Sunteți pe pagina 1din 249

Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM

913

1 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS


EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
2

3 RUSSELL S. FARIA, )

4 Appellant, )

5 vs. ) ED No. 100964

6 STATE OF MISSOURI, )

7 Respondent. )

9 IN THE LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI


FORTY-FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
10 JUDGE DAN DILDINE

11 STATE OF MISSOURI, )

12 Plaintiff, )

13 vs. ) Cause No. 12L6-CR001312

14 RUSSELL S. FARIA, )

15 Defendant. )

16

17 TRANSCRIPT ON APPEAL
2-20-13, 3-4-13, 5-21-13, 6-18-13,
18 7-2-13, 7-10-13, 10-28-13
11-18-13, 11-19-13, 11-20-13, 11-21-13
19 VOLUME 5

20

21 APPEARANCES

22 Ms. Leah Askey Attorneys for the Plaintiff


Mr. Richard Hicks
23
Mr. Joel Schwartz Attorneys for the Defendant
24 Mr. Nathan Swanson

25
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
914

1 Q. You think it was in the latter half of the

2 evening?

3 A. I think so.

4 Q. Okay. And you are saying that, at that point,

5 Russell didn't answer it?

6 A. I recall that he took his phone out and looked

7 at it, but whether he was looking at a call that had been

8 missed or he didn't answer or it was a text message, I have

9 no idea.

10 Q. Okay. You say his phone has a distinctive

11 tone. It's the Imperial March from Star Wars, correct?

12 A. Correct.

13 Q. I don't need to hum that. I think we are all

14 pretty familiar with that, right?

15 A. Yeah.

16 Q. What you are telling us is that the entire

17 night, you don't recall anybody else's cell phone going off?

18 A. No, I don't recall anybody else's cell phone

19 going off.

20 Q. Just Russ's?

21 A. Yes.

22 Q. You don't recall what anybody else may have

23 brought, whether they even brought their cell phone, correct?

24 A. That's correct.

25 Q. You assume that they did?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
915

1 A. I would assume so, but I didn't hear their cell

2 phones go off, so I can't be for sure.

3 Q. When the cell phone went off, was it the

4 Imperial March?

5 A. Yes.

6 Q. Okay. And Russell had a smart phone, correct?

7 A. I don't know. I've never been through his

8 phone but I assume so. He can choose his own ringtone, the

9 Imperial March. I would think it's a smart phone.

10 Q. So when you have, for instance, if you get an

11 e-mail, I mean, the Imperial song --

12 A. It very well could have been an e-mail?

13 Q. What I'm asking is, typically when you get an

14 e-mail, I mean, it's going to be like a -- the Imperial March

15 is going to be long for an e-mail, wouldn't it?

16 A. I don't know if I want to speculate on that. I

17 don't know his ringtone.

18 Q. You heard the Imperial March?

19 A. Yes. That's what I heard.

20 Q. It went off for a little bit until he was able

21 to touch it off.

22 A. It went on for a couple seconds, I believe.

23 Q. He looked at it and then put the phone away?

24 A. That's what I recall.

25 Q. And didn't call back?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
916

1 A. No.

2 Q. Sat there and continued to watch the movie a

3 little bit?

4 A. That's correct.

5 Q. Then, at some point, you say that he left?

6 A. Yes. He left minutes before Brandon and

7 Marshall did.

8 Q. He left shortly before they did?

9 A. Yes.

10 Q. Now this night, you were supposed to play Role

11 Master?

12 A. That was the standing tradition, yes.

13 Q. And you had to cancel the game?

14 A. Correct.

15 Q. Because Richard May had to work?

16 A. Yeah. I believe he had been called in a couple

17 of days before, so he had notified me and then I, in turn,

18 notified everybody else.

19 Q. You had notified everybody else previous to 6

20 o'clock that game is off?

21 A. Yes, I do believe I sent out a text message.

22 Q. Okay. And if game is off, did you also let

23 them know, but you are still welcome to come over, we could

24 watch a movie?

25 A. Yeah, I'm near positive because it's happened a


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
917

1 few times in the past where I'll let them know no game

2 tonight, you're more than free to come over and watch a

3 movie.

4 Q. And you said at 6 o'clock sharp you got the

5 movie in?

6 A. I actually believe I put it in a few minutes

7 before 6 o'clock, before everybody got there.

8 Q. By the time everybody -- you said the defendant

9 showed up first?

10 A. Yes.

11 Q. And then the other two individuals came?

12 A. Correct.

13 Q. And you guys sat down there and watched the

14 movie?

15 A. Yes.

16 Q. Okay. And I think I asked you back in the

17 summer, 18 months after this event, if you could recall where

18 everybody sat?

19 A. Yeah. I think I recall where everybody sat.

20 Q. Just like you testified here today. You

21 testified that -- specifically where you sat?

22 A. Yes, because I always sit in the same spot.

23 Q. Okay. Where Angie sat?

24 A. Yes.

25 Q. Where Brandon sat?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
918

1 A. Correct.

2 Q. Marshall and the defendant?

3 A. Correct.

4 Q. And if Richard had been there, I mean, this

5 wasn't a typical night because sometimes there would be six

6 people, right?

7 A. Correct. If Richard would have been there, we

8 actually would have been playing the game at my dining room

9 table instead of sitting in the living room.

10 Q. This wasn't something you did every Tuesday

11 night. It's movie night. Here's your place?

12 A. No. In fact, we're so ill-prepared to have

13 that number of people in my living room that Marshall had to

14 pull a chair from the dining room in.

15 Q. Okay. Yet, 18 months after the event, you can

16 remember specifically where everybody sat?

17 A. Yeah, because even to this day when we've had

18 to cancel things, that's pretty much the order we still sit

19 in, with the exception.

20 Q. You guys were smoking marijuana that night?

21 A. I can't say for sure, but I do believe so, yes.

22 Q. Okay. And everybody was just sharing a bowl, I

23 guess they call it, a pipe. A big pipe?

24 A. It would have been a small pipe but, yeah. And

25 it maybe would have gotten puffed on a couple of times. That


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
919

1 would have been about it.

2 Q. And you sat there and watched this movie,

3 enjoying a little bit of marijuana?

4 A. Sure.

5 Q. I'm not -- I'm just trying to set the stage

6 here.

7 A. Okay.

8 Q. Okay. But you don't recall anybody drinking

9 that night?

10 A. Not that I know of. I know that I drank

11 coffee. I think that Russell had some coffee, as well. I

12 make coffee every Tuesday night so.

13 Q. So he may have had coffee, but as you sit here

14 in your mind's eye and you can see where everybody is

15 sitting, you say you can see the defendant sitting in the

16 recliner?

17 A. Yes. He was on my right about eight foot away

18 from me.

19 Q. And on the recliner, if he was drinking --

20 A. It wasn't a recliner, by the way. It's just a

21 leather chair.

22 Q. Leather chair. In this leather chair, he may

23 have been drinking coffee?

24 A. Correct.

25 Q. But he wasn't sitting there drinking a big


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
920

1 bottle of tea?

2 A. I don't recall him bringing anything like that,

3 no. It's possible he could have, but I don't really pay that

4 minute attention to all of my friends so.

5 Q. Well, I think you said in your deposition that

6 it was 18 months before, so would it be difficult to remember

7 the -- let me get your -- (as read) "I believe, again, it's

8 really hard to remember 18 months after something that's as

9 trivial as that, you know".

10 A. That's correct. That's what I said in my

11 deposition.

12 Q. Right. But and so as trivial as somebody

13 drinking something, what they were drinking?

14 A. Yeah.

15 Q. But not as trivial as where they were sitting?

16 A. No. I can pretty much remember that.

17 Q. Okay. Trivial would be what they were drinking

18 or what they maybe had brought, but it's not trivial that

19 somebody's phone happened to have gone off that night?

20 A. No. Because his was the only phone that I can

21 recall actually ringing that night. And like I say, it's a

22 very distinctive ringtone. It's pretty obvious when his

23 phone goes off.

24 Q. The other thing is that you said there was very

25 little conversation that night?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
921

1 A. Maybe a paragraph's worth of conversation.

2 Q. Between all of you?

3 A. That's correct. Between all of us.

4 Q. Almost three hour period and there was almost

5 no talking?

6 A. That's correct. We were pretty much involved

7 in the movies. There were probably some comments made about

8 the movie, but nothing I can remember in particular.

9 Q. The only thing you can remember that night is

10 Russ's statement to you about maybe being able to get a new

11 motorcycle?

12 A. Yeah, he said he had talked with Betsy and that

13 they had decided to sell his old bike and, I believe, buy his

14 late uncle's bike.

15 Q. But you don't remember anything that Marshall

16 or Brandon may have said to you?

17 A. Honestly, I don't think they had a lot by way

18 of conversation that night. By the time they had showed up,

19 which was slightly after Russell, the movie was in full

20 swing. There was a lot of exciting stuff going on. We just

21 pretty much watched the movie.

22 Q. Okay. One more thing. When you do these

23 games?

24 A. Okay.

25 Q. Okay. You want to -- you gather with people


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
922

1 that you trust, right?

2 A. For the most part.

3 Q. I mean, it's just not some stranger that can

4 come in and get in this game?

5 A. I wouldn't have let somebody I don't trust in

6 my house.

7 Q. Right. So you trusted Russell Faria?

8 A. Correct.

9 Q. He was your friend?

10 A. Correct.

11 Q. And you had played these games that really

12 require camaraderie, friendship and trust, correct?

13 A. To a degree. I could probably play them with

14 somebody that is not my friend, but I certainly wouldn't

15 invite somebody that is not my friend into my house.

16 Q. And you are the individual who, though, ran the

17 game, correct?

18 A. Correct.

19 Q. And in the context of this game, the characters

20 -- because you are the referee, you are the Role Master,

21 right?

22 A. Referee, yeah.

23 Q. You are directing what they should do?

24 A. Correct. Well, I'm not directing what they

25 should do. I present them with a story. I describe the


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
923

1 settings to them and then they are free to act how they want,

2 go off on their own tangents. Whatever. I just present them

3 with the surrounding setting in the game.

4 Q. Thanks.

5 MR. HICKS: I don't have any further questions.

6 THE COURT: Mr. Schwartz?

7 REDIRECT-EXAMINATION

8 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

9 Q. Mr. Corbin, are you lying about Russell being

10 there from 6 o'clock to 9 o'clock that night?

11 A. Absolutely not.

12 MR. HICKS: Objection. It's argumentative and

13 self-serving. That's what the jury is going to determine.

14 THE COURT: Sustained.

15 Q. (By Mr. Schwartz) You don't remember if

16 Russell had something to drink, is what you testified to?

17 A. I don't recall. Although, I do suspect that he

18 had some coffee that night but.

19 Q. And as far as clothing, I think all you

20 testified to was you recall a hat?

21 A. Yeah. He wore a hat, I'm pretty sure, but he

22 wore a hat most places, so that wasn't out of the ordinary.

23 Q. But you are absolutely 100 hundred percent

24 certain he was there from 6 o'clock?

25 A. I can guarantee that between the hours of 6:00


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
924

1 and 9:00, Russell was sitting in my house and was no other

2 place than in my house next to the other four of us.

3 Q. All right.

4 MR. SCHWARTZ: I have nothing further.

5 THE COURT: State?

6 MR. HICKS: No Recross.

7 THE COURT: Thank you. May this witness be

8 released?

9 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, Your Honor.

10 THE COURT: Thank you, sir. You may be

11 released.

12 MR. SCHWARTZ: Your Honor, at this time I would

13 call Marshall Bach.

14 THE COURT: Marshall Bach.

15 MARSHALL BACH,

16 a witness, having been duly sworn by the Circuit Clerk to

17 tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so

18 help you God, under the pain and penalty of the Perjury Laws

19 of Missouri, testifies as follows:

20 THE COURT: You may proceed when you are ready.

21 MR. SCHWARTZ: Thank you.

22 DIRECT EXAMINATION

23 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

24 Q Would you state your name for the jury?

25 A. Marshall Bach.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
925

1 Q. Mr. Bach, how old a man are you?

2 A. I am 29.

3 Q. All right. Do you work?

4 A. Yeah.

5 Q. What do you do for a living?

6 A. I'm an auto mechanic.

7 Q. Where do you work?

8 A. Century Motors.

9 Q. How long have you been there?

10 A. Coming up on three years.

11 Q. Do you know Russell Faria?

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. Do you see Russell in the Courtroom?

14 A. Yes.

15 Q. All right. How long have you known Russell?

16 A. Probably for about that same timespan. Two to

17 three years.

18 Q. Two to three years. So if we go back to

19 December of 2011, you think you had known him for a couple

20 years then?

21 A. Maybe a year prior.

22 Q. Maybe a year. How do you know Russell?

23 A. Through friends.

24 Q. All right. Who would those friends be?

25 A. Brandon and Mike.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
926

1 Q. Brandon and Mike who?

2 A. Brandon Sweeney and Mike Corbin.

3 Q. All right. Where did you meet Russell?

4 A. Over at Mike's, I believe.

5 Q. Mike?

6 A. Corbin's. Sorry.

7 Q. In what context, how did it come about that you

8 met Russell?

9 A. Through our game night.

10 Q. Describe what is -- for the jury, tell these

11 people what game night is.

12 A. A group of us get together and play a role

13 playing game.

14 Q. What's that game called?

15 A. Role Master.

16 Q. How did you come to be in this clique to play

17 this game?

18 A. There was another guy, but he couldn't play

19 anymore so I took his spot.

20 Q. How did you hear about it? Who told you about

21 it?

22 A. Through my roommate, Brandon Sweeney.

23 Q. Was Brandon playing?

24 A. Yes.

25 Q. You asked if you could play?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
927

1 A. Yes.

2 Q. All right. Tell me how the game goes. Just

3 briefly, what's the game about?

4 A. Everybody has their own character and you run

5 around doing whatever.

6 Q. When you say you "run around", do you actually

7 leave the house?

8 A. No. No. Everybody sits at a table.

9 There's -- it's pretty much a board game. You have the

10 actual board on the table, little miniatures. Everybody has

11 their character sheets and everybody sits around the table.

12 Q. What was your role, if you recall, in 2011? Is

13 it different now?

14 A. Yeah. Yeah.

15 Q. Do you recall what it was December of 2011?

16 A. I believe my guy's name was "Devarius". He was

17 a weapons master.

18 Q. What does that mean? Does he hurt people?

19 A. I guess you could say his main thing, his most

20 knowledge was about, obviously, about weapons and battle.

21 Q. All right. Do you remember what Russell's

22 character was?

23 A. I believe he was a monk.

24 Q. All right. How about, do you recall what

25 Angelia's character was?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
928

1 A. Her name, I think she was an elf, I believe.

2 Q. All right. Is she still the same character or

3 do you know?

4 A. Yeah. In that game, yes.

5 Q. What about Mike? Does he have a character?

6 A. He pretty much runs the game, so he doesn't

7 have a specific one. He pretty much plays like townspeople,

8 whoever we run across through in our journey.

9 Q. Other than Tuesday game nights, have you ever

10 seen Russell socially?

11 A. A couple times.

12 Q. Where?

13 A. Up at Brandon's.

14 Q. At Brandon's?

15 A. Yeah. Sweeney's.

16 Q. Okay. And that would -- have you ever talked

17 to Russell on the phone?

18 A. No.

19 Q. Do you even know if you have his phone number?

20 A. I don't think I do.

21 Q. Now how long had you participated in the game

22 up until December of 2011?

23 A. Probably half a year to a year, I guess.

24 Q. So six months to a year?

25 A. Yeah.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
929

1 Q. Were you the newest game member?

2 A. Yes.

3 Q. All right. And did you enjoy it?

4 A. Yes. It's a lot of fun.

5 Q. Did you go every Tuesday?

6 A. Yes. Unless I was sick or had other plans.

7 Q. What would happen if you weren't there? Let's

8 say, was it always played every, was it played every Tuesday?

9 A. Yes.

10 Q. All right. Did somebody, what if somebody was

11 wasn't there? What would happen?

12 A. Then we would either sit around and watch a

13 movie or play cards. Usually, we just watched movies.

14 Q. Was there another game you could play if people

15 weren't there?

16 A. No, not really because you have to have

17 everybody there to play.

18 Q. All right. And this is the game you were

19 playing?

20 A. Yes.

21 Q. And what's the name of it?

22 A. Role Master.

23 Q. Do you still continue to play it?

24 A. Yes and no. We actually started a new game

25 because we're kind of hung up on the other one.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
930

1 Q. Have you seen or talked to Russell since

2 December 27th, 2011?

3 A. No.

4 Q. On December 27th, 2011, did you go to Mike

5 Corbin's house?

6 A. Yes.

7 Q. Did you see Russell there that night?

8 A. Yes.

9 Q. Do you recall what order you arrived in? Did

10 you get there before Russell, after Russell or do you know?

11 A. I believe after. He was there.

12 Q. He was there when you got there?

13 A. Yes. When me and Brandon Sweeney arrived.

14 Q. Did you and Brandon arrive at the same time?

15 A. Yeah. We rode together.

16 Q. Did you live nearby?

17 A. Yes.

18 Q. You and Brandon are roommates; is that correct?

19 A. Yes.

20 Q. Are you still roommates?

21 A. Yes.

22 Q. Now on this night, who else participates in

23 your game, generally?

24 A. Rich May.

25 Q. And?
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
931

1 A. Angelia. I don't know her last name.

2 Q. Okay.

3 A. And Mike. So it's just me, Brandon, Mike,

4 Angelia and Russ.

5 Q. Was Richard there that night?

6 A. No, he had to work.

7 Q. Did you play your game?

8 A. No, we did not.

9 Q. Why is that?

10 A. Because we didn't have the full party there to

11 play.

12 Q. Do you remember what Russell was wearing that

13 night?

14 A. The least I can recall is he had jeans and a

15 ball cap, but he always had a ball cap.

16 Q. Do you know what time he arrived? What time --

17 put it this way. If he was there before you, what time did

18 you arrive?

19 A. We arrived right about 6:00, 6:05-ish, I guess.

20 Q. And Russell was there?

21 A. Yes.

22 Q. What did you guys do?

23 A. We watched two movies that night.

24 Q. What did you watch?

25 A. "Conan the Barbarian" and "The Road".


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
932

1 Q. All right. Did you drink alcohol that night?

2 A. No, we did not.

3 Q. Did you smoke marijuana that night?

4 A. Yes, we did.

5 Q. Who is "we"? Did everybody?

6 A. Everybody.

7 Q. All right. A lot, a little?

8 A. A little.

9 Q. All right. And what did you smoke it from?

10 A. Out of a pipe.

11 Q. Okay. Did you watch both movies?

12 A. Yeah. Not all of "The Road".

13 Q. Why not?

14 A. Because it was boring. It's a terrible movie.

15 I don't recommend it.

16 Q. All right. So do you recall what time you

17 left?

18 A. Right about 9:00.

19 Q. All right. Was Russell still there when you

20 left?

21 A. He left 30 seconds to a minute before us.

22 Q. So you basically -- when you say "us", you and

23 Brandon left at the same time?

24 A. Yes, me and Brandon.

25 Q. And do you recall if Russell or if anyone got a


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
933

1 phone call that night?

2 A. I think he may have checked his phone, but I

3 vaguely, don't really remember.

4 Q. Admittedly, this is a couple years ago. You

5 don't know if he got a phone call or not?

6 A. It's hard to say, honestly.

7 Q. All right. Between the hours of 6 o'clock and

8 9 o'clock, approximately, on Tuesday, December 27, where were

9 you?

10 A. Over at Mike Corbin's.

11 Q. Who else was there?

12 A. Brandon Sweeney, Angela and Russ.

13 Q. When you say "Russ", Russ Faria?

14 A. Yes. Russ Faria.

15 Q. The individual you see in the Courtroom today?

16 A. Yes.

17 Q. Are you absolutely, 100 hundred percent certain

18 of that?

19 A. Yes.

20 Q. Any doubt in your mind?

21 A. No.

22 Q. Were you contacted the next morning by anybody?

23 A. Yes. Two Detectives came to the door.

24 Q. And did they ask you about where you were the

25 night before and who you were with?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
934

1 A. Yes.

2 Q. Did you tell them?

3 A. Yes.

4 Q. And did you tell them what you are testifying

5 to here today?

6 A. Yes.

7 Q. Were you then contacted again a few days later?

8 A. We were actually, me and Brandon, were actually

9 contacted that following Wednesday morning, Thursday evening

10 and then Saturday morning.

11 Q. So three times you were contacted by police?

12 A. Three times.

13 Q. Did you know the police were coming when they

14 showed up on Wednesday morning?

15 A. No.

16 Q. Did you know the police were coming when they

17 showed up on Saturday morning?

18 A. No.

19 Q. On Wednesday, did they interview you together

20 or separately from Brandon?

21 A. Together.

22 Q. Did they interview you together or separately

23 from Brandon on Saturday?

24 A. It was -- at the very beginning Thursday, I was

25 out getting food and when I came home they were already
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
935

1 there, so I would assume maybe a five, ten minute span of

2 time before I got there. So then together and together.

3 Q. What about Saturday?

4 A. They took everybody separately to different

5 police stations.

6 Q. And did you talk to them at length that

7 Saturday?

8 A. I'm sorry?

9 Q. Did you speak with them at length about what

10 you did and what your actions were off that previous Tuesday?

11 A. Yes. It was pretty much the same thing they

12 asked us the two previous times.

13 Q. Have you ever gone anywhere with Russell?

14 A. No.

15 Q. Have you ever been to his house?

16 A. No.

17 Q. Do you even know where his house is?

18 A. Somewhere out in Troy. That's about it.

19 Q. Have you ever met his wife, his kids?

20 A. No.

21 Q. Was there any conversation that you recall that

22 night?

23 A. No. It was a pretty bland night.

24 Q. A pretty ordinary night as far as you recall?

25 A. Yeah.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
936

1 Q. Anybody talking about anything specifically?

2 A. No.

3 Q. How do you know it was 9 o'clock when you left?

4 A. I remember looking at the clock in Brandon's

5 car when we left.

6 Q. Did you go anywhere?

7 A. Brandon dropped me off. He went to go get

8 food.

9 Q. For both of you?

10 A. No, just for him. I wasn't hungry.

11 Q. You didn't eat dinner there?

12 A. No.

13 Q. Did people generally have dinner there?

14 A. No. We don't eat over at Mike's.

15 Q. All right. Do you remember if Russell had

16 anything to eat there?

17 A. No. I don't believe he did.

18 Q. Do you know if he was drinking anything?

19 A. Maybe coffee that Mike had made.

20 Q. But that's all you recall?

21 A. Yeah.

22 Q. Okay. Again December 27, how do you remember

23 it was that day?

24 A. I don't know. I guess something like this

25 sticks with you when --


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
937

1 Q. Police came to see you the next morning?

2 A. Right.

3 MR. SCHWARTZ: I don't have any other

4 questions. Thank you, Marshall.

5 THE WITNESS: You're welcome.

6 THE COURT: State?

7 CROSS-EXAMINATION

8 BY MR. HICKS:

9 Q. Good morning, Mr. Marshall.

10 A. Good morning.

11 Q. Or Mr. Bach. I'm sorry.

12 Maybe I was confused, and I know it's not a big

13 deal, but back when you guys were playing the game together,

14 you actually went by the character "Oden"?

15 A. Yes. That's what it was, the most current

16 character.

17 Q. He was a sorcerer?

18 A. Right. That one is.

19 Q. Back then, at the time of the game when the

20 defendant was playing with you, Russell's character's name

21 was "Devarius"?

22 A. No. That was my character.

23 Q. Okay.

24 A. That was my old character.

25 Q. Okay. And that was right and that was -- you


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
938

1 were a weapons master?

2 A. Right.

3 Q. And then the defendant, he was a monk, but he

4 was a martial arts expert, correct?

5 A. Yes.

6 Q. Okay. And you had been playing the game quite

7 a while with these guys, correct?

8 A. Yeah.

9 Q. You considered them your friends, right?

10 A. Yeah.

11 Q. I mean, you don't want to play?

12 A. I'm not going to go and play with complete

13 strangers.

14 Q. Right. You did it on a weekly basis?

15 A. Yeah. Every Tuesday.

16 Q. This is something, again, on Tuesday evenings

17 where you guys were spending your time, enjoying a little bit

18 of marijuana?

19 A. Yeah.

20 Q. All right. And role playing, doing these games

21 where you guys go on missions and adventures, correct?

22 A. Yeah.

23 Q. Is it fair to say that, in some ways, you get

24 to know that person's character better than you know, better

25 than you know the real person?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
939

1 A. What do you mean?

2 Q. Well, for instance, the defendant here, did you

3 know that he was married?

4 A. Yeah, I did know he was married.

5 Q. All right. Did you know that his wife had

6 cancer?

7 A. I did not know that.

8 Q. Okay. Did you know if he had children?

9 A. I didn't know.

10 Q. Okay. That's what --

11 A. Okay. So yes, I guess I would know more the

12 character than the person.

13 Q. I'm not trying to be tricky here. I'm trying

14 to say, in this game situation, this is about the game,

15 correct?

16 A. Correct.

17 Q. And you get to know, you knew the defendant's

18 character as the monk, as this martial arts expert, better

19 than you knew the real person?

20 A. I guess so.

21 Q. Now I believe it's your testimony that you and

22 Brandon actually arrived at the, on that evening prior to the

23 defendant?

24 A. No. That was wrong. It was, he was there

25 before we got there.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
940

1 Q. So you believe that he was there before?

2 A. Yes.

3 Q. Do you remember providing a deposition to me, I

4 mean, not to me but taking a deposition this last summer when

5 you came into one of these rooms here --

6 A. Yeah.

7 Q. -- and I asked you questions?

8 A. Yeah.

9 Q. Okay.

10 MR. HICKS: Permission to approach. I'm sorry.

11 I'm looking at Page 28, Line 10.

12 THE COURT: You may.

13 MR. HICKS: Thank you.

14 Q. (By Mr. Hicks) I'm going to ask you to read

15 Line 10 and then my question, I mean, Line 9 is my question,

16 your response to yourself. Okay?

17 Now I know, again, we're going back a ways,

18 right?

19 A. Right. It's hard to remember a lot of this

20 stuff.

21 Q. I get it. But even just a few months ago when

22 you came back here, was your memory back then, was it not,

23 that you and Brandon actually showed up first then Russ

24 showed up?

25 A. Like I said, it's hard to remember.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
941

1 Q. I understand.

2 A. He, he might have been there. I don't know.

3 If any kind of timespan, it's minutes, though.

4 Q. I understand. But I guess the point I'm trying

5 to make is that back in the summer you said this. Now you're

6 saying, you know, your testimony this morning that you

7 believe that, that he was already there when you arrived,

8 correct?

9 A. Yeah.

10 Q. Yes? And since that time, since providing your

11 deposition a few months ago, you have continued to have this

12 game on Tuesday nights, correct?

13 A. Yes.

14 Q. You've continued to have interaction with Mike

15 Corbin, correct?

16 A. Yes.

17 Q. And your roommate, Brandon Sweeney?

18 A. Yes.

19 Q. And Mike's significant other, correct?

20 A. Yes.

21 Q. All right. And you guys actually all came down

22 here together this summer when you did your depositions,

23 correct?

24 A. Yeah. We rode separately but, yeah, we all

25 came --
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
942

1 Q. At the same time?

2 A. -- as a group.

3 Q. You kind of sat out there, right?

4 A. Yeah.

5 Q. Do you remember if the defendant was drinking

6 anything that night? And I'm not talking about alcohol. I

7 know you already talked about --

8 Everybody was smoking marijuana. We've

9 established that, right?

10 A. Yeah.

11 Q. You believe he was drinking coffee?

12 A. Yeah. Mike always made coffee on Tuesday

13 nights.

14 Q. So this is based upon habit it sounds like,

15 that he always made coffee on this Tuesday night?

16 A. Yeah.

17 Q. Do you actually remember the defendant drinking

18 coffee?

19 A. I'm pretty sure he had a cup.

20 Q. Did you see him with any big bottles of tea?

21 A. I don't recall any tea.

22 Q. Okay. Now you do recall where people were

23 sitting in there during the movie, correct?

24 A. Yeah, for the most part.

25 Q. Well, I'm just going back to your deposition.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
943

1 What is your memory today as in regards to who was sitting

2 where?

3 A. Okay. You've got the couch, the chair, another

4 chair. I was in the kitchen chair. I was the only one that

5 didn't have a nice chair.

6 Russ was in the single chair and then Mike,

7 Andge and Brandon were on the couch.

8 Q. So Mike, Andge and Brandon were on the couch.

9 You can remember because you didn't have a comfortable chair?

10 A. Yeah.

11 Q. But you remember the defendant was in the

12 leather chair, right?

13 A. Yeah.

14 Q. And that's what you told, that's what you said

15 a few months ago when you came in here and gave this

16 deposition, correct?

17 A. Yeah.

18 Q. But that was 18 months after the 27th; --

19 A. Yeah.

20 Q. -- correct? And you can remember exactly where

21 everybody was sitting?

22 A. I guess I can.

23 Q. Did anybody leave that room that night?

24 A. No.

25 Q. So you have a memory not just that, I was


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
944

1 careful about -- and I'm not talking about leaving the house.

2 It's your testimony that nobody that entire

3 three-hour period even got up and went out of the room,

4 correct?

5 A. Correct.

6 Q. Nobody got up and went to the bathroom, the

7 kitchen or anything?

8 A. Maybe Mike would go to the kitchen to get

9 another cup of coffee.

10 Q. Okay. But I believe your testimony back in the

11 summer was nobody got up even to go to the restroom?

12 A. No.

13 Q. Okay. It's your testimony here today that you

14 think you remember the defendant's cell phone going off?

15 A. Vaguely, yeah.

16 Q. Vaguely, you do remember that?

17 A. Yeah.

18 Q. When you leave the house, you guys, I think

19 it's your testimony that you basically left, you and Brandon,

20 who is your -- by the way, Brandon Sweeney, he's your

21 roommate, correct?

22 A. Yes.

23 Q. But you've known him since grade school, right?

24 A. Yes.

25 Q. He's one of your best friends?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
945

1 A. Yeah.

2 Q. And he's the one who got you involved in this

3 game?

4 A. Right.

5 Q. And to this day, you continue to be involved in

6 this game basically because of Brandon, right?

7 A. Yes.

8 Q. All right. And so that night when you left,

9 you basically, it's your testimony that you followed the

10 defendant out. You guys kind of all left at the same time?

11 A. Correct.

12 Q. Is that correct?

13 A. Yes.

14 Q. That you remember actually seeing his vehicle

15 pull away?

16 A. Right.

17 Q. Is that correct?

18 A. Yeah.

19 Q. And actually followed it down the street,

20 correct?

21 A. Yes.

22 Q. And you believed it was about what time?

23 A. I believe we left around the 9:00, 9:03 time.

24 Q. You said 9:03 because you said you looked at

25 Brandon's clock in his car and it's 9:03. That's how I


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
946

1 remember it, right?

2 A. Right.

3 Q. And so it takes you only about two or three

4 minutes to get home, right?

5 A. Correct.

6 Q. You said that Brandon was going to go to, I

7 think, Jack in the Box to get something to eat?

8 A. Yes.

9 Q. And in your deposition, you said that -- you

10 have been up to that Jack in the Box, right?

