Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Effect of Impurities on
Membrane Performance
& Recovery of Performance
June, 2012
Contents
General Information
1) Model of Impurity Deposits
2) Classification of Impurity Influences
1
Model of Ion Channel
Normal State
Hydrophobic Area
2
Basic Structure of Flemion Membrane
(High
Conductivity)
Woven Cloth
3
Deposition of Impurities
Mg
Cation Anion
Fe
S-Layer
Ni
Mg
SiO2
Al I/Ba
Ca
Sr I C-Layer
Ba
Deposits in Membranes
→Decrease Membrane Performance!
4
Main Deposit Position and Solubility
Solubility Product Constant
Ksp = [ Mn+ ] [ OH- ]n
Fe(OH)3 Impurity log(Ksp) pH at
[Mn+] = 10-7
Ni(OH)2
Fe -35 4.7
Mg(OH)2 pH: 15 Ni -16 9.5
Mg -12 11.5
pH: 12 Ca(OH)2 Ca -6 14.5
pH: 4
5
Influence of Accumulated Impurities in S-layer
Ni(OH)2
Mg(OH)2 pH: 15
pH: 12
pH: 4
6
Accumulate Effect in C-layer
pH: 15
pH: 12 Ca(OH)2
pH: 4 Ba/Iodine
7
Mechanism of High C.E. Performance
Normal State
8
C.E. Decline due to Fine Particle Precipitation
Particle Size < Ion Channel
9
C.E. Decline due to Large Particle Precipitation
Particle Size > Ion Channel
H 2O H 2O H2O
OH-
COO- COO-
10
Impurities Matrix
- SiO2 I
OH- Ex.) SiO3 2- Ex.) H2IO6 3-
SiO44-, Si2O76-
Fe
Fe3+
NiFe Fe (+ OH) Fe + SiO2 Fe +I
Ni2+
MgNi Ni (+ OH) Ni + SiO2 Ni +I
SiO
Mg2+2
AlMg Mg (+ OH) Mg + SiO2 Mg + I
Al3+
CaAl Al (+ OH) Al + SiO2 Al +I
SrCa CaI 2+ Ca (+ OH) Ca + SiO2 Ca +I
BaSr Sr2+ Sr (+ OH) Sr + SiO2 Sr +I
Ba Ba2+ Ba (+ OH) Ba + SiO2 Ba +I
- Na+ (Na) (+ OH) (Na) + SiO2 (Na) + I
12
Impurity Matrix of Harmful Combinations
- SiO2 I
OH- Ex.) SiO3 2- Ex.) H2IO6 3-
SiO44-, Si2O76-
Fe Fe3+ Fe (+ OH)
Ni Ni2+ Ni (+ OH)
Mg Mg2+ Mg (+ OH) Mg + SiO2
Al Al3+ Al (+ OH) Al + SiO2
Ca Ca2+ Ca (+ OH) Ca + SiO2 Ca +I
Sr Sr2+ Sr (+ OH) Sr + SiO2 Sr +I
Ba Ba2+ Ba (+ OH) Ba + SiO2 Ba +I
- Na+ (Na) + SiO2 (Na) + I
13
Structure of Precipitates
- SiO2 I
OH- Ex.) SiO3 2- Ex.) H2IO6 3-
SiO44-, Si2O76-
Fe Fe3+ Fe(OH)3
14
Influence of Impurities to Increase C.V.
- SiO2 I
OH- Ex.) SiO3 2- Ex.) H2IO6 3-
SiO44-, Si2O76-
Fe Fe3+ High
Ni Ni2+ High
Mg Mg2+ High High
Al Al3+ High High
Ca Ca2+ Low Low High
Sr Sr2+ Low Low High
Ba Ba2+ Low Low High
- Na+ Low High
15
Influence of Impurities to Decrease C.E.
- SiO2 I
OH- Ex.) SiO3 2- Ex.) H2IO6 3-
SiO44-, Si2O76-
Fe Fe3+ Low
Ni Ni2+ Low
Mg Mg2+ Low Low
Al Al3+ High High
Ca Ca2+ High High High
Sr Sr2+ High High High
Ba Ba2+ High High High
- Na+ High High
16
Main Position of Precipitation
- SiO2 I
OH- Ex.) SiO3 2- Ex.) 3-
H2IO6 or
S-layer
SiO44-, Si2O76- C-layer ?
