Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
•
•
IM Eric Tangborn
Tang,born, Eric
The Complete Torrc Attack
-31} 5.Nb<l2 •• ·-·---·· .... _. _____ .,.,••••••• _______ ,., ... _ •••••••••••••••••• ······-······· •• ,____ .._._._3,6
C)after l: l,d4 Nf6 l.ND 1.'6 3.Bp clS 4LJ.....t......... - - .-· .. ·······u·······..............--... ~....43
L . .A) 4..._c5 S:.d Be? ~.Nbd2 Nbd7 7.Bdtl b6 8.().0 .•.__,......................- ..._........43
A1) 8... ..Bb1 t4&&-U4-U_..,u ....J,j,.........,, .........,,.,,,.. ,, .. , •uta~••••nJt u•u••-••• ... . .,.,......, .,, , , ... ..............4S
A2) 8 . . .0 -0 ····- ··-··· .................................···-······ .....-. ........ ·····-·..........,..-.. .··---' 7
~) 4 .•. cS S.c3 Nc6 ................., .................................,...... ",..,,. ,. .••,•.•- .....................____ 48
C) 4...Be7 :S.Nl>c:!.l i)6 .....•... _.__.......• ·~ ... .._ ._.._..... ..... . .- ......- ...... - - ··· -·--·-···· .....................................49
I
Oaplel' 4: :t.d4 NM 1.NI3 c6 3.B&S b' ~···· _........~.........................-·-.. ·-·--·--·- ... - ..SJ.
CIIap&uS: l,d.4 Nlli Z..ND .................. ,..,_.,......."t.Ut-t•,.....-, ............................ ............................ __54..
A) 2 ...b5 .·-·--·-.......................... ·--····-· -· ··-·-·---·----·. ·-·· ........................... ·-· . ·-·-- ·-···-·- ...54.
B) 2 .. .d 6 ...... ··-·-- ·- ·· ·-· --·-··.....................- ............. - ................- ·- ··· ...· ··-·-· ...•...... ._..,.54.
C) 2 .. .c6 .. ...•... ··--·-···-· --......·-·-............·······-·..•.··~·· ............ .- ...---- ····.... .......,... . . ...........55
D) 2 ... .&0.. ··-·-...... ·--··· .................--................ ·--......... ,.................·-·-- ·-······.............................:SS
E) 2....b6 3,Bg.5' tt• ... t•••••-••• ••• •• u ••••n t• tu1tt.,.tttatttt'nrrt•.SS
A•ta Ut iOI H4 .. ftt t »•tu .At tAPI-II.IU t a n • •••• • •• •••
Chapter 8: l .d4 Nf6 Z.Nfl g6 3.8;5 Bg7 4.Nbdl 0-0 S.c3 d6 6 . ~ .......,., ...............70
B) t6,,..b.6 ....................... ··-· .. -·· ·-•.,. ...........o• ............. '""' •• • _ .................... ....... ...... · -· ..... _ .. ...... · ·· - ••••• ••12
C) 6 ....c5 ····-····-···-·-- ···· .. ···-··.... 0..... .--.-·· .............................. 0·-····· ·-· ..............................-13
D) 6 ....Nb<l7 ........... ··········-···-·--·-···-·-74
o . . . . . .. . . . . . . - . . . . .. . . . - · - - · - · · · .... · - · · · · ·· . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Cb 11pCer 9: L d4 Nf6 z;.Nf3 g6 3.8tS Bg7 4.Nbcll d6 .. .... - ...- ·-· .._......- ...-·- ···..........19
A) 5.e4- b6 6.Bh4 ,g5 7.Bg3 Nh5 8.c3 ............................. ........... ... ~......................19
A J) 8 '.J"d7 rtn•r·~ •• · · ·• • • •·~ •• ... • • • • • • • • •••
t 111 ,, l!'t •tf'' t •'!'f• 8() o • • • • • • ••• • • . • . • o • - • • • • • • • • • • • .. . • o .. • • • • . ... . . . . . . . . . • • • •
'I
..
11
able to develop his m inor pieces
Introduction and occupy the center. The Thrre
atiaclc also exposes White to very
Maoy of the top players in the l ittle risk because of the solid
wurld from tne past and present
central p awJ1s on c3r d4-, and e3.
ltnve employed ttJe Torre Attack.
Hence W hite will have little
These players include Petrosiao,
troubJe reaching a playable mid-
K(Jrtchnoi, Timman , Kaspar()V,
SpaS$ky, Keres., Alekbine, Smyslov, dlegame with .a variety of reason-
Brnns.tein, and Yusupov. The non- able plans a t his disposal. This
l'rnfessionat player will also find it book is a compilation of important
very handy. The Torre Attack is a aod recent g.am~~ In many varia-
"c:ry solid a nd easy to learn system. t ions, the pos.itional themes and
White can usually play the first pl~m are of more importance than
~hree moves no matter how Black: actual move order~. The reader
r\:pli=: l.d4, 2.Nf3, 3.Bg5. Sh()u Jd be ~ware O[ key move~ and
plans that both sides .have at the ir
disposal. In the f uture more ad-
vanced database! could lead to a
&rend away from sharp theoretical
openrngs a nd the Torre Attack
would become even more popular.
A q\lo te of Savie lly Tartakower
should be remembered: ••The real
battle begins only in th e mid-
dlegame.'' The middleg.ame is
usually the ba ttle [ie ld where the
game is. decided by unaided skill.
His next few moves wm depead This. D<>ok is intended to nelp the
o n how Black plays, but usually re.ade r reac h a p lay.able mid-
White will strive for this set-up: dlegame position. Great effort was
coneentrated here- to provide the
s:tu(Jeot with a thorough i n1ro-
cluction to this fasc inating opening
s.ystem.
Notatjon
"'" Approllimately equal
+ = White is better
= + Blacl is better
+ - Wbite h:as .a de c~ive advantage
In this opening Wb ite is always ·+ Black has a decisive advantase
...
lU
0xf6 9.Qxd.5 Nc6 (if 9.•.Q:xb2, then
Chapter 1 lO.Rdl Qb4+ ll.c3 Qx.c3 + l2Rd2)
lO.BtA Be7 11.0-0.0 Rd8 12.Rd2
l .d4 N f6 2.Nf3 e6 3.BgS cS 0-0 13.c3 +•, Petrosian-Kozma,
Munich (ol) 1958.
•
a2} 6_.8e7 7.Nxd5 Bb7 (7... 0 ·0
8.Bxf6 Bd6 9.c3 Na6 t0.Qd2 Rb8
ll.Rdl bS t 2.Be2 Nc7 l 3.Nxf6+
Qxf6 14.0 -0 Rb615 .b4 + =, Cher-
nin-Salov. USSR 1983.) 8.Bxf6
Bxf6 9.c3 0·0 (9... Nc6 10.Qc2
NcS? 11.Nxe5 Bxd5 12.0-0 -0 Be6
13. Nxd7 Bxd7 14. Qe4+ Be7
ft 15.Rxd7 Oxd7 16.0xa8+ Bd8
17.0e4+ Be7 18.Bd3 +·, Barlov-
Oster meyer, Biel 1985) 10.Bc4.
We exami ne three moves for See Jllustrative Game 1.
White. b) 5... d6 6.dxe6 (6. Bxf6 Oxf6
A) 4.e3 B) 4.c3 C) 4.e4 7.Nc3 a6 8.Nd2 QdR 9.a4 Be7
10.Be2 0-0 11 .0-0 1Nd7 12.Nc4
A) 4.e3 Nf6 13.e4 Rb8 14.dxe6 fxe 6 IS.e5
With four possibilities for Black: dxe5 l6.Qxd8 Rxd8 17.Nxe5 Bb7
AO 4...b6?! Al) 4... Qb6 AJ) t8.1Rfe 1 + =. Ba rlov- Aodersson,
·L.h6 M) 4...Be7 Haninge 1988) 6... Bx:e6 7.Bb5+
Nbd7 8.Nc3 a6 9.Bxd7+ Bxd7
tO.NuS Be7 I 1.Bxf6 Bxf6
AI) 4 ...M?!
12.Nxf6+ Qxf6 13.Qd5 K c7
A wmmon mistake here, afrer 14.0-0 -0 + ·• Yusupov- Frie$·
whic h White often gains a Nielson, Slden 1979.
•lnrninating position with S.dS!
c) S...b6 6.Bx:f6 Qxf6 7. Nc3 Bb7
(if 7 ... a6, then 8.Na4! exd518...Qd8
9.&:e6 fxe6 IO.NeS or 8 ...eS 9.d6J
9.Qxd5 Ra7 10.0-0~0 Bb? 1t.Qd2
Be7 12.Nc3 0-0 13.Bc4 b5 14.Bd5
+=. Zaichik- Oipslis. USSR 1988.
If 7 ...d6, then 8.Nd2 eS 9.Bb5+
Bd7 10.0 -0 BxbS ll.Nxb5 Qd8
12.f4! a6 [12...ex.f4 13.Qg4) 13.Nc3
N d 7 14.f5 Be7 15.Nce4 Nf6
16. Nxf6 + B.xf6 17 .Q h5 Ke7
18.Ne4+ =. Chemin-Kudrin .
Mendow 1985) 8.e4. See Illustra-
Black has tried the following: tive Came 2.
n) S...cxd5 6.Nc3 d) 5 ... b5!? 6.Nc3 a6 7.a4 b4
al) 6 ...Bb7 7 .N.xd5 Bxd5 8.Bxf6 R.'Ne4 d6 9.Bc4 e5 1O.Qd3 Be7
I
ll.Bxf6 Bxf6 12.N'Xf6+ QKf6 13.e4 N()t 24... Rd6 because o f 2S.bxg6
0 -0 14.Qe3 Nd7 t5.Nd2 Qe7 and if 2.5 ... hxg6, th~n 26.8lCf7!
16.0..0-0 aS 17.b3 N'b6 JS.t'-1 O c7 l5.b3 Rfd8 16.e4 !! l7.Qe3 h&
19.84 Ba6 20.Qd3 Bxc4 21.Nxc4 l8.c4 Re7
Nxc4 22.Qxc4 Qt>7 Draw, Cifuen- Black wanu to play ... Nb6-d7-f6
tes-Speelman, Malta Olympiad to hit the weakness at h5.
1980.
29.Rd3 Nd7
llhrSJTari~
Cam e 1
GM Artur YuSUJ»V
GM Aaatoly ~rpov
Lonch>n matcll/989
A21) S.Qcl
s...Ne-t
!i... Nc6
~•) 6.c3 d5 7.Nbd2 Bd7 (7.•. Be7 After S ... Ne4, White has two
1Uie2 Qc7 9.dxc5 B"e5 10.c4 Be7 w~y~ of retrea ting; Al-21) 6.8f4
11.0-0 0-0 12.a 3 Bd7 l 3.cxd$ and A22l) 6.Bh4
Nxd5 14.Bxe7 N dxe7 l5.Qc5 e5
12. Rac1 b6., 17.Qxe7 1·0, A~lt ) 6.Br4
J(ovacevi c-Podl e&oik, Ljubljana 6... Nc'
7
6...d5 6...d5
a) 7.c3 Bd7 8.Nbd2 Nxd2 9.Qxd2
BbS lO.Bxb.S QxbS 11.Qe2 Qxe2+
1Z.Kxe2 :a, Morovic-Miles, Malta
Olympiad 1980.
b) 7.Bd:3
bl) Dubious is 7...Bd6?! 8.Bxd6
Qxd6 9.c41
b2) 7...Nd7 8.0-0 Bd6 9.Bxd6
Qxd6 t0.c4 o.o ll.Qc2 Ne£6 • ,
Alekhine-Spielmann, Semmering
1926.
b3) 7 ... f5 8.c3 Be7 9.Nbd2 Nc6
lO.h4 0 -0 ll .Ne5 NxeS t2.Bxe.S If 6 ... cJtd4 7.exd4 gS 8.Bd3
Bd7 13.£3 Nd6 14.dxc5 Qxc5 Qa5 +, Kovaeevic recommends
15.Bd4 Qc7 16.£4 + =, Pettosian- 9.c3 Nxc3 10.Nxc3 gxh4 ll .Nxh4
1\cherepkov, USSR 1961. with. advantage to White.
b4) For 7 ... Nc6, see n lustrative 7.c3 Nc6 8.Bd3
Game 5. a) 8.Nbd2 fS 9.Nxe4'1 1 fxe4
7.c3 Be7 tO.Nd2 cxd4 ll .exd4 Bd6 12.Be2
7...d5 0 -0 13.0-0 Bf4 14.8g3 e~
a) 8.Nbd2 Nxd2 9.Qxd2 Be7 15.dxeS Bxg3 16.h:xg3 NxeS = +.
10.Bd3 Bd7 tl.0-0 0 -0 12.dxc5 Petrosian-Ol afsson, Stockholm
Bxc5 13.e4 dxe4 14.Bxe4 Rfd8 .:, 1962.
Alburt-Sosonko, Lucerne Olym· b) 8.Nrd2 f5 9.Nxe4 fxe4 10.Bg3
piad 1982. Bd7 ll.Be2 ReS 12.Qd2 Be7
b) 8.Bd3 Be7 (8.•.Bd7 9.0·0 Rc8 13.0 -0 0-0 14.£4 exf3 tS.BxO
10.Nbd2 f5 , H o rt-Sosonko , BgS • +, Quinteros- Ljubojevic,
Amsterdam 1979. Now Wbito Las Palmas 1974.
could obtain an advantage with 8 ...Bd7
ll .NeS.) 9.h 3 Bd7 10.0-0 fS 8...Bd6 9.Bxe4 dxe4 10.Nfd2 £$
ll.NeS Nxe.S 12.Bxe5 Bf6 13.Bxf6 ll.Nc4 Qc7 t2.Nba3 Be7 13.Nb$
gxf6 14.Bxe4 fxe4 t5.f3 Bb516.Rf2 Qd7 14.Bxe7 Kxe7 1S.dltc5 QdS
+ =, Dreev-Agz.amov, Sevastopol 16.Nbd6 QxcS 17.b4 (17.0-0
1986. NeS •) 17 ... QdS 18.f4 bS
s.Nbcll rs 9.Bel o.o 10.0-o d5 (18...exf3?1 19.e4 fxe4 20.Qf4! and
ll.Ne5 cxd4 ll.exd4 Nxe5 13.Bxe5 Rdl +=, Saidy) 19.083! (19.Nxc8
Bd7 U.Qd Bb5 15.Bxb5 Qxb5 Rhxc8 20.Nd2 Qd3 • + ) 19... blCc4
16.NO Rad 17.Nel Qc4 l8.Ncl3 bS 20.Rdl Qxdt + 2t.Kxdl Rd8 22.bS
19.0 Rxd6+ 23.Kc2 Nd8 24.Rdl Nb?
+ • , Spasslcy-Cbandler, London 25.Rd4 Bd7 26.Rxc4 Ke8 =.
