Centre report

Number of teaching groups: 1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: English as a
Second Language
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019
Average Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scores are as Performance in each sub-strand
follows: For this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of
each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then
English as a Second Language (overall) Average score = 4.7
compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand
Listening Average score = 4.9 where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the
teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your
Reading Average score = 3.8 group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the
Usage Average score = 5.8 sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other
areas.
Writing Average score = 4.1
Listening
Ld Detail Performance was better than expected
Explanation of the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Lg Gist/global meaning Performance was worse than expected
scale: Lm Main idea Performance was as expected
‡Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 Lo Opinion/attitude/feeling Performance was as expected
(the lowest level of ability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability). Reading
Rd Detail Performance was worse than expected
‡Students achieving between 3.0 and 4.0 have a sound understanding of most Rf Function Performance was as expected
of the curriculum content. Rg Gist/global meaning Performance was worse than expected
Rm Main idea Performance was as expected
‡Students achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculum
content. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum. Usage
Uc Collocation Performance was better than expected
‡Students achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of the Ug General vocabulary Performance was better than expected
curriculum content. Uf Grammatical forms Performance was as expected
Ul Language range and appropriacy Performance was as expected
Ut Sentence structure Performance was better than expected
Writing
Wa Communicative achievement Performance was as expected
Note: Wc Content Performance was worse than expected
Wo Organisation Performance was as expected
Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this
page.
 Report on teaching group 1 - Part 1 : Summary
Name of teaching group: L1 L1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: English as a Second
Language
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019
Average Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scores for Performance in each sub-strand
this teaching group are as follows: For this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of
English as a Second Language (overall) Average score = 4.7 each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then
compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand
Listening Average score = 4.9 where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the
teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your
Reading Average score = 3.8 group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the
Usage Average score = 5.8 sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other
areas.
Writing Average score = 4.1
Listening
Explanation of the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint Ld Detail Performance was better than expected
Lg Gist/global meaning Performance was worse than expected
scale:
Lm Main idea Performance was as expected
‡Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the Lo Opinion/attitude/feeling Performance was as expected
lowest level of ability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability) Reading
Rd Detail Performance was worse than expected
‡Students achieving between 3.0 and 4.0 have a sound understanding of most Rf Function Performance was as expected
of the curriculum content. Rg Gist/global meaning Performance was worse than expected
Rm Main idea Performance was as expected
‡Student achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculum
content. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum. Usage
Uc Collocation Performance was better than expected
‡Student achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of the Ug General vocabulary Performance was better than expected
curriculum content. Uf Grammatical forms Performance was as expected
Ul Language range and appropriacy Performance was as expected
Ut Sentence structure Performance was better than expected

Writing
Wa Communicative achievement Performance was as expected
Note: Wc Content Performance was worse than expected
Wo Organisation Performance was as expected
Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this
page.
 Report on teaching group 1 - Part 2 : List of students' results
Name of teaching group: L1 L1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: English as a Second
Language
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Table of students' results

Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this page.
The overall score is given as a score on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale (0.0 to 6.0). This overall score is not a simple average of the candidate's separate strand scores.
It comes from both the strand score achieved and its precision. Note that the precision of a strand score is not constant, but depends on the strand score achieved.

Results (Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint

scores)
Student no. Student name English as a Listening Reading Usage Writing
Second
Language
1 AGAPE KAJURA 4.6 4.5 3.7 6.0 4.4
2 CYUSA BRIAN 5.2 4.8 4.0 6.0 6.0
4 INGABIRE AMELIE 4.8 5.1 4.5 5.7 3.1
5 ISHIMWE ALAIN LANDRY 4.7 5.1 4.0 6.0 3.1
6 MUGERWA HUSSNA 4.6 4.5 3.7 5.7 5.3
7 NKENGURUTSE KEN ASER 4.2 4.8 3.0 6.0 2.7
8 TETA KEZA IMMACULATE 4.8 5.5 4.0 5.3 4.4
Teaching group average 4.7 4.9 3.8 5.8 4.1
 Report on teaching group 1 - Part 3 : Marks scored on each question
Name of teaching group: L1 L1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: English as a Second
Language
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Table of marks scored by each student on each question

Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this page.