11 A. Yeah.

12 Q. And across the street is an Arby's, correct?

13 A. Yes.

14 Q. And you told me in the deposition that from

15 your house -- let me ask you this. How close, you said it

16 only took three minutes to get from Mike's house to your

17 house?

18 A. Right.

19 Q. You for a portion of that, you said you were

20 following the defendant in his vehicle?

21 A. Correct.

22 Q. He keeps going straight, you turn off into your

23 subdivision; is that correct?

24 A. It's the street off the main road, yeah.

25 Q. But it's only three minutes away?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
947

1 A. Correct.

2 Q. This Jack in the Box with this Arby's across

3 from it, you said from where you live it takes maybe ten to

4 15 minutes to get there; is that correct?

5 A. I guess it's closer to the five, ten minutes.

6 It just depends on how the lights are and the traffic and

7 people.

8 Q. Okay. Did your roommate get anything to eat?

9 A. Yeah, he went to Jack in the Box.

10 Q. I understand he told you he went to -- let me

11 ask you this. Did you see him return with food?

12 A. Yeah, when he got back.

13 Q. Did he have the bag with him?

14 A. Yeah.

15 Q. So he brought the bag with the food in it?

16 A. Yes.

17 Q. And ate it there in front of you?

18 A. Yeah.

19 Q. All right. And what did you guys do that

20 night? Just go to bed?

21 A. Pretty much.

22 Q. All right. So he eats his food and just goes

23 to bed?

24 A. Might have stayed up and watched a little T.V.

25 Q. You are saying that it was the next morning


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
948

1 that the police came?

2 A. Yes. Two Detectives.

3 Q. And where were you?

4 A. I was sleeping.

5 Q. And where was Brandon?

6 A. Sleeping.

7 Q. So they woke you up?

8 A. Yes.

9 Q. All right. Did you guys both speak, were you

10 both interviewed together?

11 A. Yes.

12 Q. Where at?

13 A. Inside.

14 Q. Inside where?

15 A. His house, Brandon's house.

16 Q. Okay. And do you remember that discussion at

17 all?

18 A. Vaguely. I guess. I mean, it was -- like I

19 said, this was all two years ago.

20 Q. I understand. Did the police ask you to do

21 anything, did they ask you or Brandon to do anything?

22 A. Do anything like what?

23 Q. Well, that's what I'm asking. I know they are

24 asking you questions about the night before, right?

25 A. Right.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
949

1 Q. Okay. And they are asking you where you were,

2 correct?

3 A. Yeah.

4 Q. Whether the defendant was with you?

5 A. Right.

6 Q. What you guys were doing?

7 A. Yeah.

8 Q. Right?

9 A. Okay. Yeah.

10 Q. At the end of it, did they say, hey, will you

11 do this for me? Will you get this piece of information or

12 will you go --

13 A. Oh, no. No.

14 Q. They didn't ask you to do anything; they just

15 got information from you?

16 A. Correct.

17 Q. Didn't tell you to keep a hold of anything?

18 A. No.

19 Q. Okay.

20 MR. HICKS: I don't have any further questions.

21 THE COURT: Mr. Schwartz?

22 MR. SCHWARTZ: Nothing further.

23 THE COURT: Thank you. May this witness be

24 released?

25 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
950

1 THE COURT: Thank you, sir. You are released.

2 MR. SCHWARTZ: Call Brandon Sweeney.

3 THE COURT: Brandon Sweeney. Mr. Sweeney,

4 would you please come forward and raise your right hand to be

5 sworn by the Clerk?

6 BRANDON MICHAEL SWEENEY,

7 a witness, having been duly sworn by the Circuit Clerk to

8 tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so

9 help you God, under the pain and penalty of the Perjury Laws

10 of Missouri, testifies as follows:

11 THE COURT: Thank you, sir. If would please

12 have a seat over here at the witness stand.

13 You may inquire when you are ready.

14 DIRECT EXAMINATION

15 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

16 Q. Would you state your name?

17 A. Brandon Michael Sweeney.

18 Q. And Mr. Sweeney, what do you do for a living?

19 A. I work for the new CMS. The Obamacare.

20 Q. Okay. Having some problems with that?

21 A. Well, I don't particularly deal with that part.

22 I just do the verification stuff. So me, personally, no. No

23 problems with it.

24 Q. Okay. How long have you been doing that?

25 A. I actually just started October.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
951

1 Q. Back in 2011, were you working?

2 A. Yes, sir.

3 Q. What did you do back then?

4 A. I worked for a Triple A affiliate. Pretty much

5 calling roadside assistance, renew memberships.

6 Q. Do you know Russell Faria?

7 A. Yes.

8 Q. Do you see Russell Faria in the Courtroom

9 today?

10 A. Yes, sir.

11 Q. Could you describe what he's wearing?

12 A. A suit and tie and glasses.

13 Q. When is the last time you saw Russell?

14 A. The night of December 27th, I would say.

15 Q. Okay. You haven't seen him or talked to him

16 since?

17 A. No, sir.

18 Q. How do you know it was that night?

19 A. Because it was right after Christmas and before

20 New Year's.

21 Q. All right. What was the occasion that you were

22 seeing Russell about? Why did you see Russell that night?

23 That was a terrible question.

24 A. Okay. Tuesdays we always get together and play

25 a game called Role Master. It's just a role playing game.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
952

1 Q. All right.

2 A. And that's what we were doing, usually to meet

3 up on Tuesdays.

4 Q. What does that mean a "role playing" game?

5 A. It's just pretty much you have little

6 miniatures on a mat and roll some dice and it just goes

7 throughout, like a story line.

8 Q. All right. Do you have characters?

9 A. Yes, sir.

10 Q. What was your character?

11 A. My character at the time -- I've had so many.

12 I want to say at the time was a half orc.

13 Q. What is a half orc?

14 A. A half human, half orc, if you have ever seen

15 Lord of the Rings. Just it's -- I don't know. It's kind of

16 hard to explain what an orc is.

17 Q. All right. So is this game sort of loosely

18 based on Lord of the Rings?

19 A. Sort of, yes.

20 Q. Was there somebody not there that particular

21 night?

22 A. Yes, sir.

23 Q. Did you play the game anyway?

24 A. No, sir.

25 Q. Why not?
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
953

1 A. Because it's kind of hard to continue the story

2 line when somebody is not there.

3 Q. As you testified to earlier, it's sort of like

4 a book. When you miss a main character, you can't continue?

5 A. Correct.

6 Q. Did you know prior to going there that night

7 that you weren't going to be playing?

8 A. I believe so, yes. I believe my --

9 Q. How did you know that?

10 A. My uncle told me he had to work that night.

11 Q. Who is your --

12 A. A couple days before that Tuesday.

13 Q. Who is your uncle?

14 A. Richard May.

15 Q. And how long have you known Russell?

16 A. I've known Russell for awhile now. I'd say

17 ten-plus years.

18 Q. All right. And how old are you?

19 A. I'm twenty-eight.

20 Q. All right. So you have known him since you

21 were in your teens?

22 A. Yes, sir.

23 Q. Longer?

24 A. I'd say probably, maybe 11, 12.

25 Q. And how did you become involved in this game?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
954

1 A. Pretty much I broke up with my girlfriend and

2 instead of moping around the house all of the time, my

3 friend, my uncle was always telling me stories of what was

4 going on in the game.

5 I kind of got interested and I went over there

6 one night and loved it. So I just joined up.

7 Q. And the uncle we're talking about is Richard

8 May?

9 A. Correct.

10 Q. And the particular evening we're talking about,

11 he wasn't there?

12 A. Correct.

13 Q. All right. Do you recall when that was, when

14 your uncle brought you to the game, how long before December

15 of 2011?

16 A. I want to say earlier that year, maybe

17 February, March, April. Somewhere in there.

18 Q. So you had been playing -- up to now, you had

19 been playing three years or so, four years?

20 A. Yes.

21 Q. At that point in time, it would have been about

22 a year?

23 A. Correct.

24 Q. And who else played on a regular basis?

25 A. It was me, Russ, my uncle Rich, Mike was the


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
955

1 game master and then Andge.

2 Q. Okay. And where did you live?

3 A. I lived at 8013 Oak Grove Court, O'Fallon.

4 Q. How far is that from Mr. Corbin's house?

5 A. Oh, less than, I'd say a half a mile, if even

6 that.

7 Q. Do you know where Russ lived?

8 A. At the time, no. I just know out in Troy.

9 Q. You had never been to his house?

10 A. No, sir.

11 Q. What sort of game was this? Was it a violent

12 game?

13 A. Sometimes. I mean, it's -- like I said, it's

14 kind of Lord of the Rings-style, so every once in a while

15 there would be a horde of Orcs that you would have to go kill

16 off because they were trying to raid the town and steal

17 whatever from the town, like goods or like special gems,

18 stuff like that. So every once in a while, yeah, it would

19 get a little violent.

20 Q. Who assigned the missions?

21 A. Mike.

22 Q. Did you ever actually leave to conduct a

23 mission?

24 A. No, sir.

25 Q. The game would stop and continue the next


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
956

1 Tuesday; is that correct?

2 A. Correct.

3 Q. What was the time that the game was usually

4 played on Tuesdays?

5 A. Usually, from 6:00 to 9:00.

6 Q. Was it pretty much a set time?

7 A. Yes.

8 Q. Pretty much every Tuesday?

9 A. Yes, sir.

10 Q. Had Russell missed recently?

11 A. Not that I'm aware of, no.

12 Q. Did he miss in November?

13 A. I could not recall if he missed November or

14 not.

15 Q. All right. On the, in December of 2011, you

16 said Richard wasn't there?

17 A. Correct.

18 Q. Did you go anyway?

19 A. Yes.

20 Q. What did you do when somebody wasn't there?

21 What sort of other things would you do?

22 A. We either would play like another card game or

23 watch a movie.

24 Q. What did you do that night?

25 A. That particular night, we did watch a movie.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
957

1 Q. Do you have any idea if you arrived first,

2 Brandon arrived first or Russell arrived first?

3 A. Russell did arrive first. He was there when me

4 and Marshall both arrived.

5 Q. And you and Brandon arrived?

6 A. Brandon?

7 Q. I'm sorry. You and Marshall arrived together?

8 A. Correct.

9 Q. Do you have any recollection as to what Russell

10 was wearing that night?

11 A. I want to say maybe blue jeans, a hat, maybe a

12 jacket. I can't really recollect exactly what he was

13 wearing.

14 Q. You don't have a specific recollection?

15 A. Not really. I know he was wearing a hat, for

16 sure. I want to say he was wearing blue jeans, and I know he

17 had a jacket because it was wintertime.

18 Q. Did you guys play in the summers?

19 A. Yes, sir.

20 Q. You played every Tuesday?

21 A. Yes, sir.

22 Q. All right. What time did you arrive that

23 night?

24 A. That particular night around 6:00, maybe 6:05,

25 6:10. Somewhere in there.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
958

1 Q. Do you have any -- do you know for sure?

2 A. For sure what time, no.

3 Q. Did anybody leave that night? When is -- what

4 movie did you watch first?

5 A. The first movie we watched was "Conan the

6 Barbarian".

7 Q. Did you watch a movie after that?

8 A. Yes, we did. We watched "The Road" after that.

9 Q. Did you watch both movies in their entirety?

10 A. "Conan the Barbarian", yes, to the entirety.

11 "The Road", no. It was kind of boring, so we just kind of

12 stopped watching it.

13 Q. What time did you leave?

14 A. 9:00, 9:03.

15 Q. I'm sorry?

16 A. Nine o'clock, 9:03. Somewhere in there.

17 Q. All right. Prior to the time -- at the time

18 you arrived at 6:00 or 6:05 to the time you left at 9 o'clock

19 or 9:03, did anybody leave that residence?

20 A. No, sir.

21 Q. You are absolutely certain of that?

22 A. Positive.

23 Q. Did Russell stay in that residence?

24 A. Yes, sir.

25 Q. Are you absolutely certain of that?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
959

1 A. A hundred percent.

2 Q. Do you recall if Russell left before you or

3 after you?

4 A. He left a little bit before me.

5 Q. What do you mean a "little bit"?

6 A. Thirty seconds to a minute.

7 Q. So you watched him leave?

8 A. Pretty much, yeah. It was pretty much -- we

9 were saying our goodbyes. Russell went out the front door.

10 Me, Marshall and Mike and Andge were saying our goodbyes and

11 seeing what maybe was going on this weekend. Then me and

12 Marshall left after that.

13 Q. Do you recall any conversation that evening?

14 A. What do you mean, exactly?

15 Q. Any discussion of any topics?

16 A. Not really. I can't recall. There might have

17 been like a UFC fight that weekend. I was seeing if maybe

18 they wanted to come down and watch it. That's about it. If

19 there was even that discussion.

20 Q. So there wasn't much talk. It was just

21 watching the movies?

22 A. Yeah.

23 Q. When you left, what did you do?

24 A. I left, went straight to my house, dropped

25 Marshall off and I went to Jack in the Box.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
960

1 Q. And that Jack in the Box was how far away from

2 where you were?

3 A. About a half mile.

4 Q. About a half mile. Are there lights in

5 between?

6 A. One.

7 Q. Now the next morning, did anybody show up at

8 your house?

9 A. The two Detectives. Yes, sir.

10 Q. And what did they want?

11 A. They just wanted to question me if Russ was

12 around us last night, the night before. Just stating that

13 Betsy passed away. They didn't really go into detail.

14 Q. Did you tell them whether or not Russ was

15 around there?

16 A. Yes.

17 Q. What did you tell them about that? Did you

18 tell them that Russ was there the entire evening?

19 A. Yes.

20 Q. Was that the truth?

21 A. Yes, sir.

22 Q. Did you talk to them about where you went

23 afterwards?

24 A. Yes, sir.

25 Q. Where was that? Jack in the Box?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
961

1 A. Jack in the Box.

2 Q. Did they tell you to keep anything?

3 A. Yes. They told me to keep the receipt that I

4 had because, luckily, I just crumbled it up and threw it in

5 the back seat.

6 The next morning when they came and got me, he

7 asked me to present the receipt in front of him. I went back

8 to my car, unwrapped it up and he said, go ahead and hold on

9 to that.

10 Q. Do you have a copy of it?

11 A. Yes, sir.

12 Q. You kept that this entire time?

13 A. Yes, sir.

14 Q. Where is it?

15 A. It's in my wallet.

16 Q. Could you pull it out of your wallet?

17 A. Yeah. There's the physical receipt. I made a

18 copy of it because I know the ink kind of fades over time.

19 (Defendant's Exhibit N marked for

20 identification.)

21 Q. (By Mr. Schwartz) Now when you were deposed

22 over the summer, Mr. Hicks asked you about this receipt and

23 you pulled it out of your wallet at that particular time?

24 A. Yes.

25 Q. That was the original receipt, correct?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
962

1 A. It was both the original and the copy.

2 Q. Could you take a look at what's been marked

3 Defendant's Exhibit N and tell us what that is?

4 A. Exhibit N. A copy of the receipt.

5 Q. All right. And what's the date on that

6 receipt?

7 A. December 27th, 2011.

8 Q. And what time does it show that you arrived at

9 the Jack in the Box?

10 A. 9:13 and 30 seconds.

11 Q. Did you do the drive-thru or did you go inside?

12 A. Drive-thru.

13 Q. Does that all show on the receipt?

14 A. Yes, sir.

15 Q. Does it show how much you paid?

16 A. Yes, sir.

17 Q. What did you do with the food?

18 A. I ate it.

19 Q. Did you eat it there or go home?

20 A. I went home and ate it.

21 Q. All right. Does that receipt accurately depict

22 your transaction from that particular evening?

23 A. Yes, it does.

24 MR. SCHWARTZ: Your Honor, I ask that

25 Defendant's Exhibit N be admitted into evidence.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
963

1 THE COURT: Any objection?

2 MR. HICKS: No.

3 THE COURT: Defendant's N is admitted.

4 Q. (By Mr. Schwartz) So when you talked to the

5 Detectives, did you show them the receipt that night?

6 A. Yes.

7 Q. Did you tell them about the receipt?

8 A. Yes.

9 Q. Were you interviewed again by the police?

10 A. Yes.

11 Q. First of all, did you know the police were

12 coming that morning?

13 A. I got a heads up. Marshall got a phone call

14 from Mike saying two Detectives were going to come up to the

15 house. No more than 20 seconds, not even that, they knocked

16 on the door.

17 Q. When did you talk to them again?

18 A. The following night.

19 Q. So Thursday night?

20 A. Yes.

21 Q. Were you and Brandon separated when you spoke

22 to the police on Wednesday?

23 A. Marshall?

24 Q. I'm sorry.

25 A. That's okay. Yeah, Marshall, I believe, went


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
964

1 into his room and I went into my bathroom.

2 Q. What about Thursday night?

3 A. I'm sorry. Wednesday morning, no, we weren't

4 separated. Thursday night, yes, we were separated.

5 Q. Were you contacted again by the police?

6 A. After that, just to maybe do like a buccal

7 swab. That was months later.

8 Q. Did you ever go to the police station?

9 A. No.

10 Q. So when you were interviewed the next day, it

11 was separate?

12 A. Correct.

13 Q. And did you tell the police on those two

14 occasions what you are telling this jury here today?

15 A. Yes.

16 Q. And on December 27th, from the hours of

17 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at night, was Russell Faria in your

18 presence?

19 A. Yes.

20 Q. That entire time?

21 A. Yes.

22 Q. Absolutely, 100 percent certain about that?

23 A. One hundred percent positive.

24 MR. SCHWARTZ: Nothing further.

25 THE COURT: State?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
965

1 MR. HICKS: Yes.

2 THE COURT: You may proceed when you are ready.

3 MR. HICKS: Thank you.

4 CROSS-EXAMINATION

5 BY MR. HICKS:

6 Q. Mr. Sweeney, did I hear you right that you said

7 that Mike Corbin called the next morning to give you guys a

8 heads up that the Detectives were coming?

9 A. Yeah. He was just saying that there were

10 Detectives that were going to come over and talk to us, yes.

11 Q. Did you answer the phone or did Marshall answer

12 the phone?

13 A. It was Marshall.

14 Q. It was Marshall. So you didn't take the phone

15 call from Mike Corbin?

16 A. No. That was pretty much how I got awoken was

17 Marshall knocking on my door saying, hey, Detectives are

18 going to come up and talk to us.

19 Q. Marshall didn't knock on your door and say,

20 hey, the Detectives are here?

21 A. No.

22 Q. He knocked on your door and said the Detectives

23 are coming?

24 A. Correct.

25 Q. All right. When you first took the stand and


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
966

1 you introduced yourself, I thought I you heard you refer to

2 this as, your testimony about "the night"? Did you use the

3 term "the night"?

4 A. I don't know if I did or not.

5 Q. When we're talking about the 27th, that

6 evening, that's the night that you are saying you were with

7 the defendant for that three-hour period, correct?

8 A. Correct.

9 Q. All right. You are good friends with the

10 defendant, right?

11 A. I wouldn't say good friends but know well of

12 each other, yes.

13 Q. Okay. Well, you have attended barbecues

14 together?

15 A. Correct.

16 Q. Gone on a canoe trip together?

17 A. Correct.

18 Q. You have known him for at least eight years?

19 A. Uh-huh.

20 Q. And in fact, one of his good friends, Richard

21 May, is related to you, correct?

22 A. Correct.

23 Q. And how are you related to Richard?

24 A. He's my uncle.

25 Q. He's your uncle. So how old are you?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
967

1 A. I'm 28.

2 Q. You are 28, and the defendant, I think, is in

3 his early 40s?

4 A. I have no clue.

5 Q. But he's quite a bit older than you?

6 A. Correct.

7 Q. He's not even of your same age group?

8 A. Correct.

9 Q. So you have known him since 19, 20 years of age

10 through your uncle?

11 A. Correct.

12 Q. Okay. And you became actively involved in

13 almost a weekly basis back in 2009 with playing these role

14 playing games, correct?

15 A. Correct.

16 Q. Now to beat the dead horse about Role Master,

17 I'm not going to go into that. I'm going to ask you about a

18 different game, okay?

19 A. Okay.

20 Q. Tell me about Talisman. How is that game

21 played?

22 A. Talisman?

23 Q. Talisman.

24 Q. Pretty much you have a card that states your

25 character. There's a big game board and you have got a


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
968

1 little miniature that you -- there's three different sectors.

2 There's an outside level and a middle level and

3 then an inner level, and the goal of game is to get to the

4 inner level and win.

5 Q. Okay. So is that another type of role playing

6 game?

7 A. In a sense, yeah.

8 Q. Less so than the Role Master?

9 A. Yes. Role Master is straight 100 percent role

10 playing game.

11 Q. Yeah, because you are being imaginative and

12 creative there?

13 A. Correct.

14 Q. The rules of the game Talisman dictate more, --

15 A. Correct.

16 Q. -- is that fair?

17 A. Yes.

18 Q. It sounds like, as opposed to Role Master,

19 Talisman, if you were missing a person, not a big deal,

20 correct?

21 A. Correct.

22 Q. Kind of like playing Risk or something, two to

23 four, six players, whatever?

24 A. Correct.

25 Q. And so you knew on the 27th that your Uncle


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
969

1 Richard was not going to be able to be there?

2 A. Correct.

3 Q. So you knew that you weren't going to be able

4 to play Role Master, correct?

5 A. Correct.

6 Q. But there was talk about playing Talisman?

7 A. Correct.

8 Q. In fact you sent, you and the defendant

9 exchanged at least a couple of texts that day about, hey, is

10 game still on tonight? Maybe we play Talisman, correct?

11 A. Correct.

12 Q. And I think around 5:57 p.m., you actually sent

13 him a text saying, hey, are you going to show up, Talisman,

14 question mark. Correct?

15 A. Correct.

16 Q. But you guys didn't play Talisman?

17 A. No.

18 Q. You watched a movie?

19 A. Correct.

20 Q. One of them you said was quite boring?

21 A. Correct.

22 Q. Now "Conan the Barbarian", you had seen that

23 movie before, hadn't you?

24 A. The new one?

25 Q. Yes.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
970

1 A. No. At that time, that's the first time I had

2 ever seen it.

3 Q. The first time you had seen it. Others had

4 seen it before, hadn't they?

5 A. I'm not aware if they had or not.

6 Q. So you guys decided, instead of playing game on

7 game night -- you could have played Talisman, correct?

8 A. We could have, yeah.

9 Q. You decided not to and to just watch this

10 movie?

11 A. Yeah.

12 Q. Okay. I want to ask you a little bit about

13 this receipt. Where is it?

14 A. Right here.

15 Q. Thank you. I couldn't see it over the ledge.

16 A. That's all right.

17 Q. This is the actual receipt?

18 A. Uh-huh.

19 Q. That's faded. I get it.

20 A. Correct.

21 Q. Now I believe it was your testimony that that

22 night after you got your Jack in the Box, all right, that you

23 crumpled up the receipt and threw it in the back; is that

24 correct?

25 A. Yes, sir.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
971

1 Q. That would be this receipt right here --

2 A. Uh-huh.

3 Q. -- that you crumpled up and through in the

4 back? Okay.

5 Then the next morning, you get the heads up

6 that the Detectives are coming, correct?

7 A. Uh-huh.

8 Q. And it's your testimony that they told you at

9 some point during the interview to retrieve this receipt?

10 A. Yes. They asked if I still had the receipt and

11 I said, yes, I still do. Would you like me to go get it?

12 And the Detective said, yes.

13 Q. So you went out to your vehicle?

14 A. Uh-huh.

15 Q. Grabbed this crumpled receipt?

16 A. Uh-huh.

17 Q. Came back, right?

18 A. Yes, sir.

19 Q. But you didn't give it to them?

20 A. I asked him if he wanted it. He said he didn't

21 need it. He told me to hold onto it.

22 Q. Okay. I'm just confused here. You are telling

23 us he asked you to go get it?

24 A. Correct.

25 Q. But then when you brought it back in, he didn't


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
972

1 want it?

2 A. No. He just looked at it.

3 Q. He just looked at it?

4 A. Uh-huh.

5 Q. And told you to keep it?

6 A. Yes, sir.

7 Q. Okay. That's what you did, correct?

8 A. Exactly.

9 Q. In fact you made a copy of it?

10 A. Uh-huh.

11 Q. Because you knew it might fade?

12 A. Correct.

13 Q. And this last summer, you were -- you provided

14 a deposition, correct?

15 A. Correct.

16 Q. Now prior to that deposition, we had never

17 talked, correct?

18 A. No.

19 Q. You had talked to the defense attorneys?

20 A. Yes.

21 Q. Okay. And you had this receipt?

22 A. Yes.

23 Q. You never turned it over to them?

24 A. No.

25 Q. Okay. Now I think it was characterized in


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
973

1 the Direct Examination that I asked you about the

2 receipt?

3 A. Correct.

4 Q. Well, how would I have known about the receipt?

5 A. I have no clue.

6 Q. Yeah. Me either, because I'm going ask you to

7 look at Page 20, okay, of the deposition, Line 15.

8 I want you to read to yourself 15 down through

9 25. In fact, read to yourself all the way to the next page

10 through Line 8, okay? Just to yourself.

11 Okay?

12 A. Okay.

13 Q. Do you have any qualms with that question and

14 answer there?

15 A. No.

16 Q. Okay. Did I ask you specifically about the

17 receipt?

18 A. No.

19 Q. No. Okay. In fact, wasn't one of my questions

20 (as read), "All right. You guys just went back to your

21 place?"

22 Do you remember me asking you about that?

23 A. Uh-huh.

24 Q. Talking about, this is after you left Mike

25 Corbin's?
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
974

1 A. Uh-huh.

2 Q. And you said (as read), "I dropped him off",

3 and I guess you are referring to Marshall?

4 A. Correct.

5 Q. "And then I went to Jack in the Box", right?

6 A. Correct.

7 Q. (As read) "QUESTION: You went to Jack in the

8 Box?" Do you remember that?

9 A. Huh-uh.

10 Q. And your response (as read), "Yes. Do you need

11 a receipt or anything?"

12 A. Correct.

13 Q. "I kept the receipt. The Detective told me to

14 go ahead and keep it just in case."

15 So my question (as read), "No. I wouldn't have

16 thought of keeping the receipt. You had the receipt back

17 then? Yeah. I still have it."

18 And that's when you got it out of your, isn't

19 it at that point, that's when you got it out of your wallet

20 and you say, "Here. I've got a copy"?

21 A. Yes, sir.

22 Q. That's the first time you've ever turned it

23 over to any kind of authority?

24 A. Correct.

25 Q. So I didn't ask you about the receipt, correct?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
975

1 A. No.

2 Q. There was nothing in my question that indicated

3 I even knew that you had a receipt?

4 A. No.

5 Q. That anybody knew you had receipt?

6 A. Correct.

7 Q. Everybody was smoking marijuana that night,

8 correct?

9 A. Correct.

10 Q. Do you remember where everybody was sitting?

11 A. Yes, sir.

12 Q. Tell me.

13 A. It was Mike, Andge, me, Marshall and a pull up

14 chair and then Russell like in a sofa chair, sofa seat.

15 Something like that.

16 Q. Anybody drinking anything?

17 A. Not that I remember, no.

18 Q. Okay. Any specific conversations that stands

19 out to you?

20 A. The only one conversation I remember before we

21 started really getting into the movie was Russ mentioning

22 that he convinced Betsy to be able to get rid of his bike to

23 get a new one from his uncle, I believe.

24 Q. So in that three-hour period, the only

25 conversation that you can remember is about this bike?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
976

1 A. Correct.

2 Q. And nobody left the room?

3 A. No, sir.

4 Q. Even to go to the bathroom?

5 A. Not that I remember but.

6 Q. Okay. But you do remember Russ's phone going

7 off at least one time?

8 A. Yes.

9 Q. And that he didn't answer it?

10 A. Correct.

11 Q. He looked at it?

12 A. Correct.

13 Q. And then put it away?

14 A. Correct.

15 MR. HICKS: I don't have any further questions.

16 Well, maybe I do.

17 THE COURT: Mr. Schwartz?

18 Q. (By Mr. Hicks) You are familiar with -- you

19 have been around Russ for eight years?

20 A. Yes, sir.

21 Q. He was a smoker, correct? I'm not talking

22 about smoking marijuana. I'm talking about he would smoke

23 cigarettes?

24 A. Every once in a while, yeah, I remember seeing

25 him smoke cigarettes.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
977

1 Q. You've been on barbeques and canoe trips?

2 A. To be honest with you, I really can't remember

3 if someone was smoking cigarettes. I mean, I remember him

4 every once in a while smoking a cigarette here and there.

5 Q. I'm just curious because you said there was a

6 three-hour period where nobody got up and left. Usually

7 smokers want to go take a smoke break if they're not smoking

8 in the house.

9 A. Right. I think Mike allows people to smoke in

10 his house.

11 Q. Okay. If there was any smoking going on, it

12 would have been in the house?

13 A. They would have been sitting right there, yes.

14 MR. HICKS: Nothing further.

15 THE COURT: Mr. Schwartz?

16 REDIRECT EXAMINATION

17 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

18 Q. Brandon, this receipt the officer told you to

19 keep, nobody asked you about it until Mr. Hicks actually

20 brought up the fact, or you brought up the fact that summer,

21 last summer that you went to Jack in the Box?

22 A. Correct.

23 Q. And you kept the receipt, Defendant's Exhibit

24 N, because why?

25 A. The Detective told me to.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
978

1 Q. And that receipt states that you arrived at

2 Jack in the Box at 9:13 and 30 seconds on December the 27th

3 of 2011, correct?

4 A. Correct.

5 Q. Is there an Arby's across the street from

6 there?

7 A. Yeah. Not directly across the street. Maybe,

8 you could see it from Jack in the Box, yes.

9 Q. All right. And again, Russell was with you, in

10 the same room with those other people you talked about, from

11 6 o'clock to 9 o'clock on Wednesday, or Tuesday, December 27,

12 2011?

13 A. Yes, sir.

14 MR. SCHWARTZ: Nothing further.

15 THE COURT: State?

16 MR. HICKS: One Recross.

17 RECROSS-EXAMINATION

18 BY MR. HICKS:

19 Q. Again, I know you just said, again, for that

20 three-hour period he was with you. It's also your testimony

21 that you left basically at the same time?

22 A. Yes, sir.

23 Q. And that you got in your vehicle and you were

24 driving?

25 A. Yes, sir.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
979

1 Q. And that you remember it was 9:03?

2 A. Yes, sir.

3 Q. Because I remember hearing something about your

4 mind working on something, was it, 9:03, 9:06?

5 A. Multiples of three.

6 Q. Whatever. But that's the reason you can

7 remember 9:03?

8 A. Yes, sir.

9 Q. You are following the defendant out?

10 A. Correct.

11 Q. Do you remember what color his vehicle was?

12 A. I mean it, it -- I want to say. I can't really

13 remember what exact color it was. Blue-ish. Green-ish.

14 Maybe had some tan trim pieces.

15 Q. Do you remember me asking you that question in

16 your deposition?

17 A. Yes, sir.

18 Q. Okay. Do you remember what you told me back

19 then?

20 A. After I read my deposition, yeah.

21 Q. Okay. What color did you tell me it was in

22 your deposition?

23 A. I think I said it was brown.

24 Q. A brown?

25 A. A brown Blazer, maybe, I said.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
980

1 Q. Right. But today you are saying dark blue.

2 Dark?

3 A. Yeah, a dark blue-ish, green-ish. Like I said,

4 it has brown, tan trim pieces.