Fe Fe3+ S-layer
Ni Ni2+ S-layer
Mg Mg2+ S-layer S-layer
Al Al3+ S & C-layer S & C-layer
Ca Ca2+ C-layer S & C-layer S & C-layer
Sr Sr2+ C-layer S & C-layer S & C-layer
Ba Ba2+ C-layer S & C-layer S & C-layer
- Na+ S & C-layer S & C-layer
*
17
Influence of Impurities on Cell Voltage
Increase of C.V. & Main Comments
Accumulation Position
- SiO2 I S or C
Fe High S Depending on brine acidity
Ca Low Low High S&C Rare cases & C.V. may recover partially
Sr Low Low High S&C Rare cases & C.V. may recover partially
18
Influence of Impurities on Current Efficiency
Decrease of C.E. & Main Comments
Accumulation Position
- SiO2 I S or C
Fe minor S
Mg minor minor S
19
Contents
General Information
1) Model of Impurity Deposits
2) Classification of Impurity Influences
20
Method: Impurities Addition Test
Measurement of C.V. and C.E. Analysis of
1) Effect & 2) Recovery Deposits
Si
C.E.
I
D.O.L. after addition
Fe or Ni or Mg or Al or Ca or Sr or Ba
21
Method: Analysis of Deposits
Analysis of
Deposits
1) Separate
“S-layer” & “C-layer”
3) Position
4) Quantity
2) Measure
Quantity of accumulations
of each layer by ICP
22
Influence of the Operating Conditions
mild severe
・Impurities Concentration low high
・Current Density low high
・Operating Temperature high low
・NaOH Concentration low high
・Brine Acidity depends on impurities
・Combinations of Impurities depends on impurities
23
Typical case; Impurity upset
(+) (-) Trouble in purification process
When impurities concentration exceeds
the secondary purification limit….
Brine will contain high conc. of impurities
95
90
Ca Upset
85
80
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Month
Ca upset : Influence of Ca Concentration
0
Ca = 1 ppm
-5
Ca = 2 ppm
Ca = 5 ppm
-10
-15
-5 0 5 10 15
25
Ca upset : Influence of Ca Addition Term
0
0.5 Hr addition
1 Hr addition
-5
4 Hr addition
-10
-5 0 5 10 15
26
Al + SiO2 : Influence of Current Density
2
200
150
100
50
6 kA/m 2
0
-50
0 5 10 15 20 25
27
Al + SiO2 : Influence of Current Density
F-8020 90 ℃, 32 % NaOH
2
Feed Brine Al / SiO2 = 1 / 30 ppm
0
ΔC.E.(%)
-2
-4
6 kA/m 2
-6
8 kA/m 2
-8
0 5 10 15 20 25
28
Sr + I : Influence of Operating Temp.
200
100
85 ℃
90 ℃
0
-100
0 5 10 15 20 25
29
Sr + I : Influence of Operating Temp.
90 ℃
-2
-4
-6 80 ℃
-8
85 ℃
0 5 10 15 20 25
30
Sr + I : Influence of NaOH Concentration
34 % NaOH
60
40
32 % NaOH
20
0
-20
0 5 10 15 20 25
-2
32% NaOH
-4
-6
-8
34% NaOH
-10
0 5 10 15 20 25
150
100
Depleted Brine
50 Analysis of membrane
pH = 4.5 Fe (μg/cm2)
0
S-layer : 240
-50
C-layer : <1
0 5 10 15 20 25
33
Fe: Influence of Brine Acidity on C.V.
pH = 2
150
100
Depleted Brine
50 Analysis of membrane
pH = 4.5 Fe (μg/cm2)
0
S-layer : 240
-50
C-layer : <1
0 5 10 15 20 25
34
Fe: Effect of Brine Acidity
Outside Inside
pH: 15 pH: 15
Fe(OH)3 Fe(OH)3
Standard Higher
acidity pH: 12 acidity pH: 12
pH: 4
Lower pH
35
Ca, Sr
90
ΔC.V.(mV)
60
30 Feed Brine
Ca = 0.2 ppm for 22 days
0
Feed Brine
-30 Sr = 5 ppm for 15 days
0 5 10 15 20 25
36
Ca, Sr, Ba + SiO2
0 5 10 15 20 25
D.O.L after start of addition
37
Ca, Sr, Ba + I
*I/Ba : 80 ℃
F-8020 6 kA/m2, 90 ℃, 32 % NaOH
120 Feed Brine
Ba = 1 ppm for 10 days
90
ΔC.V.(mV)
Feed Brine
60 Ca = 0.2 ppm for 15 days
30 Feed Brine
All Feed Brine Sr = 1 ppm for15 days
0
I = 20 ppm
-30
0 5 10 15 20 25
D.O.L after start of addition
38
Quantity of Accumulation
300
+ Iodine : high
Ca, Sr, Ba accumulations
200
(μg/cm2)
C
S
100
General Information
1) Model of Impurity Deposits
2) Classification of Impurity Influences
40
Analysis of Used Membranes from Customers
Multivariate Analysis
Q: Which ion is
“The worst impurity 230 data
for voltage increase” ? 230 data
of C.V.
