Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Name:
Primary Source: Santiago Alvarez’ Secondary Source: Teodoro
Memoirs of a General Agoncillo’s Revolt of the Masses
When was the account written? The context was set on the time of the The account was written in the
(Context) assembly of the two factions. It was author’s present at that time (1947). It
written years after the Assembly of views the various perspective of
Tejeros by one of the personalities happenings in the Assembly of
that experienced the happenings on Tejeros and the election, it was set to
the said assembly which is Santiago relive the past into the present based
Alvarez. It was set to retell the story of on what did the author searched or
an event in a factual state. known about the event.
Mention of Date/s March 25, 1897 – Assembly was January 1897 – San Francisco de
convened at Tejeros Malabon Town Fiesta
March 26, 1897 – Another meeting January 2, 1897 – Bonifacio wrote a
initiated by Magdalo President letter to his uncle-in-law, Mariano
Baldomero Aguinaldo, but only Alvarez
Magdiwang leaders have attended
March 22, 1897 – Aguinaldo’s
March 27, 1897 – Eyewitness Birthday, Assembly convened at
revealed that a meeting had taken Tejeros
place at the Tanza parish house
April 1897 – Spaniards captured the
town of Malabon
Mention of Place/s Friar estate house in Tejeros – Talisay, Batangas – where Magdalo
venue of the meetings leaders reside
As Andres Bonifacio is
insulted on what happened,
he declares the elections null
and void.
DIFFERENCES between the two It was said that the Tejeros Contrary to the primary source,
accounts Convention happened on March it was said that the Tejeros
25, 1897. Convention occurred on March
The story revolves more on the 22, 1897, which was
election that was made in the Aguinaldo’s Birthday.
Tejeros convention and the The source of Teodoro
aftermath of the Magdalo- Agoncillo tells about the
Magdiwang factions. purpose of why they had a
Trining (Trinidad Rizal, sister of convention.
Jose Rizal) and Josephine Alvarez’s bodyguards stayed
Bracken was present. near the stairs.
Alvarez’s bodyguards are Did not mention Trinidad Rizal
outside the estate house. and Josephine Bracken.
Narrated straightforwardly by Widely narrated by a historian
Alvarez, who is present at the with evidences of the
same story. convention.
YOUR OWN ANALYSIS of the The primary source was more of a It has the same story as the primary
differences between the two accounts focus on the election and explained source but the secondary source was
what was happened in the convention more of a backstory of the election.
of Tejeros. Two accounts have the Dealing on why was the election
same tone although some parts have needed to happen. There was even a
a difference from the secondary sketch of the estate house which
source which is the evidence. Even supports the events that happened
though it lacks evidences, Santiago there. Providing evidences are more
Alvarez, the author alone can be a convincing for the readers to believe
solid proof that the events in the the story.
estate house of Tejeros are
believable.