5 Q. You weren't talking about trim back then.

6 A. No.

7 Q. You were talking about it was a tan vehicle?

8 A. Right.

9 Q. Now you are saying today that it was dark; and

10 you read over your deposition, right?

11 A. Correct.

12 Q. Is that because you found out actually that his

13 vehicle was in fact dark or not tan?

14 A. No. He had two vehicles. I remember a long

15 time ago, like I said, I've known Russell for a long time, he

16 did have a brown Chevy Blazer. He also had a PT Cruiser and

17 then he had another SUV.

18 Q. I understand he may have had other vehicles.

19 I'm talking about your memory, your recollection of that

20 night, because mine works in digits of three; 9:03. I'm

21 being exact. Following this guy out and you in the

22 deposition you said it was a tan Blazer?

23 A. Right.

24 Q. Now you are saying it's dark?

25 A. Correct.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
981

1 Q. That's because, in fact, you found out he drove

2 a dark Blazer, correct?

3 A. It's not a Blazer, but, yes.

4 Q. I mean a dark color vehicle?

5 A. A SUV.

6 Q. And not a tan vehicle?

7 A. Correct. But like I said, the trim pieces were

8 tan itself. That's what my eye might have caught.

9 MR. HICKS: Nothing further.

10 THE COURT: Mr. Schwartz?

11 FURTHER REDIRECT EXAMINATION

12 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

13 Q. After you left Mike's, you didn't go straight

14 to Jack in the Box, did you?

15 A. No.

16 Q. Where did you stop?

17 A. I stopped at my house.

18 Q. Why?

19 A. To drop off Marshall because he didn't want to

20 have any food.

21 Q. And then you went to Jack in the Box?

22 A. Correct.

23 Q. And you arrived there at 9:13 or at least you

24 ordered your food at 9:13?

25 A. Correct.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
982

1 MR. SCHWARTZ: Nothing further.

2 THE COURT: Thank you. State?

3 MR. HICKS: Nothing further.

4 THE COURT: May this witness be released?

5 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes.

6 THE COURT: Thank you, sir. You may be

7 released.

8 THE WITNESS: Thank you.

9 MR. SCHWARTZ: At this time we call Angelia

10 Hulion.

11 MS. ASKEY: May we approach?

12 (Off the record discussion at the bench.)

13 ANGELIA MARIE HULION,

14 a witness, having been duly sworn by the Circuit Clerk to

15 tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so

16 help you God, under the pain and penalty of the Perjury Laws

17 of Missouri, testifies as follows:

18 THE COURT: Thank you. If you would please

19 have a seat over here on the witness stand.

20 You may proceed when you are ready.

21 DIRECT EXAMINATION

22 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

23 Q. Would you please state your name for the

24 record?

25 A. Angelia Marie Hulion.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
983

1 Q. Angelia, could you move up a little bit so we

2 can hear you? Stay close to the microphone.

3 State your name once more.

4 A. Angelia Marie Hulion.

5 Q. How old are you Angelia?

6 A. Forty.

7 Q. Where do you live?

8 A. In O'Fallon, Missouri.

9 Q. Who do you live with?

10 A. Michael Corbin.

11 Q. How long have you and Mike been together?

12 A. Oh, 20 years.

13 Q. Do you guys have a child?

14 A. Yes.

15 Q. All right. What do you do for a living?

16 A. I work for the Clean Uniform Company.

17 Q. How long have you been doing that?

18 A. Sixteen years.

19 Q. Same company?

20 A. Yes.

21 Q. Do you know Russell Faria?

22 A. Yes, I do.

23 Q. Do you see Russell?

24 A. Yes, I do.

25 Q. What is he wearing?
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
984

1 A. He's right there.

2 Q. How long have you known Russell?

3 A. Fifteen years.

4 Q. Do you socialize with Russell?

5 A. Very little.

6 Q How often do you see him? Well, have you seen

7 him just since December 27th of 2011?

8 A. No.

9 Q. Have you spoken to him since that date?

10 A. No.

11 Q. That was a Tuesday?

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. What did you normally do on Tuesday evenings?

14 A. Tuesday evenings we would get together and play

15 games.

16 Q. When you say "we", who is "we"?

17 A. Brandon, Marshall, myself, Michael, Russell,

18 Richard.

19 Q. All right. And Richard who?

20 A. May.

21 Q. And of all of those individuals you just named,

22 there's six people?

23 A. Yes.

24 Q. And what did you guys do?

25 A. That -- Tuesdays? Normal Tuesdays?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
985

1 Q. What you did you do on a normal Tuesday?

2 A. Played games.

3 Q. What kind of games?

4 A. Role playing games, board games.

5 Q. All right. Was there a particular game that

6 you were playing at the time, a role playing game?

7 A. At the time we were playing Role Master.

8 Q. All right. Did you have a character?

9 A. Yes.

10 Q. What is your character?

11 A. My character was a half elf female.

12 Q. All right. Did you play it -- do you recall

13 Russell's character?

14 A. Yes. He was a monk, I believe.

15 Q. How long had he been that character, if you

16 recall?

17 A. I think we played several years.

18 Q. So he had been a monk for several years?

19 A. Yes.

20 Q. Were you that half elf character for several

21 years?

22 A. Yes, I was.

23 Q. How long had you been playing that game with

24 Russell?

25 A. The same, about three or four years.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
986

1 Q. All right. Did new members join your group

2 within the past year?

3 A. Before that. Before that they did.

4 Q. Let's say --

5 A Before Russell.

6 Q. All right. Before Russell, then, who joined

7 after Russell?

8 A. After Russell we had Marshall join.

9 Q. All right. Did someone join after Marshall?

10 A. No.

11 Q What about Brandon?

12 A. Brandon was in before Marshall.

13 Q. Oh, Brandon was in before Marshall?

14 A. Yes.

15 Q. And then Marshall and Brandon, do they reside

16 together?

17 A. Yes.

18 Q. They are roommates?

19 A. Yes, they are.

20 Q. Okay. Why did you play it that particular

21 night?

22 A. That particular night, Richard May had to work

23 late, I believe, and he wasn't going to come. So we just

24 decided not to play.

25 Q. Who makes that decision?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
987

1 A. Well, usually we just make that decision. If

2 someone is not going to, then we all decide not to play.

3 Q. And this is pretty much a standard thing on

4 Tuesday nights?

5 A. Yes.

6 Q. What times do you play on Tuesdays?

7 A. Around 6:00 to about 9 o'clock.

8 Q. All right. That particular Tuesday, do you

9 recall what time, did anybody deviate from the normal time?

10 A. Normal time? No.

11 Q. Did Russell show up that night?

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. Do you have a recollection as to what Russell

14 was wearing that evening?

15 A. Oh, I only remember a ball cap and jeans.

16 Q. All right. You don't remember what kind of

17 shirt he had on?

18 A. A T-shirt, I believe.

19 Q. Did he show up before or after Brandon and

20 Marshall, if you recall?

21 A. He showed up first.

22 Q. All right. And what did you guys do?

23 A We, Michael and I were already watching a

24 movie.

25 Q. What was the movie?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
988

1 A. "Conan the Barbarian".

2 Q, How do you remember that?

3 A. How do I remember that? I've only talked about

4 it, I guess, five or six different occasions now, so it's

5 pretty stuck in my mind.

6 Q. Did you watch another movie that night?

7 A. We started to watch another movie.

8 Q. Do you recall that movie?

9 A. "The Road".

10 Q. Do you remember that for the same reason?

11 A. Yes.

12 Q. Did you finish watching the movie "The Road"?

13 A. No.

14 Q. Why not?

15 A. It was getting late and everyone seemed to be

16 tired and bored with it so.

17 Q. All right. Did you have anything to drink that

18 night?

19 A. No, I didn't.

20 Q. Were people drinking alcohol?

21 A. No.

22 Q. Was there some marijuana smoked?

23 A. Yes, a little.

24 Q. All right. If you recall, what was it smoked

25 out of?
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
989

1 A. A pipe.

2 Q. All right. Did you smoke?

3 A. I did.

4 Q. Did Russell?

5 A. I believe so.

6 Q. Do you know if everyone else did, as well?

7 A. I would assume. I did not, I wasn't

8 watching --

9 Q. You weren't paying attention?

10 A. -- so I don't know.

11 Q. Do you recall any specific conversations that

12 night?

13 A. The only conversation I recall is a little

14 about Christmas. Everyone asking how was Christmas, so

15 forth.

16 Q. Was that just when people arrived?

17 A. Yes. Pretty much.

18 Q. No other specifics?

19 A. No, not really.

20 Q. All right. And what time did people leave that

21 night?

22 A. About 9 o'clock.

23 Q. All right. Did anyone leave during the hours

24 of 6 o'clock to 9 o'clock?

25 A. Oh, no.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
990

1 Q. Absolutely, positively certain about that?

2 A. I am certain. Everyone was in the same room

3 the whole time.

4 Q. No doubt in your mind?

5 A. No doubt whatsoever.

6 Q. Did Russell Faria ever leave that residence

7 between 6 o'clock and 9 o'clock on December 27, 2011?

8 A. No, sir. Not until 9:00.

9 Q. And were you then approached or contacted the

10 next morning?

11 A. Yes, the next morning.

12 Q. By whom?

13 A. Detectives, I believe.

14 Q. Did they ask you some of the questions that I'm

15 asking you now?

16 A. Yes.

17 Q. Did you tell them -- what did you tell them?

18 A. Basically the same thing. He came over around

19 6:00 left around 9:00.

20 Q. Did you talk about the game and why you played

21 or why you couldn't play it, I mean?

22 A. I think they asked us what we did and we told

23 them we watched movies. We didn't discuss playing games.

24 Q. Did you tell them who else was there?

25 A. Yes.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
991

1 Q. Did you include Brandon and Marshall?

2 A. Yes.

3 Q. Did you include Russell?

4 A. Yes.

5 Q. And were you then reinterviewed a few days

6 later?

7 A. Yes, on Saturday.

8 Q. Now that first interview on Wednesday morning,

9 were you interviewed together or separately from Michael?

10 A. Together with Michael the first time.

11 Q. All right. And the second time?

12 A. The second time, separately.

13 Q. Were you taken anywhere to be interviewed?

14 A. Chesterfield.

15 Q. Police station?

16 A. The police station, uh-huh.

17 Q. Were you interviewed individually?

18 A. Uh-huh, yes. Separate vehicles, separate

19 rooms.

20 Q. Did you talk to the police at length on that

21 Saturday morning?

22 A. Yes.

23 Q. And did they ask you the details that we're

24 going over now?

25 A. Yes.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
992

1 Q. Did you tell them those details?

2 A. I told them everything they asked.

3 Q. And did that include from 6:00 p.m. to

4 9:00 p.m. on that Tuesday, the 27th, that Russell was in the

5 same room with you?

6 A. Yes.

7 MR. SCHWARTZ: I have nothing further.

8 THE COURT: State?

9 CROSS-EXAMINATION

10 BY MR. HICKS:

11 Q. How do you say your last name? I'm sorry.

12 A. Hulion.

13 Q. Ms. Hulion, do you know the defendant? You've

14 known him for quite a while, correct?

15 A. Yes.

16 Q. You knew him primarily through your husband,

17 not your husband but your common-law husband?

18 A. Yes.

19 Q. Mike Corbin, correct?

20 A. Uh-huh.

21 Q. And that's because you guys have been playing

22 games for a long time?

23 A. Yes.

24 Q. All right. Now prior to even you all playing

25 the games together, Mike has been playing these role playing
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
993

1 games for a long time, correct?

2 A. I believe since he was a child.

3 Q. All right. And since you have been with him,

4 which has been how long?

5 A. Twenty years.

6 Q. What kind of role playing games does he play?

7 A. Various different role playing games. War

8 Hammer, Role Master, Shatter Zone. Rifts. I can list --

9 I mean, they are all basically role playing games.

10 Q. A lot of role playing games?

11 A. Yes, science fiction role playing games.

12 Fantasy.

13 Q. Fantasy and science fiction?

14 A. Yes.

15 Q. Did you ever play Dungeons and Dragons?

16 A. We did many years ago.

17 Q. Okay. That night of the 27th, can you tell me

18 where everybody was sitting?

19 A. I believe Michael, Brandon and myself were on

20 the couch. Russell was in the chair across from me and

21 Marshall had his own chair.

22 Q. Okay. And besides smoking marijuana, nobody

23 was drinking alcohol?

24 A. No.

25 Q. Was anybody drinking anything?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
994

1 A. I believe we usually have coffee made.

2 Q. Coffee?

3 A. Probably coffee.

4 Q. Probably coffee. And do you recall that Russ

5 received the, the defendant received one phone call that

6 night, correct?

7 A. His phone went off.

8 Q. You recall his phone went off that night?

9 A. Yes.

10 Q. One time?

11 A. Yes.

12 Q. And that he looked at it and then put it away?

13 A. Yes.

14 Q. But you don't recall exactly what time that

15 was?

16 A. I do not.

17 Q. Okay. And I know you were asked about

18 conversations and you said there was maybe some talk about

19 Christmas because this was only two days after?

20 A. Yes. Yes.

21 Q. But it's also true the one conversation you

22 remember is about Russ talking about this motorcycle that he

23 possibly was going to buy, correct?

24 A. Yes. That was in the beginning along with

25 Christmas.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
995

1 Q. I understand.

2 A. It was part of that conversation.

3 Q. But other than that, you don't remember any

4 other conversations?

5 A. There weren't really -- We were just watching a

6 movie.

7 Q. Just watching a movie for three hours together?

8 A. Basically. I mean, most of them hadn't seen

9 the movie so.

10 Q. You had?

11 A. Yes.

12 Q. And Mike had?

13 A. Yes.

14 Q. Okay. And you could have played another game?

15 A. We could have.

16 Q. I mean, there was talk about playing Talisman,

17 wasn't there?

18 A. No. We didn't discuss playing any games that

19 night.

20 Q. You didn't discuss any --

21 A. No.

22 Q. Maybe playing a different game?

23 A. No.

24 Q. Because Talisman wouldn't have required six

25 people?
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
996

1 A. No, it doesn't. Role playing game doesn't

2 either.

3 Q. Well, except that it becomes difficult because

4 you have got to have the characters out.

5 A. We have to have an established group, right.

6 Yes.

7 Q. Right. This established group is a group that

8 met on a weekly basis in your house?

9 A. Uh-huh.

10 Q. And you would consider -- these were a group of

11 friends?

12 A. I would consider them friends, yes.

13 MR. HICKS: I don't have any further questions.

14 Thank you.

15 MR. SCHWARTZ: I have nothing further, Your

16 Honor.

17 THE COURT: Thank you. May this witness be

18 released?

19 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, Your Honor.

20 THE COURT: Thank you, ma'am. You may be

21 released.

22 Do you want to approach?

23 (Off the record discussion at the bench.)

24 THE COURT: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury,

25 at this time we are going to break for lunch.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
997

1 The Court again reminds you of what you were

2 told at the first recess of the Court. Until you retire to

3 consider your verdict, you must not discuss this case among

4 yourselves or with others or permit anyone to discuss it in

5 your hearing. You should not form or express any opinion

6 about the case until it is finally given to you to decide.

7 Do not do any research or investigation on your

8 own about any matter regarding this case or anyone involved

9 with the trial. Do not communicate with others about the

10 case by any means. Do not read, view or listen to any

11 newspaper, radio, electronic communication from the Internet

12 or television report of the trial.

13 And also the Court wants to let you know, it's

14 the intention of Counsel to try to finish today. They have a

15 few more witnesses and then we will have to do jury

16 instructions, some other things. That may not happen, but

17 they are going to try.

18 So if you need to make arrangements so to kind

19 of have things in order in case we go tonight and, again,

20 we'll play that by ear. But if that's the case, it may be a

21 late night but that would mean you may not have to come back

22 again. So we will work on that, as well.

23 We will try to resume Court at about 1:45. If

24 you could maybe try to be back at 1:40. Thank you.

25 Please rise for the jury.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
998

1 (The jury left the Courtroom.)

2 (Recess.)

3 THE COURT: For the record, we are making an

4 Offer of Proof on behalf of the defendant at this time for --

5 I'll let you finish that.

6 MR. SCHWARTZ: Your Honor, I would be calling

7 Linda Hartmann to further my Offer of Proof regarding the

8 life insurance issue.

9 THE COURT: You may proceed when you are ready.

10 MR. SCHWARTZ: Just as a matter of course for

11 the record, I think it's well-versed as to the Orders as to

12 whether I can and cannot get -- what I can and cannot get

13 into regarding life insurance of Betsy Faria.

14 LINDA HARTMANN,

15 a witness, having been duly sworn by the Circuit Clerk to

16 tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so

17 help you God, under the pain and penalty of the Perjury Laws

18 of Missouri, testifies as follows:

19 DIRECT EXAMINATION

20 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

21 Q. Ms. Hartmann, would you please state your

22 name?

23 A. Linda Hartmann.

24 Q. Did you know Betsy Faria?

25 A. Yes.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
999

1 Q. How did you know Betsy?

2 A. Betsy is a relative of my husband. Betsy's

3 husband is a relative of my husband and I met her through the

4 family, and I found out she had breast cancer and that's when

5 I got in touch with her because I had just got over breast

6 cancer, too.

7 Q. So you and Betsy both, at least at one point in

8 time, were both survivors of breast cancer?

9 A. Yes.

10 Q. But she had a recurrence of her breast cancer?

11 A. Yes.

12 Q. Would you consider yourselves close friends?

13 A. Yes.

14 Q. Extremely close friends?

15 A. Yes.

16 Q. Did you go on the quote, unquote, what had

17 become termed as the "Survival Cruise" with Betsy and others?

18 A. Yes, I did.

19 Q. And who else went on that cruise?

20 A. Rhonda. My husband.

21 Q. Did Russell go on the cruise?

22 A. I'm sorry?

23 Q. Did Russell Faria go on the cruise?

24 A. Russ -- yes. They were in the next room to us.

25 Q. Did Janet Myer, Betsy's mother go on the


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1000

1 cruise?

2 A. Yes.

3 Q. And then a friend of Janet's went on the

4 cruise?

5 A. Yes.

6 Q. And then when you got home just prior to

7 Christmas weekend, did you and Betsy go on a trip somewhere?

8 A. Yes. We went to Branson.

9 Q. And what days did you go to Branson?

10 A. We went, I think we went the Monday or the

11 Tuesday before Christmas, and we came back on the Thursday

12 evening. We could have stayed for a couple more days.

13 Q. Why didn't you?

14 A. Because Betsy had to go home to meet Pam. She

15 had to meet Pam about 9:30 in the morning she said; and I

16 kept on saying, isn't it a shame to leave, you know, the trip

17 when we had time off work and we could all stay extra because

18 it was a timeshare and she said, no, she had to go back

19 because she had a meeting with Pam.

20 Q. Okay.

21 A. And she didn't want to go to the meeting with

22 Pam.

23 Q. She told that to you?

24 A. Yes, she did.

25 Q. And what did Betsy tell you -- did she indicate


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1001

1 to you there was anything good -- what did she tell you about

2 her passing, her eventual passing?

3 A. She said to me, one day she just said to me,

4 "Linda, do you know I'm okay about passing on?" Because we

5 had not spoken about, you know, her leaving; and I got very

6 sort of emotional about it when she said that and I said,

7 yes, and she said, I'm okay with passing on because when I

8 leave, I'm going to be leaving life insurance with Russ and

9 the two girls so it's going to be split into three.

10 She said, so I'm really, you know, pleased that

11 I've, I've been able to do something once I've been here.

12 Q. So she thought there was at least some good out

13 of what she thought would be her eventual passing?

14 A. Yes.

15 Q. And that was on your way back here? When was

16 that conversation?

17 A. That conversation was before we went to

18 Branson.

19 Q. Okay.

20 A. It was at my house just before we went to

21 Branson. So she probably came over to my house when she

22 picked us up, and then we all went on to Branson.

23 Q. So that would be approximately, unfortunately

24 about a week before she died?

25 A. Yes. Yes.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1002

1 MR. SCHWARTZ: I have nothing further, Your

2 Honor.

3 THE COURT: State?

4 CROSS-EXAMINATION

5 BY MR. HICKS:

6 Q. Ma'am, what is your relationship to the

7 defendant, Russell Faria?

8 A. Who?

9 Q. Are you related to the defendant, Russell

10 Faria?

11 A. No. I am, I am through marriage, yes. Russ is

12 my husband's late wife's nephew.

13 Q. Okay. So by marriage you are related?

14 A. Yes. And they, you know, they grew up

15 together. Not grew up together, but they were very much in

16 the family.

17 Q. Okay. And everything I believe that you

18 just testified about is information that Betsy Faria,

19 the deceased, relayed to you prior to her death at some

20 point?

21 A. Yes.

22 MR. HICKS: Nothing further.

23 MR. SCHWARTZ: Nothing further. Thank you very

24 much, Ms. Hartmann.

25 THE COURT: Thank you.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1003

1 May this witness be released?

2 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, Your Honor.

3 THE COURT: Thank you, ma'am. You are free to

4 go or stay as you choose.

5 THE WITNESS: Thank you.

6 THE COURT: Anything else before we bring in

7 the jurors?

8 (The jurors entered the Courtroom.)

9 THE COURT: Thank you. You may be seated.

10 For the record, we will call through the roll

11 of the jurors. Number 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 15 -- 15, 27, 29, 35,

12 38, 39, 44, 51, Juror 51?

13 JUROR NUMBER 51: Yes.

14 THE COURT: And 58 and 61. Thank you. For the

15 record, all jurors are present.

16 The defendant may proceed with his case.

17 MR. SCHWARTZ: Your Honor, at this time we

18 would call Officer Frye.

19 THE COURT: Officer Frye.

20 DEAN FRYE,

21 a witness, having been duly sworn by the Circuit Clerk to

22 tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so

23 help you God, under the pain and penalty of the Perjury Laws

24 of Missouri, testifies as follows:

25 THE COURT: Proceed when you are ready.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1004

1 MR. SCHWARTZ: Thank you.

2 DIRECT EXAMINATION

3 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

4 Q. Would you state your name, please?

5 A. Dean Frye.

6 Q. Are you employed?

7 A. I'm a Detective with the O'Fallon, Missouri,

8 Police Department and attached to the Major Case Squad of

9 Greater St. Louis.

10 Q. All right. So it's Detective Frye?

11 A. Yes.

12 Q. How long have you been a Police Officer?

13 A. Sixteen years now.

14 Q. How long have you been with the Major Case?

15 A. Three years, I believe.

16 Q. Three years. Were you assigned to an

17 investigation in December 2011 up in Lincoln County?

18 A. Yes, I was.

19 Q. And as part of that investigation, you received

20 information as to locations where Russell Faria had stated he

21 had been; is that correct?

22 A. Yes, I did.

23 Q. And as a result of that information, what did

24 you do?

25 A. We went to those locations and tried to attain


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1005

1 either video surveillance or receipt for that location, if

2 they didn't have the video surveillance.

3 Q. And those locations were what?

4 A. They were the Conoco in Troy, the U-Gas in

5 Wentzville, the -- I believe it's Crane's or -- I can't

6 remember the name of the Country Store.

7 Q. Would that be Greene's Country Store?

8 A. Yes. Greene's Country Store on Highway N and

9 the QuikTrip there. I believe it would be a Lake St. Louis

10 address.

11 Q. Do you know the date or the time that you went

12 to retrieve these items?

13 A. Not off the top of my head, no.

14 Q. Was it very soon thereafter, after you received

15 this information?

16 A. Yes.

17 Q. Possibly the next morning?

18 A. I believe so.

19 Q. All right. Were you successful in retrieving

20 videos and/or receipts?

21 A. Yes.

22 Q. Specifically from Conoco, do you know if you

23 received a video or a receipt?

24 A. Video.

25 Q. And from U-Gas?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1006

1 A. A video.

2 Q. Greene's Country Store?

3 A. A receipt.

4 Q. And QuikTrip?

5 A. A video.

6 Q. Video. All right. We don't have copies of the

7 DVDs. They are actually in the projector.

8 MR. SCHWARTZ: Judge, with your permission,

9 could I show him the actual DVDs that were obtained?

10 THE COURT: Yes.

11 Q. (By Mr. Schwartz) It may serve you better if

12 you may step down, Officer.

13 A. Certainly.

14 MR. SCHWARTZ: Judge, I realize these haven't

15 been admitted into evidence yet, but I don't believe there's

16 an objection. I believe the State has seen them.

17 I would ask they be admitted into evidence and

18 would have the Officer identify them that way.

19 THE COURT: Does State have any objection?

20 MR. HICKS: No, Judge.

21 THE COURT: Thank you.

22 You may proceed. Then are you going to name

23 these something?

24 MR. SCHWARTZ: We will call them Defendant's

25 Exhibits -- it's all on one disk. So it's Defendant's


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1007

1 Exhibit O, and we'll mark it after we're done.

2 THE COURT: Perfect.

3 Q. (By Mr. Schwartz) Officer, do you recognize --

4 this video hasn't started. Just based on what you are

5 seeing, can you recognize where this video is from?

6 A. I'm not certain. I believe it's the Conoco.

7 Q. Okay.

8 MR. SCHWARTZ: Why don't you go ahead and turn

9 it on and show him.

10 Q. (By Mr Schwartz) If you could stop us when you

11 see Mr. Faria or if you do, in fact, see Mr. Faria in one of

12 the frames?

13 A. The image down at the middle, bottom I think is

14 where his car was parked. He was standing to the right of

15 it.

16 Q. He was standing to the right of the middle one

17 at the bottom?

18 A. Right here. That's him there.

19 Q. All right. Stop it. All right. Now did you

20 get a time from Conoco that this video was taken?

21 A. Yes, I did.

22 Q. What was that time, if you recall?

23 A. I don't recall the exact time.

24 Q. Would that be approximately from 5:16 to 5:20

25 on December the 27th?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1008

1 A. It could have been.

2 Q. Do you disagree with that time?

3 A. Not from my recollection, no.

4 Q. Do you have your report with you?

5 A. Yes, I do.

6 Q. Would it help you to refresh your recollection?

7 A. Certainly.

8 Q. Officer, while you are looking. You didn't

9 divide this into six videos? This is how Conoco had it when

10 you seized it, correct?

11 A. Yes, sir.

12 Q. Okay.

13 A. The report states that video showed Faria

14 pulling to Pump No. 9 at 1716 hours on 12/27/2011 and driving

15 away at 1720 hours.

16 Q. So that would be 5:16 to 5:20 on 12/27/2011,

17 correct?

18 A. Yes.

19 Q. I want to go ahead and play -- if you want to

20 come down. You watched that video, correct?

21 A. Yes.

22 Q. He just pumps the gas. Never goes to the

23 store?

24 A. That's my recollection.

25 Q. Just pays at the pump? Never does anything


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1009

1 else?

2 A. That's my recollection.

3 Q. Do you know if Mr. Faria comes up again on the

4 video?

5 A. I don't believe he does.

6 Q. He doesn't. We're good. You had documentation

7 of him paying at the pump and appearing on the video between

8 5:16 and 5:20?

9 A. Yes, sir.

10 Q. After that, did you go to -- I think the next

11 place you said U-Gas?

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. Was there a video taken at U-Gas?

14 A. Yes, sir.

15 Q. Were you able to secure that video?

16 A. Yes, I believe so.

17 MR. SCHWARTZ: This will be part of Defendant's

18 Exhibit O.

19 THE COURT: The State, I believe, already

20 expressed no objection to Defendant's Exhibit O, so it's

21 admitted into evidence.

22 Q. (By Mr. Schwartz) Could you note the time on

23 the screen, Detective?

24 A. The bottom right-hand corner says 1725 and 29

25 seconds and counting.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1010

1 Q. Now you have no idea if that time is

2 synchronized with any other clocks, do you?

3 A. I do not, but I know -- I believe that store

4 was four minutes off from Greenwich Mean Time with our

5 research on that time.

6 Q. Officer, when you went there to seize the

7 video, you had an approximate time that Mr. Faria had

8 indicated he was there, right?

9 A. Yes, I did.

10 Q. You were going through videos just like we are

11 now?

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. Officer, in the interest of moving forward,

14 based on your report, do you know what time he came in?

15 A. There's a blue slide bar. If you move that to

16 the middle part of the video, that's where you'll see him.

17 The gentleman stands to the right of the employee then

18 crosses behind this employee. That's when he pops in.

19 Q. Are we about there then? Right there?

20 A. Should be coming up after this.

21 Q. Okay.

22 A. That's him there.

23 Q. You were able to confirm?

24 A. Just through the video and what I would

25 describe as his clothing.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1011

1 Q. And that's the same clothing that was described

2 to you he was wearing when he was arrested later that evening

3 when the police were called, correct?

4 A. Yes.

5 Q. And that clothing was ultimately seized and

6 sent to the lab, as far as you know?

7 A. I believe it was.

8 Q. Okay. Does he come back in or anything after

9 that?

10 A. No, sir.

11 Q. Thank you, Officer. The next place you went

12 was Greene's Country Store; is that correct?

13 A. Yes.

14 Q. And at Greene's Country Store, you were able to

15 retrieve a receipt?

16 A. Yes, I did.

17 Q. Just a minute, Officer. Do you have a copy of

18 it?

19 A. Yes, sir. I do.

20 (Defendant's Exhibit P marked for

21 identification.)

22 Q. Is this a copy, Officer?

23 A. Yes, it is.

24 Q. Does this copy, Defendant's Exhibit P,

25 reasonably depict that receipt that you seized that


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1012

1 particular evening?

2 A. Yes, it does.

3 Q. I know that the writing is small and the lights

4 are off. Can you read it? Would you prefer the lights on?

5 A. I can read it with it off.

6 Q. Okay. What does it say?

7 A. On top it says (as read), "Greene's Country

8 Store". Not sure what it has after that. It says, "Address

9 8621 Highway N, Lake St. Louis, Missouri". The zip code is

10 illegible. The phone number is "(636) 562" -- it looks like

11 "6037" but it's hardly legible.

12 Q. Let me stop you, Officer. What time was that

13 receipt stamped?

14 A. It was stamped 12/27/2011 at 1752:16.

15 Q. Which would be 5:52?

16 A. Yes, sir.

17 Q. Right. And as far as that clock goes, was that

18 clock checked to see if it was synchronized with your clock

19 or you don't know?

20 A. I don't know that it was.

21 Q. How do you know that that receipt was the

22 receipt Russell Faria used to purchase something?

23 A. It was obtained by his credit card information.

24 It also has his name, first and last name at the bottom and

25 his signature.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1013

1 Q. What was purchased?

2 A. Dog food.

3 Q. All right.

4 MR. SCHWARTZ: I would ask for the admission of

5 Defendant's Exhibit P.

6 THE COURT: Any objection to Defendant's P?

7 MR. HICKS: No objection.

8 THE COURT: Defendant's P is admitted.

9 Q. (By Mr. Schwartz) After you ascertained that

10 receipt, did you then go to the QuikTrip?

11 A. Yes, sir.

12 Q. Where is that QuikTrip located?

13 A. I believe the actual address is Lake St. Louis.

14 It's on the fringe of O'Fallon and Lake St. Louis on Highway

15 N and Highway 40.

16 Q. Did you seize -- were you able to seize a video

17 at that address?