Paper 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Q No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 7 7 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3

and 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 C C C C O L 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0

part o A o A
n n

Strand U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R U U U U U W W W W W U L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
g g c c c c g c g g c f f f f f f f f f f f f f f m g g g m g g g m g d d d d d g d d d g t t t t t c a c a o l d d d d d m m m m m g g g g g o o d d o d d d d d o o o o o P1 P2 P3 Test Chkpt

Max 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 45 35 30 110

Students

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 5 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 34 30 24 88 4.6

2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 35 34 25 94 5.2

4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 4 5 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 37 27 26 90 4.8

5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 3 3 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 35 28 26 89 4.7

6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 4 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 34 30 24 88 4.6

7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 3 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 31 27 25 83 4.2

8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 5 5 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 35 28 27 90 4.8
 Statement of achievement

AGAPE KAJURA
Student number: 1 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Listening 4.5

Checkpoint English as a Second Language
Score: 4.6 Reading 3.7

Date: October 2019 Usage 6.0

Writing 4.4

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: AGAPE KAJURA Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: English as a Second
Language
Student number: 1 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
English as a Second Language (Overall) score = 4.6 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Listening score = 4.5 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Reading score = 3.7
Usage score = 6.0 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Writing score = 4.4 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
5 Usage Sentence structure 2
This is what the scores mean: 7O Writing Organisation 2
7L Usage Language range and appropriacy 2
6.0 -
4 Usage Sentence structure 2
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 12 Listening Gist/global meaning 3
OK 38 Reading Detail 1
2.0 -
6Con Writing Content 2
Poor
1.0 - 32 Reading Gist/global meaning 1
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

CYUSA BRIAN
Student number: 2 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Listening 4.8

Checkpoint English as a Second Language
Score: 5.2 Reading 4.0

Date: October 2019 Usage 6.0

Writing 6.0

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: CYUSA BRIAN Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: English as a Second
Language
Student number: 2 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
English as a Second Language (Overall) score = 5.2 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Listening score = 4.8 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Reading score = 4.0
Usage score = 6.0 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Writing score = 6.0 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
7O Writing Organisation 2
This is what the scores mean: 7L Usage Language range and appropriacy 2
7CA Writing Communicative achievement 2
6.0 -
5 Usage Sentence structure 2
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 12 Listening Gist/global meaning 3
OK 38 Reading Detail 1
2.0 -
6Con Writing Content 2
Poor
1.0 - 32 Reading Gist/global meaning 1
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

INGABIRE AMELIE
Student number: 4 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Listening 5.1

Checkpoint English as a Second Language
Score: 4.8 Reading 4.5

Date: October 2019 Usage 5.7

Writing 3.1

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: INGABIRE AMELIE Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: English as a Second
Language
Student number: 4 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
English as a Second Language (Overall) score = 4.8 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Listening score = 5.1 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Reading score = 4.5
Usage score = 5.7 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Writing score = 3.1 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
5 Usage Sentence structure 2
This is what the scores mean: 4 Usage Sentence structure 2
42 Reading Detail 1
6.0 -
26 Reading Main idea 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 13 Usage Grammatical forms 1
OK 7O Writing Organisation 2
2.0 -
12 Listening Gist/global meaning 3
Poor
1.0 - 38 Reading Detail 1
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

ISHIMWE ALAIN LANDRY

Student number: 5 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Listening 5.1

Checkpoint English as a Second Language
Score: 4.7 Reading 4.0

Date: October 2019 Usage 6.0

Writing 3.1

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: ISHIMWE ALAIN LANDRY Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: English as a Second
Language
Student number: 5 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
English as a Second Language (Overall) score = 4.7 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Listening score = 5.1 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Reading score = 4.0
Usage score = 6.0 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Writing score = 3.1 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
5 Usage Sentence structure 2
This is what the scores mean: 6CA Writing Communicative achievement 2
4 Usage Sentence structure 2
6.0 -
42 Reading Detail 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 12 Listening Gist/global meaning 3
OK 38 Reading Detail 1
2.0 -
32 Reading Gist/global meaning 1
Poor
1.0 - 7Con Writing Content 2
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

MUGERWA HUSSNA
Student number: 6 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Listening 4.5