1985. Sb irui-Saidy, USA 1982.
9. Nbdl fS
A2ll) 6.8h4 Lobro n-Kortchooi, Biel 1984,.
8
continued 10.Bg3 N xg3 11.bxg3 finding a safe home for his Kin!·
~11 (better i$ I LBe7) 12.g41 and 16.0-0 b4 17.Nh4 aS 18.Bcl
Wbite stands somewhat bette r. It is important to blockade tbe
passed pawns. Not 18.f4 a4 J9.Qg4
BM-+ .
1/JustratiPe Game 3
GM RongguangYe 18... Bh6 t9.Ba4 Qf4 20.dx~
GM Murray Chandler
Man1/a lrnerzonal 1990 ~. . . . F
Ai
l.d4 N~ 2. 0 e6 3.8g5 c5 4.e3
l
Qb6 5.Nbd2 Qxb2 ,. Bx~ gxf6 00
7.Rbl
Sacrificing another pawn to keep
the Queen sideline!! longer and
h~nce gaining more time.
7 ... Qxa2
I f 7 ... Qc3, then 8 .Bd3 cxd4
li.0-0 dxe3 10.Ne4 ex£'2+ ll.Rxf2
Q c7 l 2. Nx£6+ w ith .an unclear 20 ...fxe6?!
posi tion. Also bad is 20... Qxd2 21.Qh 5
8. c4 0 -0 22.e7 ReS 23. Nf5 B~7
24 . Rf~l Qg5 25.Q h3 followed by
Threatening to trap the Queen.
For example. if 8...cxd4. then 9.Ra 1 Rb3-g3 with a large advantage to
Bb4+ tO.Nfd2. Whirc. Better is 20 ... Qxb4
21.exd7+ Kd8 22.Nb3 Qxe4 23.f3 !
8...Qa4 Be3+ 24.Kh1 Qe7 25.Re l with an
T he only move. If 8... Qa6, then unclear position.
9.d51 exd5 l O.QxdS Qc6 1 J.Qh5
with "s'arge advantage to White. 21.Qh5 + Kd8 22.Ndf3! 818?!
Better is 22... R g8 23.Rbd1 Rg7!
9.dS bS! 24.0xc~ Bxe4 wirb ao unclear posi·
lf 9 ...exd5, then JO.QxdS Qxc2 tlo n. After the text Black's pieces
li.Bd3 Qc3 + 12.Nfd2 is 1trong. are disorganized and his position
IO. Ncd2 falls nport.
No t JO.Rxb5 Ba6! I t.Nb2 Qe4 23.Rbdl!
12. R b3 Qxd5 with a large ad- 23 .Ng6 hxg6 2 4.Qxh8 Ke7
vantage to Black. (24... Kd8 25.Qg8) 25.Qil7 + Kd8 is
IO ... a6 ll .RaJ Qb4 12.c4! Bb7 less clear.
Black is finally able to start 23...Bxe4 l4.Qn Ra7
developi ng some of his pieces. But There is no· defense. If 24 ... Bd6,
his Queen is still in a bad position. then 25.g3. Or if 24... Be: 7 2.5.Qxe6.
13. e4 Bg7 14.Rbl QaS JS.Bd3 O r if24... Kc7 25.Bxd7.
Qc7 25.g3!
The Queen is finally able to O nce again forcing the Q ueen
rt:tu rn, but Black's problem now is into an awkwa rd posi tion on the
9
side of tbe board.
2S...Qh6 26.Qxe6 Bx£3 27.Nx0
Rt7 28.Rtel Bg7 29.Qb6 Kc8
30.Re7 Rd8 3l.Nb4 IS 32.Qxa5
Bt8 33.Nd5 ! Qa6 34.Nd6+
Qxd6 J5.Rxd6 Bxe7 36. Rb6
Rb7 37.Rh6 b3 38.Rb6 b2
39.Rxb7 Kxb7 40.Qb5 + Kc7
4l . Qxb2 Nt6 42 .Qg7 Bf8
43.Qxh7 NeS 44.Bb5 Bd6 45.f4
Nf3+ 46.Kg2 Nd4 47.Ba4 Ne6
48 . b4 Nrs 49.Q~4 Ne6 so.rs 17.Nd6 b4 18.Rb3
Nd4 Sl.bS Rb8 52.Bb5 NxbS Better is J8.b3. White will have
53.cxbS R x bS 54.h6 Rb2 + trouble with the Black pawn on h3
55.Kh3 Rb4 56.Qe8 Rb8 later o n.
57.Qxb8 Kxb8 58.1"6 l-0 18... h3 19.g3 RhS 20.Rd3 QaS
21 .c:3
Ex.c banging Queens wo uld ease
Illustrative Game 4 the pressure o n Black.
GM Joel Benjamin 21 ...Rb8 2l.Qb2 Rc5 23.Nn8
GM Leonid YudasiD If 23.Bfl , then 23 ...rs.
New Yorlc 1990
23.- RbS??
Wit h t his zwischenzug Black
l.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6 3.8g5 cS 4.e3
seems to stay a pawn a head. How-
Qb6 S.Nbd2 Qxb2 6.Bd3 Qd
ever, there is a simple reply. Bet·
7.0-0 d5 8.8xf6 gxf6 9.dxc5 ter is 23 ... Rxc8, altho ugh after
Bc7 IO.Rbl QxcS ll.e4 24.Qxb7 Rb8 25.Qd7 Rxc:3 26.Rxc3
White must open up the position Qxc3 27. Nd4 White has the ad-
before Blac k completes his vantage.
development. 24.Qc:Z.??
ll ... dxe4 U .N xe4 Qc7 But White also misses it :
13.8b5 + Kf'8 24.Qa3 +! Then o t' cnu rse not
If 13 ... Nc6, the n 14.Qd4 is 24... Qxa3? 2S.Rd8+ mating. But
su ong. White is just a piece up after other
moves.
J4.Qd2 a6 15.Be2 Nc6 16.Rfdl
24•••Rxc8
hS
Now White hu inadequa te: com-
Blaclc is having tro uble develop- pensation for the sacrificed pawn.
ing bis pieces. Therefore be ad-
vances his h· pawn to free bis 2S.Rd7 Rb6 l6.Qh7?!
King's Rook and also t rie$ to cre- White tries tn get the h1 tho rn,
ate a weakness o n White's but now his Queen 1$ nut of play.
kingside. 26...Rb2 27.Kn Rdl 28.Rxd8 +
10
•
A3) 4...h6
5.Bh4
5.Bxf6 Qxf6 6.c4!? cxd4 7.exd4
Bb4+ 8.Nbd2 b6 9. Be2 Bb7
J0.0-0 0 ·0 l l.NeS Bxd2 12.Qxd2
d6 13.Ng4 Qg6 14.Ne3 Nc6 15.(4
Ne7 16.d5?! (16.Bd3 +=)
40...Qxc2 4l.b4! J6 ... exd5 l 7.f5 QgS =.
Torre-
The only move. 4t.Qxf7? Qe4+, Cebalo. Novi Sad 1984.
4l.Ra8 Rb7!, and 41.Qxd5 Rxb2 all
lose.
4l ••.Qe4 + 42.Ke2 R1b7?
Losing bis advantage. Correct i$
42...Rbf81 43.Qg6 c3.
43.Qg6 Qd3 + 44.Kf3 c3
Black could have forced a per-
petual check wi th 44 ... Qc4+
45.Ke2 Qc2 +.
4S.Ra6! Qe4 +
Unclear is 45 ... c2 46. R c6
(46.Re6 Qdl+ 47.Kf4 Rg8 48.Re8
immedi ately forces a draw) s...Be7
46 ... Ra8! 47.Re6! Qe4 + 48.Kf2 a) 5... b6 6.c3 Be 7 7 .Nbd2 0 -0
(not 48. Ke2? c l=N+I - + ) 8.e4 cxd4 9.cxd4 d5 10.Bxf6 Bxf6
48...Qb4+ 49.Kf3. ll.e5 Be7 12.BbS Ba6 13.a4 Bb7
46.Ke2 Qh4?! 14.0-0 a6 15.Bd3 Nc6 16.Rel Bb4
This was Black's last chance to 17. Re3 Na5 ,., Yusupov-Be li-
for ce a perpetual check with avsky, Linares 1993.
46...Qc2+. b) S ... Qb6 6.Qc1 cxd4 7.Bxf6
47.Rt6 Qd8? !:)tf6 8.exd4 dS 9.Be2 Nc6 1O.c3 e5
A time tro u ble e rro r . Now J 1.0-0 12.Na3 R c8 13.Nc2 h5
White o nce again has a large ad - =+, Spassky- Schmittdiel, Ge rman
vantage. League 1989.
u
•
5. bd2
Another idea is 5.dxc5.
a) 5... Bxc5
al) 6.Be2 Be7 7.c4 b6 8.Nc3 Bb7
9.0 -0 0 -0 tO.Qc2 Na6 tl.Radl
NcS 12.R d4 + =, Horc-Adorjan,
~uio Emilia 1984/85.
a2) 6.c4 Bb4+ 7.Nbd2 b6 8.Bd3
lO.Qel NhS?I Nc6 9.0-0 Be7 IO.Rc l Bb7
Better is 1O... Nbd7 11.0-0 -0 l i.Qe2 0-0 12.Rfd l Qc7 13.8£4
Nd5 12.Bxe7 Qxe7 13.g3 Rc8 ~. d 6 14.h3 Rac8 15.o3 R fd8 •,
ll.Bxe7 Qxc7 11 .g31 Nf6 Yusupov- Karpov, Londo n 1989.
13.0-0-0 Nbd7 14.RheJ 0-0 b) 5 ... Na6 6.Bxa6 Qa5 + 7.Nbd2
IS.Kbl a6 16.KaJ bS 17.8 b l Rfc8 bxa6 8.c6 d6 9.c4 Qc7 lO.Qa4 Rb8
18.N h4 dS 19.f4 b4 20.c4 dxc4 ll.c:5 dxc5 12.Bf4 Bd6 13.Bxd6
2l .Nxc4 BdS 2l.Ne3 Qd6 2JJ~xdS Qxd6 l4.Nc4 Qc7 15.Nfe5 Draw,
13
Yusupov-Hubner, Baden-Baden
1992.
c) A new move i~ 5 ...Qa5+ . See
Illustrative Game 6.
s...w
a) For 5... 0-0, see Illustrative
Game7.
b) 5...cxd4 6.cxd4 b6 7.a4 N'c6
8.c3 0-0 9.Bd3 Nd5 10.Bxe7 Qxe7
11.0-0 Nf4 12.Bb5 a6 13.Bxc6
dxc6 J4.Ne5 f6 15.Nec4 Bb7
l 6.Qg4 g5 17.Nxb6 Rad8 IS.Rfel We will now break the line into
cS 19.d5 b5 unclear, Hodgso n- ' 'ariations with ...h6, A41) 7...M .
Motwani, London 1988. and without ... h6, A42) 7 ...Nc6 aod
6.Bd3 A43) 7 ...cxd4.
6.dxc5 bxc5 7.e4 Nc6 8.Bb5 Bb7
9.0 -0 0-0 10.e5 Nd 5 11.Bxe7 A4l) 7••• h6
NcJCe7 12.c4 Nb6 13. Ba4 Nxa4 8.8h4 Nc6
14.Qxa4 Ng6 wi th a good posi tion a) 8...d6
for Black, Utasi-Adorjan. Sarajevo al ) 9.Qe2 Nbd7 10. e4 (10.0-0
1984. 0-0 ll .Rad l Qc7 12.Rfel Rfe8
6...Bb7 J3.h3 e5 unclear, Janowsky-Aiek-
a) Attem pting to exchange hine, Mannheim 1914) tO... N"hS
ll.Bxe7 Qxe7 12.g3 0 -0 13.Nh4?'
Bishops with 6...Ba6 is worth con- Nf4! 14.gxf4 Qxh4 ""+, Petrosian-
sidering. Beliavsky- Dolmatov, Reschko, Leningrad 1967.
USSR Championship 1986, con- a2) 9.0-0 0-0 tO. Ret cxd4
tinued 7.c4 cxd4 8.Nxd4 Bb7 9.0~ 11.e.xd4 Nbd7 12.a4 a6 13.b4 Nd5
0 -0 10.Qe 2 d6 ll.Rac l Nbd7 14.Bxe7 Qxe7 1S.Qb3 a5 16.b5
12.Rfd l a6 =. Rac8 17.Racl Rc7 18.Be4 N7f6
b) After 6 ...cxd4, Salov-Cebalo. 19.Bbt Rfc8 20.c4 + =.
Larsen-
Leningrad 1984, continued 7.exd4 Andersson, Biellnterw nal 1976.
Ba6 8.Bxf6 Bxf6 9.Ne4 Be7 IO.dS b) For 8... 0-0, see IlluStrat ive
exdS ll.Bxa6 Nxa6 12.Qxd5 Nc7 GameS.
13.Nd 6 + Bxd6 14.Qxd6 Qe7+ 9.dxc5 bxcS 1o.e4
15.Qxe7+ Kxe7 16.0· 0 -0 +=. Hort-Makarichev, O slo 1984
7.c3 conti nued l O... d6 11.0-0 0-0
7.0-0 cxd4 8.exd4 NdS 9.Bxe7 J2.a3 ReS 13.h3 Nh5 14.Bxe7 Qxe7
Qxe7 lO.Rel 0 -0 tl .a4 Nc6 l 2.c3 15.Re1 Nf4 t6.Bft Rfd8J7.b4 +•.
fS J3.Nc4 Na5 14.Ne3 Qf61S.Nxd5
Bxd5 16.b4 Nc6 17.Bfl d6 18.aS A42) 7.- Nc6
Draw, Walther-Siklos, 8th World 8.0-0
Correspondence C hampionship. For 8.a3, see Illustrative Game 9.
