FORM 2: LAC Facilitator Information Sheet

Region: CARAGA

Division: SURIGAO

NAME: Male/Female: Date of Birth: Age:

WILLY C. DUMPIT, PhD MALE OCTOBER 20, 1984 35

Contact details Email Mobile Number Facebook Name:

09999666393 willy.dumpit001@deped.gov.ph 09999666393 Wills Coloma Dumpit

Preferred contact mode (Indicate all: email, phone, Skype, Viber, WhatsApp, Zoom, Googlemeet, FB, Messenger, etc.)

ONLINE ZOOM, Googlemeet

FORM 3: LAC Session Report

LAC ID: REGION: CARAGA

LAC FACILITATOR: WILLY C. DUMPIT, PhD LAC SESSION NO.: 1

DATE AND TIME OF SESSION: VENUE/PLATFORM OF SESSION:

JULY 14, 2020 (9:00 AM – 10:00 AM) LINGIG CES / FACE TO FACE

Number of members present (attach attendance document):

Materials and resources

___ Self-Learning Module
___ Activity sheets
___ Digital resources
___ Online resources
___ Smartphone
___ PC
___ LAC session guide
___ Others. Please specify

        _______________________________________

FORM 3: LAC Session Report Part A

 SD D N A SA Comments / Remarks (For
example, if you disagree or
strongly disagree, please
indicate why.)

MEMBER PARTICIPATION

1. All of the members came prepared for the LAC session /

2. All of the members had an opportunity to share and /

discuss their assignment, insights, and ideas

3. Members listened to each other’s insights and ideas. /

4. The members’ assignments showed an understanding of /

the lessons in the SLM.

5. The members demonstrated engagement in and/or /

enthusiasm for the learning tasks during the session (including
providing feedback
on each other’s assignment).

FACILITATION

6. I managed the sharing and discussion during the LAC /

session by keeping the discussion focused on the lesson
or topic.
 7. I encouraged all the members to actively participate in /
the LAC session (i.e., for the teachers to share their work
and ideas/ insights).

8. I provided useful feedback on the teachers’ assignments. /

FORM 3: LAC Session Report Part B

1. The best part of the session (i.e. what went well):

 * Objectives and concepts were well-articulated.
* Attentiveness of participants in all parts of the session.
* Engagement of participants in all activities.

2. Problems or challenges encountered and how they were resolved:

* Results of Pre-Test were low. Answers were explained as the session progresses.
* Participants were confused with the framework. Facilitator substantiated the structure well.
* Participants were confused also with the outputs to be submitted and its deadline. Facilitator explained each needed
requirements per module and its timeline.

3. Other topics discussed apart from the recommended topics, if any:

* Gave Pre-Test (D.O. # 35, S. 2016)
* Discussed submission of Individual Learning Plan (ILP).
* Partly introduced Learning Delivery Modalities.

4. Recommendations/Plans for next LAC session:

* Since the facilitator is prohibited to handle sessions in the next module due to ADM QA concerns, other sessions might be
given through Online Modality so that the first facilitator could still join thereto.