Checkpoint English as a Second Language
Score: 4.6 Reading 3.7

Date: October 2019 Usage 5.7

Writing 5.3

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: MUGERWA HUSSNA Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: English as a Second
Language
Student number: 6 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
English as a Second Language (Overall) score = 4.6 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Listening score = 4.5 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Reading score = 3.7
Usage score = 5.7 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Writing score = 5.3 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
5 Usage Sentence structure 2
This is what the scores mean: 4 Usage Sentence structure 2
6CA Writing Communicative achievement 2
6.0 -
42 Reading Detail 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 12 Listening Gist/global meaning 3
OK 38 Reading Detail 1
2.0 -
10 Listening Main idea 3
Poor
1.0 - 32 Reading Gist/global meaning 1
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

NKENGURUTSE KEN ASER

Student number: 7 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Listening 4.8

Checkpoint English as a Second Language
Score: 4.2 Reading 3.0

Date: October 2019 Usage 6.0

Writing 2.7

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: NKENGURUTSE KEN ASER Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: English as a Second
Language
Student number: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
English as a Second Language (Overall) score = 4.2 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Listening score = 4.8 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Reading score = 3.0
Usage score = 6.0 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Writing score = 2.7 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
5 Usage Sentence structure 2
This is what the scores mean: 7L Usage Language range and appropriacy 2
4 Usage Sentence structure 2
6.0 -
8 Usage Collocation 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 27 Reading Gist/global meaning 1
OK 16 Listening Opinion/attitude/feeling 3
2.0 -
41 Reading Gist/global meaning 1
Poor
1.0 - 7Con Writing Content 2
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

TETA KEZA IMMACULATE

Student number: 8 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Listening 5.5

Checkpoint English as a Second Language
Score: 4.8 Reading 4.0

Date: October 2019 Usage 5.3

Writing 4.4

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: TETA KEZA IMMACULATE Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: English as a Second
Language
Student number: 8 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
English as a Second Language (Overall) score = 4.8 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Listening score = 5.5 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Reading score = 4.0
Usage score = 5.3 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Writing score = 4.4 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
16 Usage Grammatical forms 1
This is what the scores mean: 13 Listening Gist/global meaning 3
6CA Writing Communicative achievement 2
6.0 -
4 Usage Sentence structure 2
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 12 Listening Gist/global meaning 3
OK 38 Reading Detail 1
2.0 -
32 Reading Gist/global meaning 1
Poor
1.0 - 17 Usage Grammatical forms 1
Very poor
0.0 -
 Centre report
Number of teaching groups: 1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Mathematics
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019
Average Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scores are as Performance in each sub-strand
follows: For this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of
each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then
Mathematics (overall) Average score = 5.8
compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand
Algebra Average score = 5.8 where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the
teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your
Geometry and measure Average score = 5.8 group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the
Handling data Average score = 4.9 sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other
areas.
Number Average score = 5.7
Algebra
Explanation of the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint Ae Expressions, equations and formulae Performance was better than expected
As Sequences, functions and graphs Performance was as expected
scale:
Geometry and measure
‡Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 Ga Area, perimeter and volume Performance was better than expected
(the lowest level of ability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability). Gl Length, mass and capacity Performance was as expected
Gp Position and movement Performance was as expected
‡Students achieving between 3.0 and 4.0 have a sound understanding of most Gs Shapes and geometric reasoning Performance was worse than expected
of the curriculum content. Gt Time and rates of change Performance was as expected

‡Students achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculum Handling data
content. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum. Di Interpreting and discussing results Performance was as expected
Dp Planning and processing data Performance was as expected
‡Students achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of the Db Probability Performance was worse than expected
curriculum content. Number
Nc Calculation Performance was as expected
Nf Fractions, decimals, percentages, ratio and proportion Performance was as expected
Ni Integers, powers and roots Performance was as expected
Np Place value, ordering and rounding Performance was worse than expected
Note:
Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this
page.
 Report on teaching group 1 - Part 1 : Summary
Name of teaching group: M1 M1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Mathematics
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019
Average Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scores for Performance in each sub-strand
this teaching group are as follows: For this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of
Mathematics (overall) Average score = 5.8 each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then
compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand
Algebra Average score = 5.8 where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the
teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your
Geometry and measure Average score = 5.8 group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the
Handling data Average score = 4.9 sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other
areas.
Number Average score = 5.7
Algebra
Explanation of the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint Ae Expressions, equations and formulae Performance was better than expected
As Sequences, functions and graphs Performance was as expected
scale:
Geometry and measure
‡Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the Ga Area, perimeter and volume Performance was better than expected
lowest level of ability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability) Gl Length, mass and capacity Performance was as expected
Gp Position and movement Performance was as expected
‡Students achieving between 3.0 and 4.0 have a sound understanding of most Gs Shapes and geometric reasoning Performance was worse than expected
of the curriculum content. Gt Time and rates of change Performance was as expected