14
8•.•0·0 20.Qxd 5 + + =, Episb io-smirio,
8 ... h6 9.Bh4 g5!? 10.Bg3 h5t? Viloius 1988.
11.Nxg5 b4 J2.BeS uncle ar, c) 9.Rel Rc8 lO.Rcl Nb5 ll.Ne4
Kraseo kov- Velimirovic, Kusadasi f6 12.Bh4 g6 13.a3 c4 14.Bc2 Na5
1990. J5.Ned2 f S = , Balasbov- Miles,
Novi Sad 1975.
d) 9.dxc5 bxc5 JO.e4 d6 1J.Qe2
Rb8 12.Radl Nh5 13.Be3 g6 =,
Kan-Keres, USSR Championship
1952.
9~.. NdS
a) 9•..d6 JO.e4 Clld4 11.Nxd4 Ne5
12. Ba6 Bxa6 13.Qu6 Qc8 ;;,
Pet rosian- Averbakb. Moscow
1950.
b) 9...cxd4 IO.exd4 Nrd5 l l.Bxe7
Ncxe7 12.g3 Nf6 13.Ba6 Qc8
9.Qel 14. Bxb7 Oxb7 =. Spasslcy-
Andersson, Clermnnt - Ferrand
a) Ineffective was 9.e4 cxd4 in
1989.
the following games:
l0.8xe7 Qxe7
al) JO.cxd4 b6! l l.Bxf6? (ll.Bh4
Nb5= ) 1 l...Bllf6 l2.e5 Be7 1J.a3 lO... Ncxe7 ll.g3 £5 12.e4 fxe4
d6 14.Be4 b5 =+, Barlov- Adorjao, 13.Bxe4 Rb8 14. Rae l unclear,
New York 1985. Rechlis-0 . Gurevich, Jerusalem
198(;.
a2) 10.Nxd4 d.S ll .Nxc6 B)(c6
12.e5 Ne4 13.Bxe7 Q xe7 J4.Nf3 f6 l t.Ba6 Bxn6 12.Qxa6 Nc7
15.Qe2 Bb7 16.exf6 Qxf6 J7.Rae.l 13.Qe2 dS
Rfd8 =, Yusupov-Hmad i. Tunis With equ ality, Marshaii-
Interz.onal 1985. Capablaoca, Bad IGssiogen 1928.
b ) 9.a3
bl) 9 ... cxd4 t O.exd4 NdS l l.Bxe7 A43) 7...(Xd4
Ncxe7 12.Rel f5 13.c4 Nf4 14.Bf l 1... 0·0 will usually transpose
Rf6 15.Qb3 Rb6 16.R adl gS 17.d5 into the o ther lines ex:amined, al·
g4 t 8.Nd4 Neg6 19.dxe6 dxe6 though White could try to take ad-
20.Nxe6 Nxe6 2J.Rxe-6 Qh4 22.h3 vantage of early castJing:
RdM 23.c5 Bd5 24.Bc4 Bxe6 a) 8.h4!'1 d6 9.Bxf6 B'd6 10.Ne4
25.Bxe6+ K g1 26.c6 and White cxd4 1 t.cxd4 Nc6 t2.Nfg5 g6 13.a3
prevailed io the complications in Bg7 l4.Nxh7 +·, Z. Nikolic-P.
Hodgson-Ko~tcn , London 1988. Nikolic, Yugoslavia Championship
b2) 9...h6 t O.Bh4 cxd4 J t.e xd4 1981.
NbS (11...Nd5 12.BgJ. d6 unclear) b) 8.Q c2 h6 9.b4!? cxd4 10.cxd4
12.Bg3 {5 13.d5 exd5 14.Nb3 £4 Nc6 ll.Bxf6 Bxf6 12.Ne4 Be7
15.Bg6 Nxg3 16.fxg 3 fxg3 J'7.Bc2 13.Q e2 CS l4.Ned2 R eS 15.Ba6
gxh2+ l S.Khl Rf6 19.Qd3 g6 Bxa6 16.Q xa6 Bf6 J7 .Nb3 Q c7
15
18.Qe2 Rce8 =, Hulak-Spassov, c) 8...Nd5
Plovdiv 1983. c l ) 9.Bxe7 Qxe7 JO.g3 B a6
8.exd4 l l.Bu6 Nxa6 12.Qe2 Nac713.NeS
8.cxd4 d6 14.Nd3 0.0 15.f4 b5 =, Kamslcy-
a) 8 ... Nc6 9.a3 0-0 10.0-0 Nd5 Sax, Manila lntefzonal 1990.
ll .Bxe7 c2) 9. Ne4 0-0 10.Bxe7 Qxe7
at) J L..Qxe7 12.Qe2 Rac8 11.Qd 2 f5 12.Ng3 Qd6 13.Ne5 Nc6
l3.Rac1 Nb8 14.Rfe l f5 l5.Qfl 14.Nc4? ! Q c7 15.Ne2 Rfti = +,
Nf616.Rxc8+ Rxc8 17.Rc1 Qf8 ... , Klaric-Rashkovsky, Sochi 1977.
Hort- Larsen, Lioares 1983.
a2) 1 t. .. Ncxe7 12.R c 1 ReS
13.Qe2 Rxcl 14.Rxc1 Q b8 15.Ne5
Nf6 16.Ng4 Nxg4 17.Qxg4 f5
18. Qg3 QxgJ 19.hxg3 + = , Es-
tevez.-Lebredo. Cuba 1984.
b) 8... Nd5
bl ) 9.Nc4 0-0 {9... Bxg5
10.Nd6+) 10.h4 f5 (10...f6 11.Qb1)
1t.a3 Nf6 =. Spass ky-Po rtisch ,
Geneva match 1977.
b2) 9.Bxe7 Qxe7 10.0-0 CS
ll.Ret 0 -0 12e4 Nf4 13.Bfl fxe4 9.0-0
J4.Nxe4 Nc6 1.5.g3 Nd.S J6.Bg2 9.Nc4 Qc7 10.Qe2 Nbd7 11.0· 0
+ ... , Timman-Andersson, 1984. 0 ·0 l 2.Rfe1 Rfe8 t3.Rad t Nf8
8. ..d6 14.Bc1 Nd5 16.Ng5?1 b5 17.Na3 b4
a) Again, castling could be =
18.cxb4 Nxb4 +, Torre~Lasker,
premature: 8 ...0 ·0 Moscow 1925.
a 1) For 9.h4, see Jllustrative 9 ... Nbd7
Game 10. 9... 0 -0 lO.Re 1 Nc6 11.a4 Nd5
a2) Less aggressive is 9.0-0 Nc6 12.Bl(e7 Ncxe7 13.a5 bxa5 14.Qa4
lO.Rel Nd5 l l.Bxe7 Ncxe7 ·t 2.a4 Nf4 15.Be4 d5 16.Bbl Nc6 17.Qc2
a6 13.(.) Nf6 14.Qe2 Q c7 I5.Ne4 g6 18.Nb3 Rb8 19.Nc5 Bc8 20.Q d2
Nxe4 16.Bxe4 NdS 17.Nc:5 Nf6 Nh5 2l.Ra2 += with the idea Qh6,
18.Bf3 d6 19.Nd3 Bxf3 20.Qxf3 d5 Ng5, g4, h4, Spassky- Beliavsky.
21.Ra3 Ne4 22.Qe2 Nd6 23.Ne5 Mo ntpellier 1985.
Draw, Kovacevic-Lalic, Sarajevo IO.Rel 0-0 ll.a4
1988. ll.Qe2 Re8 12.Nfl h613.Bd2
b) 8 ... Nc6 9.0-0 0 -0 lO.Rel Bf8 14.Ng3 transposes to Illustr a-
Nd5 J l.Bxe7 Ncxe7 l2.Bf1 £5 1 tive Game 11.
(better are 12 ... d6 , I 2 ... Ng6, or Jt. ..a6
12 ... Rc8) 13.c4 Nf6 14. b4 Ne4 I I. .. NdS 12.Bxe7 Qxe7 13.a5
15.Qb3 KhS?! l 6.Radl Ng8 17.d5 N7f6 14.Qb3 Qc7 15.Qa3 Ra b8
+-, Balashov-Lebredo, Cienfue- 16.Bfl b5 17.Bxb5 Nxc3 led to a
gos 1975. simplified posit ion , Timman-
16
•
after 13.Bxe7 Nxe7 14. Re l N£4 pawns. This h-pawo will late r play
15.Bfl Qd7. a decisive role. Black now plans to
13.••Nb8 march his King to e5.
Not 13 ... Bxb4? 14.dxc6 Bxc6
t 5.N d4 Nf4 16.Nxc6 QgS t 7.g3
Nxd3 18.Nf3 winning.
14. Bxe 7 Qu7 1 S.dxe6 rxe6
16.e5 Nd7!'!
Black accepts a weakened pawn
structure in exchange for active
pieces. Wbite would have a slight
advantage after 16...Bxf3 17.NxD
d5 18.Rcl.
17 . exd6 Qxd6 18.Be4 BdS
19.N c4 QcS lO . BxdS udS
21.Ne3 Ndf6ll.Rcl'!! 49.Kel
Better is 22.Qd4 Rae8 2J.RadJ. Accordin~
to Ourevich, also
lo,iog are 49.b6 Nxb6 50.K e3
22•.•Qd6 23.N d4 Nd51 + 5l.Nxd5 a2 and 49.Na2 Kg8
It was still better to play 23.Qd4.
50.b6 Nxb6 5l.Ke3 Nc4+ 52.Kxd3
23 ... Rac8 24.&3 Qd7 lS.K&2 Nd6 S3.f6 gxf6 54.gxf6 Nf5 55.Kc3
ReS 26.Qd3 Ng4 27.Nxg4 Nxh4 S6. Nb4 Nf3 S7. Nd5 b 4
No t 27.Rce1 ? Nxh21 28.Kxb2 58.Nf4 K f7 59.Kb3 Kxf6 60.Ka3
Nf4 1 28.gxf4 R hS+ 30.Kgl Qh3 Kf5 6t.Nh3 K g4 62.Nf2 Kg3
. .
wanmng. 63.Ne4+ Kg2 64.Nf6 b3 6S.Ng4
27 ... QJ(g4 28.Khl Nf6 29.Nc6! NeS.
Re6 49... K&8 SO.Kdl
No t 29 ... Rh 5 30.Ne7+ K£7 Or SO.b6 Nxb6 S l.Kd2 NdS!
3J.Rc7. S2.Na2 Nf4 winning.
30.f4?! SO ... Kn Sl.Kcl Kt7 SZ.Kbl
Better is 30.0 Qh5 3l.Nd4 ReS S2.b6 still does not work due to
with an u nclear position. Now Black S2 ... Nxb6 53.Kd2 Kd6 54.Kxd3
is able to get into an endgame which NdS SS.Na2 Nf4 S6.Kc3 Ng2.
is ravorable because be gets a Rook A fterr the text, 53. Nxd3 is
on the second rank. threatened.
30...Qe2! 3l.Qn2 Rxel 32.Rfel S2 ... dl S3.Kcl Kd6 S4.b6 Nxb6
Rh8 33.Ru2 Rxe2 3 4 . Ne5 SS.Kxdl Nd5 56.Ncl al. 57.Nal
Rxb1. 35.Rc8 + Kh7 36.(5 Rn O r 57.Kcl Ne3 ! 58.Na 1 Nx£5
37.&4 Rel 38.Ng6 ReS 39.Rxe8 winning.
Nxe8 40.Kg2 Nd6 4l .Ne7 Nc4 57... Ke5 58.!6 gxf6 59.gxf6 Kxf6
4l.a4 d4 43.Kf2 d 3 44.h4 aS! 60.Kc1. KtS 6l.Kb3
45.&5 b5 46.axbS a4 47.NdS a3 If 61.Kb2, then 61...Kg4 62.Nb3
48.Nb4 hS! Kxh4 63.Nc5 Kg4 6 4.Ne4 h4
Black needs to avoid exchanging 65.~a2 Nc3+! 66.Nxc3 h3 67.Ne4
19
h2 68.Nf2+ Kf3 winning. _Witb such an advantagei'!_!Qace,
61...Kg4 62.Ka2 Kxh4 63.Nb3 it is better not to e:cchan gc:_pi~ces:
Kg4 64.N cS b4 65.Ne4 Nc3 + ·Bmer was - 15.0·0 R c3 l~. Q e2
'Qbll 17.Rfd l Rfc8 18.Nfll fo l-
66. xc3 h3 0-1 lowed by Bd2. --
l4...Nh5 16.0· 0 Rxcl 17.Q"cl
Illustrative Game 9
s~asser ~irawaif'l
"M Ulf Andersson .)
\ . __./' SlceUaftt.a 1989
" Not 17 ... Nf4 18.Bxf4 ex£4
19.Nd4 eyeing the weakness at c6.
18 .Q c2 Qb8 l9 .Qa4 Rd8
20.Rd?!
l.d4 Nf6 2.Nt3 ~ 3.BgS cS 4.e3 Again it is better oo t to ex-
Be7 S.Nbd2 b6 6.c3 8b7 7.Bd3 change Rooks. White could have
Nc6 8.a3 kept a bi g advantage with 20.Bb5
White wants to play e4 without Nf8 2l .Bc6 f5 22.Bb6 Nf6 23.Ng5.
wo rrying about ....cxd4 and ...Nb4.
20...Rc8 2l.Rxc8+ Bxc8 l2.g4
8 ...0-0?! Better is 22 .Qc2 fo llowed by
· Allowing W hite to create a queenside expansion with a3-a4.
strong ceoter. Better is 8...Nd5.
n ...Ng7
9.e4 d6 Not 22... Nf4 23.Bxf4 exf4
According to Seirawan, 9... Nh.5 24.Nd4 and now 24.•.Ne5 loses a
can be met with 10.Be3l f5 l l.exf5 piece to 2S.Qe8+ B£8 26.Ba6.
exf.S 12.d5 Na5 (if 12 ...f4, then
13.dxc6 Bxc6 14. Ne5 +· o r
23.Ba6
13... fxe3 14.exb7 exd2+ 15.Nxd2
T his leads to an exchange of
Queens. However, Wh ite bas no
+ ·) 13.Qc2 £41? (if 13_.g6, then
advantage in the e ndgame.
