0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
5K vizualizări7 pagini
The Nassau County District Attorney's Office did a report on the investigation of the 1998 shooting death of Paul Maxwell in Hempstead by on-duty Officer John Zoll.
The Nassau County District Attorney's Office did a report on the investigation of the 1998 shooting death of Paul Maxwell in Hempstead by on-duty Officer John Zoll.
The Nassau County District Attorney's Office did a report on the investigation of the 1998 shooting death of Paul Maxwell in Hempstead by on-duty Officer John Zoll.
oct-29-196 36:32 Deo Pea
1
REPORT BY THE NASSAU COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
ON THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE DEATH OF PAUL MAXWELL
Introduction
On July 24, 1998, twenty eight year old Paul Maxwell was shot to death in the Village
of Hempstead by on-duty Officer John Zoll of the Hempstead Police Department, This Office
has conducted an investigation into that death focusing on the legality of the shooting,
AS part of this investigation, we have engaged in the followi
1, Respond to the scene while the body of the deceased was still present;
2, Review crime scene photographs, videotape and audiotape of police calls;
3. Examine Homicide Squad investigation file including witness statements and notes of
interviews with police officers;
4. Interview pathologist who performed the autopsy and examine autopsy photographs
and diagram;
5, Review prior psychiatric records of deceased from Nassau County Medical Center;
6. Review medical records on involved officerss
7, Interview Police Officer Zoll and Licutenant Oreszezyn;
8. Interview several civilian witnesses who had information pertaining to the event;
9. Review guidelines from the Nassau County and Hempstead Police Departments
concerning use of force on emotionally disturbed persons;
10, Interview specialists with the Nassau County Police Department on dealing with
emotionally disturbed persons;
11, Examine manufacturer's manual on Tasertron weapon (hereinafter referred to a8
“Taser’};
12. Receive lecture and demonstration of this weapon by an instructor at the Nassau
County police firing range;
13. Review report issued by the manufacturer on the operability of the taser uéed in this
case;
Based upon the above, we have concluded that the actions of Officer Zoll which resulted
in the death of Paul Maxwell were justified under the Penal Law. Nor do we find any other
criminality in the manner that the police handled this tragie incident,DeFo P22
Background of the Deceased
Paul Maxwell was a twenty eight year old male who lived in a house at 240
Windsor Parkway, Hempstcad, which is around the corner from the shooting scene. At the
time of his death he was six feet tall and weighed approximately 173 pounds. He had attended
Morehouse College und worked in the insurance aud education fields. Coincidentally, Mr.
Maxwell had been a summer aid in our office in 1988 and was described by his supervisor as
a good worker. He hud no prior criminal record, His parents were divorced when he was a
child and his mother died of cancer in January, 1996. He was living with his mother at the
house on Windsor Parkway at the time of her death and was described as isolated after she
died.
In mid-1996, Paul Maxwell was hospitalized on several occasions at the Nassaut County
Medical Center for psychiatric reasons. On tro of these occasions he was transported to the
hospital by members of the Hempstead Police Department. During his last hospitalization, he
Was releused at his own request by a judge over the hospital’s objection. Although we have
examined the hospital records pertaining to these incidents, they cannot be disclosed in this
report based upon privacy restrictions. Attempts to obtain background information on the
deceased from his father were unsuccessful. He is represented by Thomas Liotti, Esq. who
rejected repeated requests for us to mect with his client.
Interviews with friends of Mr, Maxwell revealed that he had been acting strange for
several days before his death. They described his behavior as erratic and unusual, his speech
as confused and nonsensical and they were concerned to the point of considering calling the
police fo take him to the hospital before he hurt himself, His female roommate was so
frightened by him sitting around naked that she left the house the night before the shooting
and stayed with her mother. One friend who spoke to him on the phone minutes before the
shooting, described him making rambling remarks such as *he was going to leave the house
naked and walk to the medical center, he wanted to be free and he was going to set the house
on fire,” This conversation so concerned the friend that he drove immediately to Mr. Maxwell's
house. When he arrived he smelled a strong odor of gas and observed a fire on the bedroom
rug, Fire personnel who arrived shortly ‘after the shooting found a lamp in the bedroom that
had set the curtains on fire and all the burners and the oven had been turned on with the pilot
lights extinguished. A search of the house failed to reveal the presence of any medication or
illegal drugs.3
Pacts
Shortly after 9:00 AM on July 24, 1998, the Hempstead Police Department recciveil a
call for a naked man in the street at a particular location in the Village. Uniformed officers
were assigned to investigate the complaint. The first officer to arrive was Police Officer Coole,
The location was a residential neighborhood, Officer Cooke observed Paul Maxwell walking
in the roadway carrying a baseball bat in his hand and wearing no clothing. Although Mr.