‡Student achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculum Handling data
content. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum. Di Interpreting and discussing results Performance was as expected
Dp Planning and processing data Performance was as expected
‡Student achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of the Db Probability Performance was worse than expected
curriculum content. Number
Nc Calculation Performance was as expected
Nf Fractions, decimals, percentages, ratio and proportion Performance was as expected
Ni Integers, powers and roots Performance was as expected
Np Place value, ordering and rounding Performance was worse than expected
Note:
Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this
page.
 Report on teaching group 1 - Part 2 : List of students' results
Name of teaching group: M1 M1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Mathematics
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Table of students' results

Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this page.
The overall score is given as a score on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale (0.0 to 6.0). This overall score is not a simple average of the candidate's separate strand scores.
It comes from both the strand score achieved and its precision. Note that the precision of a strand score is not constant, but depends on the strand score achieved.

Results (Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint

scores)
Student no. Student name Mathematics Algebra Geometry and Handling data Number
measure
1 AGAPE KAJURA 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.0
2 CYUSA BRIAN 5.5 5.4 5.2 4.5 6.0
4 INGABIRE AMELIE 6.0 6.0 5.7 5.7 6.0
5 ISHIMWE ALAIN LANDRY 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
6 MUGERWA HUSSNA 5.8 6.0 6.0 4.1 5.0
7 NKENGURUTSE KEN ASER 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.5 5.8
8 TETA KEZA IMMACULATE 5.4 5.4 5.9 4.5 5.3
Teaching group average 5.8 5.8 5.8 4.9 5.7
 Report on teaching group 1 - Part 3 : Marks scored on each question
Name of teaching group: M1 M1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Mathematics
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Table of marks scored by each student on each question

Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this page.

Paper 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Q No 1 2 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 8 8 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

and a b a b a b a b a b c 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 a b a b a b a b c 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

part a b a b c a b a b a b a b a b a b a b a b c a b a b

Strand G N N N N G G N N D D A A A N N N N N N A D D D G G A A N N A G G G N N N G D D N N D N G D D A G G G N N N A A D D A A A N G A D G G G A A G N G G N A
a f c c c t t c c p p s s s f f f f c f e p p i p p e e p p e a a s c c i s i i i i p p a b b e t t t f f f s s b b e e e i l s i p p p s s s f l s i s P1 P2 Test Chkpt

Max 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 50 50 100

Students

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 0 1 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 3 0 1 1 41 38 79 6.0

2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 39 30 69 5.5

4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 41 40 81 6.0

5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 0 1 1 46 46 92 6.0

6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 3 0 1 1 37 36 73 5.8

7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 3 2 1 2 0 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 38 42 80 6.0

8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 36 32 68 5.4
 Statement of achievement

AGAPE KAJURA
Student number: 1 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Algebra 6.0

Checkpoint Mathematics
Score: 6.0 Geometry and measure 6.0

Date: October 2019 Handling data 5.1

Number 6.0

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: AGAPE KAJURA Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Mathematics
Student number: 1 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Mathematics (Overall) score = 6.0 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Algebra score = 6.0 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Geometry and measure score = 6.0
Handling data score = 5.1 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Number score = 6.0 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
23 Geometry and measure Length, mass and capacity 2
This is what the scores mean: 18a Number Place value, ordering and rounding 1
21 Geometry and measure Shapes and geometric reasoning 1
6.0 -
25 Number Integers, powers and roots 2
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 12a Handling data Probability 2
OK 8a Geometry and measure Time and rates of change 2
2.0 -
8a Algebra Sequences, functions and graphs 1
Poor
1.0 - 4 Number Place value, ordering and rounding 2
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

CYUSA BRIAN
Student number: 2 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Algebra 5.4

Checkpoint Mathematics
Score: 5.5 Geometry and measure 5.2

Date: October 2019 Handling data 4.5

Number 6.0

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: CYUSA BRIAN Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Mathematics
Student number: 2 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Mathematics (Overall) score = 5.5 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Algebra score = 5.4 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Geometry and measure score = 5.2
Handling data score = 4.5 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Number score = 6.0 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
21 Geometry and measure Shapes and geometric reasoning 1
This is what the scores mean: 23 Number Calculation 1
25 Number Integers, powers and roots 2
6.0 -
20a Geometry and measure Area, perimeter and volume 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 2b Number Integers, powers and roots 2
OK 4 Number Place value, ordering and rounding 2
2.0 -
5 Geometry and measure Area, perimeter and volume 2
Poor
1.0 - 12b Handling data Probability 2
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

