Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
net/publication/237402245
CITATIONS READS
25 828
3 authors:
Haejung Kim
University of North Texas
3 PUBLICATIONS 139 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Dee K. Knight on 25 July 2014.
The Impact of Retail Work Experience, Career Expectation, and Job Satisfaction on Retail
Career Intention
Dee K. Knight, Christy Crutsinger and HaeJung Kim
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 2006 24: 1
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X0602400101
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Additional services and information for Clothing and Textiles Research Journal can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://ctr.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://ctr.sagepub.com/content/24/1/1.refs.html
What is This?
Downloaded from ctr.sagepub.com at Presbyterian Univ of East on May 31, 2013
The Impact of Retail Work Experience, Career Expecta-
tion, and Job Satisfaction on Retail Career Intention
Dee K. Knight, Christy Crutsinger, HaeJung Kim
Key Words
Career Expectation, Career Intention, Job Satisfaction, Retail, Work Experience
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to examine the impact of retail work experience, career expectation,
and job satisfaction on college students’ intention to pursue retail careers. The 470 students who
completed self-administered questionnaires were enrolled in academic programs with a merchandis-
ing focus. Using multiple regression analyses to test the hypothesized relationships, work experience
and job satisfaction were significantly related to career intention. Emotional satisfaction was the most
robust determinant of students’ career intention. However, students’ expectation concerning opportu-
nity and success also were predictors of career intention. Understanding these relationships is benefi-
cial for educators as they prepare students for retail careers.
I
n an industry that employs over four million ly, young employees often develop negative percep-
people, retailers are challenged to attract, re- tions of retail careers while working part-time.
cruit, and retain a competent workforce. This
challenge is exacerbated by the prediction that the Swinyard (1981) confirmed that negative percep-
retail workforce is expected to increase by 4.2% tions of retailing careers existed among college stu-
between 2000 and 2010 (U.S. Department of Labor, dents enrolled in marketing courses. In a replicated
2002a). Compounding the problem is the fact that study, Swinyard et al. (1991) found that students’
the retail industry’s voluntary turnover rate of 38% perceptions of retailing continued to decline. Al-
in 2002 was the highest of any industry. Retailers though students who took a retail course described
also must combat the stereotypical perceptions retail careers more positively than others, over time
of their industry, including long hours, low pay, even those students found retailing less appealing.
and unfavorable work-life issues (Feinberg, 1996; Swinyard et al. further noted that the appeal of
Rhoads, Swinyard, Geurts, & Price, 2002; Swin- retailing was influenced more by associated charac-
yard, Langrehr, & Smith, 1991). teristics of the job such as length of the workweek
and the financial benefits than by functional as-
Typically one-third of all retail workers are under pects of the job.
24 years old and employed part-time (U.S. Depart-
ment of Labor, 2002b). Young employees tend to Even college students who have completed aca-
view part-time employment as an encapsulated demic retail programs and have retail work expe-
experience with minimal implications for their fu- rience often choose not to pursue retail careers.
tures (Schneider & Stevenson, 1999). Unfortunate- Broadbridge (2003) found that work experience
was instrumental in determining retail career deci-
Authors’ Address: University of North Texas, School of Mer- sions of students enrolled in business and market-
chandising and Hospitality Management, P.O. Box 311100, ing courses. Positive retail work experience had, at
Denton, TX 76203-31100. least for some students, increased their awareness
H3: College students’ career expectation has a di- support (∝ = .71) and 5-item work involvement
rect effect on retail job satisfaction. (∝ = .76) scales. We developed a 14-item scale
to measure career expectation. The 25-item
H4: College students’ career expectation has a di- job satisfaction scale was a modified version of
rect effect on retail career intention. Churchill, Ford, and Walker’s (1974) measure-
ment of job satisfaction. The scale measured satis-
H5: College students’ job satisfaction has a direct faction related to the job (∝ = .88), opportunities
effect on retail career intention. and advancement (∝ = .87), and pay (∝ = .89).
Singh’s (2000) three-item scale (α = .78) measured
students’ intentions to pursue retail careers. De-
Method mographic information was generated from the
questionnaire (e.g., age, gender, major, years of
Research Instrument retail experience, hours worked per week, and job
responsibilities).
A self-administered questionnaire was developed
to measure the constructs of work experience, Data Collection
career expectation, and job satisfaction and their
relationships to retail career intention. All items Data were collected from students representing
were measured using 5-point Likert type scales. geographically diverse areas of the United States.