14.Bh6 Re8 15.0-0 Bxd5 16.Bxf5
Bxf3 17.Nxf3 gxfS l S.QxfS Ng7 23 . .. 8xa6 24.Qxd7 Qb7
19.Q d5+ with a strong attack) 25.Qxb7 B:xb7 26.Nel
14.Bxh7 + K.h8 1S.Ne5 fxe3 (not This Knight would like to go to
IS... Nf6 16.Ng6+ I<xb7 17.Nxe7 + c6. This move abo allows White to
+·) 16.Ng6+ Kxh7 17.Nxf8+ Kg8 secure his p awn chain with £3.
18.Q b7+ Kx £8 19.Qh8+ Kf7 26.- fS 27.f3 hS?
20.Qxh5+ Kg8 21.fxe3 unclear. A fatal error. Now White is able
10.b3 to maneuvcr his Knight to c6. Cor·
In order to meet JO... h6 wi th re et is 27 ... B a6 28.a4 Be2!
l l.Be3 and not have to wo r ry t hreatening ...Bdl.
about ... Ng4. 28.gxf5 gxfS l9.b5
lO.••cxd4 11.cxd4 e5 12.d5 Nb8 Nel -c2-b4-c6 will be decisive.
13.Be3 l9••. Ne8 30.Ncl Bh4 3l.Bt2 BgS
Meeting the threat of 13.-NxdS. 32.Nc4 Kr7 33.Nb4 fXe4 34.fXe4
White's advantage is from his greatet Ke7 3S.Kg2 Kd7 36.a4 K c7
control of space and the hole at c6. 37.Nc6 Bxc6 38.dxc6 Nf6 39.a5
13 ... Nbd7 l4.b4 Rc8 IS.RcJ ?! bxaS 40.Bxa7 Nxe4 41.Nxa5 1-0
20
Black cannot stop the b.pawn. 16.dS! Kc8
If 1S... Na6, then 16.Bu6 Bxa6
l 7.QaJ wins a pieoe.
/UustraJive Gam4 10
CM Vlado.KovaCiVIc \. 17.Q'b4 Nf7
IM Dragoljab Minic ' On 17... Qc7, Kovacevic gives tbe
/(Qrf()VQC 1977 following variation: 18.Qb4 Rn
19. Ne5 R g7 20. Nxg6! bxg6
l .d4 ri l .NO Nffi J.BgS c5 4.t3 2t.Qh8 + K£7 22. Re7+ K.xe7
Bt7 S.Nbdl b6 6.c3 Bb7 7.Bd3 23.0xg7+ N£7 24.Rel +.
cxd4 8.exd4 0-0? J8.QM h6
It is very risky to castle in this If 18. .. b5, then 19.Bxf51
variation before White has done so 19.Regl BxdS 20.Qd4 l-0
as well. Better is 8 ...d6.
9.b4! Ne8?
/IIILSYQJ{.... Oamt 11
Better is 9... d6, altho ugh White
has a big advantage after 10.Blff61 IM Carsten Hoi
Bxf6 11.Qc2! ( not 1 l.Bxb7+ ? GM Boris Gulko
Kxh7 12.Ng!5 + Kh6! 13. 0g4 e.S -+) Thes.salor~iki Olymp/4d 1988
1l...g6 {1L .h6 12.g4) 12.h!5 Qe8. Anno tated by GM! Yasscr
The idea o f the text mo,·e is to Seirawan.
close the bl -b7 diagonal with ... CS.
l .d-4 t6 2.NO c5 3.e3 Nr6 4.Bd3
JO.g4! fS ll.pfS txlS U.QbJ + b6 S.0-0 Bb 7 6.Nbd2 cxd4
Kh8 7.e.xd4 Bc7 8. Rel 0-0 9.c3 d6
If J2. ..d5, then 13.0·0.0 Nd6
JO.Qel Re8 1 J.N U Nbd7
14.Rdel Ne4? 15.Bxe4 fxe4
16.Rxe4 + -. 12..Ng3 Bf8
Black has an excellent defensive
13.0·0·0 Nd6 14.Rdel Bxg5 setup. He is now preparing to
Black had oo choice but to o~n break with ...e6-e5. Afterwards,
the h·file. If 14... Bf6, then IS.Qa3. h is o nly concern would be t he
lS.hxgS g6 potential weakness of t he £5
If 1S... Nc6, then 16.N h4. square.
13.Bg5 h6 !?
This move doesn't fit imwith the
plan of ...e6-e5. so Black deddes
on another course. I prefer ... Qc7
fo llowed by ... g7-g6, ... Bg7 and
... e6-e5. Still, this is all a matter of
taste.
14.Bd2 Qc7 lS.BcU!
White is floundering without a
phm. A normal course wo uld be to
press matters on the q ueenside
with 15. Ba6 and a2-a4-a5. Like the
21
text, this plan would step out of the Suddenly Blade is in big trouble.
...e6-e5-e4 hit. White has two screaming Bishops
tS...BdS and the open g-file. Boris tries to
Black immediately tries to take force White's hand witb a provoca-
advantage of the weakening of c4. tive defense.
The deployment of the Bisho p on 23...NhS
dS is very provocative and gives The purpo$e of this move is to
White a plan. Perhaps the modest play ...f7-fS as quickJy as possible.
15 ...Bc6 preparing ...b6-b5, secur- l4.R,g1 Kf'8
ing dS for the Knight, was better. Black is convinced that 24._£5
t6.b3 Qb7 17.Nh4 bS 18.Qd3 25.Bxh6 quickly torches his King.
with ...c6-e5 and ... Nf4, or continue Wbat horrible irony to be mated
as in the game. If 2Le5 28.Nxd6, by a Rook supported by the Bishop
""; th the threats of Qh7 mate and Nxf7 which made such a strange retreat
mate, is immediate ly decisive. It o n move fifteen.
should also be noted that these l1'l()Ve<i
had takcu a toll o o White's doclc.
.
B ) .f.cl
2 7...fS 28.Qe3 + f4
The retreat 28... Kh7 is met by
tbe brutal 29.Qg.5 and if 29- .Ng3+
30.fxg3 h3, crying to keep the g-file
closed , 31.g4 and , to quote
Kortchnoi, " Black experie nces un-
pleasant sensatio ns."
8111) 6.Nc3
And now Black has played
811 tt) fi ...a6 and BllU) 6...Nd7.
Bu u ) ' · ·a'
a) Worth consideTing is 6... a6
7.e5 Qd8 8.Bd3 d5 9.Ne2 cS 10.c3.
a 1) 10...Nc6 11.0-0 Bd7 12.Qd2
J3.Rad1 (better is l3.dxc5 BxcS
14.b4) l 3.-cxd4 14.cxd4 Be7 with a
big advanrage for Black, Thrpugov-
We examine Blll ) ~.Nc3 and Botvinnik, Moscow 1951.
Blll) 6.Nbd2.
a2) IO...Ob6 lt.O..O? (better is
~ldom s~n ~re; ll.Rbl Bd7 12.0·0 Bb5 ==)
a) 6.e5 Qe77.Nbd2 g6 8.Bd3 Bg7 ll ... Qxb2? (better is 1l...c4 12.&2
9.0-0 dxe5 10.dxe5 No6 11.Qe2 Qxb2 = +) 12.Rbl Qa3 13.c4 dxc4
Bd7 12.g3 gS unclear, Grivas- 14.Be4 cxd4 15.Qxd4· Bc5 16.Qxc4
Luther, Lenin&rad 1989. Q.O unclear, Yap-Sax, Szi rak
b) 6.c3 Nd7 7.Bd3 b6 8.0·0 Bb7 1985.
9.a4 a6 10.Nbd2 Qd8 ll.Nel cS b ) 6 ...g5?! 7.e5! Oe7 8 .b4 g4
12.Qg4 cxd4 13.cxd4 eS 14.f4 +=, 9.Nd2 h5 to.f4 gx.f3 ll.NxD Nc6
Dreev-Kengis, USSR 1988. 12.Bb5 Bd7 13.Qe2 dxe.S l4.Bxc6
c) 6.Bd3 Bxc6 l S.NxeS Qb4 16.0-0-0 Bg?
cl) 6...g6 7.0·0 Bg7 8.e5 Qe7 17. Nxf7! Kxf1 18.Rhfl + Bf6
'9.Qe2 Nd7 IO.o4 cS 11.Nc3 (Sideif- 19.d5! exd5 20.Rxf6+ 1-0, King-
Zade-A. Ivanov, USS R 1985) Summermatter, Germany 1989.
29
c) 6 ... c6 7.Qd2 (if 7.e5, B lack Fernaodes-Wirrhensohn, Dubai
sho uld play 7 ... Qd8 instead of O lympiad 1986.
7 •.• dxe5?! 8.dxe5 Q£4 9.g3 Qb4 b) 8. ..Nc6 9.Bb5 0-0
IO.a3 Q a5 1 t.b4 Qc7 12.Ne4 with a b J) 1O.e5 dxe5 1 J.Bxc6 exd4
large advantage, P·e trosian- 12.Ne4 Qe7 l3.Ba4 cS with co m -
Taimanov, USSR team champion- p e n~uti o n, H o dgs o n- Eingorn,
s hip 1960) 7 ... e5 8.0-0 -0 Be7 Reykjavik 1989.
9.Kbt Nd7 10.h4 cxd4?! 1 LNxd4 b2) 1O.Bxc6 bxc6 ll.eS QfS
Ne5 12.f4 Ng4 J3.h5 Bd8 14.Ndb5l 12.Rbel cS 13.Ne4 dxeS 14.dxe5
cxbS 15.Bxb5+ Bd7 (15 ... 1<£8 .Bb7 l5.Qe3 .6xe5 J6. N~teS QxeS
would h ave held o ut longer, al- l7.Nxc5 Qxe3 18.£xe3 Bxg2 19.Rd7
though a fte r 16.e5 White b as a with compensation, Piket-Nijboer,
very strong attack) 16.Bxd7+ Kxd7 Wij k aan Zee 1990.
17.Qe2 Qxf4 18.Rhfl QgS 19.Rf5
Qh4 20. Qb5+ Kc8 21.Rxf7 Be7
22.Nd5 J-0, Hodgson-S. Polgar.
Lucerne 1989.
d) For 6...Nc6, see Illustrative
Game 13.
7.Qd2
a) 7.Bb5+ Nd7
a l ) 8.e5 Qe7 9.dS!? dxe5 IO.Qe2
Bg7 11.0-0-0 0-0 t2.Rhet e4 =,
Shabalov-lvaoov, USSR 1987.
a2) 8.Bxd7+ Bxd7 9.Qd2 Bg7
10.0 -0 0-0 ll.RfeJ Qe712.Radl 8.0·0· 0 a6 9.h4 Bg7
a6 13.e5 Rfd8 14.Qf4 Bc6 JS.exd6 See Illustrative Game 15.
Rtd6 J6.Ne4 Bxe4 17.Qxe4 c6 =,
Bany-Levitt, Polanica Z droj 1988.
81112) 6... Nd7
b) 7.Bd3 Bg7 8.Qe2 Nd7
7.Qd2
9.0 -0 -0 a6 10.Rbel eS?l (better
is 10...Qe7) l l. Nd5 Qd8 12.dxe5 a) 7.d5 ~d5 (more so lid is 7...e5
dxe5 13.M c6 J4.Ne3 h5 J5.Bc4 bS and 8. .. g6 =) KNxd5 Qd8 9.Nd4
16.Bb3 Qe7 17.Ng5 0 ·0 18.Nf5! (stronge r is 9.Qd4 c6 10.Ne3 + =)
gx£5 19.R xd71 Qxd7 20.Rdl + -, 9...c6 10.Ne6!? O a5+ (10... fxe6??
Velikov-D. Cramling, Reggio tt.Qh5+) tl.b4 Q a3 12.Nec7-t-?!
Emilia 1980. (Better is 12.Ndc7+ Kc7 13.Nxf8
c) Fo r 7.e5, see Illustr a tive Qc3+ (l 3...Qxb4+ 14.Qd2 Qxd2+
Game 14.
1S.Kxd2 Rb8 • J 14.K e2 Nxf8
15.Nxa8 Ne6 16.f3 Nd4+ 17.K.f'2
7 ... Qe7 Nxc 2 18. R c l QeJ+ + =, Maka-
7...Bg7 8.0·0 ·0 richev) 12 ... Kd8 13.Rbl cxdS
a) 8 ... 0 e7 9.e5 dxe5 IO.Nxe5 14.Rb3 Oxb3 ( 14 ...0x.a2 l5.Nxa8
Nd7 1 1.{4 NxeS 12.fxe5 Bd7 13.g3 dxe4 16.Bc4 Ne5 17.Bd5) 15.axb3
0 ·0 14.Bg2 c5 15.dxc5 R fd8 + , = Kxc7 16. Qxd 5 Lerner- Maka-
30
•
7 ...c6
a) Not 7...g6'! &. Nb5 Oll8 9.Qc3
c6 IO.dS.
b) 7...86 8.0-0-0.
bl) 8. ..g6 (8...c5'll 9.dxc5) 9.e5
(for 9.Bd3, see Illustrative Game
16)
bll) 9 ... Qe7 IO.Qf4 dxe5
t l.dxe5 Bg? 12.Bd3 g5 13.Qg3 h5
14.Rhel Bh6 15.Nd2 Nc5 ( 15 ...Bg7
9.dxeS
16.h4) 16.Nde4 Nxc4 17.Nxe4 Kf8
18.Nf6 g4 + t9.Kb 1 Bg7 20.Qf4 For 9.b4?! see Jllus trative Game
Bh6 2J.Qe4 +=, H o rt- Wirtbeo- 17.
sohn. San Bernardino 1984. 9...Nxt5
b12) 9 ...dxe5 JO.dxe.S Q e7 A mistake is 9 ...dxe5? tO.NbS!
11.Ne4 Bg7 12.Qc3 Nb6 13.Nf6 + a) I0 ...cJCb5 ll .Dxb5
Qe6
K£8 14 .Be2 Bd7 15.Qxc7 Bb5 12 .Nxe5 Qxe5 13.Bxd7 + Ke7
16.Qxb6 BxeZ l7 .Rd7 +·, I 4.8 xcR +-.
