Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
: Supervisor
:Co-supervisor
2020
Seminar (2)
Since this study aims to investigate the religious identity in the two
fictive works (TFA and TBS) it is important to know more about the
nexus between religion, identity, communication, culture and the study of
language.
The term identity refers to the self-concept one has about himself and the
others have about him. Identity is originally studied in the field of
psychology, sociology and human science. However, this study points out
its connection with the field of linguistics. That is, the study posits that
identity is formed and perceived through communication. Without
encountering with others it is not easy to know them and even to know
oneself. Many linguists highlighted the necessity of communication in
shaping and conceptualizing identity (Martin and Nakayama 2010, Ting-
Toomey 2015).
As the study explores the identity concept in two intercultural sort of data
(the above-mentioned novels) it is desirable to draw the attention to the
matter of the difference in cultures and its influence on communication.
The study, thus, argues that culture is the context of language and the user
of any language depends on the cultural background he or she has to
convey meanings and be understood by others. That is, the interpretation
of the verbal or non-verbal languages depends on the knowledge of the
cultural symbols the two communicators shares. The more cultural
understanding one has the better communicator he is.
The study also argues that identity refers to the concept of belonging, that
is, every individual may affiliate to a number of social and cultural
groups. The same person may have a sense of belonging to his country,
religion, region, tribe, class, family, etc. The degree of affiliation differs
from one person to another and even the same individual has different
degrees of connection with each of these dimensions. This could clearer
when the individual falls in contradiction between two or more of these
orientations. For example, the family habit may contradict the religious
belief, so the family member is caught between these two contradicted
forces. In case of such discrepancy this study assumes that the individuals
is expected to behave according to the most influential identity dimension
(family or religion). That is, the item that is deeply rooted in the
individual's life is the one that works most. Thus, this study adopts such
kind of comparison as a measurement by which religiosity can be
measured. The person or the action can be categorized as religious when
it has pure religious motivation, particularly if it is contradicted by the
attraction of another identity dimension. The current study, therefore,
attempts to explore the influence of religion on the other identity
dimensions and the effect of these dimensions and the other cultural
factors on the religious attitude.