INGABIRE AMELIE
Student number: 4 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Algebra 6.0

Checkpoint Mathematics
Score: 6.0 Geometry and measure 5.7

Date: October 2019 Handling data 5.7

Number 6.0

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: INGABIRE AMELIE Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Mathematics
Student number: 4 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Mathematics (Overall) score = 6.0 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Algebra score = 6.0 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Geometry and measure score = 5.7
Handling data score = 5.7 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Number score = 6.0 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
25 Number Integers, powers and roots 2
This is what the scores mean: 20a Geometry and measure Area, perimeter and volume 1
17b Algebra Expressions, equations and formulae 1
6.0 -
17 Handling data Interpreting and discussing results 2
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 25 Geometry and measure Shapes and geometric reasoning 1
OK 23 Geometry and measure Length, mass and capacity 2
2.0 -
8c Algebra Sequences, functions and graphs 1
Poor
1.0 - 12a Handling data Probability 2
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

ISHIMWE ALAIN LANDRY

Student number: 5 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Algebra 6.0

Checkpoint Mathematics
Score: 6.0 Geometry and measure 6.0

Date: October 2019 Handling data 6.0

Number 6.0

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: ISHIMWE ALAIN LANDRY Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Mathematics
Student number: 5 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Mathematics (Overall) score = 6.0 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Algebra score = 6.0 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Geometry and measure score = 6.0
Handling data score = 6.0 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Number score = 6.0 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
23 Geometry and measure Length, mass and capacity 2
This is what the scores mean: 25 Number Integers, powers and roots 2
20a Geometry and measure Area, perimeter and volume 1
6.0 -
21 Geometry and measure Shapes and geometric reasoning 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 21 Geometry and measure Shapes and geometric reasoning 2
OK 19b Geometry and measure Position and movement 2
2.0 -
24 Number Integers, powers and roots 1
Poor
1.0 - 18a Number Place value, ordering and rounding 1
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

MUGERWA HUSSNA
Student number: 6 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Algebra 6.0

Checkpoint Mathematics
Score: 5.8 Geometry and measure 6.0

Date: October 2019 Handling data 4.1

Number 5.0

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: MUGERWA HUSSNA Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Mathematics
Student number: 6 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Mathematics (Overall) score = 5.8 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Algebra score = 6.0 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Geometry and measure score = 6.0
Handling data score = 4.1 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Number score = 5.0 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
23 Geometry and measure Length, mass and capacity 2
This is what the scores mean: 21 Geometry and measure Shapes and geometric reasoning 1
25 Number Integers, powers and roots 2
6.0 -
20a Geometry and measure Area, perimeter and volume 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 6b Handling data Probability 2
OK 1b Handling data Interpreting and discussing results 2
2.0 -
9 Number Fractions, decimals, percentages, ratio and proportion 2
Poor
1.0 - 4 Number Place value, ordering and rounding 2
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

NKENGURUTSE KEN ASER

Student number: 7 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Algebra 6.0

Checkpoint Mathematics
Score: 6.0 Geometry and measure 6.0

Date: October 2019 Handling data 4.5

Number 5.8

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: NKENGURUTSE KEN ASER Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Mathematics
Student number: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Mathematics (Overall) score = 6.0 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Algebra score = 6.0 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Geometry and measure score = 6.0
Handling data score = 4.5 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Number score = 5.8 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
23 Geometry and measure Length, mass and capacity 2
This is what the scores mean: 24 Geometry and measure Shapes and geometric reasoning 2
25 Number Integers, powers and roots 2
6.0 -
20a Geometry and measure Area, perimeter and volume 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 1b Handling data Interpreting and discussing results 2
OK 10b Number Fractions, decimals, percentages, ratio and proportion 1
2.0 -
3 Handling data Planning and processing data 2
Poor
1.0 - 9 Number Fractions, decimals, percentages, ratio and proportion 2
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

TETA KEZA IMMACULATE

Student number: 8 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Algebra 5.4