Hodgso n- Ward, Jlllringey 1988. b) 10 ...Rb8 ll.Nxo7 Nc5 12.Nxc8
b2) 8. .. Qd8 9.h4 b5 tO.BdJ Bb7 R xc& J3 .b4 Q e6 14 .bxc5 Bxc5
I J.Kbl c5 12.dxc5 NxcS 13.Qe3 Q c7 15.0c3 ~ -. Kli nger-King. Lucerne
14.Nd4 0 -0 -0 !? unclear, Hod~on 1989.
Miles, Kuala Lumpu r, 1992. c) !O... Kd8 ll.Qc3? (correct is
31
ll.Qa5+! b612.Qc3 cxbS 13.Bx:b5 7.c3
Bd6 14.Qc6 or 12... a6 13.N'd6 Bxd6 7 . Bd3 e5 8.c3 g6 9 .N c4 Bg7
14.Qxc6 +·) ll...cxbS J2.BxbS Bd6 tO.dS 0 -0 ll.Ne3 hS 12.Qe2
13.Rxd6 Qxd6 14.Rdl Qc7 -+,
Bb6 13.0 -0 -0 Nc5 14.Bc2 Bg4
Hodgson- Mednis, Stavanger 1990.
15.Kbl Bxf3 16 . gxf3 aS • + ,
After 9... N'xeS, strongly wortb
considering is 1O.Nd4. I nstead
Hoi- Browoe, Reykjavik 1988.
Plaskett- Ward, Hastings t 989-90, 7... g6
continued IO.NxeS QxeS l l.f4 Qa5 a) Tntere~t ing is 7...g5! ? 8.Nc4
12.Bc4 Be7 13.Kb1 bS unclear. g4 (8 ... Bg7 9.Bd3 Qe7 I O.Qe2
8112) 6.Nbd2 b6 11.0-0-0 Bb7 12. Rhe1
6...Nd7 0 -0 · 0 13. Kbl Kb8 14. NaJ Nf6
a) 6•..No6 7.c3 g68.Bb5 Bd7 9.0 -0 15.Nd2 Qd7 16. Ba 6 Q c8
Bl7 10.e5 dxe5 11.Bxc6 Bxc6 I16. .. Ba8!? J 17.Bxb7 Qxb7 18.f3
12.Nxe5 Bb5 t3.Rel (Black also has + =, Yusupov-G urgenidze,
problems after 13.c4 Bc6 14.Nxc6 USSR 1981) 9.Nfd2 (worth con·
bxc6 15.Nf3 0 -0 16.Ne5)
sidering is 9.e5!? Qe7 10.exd6
13 ...0-0-0 14.a4 Be8 15.b4 +"",
Zlotnilc:-Andreiev, Burevestni1c 1976. cxd6 l t.Nfd2 dS 12.Ne3 h5 un·
An example in which the Knights are c lear, accord ing to Browne)
superior to the Bishop pair. 9 ... h5 I O. b3 Bh6 1J . Bd3 e5
b ) 6 ...g6 7.Bd3 Bg7 8.e5 Qe7 12.Ne3 Nb6 13.dxe5 Qxe5 = +,
9.0-0 Nd710.Rel dxe5 ll.dxe.S b6 Silman-Browne. USA 1987.
t2.Qe2 Bb7 13.Qe3 Rd8 14.Qf4 g5 b) 7... Qd8 8.Bd3 Be7 9.Qe2 c5
1S.Qg3 Qb4 16.Nc4 QcS 17.a4 Bd5 10.b4 cxd4 ll.cxd4 e5 12.0-0-0
18.b3 Qe7 19.a5 B)[£3 20.axb6 axb6 Bf6 ? 13.Nc4 Qc7 t4.Bc2 Be7
21.gxt3 NcS unclear, Giffard- Kos- I.S .Ne3 + =. McCa mbridge-
te n, Canoes 1988.
Reshevsty, USA 1988.
c) 6.,_Qe7 7.Bd3 g6 8.0.0 eS 9.c3
8. Bd3 Bg7 9.a4
Bg7 10. Nc4 0-0 ll.Ne3 Nd7
12.Rel Nf6 13.a4 c6 14.dxe5 <beeS a) 9.0·0 0 -0
15.85 Ng4 16.Nc4 Be6 t 7.Qe2 Rad8 al) 10 . Rel e5 1l.Qe2 Qe7
=, Dreev-Romanishin. Lvov 1987. l2.Nc4 Nb6 13.Ne3 ( 13. NaS t'!)
13 ... h5 J4 .b3 a5 = + , Gruen-
feld- Wirthenso hn, Biel 1981.
a2) 1O.a4 eS ll.dxe5?!
(l l.Qc2) 11...dxeS 12.a5 Rd8
13.Qe2 NcS J4.Bc2 Ne6 == + ,
Ortega-Psakbis , Alma·Ata
1986.
b) 9.Qe2 a6 10.a4 b6 11.0-0
Q . 0 12.b4 Bb7 13.aS b5 t 4 .c4
bxc4 15. Bxc4 R a7 = , Botteriii-
Andersson, Hastings 1978-79.
32
•
BU) S•..dS
9...Qe7
9..•a.5 10.0-0 and now:
a) 10...0 -0 11.Re1 e5 12.Nc4
Qe7 13.Qb3 b614.Ne3 Bd7 JS.NdS
Qd8 16.Radl += , Johanssen-
Lawlon. London 1984.
b) IO...e5 I l.d5 0 -0 12.b4 Qe7
13.Qc2 Nf6 14.Nb3 axb4 15.cxb4 Not a popular move:. Black fixes
NbS 16.Rfcl Nf4 17.Bb5?! the position too early. If White
(17.Bf1) 17... £5 18.Qxc7 Qf6 un- were now to play 6.Nc::3, we would
clear, Silman- Benjam in, USA transpose into a vari ation of tbe
1989. French Defense { l.e4 e6 2d4 dS
10.a5 a6 11.0-0 0 -0 12.Rret eS 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.Bxf6 Bxf6
IJ.Qcl 6. Nf3 ). However . White plays
6.Nbd2, leaving c2-c3 open.
t6 ,Nbd2
A Frence Defense $tru cture also
resulted in Ermenkov-Burger,
New York 1980 after 6.c5 Qd8
7 .Nbd2 c5 8.c3 Q b6 9.Qb3 Bd7
10.Be2 Nc6 11.0-0 Be7 12.dxcS
Bxc5 13.Rael + =.
6...Nc6
a) 6-.QdB 7.Bd3 Be7 8.0-0 0 -0
9.Qe2 c5 10.dxc5 Bxc5 ll.Nb3 Bbo
12.Radl +=, Smith-Fiear, Great
Britain ChampionshiP' 1978.
A typical posi\ion in this varia-
tion. White has the mo re comfort- b) 6... dxe4 7.Nxe4 0d8 8.Bd3
able position. Black can keep the Be? 9.c3 Nd7 l0.Qc2 c6 11.0-0-0
equilibrium but should not remain + =, Hoi-Hansen, E~bjcrg 1982.
passive . In the game Psakh is- 7.c3 Bd7 8.Bd3
Makarichev. USSR Championship Risky is 8.Qb3 0-0-0 9.exd5
33
exdS lO.QxdS BfS =+. Leip1.ig 1973.
8-.0-0-0 9.e5 b) 7 ... exd5 8.QxdS Be7 9. c3
Wbite would also get a large ad- 0-0 10.0-0-0 Nc6 ll.Qe4 d6
vantage afler 9.b4 gS 10.b5 Ne7 12.exd67! (12.Bd3 &6 13.Bc4 BfS
lt.Qa4 Kb8 12.Ne5. 14.Qe3 +=, Ubhnann) 12 ... Bxd6
9 ...Qe7 10.b4 &5 ll.Nb3 g4 t3. Nb.S ReS 14.Qa4 Re6 15.Bc4
U .Nfdl QgS 13.0·0 16 l4.b5 NxeS Rf6 16.Rhet BfS 17.Bd3 Bxd3
Practically forced . lC 14... Nc7, 18.Rxd3 a6 19.Nxd6 Rxd6 ::::,
then 15.f4 gxf3 16.Nx0. After the Malicb- Zaitsev, Berlin 1986.
text, Vaganian- Psakhis, USSR c) Perhaps best is 7... Qb6 8.Nc3
Championship 1983, con ti nued and now:
15.dxe5 fxeS 16.c4 bS 17.Qe2 e4 c l ) 8 ...g5 9.Nd2 Qxb2 10.Nde4
18.Nxe4 dxe4 19.Bxe4 with a large with compensation, Pribyi-
advanta&e to White. Videnkeller, l983.
c2) 8...a6 9.Nd2 Qxb2 10.Ndc4
813) s...cS'!! Qb4 ll.Rbt Qa5 12.a4 Be? 13.Bc4
A dubio us move which allows w ith compensation, Thai-
White to roll his center forward. Sita nggang. Asian Team Cham-
pionship 1991.
JU4) s...b6
6.Nbd2
a) 6.Nc3 Bb7 7.8<13 Bb4 (7...d6
8.Qe2 Qd8 9.0-0 Nd7 (9... a6!1)
IO.d5 e.S ll.Bi16 Bxa6 120xa6 +.,,
B. Schmidt-Miles, Germany 1981-
82 or 7...g5 8.Qe2 Nc6 9.e5 Qg7
10.Ne4 g4 ll.Nf6+ Kd8 12.Nd2
Nxd4 13.Qe3 Bc5 14.Qg3 Be7
JS.Qf4 Nc6 16.Nde4 unclear, Mur-
6.e5 Qd8 7.dSI shed-Conquest, London 1989)
H armless is 7.Nc3 cxd4 8.Nxd4 8.0·0 Bxc3 9.bxc3
Nc6 9.Nxc6 bxc6 10.Bd3 Rb8= . al ) 9...d6 10.Nd2 e5 1 l.f4 exf4
Thrre-Sam isch, M arianske La,ne 12.g3 gS 13.a4 Nc6 14.0t:2 0-0-0
1925. After the text move White 15.a5 NxaS J6.Ba6 Bxa6 17.Qxa6+
stands well, ns the following ex· unclear, Spassky-Miles, N iksic
amples demonstrate: 1983.
n) 7...d6 8.Bb5+ Bd7 9.Bxd7+ a2) 9 ... 0·0? 10.Nd2 c5 ll.f4
Qxd7 10.0 -0 Na6 (10 ... dll:e5 cxf4 (1 1...exd4 12.e5 Qc6 13.Be4)
li.NxeS Qltd5 12.Qxd5 exdS 12.e5 Q h4 t3.Ne4 d5 14.g3 Qh3
t 3.Rel Be7 14.Nc3 0-0 15.Nxd5 15.Nf6+ gx£6 18.Rxf4 £xe5 17.Bf5
Bd8 16. Rad I + ~ ) I J.exd6 8xd6 exf4 18.Bxh3 fxg3 19.Qg4+ Kh7
l2.dxe6 fxc6 13.Nbd2 0-0-0 20.Qf5 + Kg8 2t .Qf6 1-0, Cifuen-
14.Qe2 + =, M alicb-GrOnberg, tcs-Ligterink, Wijk aan Zee 1988.
34
•
-~..~.~.~: ~I!
oc~~~i~\r
-~~w ft ,. .
~~~~1 " ~·~'fj~~
~·
-~Mffti~~~ ~jrt~it'
7.Q d2 u6 ~~-~&-ti~:a_p~_;f
7 ... 0-0 8.e5 Qe7 9.0-0 -0 d 6
10.&4?! Nd7 ll.Q f4 a6 12.Bd3 bS A fter 6.c3 d5 7. Nbd2 we
13.Ne4 B b7 14.exd6?! cxd6 t ranspOse into Vaganian- Psakhis.
15.Qxd 6 Q xd6 16.Nxd6 Bxf3 USSR 1983. given in 812.
17.g,cf3 Nb61S..c3 Ra7 l9.Ne4 NdS
20.Rhel Rd8 2 1. Nc5 b4 22.Kc2 lSl) S. NbdZ
bxc3 23.bxc3 Nxc3l -+, Timman- s...d6
Lobron, TV World Cup, Hamburg Worth considering is 5 ... c5 and
1982. now:
8.0 -0 -0 b5 9.e5 Q e7 lO.Ne4 d S a) 6.Ne4 Qf5 7.Ng3 Qf6 8.e3
36
•
23.ND!
A very strongZwisclletrzugwhich
gives White contro l o f the eS
square. ·
Z3 ..•Qg7 24 .ed6 Qxf6 2S.Ne5
Kl8
Also losing is 2$_.Be8 26.Qh7+
Kf8 27.Ng6+. 16 ... Bg4 17.Rd3?
26.Nxf7! K e7 27 . Ne5 Kd6 The o n ly move was 17.Qc3.
28 . Qd2 b4 29 .Nc4 + K c7 Black would be sl ightJy better after
30.~xb4 N a4 31.Bc2 Kd8 l7... b5 t 8.Nc5 Bb6.
32.Nc5 Nb6? 33.Qd4 1·0 17...b5! 18.NcS?!
18.Nc3 Bb6 would have held out
longer.
JllusurzJive Game 17
18...Bb6 19.Rc3
GM J uti an Hodgson Black would get a strong attack
GM lan Rogers after 19.b4 a5 20.c3 Qe7.
Wljk 11an Zce 1989
19 ...Qe7
l.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 e6 3 . ~4 h6 Thre~ te ning 20... b4 21.Rc4 Be6.
25-.Bxd4
Exchanging off White's active
Knight, but now h is King position
is weakened. If 25... Bd7, then
26.axb7 Rxb7 27. Nc6 Bxc6
(27 ... Qf6 28.Re7 Bxc6 29.dxc6
We will classify the variations ac-
Oxe7 30.cxb7) 2&.dxc6 Rb8 29.Bd5
Qf6 30.Re3. cording to the pl an that Black
chooses: A) ... Nbd7, ...b6, ...8b7;
26.Qxd4 b6 B) .... cs, ... c6; C ) ... b6.
Better was 26...bxa6.
27.b4 Bd7 .28.80 gxh4 A) lllack plnys • w bd7, ...b6, ~. 8b7
If 28..• Qf8, then 29.1ug5 hxg5 4 ...c5
30.0£6 Qg7 3 t.Qxg7 + K xg7
Black can also play without ...c5:
32.Re7 Rd8 33.BhS +-.