18 A. Yes, sir.

19 Q. I think this is part of Defendant's Exhibit O.

20 Would you stand and take a look at that video

21 that you seized, and if you can stop us if and when you see

22 Mr. Faria?

23 A. That's him approaching the counter. That's him

24 leaving the store.

25 Q. All right. Go ahead and sit down, sir. Just


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1014

1 so we're clear, you knew to go to that those places because

2 you had received information that Russell Faria had talked to

3 other Officers and told them that's where he went?

4 A. Yes, sir.

5 Q. Were you able to ascertain that is, in fact,

6 where he went?

7 A. Yes, sir.

8 Q. Were you able to ascertain he was, in fact,

9 wearing the same clothes that he was wearing when he was

10 being interviewed at the police department and when he was

11 called, when the police arrived that evening?

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. As far as you were told, those clothes had been

14 conveyed to the lab?

15 A. Yes.

16 MR. SCHWARTZ: Nothing further.

17 THE COURT: State?

18 CROSS-EXAMINATION

19 BY MR. HICKS:

20 Q. Officer, on that last slide, I don't see that

21 you, that we just watched there, it appeared that the

22 defendant purchased two large bottles of tea?

23 A. Yes.

24 Q. All right. Okay. And I want to ask you about,

25 and defense has been kind enough to let me do that rather


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1015

1 than recalling you, but a different subject matter that they

2 didn't talk about here, okay?

3 A. Okay.

4 Q. I want to take you to December 28th in the

5 early morning hours. Did you and an Officer McCann go do

6 some interviews? One interview was at the Corbin residence

7 and his girlfriend or significant other?

8 A. Yes.

9 Q. All right. Where was that?

10 A. I don't remember the exact address. I could

11 reflect but it was in Rolling Meadows Trailer Park.

12 Q. And about what time in the morning did you go?

13 A. I don't recall the exact time.

14 Q. Okay.

15 A. I believe it was 4:00 or 4:30 in the morning.

16 Something around that time. I don't remember the exact time.

17 Q. If it was around, if the previous evidence has

18 been, I think it was around 6 o'clock in the morning, do you

19 have a problem with that?

20 A. That would be correct. I know the sun hadn't

21 came up yet.

22 Q. It was early morning hours?

23 A. Yes.

24 Q. Were they awake?

25 A. Yes, they were.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1016

1 Q. You only spoke to them for about, what, ten, 15

2 minutes?

3 A. Yes.

4 Q. All right. From there, where did you go?

5 A. We went to Mr. Bach and Mr. Sweeney's

6 residence. We had learned from those two individuals that

7 they were at the house that night also with Russell Faria and

8 they had went home and they gave us that address.

9 Q. So it was about 5:30 in the morning when you

10 were over at the Corbin's, correct?

11 A. Yes.

12 Q. Michael Corbin's. One thing I want to ask you

13 about. When you walked into the residence, did they invite

14 you in to talk?

15 A. We knocked on the door and they answered the

16 door and invited us in, yes.

17 Q. Did you notice any smell, odor?

18 A. Yes. When we got out of the car and in the

19 street, we could smell the odor of burnt marijuana.

20 Q. Burnt marijuana. What about while you were

21 inside the house?

22 A. You could smell it inside the whole house.

23 Q. You could smell it when you were inside the

24 home?

25 A. Yes.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1017

1 Q. You talked to them briefly, correct?

2 A. Yes.

3 Q. Of course, I know you weren't there about drugs

4 or anything. You were talking to them about this matter?

5 A. Yes.

6 Q. From there, you went directly to Brandon

7 Sweeney's house; is that correct?

8 A. Yes, sir.

9 Q. When you arrived there, do you remember which

10 individual answered the door?

11 A. I don't.

12 Q. Okay. And one, did one or both of the

13 individuals that you talked to that morning answer the door?

14 A. Yes. One of them. One or both did. They were

15 both in the living room when we were there.

16 Q. Where did you speak with them?

17 A. It's kind of a living room/kitchen area. It's

18 all combined into one.

19 Q. Okay. Did you talk to them there together?

20 A. Yes.

21 Q. All right. Now just for reference and to speed

22 this thing up, I believe Marshall Bach in his statement tells

23 you he's dropped off by Brandon Sweeney and that Brandon went

24 on the evening before to Jack in the Box. Do you recall

25 that?
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1018

1 A. Yeah, he was hungry so he went to get some Jack

2 in the Box.

3 Q. Do you remember Brandon Sweeney being

4 definitive about the time period he went to Jack in the Box?

5 A. Yes. He said he remembered looking

6 specifically at the clock in his dashboard of his vehicle and

7 that the time was 9:05.

8 Q. Okay. Is that how he referenced what time it

9 was?

10 A. Yes.

11 Q. Okay. Did he ever bring up to you that he had

12 a receipt from having gone to Jack in the Box?

13 A. He did not.

14 Q. Okay. Did you ever ask him to go out to his

15 vehicle and retrieve a receipt from Jack in the Box?

16 A. No, I didn't.

17 Q. Hypothetically speaking, if he had gone out and

18 gotten, at your request, a receipt and brought it back in,

19 all right, to establish this time period, okay, would you

20 have taken that receipt from him?

21 A. Certainly.

22 Q. Okay. So you are telling us none of that

23 happened?

24 A. No, sir.

25 Q. All right.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1019

1 MR. HICKS: I don't have any further questions.

2 THE COURT: Mr. Schwartz?

3 REDIRECT EXAMINATION

4 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

5 Q. But you did interview them and they all were

6 consistent that they were with Russell Faria and they went

7 into detail, and you even noted in your report that there was

8 no substantial dissimilarity between their interviews,

9 correct?

10 A. That is correct.

11 Q. We're talking about all four of those folks?

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. That was the next morning?

14 A. Yeah.

15 Q. Okay. Within the next couple of days?

16 A. Yes, sir.

17 MR. SCHWARTZ: Nothing further.

18 RECROSS-EXAMINATION

19 BY MR. HICKS:

20 Q. Just so we're clear, though, that first

21 interview it sounds like, even with the Corbins, it was what,

22 ten, 15 minutes?

23 A. Yes, sir.

24 Q. Rather brief?

25 A. Yes.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1020

1 Q. And then the second interview, or the second

2 home you went to that you just talked to, just as brief?

3 A. Yeah. Fifteen, 20 minutes.

4 Q. Okay. Subsequent to that in the next two or

5 three days, you brought all of these individuals down to the

6 police station, or somebody did, and they were interviewed

7 again, correct?

8 A. Yes, sir.

9 Q. In more detail?

10 A. Yes, sir. There were recorded interviews

11 conducted by myself and other Detectives assigned to that

12 case at that time.

13 MR. HICKS: Nothing further.

14 FURTHER REDIRECT EXAMINATION

15 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

16 Q. Officer McCann, as far as you knew, or you knew

17 for a fact --

18 A. Detective Frye.

19 Q. -- while you were interviewing these folks --

20 I'm sorry, Officer Frye. I'm getting old. Officer Frye, I'm

21 sorry. You were aware that Russell Faria was at the police

22 station here in Lincoln County being interviewed while you

23 were conducting these interviews?

24 A. Yes.

25 MR. SCHWARTZ: Nothing further.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1021

1 FURTHER RECROSS-EXAMINATION

2 BY MR. HICKS:

3 Q. Okay. But two days later -- well, let me put

4 it this way, ask it this way. In that initial interview with

5 all of these individuals, Angela, Michael, Brandon and

6 Marshall?

7 A. Yes.

8 Q. Okay? Did Marshall or Brandon say anything

9 about watching two movies at that first interview?

10 A. I believe they just said they watched a movie

11 and it was "Conan the Barbarian".

12 Q. All right. So they didn't even -- I'm just

13 trying to point out, they didn't mention that there was a

14 second movie they found boring, correct?

15 A. Correct.

16 Q. That kind of additional detail happened later,

17 in the two or three days later, correct?

18 A. Yes, it did.

19 Q. Such as details such as whether the defendant's

20 phone went off, correct?

21 A. Yes.

22 Q. Such as whether he, where he was sitting, if

23 that came up. It was that kind of additional detail that

24 came later. It wasn't in that first interview, right?

25 A. Correct.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1022

1 Q. It was just to find out was he even with you.

2 Is that what you are saying?

3 A. Correct.

4 Q. If that's the case, we need to set something up

5 later to get more detail?

6 A. Right.

7 MR. HICKS: Nothing further.

8 FURTHER REDIRECT EXAMINATION

9 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

10 Q. In all fairness, that first interview was very

11 short?

12 A. Yes, it was.

13 Q. Ten, 15 minutes? And that second interview was

14 very long and detailed?

15 A. Yes, sir.

16 MR. SCHWARTZ: Nothing further.

17 THE COURT: State?

18 FURTHER RECROSS-EXAMINATION

19 BY MR. HICKS:

20 Q. And in that second interview with Brandon --

21 I've got to have to last word.

22 MR. SCHWARTZ: He does.

23 Q. (By Mr. Hicks) I know. In that second

24 interview with Brandon, does the receipt come up?

25 A. It did not.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1023

1 Q. It did not. All right.

2 MR. HICKS: Nothing further.

3 MR. SCHWARTZ: Nothing further.

4 THE COURT: May this witness be released?

5 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes.

6 THE WITNESS: Thank you.

7 MR. HICKS: Sorry.

8 MR. SCHWARTZ: That's okay.

9 THE COURT: Thank you. You are released.

10 MR. SCHWARTZ: I would call Kurt Ponzar to the

11 stand.

12 THE COURT: Kurt Ponzar. Mr. Ponzar, would you

13 please come forward and raise your right hand to be sworn by

14 the Clerk.

15 KURT PONZAR,

16 a witness, having been duly sworn by the Circuit Clerk to

17 tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so

18 help you God, under the pain and penalty of the Perjury Laws

19 of Missouri, testifies as follows:

20 (Defendant's Exhibit O and Q marked for

21 identification.)

22 DIRECT EXAMINATION

23 BY MR. SWANSON:

24 Q. Mr. Ponzar, can you please introduce yourself

25 to the jury?
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1024

1 A. My name is Kurt Ponzar.

2 Q. What do you do?

3 A. I'm a private investigator.

4 Q. And how do you train to be a private

5 investigator?

6 A. Well, in my case, it was on-the-job training.

7 Q. What kind of on-the-job training?

8 A. Well, I worked for the Pinkerton Detective

9 Agency for a few years and then, at that point, I went in

10 business for myself.

11 Q. How long have you been a private investigator?

12 A. Since 1976.

13 Q. So that's 37 years?

14 A. Thirty-six or so.

15 Q. And you were retained by the defendant?

16 A. Yes.

17 Q. And is one of the things you were asked to do

18 is time various drives?

19 A. Yes.

20 Q. Could you tell us which drives you were asked

21 to time?

22 A. Well, I was asked to drive from the Arby's

23 there off Highway N.

24 Q. That's the Arby's at 909 Robert Raymond Drive?

25 A. Right. To the Faria residence in Troy.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1025

1 Q. That's 130 Sumac Road?

2 A. That's correct.

3 Q. How many times did you make that drive?

4 A. Oh, I made it several times.

5 Q. Three?

6 A. Three times.

7 Q. At least?

8 A. At least three, yes. Three I believe I

9 videotaped. I believe I may have made it a couple more

10 without.

11 Q. You say you videotaped one?

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. How did you start the drive off? Like where

14 were you?

15 A. Well, I started in like the Arby's lot, went

16 through the drive-thru and then from the drive-thru, I just

17 started running my camera.

18 Q. And drove?

19 A. Drove from there out to "N" to the Highway and

20 up to Troy.

21 Q. And what speed about were you going?

22 A. On the highway, about 70 or so we averaged.

23 Q. And did you take some time to make sure that

24 someone ordered food so you were kind of getting the feel of

25 how long it would take to order food and then get back to
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1026

1 Troy?

2 A. Yes.

3 Q. You recorded all of that?

4 A. Yes.

5 Q. And this is the disk of that recording; is that

6 correct?

7 A. That's correct.

8 MR. SWANSON: I'm going to ask that this be

9 admitted.

10 THE COURT: What number is that?

11 MR. SWANSON: Defendant's Exhibit Q.

12 THE COURT: Any objection by the State?

13 MR. HICKS: No.

14 THE COURT: Defendant's Exhibit Q is admitted

15 into evidence.

16 Q. (By Mr. Swanson) Rather than subject the jury

17 to the full period of it, how long does that drive take?

18 A. It was between 28 and 32 minutes.

19 Q. In fact, this particular drive where you were

20 averaging about 70 miles an hour was 30 minutes?

21 A. That's right.

22 Q. At the end of the drive, when you arrived at

23 the Faria residence, did you get out of the car?

24 A. Yes, I got out and walked to the door.

25 Q. And you continued recording for all of


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1027

1 that?

2 A. Yes.

3 Q. So from the time that you observed someone

4 order food at Arby's to the time you arrived at the Faria

5 door was approximately?

6 A. Thirty minutes.

7 MR. SWANSON: I have nothing further.

8 THE COURT: State?

9 MR. HICKS: You can have the last word. No

10 questions.

11 THE COURT: May this witness be released?

12 MR. SWANSON: Yes, Your Honor.

13 THE COURT: Thank you. You may be released.

14 Further evidence on behalf of defense?

15 MR. SCHWARTZ: We would call Greg Chatten, Your

16 Honor.

17 THE COURT: Greg Chatten. Mr. Chatten, if you

18 would come forward and raise your right hand to be sworn by

19 the Clerk.

20 GREG CHATTEN,

21 a witness, having been duly sworn by the Circuit Clerk to

22 tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so

23 help you God, under pain and penalty of the Perjury Laws of

24 Missouri, testifies as follows:

25 THE COURT: You may proceed when your ready.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1028

1 DIRECT EXAMINATION

2 BY MR. SWANSON:

3 Q. Mr. Chatten, could you introduce yourself to

4 the jury?

5 A. My name is Greg Chatten and I own Forensic

6 Computer Service, Advanced Digital Systems, St. Louis

7 Internet, and I'm a managing partner of Sterns, Chatten, LLC.

8 Q. What do you do?

9 A. Primarily, about 90 percent of my work is for

10 forensic computer service, and we analyze data from computer

11 hard drives, external media like thumb drives or removable

12 hard drives, and I've been qualified as an expert insider,

13 data analysis and data mapping.

14 Q. When you say "qualified as an expert", who

15 qualifies you?

16 A. The Court in the State of Missouri. I've been

17 qualified as an expert for cellular mapping and for data

18 forensics, multiple Federal Courts and multiple State Courts

19 in and out of Missouri.

20 Q. And prior to your current employment, what else

21 or what's your educational background?

22 A. I am a graduate of Quincy High School in

23 Quincy, Illinois, and I then attended Illinois State

24 University and went to Digital Communication Associates,

25 which I graduated as a Computer Network Engineer.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1029

1 Q. And prior to your current employment, where did

2 you work?

3 A. I worked for Triangle Communication Associates

4 back in 1976 as a computer programmer and operator. I worked

5 for Data Research Associates in the late '70s through about

6 1982 doing programming, design, actually writing programs and

7 doing customer support for municipal libraries around the

8 United States.

9 After that, I worked for O'Donnell and Phelps

10 and Co., which is like a money manager, investment management

11 firm.

12 I then worked ten years for Universal Sewing

13 Supply in St. Louis. I ran that company for five of those

14 years.

15 Then in 1970, I'm sorry, in 1996, I left and

16 started Advanced Digital Systems, and we provided two-way

17 communications, wireless communications for businesses and

18 law enforcement, and we also maintained all of the Jennings,

19 Missouri, Police Department car radios.

20 And in 2004, I incorporated Forensic Computer

21 Service to do data forensics on what I had mentioned before,

22 computer hard drives and things of that nature.

23 Q. Have you ever worked with wireless or cellular

24 technology?

25 A. Yes.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1030

1 Q. What were you doing there?

2 A. We were installing two-way portable and base

3 station equipment for businesses. Part of that was on the

4 Nextel system, which is now part of Sprint. That's the

5 cellular side.

6 On the radio side, it was more for business

7 communication between Fleets and that type of scenario.

8 Q. You mentioned you provided cellular mapping and

9 cellular data analysis?

10 A. Correct.

11 Q. Are you required to be licensed to do that?

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. And who requires that license?

14 A. The Missouri Board of Professional

15 Registration.

16 Q. Do you have that license?

17 A. I do.

18 Q. Does it require reoccurring training?

19 A. It does.

20 Q. How much?

21 A. Sixteen hours every two years.

22 Q. And are you currently up to date?

23 A. Yes.

24 Q. Have you ever given any presentations or

25 seminars on cellular data mapping, cell site mapping?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1031

1 A. I have.

2 Q. What kind?

3 A. I've given presentations specific to cellular

4 data analysis and mapping to two private investigator groups,

5 one in St. Louis and one in Kansas City in March of 2012.

6 I presented at the Missouri Bar Association in Branson,

7 Missouri, June of 2013, and I gave two presentations at the

8 Missouri Bar Association Conference in October of 2013.

9 Q. And you were retained by the defendant in this

10 case?

11 A. Correct.

12 Q. And you are being paid by the defendant?

13 A. I am.

14 Q. When were you retained?

15 A. I have to refer to my notes for a moment. That

16 was on June 9 of 2013.

17 Q. And I think you mentioned this but you have

18 previously been accepted as an expert and testified in a

19 Court of law on the issue of cellular data mapping?

20 A. I have.

21 Q. And what were you, what did we ask you to

22 examine?

23 A. You asked me to employ cellular phone records

24 from T-Mobile that were provided by the government to you and

25 then to me and also cellular records from AT&T that were


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1032

1 provided by the government to you and then to me.

2 Q. And have you ever decoded, processed and mapped

3 cellular data from AT&T Cellular?

4 A. Yes. I have done both.

5 MR. SWANSON: At this time, Your Honor, I would

6 ask that Mr. Chatten be accepted as an expert witness in the

7 area of cellular data analysis and mapping.

8 THE COURT: Any objection by the State?

9 MR. HICKS: No, Your Honor.

10 THE COURT: You may proceed.

11 MR. SWANSON: Thank you, Your Honor.

12 Q. (By Mr. Swanson) Let's talk about the T-Mobile

13 records you received. What were those records?

14 A. The T-Mobile records consist of data that

15 T-Mobile collects. Every time your phone makes or receives a

16 call, sends or receives a text message or if it uses mobile

17 data like going out on the Internet or data from the Internet

18 being sent to you, and those records not only contain that

19 information, but they contain additional information that

20 includes phone numbers, they tell me which cellular tower,

21 which would be an antenna sticking out of the ground as you

22 have probably seen all over the place.

23 They can also tell me which area from that

24 tower that cellular phone is located at.

25 Q. When you say "each area", can you elaborate on


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1033

1 that?

2 A. Certainly. For each cell tower, you can think

3 of it as Grandma's home-baked pie and split it in thirds. So

4 we've got three pieces of pie on these cell towers and a cell

5 phone will connect to a tower only on one of those slices of

6 pie if it's in that area.

7 So if I move around, I may get connected

8 through another piece of the pie to that cell tower, even

9 though it's the same physical tower at the same location.

10 So from that, I'm able to determine the area a

11 particular phone was in based on the records provided by

12 T-Mobile and AT&T or any of the other carriers.

13 Q. And you can't say exactly where the phone is?

14 A. No. I can tell you where it wasn't and I can

15 tell you the geographical area that it was.

16 Q. Basically which slice of pie it's in?

17 A. Correct.

18 Q. Were you provided that information for Russell

19 Faria's phone number, (314) 565-9027, for December 27, 2011?

20 A. Yes.

21 Q. And were you able to use that data to assemble

22 a map of which pie slice he is, --

23 A. Yes.

24 Q. -- his phone was in that evening?

25 A. I was.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1034

1 MR. SWANSON: May I approach the witness, Your

2 Honor?

3 THE COURT: Yes.

4 Q. (By Mr. Swanson) Is this a copy of the map you

5 were able to produce?

6 A. It was.

7 MR. SWANSON: I would ask that be admitted as

8 Defendant's Exhibit R.

9 MR. HICKS: Object without further foundation.

10 I don't know what, I don't know how he generated it. I think

11 there's a lack of foundation.

12 Q. (By Mr. Swanson) How did you generate the map?

13 A. The map was generated by taking the information

14 provided from the government from T-Mobile and AT&T which

15 gives me the tower locations.

16 I combine that with data that I already had

17 from T-Mobile that covered this specific date that gave me

18 which sector each tower was split into that the government

19 failed to provide us.

20 MR. HICKS: I'm going to object to the -- one,

21 that's a nonresponsive answer. We haven't provided this

22 individual anything directly. The defense has provided it.

23 And so if he would -- one, my objection is that that's

24 nonresponsive to the question, saying that we didn't provide

25 something, the government.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1035

1 MR. SWANSON: He's saying he used data that he

2 had available.

3 MR. HICKS: I understand, but he kept saying

4 that the government provided and we haven't provided him

5 anything. We provided you all stuff.

6 MR. SWANSON: Fair.

7 THE COURT: Sustained as to that objection.

8 Q. (By Mr. Swanson) The data that you received,

9 that was the data that the defense received from the

10 government?

11 A. Correct.

12 Q. And we provided that to you?

13 A. Correct.

14 Q. And you combined that with other data that you

15 had to fill in some gaps?

16 A. Correct.

17 Q. That was appropriated from T-Mobile --

18 A. Correct.

19 Q. -- for that particular time period?

20 A. It was.

21 Q. What did you do with the data then?

22 A. With the data, I was able to map, using the

23 geographical coordinates that are provided with the data, I

24 was able to show which towers were used on specific phone

25 calls so I could place a tower physically on the map as to


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1036

1 where it's located.

2 I also get, as I spoke earlier, about the tower

3 being split up into three pieces of pie. I get the direction

4 that each pie faces. So that data came from T-Mobile, so I

5 was able to split each one of these towers up into these

6 three sectors.

7 And after that was done, I used the, what we

8 call the Call Detail Report. This is a report that T-Mobile

9 generated and was provided to me through the defense counsel

10 and I, based on that, I've got dates and times that data went

11 back and forth between the tower and the phones, regardless

12 if it was voice data or text, and I was able to place the

13 phone, based on that data and the time, I was able to place

14 it in a specific sector, a piece of the pie.

15 Q. The map you used, that's just standard Google

16 maps?

17 A. Yes. We use Google Earth Pro to do the

18 mapping. I might also mention that I did mark the pieces of

19 the pie on each tower for which there is no activity. There

20 was no data. The phone was in that particular sector.

21 MR. SWANSON: At this time, I would ask that be

22 admitted as Exhibit R.

23 MR. HICKS: I think I'm still going to make the

24 same objection. I'm not trying to be difficult here. But I

25 don't even know what information was used to indicate where


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1037

1 these towers are located.

2 I know he's talked about the cell phone data, I

3 mean the cell phone records. But we've got towers on here.

4 What information did he use to get those towers placed on his

5 map?

6 MR. SWANSON: I think I asked this, but I can

7 ask it again if it's not clear.

8 Q. (By Mr. Swanson) You had information from

9 T-Mobile that you had previously received directly from

10 T-Mobile?

11 A. Correct.

12 Q. And that information said what towers and what

13 cell site information, cell ID, identifiers basically?

14 A. It told me the geographical coordinates of each

15 cell tower and it told me how to split up those three pieces

16 of pie, which direction they went in.

17 Q. And the information you had was current as of

18 12/27/2011?

19 A. Yes.

20 Q. And so you are able to map where the tower was

21 and where each antenna faced, so where each section of the

22 pie was?

23 A. Correct. And I also used the data you provided

24 me from T-Mobile as far as the geographical coordinates of

25 each tower and it exactly matched what I had already received


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1038

1 from T-Mobile.

2 Q. And the information I provided you was

3 information the government provided to the defense?

4 A. That's my understanding.

5 MR. HICKS: May we approach?

6 THE COURT: Yes.

7 (Discussion at the bench.)

8 MR. HICKS: I still am going to object to him

9 being able to testify about creating a map because, one, it

10 would be based upon hearsay information that he got from

11 T-Mobile. I don't have any, we don't have any records from

12 T-Mobile.

13 I know we have got the records, the phone

14 records but do we have any -- I don't see any records that

15 have been introduced from T-Mobile to say here is the

16 T-Mobile records, because he keeps saying the stuff that we

17 provided to him from the government he used. I get that.

18 But then there's other information that he

19 already had that he got from T-Mobile that he used in

20 conjunction to create this map. So it would be created based

21 upon hearsay. They might be able to do that if you could

22 introduce first that group of the documents and say, okay,

23 this is the T-Mobile information, you know, business record

24 affidavit or whatever.

25 MR. SWANSON: First, he said he confirmed the


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1039

1 location of the towers using the information received from

2 the government, that the government provided to us and that

3 we provided to him. So any hearsay objection is I would say

4 covered by the business record affidavit that you provided us

5 from T-Mobile.

6 MR. HICKS: I get that part of it.

7 MR. SWANSON: So then you can cross-examine

8 him, too, as to whether or not there would be any

9 inaccuracies here.

10 MR. HICKS: Again, what I heard him testify to

11 was that he used the information the government provided.

12 Then he had his own information. He says it was accurate and

13 everything from T-Mobile. That may be, but he still -- He's

14 using hearsay information to generate this based on this

15 report that the jury will be looking at. It's going to be

16 based upon hearsay information.

17 Now I think he could get around it by

18 introducing documents from T-Mobile that he's talked about

19 that I don't think were provided to us. These documents say

20 these are what our experts relied upon to get the tower

21 locations in conjunction with the data that you guys provided

22 us. If he did that, then that would overcome that hearsay

23 exception. Right now, his testimony in regards to this map

24 is based upon hearsay from T-Mobile that we don't have in the

25 Courtroom.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1040

1 MR. SWANSON: Would you like me to pull the

2 letter when I requested that information that you have in

3 your possession that you provided and you have not ever

4 responded to that? I had to go outside the normal trials to

5 get it. Do you want to talk about that?

6 MR. SCHWARTZ: It's not hearsay if he's an

7 expert and he's saying where his information came from. It

8 doesn't affect the admissibility. They can certainly

9 cross-examine him on that. They can cross-examine him on the

10 map that he produced.

11 It's based upon the information generally that

12 they provided. As far as him being an expert, that's like

13 saying he has to produce the books that he studied from.

14 That's like saying he has to produce his college diploma.

15 I mean, technically, that's all based on

16 hearsay.

17 MR. HICKS: I think that's totally different.

18 I'm not talking about that. That's why I waited for him to

19 testify about this before I made this argument because I'm

20 trying to figure out how did he figure out these tower

21 locations because he couldn't do it from the phone data

22 alone.

23 He needed separate information provided to him

24 from T-Mobile to do this. He's basing his testimony upon

25 hearsay information that for him to say, look, there's a


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1041

1 tower here and there's a tower here, there's a tower here and

2 there's a tower there. He's doing that based upon

3 information provided to him from T-Mobile, which is hearsay.

4 I think the proper way to have done this was to

5 have those records in here, whether a business record or

6 whatever and say these are the T-Mobile records that I relied

7 upon.

8 THE COURT: Is there something else somewhere

9 else at this time--

10 COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry. I can't hear you.

11 THE COURT: I didn't hear him say there was a

12 discrepancy between the towers provided by the State and

13 T-Mobile.

14 MR. SWANSON: There's not.

15 MR. HICKS: There's not.

16 THE COURT: So that's not a problem, but are

17 you saying that he applied extra information that he could

18 not have had?

19 MR. HICKS: That's my understanding. I

20 thought, what I heard him testify to was that the information

21 that the government didn't provide him he had to get from

22 T-Mobile himself.

23 He had -- this is information he obtained to do

24 all of this. That's hearsay. He's saying he didn't have

25 enough to do what he needed to do from us. He got it from


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1042

1 somebody else. And it hasn't been given over to us, but more

2 importantly, I don't care about that as much as it hasn't

3 been introduced here at trial saying, here's the business

4 record of the T-Mobile stuff that I got from them. This is

5 what I relied upon. This has all the numbers in it. This is

6 how I generated the locations of the cell towers.

7 THE COURT: Do you have the records that he

8 used to draft them?

9 MR. SWANSON: No, Your Honor. He did testify

10 that he used the information the government had provided us

11 about the locations of these towers. He confirmed what he

12 had and that would be covered by the business record

13 affidavit you provided.

14 MR. SCHWARTZ: What you thought he said is what

15 he said.

16 MR. HICKS: I get the --

17 THE COURT: Cross-examine but reintroduce it

18 and revisit.

19 MR. HICKS: Can I just voir dire the witness on

20 two questions and then I'll--

21 THE COURT: For now, we won't introduce it and

22 cross-examine and you reintroduce it and see where we are at

23 at that point.

24 MR. SWANSON: We would have to cross-examine

25 before going any further, so maybe have him voir dire the
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1043

1 witness on that.

2 MR. HICKS: Just a couple questions and then

3 I'll be happy.

4 THE COURT: That's fine. If you wouldn't mind,

5 one of you to clarify. I think, I thought you said the

6 towers he got all from you. Maybe I misunderstood, but then

7 the T-Mobile stuff matched?

8 I thought the information said it was missing

9 with something else.

10 MR. SWANSON: That was the tower information,

11 but we were eventually able to locate some from what the

12 State provided and he confirmed use of that.

13 THE COURT: Okay.

14 (End of bench discussion.)

15 THE COURT: State may proceed.

16 VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION

17 BY MR. HICKS:

18 Q. I have a couple questions for you because maybe

19 I'm not understanding.

20 A. Certainly.

21 Q. You talked about the information the government

22 provided you via the defense counsel, you know, the cell

23 phone data, right?

24 A. Correct.

25 Q. Then you talked also about information that


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1044

1 wasn't provided to you by the government but that you got

2 from T-Mobile?

3 A. Correct.

4 Q. Okay. Had you not had that information from

5 T-Mobile, let's say that you weren't able to obtain that from

6 them, okay, and you only had the information that you said

7 the government provided you, okay? Would you have been able

8 to generate this map that we're looking at?

9 A. In part, yes.

10 Q. And what parts wouldn't you have been able to

11 generate?

12 A. I'm sorry, I would or wouldn't?

13 Q. What part of the map would you not have been

14 able to generate?

15 A. I would not have been able to split the tower

16 up into the different pieces of pies that we talked about, or

17 I talked about, and which direction they faced. That's the

18 only difference.

19 Q So the actual locations of them you would be

20 able to do with just the information that was provided to

21 you?

22 A. The physical locations, the geographical

23 coordinates of the tower were provided by the information I

24 got from the defense that I understand was originally

25 provided by the government.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1045

1 Q. The additional information that you relied on,

2 in order to put this into the pie, you got from T-Mobile; is

3 that correct?

4 A. Correct. From a current T-Mobile database from

5 them.

6 Q. Okay. Thank you. That's what I was trying to

7 understand.

8 MR. HICKS: I'll withdraw my previous

9 objection.

10 THE COURT: Thank you. Then Defendant's

11 Exhibit R is admitted into evidence.

12 (Defendant's Exhibit R marked for

13 identification.)

14 MR. SWANSON: May I have permission to publish

15 Exhibit R to the jury?

16 THE COURT: You may publish.

17 Q. (By Mr. Swanson) If could you step down. This

18 is the map you produced, correct?