Checkpoint Mathematics
Score: 5.4 Geometry and measure 5.9

Date: October 2019 Handling data 4.5

Number 5.3

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: TETA KEZA IMMACULATE Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Mathematics
Student number: 8 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Mathematics (Overall) score = 5.4 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Algebra score = 5.4 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Geometry and measure score = 5.9
Handling data score = 4.5 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Number score = 5.3 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
23 Geometry and measure Length, mass and capacity 2
This is what the scores mean: 21 Geometry and measure Shapes and geometric reasoning 1
18a Number Place value, ordering and rounding 1
6.0 -
13c Algebra Expressions, equations and formulae 2
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 9 Number Fractions, decimals, percentages, ratio and proportion 1
OK 8b Geometry and measure Time and rates of change 2
2.0 -
8a Algebra Sequences, functions and graphs 1
Poor
1.0 - 4 Number Place value, ordering and rounding 2
Very poor
0.0 -
 Centre report
Number of teaching groups: 1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Science
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019
Average Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scores are as Performance in each sub-strand
follows: For this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of
each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then
Science (overall) Average score = 4.4
compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand
Biology Average score = 5.3 where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the
teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your
Chemistry Average score = 4.6 group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the
Physics Average score = 4.4 sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other
areas.
Scientific enquiry Average score = 3.3
Biology
Explanation of the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint Bc Cells and organisms Performance was as expected
Bh Humans as organisms Performance was as expected
scale: Be Living things in their environment Performance was as expected
‡Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 Bp Plants Performance was better than expected
(the lowest level of ability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability). Bv Variation and classification Performance was as expected
Chemistry
‡Students achieving between 3.0 and 4.0 have a sound understanding of most Cc Material changes Performance was better than expected
of the curriculum content. Cp Material properties Performance was as expected
Cs States of matter Performance was worse than expected
‡Students achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculum Ce The Earth Performance was as expected
content. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum.
Physics
‡Students achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of the Pm Electricity and magnetism Performance was as expected
curriculum content. Pe Energy Performance was as expected
Pf Forces and motion Performance was as expected
Pl Light Performance was as expected
Ps Sound Performance was worse than expected
Pb The Earth and beyond Performance was as expected

Note: Scientific enquiry

Ec Considering evidence and approach Performance was as expected
Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this Eo Obtaining and presenting evidence Performance was worse than expected
page. Ep Planning from ideas and evidence Performance was worse than expected
 Report on teaching group 1 - Part 1 : Summary
Name of teaching group: S1 S1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Science
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019
Average Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scores for Performance in each sub-strand
this teaching group are as follows: For this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of
Science (overall) Average score = 4.4 each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then
compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand
Biology Average score = 5.3 where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the
teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your
Chemistry Average score = 4.6 group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the
Physics Average score = 4.4 sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other
areas.
Scientific enquiry Average score = 3.3
Biology
Explanation of the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint Bc Cells and organisms Performance was as expected
Bh Humans as organisms Performance was as expected
scale:
Be Living things in their environment Performance was as expected
‡Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the Bp Plants Performance was better than expected
lowest level of ability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability) Bv Variation and classification Performance was as expected

Chemistry
‡Students achieving between 3.0 and 4.0 have a sound understanding of most Cc Material changes Performance was better than expected
of the curriculum content. Cp Material properties Performance was as expected
Cs States of matter Performance was worse than expected
‡Student achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculum Ce The Earth Performance was as expected
content. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum.
Physics
‡Student achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of the Pm Electricity and magnetism Performance was as expected
curriculum content. Pe Energy Performance was as expected
Pf Forces and motion Performance was as expected
Pl Light Performance was as expected
Ps Sound Performance was worse than expected
Pb The Earth and beyond Performance was as expected
Note: Scientific enquiry
Ec Considering evidence and approach Performance was as expected
Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this Obtaining and presenting evidence Performance was worse than expected
Eo
page. Planning from ideas and evidence Performance was worse than expected
Ep
 Report on teaching group 1 - Part 2 : List of students' results
Name of teaching group: S1 S1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Science
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Table of students' results

Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this page.
The overall score is given as a score on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale (0.0 to 6.0). This overall score is not a simple average of the candidate's separate strand scores.
It comes from both the strand score achieved and its precision. Note that the precision of a strand score is not constant, but depends on the strand score achieved.