4 ... Be7 5.Nbd2
29.glth4 Qf8 30.Kh2 ReS o) 5... 0 -0 6.Bd3 b6 7.Ne5 Bb7
3l.Rgl + Kh7 32 .Qt6 ReS 8. Bxf6 Bx£6 9.£4 Bxe5 1O.fxe5
33.Bdl BfS 34.Bh5 Bd3 3S.B"r7 Qh4 + 1 l.g3 Qh6 12 .Qe2 Nc6
Re8 36.Rg3 Bbl 37.RI3 Rd8 13.0 -0 ( not 13.c3 f6) 13 ... Nb4
38 .Bg6 + Bxg6 39.Qxrs Rxf8 14. Rf4 + = , Timman-Geller,
40.Rxf8 1-0 Linarcs 1983.
b) 5... b6 6.Bd3 Bb7 7.Bxf6 Bxf6
Conclusion: After l.d4 Nf6 2.NO 8.c3 0-0 9.h4 (the point of 7.Bxf6:
e6 3.Bg5 b6 4.Bh4, Black can win t he defensive f6 -Koigbt i:i ex·
the Bishop pair with 4...g5 5.Bg3 changed and the gS square is avail-
Ne4 or transpose into Chapter 1 able to the whi te Knight) 9... Nd7
with 4.-c5. After 4.Bxf6 Qxf6 Black 10.Ng5 g6 1t.Qg4 h5 12.Qg3 Bxg5
has the two Bishop~ and a solid posi· t3. hx~S c.S 14.0-0 -0 aS 1S.Qd6 c4
tion, but must play accurately. After 16.Bc2 Ra7 17.g4 + ""• Oullego-Al-
S.e4 the best move u 5...d6 and if O thman, World Junior Champion-
tbeo 6.Nf3, then 6... a6 or 6.•.Nd7 ship, Kiljav-d 1984.
7.Qd2 c6 £ollowed by ...Be7 and ...eS c) 5... Nbd7 6.Bd3 0 -0 7.c3 b6
are worth considering. 8.b4 Bb7 9.Qbl h6 10.Bb4 NhS
ll.Bg3 Qc8 J2.Be5 Nbf6 13.0-0 gar-Dive, Wellington 1988.
c5 =. Petrosian-Andersson, Am- b222) 9.8 xf6 Bxf6 lO.f4 Ba6
sterdam 1973. l 1.Bxa6 Nxa6 12.Ndf1 Nc7 13.Qe2
S.cl 8 e7 Ne8 =.
Platonov- Dolmatov, Thsh·
5--Nbd7 6.Nbd2 tent 1980.
a) 6...Bd6 7.Bd3 h6 8.Bh4 Q . Q b223) 9.0-0 Nfd7 10.Bxe7 Qxe7
9.0-0 b6 10.e4 dxe4 l t.Nxe4 Be7 I J.f4 Ba6 l2.Bxa6 Nxa6 13.Qa4
l 2.dxc5 Nxc5 13.Nxc5 bxcS 14.Qe2 Nb8 14.b4 +=, Spassky-HCibner,
Bb7 15. R ad t Qc7 l6.N e5 +=. Montreal 1979.
M eister- Pigusov, USSR 1985.
b) 6 ...Qb6 7.Rb I h6 8.Bh4 Bd6
9.B<J3 Qc7 10.Qe2 cxd4 Jl .cxd4
0-0 12.0-0 a6 13.Rbct Qb8
14.Bbl b6 1S.e4 dxe4 16.Nxe4 Nd S
17.Nxd6 Qxd6 18.Qc2 N7f6 19.Ne5
Bb7 u nclear, R ongguan g Ye-
Lukov, Thessaloniki Olympiad
1988.
6.Nbd2
6.Bd3 would be inexact: 6...Qb6
7.Qb3 c4 8.Qxb6 axb6 9.Bc2 bS fol-
lowed by ... b4.
7.Bd3 b6
6 ...Nbd7
a) The moves 7.•.h6 8.Bb4 have
a) 6...b6 7.Bd3 Bb7 8.Ne5 Nbd7 often been inserted here.
9.Bb5 0-0 l O.Nc6 Bxc6 11.Bxc6 Yusupov-Speelman, Hastings
R c8 12.Bb5 Ne8 l3.Bf4 Bd6 =. 1989-90. conti nued 8 ... b6 9.Ne5
Barlov-Psakhis, Socbi 1984. NxcS lO.dxeS Nd7 ll .Bxe7 Qxe7
b) 6 ... 0-0 7.Bd3 b6 12.£4 Bb7 t3.Qe2 0 - 0 -0
bl) 8.0 .0 Nbd7 9.Qbl h6 14.0-0 -0 £6 15.exf6 grl6 16.e4 d4
10.Bh4 Bb71l.b4 cxb4 12.cxb4 R c8 17.c4 hS 18.g3 K b8 19.Nf3 bS
13.Bg3 R c3 14.a3 Nb5 I S.Be5 f6 20.Rbel (20.cxb5 Nb6 21.Nd2 fS)
16. Bf4 Nxf4 17.exf4 Bd6 = ; Nb6 =+.
Kiselov-Oavrikov, Moscow 1983. b ) Dubious is e xch a nging
b2) 8.Ne5 7 ...cxd4 8.exd4. White will obtain a
b21) 8...Nfd7 9.Qh5 g6 10.Bxe7 strong position by playing 0-0.
0~Ce7 11 .Qh6 Nxe5 12.dxe5 Nc6 Oe2, Rael. Ne5.
13.f4 f6 14.Bb5 dS 15.Nf3 flte5 c) Also dubious is 7...a6?! 8.0-0
16.Nxe5 + =, Kiselev-lvaoeoko, b5 9.Ne5 Bb7 10.f4 c4 ll .Bc2 Ne4
Moscow 1984. 12.Bxe7 Qxe7 13. Bxe4 dxe4
b22) 8... Bb7 14.Nxd7 Qxd7 t 5.b3 0-0 16.bxc4
b221) 9.Qf3 Nbd7 IO.Rdl cxd4 blCc4 17.Qc2 Qc6 tS.R abl + ;;,
tl.exd4 a6 12.0 -0 ReS 13.Rde l Seirawan- L ars.en, unares 198:3.
N £8 14.Qh3 bS 1S.a3 Qb6 16.Re3 d) Black also h as no reason to
a5 17.Qb4 b4 18.Rh3 +·, Zs. Po l- immediately castle (forfeiting the
44
•
45
9.Ne5
a) 9.Qbl (a common maneuver
in this position, controlling tbe e4
square and bolstering queenside
play beginning with b2-b4) and
now:
at) 9 ...Qc7 10.b4
a ll) tO...c4 t l.Bc2 b6 12.Bh4
0.0 13.a4 a6 14.Re 1 R fc8 15.Re2
b5 I 6.a5 Re8 17.Qel Rad8 l&.Rcl
Qb8 19.Bb l Q c7 20.Qd l 8 a8
2 t.Qc2 Bb7 22.Rfl QbS 23.Bxf6
Nxf6 2 4.N e5 Bd6 2S.f4 Ne4 = , ·~~N?'iS lO:dxeS Nd! /
Hodgson-Uozicker, Almada 1988. 10... Ne4'rTosenfpawo: ll .Bxe7
Qxe7 12.Nxe4 dxe4 13.B.xe4 Bxe4
a12) 10...Rb8 ll.c4 dxc4 l2.Bf4
l4.Qa4 +.
Bd6 13.Bxd6 Qxd6 14.Nxc4 ~7
IS.e4 bS t6.Na5 cxb4, Tukmakov- (_ll.Bxe7
Schussler, H elsinki 1983. Tuk- An. inaccuracy would be ll.Bf4? !
makov now re.commeods J7.Nxb7 Soe..Jllwtrative Game 21.
Qxb7 1&. Qc2 +=. - (u..... ...Qxe7 u .r4 f6
a2) 9...h6 t0.Bh4 Qc7 11.b4 Bd6 12...0-Q..O--
and n ow D amljan ovic- Vailer, a) 13.a4 f6 14.exf6 gxf6 1.5.a.5_c§
Vrojack a B anja 1986. continued 16~ BeZb'5 i7.a6 Bc6 l ~.b.4}{b6 un-
l 2.Rfcl c4 13.Bc2 a6 14.a4 Ng4 clear, Garcia- Kortcbnoi, Las Pal-
1S.h3 Ngf6 16.Bxf6 Nxf6 t7.Rel mas 'i98t..
•
0-0-0 = +. Instead White should b) J3.Qe2 f6 14.c:xf6 gxf6 (weak :.·
play 12bxcS bxc5 13.e4 = . is 14 ... Nxf6 15.Nf'3 c4?! 16.Bc2 Kb8
J7.Qdl Nd7 18.Qd4 Rde8 19.Ba4
b) 9.a4 a6 10.Qbl h6
R ef8 20.Bxd7 Qxd7 21 .a4 Qc7
bl ) 11.Bf4 N h S 12 .Be5 0 -0
22.a5 bxaS 23.Ne5 K.a8 24.Ra2 Qb6
13.b3 c4 14.Bh7+ Kb8 15.Bc2 bS 25 .Rfal +=, H ebert-lvanov,
= , Hort- Kir. Georgiev, Thes- Mo ntreal 1983) IS.e4 d4 {JS ...c4
salon iki Olympiad 1984. J6.Bc2 Kb8 17.b3 +=; J5_. Nb8
b2) 1 t.Bh4 0-0 J2.Rel Qc7 l6.exd 5 Bxd5 17.Be4! with the idea
13.e4 dxe4 14.Nxc4 R fe8 lS.dxcS Nc4, a4 + =) 16.a4, see Spassky-
bxcS l 6 .Nxf6+ Bxf6 J7.Bg3 Q c8 Sokokw-b&lo.y.r.
18.Nd2 Be7 19.Nc4 BdS 20.Qc2
~M -:Qits+____ -
Qbi •, H odgsoo-Ruuvaev, Sochi a) J • xf6 g:d6 J 4.e 4 0 -0 -0
1987. 15.Qe2 d4 16.a4 e 5 ( 16 ... a 5? 1
c) 9.Qc2 0 -0 10.Raet c4 ll.Be2 17.Ra3! with the idea R b3, Bxa5)
bS 12.Ne5 NxeS t3 .dxe5 Ne 4 l7.f5 Nb8 18.a5 dxc3 ( 18 ... N c6
14.Bxe 7 Qxe7 1S.f4 QcS 16.Bf3 f5 l 9.axb6 axb6 20.Ba6 with good at-
17.exf6 Nxf6 '"'• Time-A. Sokolov, tac ki n g prosper.ts, S passlcy-A .
Biel 19&5. Soko&ov, Bugojno 1986) l9.bxc3
46
• •
6...d 7.Bd3
7.Bb5+ Nfd7 8.Bf4 0 -0 9.N e5
Nxe5 10.dxe5 Ba6 ll.Bxa6 xa6
J2.Qg4 Kb8 13.Rdt Qe8 14.0-0
Qa4 15.e4 Nc7 16.a3 + =, Klaric-
Flear, London 1979.
7...0·0 8.N~S
8 .0-0 Bb7 transposes into White prevents ... g7-gS and
Spassky-H ubner. Montreal 1979. prepares g2-g4. Not 11...Bxh4?
whi ch continued 9.N eS Nfd7 due to 12.QhS.
10.Bxe7 Qxe7 1 t.f4 Ba6 t2.Bxa6 11... <:4 12.8c2 bS
Nxa6 13.Qa4 Nab8 14.b4 +=. Better is 12 ... N~S followed by
8 ...Bb7 9.14 Nt4 JO.Bxe7 Q xe7 ... Ne4 closing the whi te K ing
11.0-0 f6 U .Nt3 Nd7 13.Qc:l fS Bishop's diagonal.
14.BbS Ndf6 1S.Nxc4 dxe4 16.NeS l3.Nf3
a6 17 .Bel NdS =. Pe trosian- Petrosian gives I 3.g4 as even
G iigoric, Niksic 1983. stronger.
50
•
3 ...Bb7
3...d5 4.e3 c6 5.Nbd2 h6 6.Bh4 If Black plays a n Old Indian
Bf5 7.Bd3 Bxd.3 8.cxd3 Nbd7 9.Rcl setup, the Torre Attack is not ef-
Qb6 10.0 -0 e6 II.Bxf6 gxf6 fective.
l2.Q c2 Rc8 l3.e4 += , Wirtben- 3 ... Nbd7 4.-d h6 S.Bh4
sohn-Partos, Biel 1917. 5.Bd6 Nxf6 6.Nbd2 c6 (6...g6)
4.Nbd2 7.Bd3 Qc7 8.c3 eS 9. Q c2 Be7
4.e3 a6 JO.dxe5 dxeS 1 J.Nc4 bS 12.Ncd2
a) S.c3 e6 6.e4 h6 7.Brl6 Qxf6 0-0 13.0-0 Bb7 14.c4 b4 15.Ne4
8. Bd3 c5 9 .e5 Q d 8 10.Be4 Q b6 + =, Klama o- Karasev, USSR
1976. Bd3 --+.
S.-gS 6.Bg3 NhS 7.Nbd2
7 .Bd3 Nxg3 8.fxg3 Bg7 9.Nbd2 cS D) 2 .•.a6
10.c3 Rb8?! 11.Qe2 e6 12.0 -0
Qe7 13.Kb I ?! 0 -0 14.e5?! and
now -with 14 ... cxd4 tS.cxd4 g4
16.Nh4 Bx:d4 J7.Qxg4 Qg5 Black
bas a big advantage, Xu Jull-
Lobron, China 1988.
7.••Bg7 8.Bd3
8.Bc4 Ndf6 9.Qe2 Nxg3 IO.bxg3
dS ll.Bh3 c6 t2.e4 Nxe4 I 3.Nxe4
dxe4 14.Qxe4 Qa5+ 15.c3 ars
16.Qe2 e6 =+, Rossetto-Gligoric,
Buenos Aires 1960.
8 ...e6 9.c3 rs lO.Net?l
3.BaS t6 4.Nbdl d6 S.h3 Nbd7
Better is 10.Qe2 followed by ·
6.e4 h6 7.Be3 g6 &.c3 Bg7 9.BdJ
0 -0..0.
0 -0
10... Ndf6 11.f3 Nxg,J ll.hxaJ dS
White is better. Vei ngold-
lJ.Nel Qd6 U.Qb3 e5
Mainka, Canda5 1992 continued
Black is better, Bobm- 10.g4!? e5 11.dxe5 NxeS 12.&2 bS
Ljubojevic, Wijk aan Zee 1976. t3.Nxe5 dxe5 14.Nb3 Bb7 14.Nb3
Bb7 and was later drawn.