19 A. It is.

20 Q. And we have four towers?

21 A. Correct.

22 Q. Each tower is divided into three pie slices?

23 A. Correct.

24 Q. And then I see dates or times in blue and

25 orange in various places?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1046

1 A. Yes.

2 Q. What does the positions of those times show or

3 signify?

4 A. The times with the blue background show the

5 earliest times up through the chart when we read the bottom

6 of, I believe, 9:50 of -- may I get my printed map that's

7 been shown to me?

8 Q. Yes.

9 A. Thank you. From 5:07 through 5:50 have the

10 blue background and the orange-ish background is from 7:50

11 through 9:40 p.m.

12 Q. And could you show approximately where is Troy,

13 Missouri, located on this map? If you have a laser pointer,

14 that may help to demonstrate.

15 A. Yeah. I believe Troy is here. I don't have it

16 labeled on the map.

17 Q. And then -- but you do have "A, B, C, D, E, F",

18 correct?

19 A. Correct.

20 Q. "A" is 130 Sumac?

21 A. Correct.

22 Q. And where is "A" located?

23 A. Right here.

24 Q. And "B" is Number 2 Merlin Drive, the Conoco

25 located in Troy?
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1047

1 A. Correct.

2 Q. And that is --

3 A. Right here.

4 Q. "C" is the U-Gas on the Wentzville Parkway?

5 A. Yes.

6 Q. "D" is Greene's Country Store and Feed?

7 A. Yes.

8 Q. "E" is the approximate location of the QuikTrip

9 at Highway N and Highway 40?

10 A. Yes.

11 Q. And "F" is 909 Robert Raymond Drive, the

12 Arby's?

13 A. Yes.

14 Q. Okay. All right. And then there is a line

15 that shows Highway 40?

16 A. Yes.

17 Q. That is the yellow line that basically runs --

18 A. It comes down this way.

19 Q. So you can't say exactly where Mr. Faria's

20 phone was, but at 5:07, 5:08 and 5:10, approximately where

21 was it, what area?

22 A. The phone had to be somewhere in this area

23 here. It could not have been here or there.

24 Q. And it couldn't be any further south?

25 A. It could not be any further south than this


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1048

1 line.

2 Q. And that's the pie slice that encompasses Mr.

3 Faria's home?

4 A. Correct.

5 Q. 5:11, 5:13, 5:22, where was his phone?

6 A. His phone was in the, this would be the

7 southwest pie sector, so it was somewhere in here. It could

8 not have exceeded this yellow line over here. It could not

9 have been any further north than here.

10 Q. And that's approximately where the Conoco was?

11 A. Correct.

12 Q. At 5:50, can you say approximately where his

13 phone was?

14 A. At 5:50 his phone was in this area here. If

15 you notice there are two towers that are very close because

16 as we get into a densely populated area like St. Louis, they

17 put the towers much closer and the range is much smaller so

18 they can handle more calls.

19 So what happened is there was activity on his

20 phone that occurred in this sector, and then it moved to this

21 tower in this sector. So the phone activity had to be

22 somewhere, no further north than this line, no further

23 northwest than this line.

24 It could be northwest of this line here. It

25 could not have been over here, northeast from this tower. So
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1049

1 it was somewhere in here.

2 Q. So at 7:50, where was the phone?

3 A. At 7:50, it's in the sector here off this

4 tower. So it's somewhere following these lines. It's

5 somewhere in this geographical location. It could not be

6 here. It could not be here.

7 Q. And the next time the phone connects to a

8 tower, where is it, what area?

9 A. It is in the same sector off of this tower.

10 Q. Why would a phone connect to a tower?

11 A. Could you repeat that?

12 Q. Why would a phone connect to a tower?

13 A. A phone has to connect, obviously, to make

14 calls, text and data. A phone is going to connect to the

15 tower with the strongest signal.

16 So for communication it's going to, your phone

17 is constantly looking at many cell towers depending on where

18 you are located, and it's going to pick the one with the

19 strongest signal to make a call or your text or your data.

20 Q. So if you were to get an e-mail right now, your

21 phone would connect to the tower?

22 A. Yes.

23 Q. And it might do it just to check the time?

24 A. It could, yes.

25 Q. Get a tweet or do something. You don't have to


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1050

1 actually be using the phone. It can do it automatically?

2 A. Correct.

3 Q. But if you use the phone, it's going to

4 connect?

5 A. Correct.

6 Q. At 9:25, what area was the phone in?

7 A. The phone was east of this tower. It could not

8 have been here. It could not have been here. It came off of

9 this sector, so it's somewhere in here.

10 Q. So assuming the phone is in the car driving

11 north on Highway 40, how far north could it be at 9:25, the

12 furthest north it could be?

13 A. At 9:25, it could not exceed where this yellow

14 line is that goes into the next sector because the T-Mobile

15 data that I received from the defense that was provided from

16 the government shows it was in this sector at 9:25.

17 Q. And approximately how far is that tower from

18 the next tower up there in Troy?

19 A. It's approximately, if you are talking about

20 the northern tower, the northernmost tower I have, it's

21 approximately ten miles.

22 Q. So at 9:25, Russell Faria's phone was no, was

23 at least ten miles from his home?

24 A. Yes. With his home being up here, yes.

25 Q. And his phone did arrive back in that same home


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1051

1 quadrant at approximately 9:37?

2 A. Correct.

3 Q. So that's about a little more than ten miles he

4 would have to have covered in 12 minutes?

5 A. Correct. You might want to bring that down

6 because there's a little bit of data missing off the top.

7 There's your 9:37.

8 Q. And just to be clear, you don't have to be on

9 the phone? The phone is doing some things automatically?

10 A. Oh, absolutely. Mine and other phones, check

11 e-mail every five minutes or sometimes instantly when it

12 comes in or out.

13 Q. And then you were also provided some AT&T

14 records; is that correct?

15 A. That is correct.

16 Q. Those records were the records provided by the

17 government to the defense?

18 MR. HICKS: Your Honor, may we approach?

19 THE COURT: Yes.

20 (Discussion at the bench.)

21 MR. HICKS: I'm going to object for two

22 reasons. One is as to the pretrial Motion regarding Pam

23 Hupp. They're getting ready to get into Pam Hupp's phone

24 records and I think to try to identify the location of her

25 phone at 7:04 and 7:27 p.m.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1052

1 There would be no reason to do this other than

2 to suggest that she's the one who committed this murder, and

3 so based upon a pretrial Motion, I don't think it's relevant.

4 Second objection would be that is, again, if

5 he's relying upon information that I still claim is hearsay

6 because --

7 MR. SWANSON: I'll tell you just before I get

8 to it. All of the data that he used to present that was from

9 what you gave us. There was nothing else.

10 MR. HICKS: Okay. Then I still may object

11 based on the first one. I don't see the relevance based on

12 the State's pretrial Motion and the Court's Order.

13 MR. SCHWARTZ: Your Honor, the evidence that

14 came in from Mrs. Hupp, and I think the Court went into it

15 earlier today regarding the Motion, was she testified to the

16 police, she testified that she told the police that she

17 called Betsy Faria when she got home and then she said, well,

18 home free. I meant home free. Something along those lines.

19 Impeachment does not have to solely be

20 testimonial. We certainly have a right to impeach her with

21 any inconsistent document or any inconsistent statement, and

22 that's really all this is, is showing where her phone was at

23 these two calls.

24 THE COURT: The question would be, why are you

25 impeaching him because she herself admitted she just meant


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1053

1 "home free" which means she hit the highway.

2 MR. SCHWARTZ: I think because she said we have

3 the right to follow up and the jury can determine what "home

4 free" is.

5 THE COURT: Why are you following up? She said

6 after she was Crossed, she was like, that's not what I meant.

7 MR. SCHWARTZ: The evidence is going to show

8 she was still not into Troy.

9 MS. ASKEY: I would disagree for two things.

10 Number one, she said, when I got to the Interstate I was home

11 free. The closest Interstate to us is I-70. You'd have to

12 go down Highway J, which you would remain in the same

13 quadrant. She said nothing about Highway 61.

14 THE COURT: She didn't say "J" She said she

15 was at a point where she knew from that she could navigate

16 herself home free.

17 MR. HICKS: Again, that would be left to the

18 jury to determine.

19 THE COURT: I don't follow that.

20 MR. SCHWARTZ: Okay. Once we rest, can we at

21 least do an Offer of Proof to do that?

22 THE COURT: You can do an Offer of Proof.

23 MR. SCHWARTZ: Okay.

24 THE COURT: Objection was sustained.

25 (End of bench discussion.)


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1054

1 MR. SWANSON: No further questions, Your Honor.

2 MR. HICKS: You can have a seat.

3 THE COURT: Thank you. State?

4 CROSS-EXAMINATION

5 BY MR. HICKS:

6 Q. You mentioned in Direct testimony you mentioned

7 that you had been hired by the defendant here to testify here

8 today, correct?

9 A. Correct.

10 Q. And you said you were getting paid?

11 A. Correct.

12 Q. Are you getting paid an hourly wage or a flat

13 fee?

14 A. Both.

15 Q. Both. So tell us about your hourly wage? How

16 much is your hourly wage?

17 A. It depends on where I do the work. If I do the

18 work in the lab, it's 250 an hour.

19 If I do work outside the lab, it's 350 and one

20 day of testimony is 1,500.

21 Q. All right. So let's start with lab work. How

22 much lab work have you done in this case?

23 A. I don't know.

24 Q. Okay. Give me a ballpark.

25 A. I can't. This is very tedious work to do


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1055

1 accurately. All I have is time sheets and I wasn't requested

2 to bring them.

3 Q. So you have no idea how much time you have

4 spent in the lab on this case?

5 A. No.

6 Q. Five hours?

7 A. You're probably in the ballpark.

8 Q. Okay. So that would be 1,200; $1,250, right?

9 A. Correct.

10 Q. How much time have you spent outside the lab on

11 this case?

12 A. I would estimate, excluding today, two hours.

13 Q. Okay. So that's another $700. That's 1,950

14 and you said your flat fee for today is what?

15 A. One Thousand Five Hundred.

16 Q. So you are getting paid 3,000. Running those

17 numbers, it looks like it's $3,450; almost $3,500. Maybe a

18 little less, maybe a little more because you haven't kept

19 track. Well, you have kept track but don't have that

20 information here, correct?

21 A. There's items that have not been billed, so I

22 can't attest to that, if that figure is correct or not.

23 Q. What items have not been billed? What do you

24 mean?

25 A. I have not invoiced, Counselor, the defendant


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1056

1 for all of the work that's been done to date.

2 Q. Is there any work in addition, is there any

3 work that you wouldn't, have we covered everything in the

4 lab, outside the lab and testifying?

5 A. Yes.

6 Q. Okay. Do you primarily testify for -- you said

7 you have testified before as an expert in this area, correct?

8 A. Correct.

9 Q. You primarily testify for -- primarily for

10 defendants, don't you?

11 A. Yes. Because I'm not a sworn Police Officer.

12 Q. You don't believe you could testify on behalf

13 of the State of Missouri because you are not a sworn Police

14 Officer?

15 A. Not at any venue that I have done a case in

16 because there are law enforcement labs already in place that

17 process this for the Prosecutors.

18 Q. I understand there are law enforcement labs

19 that process this, but I'm saying there's no prohibition

20 legally to keep you from testifying on behalf of the State if

21 they were to employ your services, correct?

22 A. Correct.

23 Q. And so you primarily testify for the defense?

24 A. Correct.

25 Q. Okay. In fact, over the lunch hour, my


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1057

1 colleague here tried to speak with you. I don't know which

2 Defendant's Exhibit it is. It's this one.

3 MR. HICKS: Do you have it up here?

4 MR. SCHWARTZ: "R".

5 MR. HICKS: "R".

6 Q. (By Mr. Hicks) Do you remember, it was just an

7 hour and a half ago when this lady over here tried to speak

8 with you back there in the office about this map?

9 A. It was not that map she showed me.

10 Q. It was not this map she showed you?

11 A. No, sir.

12 Q. Okay. Well, she did attempt to speak with you,

13 right?

14 A. She did.

15 Q. And she was asking you about these quadrants?

16 A. Could you rephrase the question?

17 Q. She was asking you about these pieces of the

18 pie. She asked you a question about that. Do you remember

19 that?

20 A. She asked me about one piece of one pie.

21 Q. Okay.

22 A. On a map that I haven't seen you show me yet.

23 Q. Okay. Your response to her was, well, I don't

24 have to talk to you, right?

25 A. No. My response was that that is, from memory,


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1058

1 that is the correct geographical location of the tower. And

2 her question was concerning defense trial strategy material

3 that I did not feel that she was entitled to know until we

4 were here in Court.

5 Q. Defense trial strategy. So you are part of the

6 defense trial strategy team?

7 A. I am working for the defense as a witness.

8 Q. Okay. So the State has many witnesses that the

9 defense talks to. I'm trying to figure out -- wasn't your

10 response to Ms. Askey is that, just find out in Court what

11 I'm going to say?

12 A. As far as one specific question, yes.

13 Q. Okay. And I suppose that's because you

14 perceive us as the government?

15 A. Not at all.

16 Q. Well, you keep referring to us as "the

17 government".

18 A. Well, I think it's a phrase that most people

19 understand. When you say "the government", it's pretty much

20 all encompassing.

21 Q. The title of this case is "State of Missouri

22 versus Russell Faria". It's not the government. It's the

23 State of Missouri, the people. Do you recognize the

24 difference?

25 A. I think it's all the same.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1059

1 MR. HICKS: I don't have anything further.

2 THE COURT: Mr. Schwartz or Swanson.

3 REDIRECT EXAMINATION

4 BY MR. SWANSON:

5 Q. You were hired by the defense. We have no

6 question about that?

7 A. Correct.

8 Q. Did that influence your analysis at all?

9 A. Not at all. I'm a fact finder whether I do

10 cell mapping or forensics. The fact is the facts, the data

11 is the data.

12 Q. That data that we provide, that was the data

13 provided by the State or the government or law enforcement,

14 not I don't think the People arrested anyone?

15 A. That is my understanding.

16 Q. Would your answers have been any different if

17 you had been hired by the State?

18 A. No.

19 MR. SWANSON: Nothing further.

20 THE COURT: State?

21 RECROSS-EXAMINATION

22 BY MR. HICKS:

23 Q. How would we know? You've never been hired by

24 the State?

25 A You should hire me.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1060

1 Q. You said you wouldn't do it.

2 A. I would if I could, but they always give it to

3 the Regional Crime Lab, such as the one in St. Charles,

4 Detective Roth, who did huge maps for you, I believe.

5 MR. HICKS: Nothing further.

6 THE COURT: Mr. Schwartz?

7 MR. SCHWARTZ: No.

8 THE COURT: Thank you. May this witness be

9 released?

10 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, Your Honor.

11 THE COURT: Thank you, sir. You are

12 released.

13 THE WITNESS: Thank you, Your Honor.

14 THE COURT: They are indicating they may

15 possibly need you to do one more thing.

16 Did you want to do that now or wait? How many

17 more do you have? So do you want to break and do this Offer

18 of Proof.

19 (Off the record discussion at the bench.)

20 THE COURT: Thank you, sir. If you would just

21 stick around shortly. They are going to put on another

22 witness and come back briefly and then you'll be finished.

23 THE WITNESS: Certainly, Your Honor.

24 MR. SCHWARTZ: Your Honor, at this time the

25 defense would rest.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1061

1 THE COURT: Thank you.

2 Does he necessarily need to leave the

3 Courtroom?

4 MR. SCHWARTZ: It would probably be best if he

5 waits outside.

6 THE COURT: If you could wait outside.

7 Rebuttal evidence, then, on behalf of the

8 State.

9 MS. ASKEY: Yes, Your Honor. State would call

10 Detective Pat Harney.

11 THE COURT: Detective Pat Harney, please.

12 Please come forward and raise your right hand to be sworn.

13 PATRICK HARNEY,

14 a witness, having been duly sworn by the Circuit Clerk to

15 tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so

16 help you God, under the pain and penalty of the Perjury Laws

17 of Missouri, testifies as follows:

18 THE COURT: State may proceed when you are

19 ready.

20 DIRECT EXAMINATION

21 BY MS. ASKEY:

22 Q. Detective Harney, please state your name for

23 the record.

24 A. Patrick Harney.

25 Q. Where are you employed?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1062

1 A. Lincoln County Sheriff's Office.

2 Q. And what is your capacity there?

3 A. I'm a Detective.

4 Q. How long have you been a Detective?

5 A. About three and a half years.

6 Q. And occasionally in that employment, do you run

7 down leads on cases for the Prosecutor's office?

8 A. Yes, ma'am.

9 Q. Did you have the opportunity to do that

10 today?

11 A. Yes, I did.

12 Q. Was that in relationship to products sold at

13 Conoco in Troy, the QuikTrip in Lake St. Louis and the U-Gas

14 on Wentzville Parkway?

15 A. Yes, ma'am.

16 Q. And specifically, what did you inquire of those

17 locations this morning?

18 A. If they sold Brisk brand tea and how much is

19 the cost of a pack or a carton of Edgefield cigarettes was on

20 December 27th, 2011.

21 Q. And specifically, Edgefield cigarettes, the

22 brand of cigarettes that were purchased from the U-Gas on

23 Wentzville Parkway on December 27th, 2011?

24 A. Yes. As I understand, yes.

25 Q. The Brisk tea, was that purchased from the


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1063

1 QuikTrip in Lake St. Louis; is that right?

2 A. As I understand, yes.

3 Q. Detective Harney, can you tell the jury the

4 difference in price on December 27th, 2011, in a carton of

5 Edgefield cigarettes from the Conoco in Troy, Missouri, and

6 the U-Gas on Wentzville Parkway?

7 A. U-Gas was 60 cents cheaper per carton.

8 Q. Sixty cents?

9 A. Yes, ma'am.

10 Q. How many miles is it from Troy to

11 Wentzville?

12 A. The sign I could picture in my mind is 14.

13 Q. And the defendant was driving a 19 --, mid-'80s

14 model SUV; is that right?

15 A. As I recall, I think it was a '90s model.

16 Q. Older '90s; is that right?

17 A. Yes, ma'am.

18 Q. Do you remember what the price of fuel was back

19 then, Detective?

20 A. No, I do not.

21 Q. What I should ask you is, do you recall a time

22 when fuel has been less than $3 a gallon?

23 A. Not until recently.

24 MS. ASKEY: Nothing further.

25 THE COURT: Mr. Schwartz?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1064

1 CROSS-EXAMINATION

2 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

3 Q. Officer Harney, you watched that video. You

4 saw Russell Faria go into the Conoco, didn't you?

5 A. No. I don't recall watching that video, sir.

6 Q. Would it surprise you to know he didn't go into

7 the Conoco? My point is, Officer Harney, you have no idea if

8 he knows what's sold at the Conoco, do you?

9 A. I don't what know Russ Faria knows.

10 Q. Exactly. You didn't look at his bank records

11 to see how often he goes to U-Gas to buy cigarettes, did you?

12 A. Not that I recall, no.

13 Q. What's that?

14 A. Not that I recall, no.

15 Q. What's the price of the Brisk tea at U-Gas?

16 A. That was not the question I asked.

17 Q. Do you know if they have it?

18 A. If you give me a second. They did sell that

19 tea on December 27th, 2011.

20 Q. And do you know if Russell Faria was thirsty

21 when he went into the U-Gas at that point in time?

22 A. I don't have any idea when Russ Faria is

23 thirsty.

24 Q. No. You just know that he bought cigarettes

25 there and they were 60 cents cheaper than the Conoco?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1065

1 A. I've not seen the receipt.

2 Q. Are you on the videotape at the U-Gas?

3 A. Am I on the video tape?

4 Q. You went in there today at U-Gas?

5 A. No, sir.

6 Q. When did go there?

7 A. I did not go there.

8 Q. Didn't you just say you went to U-Gas to

9 determine the price of some cigarettes?

10 A. I spoke with them on the phone today.

11 Q. You spoke with them on the phone today. Got

12 it. Did you go to Conoco?

13 A. Yes, I did.

14 Q. Are you on the video there?

15 A. I have not seen the video so I don't know.

16 Q. You don't know if it's functioning. You don't

17 know if it was shooting where you were standing, do you?

18 A. No, I don't.

19 Q. Did you go there to get on the video?

20 A. No. I went there to get the information the

21 Prosecutor asked for.

22 MR. SCHWARTZ: Nothing further.

23 THE COURT: State?

24 MS. ASKEY: Nothing further.

25 THE COURT: May this witness be released?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1066

1 MS. ASKEY: Yes, Your Honor.

2 THE COURT: Thank you, sir. You are released.

3 Further rebuttal evidence?

4 MS. ASKEY: No, Your Honor.

5 THE COURT: Anything further on behalf of the

6 defendant?

7 MR. SCHWARTZ: No, Your Honor.

8 THE COURT: Thank you.

9 MR. SCHWARTZ: Other than a brief Motion.

10 THE COURT: Would you like to take up your

11 Motion at this time?

12 MR. SCHWARTZ: I thought you wanted to go on a

13 break.

14 THE COURT: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury,

15 at this time we are going to take another break, at least

16 for the jurors, as the counsel proceeds with some other

17 matters.

18 The Court again reminds you of what you were

19 told at the first recess of the Court. Until you retire to

20 consider your verdict, you must not discuss this case among

21 yourselves or with others or permit anyone to discuss it in

22 your hearing. You should not form or express any opinion

23 about the case until it is finally given to you to decide.

24 Do not do any research or investigation on your

25 own about any matter regarding this case or anyone involved


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1067

1 with the trial. Do not communicate with others about the

2 case by any means. Do not read, view or listen to any

3 newspaper, radio, electronic communication from the Internet

4 or television report of the trial.

5 The Court will then be at recess until the

6 jurors are notified. Thank you.

7 (The jurors left the Courtroom.)

8 THE COURT: We are on the record outside the

9 presence of the jury in 12L6-CR01312, State of Missouri

10 versus Russell S. Faria, and the defense has recalled a

11 witness. Could you state your name again, please?

12 THE WITNESS: Greg Chatten.

13 THE COURT: Greg Chatten, for purposes of

14 making an Offer of Proof. You may proceed.

15 MR. SWANSON: Thank you, Your Honor.

16 DIRECT EXAMINATION

17 BY MR. SWANSON:

18 Q. Mr. Chatten, in addition to the T-Mobile

19 records we discussed previously, you were also provided

20 records for an AT&T phone number; is that correct?

21 A. Correct.

22 Q. And that -- in particular, that number was for

23 Pamela Hupp; is that correct?

24 A. May I see the exhibit, please?

25 MR. SCHWARTZ: I think the Court put on the


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1068

1 record that this is out of the hearing of the jury and an

2 Offer of Proof.

3 THE COURT: Yes.

4 Sir, I will remind you again, I don't remember

5 if I did, but just to remind you that you are still under

6 oath.

7 THE WITNESS: Yes, Your Honor.

8 THE COURT: Thank you.

9 Q. (By Mr. Swanson) If you turn to the back of

10 that, there's subscriber information?

11 A. Yes.

12 Q. And the AT&T records you were provided were for

13 a phone number ending, the phone number associated with a

14 woman named Pamela Hupp?

15 A. Yes.

16 Q. What was the phone number?

17 A. (636) 448-5241.

18 Q. And there was another number, "5242"; is that

19 correct?

20 A. Yes.

21 Q. Referring specifically to the number ending in:

22 "42" and the date 12/27/2011?

23 A. Yes.

24 Q. You were provided that information?

25 A. Correct.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1069

1 Q. And T-Mobile is different from AT&T; is that

2 correct?

3 A. Correct.

4 Q. How is it different?

5 A. They are different carriers, some of the

6 technology, some use different antennas, different equipment.

7 Q. But the principle is the same? There's a

8 tower, different slices of pie?

9 A. Yes.

10 Q. The information you were provided, did that

11 include GPS locations for the towers?

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. Did it include the azimuth information

14 basically that would give you the slice of the pie?

15 A. Yes.

16 Q. And it tells you if a call starts in one slice

17 of the pie and ends in a different slice?

18 A. Correct.

19 Q. On December 27th, 2011, Ms. Hupp made a phone

20 call at 7:04; is that correct?

21 A. Let me refer to my notes. My copy of the map

22 is not here.

23 MR. SWANSON: May I approach, Your Honor?

24 THE COURT: Yes.

25 A. Yes, 7:04.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1070

1 Q. (By Mr. Swanson) She made another call at

2 7:27?

3 A. Correct.

4 Q. And you were able to map the tower those calls

5 connected to?

6 A. Correct.

7 Q. And the slice of the pie they were in?

8 A. Correct.

9 Q. And that's the map you have in front of you,

10 Defendant's Exhibit S?

11 A. Yes.

12 Q. And the slice of the pie, those calls were in?

13 A. Yes.

14 Q. Does that encompass where the Faria household

15 was at 130 Sumac Drive?

16 A. Yes. I have incorrectly listed as 120, but

17 it's 130.

18 Q. Could those calls have taken place when Ms.

19 Hupp's phone was in Troy, Missouri?

20 A. No.

21 Q. Could those calls have taken place when Ms.

22 Hupp was on Highway 61, south of Troy? I'll specify that.

23 A. No.

24 Q. Could those calls have taken place when Ms.

25 Hupp was home in O'Fallon?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1071

1 A. No.

2 Q. Both of those calls took place in the exact

3 same sector which includes the Faria home?

4 A. Correct.

5 Q. All right.

6 MR. SWANSON: Nothing further.

7 THE COURT: State?

8 CROSS-EXAMINATION

9 BY MR. HICKS:

10 Q. What causes what is known as a "dropped call"?

11 You know, I'm on the phone with somebody and suddenly, boom,

12 it's dropped.

13 A. As calls are made and received, they are routed

14 through different equipment, different switches depending on

15 if you are calling California, you're calling next door, you

16 are calling New York.

17 If any of those -- I'm trying to answer your

18 question, but if any of those, you know, pieces of equipment

19 have a failure, you could get a dropped call.

20 You could also get a dropped call -- say you

21 were on a two-lane highway and you've got a semi,

22 tractor-trailer next to you and, you know, your phone power,

23 the signal, you know, gets blocked or, you know, reflected.

24 Also, the condition and age of your phone.

25 Q. Okay. Does it have anything to do with the


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1072

1 cell towers, the location, in relationship to the phone at

2 all?

3 A. Rarely because of the way they redesigned the

4 cell system, everything is overlapped so that there's

5 continuous service down most interstates, major highways,

6 populated areas.

7 Q. Can a cell tower be so -- I don't know what the

8 correct word is and I'm not trying to be difficult with you

9 here. Can a cell tower be so busy that you are unable to

10 connect to it?

11 A. A particular tower, yeah. Specific tower, yes.

12 Q. I thought I had heard that before. I mean,

13 like when you go to the Mizzou games because everybody is

14 there, 60, 70 thousand people, it's hard to make a phone call

15 and get a data connection because everybody is trying to off

16 the same tower there?

17 A. Right.

18 Q. So what happens when a section of this pie is

19 real busy? Does the phone have the ability to hook in with

20 another piece of that pie? Does that make sense?

21 A. Not that piece of a pie, but another cell

22 tower, yes.

23 Q. All right. So if a cell tower is busy, it's

24 busy all around the pie, not just one area?

25 A. No. It could be one sector of the pie. If I


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1073

1 may use an example, Busch Stadium, if everybody is trying to

2 make a call and let's say in theory there was only one piece

3 of pie that covered it, it would become obviously overloaded.

4 Those other calls, even though the signal would

5 be weaker, would end up going to the next tower with the

6 strongest signal because the normal one with the strongest

7 signal is totally overloaded. So the call would get thrown

8 to another one.

9 Q. But it wouldn't get, it's your testimony it

10 wouldn't get thrown to another quadrant or another section of

11 that pie in that same tower?

12 A. No. Because the antennas are entirely

13 directional. That's the way the entire cell system is

14 designed, is with directional antennas as opposed to what

15 they call omnidirectional, where -- omnidirectional is where

16 it's a circle and the radio waves go out 360 degrees.

17 The whole purpose of the cellular network is,

18 as you pointed out, to handle so many users in a specific

19 sector and it has to do with how much power, there's lower

20 power, higher power. There's so many things that could

21 affect that but, no, it would not jump to another sector

22 simply because one was overloaded, another sector on the same

23 tower.

24 Q. Okay. Last question is, when you draw these

25 pies in sectors, I mean, it's not -- it's not that exact, is


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1074

1 it? Meaning that you could be close and maybe getting into

2 that sector. Do you follow what I'm saying?

3 I mean, we look at this map here and we've got

4 these sectors drawn and it's kind of like, no, if they are

5 even barely over on the other side of that yellow line

6 there's no way that they are hooking into the quadrant on the

7 other side of that yellow line. I'm saying it's not quite as

8 exact as the map makes it, is it?

9 A. No.

10 Q. Okay. Thanks.

11 MR. HICKS: Nothing further.

12 THE COURT: Mr. Schwartz, Mr. Swanson?

13 REDIRECT EXAMINATION

14 BY MR. SWANSON:

15 Q. When you say it's not that exact, the record

16 would reflect if you crossed over into the other slice of the

17 pie?

18 A. Absolutely. If your phone -- for example, if

19 I'm connected to one tower right now, theoretically, and I

20 took a step off this stand, I may go to another sector on

21 that tower.

22 Q. If the line is right between those?

23 A. Right. Or whatever, you know, whenever you

24 move into the other sector, the call is going, the call

25 detail records are going to show that a new call was made
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1075

1 from that sector or that it's switched. You are in one phone

2 call.

3 If you drive around in a circle and you're in

4 the same call, it's going to show you keep switching sectors

5 at different dates and times.

6 Q. In this case, none of those calls show those

7 changes. Neither of those calls?

8 A. Not on this map.

9 Q. And so geographically, the same sector?

10 A. Correct.

11 MR. SWANSON: Nothing further.

12 MR. HICKS: Nothing further, Your Honor.

13 THE COURT: Anything further? May this witness

14 be released at this time?

15 MR. SWANSON: Yes, Your Honor.

16 THE COURT: Thank you, sir. You are released.

17 You are free to go or stay as you choose.

18 THE WITNESS: Thank you, Your Honor.

19 MS. ASKEY: Judge, may we approach?

20 THE COURT: Yes.

21 (Discussion at the bench.)

22 MS. ASKEY: This is something that Richard and

23 I were talking about that came to my attention. Obviously,

24 the defendant has rested and we don't have any objection to

25 them reopening based on the fact that the defendant has


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1076

1 chosen not to testify.

2 We would certainly like him to do that

3 verbally.

4 THE COURT: Make a record.

5 MS. ASKEY: Right. Acknowledge the fact that

6 he knows he has the right to testify and he's choosing to

7 waive that right at this point.

8 MR. SCHWARTZ: Judge, I will talk on the

9 record. I would request that the Court not voir dire my

10 client regarding it. He could be in the presence of us, if

11 it's okay. And I will --

12 THE COURT: As long as you cover it thoroughly.

13 MR. SCHWARTZ: Okay.

14 THE COURT: Do we want to do that now?

15 MR. SCHWARTZ: That's fine.

16 THE COURT: We're not doing that with them in

17 here.

18 MR. SCHWARTZ: I also would request the Court

19 leave to file the Motion for Judgment of Acquittal at the

20 Close of All of the Evidence.

21 MR. HICKS: Before we take up that Motion,

22 again, I want to reiterate. I know the Court is going to do

23 it. I appreciate Mr. Schwartz's position on this.

