EY Control standards (based on
expectations with regard to culture is implemented globally across all
industry practices, regulatory
and conduct. business units and principles are
requirements and the FX Global Code)
• Adapted their policies and extended to asset classes (beyond FX)
• EY Surveillance service for FX: OdyssEY
procedures to new regulation and 5. Systematically leveraging the use of
client expectations. information to improve the detection of • EY Traceability and control services
• Simplified their business model and abnormal situations and behaviors • EY Risk and control management
control environment by increasing the framework
level of trading automation. This has a cost both financially and
emotionally; but it is the only way to fully
restore the confidence of clients and
shareholders, as well as gaining
new market share.
Pierre Pourquery
Partner, Ernst & Young LLP, London
1
Global Foreign Exchange Committee, FX Global Code, https://www.globalfxc.org/fx_global_code.htm
To manage the most critical conduct risks, Most investment banks have defined Investment banks that trade in FX barrier
investment banks have implemented policies and procedures to enable fair options have enhanced their business
detailed bank-wide policies and FX markups to be applied to client orders. guidance to include details on how to
business guidance that cover the following These are supported by detailed threshold execute barrier-related orders, associated
aspects related to managing benchmark criteria for escalation, evidencing hedging activities, order thresholds
orders: management review for audit trail for escalation and requirements for
purposes and the need to be truthful to monitoring by the desk supervisor.
• Defined approach to trading during the
clients when asked about the amount of
fixing calculation window
markup applied. PA Dealing
• Prohibitions on the types of information
that can be shared All investment banks have enhanced
We have seen examples across a number
existing order handling policies and
• How netting of fixing orders should of investment banks of existing personal
business guidance. Examples of
be conducted account dealing frameworks being
enhancements include how FX sales and
• Execution method enhanced to provide sales and trading
trading should handle client orders, the
with further clarity on what they can
• Thresholds for reporting and escalation types of orders that will be accepted, the
and cannot trade and thresholds on
types of disclosures that can be made
the amount individuals can trade in FX
Communications to clients (e.g., pre-hedging) and how to
per month.
manage conflicts of interest (e.g., two
All investment banks have either of the same client orders, or managing
enhanced existing or implemented internal and external stop loss orders).
new policies and guidance on business
expectations when communicating with
clients and competitors, including the
types of information and market color that
can be shared both internally within the
investment bank and externally to clients,
counterparties and competitors, and the
types of chat rooms that sales and trading
can participate in.
A majority of investment banks have • Enhanced business training across the • Implementation of tactical surveillance
strengthened their existing governance front office that includes a balanced mix to manage manipulating FX benchmark
and supervision frameworks in order to between classroom- and online-based fixes, which is the number one conflict
provide sufficient oversight of business training. for FX businesses and has contributed
risks and activities. Key governance • Delivery of business training by to an increase in surveillance budgets
improvements that have typically been desk supervisors and senior by 50%.
implemented include: business management. • In addition to the surveillance of FX
• FX business forums for FX business • Specific scenario-based training on benchmark fixes, investment banks
management, desk supervisors and FX business activities that are are also focusing their surveillance
other infrastructure groups (e.g., considered to be “grey areas” to investment on the following five FX
legal and compliance) in which key strengthen front-office awareness and business risks:
FX business risks are reviewed and understanding of expectations. • Layering and/or wash trades
discussed, with follow-through actions • Increasing focus on the supervisor in • Stop Loss
documented. promoting conduct and identifying • Front Running
• Defined supervisory processes, inappropriate behaviors in a timely
• Hard mark ups
including procedures that outline manner (some investment banks have
supervisory expectations when introduced training for supervisors on • FX barrier option monitoring
providing desk oversight. risk culture). • To support their surveillance
• Ensuring escalation channels are • Frameworks to build the understanding capabilities, they have hired former
clearly defined, documented and of culture and improve the monitoring FX traders to provide specialist
communicated to the business of behavior. knowledge within their surveillance
(in some cases, these are supported • Evidenced examples of the impact of and control functions when conducting
by an online management tool to enable good and bad employee conduct on surveillance activities.
the routing of escalation to supervisors end-of-year performance ratings and,
and evidence the steps taken to reach ultimately, the remuneration package
a resolution).
• Monitoring of written communication is • All investment banks have changed • We have observed significant
well established, with more than half of aspects of their business model in order investment from investment banks
investment banks monitoring more than to manage conflicts of interest that are since 2010 (around US$1b in total
80% of their written communication. inherent within their FX business. for the industry globally) across the
• To support the implementation of new following activities:
• Our industry comparison has identified
electronic communication policies the following key changes: • Implementation of a conflicts of
and business guidance, most have interest framework by the front office
• More than 75% of investment banks
undertaken the following activities:
have automated their fixing and non- • Enhanced business practices in
• Introduced procedures for monitoring fixing orders. response to FX settlements
and processes for the ongoing review
of lexicon flags based on trigger • Slightly less than 50% have • Embedded controls delivered as part
implemented a fee-based model of business-as-usual activities
events, e.g., FX industry focus
for certain order types (e.g.,
• Implemented comprehensive first • From a recent survey conducted by
fixing orders).
and second line of defense monitoring EY, we estimate that investment banks
of communications • One of the benefits of this trend is have spent more than US$500m over
the reduction in some critical risks two years to assess and remediate
• Review of control breaches and other
and conflicts of interest (e.g., by front-office controls in response to
issues in a monthly control forum
limiting discretion and access to FX settlements.