Maxwell was initially walking away from the patrol ear, he abruptly turned around and ran
back toward the ear with the bat raised over his head. Officer Cooke attempted fo back up but
Mr. Maxwell was quickly at the ear smashing the windshield and bruising the officer's hand
by hitting him with the bat. He was shouting at Officer Cooke: "Do me. Do me." Eventually,
Cooke was able to drive away and request assistance as well as an ambulance and a supervisor
with a “taser.”
The taser gun is a hand held device which simultaneously fires two dart-like projectiles
delivering fifty thousand volts of electricity that will immobilize a dangerous subject and
render him helpless. It holds two cartridges, both containing two darts and each cartridge is
fired sequentially by depressing each side of a button on the top of the device. One dart is
loaded above the other with the top dart pointing horizontal and the bottom dart at a
downward angle. Accordingly, it is not as casy to aim as a pistol. Wires are attached to the
darts which are powered by a rechargeable battery also affixed to the device. The firing
mechanism must remain depressed and both darts in each eartridge must strike and stick to
the target for the electrical charge to be activated.
Hempstead Police Officers Wellington and Murphy heard Officer Cooke's radio call
and responded to the scene in one car. They both observed Maxwell in the middle of the road
with the bat in his hand, When he observed this police car, Maxwell charged at it with the bat,
One officer heard him yell: “My mother just died and if you guys don't want to die, you better
ron.” A civilian witness heard Mr. Maxwell yell at the police: “you caused my mother to die”
As the car proceeded away from Mr. Maxwell, the officers saw him slip on the grass while
chasing them, Eventually they were able to avoid him and drive away. Another civilian witness
observed Mr. Maxwell put the bat between his legs by his genitals and exclaim “this is my
prick.” He also told this same civilian witness as he walked by: Vm not crazy~I'm just ready
for battle, Come with me and wateli what Pm going to do."
Also hearing the original notification and Officer Cooke's request were Lieutenants
Wells and Oreszezya at the Hempstead police station and Police Officer Zoll who was at the
armory preparing for community bicycle patrol. Lieutenant Oreszezyn was in uaiform but
Wells was in plain clothes. They drove to the seene in the same unmarked car. Officer Zoll was
in uniform and drove a marked patrol car. Prior to responding, Lieutenant Oreszezyn took
the taser gun from headquarters, attached the battery and loaded it with two cartridges of
darts, As the Heutenants arrived at the scene, Officer Zoll pulled behind their unmarked car.KIMMIE 28044
Pea
4
When the lieutenants pulled up, Mr. Maxwell was still in the strect holding the bat.
When be became aware of the unmarked car behind him, he turned and ran toward it with
the bat raised over his head. As he approached the drivers® side, he appeared to be trying to
hif the car with the bat. Lieutenant Oreszezyn was aware that Mr. Maxwell had previously
struck Officer Cooke's car with the bat. Licutenant Oreszczyn got out of the ear on the
passenger side and fired one round from the taser over the hood at Mr. Maxwell who was on
the other side of the car. Mr. Maxwell said “that stings" and then proceeded to run around the
front of the car toward Lieutenant Oreszezyn with the bat raised, When he got to about six feet
away, the lieutenant fired the seeand cartridge from the taser and Mr. Maxwell simultaneously
struck him over the head with the bat eausing him to fall to the ground, Lieutenant Wells then
tried {0 manually subdue Mr. Maxwell but he proceeded to strike him on the back and
shoulder with the hat knocking him to the ground as well.
Officer Zoll saw Licutenant Oreszczyn get struck with the bat and kunocked to the
ground. He then saw Mr, Maxwell standing over the licutenant with the bat raised over his
head as if to strike him again, Fearing that the lieutenant would be killed, Officer Zoll fired
his service firearm at Mr. Maxwell who then turned and advauced toward Officer Zoll from
five-six feet away with the bat raised. Fearing for his own life, Officer Zoll fired several more
shots and Mr, Maxwell fell to the ground and dropped the hat, Mr. Maxwell died at the scene
asa result of the wounds he sustained from Officer Zoll’s gun. From the time the taser was
first fired until Officer Zoll had finished shooting wes only a few seconds.