24 However, I think for potential appellate

25 purposes, my experience has always been that there's a record


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1077

1 made with the defendant under oath regarding his right. That

2 he understands that he has a right to testify, and because of

3 this --

4 THE COURT: Right.

5 MR. HICKS: This is not something the defense

6 attorney can speak for him on his behalf.

7 THE COURT: Correct. He has to do it.

8 MR. HICKS: I trust Mr. Schwartz that he's

9 fully talked to him about it, but I'm just more comfortable

10 if we actually make a record with the defendant under oath.

11 THE COURT: I think that's what he just said,

12 prior to you submitting the Motion.

13 MS. ASKEY: No. He said he wanted to speak for

14 him.

15 MR. SCHWARTZ: I said I want to speak for

16 him.

17 THE COURT: I don't know that you can do that.

18 Actually, I just looked that up. I'm not going to ask him

19 anything. Are you going to ask him anything?

20 MS. ASKEY: No, I'm not. He needs to.

21 THE COURT: So I think he needs to be sworn in

22 and do it.

23 MR. SCHWARTZ: That's fine. It's over my

24 objection.

25 THE COURT: Note the objection.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1078

1 RUSSELL S. FARIA,

2 a witness, having been duly sworn by the Circuit Judge to

3 tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so

4 help you God, under the pain and penalty of the Perjury Laws

5 of Missouri, testifies as follows:

6 DIRECT EXAMINATION

7 BY MR. SCHWARTZ:

8 Q. Would you state your name for the record?

9 A. Russell Faria.

10 Q. And Russell, your attorney is me. What's my

11 name?

12 A. Joel Schwartz.

13 Q. You and I have had extensive discussions

14 regarding your rights to testify?

15 A. Yes, sir.

16 q. You understand that you have an absolute right

17 to testify and an absolute right not to testify?

18 A. Yes, sir.

19 Q. And based upon our discussions, have you

20 yourself made a decision as to what you have chosen?

21 A. Yes, sir.

22 Q. And what is that decision?

23 A. Not to testify.

24 Q. With a full understanding that you do have that

25 ultimate right if you choose or desire to testify?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1079

1 A. Yes, sir.

2 MR. SCHWARTZ: That's it.

3 MR. HICKS: State is satisfied. Thank you.

4 THE COURT: Thank you, sir.

5 Do you want to file your Motion?

6 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, Judge. I would file a

7 Motion for Judgment of Acquittal at the Close of the State's

8 Evidence.

9 MR. SWANSON: Copies will be provided to the

10 State.

11 THE COURT: Motion of Judgment of Acquittal at

12 the Close of the Evidence is filed.

13 At this time, the Motion for Judgment of

14 Acquittal at the Close of the Evidence is denied.

15 (End of bench discussion.)

16 (The jury entered the Courtroom.)

17 THE COURT: Thank you. You may be seated.

18 One more time, we will ask the jurors to raise

19 their hand as we call their number for the record. Juror

20 Number 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 15, 27, 29, 35, 38, Juror 39, Juror

21 44, Juror 51, Juror 58 and 61.

22 For the record, all jurors are present.

23 Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, at this time

24 because Counsel has to create some paperwork and do other

25 things that could take quite a while, it's been determined


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1080

1 that we're going to release you for tonight.

2 Tomorrow when you get back, you will hear a

3 closing argument and then you will begin to deliberate. So

4 because of that, we're only requesting that you be here by

5 9:00 because it shouldn't, as far as what we have to do, it

6 will be short. However long you deliberate is going to be up

7 to you.

8 I'm going to read you the instruction one more

9 time and then if you would please be present by 9:00 a.m.

10 tomorrow.

11 The Court again reminds you of what you were

12 told at the first recess of Court. Until you retire to

13 consider your verdict, you must not discuss this case among

14 yourselves or with others or permit anyone to discuss it in

15 your hearing. You should not form or express any opinion

16 about the case until it is finally given to you to decide.

17 Do not do any research or investigation on your

18 own about any matter regarding this case or anyone involved

19 with the trial. Do not communicate with others about the

20 case by any means. Do not read, view or listen to any

21 newspaper, radio, electronic communication from the Internet

22 or television report of the trial.

23 Thank you and we'll see you back here at 9:00

24 a.m.

25 (The jurors left the Courtroom.)


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1081

1 (Recess.)

2 THE COURT: We are back on the record in

3 12L6-CR01312, State of Missouri versus Russell S. Faria.

4 Outside the presence of the jury, we have had

5 an instruction conference. At this time, we want to

6 memorialize what the agreement is by the parties as to what

7 instructions will be used and the order they will be used.

8 Tomorrow when we come in, each party will have

9 a clean copy of all the instructions we talk about today in

10 their correct order and we will, once again, in the morning

11 verify we're in agreement that we have a complete, correct,

12 clean set.

13 Now for the record, Instruction No. 1 that will

14 go back to the jury is 302.01 with Notetaking.

15 Instruction that is numbered No. 2 is 302.02,

16 which is Evidence and Rulings of the Court.

17 Instruction 3 will be 302.03, which are the

18 General Instructions.

19 Instruction 4 will be 302.04, which is the

20 Burden of Proof and Related Matters.

21 Instruction 5 will be 314.02, the Murder in the

22 First Degree Verdict Director.

23 Instruction No. 6 will be 308.02, which is the

24 Defendant's Converse to Murder in the First Degree.

25 Instruction No. 7 is 314.04, which is the


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1082

1 instruction for Murder in the Second Degree, the Verdict

2 Director by the State.

3 Instruction No. 8 is the Defendant's Converse

4 to Murder in the Second Degree.

5 Instruction No. 9 is -- and I'm sorry. No. 8

6 is 308.02.

7 No. 9 is 332.02. That is the instruction on

8 Armed Criminal Action on Murder First.

9 MR. HICKS: That's 9.

10 THE COURT: That's No. 9.

11 And No. 10 is the instruction on Armed Criminal

12 Action Murder Second, and that is also 332.02. Both of

13 those, 9 and 10, are as to State's Count II.

14 Instruction No. 11 is Defendant's 308.04. Is

15 that the alibi?

16 MR. SWANSON: That is the alibi instruction,

17 Your Honor. That is a non-MAI instruction slightly modified

18 from 308.04.

19 THE COURT: Okay. And my understanding is that

20 both parties were in agreement as to that modification and

21 that that instruction is proper and it is proper to be No.

22 11; is that correct?

23 MR. HICKS: Yes, Your Honor.

24 THE COURT: So State says "yes" and defendant

25 says "yes"?
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1083

1 MR. SWANSON: Yes, Your Honor.

2 THE COURT: And then Instruction No. 12 is

3 defendant's instruction regarding the fact that the defendant

4 has the right not to testify and no presumption of guilt may

5 be raised and no inference of any kind may be drawn from the

6 fact that Russell Faria did not testify, and that is

7 Instruction 308.14; is that correct?

8 MR. HICKS: Yes.

9 MR. SWANSON: Yes, Your Honor.

10 THE COURT: There is no objection to that being

11 No. 12; is that correct? By either party?

12 MR. HICKS: Right.

13 MR. SWANSON: No objection.

14 THE COURT: Instruction No. 13 is 304.12. That

15 is regarding One Defendant, Multiple Counts, Separate

16 Verdicts.

17 No. 14 will be 302.05 regarding Unanimous

18 Verdict.

19 Instruction 15 will be 302.06, Argument of

20 Counsel.

21 Instruction 16 is reserved at this time. That

22 would be the Hammer Instruction, if it is used in the form.

23 If it is used, it will be 312.10.

24 At this point in the progression, we don't know

25 if the Hammer will be used or not, but the next form that the
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1084

1 jurors would have is 304.44, and that will be unmarked but

2 basically it's a verdict form stating that, as to Count I,

3 the jury finds the defendant not guilty.

4 And then the second, we're calling it Verdict

5 Form but it will not have a heading when the jurors have it,

6 is relating to Count I in the jury finding the defendant

7 guilty of Murder in the First Degree as submitted in

8 Instruction No. 5.

9 The next verdict form that will not be marked

10 as a verdict form will be the jury's choice of finding the

11 defendant guilty of Murder in the Second Degree as submitted

12 in Instruction 7, and that's also 304.44, as was 1 and 2 of

13 this set. Those verdict forms are all 304.44 as to 1, 2 and

14 3.

15 As to the fourth verdict form, which will not

16 be designated as verdict form, that is 304.48. That is as to

17 Count II, giving the jury the option to find the defendant

18 not guilty of Armed Criminal Action.

19 The next instruction will be 304.48, giving the

20 jury the option as to Count II of finding the defendant

21 guilty of Armed Criminal Action as submitted in Instruction

22 No. 9, which would mean they had also found him guilty of

23 Murder First.

24 That instruction or form will also instruct

25 them that if they had not, that unless they have found the
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1085

1 defendant guilty of Murder First as submitted in Instruction

2 5, they may not complete this verdict, finding the defendant

3 guilty of Armed Criminal Action as submitted in Instruction

4 9.

5 The last verdict form, which will not be

6 designated as a verdict form, is giving the jury the option

7 as to Count II, to fine the defendant guilty of Armed

8 Criminal Action as submitted in instruction No. 10, and it is

9 also noting that unless they found the defendant guilty of

10 Murder in the Second Degree as submitted in Instruction No.

11 7, they may not complete this verdict finding the defendant

12 guilty of Armed Criminal Action as submitted in Instruction

13 10, and that is 304.48.

14 And then going down after the finding of guilt

15 or not, if there is a finding of guilt, the first Instruction

16 will be 305.01, and that will be No. 16 if the Hammer

17 Instruction was not used.

18 It will be No. 17 if the Hammer was used and

19 the appropriate Instruction of 305.01 will be given

20 determined upon whether they find the defendant guilty of

21 Murder in the First Degree or the Second Degree.

22 The next Instruction, which will be numbered

23 subsequently, will be 305.02 regarding Explanation of Order

24 of Proceedings when Evidence Will Be Presented.

25 Next will be Instruction 305.03, the Verdict


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1086

1 Mechanics.

2 The next will be 305.04, Argument of Counsel.

3 Next will be 305.07, the Verdict Possibilities,

4 and then the last document submitted to the jury will be

5 304.40 with one Instruction asking the jury to declare

6 punishment for Murder in the Second Degree.

7 And then 304.40 will also be submitted to the

8 jury as to Count II asking them to assess punishment for

9 Armed Criminal Action.

10 Does that accurately reflect all the

11 Instructions in the order that has been agreed upon by the

12 State?

13 MR. HICKS: Yes, Your Honor.

14 THE COURT: By defense?

15 MR. SWANSON: Yes, Your Honor.

16 THE COURT: Is there anything the Court stated

17 that we believe, at this point, that is incorrect. State?

18 MR. HICKS: Not at this point, Your Honor.

19 THE COURT: Defense?

20 MR. SWANSON: Not at this point. I would add

21 just -- defendant did file a written request for jury, for

22 certain jury instructions and you received that and that was

23 the basis for some of the inclusions.

24 THE COURT: That's correct and that was file

25 stamped today.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1087

1 Tomorrow everybody will obtain a clean copy of

2 all of these Instructions. Please review them so that when

3 we get in here, we can agree that we have a final original

4 set or, I guess, what we need is the one final set.

5 So you have each viewed that set, get them to

6 me, I'll, again, compare them to these and on the record

7 we'll say, yes, this is the final set.

8 (Court is in recess.)

9 ***

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1088

1 (The following proceedings were taken on

2 November 21, 2013, in State versus Russell S. Faria, with

3 Judge Mennemeyer presiding in the Circuit Court of Lincoln

4 County, State of Missouri.)

5 (The following proceedings were taken at the

6 bench:)

7 THE COURT: We are on the record then in

8 12L6-CR001312, State of Missouri versus Russell Faria, and we

9 have just had a jury instruction conference, and it's the

10 Court's understanding the Court now has in front of it

11 Instructions Numbered 1 through 15 as well as the actual

12 forms that the jury will sign.

13 Counsel for both sides have gone through all of

14 the instructions. It's the Court's understanding that I have

15 a true and accurate, clean copy that will go back to the

16 jury, so I'm going to hand this stack to the State and ask

17 the State to verify that is a true and accurate, complete

18 copy of all of the Instructions.

19 MR. RICKS: It is, Your Honor.

20 THE COURT: If the defense could also verify

21 that?

22 MR. SWANSON: I'll verify it's a clean copy,

23 Your Honor.

24 THE COURT: All right. The Court has

25 also been supplied with a Hammer Instruction, which is


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1089

1 MAI CR-3rd 312.10. Can the State just verify if that were

2 needed, that would be the instruction that we would read?

3 MR. Hicks: Yes, Your Honor.

4 THE COURT: And the defense?

5 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, Your Honor.

6 THE COURT: The Court will take up any

7 subsequent instructions if and when we need those. At this

8 time, are there any other matters before the jury is called

9 back in for closing arguments?

10 MR. SWANSON: There may be, Your Honor. Could

11 we go off the record real fast?

12 THE COURT: Yes.

13 (Off the record discussion.)

14 THE COURT: We are back on the record and

15 Counsel had discussed both yesterday and this morning that in

16 closing arguments, neither party will make any reference to

17 that someone else could have committed this incident or who

18 else could have other than the accused.

19 MR. SWANSON: I do think we might make the

20 argument that someone else must have done it because we've

21 established an alibi defense, but pursuant to the Court's

22 previous Order, which has been argued at length, we're not

23 specifying the person.

24 MR. HICKS: And again, I think that the State

25 is going to be arguing all of the evidence points, we believe


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1090

1 that the evidence points that the defendant did it.

2 THE COURT: Right. So that doesn't really make

3 sense. By default, your whole argument is he didn't do it so

4 you don't need to say, so by the way, someone else must have.

5 It's the same thing as them saying, we're up

6 here arguing the whole time he didn't do it, but we don't

7 need to highlight that by saying who else could have done it.

8 It cuts both ways. Either you both do it or

9 you can't. I mean, I thought the agreement was you couldn't.

10 Of course, that's your argument. That would make sense

11 that's your argument. You would never be arguing that he did

12 it.

13 MR. SWANSON: I understand that. Since we're

14 arguing an alibi defense, as a necessity it includes the idea

15 that it's somebody else. I don't want to prejudge Mr.

16 Schwartz's closing, but I think he does have that as part of

17 his argument.

18 We don't know who did it but we just know it

19 wasn't Russell Faria.

20 MS. ASKEY: I think a simple statement that

21 says we don't know who did it is fine, as long as they

22 don't go any further than that and not keep going over and

23 over.

24 MR. HICKS: Right. In response to that, I

25 think it's fair for us to argue, look at the evidence that


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1091

1 does point to him. We believe he's the one who did this

2 based upon the evidence and that's --

3 THE COURT: I mean, that's fair game anyway.

4 What they are just saying is you wouldn't make statements

5 that said, by the way, who else could have done it? That's

6 all I'm saying.

7 MR. RICKS: She's not going to ask that

8 rhetorical question.

9 THE COURT: Okay. Anything else before we

10 bring in the jury?

11 MR. SWANSON: No.

12 MS. ASKEY: No, Your Honor.

13 (End of bench discussion.)

14 THE COURT: Okay. We're ready for the jury to

15 be brought in.

16 (The jury entered the Courtroom.)

17 THE COURT: Thank you. You may be seated.

18 For the record, the Court will read through the

19 number of each juror. If you would please indicate your

20 presence by raising your hand.

21 Juror Number 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 15, 27, 29, 35,

22 38, 39, 44, 51, 58 and 61. For the record, all jurors are

23 present.

24 If Counsel could approach?

25 (Off the record discussion.)


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1092

1 THE COURT: The Court will now read to the jury

2 Instruction No. 3. The law applicable to this case is stated

3 in these instructions and the two which the Court will read

4 to you immediately -- I'm sorry, the two which the Court read

5 to you immediately after you were sworn as jurors.

6 All of the instructions will be given to you to

7 take to your jury room for use during your deliberations.

8 You must not single out certain instructions and disregard

9 others or question the wisdom of any rule of law.

10 The Court does not mean to assume as true any

11 fact referred to in these instructions but leaves it to you

12 to determine what the facts are.

13 Instruction No. 4. The charge of any offense

14 is not evidence and it creates no inference that any offense

15 was committed or that the defendant is guilty of an offense.

16 The defendant is presumed to be innocent, unless and until

17 during your deliberations upon your verdict, you find him

18 guilty.

19 This presumption of innocence places upon the

20 State the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that

21 the defendant is guilty.

22 A reasonable doubt is a doubt based upon reason

23 and common sense after careful and impartial consideration of

24 all of the evidence in the case.

25 Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is proof that


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1093

1 leaves you firmly convinced of the defendant's guilt. The

2 law does not require proof that overcomes every possible

3 doubt.

4 If, after your consideration of all of the

5 evidence, you are firmly convinced that the defendant is

6 guilty of the crime charged, you will find him guilty. If

7 you are not so convinced, you must give him the benefit of

8 the doubt and find him not guilty.

9 State will now proceed with closing argument.

10 MR. SCHWARTZ: Judge, if we may approach?

11 THE COURT: Yes.

12 (Off the record discussion.)

13 THE COURT: At this time, the Court is going to

14 go ahead and read the rest of the instructions. They do have

15 to all be read to you and then we will have forms that will

16 go back with you when you deliberate and you will also be

17 given the instructions that the Court is reading so that you

18 can refer to those instructions.

19 Instruction No. 5. As to Count I, if you find

20 and believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt,

21 first, that between the hours of 7:20 p.m. and 9:40 p.m. on

22 December 27th, 2011, at 130 Sumac Drive, Troy, in the County

23 of Lincoln, State of Missouri, Russell Faria caused the death

24 of Elizabeth Faria by stabbing her and,

25 Second, that Russell Faria knew or was aware


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1094

1 that his conduct was causing or was practically certain to

2 cause the death of Elizabeth Faria and,

3 Third, that Russell Faria did so after

4 deliberation, which means cool reflection upon the matter for

5 any length of time, no matter how brief, then you will find

6 Russell Faria guilty under Count I of Murder in the First

7 Degree.

8 However, unless you find and believe from the

9 evidence beyond a reasonable doubt each and all of these

10 propositions, you must find Russell Faria not guilty of

11 Murder in the First Degree.

12 If you do find Russell Faria guilty under Count

13 I of Murder in the First Degree, you are to assess and

14 declare the punishment at imprisonment for life without

15 eligibility for probation or parole.

16 Instruction No. 6. If you have a reasonable

17 doubt as to whether, first, that between 7:20 p.m. and 9:40

18 p.m., at 130 Sumac Drive, Troy, in the County of Lincoln,

19 State of Missouri, on December 27th, 2011, Russell Faria

20 caused the death of Elizabeth Faria by stabbing her or,

21 Second, that Russell Faria did so after

22 deliberation, you must find Russell Faria not guilty under

23 Count I of Murder in the First Degree as submitted in

24 Instruction No. 5.

25 Instruction No. 7. As to Count I, if you do


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1095

1 not find Russell Faria guilty of Murder in the First Degree,

2 you must consider whether he is guilty of Murder in the

3 Second Degree under this instruction.

4 As to Count I, if you find and believe from the

5 evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, first, that between the

6 hours of 7:20 p.m. and 9:40 p.m. on December 27, 2011, at 130

7 Sumac Drive, Troy, in the County of Lincoln, State of

8 Missouri, Russell Faria caused the death of Elizabeth Faria

9 by stabbing her and,

10 Second, that Russell Faria knew or was aware

11 that his conduct was causing or was practically certain to

12 cause the death of Elizabeth Faria, then you will find

13 Russell Faria guilty under Count I of Murder in the Second

14 Degree.

15 However, unless you find and believe from the

16 evidence beyond a reasonable doubt each and all of these

17 propositions, you must find Russell Faria not guilty of

18 Murder in the Second Degree.

19 Instruction No. 8. If you have a reasonable

20 doubt as to whether between 7:20 p.m. and 9:40 p.m. at 130

21 Sumac Drive, Troy, in the County of Lincoln, State of

22 Missouri, on December 27, 2011, Russell Faria caused the

23 death of Elizabeth Faria by stabbing her, you must find

24 Russell Faria not guilty under Count I of Murder in the

25 Second Degree as instructed in Instruction No. 7.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1096

1 If Counsel could approach briefly.

2 (Off the record discussion.)

3 THE COURT: Instruction No. 9. As to Count II,

4 if you find and believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable

5 doubt, first, that Russell Faria is guilty of the offense of

6 Murder in the First Degree as submitted in Instruction No. 5

7 and,

8 Second, that Russell Faria committed that

9 offense by or with or through the knowing use or assistance

10 or aid of a deadly weapon, then you will find the defendant

11 guilty under Count II of Armed Criminal Action.

12 However, unless you find and believe from the

13 evidence beyond a reasonable doubt each and all of these

14 propositions, you must find Russell Faria not guilty of that

15 offense.

16 Instruction No. 10. As to Count II, if you do

17 not find Russell Faria guilty of Armed Criminal Action in

18 connection with the offense of Murder in the First Degree,

19 you must consider whether he is guilty of Armed Criminal

20 Action in connection with the offense of Murder in the Second

21 Degree.

22 As to Count II, if you find and believe from

23 the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, first, that Russell

24 Faria is guilty of the offense of Murder in the Second Degree

25 as submitted in Instruction No. 7 and,


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1097

1 Second, that Russell Faria committed that

2 offense by or with or through the knowing use or assistance

3 or aid of a deadly weapon, then you will find Russell Faria

4 guilty under Count II of Armed Criminal Action.

5 However, unless you find and believe from the

6 evidence beyond a reasonable doubt each and all of these

7 propositions, you must find Russell Faria not guilty of that

8 offense.

9 Instruction No. 11. One of the issues in this

10 case is whether Russell Faria was present at 130 Sumac Drive,

11 Troy, in the County of Lincoln, State of Missouri on December

12 27, 2011, between 7:20 p.m. and 9:40 p.m.

13 On that issue, you are instructed as follows.

14 The State has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt

15 that Russell Faria was present at the time and place of the

16 offense -- I'm sorry.

17 The State has the burden of proving beyond a

18 reasonable doubt that Russell Faria was present at the time

19 and place the offense is alleged to have been committed. If

20 the evidence in this case leaves in your mind a reasonable

21 doubt that Russell Faria was present at 130 Sumac Drive,

22 Troy, Missouri, in Lincoln County on December 27, 2011, when

23 the crime was committed, then you must find Russell Faria not

24 guilty.

25 Instruction No. 12. Under the law, a defendant


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1098

1 has the right not to testify. No presumption of guilt may be

2 raised and no inference of any kind may be drawn from the

3 fact that Russell Faria did not testify.

4 Instruction No. 13. The defendant is charged

5 with a separate offense in each of the two Counts submitted

6 to you. Each Count must be considered separately. You

7 should return a separate verdict for each Count and you can

8 return only one verdict for each Count.

9 Instruction No. 14. When you retire to your

10 jury room, you will first select one of your number to act as

11 your foreperson and to preside over your deliberations.

12 You will then discuss the case with your fellow

13 jurors. Each of you must decide the case for yourself, but

14 you should do so only after you have considered all the

15 evidence, discussed it fully with the other jurors and

16 listened to the views of your fellow jurors.

17 Your verdict, whether guilty or not guilty,

18 must be agreed to by each juror. Although the verdict must

19 be unanimous, the verdict should be signed by your foreperson

20 alone.

21 When you have concluded your deliberations, you

22 will complete the applicable forms to which you unanimously

23 agree and return them with all unused forms and the written

24 instructions of the Court.

25 Instruction No. 15. The attorneys will now


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1099

1 have the opportunity of arguing the case to you. Their

2 arguments are intended to help you in understanding the

3 evidence and applying the law, but they are not evidence.

4 You will bear in mind that it is your duty to

5 be governed in your deliberations by the evidence as you

6 remember it, the reasonable inferences which you believe

7 should be drawn therefrom and the law as given in these

8 instructions.

9 It is your duty, and yours alone, to render

10 such verdict under the law and the evidence in your reason

11 and conscience is true and just.

12 The State's attorney must open the argument.

13 The defendant's attorney may then argue the case. The

14 State's attorney may then reply. No further argument is

15 permitted by either side.

16 Is the State ready for closing?

17 MS. ASKEY: Yes, Your Honor.

18 THE COURT: State will then proceed with their

19 closing.

20 MR. SCHWARTZ: Your Honor, I want to object to

21 this being in evidence. That's not in evidence.

22 MS. ASKEY: What's not in evidence?

23 MR. SCHWARTZ: That.

24 MS. ASKEY: The charge language?

25 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1100

1 THE COURT: Does the State have an objection?

2 MS. ASKEY: To take down State of Missouri

3 versus Russell Faria?

4 MR. SCHWARTZ: That's up to the jury what that

5 is.

6 MS. ASKEY: That's what he's been charged with.

7 Okay.

8 Good morning.

9 JURORS: Good morning.

10 MS. ASKEY: First, I want to thank you for your

11 attentive listening over the last five days, essentially last

12 Friday through today, and for the last five days we've heard

13 all about Elizabeth, Betsy Faria's death.

14 But for a minute, I want to talk to you a

15 little bit about her life. Who was she? She was a Mom. You

16 heard from her two daughters. She was a sister. You heard

17 from two of her sisters. She was a daughter. You saw Janet

18 Meyer take the stand and you heard from her.

19 She was a go-getter. She was described as the

20 happy person, the positive person, somebody that was

21 determined; and she was diagnosed with terminal cancer.

22 Who else was Betsy Faria? Well, I would

23 contend that she was a victim of domestic violence. You

24 heard from her daughters that it wasn't the Brady Bunch in

25 that house. There was a lot of profanity, argument,


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1101

1 condescending. A lot of dominance, controlling, disrespect.

2 That was just the glimmer of what we got to see into Betsy

3 Faria's life.

4 Now people that are victims of domestic

5 violence aren't typically violated in front of others, but we

6 got to see, through her daughters, what kind of life she

7 lived.

8 We got to hear from her sister, Mary, how even

9 some five years ago, she had to respond to Betsy Faria's

10 house because the defendant was in a rage.

11 The defendant was calling names -- I think the

12 "C-word", which I still haven't been able to bring myself to

13 use in front of you.

14 To these young girls, he's throwing a fit.

15 Throwing a tantrum on the bed. He shoves her and, as she's

16 calling the police and getting out of there with her child,

17 he says, I'm going to cut you up in bits and pieces and bury

18 you. Folks, that's domestic violence at its heart.

19 Now the defense wants to say, well, that was

20 four years ago, five years ago. Well, I'm hopeful that

21 nobody ever hears that from anyone, especially their spouse.

22 I think that thought process kind of started Russ Faria and

23 his plan.

24 And something that's important that you know

25 about every crime scene that our law enforcement officers


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1102

1 investigate in a Major Case Squad comes in and looks at in

2 every crime scene, the victim leaves their voice behind in

3 some way, and it's up to us to hear it.

4 In this crime scene, Betsy Faria left her

5 voice. She left it on the light switch in her bedroom. She

6 left it on her husband's, the defendant's slippers in her

7 closet.

8 She left it on the kitchen floor and on the

9 front of the towel drawer in the kitchen. She even left her

10 voice through her dog, Sicily.

11 In every crime scene, the defendant leaves

12 their voice behind and what happens is the voice becomes more

13 prominent when the killer gets careless, and I would contend

14 that that's what happened here. At some point, the killer

15 got careless.

16 Well, how did it happen? That's always the

17 million-dollar question, right? How did it happen?

18 I think Richard told you in jury selection, we

19 may not be able to answer every question for you, and that's

20 unfortunately the case more oftentimes than not. But I'm

21 going to tell you how I think it happened.

22 I think -- how did he do it? He decided that

23 this would be the ultimate role play. The ultimate game.

24 The ultimate way to stage, but it required all hands on deck.

25 It required a pretty good script, one that


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1103

1 could be committed to memory and one that could be

2 anticipated. Anticipation of every move.

3 Now I'm not suggesting that he knew all along

4 that December 27th was going to be the day, but I am

5 suggesting that months before, maybe years before, he had the

6 idea and I think he brought it to his friends.

7 I think he talked about it. How would we do

8 this? How would the ultimate role play happen?

9 It just so happens that his marriage was not

10 well, and the worse it got, all of a sudden Betsy finds out

11 she's not in remission. She has terminal cancer.

12 What's her goal as a Mom, do you think? I'm

13 going to just wait it out? Live in this life. Die with this

14 man? Or am I going to take care of my kids? What's her goal

15 as a Mom, do you think?

16 He knew she had $300,000 in life insurance, at

17 least, is what Major Floyd said. I think he started this

18 conversation. And once he realized his wife calls on

19 December 27th and says, well, she texts, actually, and says,

20 I think I'm going to come back. I'm going to come home

21 tonight. And he says, here? Home here? Yeah, home to Troy.

22 He didn't expect her.

23 Now he knows that she doesn't feel well because

24 she tells him that. He knows she's been at chemotherapy. He

25 knows that her white blood count is low.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1104

1 Wouldn't you think that this doting husband who

2 is so distraught would say, you know what, honey? I already

3 know that my game has been canceled tonight. No problem.

4 I'll pick you up. I'll take you home so you can rest. I'll

5 be there by 5:00. Wouldn't you think that the doting husband

6 would do that?

7 No, he knew she was tired and he knew if he

8 told her he had a game, which he later orchestrated the

9 get-together, that she's not going to wait around until 9

10 o'clock.

11 She's tired. She's had two days, three days of

12 Christmas and, let's face it, folks, she's got cancer. So

13 she says, you know what? I'm going to head on home. A

14 friend is going to take me. Exactly what he wanted to

15 happen.

16 And so the ball starts rolling. The momentum

17 starts gaining. He makes all of these stops so that he can

18 establish an alibi. Not a bad idea.

19 He goes to the Conoco Station in Troy and, I

20 thought it was interesting and you guys probably noticed, he

21 pumped fuel for less than three minutes in an Explorer SUV.

22 How much gas do you think he got? Do you think

23 he didn't have enough to get down to U-Gas where those

24 cigarettes were so much cheaper? Fifty-nine cents I think he

25 saved. Did that seem strange?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1105

1 He laid it out. Cancelled dinner with his Mom

2 because he had lots of errands to run. You heard of the

3 errands that he ran. He got down there and he said,

4 tonight's the night.

5 I don't know if any of you picked up on it when

6 Brandon Sweeney was on the stand, but when defense counsel

7 said, when was the last time you saw Russ Faria? He said,

8 not since "the night". Not "that night". That night we

9 played. That night we watched Conan the Barbarian. That

10 night we celebrated Christmas.

11 "The night". The night we've been talking

12 about for months, for years. The night. It's here. It's

13 real. Tonight is the night.

14 He leaves his phone and he heads back to Troy.

15 He comes into the house. Betsy is on the couch, love seat.

16 She's covered in a blanket, and I submit to you that he has

17 sex with her. That he violates her one more time. That he

18 controls her just one more time.

19 I'm going to humiliate you in a way that only I

20 can. One more time. Knowing that she's tired. That she's

21 sick. That she's not well. She lay there probably disgusted

22 with many things at that point.

23 And why doesn't he have blood on his clothes?

24 Because I don't think he was wearing clothes. I think he

25 walks past her in the kitchen. I think he goes around the


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1106

1 refrigerator to the butcher block where he knows it is.