C) 2-.••c6
E) 2 ...b6
J.Bxs
12.exrs
This allows Black to 1Juin White's
pawn structure. Better is 12 Qe2,
and if 12... f4 (threateniing ... h6 and
...g5), then 13.e5.
10.Rxc7 Nxd2 ll.Nxd2 Bd6 12...Bx0 I3.gxf3 Nc6 14.fxg6
U.Qa4 + Kl8 13.e4 Nxe4 Nxd4 15.ph7 + Kh8
If 13 ... Qh5, then 14.Rxb7 Qx.h4 Black is much better because his
15.e5 Bxe5 16.Qa3+ +-. King is safer and the Knight is very
14.Bc4 Qxd4 1S.Rxf7 + Kg8 imposing on d4.
16 .NrJ Qxbl 17.0-0 Nc5 16.Bd R~ 8 17.R~l Rxtl +
18.Bxe6 Nxe6 19.Rxb7 b5 18.Qxcl RfS 19. Bg3 R e S
lO.Qe4 Qxa2 21.Rd7 Bxh2+ lO . Qdl Nxe2 2l.Kxe2 Qc8
2l . Kxhl R£8 Z3.Rd NcS
22.Qd3 Rc2 + l 3 .Krt Qc4
24.Rxg7 + Kxg7 lS.Qg4 + 1-0 24.Qxc4 Rxc4
B lack is winning in title endgame
1/Justram-e Garm 25 becau se W hite's R ook is tem-
NM KhapiUn porarily out of play and his pawns
NM I. Komissarov are weak and scattered.
Podolsk. Russia 1993 25.b3 Rc2 26.Kg2 Rxa2 27.Rel
l.d4 Nf6 l.NO b6 3.BgS Ne4 e6 28.Rd1 dS 29.Rel d4
4. 8h4 8b7 S.Nbd2 g6 6.e3 30.Rxe6 Rb2 31. Re8 + Kxh7
6.Nxe4 Bxe4 7.Nd2 Bb7 8.e4 Bg7 3 2 . Re7 Kg6 33 .Rxa7 Rxb3
9,c3 0-0 10.Bc4 dS 11.cxd5 BxdS 34.Kh3 RxfJ 3S. Kg4 Rf7
12.0-0 Nc6 13.Rel Bxc4 14.Nxc4 36. Ra8 Rb7 37.Ra6 d3 38.Kf3
+ =, Trifu novic- Bofbocban, Mar Bd4 39.Ra2 Bc3 41J.Ke3 Rd7
del Plata 1950. 4l.Rd2 Bxd2 + 4Z.Kxd2 KtS
6... Bg7 7.Bd3 Nxdl 8.Qxd2 cS 43.t3 b5 44.Bel Kf4 4S.h4 Kxf3
9.1C3 0..() 10.e4 cxd4 11 .cxd4 fS 46.h5 Ke4 47.Bh4 Rb7 0·1
57
6.Qc1 Bf5 7.Nbd2 Nbd7 8 .c4 e6
Chapter 6 9 .Be2 Be7 10.0-0 0-0 1 LNeS
R feB 12.Bxf6 Nxf6 J3.c5 Q c7
l .d4 d5 2.Nt3 Nr' 3.BaS 14.Bd3 Ng4 l S.Bx£5 exf5 t6.Ndf3
NxeS 17.NxcS Bf6 l 8.Nd3 Re4
=+, Masearinas- P. Nikolic, Thes-
salo niki Olympiad 1988.
4.Bh4
4.8£4 c5
a) S.dxc5 Nc6 6.e3 fG 7.c4 e5
B.Bg3 Be6 9.Nbd2 Nxd2 I O.Nxd2
BxcS • +, Rossetto- Be oko,
Buenos Aires 1960.
b) S.c3 Qb6 6.Qb3 cxd4 7.Nxd4
Qd8?! 8.e3 f6? 8. Bb5 + K£7
(8 ... B d7 9.Ne6) 9.Bc7 Qxc7
3...Ne4 10.Qxd5+ e6 11.Qxe4 e5 12.Nd2
This move gives Blad: a stTong Ob6 13.f4 Nc6 14.Nc4 Qc5 15.1>4
position. Alternatives are: Qe7 16.Nxc6 b~tc6 17 .B~tc6 Rb8
a) 3 ...e6 transposes to tbe varia- 18.Bd 5+ 1-0, D izdar-Gelfand .
tion we looked at in Chapter:}. - -:--., Halle 1987.
f b) 3...Bf5 4.c4 c6 5.Nc3 e6. 6.cxdS c) 5.e3 Qb6 6.Qe1 c.-xd4 7.exd4
: cxd5 7.e3 Be7 8.Qb3 Qb6 9.Bb5+ . Nc6 8.c3 Bf5 9.Bc2 Rc8 l.O.Nbd2
1
Nc6 10.Ne5 Nd7 1 J.Nxd7 Kxd7 ' e6 11.0-0 Be7 12.Nxe4 dxc4 (bet-
. 12.Bf4 h 5 13.NxdS +-, Gesic- ter is 12 ... Bxe4•) 13.Nc5 Nxd4
\l:-ey!i~~~r!jsy9_~7..l. . . .. " 14.Bh5 Bg6 tS.Qdl BxbS 16.QxbS
c) 3 ...Bg4 4.c4 e6 5.e3 h6 6.Bxf6 g6 17.Qdt f6 18.cxd4 fxe5 19.Bxe5
Qxf6 7.Qb3 Nc6 8.Qxb7 Kd7 0-0 20.Qg4 Rc2 2t.Qxe4 Rxb2 =,
9.cxd5 exdS 10.Bb5 t-0, Oskam- Murshed-Kaidanov, Calcutta
Euwe, H olland 1921. 1988.
d) 3 ... Nbd7 4.c4 Ne4?! 5.Bb4
dxc4 6.Qc2 Nd6 7.e4 Nb6 8.NM2
c6 9.a4 a5 10.Nxc4 g6 li.Nxb6
Qxb6 12.Bd3 Qb4+ 13 .Qc3 Bg7
J4.0 -0 + =, Petrosian-Stahlberg,
Copenhagen 1960.
e) For 3 ... c5, see Illustrative
Game26.
0 3...c6
fl) For 4. Bxf6, see Illustrative
Game27.
f'2) For 4.Nbd2. see fllustrative
Oame28. A fter the tex t we examine A)
g) 3.. .h 6 4 .Bh4 c6 5.e3 Qb6 4 ...cS and B) 4 ...c6.
58
Worth considering is 4 ...Qd6, N e4 12.a 4 Bg4 =
+ . Lillknv-
wbich threatens both :S ••• Qb4+ and Kamys t ov. USSR JIJ 4CJ n r fl .t:J
S...Qh6. H~tnsen-Sadler, Cappelle Nxc5 7. Na3 g6.
L .a Grande 1993, continu e d
S. Nbd2 Qh6 6.c3 gS 7.8 !3 Nxg3 U) 4...c6
8.fxg3 g4 9.Nc5 Qe3 = +. S.eJ ·
5 .c3 Qb6 6 .Qb3 Bf5 7.e3 h6
A) 4 ...c5 8.Nbd2 Nd7 9.Nxe4 Bxe4 t0.Be2
5.dxc5 e6 11.0-0 Bh7 12.Rfc1 Bd6 •,
R o ngguang Ye-Haba, Thes- Khapilin-Komissarov, Po dolsk
saloniki Olympiad t 988. continued 1993.
5.e3 Q b6 6.Nc3 (no t 6.Qct cxd4 s...Qb6
7.exd4 g5) 6 ... cxd4 7.Bb5+ t\c6 a) 5...Bf5 6.Bd3 Nbd? 7.0-0 Qc7
&.NxdS Q aS+ 9.b4 Qd& t0.Qxd4 S.c4 dxc4 9.Bxc4 e6 10.Bd3 Nef6
N'd6 l t.Nc3 Nxb5 J2.0xd8+ K.xdB I J.Bxf5 exf5 12.Nc3 Be7 13.d5
13.NxbS 8&4 14.Nd6 g5 15.Bxg5 f6 0-0 14. Bg3 Qb6 JS . Na4 Qa6
J6.Bh4 Kc7 17.Nb5+ Kb6 18.Nbd4 16.dxc6bxc61 7.Qc2 +=, Timman-
xd4 19.Nx<.l4 e5 unclear. Aodersson, Tilburg 1980.
5... Nc6 b) 5... Bg4 6.Be2 QbG 7.Qct Nd7
Not as strong is 5... Qa5+ 6.Nbd2 S.Nbd2 eS 9.dxe5 Nx,d2 10.Qxd2
Nc6 (6 ... Nxd2 7 . Qxd2 Qxc5 Bxrf3 ll.gxf3 Qxb2 12 .0 -0 Bb4
8.0-0 -0 c6 9.e4 + = ; 6...e6 7.c3 13.Qd l Qxe5 14.R bl a5 15.c4 0-0
Nxd2 8.0xd2 Qxc5 9.e4 + =) 7.c3 D raw. Hart.ston- Soso nko. Enr;-
Qxc5 8.e3 Bf5 9.Be2 e5 10.0-0 f6 land-Ho lland match 1977.
I J.Nxe4 d}(e4 J2.Nd2 Bg6 13.Q a4
QaS 14. 0 c2 Be7 15.Nxc4 a nd
White is muc h bette r, Berg-
Danielscn, A rhus 1992.
------ -· llhW«Uiv;:.Gm111t26
NM Christoph Mic::balek ~~ :
IM Sergey Kishnev
· , . -· . •. ··· D<Hrrtuuad 1993
l.Nr3 dS 2.d4 N£6 3.Bg5 cS 4.e3 34.Qxf6 Rxf6 3S. Rxf6 Qc8
4.dxc5 e6 5.e3 Bxc5 6.Nbd2 Nc6 36.Rx17+ Kg8 37.Nd 7 bS
7.Bd3 h6 8.Bb4 Be7 9.0·0 b6 =. Black sets a trap.
Boodarevsky- Smyslov, Moscow 38.Ne5
l945. Which White does not fall for. Not
38.Rr8+? Rxt8 39.Rxf8+ Qxf8
4 .•. Qb6 5,Qcl Nc6 6.c3 BfS 40.Nxt8 b4 4l .Ne6 b3 42.axb3 Olb3 •+.
7.Nbdl e6 38 ... b4 39. R7f5 b3 40 . Rg5 +
Black has already at least equal- Kh8 41.Rxh5 + Kg8 42.RgS +
ized. Kh8 43.Nf7+
8.Be2 h6 9.Bf4 gS 10.B&3 NhS According to Nilc:itin, there was a
ll.BeS NxeS 12. Nxe5 N f6 forced win with 43.Rf6 Kh7
13.Bd3 Bxd3 14.Nxd3 c4 44.Rh5+ Kg7 45.Rg6+ Kf8
46.Rh8+ Ke7 47. R h7+ KdS
According to Nikitin, better is
48. Rd6+ Qd7 49.Rdxd7 Kc8
14-.cxd4 15.exd4 Bd6 16.Nf3 Ne4
50. Rc7+ Kb8 5l.Nc6+ Ka8
- +. Now White is able to take the 52.Ru7 mate. Black has little
initiative due to Black's weakened
hope in any case.
kingside.
43 ...Kh7 44.Nd6 Qe6 4S.Nxe8
lS.NeS 8d6 16.14 gxf4 17.exf4 Qxe8 46.Re5 Qa4 47.axb3 cxb3
Rg8 18.0-0 Rg7 19.Qc2 NbS? 48 .Rb5 + Kg6 49.Rg5 + Kh6
Overlooking White's next simple SO.Rf6 + Kh7 St.Rn + Kh6
move. 52.Kh2 Qa6 S3.RgfS QeZ
20.Qa4 + Ke7 ll.Qd7 + Kf6 54.Kh3 Qd3 + SS.Rf3 bZ
22.Nexc4 dxtA 23.Ne4 + 56 . Rxd3 bl = Q S7.Re3 Qg6
Not 23.f5 Qc6 24.fxe6+ Nf4. S8.Ref3 Qe6+ 59.&4 l-0
23 ...Kg6 2A.Qxd6 Qxb2 2S. Ru l
1/luJfTrllil~ Game 2'1
Kh7 26.Rf2 QbS 27 .fS ex fS
28.Nd Re8 29.Ren f4 30.Qd5 GM Eduard Meduna
N f6 31.Qf5+ Rg6 3l. h4 bS NM Sergey Koul.sin
KJJto ..ic.e 1993
33.Qxf4 Qc6
60
1.d4 dS 2.8gS c6 3.Nr3 Nf6
4.Bxf6
4.c3 or S.e3 are sol id.
4 ...exf6 S.e3
5.Nbd2 Bd6 6.e4 dxe4 7.Nxe4
Bc7 8.Bd3 0-0 9.0-0 Nd7 lO. Re l
Re8 ll.c3 Nf8 12.Qb3 b513.a4 Be6
14 .Q c2 a6 1S.Nc5 Bd.S 16.Rxe8
Qxe8 J 7 .Be4 + =. Nikitin- Dol-
matov, Moscow 1978.
S ...Be6 6.Nbd2 Bd6 7.c:4 Nd7
3S.Rxb6?
8.cxdS cxdS 9.e4 Qb6 This seems to be winning, but
Wo rth considering is 9 ... d xe4 White overlooks a simple resource.
JO.Nxc4 Bb4+ ll.Nc3 Nb6 White should keep up the pressure
12.Bb5+ Bd7. witb 35.Bd5 followed by Rrt and
10. Bd3 0·0 11.0-0 Qxb2 e4-e5.
ll2.exdS BxdS 13 . Nc4 Bxt'4 35 ...axb6 36.a7 Rc3+ 37.Kxc3
J4.Bxc4 NbS + 38.Kc4 Nxa7
White is slightly be tter because Now Wbite oeeds to play for the
of Black's mis plac ed Queen. draw.
Black's doubled extr:a pawn has l it- 39.8dS Ke8 40.e5 f'Xe5 .Cl.dxeS
tle significance. gS 42.hxg5 bxgS 43.Kb4 Kt8
J4 ... Nb6 15.Rbl Qc3 16.Bb3 44 . Kt4 Ke7 45.Kb4 r6
Rad8 17.QeJ Qxel 46.exf6 + Kxf6 47.Kc4 Ke5
48.Br3 Kd6 49.Bg2 Ke5 50.80
The endgame is good for White.