This factual description of the incident is well substantiated from interviews with ten
members of the Hempstead Police Department and written statements from eight civilian
witnesses, Four civilians observed Mr, Maxwell attack Officer Cooke's car with the bat and
break his front windshield. Seven police witnesses and five civilian witnesses observed him hit
Lieutenant Oreszezyn over the head with the bat, Just prior to the shooting, nine police
witnesses and five civilian witnesses saw Mr, Maxwell standing over the fallen lieutenant with
the bat raised as ff (o strike him again, Six police witnesses and three civilian witnesses see him
advance toward Officer Zoll in a menacing manner after the initial shooting which is followed
by several more shuts. One police witness commented that Mr. Maxwell was not aggressive
toward civilians but only to the police. He ohserved rage in Mr. Maxwell's face that he had
never seen before.
‘Onc civilian witness, however, gave a description of the event that is, in part, somewhat
different from accounts provided by the athers. Consistent with the other witnesses, he
described the police cars as “giving Paul bis space." Morcover, he observed Mr. Maxwell
striking two of the officers with the bat, swinging the bat while officers were attempting to
subdue him and while one officer was on the ground. Nevertheless, this witness totd the police
that after the first shot was fired, Mr. Maxwell dropped the bat and the subsequent shots
occurred while he was unarmed but standing, This latter statement is inconsistent with those
of nine other witnesses (police and civilian) and, therefore, lacks reliability. Furthermore, this
witness has an arrest record for disorderly conduct, harassment, resisting arrest (involving theDero Pos
3
Hempstexd Police Department) end criminal contempt. He was released from jail two months
before this incident and rearrested three weeks after this incident for repeatedly threstening
his girlfriend in violation of an order of protection. His credibility is, therefore, signi‘icantly
impaired,
An autopsy was conducted on the body of Mr, Maxwell by Dr. Demartino at the Nassau
County Medical Examiner's Office, From this it was determined that the deceased was struck
hy five bullets, three of which would have caused his death. He was struck by two bullets in
the center of bis chest both of which perforated his heart and lungs. He was struck by another
bullet on the left side of his chest which perforated a lung. He was struck by a fourth bullet in
the right ear which transected his brain and would have killed him virtually instantly. A fifth
bullet struck his right upper arm fracturing the bone, None of the shots were sufficiently close
to leave stippling or gunpowder un the body. The autopsy cannot establish the sequence of the
shots although the one to bis ear and brain would have been one of the last. All of the bullets
were recovered in the body of the deceased. Additionally, five shell casings were recovered at
the scene, all of which were identified by ballistics examination as having been fired from the
gun recovered from Officer Zoll after the shooting. There were no other injurics to Mr.
Maxwell’s body and toxicological tests for drugs and alcohol were negative. Three taser darts
were found embedded in the body; one was in the middle of the chest, one in the penis and one
in the genital area. One additional dart was recovered at the scene.
Analysis,
‘The shooting of Paul Maxwell by Officer Zoll occurred while the latter was performing
his duties and while using his authorized firearm. He fired five rounds, all of which struck Mr.
Maxwell. The main issue to be determined is whether Officer Zoll was legally justified in his
actions at the time of the shooting. Justification pursuant to Article 35 of the Penal Law is
always a complete defense and must be disproved by the prosecution beyond a reasonable
doubt, Pursuant to Section 38.15, Officer Zoll could lawfully use deadly physical force if he
reasonably believed it to be necessary to defend himself or a third person from what he
reasonably believed to be the use or imminent use of deadly physical force. Based upon the
overwhelming evidence, the shooting of Paul Maxwell by Officcr Zoll was justified and,
accordingly, lawful, There does not appear to be any credible factual dispute or investigative
need which requires a grand jury presentation,
Mr. Maxwell, who has a history of mental illness which previously required police
intervention, was acting irrational and dangerous on July 24, 1998. He had eaused a fire in his,
home and was proceeding naked through 2 residential neighborhood in daylight hours with
a baseball bat in his hands. Why he would engage in this conduct is difficult to ascertain
particularly in light of the refusal of his father to speak with us.6
He suddenly began to violently attack the first police ear to respond to a citizen's
complaint and caused injury and property damage. The mere arrival of additioual police cars
only served to further enrage him until he finally attacked an unmarked car with two
occupants. To defend the safety of police personnel and subdue Mr, Maxwell, Lieutenant
Oreszezyn had no choice hut to use force. The taser gun used is a nonlethal method of
subduing a person in this type of situation, Chemical inace could miss the target, incapacitate
other personnel and fs known to be ineffective against some emotionally disturbed persons.