2 I think he gets the steak knife out in his own

3 kitchen. I think he gets this knife out and he comes around

4 to where she's lying on the sofa, on this sofa.

5 I think he comes around the corner and I think

6 he's really hopeful that he's going to stab her one time in

7 the neck and it's going to look like a suicide.

8 And folks, I'm not going to pretend that I

9 think the stabbing in the neck is a suicide or even looks

10 like one, and I'm sure you don't either but guess what? The

11 defendant sure does and why do we know that?

12 Because when he called 9-1-1, he said, "I just

13 walked in. My wife has killed herself and she has a knife

14 sticking out of her neck." He believed that's plausible.

15 I think he stood over top of her. He stabbed

16 her in the neck. When she moved, he stabbed her with such

17 force in her bicep as she lay on her side that it went

18 through her bicep and into her lung.

19 I think she, at some point, obviously gets up.

20 She sits up and she struggles somewhat, but not much.

21 Luckily for her, I would imagine that she died within a

22 minute. But it was personal. It was passionate.

23 He gets her on the ground and, at that point, I

24 think that the overall feeling is, oh, no, this went horribly

25 wrong. Reality sets in. Now what do I do?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1107

1 The killer gets careless. He starts, I'm going

2 to cut her arms. Except for we know that happened after she

3 died.

4 What do I do? He goes back, takes a shower,

5 gets any evidence off of him that he has and then he comes

6 out. And the killer is careless because guess what? They

7 have got a family dog and he forgets that a dog, by nature,

8 is going to be inquisitive.

9 When there's blood, they are going to be

10 inquisitive and, let's face it, it's the dog's owner and so

11 the dog is kind of investigating things, and he's like, oh,

12 no.

13 He picks the dog up. He throws it over to the

14 kitchen and then gets it outside on the chain. He's

15 careless.

16 At some point, either he goes down to

17 Wentzville, Lake St. Louis and picks up his phone, gets his

18 Arby's bag and heads back to Troy to call in the suicide or I

19 would submit to you that Brandon Sweeney is the one that goes

20 to Arby's, gets the receipt, then drives across the street to

21 Jack in the Box, just about five minutes later is the time on

22 those receipts.

23 Gets his receipt because he wants to cover his

24 own behind and then he drives to Troy, brings the defendant

25 his phone, and just as he's bringing the phone so that he can
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1108

1 put the receipt in the other car, defendant's calling, on the

2 land line, 9-1-1.

3 As he's on the phone and, ladies and gentlemen,

4 you will be able to listen to that 9-1-1 call if you want to.

5 I ask you to listen to things like the differences in the

6 pitch, the differences in the echo of his voice.

7 You can tell that he's moving when he's on that

8 call, and I would submit to you that while he's talking to

9 9-1-1, he realizes, the slippers. The killer gets careless.

10 He's thought of everything else. It's

11 perfectly staged but the slippers. Betsy Faria's voice is

12 left at the crime scene.

13 He runs back into his bedroom and the light's

14 on. 9-1-1 is already on the phone. He knows they are

15 dispatching. He turns the light off because he doesn't tell

16 them he was ever in the bedroom and he quickly tosses the

17 shoes in the closet.

18 What do we know? Well, we know that Betsy was

19 alive at 7:05 and she was dead at 9:40. We know that her

20 body is staged to make it look differently than it happened.

21 We know that many of those wounds were post

22 mortem. We know that her Mom calls the defendant at 8:57 and

23 leaves a voicemail which is picked up within 30 seconds. We

24 know that.

25 We know by the pictures that the defendant's


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1109

1 coat was lying nicely over the chair, just this far from his

2 dead wife. We know that.

3 We know that his gloves are all the way across

4 the room and, if you remember those videos where he's pumping

5 gas at the Conoco, he's got his gloves on but his gloves are

6 all the way on the other side of the room beyond her body.

7 We know that it's an inside job. Nobody broke

8 in. No signs of forced entry. It was somebody that knew

9 where the butcher block was. Knew where the knives were

10 kept. Knew where the dish towels were located.

11 And we know that the defendant's phone was

12 inactive, other than data receipts, for three hours. Those

13 are the things we know.

14 We also know that the defendant claims he lied

15 down next to her. He came inside and he lay down on the

16 floor next to her, but there was not any trace of evidence on

17 him. None.

18 We know through Mr. Fahnestock that every piece

19 of evidence that was sent to the lab to be tested, there was

20 not one, not one single DNA profile, other than the

21 defendant's and the victim's, that was obtained from those

22 samples. Not one.

23 We know that the bloody slippers were in the

24 bedroom, and I would ask you guys to take a look. These are

25 the photographs. You remember the photographs. You notice


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1110

1 the color of the blood.

2 This is what old blood looks like. It's dark.

3 It's black. This is what fresh blood looks like. We have

4 the bloody slippers.

5 We also have, ladies and gentlemen, the

6 dog-like paw print pattern on the pants. Now I will tell

7 you, because I don't have a ruler for one and because this

8 seemed like an easy way to do it, I took this piece of paper

9 and I held it between the three --

10 MR. SCHWARTZ: Objection, Your Honor. Assuming

11 facts not in evidence at this point as to what she did.

12 THE COURT: Sustained.

13 MS. ASKEY: I can ask them to do it. If you

14 were to take, ladies and gentlemen, a piece of paper and hold

15 it between the three pads of the dog's paw, you would come up

16 with markings similar to these. That's the print from Betsy

17 Faria's hip.

18 Now if you were to take those and compare them

19 to all of the paw prints that were derived from the family

20 dog, every one of them will match that print on her hip.

21 That's what we know.

22 We know that the light switch in the bedroom

23 had male and female DNA and the major contributor was Betsy

24 Faria in the blood.

25 We know that a Blue Star application was made


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1111

1 to the kitchen. Now I can't tell you -- it's a presumptive

2 test. We've talked about that. Tests for serological

3 fluids; blood, saliva, semen, those sorts of things. But

4 also, in fairness, it gives a false positive. Cleaning

5 agents will give a false positive.

6 We heard that. And I'm okay with all of that

7 because I don't know anybody that just cleans one drawer

8 facing and I don't know anybody that just cleans one path on

9 the kitchen floor that goes from the dead body to the back

10 door and to the one drawer that, incidentally, is not next to

11 the sink, but the one drawer that holds the kitchen towels.

12 So it could be a cleaning agent. It could be

13 serological fluid. But we know that's where the Blue Star

14 reacted.

15 We know that Betsy Faria had semen inside of

16 her and the defendant said the last time he had intercourse

17 with his wife was on the evening of the 25th. Ladies, three

18 days --

19 MR. SCHWARTZ: Objection, Your Honor. It's two

20 days, less than two days. It's on the 27th.

21 MS. ASKEY: The autopsy was performed on the

22 28th and at that point is when the swabs were done. At that

23 point is when she still has drainage from the sexual

24 intercourse that she had allegedly had on the 25th. Common

25 sense. Reason.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1112

1 What did he tell us? He said, my wife killed

2 herself. He said he laid next to her. He said, the dog is

3 outside on the chain. That's what he said to the 9-1-1

4 operator. The dog is outside on the chain. How did he know

5 that? He just walked in the door. How did he know where the

6 dog was unless he put it there?

7 What I think is really telling, ladies and

8 gentlemen, is the hysteria. We heard from the 9-1-1

9 operator, he's hysterical and then he can answer a question.

10 He's hysterical and then he can answer a question. She

11 judged him a little bit.

12 We heard from Officer Hollingsworth, who said,

13 hey, this guy, I think he's going into shock. And then

14 minutes later, he's in my car smoking cigarettes. We're

15 laughing.

16 He's talking about how he used to take girls

17 down to Bobblehead Road and scare the hell out of them.

18 Laughing it up not even an hour after his wife is dead. He

19 judged him.

20 Detective Merkel, Detective Floyd, Detective

21 Harney, they judged him. He's crying. He's on his knees.

22 He's wailing, though he never needs a Kleenex. Not one time

23 in all of those hours.

24 And, ladies and gentlemen, I'll be frank. I

25 judged him, too. And you, 15 people have sat in this


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1113

1 Courtroom now for the last four days. You saw when I put

2 pictures up of Elizabeth Faria that were hard for you to look

3 at and frankly hard for me, and I didn't know her.

4 You heard the gasp of her family members and

5 the tears and you heard her mother say she couldn't even look

6 at it.

7 Did you pay attention to the defendant?

8 Because arguably, it's the first time he's ever seen his wife

9 in that condition, also.

10 Ladies and gentlemen, a reasonable doubt is a

11 doubt based upon reason, common sense and after careful and

12 impartial consideration of all of the evidence in the case,

13 I ask you to use reasonable inferences.

14 If you go to bed at night and you wake up and

15 there's snow on the ground, you can infer that it snowed. In

16 this case, you need to make reasonable inferences.

17 I believe that the State has proved its case

18 beyond a reasonable doubt. I believe that, based on the

19 evidence, based on all of the things that I've described here

20 and that we've heard over the last several days, that you

21 should be firmly convinced and you should return a verdict of

22 guilty on all Counts. Thank you.

23 THE COURT: Mr. Schwartz?

24 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes.

25 THE COURT: You may proceed.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1114

1 MR. SCHWARTZ: It sounds to me that she just

2 accused four people of being complicit in murder: Michael

3 Corbin, Brandon Sweeney, Marshall Bach and Angelia Julian.

4 They just got accused of murder by the Prosecutor of Lincoln

5 County without one shred of evidence.

6 What if someone came over to your house and

7 watched a movie and went home and did something and you got

8 accused of murder? That's offensive.

9 MS. ASKEY: Judge I'm going to object as

10 personalization of the jury.

11 MR. SCHWARTZ: Those people were accused of

12 murder five minutes ago. Tonight's the night.

13 Let's talk about the word "proof". She talked

14 about reasonable doubt. I talked to all of you about that in

15 voir dire. Proof. Let's not go to reasonable doubt. Let's

16 talk about proof.

17 All she said was, "I think". I think he came

18 home, got undressed and had sex because there was eight sperm

19 cells left inside of his wife. Dr. Fahnestock said if it's

20 recent, there's thousands and it can last for a long time.

21 Yeah, and a smudge on the rectal area, that can last for a

22 long time, even if you shower.

23 And there's no evidence. Nobody said she

24 showered. She's still in the same clothing from the day

25 before. She's wrapped in that blanket, curled up on that


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1115

1 couch. When did she have sex? He's naked and she's wrapped

2 up cozily in her blanket? Proof.

3 Is there anybody who doubts when he left his

4 house that night? We know he's at the Conoco at 5:16 and

5 that's about ten minutes or so from his house up on Sumac.

6 You saw him on the video setting up his alibi.

7 Did he go in the Conoco? No, he pumped enough gas to get

8 where he was going and back. Did he do anything? No. He

9 pumped gas. That's it.

10 And look at that video. I'm pretty darn

11 certain he's not wearing any gloves. If you look at that

12 video, when you see Russell on the screen, you also see some

13 guy walking through the door and he does this with his arms.

14 Making a big spectacle of himself.

15 That's not Russell. He doesn't go inside. He

16 pumps the gas. You can see it all on the surveillance video.

17 Cameras are everywhere when you go to your grocery store,

18 when you go to Walmart, you go to your bank, when you drive

19 through a red light. Those are cameras. Are you setting up

20 alibis?

21 Does anyone doubt he was at Conoco? That's

22 proof. We saw it. You saw it with your own eyes.

23 You saw the time and it corresponds with his

24 cell phone. If you look at this, the blue shows going down.

25 The red shows going up.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1116

1 At 5:07, 5:08 and 5:10, he's still within this

2 northern quadrant. Then it gets below and at these times,

3 his phone travels south. Is that proof? Do we know he was

4 traveling south? Yeah. The cell towers will show you where

5 his phone was. His phone wasn't magically doing it.

6 Did he go to Michael Corbin's house that night?

7 You see the text talking about we're going to do this and

8 every single person said that's what Russell does from 6:00

9 to 9:00 every single Tuesday night.

10 That's why there's no activity. Nobody calls

11 him. They play games. Nobody calls any of those people from

12 6 o'clock to 9 o'clock because that's where they are and

13 that's what they do.

14 You saw the text before. Four people, one who

15 only knew him about six or eight months, Marshall Bach. He

16 testified he was there. Angelia Julian, Michael Corbin,

17 Brandon Sweeney; are those four people complicit in murder?

18 That's proof. He was there.

19 We also know he was there because his cell

20 phone goes south of that tower at 5:50. Now he doesn't make

21 anymore calls, but there is activity on his cell phone, and

22 we will agree, his cell phone remains at that site because at

23 7:50 there's activity on the phone. He got an e-mail or some

24 sort of ping.

25 Did he go to Arby's that night? Well, before


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1117

1 we get to that, did he go to U-Gas? Yeah. Well, what does

2 the State prove to you? That he spent 67 cents less because

3 that's where he gets his cigarettes. He didn't go into the

4 Conoco. We know he went there because he's on video there.

5 That's proof. That's proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

6 Did he go to Greene's Country Store? He did.

7 The detective showed you the receipt. It's an exhibit. You

8 can ask to see these. He went there.

9 Did he go to QuikTrip? He's on video at

10 QuikTrip. He walks in. He buys tea, and I would submit to

11 you it's two-for-one for teas at QuikTrip. He gets two

12 instead of one, and if you look at the exhibit, the one is

13 almost gone. Leaves it in his car and he drinks it on the

14 way and he almost finishes it on the way home.

15 Now remember, we looked at texts. You look at

16 his day of text. Why does he go to Greene's Country Store?

17 He's awfully lucky because Betsy says at 10:30, you're

18 supposed to get dog food tonight.

19 We know he got dog food. We know he texted it.

20 We saw the picture of the dog food leaning against the garage

21 door. I showed that to you. Not the State.

22 She says, you got game tonight? He says, yeah.

23 I will get it when I come in. Yeah, I got game tonight and

24 I'll get the dog food when I come in. That's his text. Then

25 he texts the other guys. I know no game tonight. Still cool


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1118

1 to come over, maybe play Talisman?

2 He's not setting up something. This is what

3 they do every Tuesday. They say, yeah. He says, sweet. See

4 you then.

5 Then there's another text from Brandon inviting

6 everybody out to some New Year's party and he says he's got a

7 gig, their DJ business.

8 Then there's another text from Brandon. Then

9 he texts Betsy back. Yeah, I'm going to game. Then I'll

10 come get you. Should not be too late.

11 So what is this plan? He's going to go pick up

12 his wife and bring her home so she can spend the night at

13 home on a Tuesday night. She responds, okay. Great honey.

14 Is this a victim of domestic violence?

15 What have you heard as far as domestic

16 violence? That teenage stepdaughters who had moved out and

17 were having problems who said he cussed. From a sister, who

18 I think in 2004, interfered in a domestic argument that they

19 were having and he made a threat five, six, seven years

20 earlier. That's what they are using as proof. That's not

21 proof.

22 After she says, okay. Great honey. Then he

23 talks about "Mo", which I assume is Mariah. Remember she was

24 in the hospital? She's better, but work is giving her

25 trouble. Okay. She has a note. They are going to find a


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1119

1 replacement. Hey, all is good. All is good.

2 Then she says, I got TP, which I'm assuming

3 means "toilet paper" and if you look at the photographs, you

4 are going to see a bag with toilet paper sitting there on the

5 chair, and Pam Hupp wants to take me home.

6 Talks about her "WBC", which I assume is her

7 white blood cell count being low. So there's no question

8 mark.

9 Are you coming home here? Yes. Troy. She is

10 bringing you? Yes. She offered. I accepted. Didn't get

11 much sleep. Mom snored. Okay. See you soon then. Okay.

12 Great.

13 Then the next and last is a text right about 6

14 o'clock as Brandon says he's walking in that was never

15 responded to.

16 So what do we know? We know Russ leaves his

17 home at 5:00. He makes calls to his wife and his mother.

18 Those are reflected also in the cell phones. Tells his mom,

19 I'm not coming over as I usually do because I'm running these

20 errands and then he goes and he hangs out all night.

21 "Tonight's the night", like she said. Boy,

22 that was a pretty detailed plan. Hey, if the police talk to

23 you, don't remember what I wore because that would sound too

24 obvious. Tell them we watched movies. Tell them we watched

25 "Conan" and we watched "The Road"? Nobody would say that.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1120

1 Remember where we sat. That's crazy.

2 We know what kind of car he was in. There's no

3 doubt about that. He was in his blue Explorer. Mr. Sweeney

4 got the color of the car wrong once before. He said it was

5 like a mauvey-green or a brown or something. They are not

6 lying.

7 What didn't the State show? Remember, they

8 have the burden of proof. Sabharwal said there's 56 stab

9 wounds. Remember, there was about -- the wounds in the back,

10 the wounds in the torso, the wounds in the neck; 14, 15

11 centimeters. That's 7 inch wounds. And it's not like

12 shooting somebody. You were right together.

13 He said, yeah. I would absolutely expect

14 whoever did this to have blood on them. That night Russ went

15 down to the Police Station, there was no blood on his hands,

16 on his feet, on his hair, on his skin, under his fingernails.

17 And you know how we know that? Because if there was, you

18 would have heard about it. And there wasn't.

19 And it's not because he cleaned up and cleaned

20 his fingernails and washed his hair, because Detective Merkel

21 told you they looked at those drains. There's no blood

22 anywhere suggesting the clean-up. None.

23 They took his pants. They took his shirt.

24 They took his white socks. They took his watch. You know

25 how we know there's no blood anywhere? Dr. Fahnestock told


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1121

1 you and you would have heard about it. Not one iota. Not a

2 scintilla of blood.

3 And we know how detailed it can get because

4 there was one microscopic, unable-to-see cell of somebody

5 under her fingernails that wasn't Russ and it wasn't Betsy.

6 I don't know where it came from. I'm not telling you it was

7 the person who killed her, but that's how detailed this stuff

8 can be.

9 There was a lot of blood. There wasn't one

10 scintilla of blood on him. She said apparently he got naked

11 but kept his slippers on to kill his wife. That's crazy.

12 And we'll talk about that in a second.

13 We know how detailed they can be because they

14 were able to extract eight sperm cells out of her. He said

15 they were intimate Sunday night. That's how detailed the

16 interview was and that's what you would expect after 48

17 hours.

18 She was deceased on the 27th, whether it was

19 the 42 or the next day when they did the autopsy, those sperm

20 cells were still inside her. If she would have had sex the

21 night before, there would be way, way, way more.

22 Detective Fisher, Detective Pratt, they did a

23 full search of the car. If you remove anything with blood on

24 it, a towel, a mop, anything, there would be some sort of

25 transfers.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1122

1 There was nothing in the car. Not one stitch

2 of blood in that car, on the steering wheel, on the windows,

3 anywhere. What did they prove to you?

4 Well, I'm not sure it was beyond a reasonable

5 doubt, but apparently you can get a good deal on cigarettes

6 at U-Gas. It's 60 cents cheaper. That's all they proved.

7 Mr. Hicks and Ms. Askey are both very good at

8 their job and they have done it well, but they can't create

9 evidence.

10 The Major Case Squad officers are picked

11 because they are the best in the region. These guys are the

12 best. They are assigned to investigate one thing, 20 to 25

13 of them investigating one thing.

14 Now I don't have the burden, but they

15 questioned Russell for 16 hours. Said, we need you to help

16 us figure out what happened. Sixteen hours of this. He had

17 been up now for two days by the time they finished.

18 What did he tell them? He told them where he

19 went. So what do they do? They went and seized videos to

20 show where he went.

21 Did the State show those to you? No. We did.

22 Because that would disprove their theory. The video from the

23 Conoco, just pumping gas. The video from the U-Gas, just

24 buying cigarettes. The video from QuikTrip, buying tea.

25 They seized receipts. Did the State show those


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1123

1 to you, the one from Greene's Country Store? The one from

2 Arby's where he went through the drive-thru? You can ask and

3 look at these receipts.

4 He went through the drive-thruto establish his

5 alibi. Did the State show those to you? No. I did. We

6 showed you the receipts.

7 They went the next morning and talked to

8 witnesses, again, the Major Case Squad, they talked to those

9 four people that Ms. Askey has accused of being complicit in

10 murder. Then they got detailed, individual videotaped

11 statements from all four of them, all four, as to what went

12 on and what their whereabouts were. We presented them to

13 you. Not the State.

14 The State kept saying, what do you see right

15 when you walk in? Well, you see Elizabeth Faria on the

16 ground. That's not true. They never showed this photo,

17 Defendant's Exhibit M.

18 When you walk in, there's a hallway right where

19 the dog food is sitting by the garage door where he said he

20 laid it down when it was on his shoulder, and then threw his

21 leather jacket on the chair before seeing her on the floor.

22 We showed you that. They didn't show you that.

23 They seized his phone, got the text messages.

24 We read them to you. They are the ones with the burden.

25 They have had all of this information, 16 hours of tape from


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1124

1 Russell, hours of tapes from Angela, Michael, Brandon and

2 Marshall. Have they disproved anything, anything that any of

3 them said? No. What they did was confirm what they said.

4 There's cameras everywhere. There's traffic

5 cameras everywhere. Don't you think they could have or would

6 have or did look at these things?

7 Ms. Askey's theory is now that he left his

8 phone down there in Troy. Well, there's nothing to prove

9 that. That's conjecture. That's a guess. And as I

10 discussed in opening statements, I'm sorry, in voir dire,

11 that's jumping to a conclusion. That's what that is.

12 Russ jumped to a conclusion when he walked in

13 there and he saw his wife laying on the floor. He jumped to

14 the conclusion of suicide. That was the wrong conclusion.

15 Based upon that, the police apparently jumped

16 to a conclusion and focused on him to the detriment of

17 investigating this thing properly. But not you. You have

18 now heard it all. The State has not proven it. Don't you

19 jump to a conclusion.

20 She said the dispatch tape, he called in and he

21 tried to disguise this. The words are: I just got home from

22 a friend's house. And the operator keeps saying, calm down,

23 calm down, calm down. My wife killed herself. She's on the

24 floor. She's got a knife in her neck and she's slashed her

25 arms. He's not trying to hide anything.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1125

1 Mr. Hicks asked Officer Hollingsworth,

2 Paramedic Quattrocchi, Captain Schramek, what's the first

3 thing they noticed? She's on the floor, a slit in her wrist

4 and a knife in her neck, which is the exact same thing

5 Russell said.

6 But Russell is not a paramedic. He's not an

7 officer. He's not a cop. He's not a fireman or an M.D. He

8 does tech support for Enterprise out of his basement and it

9 was his wife lying there on the floor.

10 They want to judge his grief. They weren't

11 there in Rhode Island when he and Betsy got the news. They

12 weren't on their survival cruise with Russ and Betsy and her

13 mother and those other close friends when they were grieving

14 for the last few months.

15 The only person who walked in that room -- if

16 you walk in that room, all you see is the knife and the

17 wrist. It's obviously not suicide, but why would he say

18 that?

19 Well, you heard. She had attempted at least

20 twice before, leaving a note once and she had been depressed

21 and now she has terminal cancer. That's why he jumped to

22 that conclusion.

23 Was it a wrong conclusion? Absolutely. It was

24 obviously a wrong conclusion, which begs the point. Would

25 the person who did this ever say, I'm going to say it's
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1126

1 suicide and get away with it. Absolutely not a chance.

2 There's 56, 56 stab wounds. Now I say it's

3 obviously not suicide what you see with the knife in the neck

4 and the big slit in the arm, but Officer Hollingsworth, he

5 didn't tell you, well, yeah, I knew there was a bunch more

6 wounds. Quattrocchi, same thing. Schramek, same thing.

7 Nobody who walked in and just saw that knew

8 there was any more wounds. The person who did this is the

9 only person who knew there were more wounds, and that person

10 would never ever, ever say it's suicide nor would they try

11 and sell it as suicide to get away with it. That would be

12 insanity.

13 The State wants to argue he was not hysterical

14 enough. How would you like someone to categorize your grief?

15 Officer Floyd, Officer Hollingsworth, Officer Quattrocchi.

16 Officer Hollingsworth said, you're not a cuddly

17 guy. How is he going to grieve if this would happen to him?

18 Nobody wishes this on anybody but nobody knows how they are

19 going to react.

20 I kept asking Officer Merkel, he had Russ in

21 that interrogation room and every single time he would leave,

22 Russ would be crying. Russ would be praying. Russ would be

23 whispering Betsy's name; Betsy, Betsy, Betsy. No, no, no,

24 no, no.

25 He was alone in the room with a pinhole camera


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1127

1 less than the size of my fingernail. And he would let them

2 go in and then watch him and calm him down.

3 I'm not saying how anyone would react. Nobody

4 knows. This is grief. His wife is now deceased. Did he

5 grieve appropriately? I don't know. He tried to be helpful.

6 He was hysterical. You can ask or listen to the tape. You

7 make a judgment. It's not a fair judgment because none of us

8 would have any idea, but he tries to cooperate.

9 Is he moving around? The 9-1-1 operator tells

10 him to get the medications, put them on the table so they

11 know what she's on.

12 She calms him down. That's her job.

13 Hollingsworth calms him down. Merkel calms him down because

14 we need information to find out what happened. So he's able

15 to calm, but he's still grief-stricken.

16 Let's talk about a few things. The State keeps

17 calling this a paw print. Is it? Maybe. Maybe not. You

18 recall Officer Pratt, female CSI, testifying she said

19 attempts at enhancing the visible paw print pattern on the

20 victim's pants has met with negative results.

21 I asked her about that. You can't say it's

22 blood, can you? No, I can't. You can't say if it's mud, can

23 you? No, I can't. You can't even say if it's a paw print,

24 can you? No, I can't. You can't say when it got there,

25 whatever it is? No, I can't.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1128

1 Well, we know from Pam Hupp that Betsy let the

2 dog outside and we know it was wet outside. The State has

3 said, well, it looks the same as the other blood so it's

4 probably blood. Ms. Pratt said after she looked at it, it

5 was sent to the lab. Do you recall that?

6 Ms. Fischer said it came back from the lab and

7 I looked at it. Dr. Fahnestock said, no, no, no. It was

8 never at the lab and I never tested it. If it was tested at

9 the lab, I would have been the one who tested it.

10 Remember, any attempts to enhance it met with

11 negative results. Negative results. She said, well, because

12 we already knew it was blood because it looked like blood

13 because the stains were the same color, so we're assuming

14 it's blood but the attempts were to enhance the paw print --

15 that's what she testified to after that break we took.

16 The light switch plate, State's Exhibit 17, Dr.

17 Fahnestock told you, and I would agree, it appears to be some

18 sort of cloth pattern on the light switch plate.

19 How would a cloth pattern come in there? Take

20 a look at those shoes. It's a pretty similar cloth pattern,

21 as if somebody was carrying the shoes back there. And if

22 somebody -- if that somebody was Russ, don't you think he

23 would have wiped this off? And don't you think he would have

24 gotten rid of the shoes? He didn't have to call in right

25 when he got home.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1129

1 The stab wounds. Mr. Hicks went over with Dr.

2 Sabharwal in painstaking detail. I think we know all about

3 them. I went over them with Dr. Sabharwal. Remember, Ms.

4 Askey said, someone went into a rage and started stabbing.

5 Oh, my God, what have I done?

6 Remember, this is not rage. There were no

7 irregularities in those stab wounds, meaning there was no

8 movement back and forth and no movement laterally, side to

9 side. Betsy was not moving when those stab wounds were made.

10 Several of those stab wounds in the neck track

11 the exact same direction. The ones in the abdomen track the

12 same direction. The ones in the back, all of these 14, 15

13 centimeters, they all track the same direction. Most likely

14 postmortem, especially if you look at the ones on the back.

15 You can see the blood all on the front of this.

16 On these ones on the back that were 7 inches long, there's no

17 dried blood back there. There's no blood coming out of

18 those. Just like that one on her wrist.

19 Whoever did this wanted to make it look like

20 something like passion or rage. They didn't want to make it

21 look like suicide, and whoever did this certainly wasn't

22 going to say it was suicide.

23 This thing was set up and, remember, whoever

24 did this made those wounds. We know that wound is

25 postmortem. I would suggest those wounds are postmortem.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1130

1 What did they then do? They took that knife

2 and they put it back in her neck. And if you look at that

3 picture, there's a big 'ol fingerprint on that picture.

4 Don't you think if it was planned and Russ had

5 all of this time, he would have cleaned that off? He doesn't

6 know how many points are required to make an identification.

7 Take a look at that picture. The shoes. Where

8 is that picture of the shoes? Is this it?

9 Look at these photographs of the shoes and the

10 blood. Look at them closely.

11 A couple of things. Remember, we asked Ms.

12 Pratt how do you get blood on the bottom of the shoes and

13 there's no impressions of shoes in the blood? What was her

14 answer? Good question. It's a good question because nobody

15 ever stepped in that blood.

16 So how does blood get on the bottom of the

17 shoes? That's not droplets. Look at the side. That's not

18 droplets. Now there's one continuous drop right there.

19 Could that be from rubbing up just into a puddle of blood

20 lightly?

21 Blood is thick. It comes up. It could splash

22 when you dip it in that puddle. Ask the State to tell you

23 how blood gets on the bottom of those shoes without making an

24 impression in the blood and not someone dipping them in the

25 blood and then carrying them back, flipping the light switch
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1131

1 and putting them in that closet to deflect suspicion from

2 whoever that person is, and that person is not Russ.

3 Russ would never have done something like that.

4 The person who did this -- by the way, there are no bloody

5 footprints on the floor. And she can argue all she wants

6 about the tile that Dr. Fahnestock said there is no evidence

7 that blood was on the floor.

8 Yeah, it could have possibly been diluted, but

9 to get it diluted on every single place and drawer and not

10 have any blood anywhere that he could detect?

11 The floors were clean and they weren't clean

12 because of blood evidence. They were clean because people

13 clean their house. Common cleaning solution would give false

14 positive, that's what they talked about.

15 Ask for these and look at these. Those aren't

16 droplets right there. That's a smudge and why isn't it on

17 the entire bottom? Because nobody stepped in blood.

18 Same here. Look at that. That's not a

19 droplet.

20 As far as impressions in the blood, there was

21 no paw print in the blood. If there was, you'd have seen it.

22 And you didn't see it.

23 Russell gave them everything he could to help

24 solve this thing. Instead of solving it, they focused on him

25 because he said "suicide".


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1132

1 Unfortunately for them, all they could do is

2 confirm everything he said right down to being intimate with

3 his wife two nights prior. Everything. The interview with

4 Detective Merkel. He's in that room, praying, kneeling

5 putting his head down and crying.

6 I don't know if there were enough tears. He

7 had a blanket around him. He didn't need Kleenex. But he

8 was alone. He didn't know there was a pinhole camera in that

9 room.

10 Insurance, that's his motive. We found out why

11 he did it, except that insurance had been in his name since

12 2001, purchased by Betsy. He was the Beneficiary, and you

13 saw that little note that was put into evidence.

14 He had Mary Rodgers, his sister. Why would she

15 be on that note? Because she's a Secondary Beneficiary.

16 That's why.

17 And the funeral home said, hey, we need

18 information on the insurance to pay the funeral expenses.

19 Remember something else. This is a sad, sad

20 case. Betsy had terminal cancer. Russell is the Beneficiary

21 of the insurance policy. It's already spread to her liver.

