Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

HOW TO WRITE THE REVIEW OF REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES (SSAP)

PROCEDURE USING SSAP:

1. SURVEY – READ, READ, READ AND READ THE IDEAS


TO ESTABLISH THE RELEVANCE OF THE MATERIALS TO THE RESEARCH.
2. SYNTHESIS

3. ANALYSIS
-ESTABLISH THE RELEVANCE BETWEEN THE SECOND ELEMENT (SYNTHESIS) AND THE THIRD
ELEMENT (ANALYSIS) AND TRY TO DEVELOP A CONTINIUITY ON THE DISCUSSION

1. Develop a continuity on the discussion


After synthesizing the references (the literature or the studies) to the research you are
conducting, the 3rd element which is the ANALYSIS would fall under the following criteria

FOUR CRITERIA(ANALYSIS)
1. IDENTIFICATION OF GAPS OR THE LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
a) IDENTIFICATION OF GAPS OR THE LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
Relating this with the previous element which is synthesis after going
through the process of synthesizing citing and reflecting all of the
references that you were able to go through in the ANALYSIS stage you are
now to Present an idea wherein you establish areas that were not covered
by the previous reference that you gone through so maybe you identify
something that was not included in the study of this particular person and
you will be able to fill the particular gap or limitation of that study so that’s
what you call identifying the gaps and assuring that in your study this
particular gap would be addressed. In cases where these gaps cannot be
filled in with the research that you are currently writing then part of the
analysis would be the discussion or the presentation of the further studies

b) STATE IF YOUR STUDY WOULD BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THAT GAP OR PROVIDE


ANSWERS TO UNRESOLVED ISSUES
so you would just state in this part of your research that this particular area
that was not covered by your research and the research of other
references could be the subject of further studies and

2. DISCUSSION AND PRESENTAtION OF FURTHER STUDIES


a. Particular and specific areas that were not covered by the research

3. REVIEW AREAS OF CONTROVERSY


another area that you can look into on the part of analysis would be the review
ing the areas of controversy
-there were studies that were conducted but the results of that particular
study was not conclusive therefore quote and un quote controversy by the use
of the term arose and therefore you can further investigate on that particular
controversy that was not answered by that particular research
4. PRESENTATION
a. Organization of references (organization of your ideas)
i. The use of deductive method in developing argument
ii. Develop the coherence and relevance of the discussion
b. dd

4. AND PRESENTATION

The last element in writing RRL will be the presentation.

Establish as writers the organization of your references. Organization does


not just refer to how you arrange the references, it should be in a way that it
reflects the doctype method of writing, so you start form general information
the background ,m you can also include a bit of history and then try to develop
the coherence and relevance of your discussion buy citing another reference
that would slim down the discussion from general to a more specific area it
may be from another country to local discussing the background effect of the
problem that you are writing in you research and then moving on towards the
more specific aarea of your study so it is a paragraph development wherein
you start from a general idea or information and to more specific up to the
point where you reach the specific research problem that you are trying to
present this is what we mean by organization not the literal organization of
your reference but the organization of your ideas