0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
43 vizualizări1 pagină
The document summarizes a study on barriers to innovation in Macedonia's non-wood forest product (NWFP) sector. Through interviews with 36 company owners, the study identified three main barriers: institutions, with an inadequate legal framework and overlapping ministries; information, with a lack of informational resources; and informality, with irregular business practices. It recommends focusing on improving institutions through clearer rules, enhancing information sharing, providing financial instruments, and better integrating innovation and start-ups into sector policies to help realize the sector's potential for innovation.
The document summarizes a study on barriers to innovation in Macedonia's non-wood forest product (NWFP) sector. Through interviews with 36 company owners, the study identified three main barriers: institutions, with an inadequate legal framework and overlapping ministries; information, with a lack of informational resources; and informality, with irregular business practices. It recommends focusing on improving institutions through clearer rules, enhancing information sharing, providing financial instruments, and better integrating innovation and start-ups into sector policies to help realize the sector's potential for innovation.
The document summarizes a study on barriers to innovation in Macedonia's non-wood forest product (NWFP) sector. Through interviews with 36 company owners, the study identified three main barriers: institutions, with an inadequate legal framework and overlapping ministries; information, with a lack of informational resources; and informality, with irregular business practices. It recommends focusing on improving institutions through clearer rules, enhancing information sharing, providing financial instruments, and better integrating innovation and start-ups into sector policies to help realize the sector's potential for innovation.
Barriers for innovation in NWFP sector in Macedonia
PhD student Stojanovski Vladimir
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, BOKU Vienna
Introduction Methods Discussion / Conclusion
Goals: Integration of innovation in NWFP Inadequate legal framework (rulebook,
Macedonia – in transition period; licenses and permissions) and overlapping sector and identification of the Barriers for between two Ministries) Privatization of the NWFP sector; innovation Aim to join EU – harmonization of Unfair competition, Case study - innovation project part of MP legislation; Strong dependence of weather condition; Qualitative data Long tradition of utilization of NWFP Mature equipment and mechanization 36 interviews (semi-structured) with owners of companies (60% of the companies); Main financial source –own resources Content analysis of the main policy Innovation and start-ups not properly Possibility for rural population documents integrated in the policies
Results
• The final results identified three barriers:
History development of the companies; •Institutions; Innovative activities; • Information; Utilization of credit lines; •Informality (irregularity) , Challenges; Subvention; Recommendations Relevant policies; Implementation of innovation •Possibility for innovation exists – more Research Questions focus on institutions (rules of the game); •Improvement of the informational To what extend the innovations in NWFP instruments ; sector are integrated? •Provision of financial instruments; What are the hampering factors for •Integration of start-ups and innovation innovation in NWFP sector in Macedonia? in policies,
What are the roles of institutions and
actors? References • Rametsteiner, E., Weiss, G., Ollonqvist, P., Slee, B. (2011) COST Action E51 • Rametsteiner, E., Kubeczko, K., and Weiss, G., (2005) Innovation and entrepreneurship in forestry in Central Europe; European Forest Institute; Research Report 19, Joensuu • Weiss, G., and Rametstainer , E. (2005) The role of innovation systems in non-timber forest products and services development in Central Europe; Economic Studies XIV (1), pp. 23-36