• Introduced electronic communication sensitive order information) while
steering or working groups to potentially limiting the need for
review the escalations from complex controls (e.g., reduced Most investment banks have
communication monitoring and
refine monitoring parameters,
population of transactional activity been developing tactical
subjected to surveillance
e.g., validation of lexicons and monitoring).
surveillance solutions to
• Challenges remain in the monitoring
manage the most critical
of voice channels. A number of conduct risks
investment banks have undertaken
proof of concepts with third-party IT
vendors that have not delivered desired
standards and expectations.
• At this point, a majority of investment
banks are undertaking a risk-based
sample approach when it comes to
monitoring voice channels, or reviewing
voice channels as part of an overall
suspicious transaction investigation.
8
Below, we have outlined a typical phased approach adopted by a Tier 1 investment bank.
Objectives Establish a framework, including Enhance controls across the Embed controls and ensure
identifying and mitigating front office through assessment ongoing controls are in line
conflicts and remediation delivery. with short term and long
of interest. term objectives.
US $500m
over two years to assess and
remediate front office controls in
response to the FX settlements
60%
M
ore than
Alignment with the FX Global Code. Improvement of surveillance and Extending the FX control environment
monitoring capabilities. to the rest of the investment bank.
Radically changing the three lines of Reducing the overall cost of control by Increasing preventative controls to
defense to make the control environment 50% while improving effectiveness. 50% of all controls.
more efficient and effective.
• Investment banks have had to be • Spending on control has been driven • So far, enhancements to preventative
reactive in enhancing and addressing by a “improve at any cost” approach to controls have taken the form of
gaps in controls; this has meant address gaps quickly. improvements to awareness, training,
repetition, overlap and even confusion • However, low returns, limited revenue management information and, in some
in ownership of control activity across growth and the resulting pressures on cases, considerations of behavior in
the traditional lines of defense model. return on equity have brought control remuneration and reward.
• Investment banks are beginning to spend under the spotlight. • However, regulators are actively
evaluate a “holistic activity-based • To date, much of the focus has been encouraging investment banks to go
approach” to control by defining on directive (procedures and guidance) further in addressing behavior and
key control activities required and and detective (e.g., surveillance and reward, and implement systems and
the standard to which they are to be monitoring) controls, often supported controls to prevent rather than detect
performed, and ensuring that activity by manual processes. While the control misconduct.
is executed by an appropriate team, activity so far has been crucial, its • Preventative system-based controls are
whether front office, compliance or effectiveness is still open to debate. likely to be more effective in addressing
operational risk. misconduct and also less costly to run
Now that a minimum standard has been
(greater automation and limited manual
achieved, the focus is on achieving greater
intervention).
value through increased automation,
reduced repetition and prevention. • However, improvements to control
without adequate consideration
of behavior may be expensive or
ineffective, or even worse, both.
First and second lines of defense reorganization EY digital solution for control and compliance
EMEIA
Pierre Pourquery Mark Selvarajan Rick Mangassarian
Partner Director Senior Manager
Ernst & Young LLP Ernst & Young LLP Ernst & Young LLP
London London London
+44 207 951 6750 +44 207 951 3441 +44 207 951 9066
ppourquery@uk.ey.com mselvarajan@uk.ey.com rmangassarian@uk.ey.com
Americas
Tom Campanile Michael Patterson Mary Lou Peters
Partner Partner Executive Director
Ernst & Young LLP Ernst & Young LLP Ernst & Young LLP
New York New York New York
+1 212 773 8461 +1 212 773 2824 +1 212 773 2941
thomas.campanile@ey.com michael.patterson1@ey.com marylou.peters@ey.com
APAC
David Scott Luke Shepherd
Partner Senior Manager
Ernst & Young Advisory Pte. Ltd Ernst & Young Advisory Services Ltd
Singapore Hong Kong
+1 65 6309 8031 +1 852 2849 9483
david.scott@sg.ey.com luke.shepherd@hk.ey.com
About EY
EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services.
The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence
in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop
outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our
stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better
working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities.
This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended
to be relied upon as accounting, tax or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors
for specific advice.
The views of third parties set out in this publication are not necessarily the views of the global EY
organization or its member firms. Moreover, they should be seen in the context of the time they
were made.
ey.com