Results (Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint

scores)
Student no. Student name Science Biology Chemistry Physics Scientific enquiry
1 AGAPE KAJURA 4.2 5.1 4.9 4.0 2.8
2 CYUSA BRIAN 4.4 5.4 5.5 3.7 3.0
4 INGABIRE AMELIE 4.2 4.6 4.1 4.5 3.5
5 ISHIMWE ALAIN LANDRY 4.5 5.1 4.1 5.5 3.3
6 MUGERWA HUSSNA 4.3 6.0 4.1 4.2 2.8
7 NKENGURUTSE KEN ASER 5.1 5.8 5.5 4.7 4.1
8 TETA KEZA IMMACULATE 4.4 4.8 4.3 4.5 3.8
Teaching group average 4.4 5.3 4.6 4.4 3.3
 Report on teaching group 1 - Part 3 : Marks scored on each question
Name of teaching group: S1 S1 Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Science
Number of students: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Table of marks scored by each student on each question

Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this page.

Paper 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Q No 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 9 9 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

and a b b a b c a b a b b a b b a b c d a b c 0 0 1 1 2 2 a b a b a b c a a b b a b a a b 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 6 6

part i i i i i i a b a b a b i i i i i i a b a b a b c
i i i i i i

Strand B B B C C C P B B C C C B B B E E E E C C C P B B E E P P B C C P P P B E E E C C C C P P B B B C C P C P E P P C C C
c c c s s s s v v p p c e e e c c c c c c c m h h p c b b p e e f f l h o o o p p p p l l p p p e e e c e p m m c c c P1 P2 Test Chkpt

Max 2 2 2 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 4 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 50 50 100

Students

1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 27 36 63 4.2

2 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 2 1 2 1 0 3 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 30 36 66 4.4

4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 0 3 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 2 2 2 1 2 1 26 37 63 4.2

5 2 2 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 2 2 2 1 0 3 1 1 3 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 2 1 2 2 2 1 0 0 35 33 68 4.5

6 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 0 2 1 2 1 0 3 1 1 3 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 1 33 32 65 4.3

7 0 2 0 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 0 2 1 2 1 0 3 1 0 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 37 38 75 5.1

8 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 0 3 1 0 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 0 32 34 66 4.4
 Statement of achievement

AGAPE KAJURA
Student number: 1 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Biology 5.1

Checkpoint Science
Score: 4.2 Chemistry 4.9

Date: October 2019 Physics 4.0

Scientific enquiry 2.8

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: AGAPE KAJURA Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Science
Student number: 1 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Science (Overall) score = 4.2 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Biology score = 5.1 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Chemistry score = 4.9
Physics score = 4.0 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Scientific enquiry score = 2.8 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
9b Biology Plants 2
This is what the scores mean: 8b Physics Light 2
9aii Biology Plants 2
6.0 -
12 Chemistry Material changes 2
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 2b Chemistry The Earth 2
OK 2b Chemistry States of matter 1
2.0 -
3 Physics Sound 1
Poor
1.0 - 11a Scientific enquiry Planning from ideas and evidence 1
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

CYUSA BRIAN
Student number: 2 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Biology 5.4

Checkpoint Science
Score: 4.4 Chemistry 5.5

Date: October 2019 Physics 3.7

Scientific enquiry 3.0

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: CYUSA BRIAN Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Science
Student number: 2 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Science (Overall) score = 4.4 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Biology score = 5.4 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Chemistry score = 5.5
Physics score = 3.7 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Scientific enquiry score = 3.0 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
1bi Biology Cells and organisms 1
This is what the scores mean: 9b Biology Plants 2
6a Biology Living things in their environment 1
6.0 -
16b Chemistry Material changes 2
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 9 Physics Electricity and magnetism 1
OK 11a Scientific enquiry Planning from ideas and evidence 1
2.0 -
3 Physics Sound 1
Poor
1.0 - 6b Scientific enquiry Obtaining and presenting evidence 2
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

INGABIRE AMELIE
Student number: 4 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Biology 4.6

Checkpoint Science
Score: 4.2 Chemistry 4.1

Date: October 2019 Physics 4.5

Scientific enquiry 3.5

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: INGABIRE AMELIE Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Science
Student number: 4 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Science (Overall) score = 4.2 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Biology score = 4.6 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Chemistry score = 4.1
Physics score = 4.5 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Scientific enquiry score = 3.5 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
9b Biology Plants 2
This is what the scores mean: 16b Chemistry Material changes 2
8b Physics Light 2
6.0 -
10a Biology Humans as organisms 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 11a Scientific enquiry Planning from ideas and evidence 1
OK 3 Physics Sound 1
2.0 -
6a Scientific enquiry Obtaining and presenting evidence 2
Poor
1.0 - 2c Chemistry States of matter 1
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