Work experience was measured by 24 items com- The convenience sample drawn from eight univer-
prised of four subscales. The subscales consisted sities targeted students enrolled in courses offered
of Rizzo et al.’s (1970) 8-item role conflict (∝ = by academic programs with a merchandising focus
.82) and 6-item role ambiguity (∝ = .81) scales (e.g., fashion merchandising, retail and consumer
and Babin and Boles’ (1996) 5-item supervisory studies). These programs were selected because
Factor Explained
Factor name Scale itemsab loading variance (%) ∝
Role conflict I sometimes have to bend a rule or policy to carry out .727 11.59 .69
an assignment.
I do things that may be accepted by one person but not .700
by others.
I work with two or more groups who operate differently. .666
I receive incompatible requests from two or more people. .618
Role ambiguity I know exactly what is expected of me. -.774 14.34 .76
I know what my responsibilities are. -.770
There are clear, planned goals and objectives for my job. -.658
I usually feel certain about how much authority I have. -.598
Explanations are clear about what has to be done. -.597
Supervisory support Supervisors often criticize employees over minor things. .756 14.30 .78
My retail supervisors tend to “talk down” to employees. .737
They usually give employees full credit for their ideas. .686
Retail supervisors really stand up for employees. .634
Supervisors expect too much from employees. .624
Work involvement Few people ever volunteer. .743 13.17 .75
It is hard to get people to do any extra work. .715
A lot of people seem to be just putting in their time. .651
People put quite a lot of effort into what they do. .643
People seem to take pride in the retail organization. .602
Note. n = 470.
a
Range: 1 = always false; 5 = always true.
b
Scale items with factor loadings below .50 include the following: (1) I work on unnecessary things; (2) I receive assignments
without adequate resources or materials to do them; (3) I work with two or more groups who operate differently; (4) I know
that I have managed my time properly; and (5) I am required to do things that could be done more efficiently.
Factor Explained
Factor name Scale itemsab loading variance (%) ∝
Note. n = 470.
a
Range: 1 = not important; 5 = very important.
b
Scales items with factor loadings less than .50 include the following: (1) Opportunities to con-
tribute to company success; (2) Work-related travel; (3) Work/family balance; and (4) Oppor-
tunities to make a contribution to society.
Factor Explained
Factor name Scale itemsab loading variance (%) ∝
Note. n = 470.
a
Range: 1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree.
b
Scale items with factor loadings less than .50 include the following: (1) My work is unproductive; (2) My work is useless;
(3) Working in retail is challenging; (4) Retail jobs are often dull and monotonous; (5) I am paid fairly compared to other
employees in the company; (6) Job performance largely determines pay in retail; (7) Promotion in retail companies is based on
ability; (8) Regular promotions are the rule in retail companies; and (9) Retail companies have unfair promotion policies.
opportunity dimension included three items that satisfaction with financial compensation. Scale reli-
investigated the degree to which participants ex- abilities ranged from .68 to .92 (see Table 3).
pected to advance within their careers. The success
dimension included three items measuring career Hypotheses Testing
path and pay.
To examine hypothesized relationships, multiple re-
Job satisfaction dimensions. A principal compo- gression was employed using the enter method that
nent factor analysis with varimax rotation of the allowed us to scrutinize the contribution of each
job satisfaction scale resulted in four dimensions independent variable to the regression models. Step-
we labeled emotional, value, pay, and advance- wise regression was employed to determine the best
ment. These dimensions accounted for 67.76% of predictors of students’ career intentions. The three-
the variance. The emotional dimension included item scale was summed to form the career intention
five items measuring satisfaction with the affective measure (Singh, 2000). The Variance Inflation Factor
characteristics of retail jobs. The second dimension, (VIF) was calculated to determine the effect of mul-
advancement, contained five items that measured ticollinearity. A common cutoff threshold is a toler-
retail career opportunities. The third dimension, ance value of .10, which corresponds to a VIF value
value, included three items measuring the intrinsic of above 10 (Hair et al., 1998; Neter, Wasserman, &
importance of the employee’s work. The final di- Kunter, 1985). All VIF values were represented be-
mension, pay, included three items and measured low 1.1, which were within an acceptable range.