22 All he needs to do is wait if that's his motive. As sad as

23 it is, Betsy was dying. Just wait.

24 They talk about Luminol and the false

25 positives. It reacts with common cleaning products. When


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1133

1 they went and took the tile, there was no barricade on the

2 house. People were staying in the house. There's nothing to

3 indicate that someone hadn't been in the house before.

4 Nothing whatsoever. That was January 3rd or 4th, he said.

5 Again, what did they prove to you? He yelled

6 at his daughters. Maybe he used the wrong terms. They

7 proved that his sister-in-laws think this he could be

8 degrading and they proved that a woman who said he's

9 demeaning and degrading, who's met him three times,

10 apparently doesn't like him.

11 When he called in, they calmed him down.

12 That's what those people do. That's what the 9-1-1 operator

13 does. Officer Merkel said, you know, we had to establish a

14 rapport. He found the rapport with Pastor Mike of the

15 Morning Star Church where they go. That's how he calmed him

16 down and talked to him.

17 Dr. Fahnestock, he looked at all of his

18 clothing. He looked at everything that was sent to him.

19 Every follicle that they sent, every hair follicle, every

20 fingernail, every piece of skin, every article. Not one iota

21 of blood after somebody was stabbed 56 times and it's

22 obviously at close range.

23 You can't scrub that off of you. Officer

24 Merkel said they removed the drain pipes. There was no blood

25 in the drain pipes. There's no blood in the car. There's no


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1134

1 blood on the tile. No blood in his fingernails, his hair,

2 anywhere on his body.

3 The palm print on the door. Well, I talked

4 about that. They have to remove the knowns. What does that

5 palm print on the door do? It proves that he went in and out

6 of the door and let his dog out.

7 When? I don't know. Maybe it was 5 o'clock

8 the night before. Maybe it was 3 o'clock the day before.

9 Maybe it was early morning. Maybe it was a week before.

10 Don't you think there are prints on your doors? That means

11 absolutely nothing.

12 We know how the dog got outside. Pam Hupp

13 testified when she got back there at 7:04 with Betsy, that

14 dog jumps all over you. So Betsy took the dog and put it

15 outside on the lead. That's how it got outside.

16 Let's talk about the texts for a moment.

17 Russell doesn't get that text until 3:46. That's almost 4

18 o'clock saying that he doesn't need to pick up Betsy because

19 Pam is going to bring her home.

20 He would have had to have somehow put this all

21 in motion. There's no phone calls down to Michael Corbin or

22 Brandon Sweeney or Marshall Bach or anybody. There's no

23 evidence that that ever occurred.

24 He would have had to have had this motion, go

25 to those places that they have accused him of setting up an


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1135

1 alibi, show up at their house, leave his phone and say I'll

2 be back guys, don't say anything.

3 They showed you the jewelry chest that was

4 broken. Pam Hupp told you when she went inside, they arrived

5 at 7:04. She was inside for approximately, she didn't know,

6 20 minutes, 30 minutes. She saw the broken leg on the

7 jewelry chest.

8 She said she left and went home about that time

9 and then she called Betsy and Betsy didn't answer and she

10 said, well, I wasn't home. I was almost home. So it doesn't

11 really give us -- or I was home, she considered home free.

12 She said she never went in the house. She told

13 Janet that. She told the detectives that at first. Well, we

14 know she went in the house and we know she was there for some

15 time.

16 The gloves. The gloves -- there's no evidence

17 that those gloves were worn that day, even if he was wearing

18 gloves, which I don't think he was.

19 You look at the sofa in those pictures.

20 There's throw pillows perched on the edge of the sofa.

21 There's an afghan on the top of that sofa. There's a card on

22 the ottoman. There was no violent struggle.

23 Pam Hupp said the last time she saw her she was

24 on the sofa curled up in the blanket just like they found

25 her. She said also that the last time she saw her was at the
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1136

1 door, but if you take what she first said, she's curled up on

2 the sofa in the blanket. There's no coming home, getting

3 naked, having sex, going into some rage.

4 We know at 7:21, 7:26 and 7:30 she missed three

5 calls from Leah.

6 They made a big deal about this family photo.

7 It was Christmas. She was terminal. Is that a man who wants

8 to kill his wife, to take a picture just before he kills her?

9 There was a family portrait at -- I don't

10 remember which side of the family -- later that day. That's

11 just what people do, especially when you know you are going

12 to eventually, ultimately lose a loved one. You want to

13 memorialize things.

14 Again, why would he say suicide? The person

15 who says that obviously -- here's what we have. They cast

16 suspicion upon themselves. The person who did this knows

17 it's not suicide and knows when anybody looks at that body

18 and takes that shirt off and looks at all of the wounds and

19 removes the blood, it's clearly, absolutely, 100 percent not

20 suicide.

21 The stab wounds in the back, the person who did

22 this would not do that in an attempt to cast away suspicion.

23 All that would do is invite suspicion. Not a chance anyone

24 would ever say that.

25 Initially, in that interview, Detective Merkel


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1137

1 said, well, why didn't you touch the body? He said,

2 remember, I laid about a foot away from her. If you look at

3 the picture, away from her head, there is no trace evidence.

4 But he said, if she didn't do this to herself, I didn't want

5 to mess up what the investigation --

6 He was obviously considering, look, if she

7 didn't do this herself, someone needed to look into it and I

8 didn't want to mess up anything.

9 What could he have done? He could have got rid

10 of the shoes, if he knew about the shoes. He wouldn't have

11 carried the shoes back there.

12 Remember, he's the one that called 9-1-1 and

13 reported it. He had all of the time in the world.

14 If he got home and found the shoes, he could

15 have walked out the door, destroyed the shoes just like

16 whoever did this took all, whatever they had and destroyed

17 all of their clothing when they left, whenever they left.

18 He could have cleaned that switch plate off,

19 the light switch plate. He could have stopped somewhere

20 after Arby's, he could have gone into Arby's. I don't know

21 if they have a video camera, but if they do, he would be on

22 it.

23 He could have stopped at the Conoco and got

24 more gas. He could have stopped anywhere and shown what time

25 he was and where he was. He didn't do any of those things


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1138

1 because there was no diabolical plan.

2 If it was a real plan, he probably would have

3 had Marshall or Mike or Angela text something out of his

4 phone while he was gone to prove he was there.

5 Well, nobody did that because it didn't happen,

6 because he was there and his phone was with them and we know

7 where his phone was.

8 The cell sites that we presented to you show

9 where Russell was with his phone. Anything else is a guess.

10 It's not proof and it's certainly not proof that can leave

11 anyone firmly convinced.

12 Let's look for a moment what we would have to

13 do, what Russell would have had to do in order to get this

14 done.

15 He somehow luckily got Betsy to text him that

16 Pam was going to go take her home. Luckily, Pam offered and

17 she accepted, according to the text. Because he was supposed

18 to bring her home, remember?

19 He would have then convinced all of his

20 friends, I'm going to leave my phone here. If anybody asks,

21 say I was here.

22 Rushed home -- now remember, the Arby's is 30

23 minutes and you can watch this tape that we put together if

24 you want. It's a 30-minute drive to the Arby's.

25 Mike Corbin's is further down. It's over an


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1139

1 hour round trip to and fro. It doesn't leave a lot of time.

2 He didn't know what time Betsy is getting home,

3 so he has to get lucky. He doesn't know if Pam Hupp is going

4 to be there or leave or what.

5 So he's got to rush home. He's got to,

6 apparently, let the dog in. He's got to put on his slippers.

7 I would submit to you not any chance that anybody who did

8 this was wearing slippers.

9 He's got to meticulously stab 56 times without

10 leaving any irregularities, without getting any blood on

11 himself. He's got to then show up with no wounds, clean

12 everything up, clean himself up.

13 There's not a scratch on him. There's not a

14 wound on him. There's nothing. He's got to saw through her

15 wrist. He's got to then put the knife back into her neck.

16 Remember, there's no blood on him anywhere. No blood on his

17 hands. No blood under his fingernails. Nothing.

18 Then he's got to hightail it home. He's got to

19 make sure he puts those shoes away, I guess, with the

20 miraculous blood stain on the bottom.

21 He's got to then hightail it back to Mike

22 Corbin's. And what do they come up with? He gets his phone

23 and says, guys, if anybody was here, tell them I was the one

24 sitting in the leather chair. Tell them we watched movies.

25 Tell them we watched "Conan" and "The Road", but we didn't


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1140

1 watch all of "The Road". Let's be consistent on that.

2 No big deal what I'm wearing. You don't need

3 to remember that. Just tell them we talked about my

4 motorcycle. They didn't make that up. That's what happened.

5 They talked about Christmas. They talked about

6 the motorcycle he wanted to get. They watched movies. They

7 had a cup of coffee. They remembered where they sat because

8 they sat that way for three hours and there was not much

9 conversation.

10 Oh, yeah, if you happen to go to Jack in the

11 Box, save that receipt. That's crazy. He saved it because

12 the detective said, where were you? He said it and they

13 probably said it and forgot. It's not in the report

14 anywhere. They didn't seize it.

15 Then he left and he didn't go into Arby's. He

16 didn't do anything else. He didn't go anywhere else and ask

17 for the receipt. He drove through Arby's and then he went

18 home, and you can look at the cell sites and you will see at

19 the time he went home.

20 It takes 30 minutes to get home. That Arby's

21 receipt is 9:09. He got home, immediately called 9-1-1 once

22 he saw her on the ground.

23 Don't be fooled about these slippers. That's

24 the only thing that they can present to you that links him to

25 this. The only thing. But remember, Officer Pratt, or Ms.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1141

1 Pratt, when we said, how does blood get on the bottom when

2 there's no impression? Good question.

3 And if you got a good question like that with

4 the only piece of evidence that potentially links him to

5 this, that is reasonable doubt.

6 Why would they do this? Why would he do it?

7 There's no reason. She was sadly dying. What should he have

8 done? She was gone. She had bled out. Her tongue was

9 hanging out of her mouth. She wasn't breathing.

10 What more could he have done? Think about

11 that. When you go places, when you stop at the grocery

12 store, when you stop at the gas station, you're on videotape.

13 You're not setting up any alibis. When you go to the bank.

14 Everywhere you go these days, you are on video whether you

15 like it or not.

16 His actions show he didn't do anything to make

17 any sort of spectacle. He went in, he got what he got and he

18 went out.

19 The State talked about cadaveric spasms with

20 Dr. Sabharwal. I don't think they have any idea when this

21 happened. The body condition was stiff. It was cool. The

22 blood was setting up. Have they given you enough to say why

23 this happened, when this happened, or how he did it?

24 It sure take takes a lot of planning, a lot of

25 planning and it takes complicity by four other completely


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1142

1 innocent individuals.

2 I don't have to prove to you that he didn't do

3 it. Remember that. I don't have to prove to you he wasn't

4 there, but I think I did. They have to prove he was there.

5 They have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt and they

6 can't.

7 Everything she said was "I think" he had sex

8 with her. I think he was naked. I think those four people

9 are lying for him. I think he went there, left his phone on

10 and drove home.

11 Only because she can't possibly think anything

12 different because I can prove that phone was there. I can

13 prove he was there. I can prove he went to those videos. I

14 can prove he went to those places. So she's got to work

15 within those contexts with the things I can't prove.

16 THE BAILIFF: Time. I gave you your five

17 minute warning. The time is up.

18 MR. SCHWARTZ: Just one second.

19 Shame on them for judging his grief. Shame,

20 shame, shame. Find him not guilty. Find that they did not

21 prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. Thank you.

22 THE COURT: State?

23 MS. ASKEY: Mr. Schwartz wants to talk to you

24 about the defendant being grief-stricken. He looks it.

25 He wants to talk about this alibi, this


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1143

1 foolproof alibi. I sort of like the alibi. I sort of like

2 those guys that got up here; and I'll be honest, they didn't

3 come across probably the way I thought that they were going

4 to.

5 But they had their five facts down. Always.

6 Except for that morning, when that morning -- a little

7 confused. Did we watch one movie or two?

8 MR. SCHWARTZ: Judge, that's a

9 mischaracterization of the evidence.

10 MS. ASKEY: Was it "Conan" or "The Road"?

11 THE COURT: Sustained.

12 MR. SCHWARTZ: Judge, I would ask the jury to

13 recall the evidence as they remember it.

14 THE COURT: Jury is hereby instructed to recall

15 the evidence as you remember it.

16 MS. ASKEY: Did Brandon Sweeney go get a

17 sandwich and come back to his apartment and come inside and

18 eat it with Marshall Bach like Marshall Bach testified? Or

19 did he go get it and eat it and wad up and throw the wrapper

20 and the receipt in the back like Brandon Sweeney testified?

21 Did they really sit there for three hours and

22 all they can remember are the pertinent information about the

23 defendant? They can't remember anything about anyone else.

24 Anything anyone else said.

25 They sat there for three hours and had two


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1144

1 paragraphs of conversation about the defendant's motorcycle

2 he was going to buy, when we heard from Pam Hupp that Betsy

3 had just applied for food stamps.

4 MR. SCHWARTZ: Objection, Your Honor. There's

5 no evidence of that. I would ask that that be stricken from

6 the record.

7 MS. ASKEY: That's what she testified to.

8 MR. SCHWARTZ: I didn't hear it.

9 MS. ASKEY: You weren't listening.

10 THE COURT: That's overruled.

11 You may proceed.

12 MS. ASKEY: That's what they remember. They

13 sit there for three hours, ladies and gentlemen, smoking pot.

14 They don't eat anything or drink anything? I can't talk to

15 you for 30 minutes without having dry mouth and having to get

16 a glass of water and they are smoking pot for three hours and

17 they don't drink anything?

18 Russ Faria stops and gets two liters of tea and

19 he doesn't bring it in. But yet that's one of the errands he

20 had that caused him to cancel dinner with his Mom.

21 They remember that the phone rang. They are

22 all very committed to the fact that his phone rang one time.

23 And they knew it rang because they have heard it ring in the

24 past on other Tuesday nights, because that's when they get

25 together.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1145

1 They are used to his phone ringing. They are

2 used to that sound. They are used to that Imperial March

3 because that's his ringtone.

4 But you heard from Captain Lang who told you

5 his phone didn't ring at all until 8:57. Not during that

6 time where he picked it up and looked at it and put it away.

7 We know that the only time his phone rang,

8 based on those phone records, was at 8:57 and it was his

9 mother-in-law calling to check on her daughter.

10 We know that his voicemail was accessed within

11 30 seconds of that call.

12 MR. SCHWARTZ: Your Honor, again, I would ask

13 the jury be instructed to regard the evidence as they can

14 recall. They couldn't have called with the overlap.

15 THE COURT: State?

16 MS. ASKEY: It's not what Captain Lang

17 testified to. That's what Mr. Swanson said.

18 MR. SWANSON: I agree.

19 THE COURT: Overruled.

20 MS. ASKEY: Are we to assume that this is a

21 ghost killer? That someone just came in and killed her and

22 wanted it to look like a suicide but wait, not just a

23 suicide, maybe I want to set him up, too, and I'm going to do

24 a really bad job of it. Maybe that's what they want to do.

25 But no, not that either.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1146

1 You know what? I think I better clean up after

2 myself if I'm going to come into your house and kill you;

3 and I'm going to be wearing some sort of, I don't know,

4 because I don't leave one shred, not one DNA profile behind.

5 And you heard Mr. Schwartz tell you this was a

6 brutal, personal killing. And not one? The only two

7 profiles in the house are the defendant's and the victim's?

8 Does that seem strange to anybody else?

9 Why would he say suicide? Because at that

10 point, it's so far gone you have got to say something. He's

11 committed himself to it. He's married himself to it and, by

12 God, he's going to stick with it all of the way through his

13 ten hours, not sixteen, his ten hours of interviews.

14 He talks about how he's being watched through

15 this little hole and he's crying and he's on his knees. You

16 know what he's saying? No, no, no.

17 You heard the 9-1-1. How could she do this to

18 me? Still at that stage, some hours later, he's blaming his

19 wife. How could she do this to me? How dare she? No, no,

20 no.

21 She's dying. She has terminal cancer. This is

22 the man she's married to. She has two daughters that aren't

23 his. She knows she's got to get her affairs in order, and he

24 knows that might cut him out.

25 Dr. Fahnestock talked about the slippers. I


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1147

1 would submit to you that he wasn't wearing the slippers when

2 he killed her.

3 What does he do when he gets out of the shower?

4 Slips his slippers on and comes out. There's the dog. He

5 then steps up close to get the dog away and, as he's giving

6 him a toss, now what? He's got to step out of them.

7 That's why there's no tracks. He realizes it.

8 The killer gets careless. That's how Betsy's voice gets

9 heard because the killer gets careless.

10 He talked about the palm prints. I like the

11 palm prints. The palm prints are on the inside of the

12 sliding door. How often do you open a sliding door like

13 this, except for when you don't want to touch the handle?

14 I got all kinds of kids' prints on my doors,

15 but none of mine like this.

16 MR. SCHWARTZ: I'm going to object to whether

17 there is evidence about what the prints are like.

18 MS. ASKEY: Withdrawn.

19 THE COURT: Sustained.

20 MR. SCHWARTZ: Thank you.

21 MS. ASKEY: Betsy says, you got a game tonight?

22 Yeah, I've got a game. He didn't.

23 He wants to show you the text messages. I tell

24 you, look at them because as soon as he realizes she's coming

25 home is when his plan starts.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1148

1 As soon as he realizes that she's got a ride

2 and she's coming back to Troy, he immediately, look at his

3 phone records, immediately he calls his mother and cancels.

4 Can't come tonight, Mom. Too many errands to run.

5 He goes and gets his gallon of gas and heads

6 down to pick up his cigarettes. That's when his plan starts.

7 Joel talks about the phone map and that his

8 phone is traveling south. We've never disagreed. His phone

9 definitely did travel south and his phone, if we want to

10 believe the guy who was on the stand, which I really don't

11 have any reason not to, his phone stayed down there.

12 Russ knows that. Remember, he's an IT guy. He

13 knows all of that kind of stuff and he knew it in advance.

14 It's a good way to say that I'm there even if

15 I'm not. I'll just leave it. Because it's my phone,

16 presumably it's with me. But yet I didn't use it at all.

17 Does it seem strange to you?

18 How about Brandon Sweeney and his receipt? Who

19 keeps a receipt 18 months after they buy a sandwich at Jack

20 in the Box? And not only keeps the receipt, but makes a

21 copy, keeps it in their wallet on their person and then lies

22 and says that law enforcement told them to do that? Who does

23 that?

24 You heard from the insurance agent that he

25 called on New Year's Day. I would submit to you that when


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1149

1 you have a loved one pass away, the funeral home takes care

2 of all of that. You're not calling the insurance company

3 yourself unless you really want to be sure you're getting

4 that money. That's a time of grieving, for most. That's

5 why you hire a funeral home. That's what they do.

6 Folks, we talked about reasonable inferences

7 and evidence. There isn't any evidence that points anywhere

8 else.

9 MR. SCHWARTZ: Objection, Your Honor. We

10 covered this in our earlier motion.

11 THE COURT: Sustained.

12 MR. SCHWARTZ: I ask that it be stricken.

13 THE COURT: The previous statement will be

14 stricken. The jury will be asked to disregard that

15 statement.

16 MS. ASKEY: There is no other evidence of DNA

17 in the house. There is a man and a woman's DNA, the woman's

18 of which is confirmed as Betsy's, on the light switch.

19 It's Betsy's blood on the top of his shoes and

20 Russell's DNA inside of his shoes. The paw print from the

21 dog matches that on the hip of those pants.

22 There's a positive reaction of Luminol, of Blue

23 Star, of cleaning agents, whatever you want it to be, in a

24 clear path from the body to the back door where the palm

25 prints are and a clear path to the drawer where the towels
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1150

1 are.

2 That's the evidence that you heard. Reasonable

3 inference. You are entitled to do that. We ask you to do

4 that.

5 You judge the credibility. You judge the

6 credibility of the witnesses. The alibi witnesses. Dr.

7 Fahnestock, law enforcement, the kids. It's your job to

8 judge their credibility.

9 Folks, in every crime scene, the victim leaves

10 behind a voice. In this case, Betsy Faria left her voice on

11 the light switch in her bedroom. She left her voice on the

12 slippers in her closet. She left her voice throughout her

13 kitchen on those positive reactors.

14 I would submit to you the very fact that they

15 were able to determine that she not only had sex but that she

16 had sex recently. Her voice.

17 She left it through her dog, Sicily. And when

18 law enforcement arrives on a scene, it's their job to look

19 and to try to find, try to hear that voice that the victim

20 leaves behind.

21 And once they do that, they compile the

22 evidence. They bring it to my office. Then it's my job to

23 try to hear that voice and try to seek justice.

24 Folks, I'm asking you, it's not beyond all

25 doubt. It's evidence that leaves you firmly convinced that


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1151

1 Russell Faria killed his wife.

2 I'm asking for you to hear Betsy's voice and

3 return a verdict of guilty.

4 THE COURT: If the Bailiff would please come

5 forward and raise your right hand.

6 (The Bailiff was sworn.)

7 THE COURT: Thank you. For the record, the

8 Court is noting it's 11:30 a.m.

9 At this time, would the Bailiff please deliver

10 the instructions to the jurors when they are in the jury

11 room, and the alternate jurors need to remain in the

12 Courtroom.

13 Please rise for the jury.

14 The jurors do get to take your notes with you

15 when you deliberate.

16 (The jurors left the Courtroom.)

17 THE COURT: For the record, the Court will read

18 to the Jurors Number 51, 58 and 61 their instruction.

19 Until you retire to consider your verdict as to

20 punishment, you must not discuss this case among yourselves

21 or with others or permit anyone to discuss it in your

22 hearing.

23 Do not do any research or investigation on your

24 own about any matter regarding this case or anyone involved

25 with the trial.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1152

1 Do not communicate with others about the case

2 by any means. Do not read, view or listen to any newspaper,

3 radio electronic communication from the Internet or

4 television report of the trial.

5 And now I guess we want the Bailiff to escort

6 them to their own room.

7 You can take your notes with you, as well, I

8 believe.

9 (Pause in proceedings.)

10 THE COURT: We're back on the record on

11 12L6-CR0001312, State of Missouri versus Russell Faria. The

12 jury has sent a request of items including Arby's receipt,

13 Jack in the Box receipt, pictures of house, in house, out

14 house, medical exam report, DNA report, CSI report, e-mails,

15 phone records, Detective reports, depositions from defense

16 witnesses, maps of phones, antennas, tours.

17 The Court has had a conference with all Counsel

18 and Counsel has agreed to reply as follows:

19 The Court hereby remits the items requested

20 except for the reports and depositions as those items were

21 not admitted into evidence.

22 The Court is giving all such items as agreed

23 upon by Counsel to the jury at 1:45 p.m., on November 21st,

24 2013.

25 (Pause in proceedings.)
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1153

1 THE COURT: We're on the record then in

2 12L6-CR001312, State of Missouri versus Russell Faria.

3 MR. SCHWARTZ: Judge, Mr. Faria is not here

4 yet.

5 THE COURT: Okay.

6 State, did you want to retrieve your exhibits?

7 MR. HICKS: Yes.

8 THE COURT: Ladies and gentlemen, at this time

9 it is the Court's belief that the jury has reached a verdict.

10 We're going to bring the jury back in.

11 We will ask if you would please remain in your

12 seats and please remain quiet.

13 If anybody does not believe that they can

14 contain their composure during the reading of the verdict, we

15 would ask if you would please exit the Courtroom before the

16 jury is brought in.

17 If you would please rise for the jury.

18 (The jury entered the Courtroom.)

19 THE COURT: Thank you. You may be seated.

20 For the record, we will read the numbers of

21 each juror into the record.

22 If you would please acknowledge your presence

23 by raising your hand. Juror 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 15, 27, 29, 35,

24 38, 38, 39 and 44.

25 For the record, all jurors are present.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1154

1 It is the Court's understanding that the jury

2 has reached a verdict. Will the foreperson please rise.

3 Sir, has the jury reached a verdict?

4 JUROR NUMBER 44: Yes.

5 THE COURT: Sir, would you please hand that

6 verdict to the Bailiff.

7 The Court noted that the foreperson has

8 returned the verdicts as well as the exhibits and the

9 instructions.

10 The Court has accounted for all of the verdict

11 forms at this point.

12 Would the defendant please rise to receive the

13 verdict?

14 As to Count I, we, the jury find Russell Faria

15 guilty of Murder in the First Degree as submitted in

16 Instruction No. 5.

17 We assess and declare the punishment for Murder

18 in the First Degree at imprisonment for life without

19 eligibility for probation or parole.

20 As to Count II, we, the jury find Russell Faria

21 guilty of Armed Criminal Action as submitted in Instruction

22 No. 9.

23 Mr. Foreperson, is this indeed the verdict of

24 the jury?

25 JUROR NUMBER 44: Yes, it is.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1155

1 THE COURT: Does either Counsel request that

2 the jurors be polled?

3 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, Your Honor.

4 THE COURT: Okay.

5 Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I will call

6 you by Juror Number and I will just ask you to acknowledge

7 whether or not that indeed was your verdict.

8 Juror Number 2, was that your verdict?

9 JUROR NUMBER 2: Yes, ma'am.

10 THE COURT: And Juror Number 3?

11 JUROR NUMBER 3: Yes.

12 THE COURT: Juror Number 4?

13 JUROR NUMBER 4: Yes.

14 THE COURT: Juror Number 11?

15 JUROR NUMBER 11: Yes.

16 THE COURT: Juror Number 12?

17 JUROR NUMBER 12: Yes.

18 THE COURT: Juror Number 15?

19 JUROR NUMBER 15: Yes.

20 THE COURT: Juror Number 27?

21 JUROR NUMBER 27: Yes.

22 THE COURT: Juror Number 29?

23 JUROR NUMBER 29: Yes.

24 THE COURT: Juror Number 35?

25 JUROR NUMBER 35: Yes.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1156

1 THE COURT: And Juror Number 38?

2 JUROR NUMBER 38: Yes.

3 THE COURT: And Juror Number 39?

4 JUROR NUMBER 39: Yes.

5 THE COURT: And Juror Number 44?

6 JUROR NUMBER 44: Yes.

7 THE COURT: So says the jury at this time.

8 Would defense counsel be asking for an

9 additional ten days to file a Motion for New Trial?

10 MR. SWANSON: Yes, Your Honor.

11 THE COURT: And, sir, you may be seated.

12 Do we need to set -- we can set a date for

13 further proceedings after the jury is discharged; is that

14 acceptable?

15 MS. ASKEY: Yes.

16 THE COURT: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury,

17 at this time the Court wishes to thank you for your service.

18 You were a vital part of our process, obviously, and of the

19 laws of the State of Missouri.

20 We do have for you paperwork from the Clerk to

21 indicate your presence in the event that any of you or all of

22 you would need paperwork.

23 You are free to go at this time. The Bailiffs

24 will escort you out and collect your numbers.

25 If any of you would like to remain in the


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1157

1 deliberation room where you were to ask questions of or to

2 speak to the State or Counsel for defendant, you are

3 certainly free to do that as well.

4 At this time we thank you and you are free to

5 go.

6 Please rise for the jury.

7 (The jury left the Courtroom.)

8 THE COURT: Would Counsel like to approach as

9 far as further proceedings?

10 MR. HICKS: I think there's one issue. The

11 defendant was found guilty of Count II of Armed Criminal

12 Action which, at this point, he's entitled to the sentencing

13 portion of it. I think --

14 MR. SCHWARTZ: We'll waive the sentencing

15 portion.

16 MR. HICKS: I just wanted to make sure we got

17 that on the record.

18 THE COURT: Okay. And then as far as the date

19 for sentencing?

20 MR. SCHWARTZ: What days do you usually do it?

21 THE COURT: Tell me what time frame you want to

22 look at and I'll --

23 MR. SCHWARTZ: I can tell you Friday, December

24 20th is bad. Beyond that, I got nothing the next week, which

25 is Christmas week.
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1158

1 THE COURT: Would Counsel be available Monday

2 the 23rd, the week of Christmas?

3 MR. SCHWARTZ: I can be here.

4 MS. ASKEY: I can be here.

5 THE COURT: I'm sorry?

6 MS. ASKEY: I can be here.

7 MR. SCHWARTZ: I'll be here.

8 THE COURT: Did you indicate that Friday, the

9 20th --

10 MR. SCHWARTZ: --is bad.

11 THE COURT: If you back up to Wednesday, the

12 18th or Tuesday, the 17th, would any of those work or Monday,

13 the 16th?

14 MR. SCHWARTZ: Is that 25 days? Do we have

15 enough time to get the motion out?

16 THE COURT: It should be because today is the

17 21st. I'm sorry. Yes, today is the 21st. December 20th

18 would be 30 days, right?

19 MR. SCHWARTZ: Something like that.

20 THE COURT: The 18th would be like 28 days. If

21 you just wanted to the 23rd, I can.

22 MR. SCHWARTZ: I have got a hearing in St.

23 Francis on the 18th. How about the 23rd?

24 THE COURT: If we do the 23rd, --

25 Bailiff, they need to clear the Courtroom.


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1159

1 We have a jury trial December 23rd is the only

2 issue, so I guess if we did it at 8:15. Does that work?

3 MS. ASKEY: The 18th?

4 THE COURT: The 23rd.

5 MR. SCHWARTZ: You are trying a jury trial on

6 the 23rd?

7 THE COURT: I'm open for business every day.

8 MS. ASKEY: What time?

9 THE COURT: I'd have to do 8:15 because if that

10 jury trial goes.

11 MS. ASKEY: 8:15 on the 23rd for sentencing.

12 THE COURT: Monday the 23rd.

13 MR. SWANSON: When is the motion due?

14 MR. SCHWARTZ: The motion would be due in 25

15 days. We'll have it filed pretty quickly.

16 THE COURT: Do you want a SAR?

17 MR. SCHWARTZ: No.

18 THE COURT: For the record, defense has not

19 requested a SAR.

20 Give me a minute. So we're going to set

21 sentencing on Monday, December 23rd at 8:15 and then for

22 purposes of filing motions, you have 25 days. I'm not sure

23 what the date is.

24 MR. SWANSON: It is the 16th.

25 THE COURT: Does somebody have a memo?


Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1160

1 For the record, the sentencing date is set for

2 December 23, 2013, at 8:15.

3 Motion for New Trial shall be filed on or

4 before December 16, 2013.

5 Court is in recess. We're off the record.

8 ***

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
Electronically Filed - EASTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS - July 23, 2014 - 07:34 PM
1161

1 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE

3 I, Cindy Ricks, Certified Court Reporter and Certified

4 Shorthand Reporter, do hereby certify that I am the Official

5 Court Reporter for Division 1 of the Circuit Court of the

6 County of Lincoln, State of Missouri; that on 2-20-13,

7 3-4-13, 5-21-13, 6-18-13, 7-2-13, 7-10-13, 10-28-13,

8 11-18-13, 11-19-13, 11-20-13, and 11-21-13, I was present

9 and reported the proceedings had in the above-entitled case;

10 and I further certify that the foregoing pages contain a true

11 and accurate reproduction of the proceedings had on said

12 dates.

13

14 /S/ Cindy Ricks


CINDY RICKS, CCR, CSR
15 Official Court Reporter
Forty-Fifth Judicial Circuit
16 State of Missouri

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

S-ar putea să vă placă și