ISHIMWE ALAIN LANDRY

Student number: 5 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Biology 5.1

Checkpoint Science
Score: 4.5 Chemistry 4.1

Date: October 2019 Physics 5.5

Scientific enquiry 3.3

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: ISHIMWE ALAIN LANDRY Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Science
Student number: 5 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Science (Overall) score = 4.5 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Biology score = 5.1 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Chemistry score = 4.1
Physics score = 5.5 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Scientific enquiry score = 3.3 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
1bi Biology Cells and organisms 1
This is what the scores mean: 6a Biology Living things in their environment 1
8b Physics Light 2
6.0 -
12b Physics The Earth and beyond 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 2b Chemistry States of matter 1
OK 6c Scientific enquiry Obtaining and presenting evidence 2
2.0 -
7aii Chemistry Material properties 2
Poor
1.0 - 11a Scientific enquiry Planning from ideas and evidence 1
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

MUGERWA HUSSNA
Student number: 6 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Biology 6.0

Checkpoint Science
Score: 4.3 Chemistry 4.1

Date: October 2019 Physics 4.2

Scientific enquiry 2.8

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: MUGERWA HUSSNA Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Science
Student number: 6 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Science (Overall) score = 4.3 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Biology score = 6.0 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Chemistry score = 4.1
Physics score = 4.2 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Scientific enquiry score = 2.8 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
1bi Biology Cells and organisms 1
This is what the scores mean: 6a Biology Living things in their environment 1
8b Physics Light 2
6.0 -
10a Biology Humans as organisms 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 2b Chemistry States of matter 1
OK 6c Scientific enquiry Obtaining and presenting evidence 2
2.0 -
3 Physics Sound 1
Poor
1.0 - 6b Scientific enquiry Obtaining and presenting evidence 2
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

NKENGURUTSE KEN ASER

Student number: 7 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Biology 5.8

Checkpoint Science
Score: 5.1 Chemistry 5.5

Date: October 2019 Physics 4.7

Scientific enquiry 4.1

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: NKENGURUTSE KEN ASER Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Science
Student number: 7 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Science (Overall) score = 5.1 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Biology score = 5.8 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Chemistry score = 5.5
Physics score = 4.7 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Scientific enquiry score = 4.1 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
1bi Biology Cells and organisms 1
This is what the scores mean: 9b Biology Plants 2
6a Biology Living things in their environment 1
6.0 -
2a Chemistry States of matter 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 11b Scientific enquiry Considering evidence and approach 1
OK 2b Chemistry The Earth 2
2.0 -
1a Biology Cells and organisms 1
Poor
1.0 - 11a Scientific enquiry Planning from ideas and evidence 1
Very poor
0.0 -
 Statement of achievement

TETA KEZA IMMACULATE

Student number: 8 Centre name: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Centre number: RW009

Overall result Strand results

Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Biology 4.8

Checkpoint Science
Score: 4.4 Chemistry 4.3

Date: October 2019 Physics 4.5

Scientific enquiry 3.8

Explanatory notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of
achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint tests.
 Report to student
To be given to the student with the statement of achievement

Student name: TETA KEZA IMMACULATE Centre: BLUE LAKES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Subject: Science
Student number: 8 Centre number: RW009 Date: October 2019

Your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint What you got right and what you got wrong
results are as follows: Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Lower Secondary Checkpoint
Science (Overall) score = 4.4 score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They
Biology score = 4.8 may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work
harder at.
Chemistry score = 4.3
Physics score = 4.5 Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult
Scientific enquiry score = 3.8 Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
9b Biology Plants 2
This is what the scores mean: 12b Physics The Earth and beyond 1
8b Physics Light 2
6.0 -
10a Biology Humans as organisms 1
Excellent
5.0 -
Very good Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy
4.0 -
Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper
Good
3.0 - 3 Physics Sound 1
OK 2b Chemistry The Earth 2
2.0 -
1 Biology Plants 2
Poor
1.0 - 2b Chemistry States of matter 1
Very poor
0.0 -