Table 4. Enter Multiple Regression Between Work Experience and Job Satisfaction, Career Intention
Dependant Variables
Standardized Beta Coefficient (β)
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001, n/s: not significant
Criterion Variables
Standardized Beta Coefficient (β)
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001, n/s: not significant
There were significant positive relationships be- Hypothesis 4. To test Hypothesis 4, multiple regres-
tween supervisory support (β = .194, p < .001) and sion was conducted with the three career expecta-
work involvement (β = .166, p < .001) and career tion dimensions as the predictor variables and
intention. However, role ambiguity (β = -.114, p < retail career intention as the criterion variable. The
.05) was negatively related to retail career intention. model significantly explained retail career inten-
Students who worked with supportive supervisors tion [F (3,462) = 5.742, p < .001, R2 = .036].
and dedicated coworkers were likely to pursue
retail careers. Students who lacked clarity in terms Students’ expectations of opportunity (β = .163, p <
of job responsibilities were unlikely to seek a retail .001) and success (β = .095, p < .05) were positively
career. In summary, three of the four proposed re- related to career intention. Students who held high
lationships were significant. Therefore, Hypothesis expectations for opportunity and success were like-
2 was supported (see Table 4). ly to pursue retail careers. In total, two of the three
proposed relationships were significant. Hypothesis
Hypothesis 3. To test Hypothesis 3, the three ca- 4 was supported (see Table 5).
reer expectation dimensions were employed as
predictor variables and the four job satisfaction Hypothesis 5. To test Hypothesis 5, multiple regres-
dimensions as criterion variables. The three sion was conducted with the four job satisfaction
regression equation models significantly ex- dimensions as predictor variables and retail career
plained emotional [F (3, 444) = 5.884, p < .001, intention as the criterion variable. The model sig-
R2 = .038], value [F (3, 444) = 6.077, p < .001, R2 = nificantly explained retail career intention [F (4,
.039], and pay satisfaction [F (3,444) = 4.153, p < 443) = 89.131, p < .001, R2 = .446].
.01, R2 = .027].
Emotional (β = .596, p < .001), advancement (β =
Opportunity expectation was related to emotional .276, p < .001), and pay satisfaction (β = .119, p <
(β = .191, p < .001), value (β = .176, p < .001), and .001) were positively related to retail career inten-
pay satisfaction (β = .138, p < .01). Students who tion. Students for whom retail work offered a sense
expect to function as part of a team and to have of accomplishment, opportunities for advance-
leadership and management opportunities in retail ment, and financial incentives were likely to pursue
tend to find retail work satisfying. Only three of the retail careers. In summary, three of the four rela-
12 proposed relationships were significant; thus, tionships were significant. Thus, Hypothesis 5 was
Hypothesis 3 was not supported (see Table 5). supported (see Table 6).
Criterion Variables
Role conflict and role ambiguity led to decreased job
Standardized Beta Coefficient (β) satisfaction. Students who work in retail are in poten-
tially stressful positions requiring them to meet the
Predictor Variables Career intention needs and expectations of customers, managers, and
coworkers simultaneously. Our results support those
Role conflict n/s
Role clarity n/s of other researchers (Babin & Boles, 1996; Behrman
Supervisory support n/s & Perreault, 1984; Brown & Peterson, 1994; Igbaria
Work involvement n/s et al., 1994) indicating that students who experienced
Environment expectation n/s role conflict were not satisfied with pay or advance-
Opportunity expectation n/s ment. Students in boundary-spanning positions may
Success expectation .075* think their pay is inadequate compensation for the
Emotional satisfaction .597*** role conflict inherent in their jobs. Furthermore, stu-
Advancement satisfaction .274*** dents may be unaware of retail career paths that offer
Value satisfaction n/s greater balance in advancement, compensation, and
Pay satisfaction .124***
role conflict.
R Square .457
Adjusted R Square .452 On the other hand, the direction of the relation-
F 89.803***
ship between role conflict and value satisfaction
*p < .05, ***p < .001, n/s: not significant was positive. Some students may view role conflict
as a challenge or an opportunity to use their cre-
ativity and intellect in problem solving. Conse-
Determinants of retail career intention. To deter- quently, they may consider their work more valu-
mine the best predictors of students’ intentions to able when it involves resolving role conflict such
pursue retail careers, stepwise regression was em- as when they must meet the needs of two or more
ployed. Four dimensions of work experience, three groups simultaneously.
dimensions of career expectation, and four dimen-
sions of job satisfaction were used as eleven ante- Role ambiguity was another predicator of job satis-
cedent variables simultaneously, and retail career faction and career intention. Students who clearly
intention was used as the criterion variable. The understood their role(s) in the company reported