41
Analysis of used Membranes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 230
This is just
Increased Voltage.
Amount of deposits
230
1 data
(μg / cm2)
C.V. (mV)
42
Method of Multivariate Analysis
⊿C.V. 1 : Increased Voltage (Sample No.1)
AE : Amount of Each Deposit (Fe, Ni, Mg, Al, Ca, Sr, Ba, I, SiO2)
KE : Conversion factor of each element (Fe, Ni, Mg, Al, Ca, Sr, Ba, I, SiO2)
⊿C.V.1 ≒ AFe× KFe + ANi× KNi + AMg× KMg + AAl× KAl + ACa× KCa + ASr× KSr + ABa× KBa + AI× KI + ASiO2× KSiO2
⊿C.V.2 ≒ AFe× KFe + ANi× KNi + AMg× KMg + AAl× KAl + ACa× KCa + ASr× KSr + ABa× KBa + AI× KI + ASiO2× KSiO2
⊿C.V.3 ≒ AFe× KFe + ANi× KNi + AMg× KMg + AAl× KAl + ACa× KCa + ASr× KSr + ABa× KBa + AI× KI + ASiO2× KSiO2
⊿C.V.4 ≒ AFe× KFe + ANi× KNi + AMg× KMg + AAl× KAl + ACa× KCa + ASr× KSr + ABa× KBa + AI× KI + ASiO2× KSiO2
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
⊿C.V.i ≒ AFe× KFe + ANi× KNi + AMg× KMg + AAl× KAl + ACa× KCa + ASr× KSr + ABa× KBa + AI× KI + ASiO2× KSiO2
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
⊿C.V.227 ≒ AFe× KFe + ANi× KNi + AMg× KMg + AAl× KAl + ACa× KCa + ASr× KSr + ABa× KBa + AI× KI + ASiO2× KSiO2
⊿C.V.228 ≒ AFe× KFe + ANi× KNi + AMg× KMg + AAl× KAl + ACa× KCa + ASr× KSr + ABa× KBa + AI× KI + ASiO2× KSiO2
⊿C.V.229 ≒ AFe× KFe + ANi× KNi + AMg× KMg + AAl× KAl + ACa× KCa + ASr× KSr + ABa× KBa + AI× KI + ASiO2× KSiO2
⊿C.V.230 ≒ AFe× KFe + ANi× KNi + AMg× KMg + AAl× KAl + ACa× KCa + ASr× KSr + ABa× KBa + AI× KI + ASiO2× KSiO2
Each KE are determined by application that leads by least squares method of these 230 formula.
43
Result : Analysis of Used Membranes
Total : 230 data Cause of CV increase
C.V.
Increase Unknown Ba + (I)
> 20 mV 34 %
No C.V.
Increase 92 data
Mg Fe (Al) + SiO2
(≦ 20 mV)
14 % 17 %
44
Contents
General Information
1) Model of Impurity Deposits
2) Classification of Impurity Influences
45
Recovery Methods
46
46
Contents
General Information
1) Model of Impurity Deposits
2) Classification of Impurity Influences
47
Developments of Flemion
F-8080
3rd Step
F-8020 SP & F-8051
2nd Step
F-8000 Series
New Generation polymer
1st Step
F-890 Series
48
Fe at High Brine Acidity
6 kA/m2, 90 ℃, 32 % NaOH
250
Feed Brine Fe = 5 ppm
200
ΔC.V.(mV)
-2
F-8020SP
-4
-6
F-8020
-8
-5 0 5 10
DOL after Addition
50
I / Ba = 20 / 1 ppm
-2
-4
F-8020SP
-6
F-8020
-8
-5 0 5 10 15
DOL after Addition
51
I / Ba = 20 / 1 ppm
6 kA/m2, 80 ℃, 32 % NaOH
120
F-8020
90
ΔC.V.(mV)
60
F-8020SP
30
F-8080
0
-30
0 5 10 15
52
I / Sr = 20 / 1 ppm
6 kA/m2, 90 ℃, 32 % NaOH
2
⇒I/ Sr=20/1ppm continuous addition
1
0
⊿C.E.(%)
-1
F-8080
-2
F-8020
-3
-4
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25
D.O.L. after addition
53
I / Sr = 20 / 1 ppm
6 kA/m2, 90 ℃, 32 % NaOH
60
F-8020
⊿CV (mV)
40
F-8020SP
20
F-8080
0
-20
-5 0 5 10 15 20
DOL after Addition
54
I / Ca=20 / 1 ppm
90
ΔC.V.(mV)
F-8020
60
30
0
F-8080
-30
0 5 10 15 20 25
D.O.L after addition
55
Features of F-808X
56
Contents
General Information
1) Model of Impurity Deposits
2) Classification of Impurity Influences
57
Thank you very much all for listening