Also, neither licutenant in the unmarked car was in possession of mace,
‘Tragically, the taser was unsuccessful in subduing Mr. Maxwell. There are several
possible reasons for this: missing the body with one of the ¢wo darts in a cartridge; failing to
Keep the trigger mechanism depressed; mechanical malfunction; and profuse sweating by the
target which interferes with the electrical current. Since only three darts stayed on Mr.
Maxwell's body, one shot only caused one dart to stick. Licutenant Oreszeryn specifically
recalls keeping the firing mechanism depressed after the first cartridge was fired. If true, itis
likely that only one dart stuck to the body from the first shot or, that even if both darts stuck,
the sweat produced by Mr, Maxwell’s violent movements on a hot summer morning interfered
with the electrical shock. The manufacturer inspected the taser subsequent to the shooting and
found an overheated oscillator transformer which results from the power being applied for an
extended period of time. This would corroborate Licutenant Oreszezyn’s recollection of
keeping the firing mechanism depressed after the first cartridge was fired. By the time he shot
the second cartridge of darts, the lieutenant was struck over the head rendering him incapable
of keeping the firing mechanism depressed. Therefore, the taser did not transfer any electricity
to Mr. Maxwell from either shot and failed to disable him. We are unable, however, to
determine the precise reason that the taser was ineffective.
Once the taser was ineffective in subduing Mr. Maxwell and he was poised over a prone
and injured policeman with the bat raised in an apparent effort to strike him agaii
Officer Zoll was justified in using deadly physical force by discharging his firearm. When Mr.
Maxwell them turned toward him and advanced forward with the bat raised, Officer Zoll was
again justified in using deadly physical force by discharging his firearm, It must be
remembered that this entire incident developed and escalated in only a few seconds. In their
statements to the police, several civilian witnesses to the incident recognized the necessity of
the action taken by the officer. In these circumstances, Officer Zoll clearly reasonably believed
that the use of deadly physieal force was necessary to defend the lieutenant and himself from
the imminent use of deadly physical force ond there was no opportunity for him to safely
retreat, Accordingly, the shooting was justified pursuant to Section 35.15(2) of the Penal Law.
Since the failure of nonlethal methods to subdue the deceased clearly led to the necessity
of the use of deadly force, it is important to discuss the capability of the Hempstead Police
Department to respond to situations involving emotionally disturbed persons. As a village
police department, should it handle its own emergency situations or should it defer to the
wires possessed by the county police department? The issue revolves around the
greater resoAeO ee
1
conflict between specialized training and shorter response time.
‘The Emergency Services Bureau (ESB) of the Nassau County Police Department, in
addition to participating in rescue efforts, transporting equipment and towing services,
responds to requests to sssist in incidents involving emotionally disturbed persons. They are
specially trained for these assignmnents and have assorted devices (taser, net, water under
pressure, pepper spray) as well as protective gear (helmet, vest, ete.) to deal with the inherent
danger involved. Moreover, they will respond to such calls from the villages and cities in the
County. The drawback, however, to this Bureau’s assistance to a village is response time. They
have two vehicles based in Bellmore and, even ifone were on patrol, depending on the location
of the incident and prevailing traffic conditions, it could take a considerable amount of time
to reach the loestion, Moreover, the Bureau does not always have sufficient on duty personnel
to respond to this type of call and would have to mobilize off duty members at times, further
inapeding response time to a rapidly developing incident. Minimum response time for ESB is
now Gwenty to thirty minutes. Its usefulness is predominantly when the situation is static or
slaw to develop allowing more time to respond and deploy. Given the aggressive manner in
ich Mr. Maxwell repeatedly aitacked the police ears, there was no time for additional
support to respond and the local village officces were forced to deal with this situation by
using the equipment at hand.
Conelusion
‘The deuth of Paul Maxwell was un unfortunate tragedy. It was, however, largely caused
by his irrational und unprovoked violence toward members of the Hempstead Police
Department. Although the police showed appropriate restraint when dealing with this
emotionally disturbed person, the event rapidly cscalated into a situation where deadly
physical force was reasonably required. In the future, itis respectfully sugyested that police
agencies should conduct a comprehensive review of the equipment and procedures they utilize
in dealing with mentally disturbed persons. Different nonlethal devices should be evaluated
and, if deemed effective, scquired. Training in the methods of handling mentally disturbed
persons should be emphasized and all officers should be retrained on a regular basis.
Dated: September 29, 1998
TOTAL Pe?