Kf4 Sl.Bdl Ke3 Sl.Bc2 Kt3
Worth considering is. 17... Qc7.
531.Br5 Kf4 54. Kd5 NbS SS.Bd7
18.Rf)(d Rfe.8 19.Rxe8 + Rxe8 Nc3 + S6.Kc6 bS S7.Kc5 KeS
20.Kn Kf8 2l.a4 58.Kb4 Kd4 S9.Bc6 Draw
With the advance of the a-pawn.
Black becomes very cramped.
lllusuadve Gam~ 28
2l... Re7 22.a5 Nc8 :Z3.8d5 b6 GM Rong:uang Ye
24.a, Ke8 2S.Nd2 Kd8 26.Nc4 GM Rosendo Balinas
g6 27. 8b7 Rc7 28.Ne3 Nt7 MalaysiD 1990
29.Ke2 Bt4 30.Kd3 Bxe3
l.d4 Nf6 2 .Nt3 dS 3 .8&5 c6
Otherwise 3 l.Nc4. In a cramped
4.Nbcl2 Qb6 S.e3
position one needs to exchange
White avoids an awkward defen-
pieces.
sive move like 5.Qcl and Instead
3J.txe3 Nc8 32.g4 Ke7 33.e4 h6 sacrifices a pawn for quick
34.h4 Nd6 development.
61
5 .•. Qxb2. 6 .Bd3 Nbd7 7.0-0 Chapter 7
Qa3 S.Qe2 e6 9.1Ubl Be7 10.c4
0-0 ll.e4 dxe4 1l.Nxe4 Re8 l.d4 dS l.Nf3 N1'6 3.Bf4
Not 12... Nxe4? due to 13.Qxe4 Although technically not a Thrre
g6 14.R b3 Qd6 15.c5 Nxc5 16.dxc5 Attack system, this move can be
Oxc5 17.Rcl Qd6 18.Qh4 wi th a more dangerQus for Black than
large advantage to White. what we saw in the previous chap-
13.c5 ter.
Furthe r constricting Bl ack's
position and creating a square for
the Knight at d6.
13...QaS 14.Rb3 Qc7
Perhaps better is 14...Qd8 fo l-
lowed by 15 ... Nxe4 16.Qxe4 Nf8.
tS.Bb4 b6 16.Bg3 Qd8
If l6...Qb7, then 17.a4 threaten-
ing a4~a5 -a6.
17.Ne5 Bb7
If J7... Nxe5, tbe n 18.Bxe5 Bd7
We witl examine five moves:
19.Nxf6 + Bxf6 20.Bxh7+ Kxh7
21.Qb5 + mating. .cs,
A ) J .. B ) ~...urs,
C) 3 ...
D) 3 ...c6, E) 3...e'6. _ '
o,. .
3... g6 iranspose,s into Chapter
10.
A) J ...c5
4.e3
a) Wo rth considering is 4.c3
al) 4 ... Q b6 5.Q b3
al l ) S...c4 6.Qc2 g6 7.Nbd2 Bf5
8.Qc t h6 9. b3 g5 1O.BeS Nbd7
l l.g3 Nxe5 12.Nxe5 e6 13.Bg2 Qc7
14.0 -0 Bd6?! (l 4...Bg7) 15.Nexc4
dxc4 J6.e4 Bg6 17.e 5 +=, 0\er-
t8.Nxr7! NxcS
nikov-Fedorov, USSR 1981.
If 18.. .Kxf7, tben 19.Ng5+.
al2) .Le6 6.h3 cxd4 7.cxd4 Qxb3
19.Nxd8 Nxb3 20.Nxf6 + Bxf6 8.axb3 Nc6 9.e3 Bd7 t 0.Nc3 ReS
21.Bxh7 + 1-0 11.Bd3 Nb4 12. Bb 1 BbS 13.Kd2
Ba6 14.Rc1 Nd? 15.Ne t f6 16.Nd3
Conclusion: Afte r 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 e 5 17. dxe5 Bxd3 18.Bxd3 fxe5
N£6 3.Bg5, 3... Ne4l gives Black a t 9.Bg3 uncl ear , Sa ntos-Alelc-
fi ne position. sandrov, European Team Cham-
62
..
pioosbip, Debreceo 1992. be1ter is 7...e6) 8.dxc.S Qxc.S
a2) 4... Nc6?! 5.d:xc5 g6 6.g3 Bg7 a) 9.Nb3 Qb6 10.Qd2 e6 ll.Bd3
7.Bg2 0-0 8.0 -0 Ne4 9.Ng5 f5 B e 4 12.Qe2 Be7 13.0-0 0 -0
10.Nxe4 fxe4 ll.Qd2 Ne5 12.Na3 14.Bg5 =, Capablanca-Maroczy,
Be6 13.Rad 1 Qa5 14.c4 Qxd2 New York 1924.
15.Rxd2 dxc4 16.Bxe4 Rac8 t7.Be3 b ) 9. Qd 1 Qb6 IO.Q b3 Qxb3
Ng4 18.Bxb7 +-, Granda Zunigll- 1! J.axb3 Nh5 12.BbS Nxf4 t3.exf4
B6nscb, Capabla nca Memorial a6 14.Bxc6+ Rxc6 1S.Nd4 + =,
1987. Kne zevic-Osma no'V i c, Sarajevo
b) 4.dxc5 e6 5.e3 BxcS 6.c4 0-0 1981.
7.Nd Nc6 8.a3 ReS 9.Ne5 Bd6
JO.Nxc6 bxc6 l1.Bx:d6 Qxd6 12.Be2
Rb8 13.b4 aS 14.b)(a5 QeS 15.Qd4
Qxd4 16.exd4 e5 =
+. Grooten-
Van der Werf. Wijk: aan Zee 1993.
4...Nc6
4 ... Bg4 5.Nbd2 Nc6 6.c3 e6
?.Qa4 Bxf3 8.Nx:f3 Qb6 9.Qb5
(9.Rb1 Be7 10.Bd3 0-0 11.0-0
R fd8 =, Keres-Reshevsky, Kemeri
1937) 9 ... Qxb5 tO.Bxb5 a6 11.Be2
+ =. Berzog- Noglleiras, Lucerne
Olympiad 1982.
6 ...c4 7.Qxb6
S.c3
7.Qc2 BfS 8.Qcl h6 9.Nbd2 Qd&
S. Nc~ (with the i.dea of 6.NbS): 10.b3 cxb3 tl.ub3 e6 t2.Ne5 Nxe5
a) 5...Bg4 6.dxc5 13.Bxe5 Nd7 t 4. Bg.3 Be7 1S.Be2
b) 5 ... Qa5 6.Bib5 Ne4 7.0-0 0-0 16.0-0 a6 t7.c4 Bb4 18.cS cS
Nxc3 8.Bxc6+ bx<-6 9.bxc3 Oxc3 19.Nf.3 Bg4 20.b3 BhS 21.Qd1 e4
JO.NeS cxd4 lt.exd4 B£5 12.Rbl £6 22.Ne l Bxe2 23.Qxe2 Nb8 24.Nc2
13.Nd3 Qxd4 14.Rb4 Qc3 t5.Rb7 Nc6 25.Bd6 Re8 26.Qh5 Qg5
Rd8 16.Rxa7 e5 17. Rel ? (17.Bd2 27 .QxgS bxg5 28.f3 g6 29.fx e4
= + ) 17 ... e4?? ( 17 ... Bxd3 - + ) Rxe4 30.Rf3 BaS 3 I.Rafl f5 32.g4!
t8.Ra4! +-, Meduoa- Yakovich, + =. Lputian-Yakovich, Moscow
Socbi 1986. 1992.
c) 5...cxd4 6. Nb~! ? (6.exd4 Bg4 7 ...axb6 8.Na3
=) 6 ... Qa5+ 7.Qd2 (7.c3 dxc3 8.a3 b5 9.Ne5 e6 IO.b4?! {better
8.bxc3 Bg4 =+) 7... Qxd2+ 8.Kxd2 iis t0.Nbd2, although Black is be t-
dxe3+ 9.Exe3 Kd71 lO.Rdl (10.Nc7 ter after 10 ...b4) tO... NhS ll.Nxc6
e5!) 10... e6 11.c4 (1 1.Nc7! Rb8 Nxf4 12.exf4 bxe6 and the a-pawn
. ~~ ') f
12.Nb5 ::r) 1l... Bc5! 12.Kc t .. is very weak. Black went on to win
(12.Nc7!) 12...a6 - +, Rakjc-Cvet- after 13.Nd2 f6 14.NO Bd6 15.g3
kovic. Yugoslavia 1991. 0 -0 16.Be2 Rf7 l7.Kd2 Rfa7 in
s...Qb6 6.QbJ Kovacevic-Ribli, Bugojno 1984.
6.Qc1 Bf5 7.Nbd2 ReS (perhaps s...Ras
63
a) Wort h considering is 8 ...e6 10.Nxc6 Qd7 I t.Bg3 Qxc6
9.Nb5 Kd7. 12.Qxc6+ bxc6 13.Kf3 + =,
b) For 8 ...e5, see lllusr rative Hulak-Rowley, New York 1989.
Game29. 4.•.c6
9.Bt7 srs a) 4 ...e6 5.Qb3 is s trong for
a) 9...e5?! JO.Nc2 e4 tl.Nd2 Ra6 White.
J2.a4 + '""• Kovacevic-Kristensen, b) 4 .. .dxc4 5.Qa4 + c6 6.Qxc4
Thessaloniki Olympiad 1988. Nbd7 7.Nc3 e6 8.a3 Be? 9.g3 Nb6
b) 9...e6 10.Nc2 (l0.8xb6 Ra6 10.Qb3 0-0 1l.Bg2 NfdS 12.Bd2
11.Bc5 BxcS 12.dxc5 RaS) 10...Kd7 Nxc.3 13.Bxc3 Be4 J 4.0 -0 Draw,
11.Bf4 b5 12.a3 +=. Meduna- Lecbtyosky, Czechoslo-
The text move prevents Nc2.
vakian Olampionship, Prague 1992.
S.e3 e6 6.Ne3 Nbd7 7.Qb3 Qb6
tO.Bxb6
8.cS Qxb3 9.a:xb3 a6 1O.b4 Rc8
If 10.Nh4, 10...e6 lt.Nxf:S Bxa3
W ru te was threatening 11 .b5.
12Nxg7+ Kd7 J3.Bxb6 Bxb2 is strong.
11...0 -0 -0? would be met w ith
10.~Ro6 ll.lk7 J2.Rxa6 bxa6 13.Bxa6 male. Here
If l l.Bc5, then ll ... b6. White has only one dangerous plan:
U .•.Kd7 l:Z.NbS e~ l3.8e2 NO-d2-b3-a5 and Black's b-pawn will
Better is 13.Bg3 Be7 l4.Ne5+. be difficult to defend. Blade bas two
t3...Be7 t4.Bdl RhoS 1S.a4 Na7 possible defens.es: to exchange the
= + , Legky-Cvetkovic, Vrnjaclca Knight with _.Be7-d8 or defend the
Banja 1989. pawn with t he Rook. The text move
may not be Black's best. Worth con-
sidering is 10 ...Rd8 ll.h3 Be7 12.Nd2
B) J •.•srs
NfB 13.Nb3 Ng6 14.Bh2 0.0 tS.NaS
B lack can unsuspectingly get
Rd7. The question ~ whether White
into danger with this move. could then successfully advance his
queenside pawns after a sacrifiCe on
a6 or c6. Otbetwise Blade would have
successfully solved his opening
problems, as ...Bd8xa5 could then fol·
low. See lllustrative Game 30.
4.c4
4.e3 e6 S.c4? Bxbl 6.Rxbl
(6.Qxbt Bb4 + ... +, Z. Nikolic-
Djukic, Nis 1981) 6...Bb4+ 7.Ke2
dxc4? 8.Qa4+ Ne6 9. Ne5 NdS
C) ~ ..• Bg4
4.NbdZ. e6 S.e3 Bd6
4 ...Qb6
4 .. .Bg4 5.c4 Nbc17 6.Nbd2 e6
7 .Bd3 NbS 8.Bg3 Nxg3 9.hxg3 Bd6
6.Bxd6 1O.Qb3 Rb8 Il.Nh2: Bb5 12.Nbfl
Nf6 13.13 Bg6 14.Bxg6 fxg6 15.g4
6.Bg3 0-0 7.c3 Ne4 8.Qb3 Nxg3
0-0 16.0-0-0 + =, Kovacevic-
9.hxg3 Nd7 10.e4 dxe4 ll.Nxe4 Bisguier, New Yo rk 1989.
Be7 12 .Bd3 Bf5 13.0-0 -0 Qc8
S.Qd BfS 6.e4 Na6 7.a3 Nb5
14.Q c2 h6 15.Nh4 Bxe4 16.Bxe4 8.c5 Qd8 9.Nbdl f6 10.b4 cs
Rd8 17. Qe2 c5 ""'• Kovacevic- 1 J.B&3 Nxg3 tl.hxlt3 Nc7 13.Qc3
Maotovaoi, Mendrisio 19S8. Kn 14.Bcl3 Qd7
6 ...Q xd6 7.c4 Nbd7 &.Qb3 RbS Equal> Hulak-Ku~igowski, Wijk
9.h3 BhS IO.cxdS ~xd5ll.Rd 0-0 aan Zee 1983.
n .Bd3 c6 13.0-0 Rfd l4.Nh4
Bg6 1S.Nq6 hq6 16.Rc3 a6 E) 3 ...c6
This position was reached in 4.e3 c5
Kovacevic- Timman, Indonesia a) For 4... Be7, see Illustrative
1983 . Wh i te s hould play Game3t.
17. Rfc l g5 18.Qd l =. Instead b) 4 ...Bd6
the game con tinued 17. Qc2?! bl ) 5.c3
g5 18 .Qdl g6 19.Qf3 Kg7 bll ) 5... Nbd7 6.B<II3 0-0 7.Nbd2
20.Rb1 Rh8 21.Nf1 Qe6 Re81! 8.NeS Nf8 9.Bg5 Be7 10.£4
22.Ng3 R h 4 = +. N6d7 1 t.Bxe7 Qxe7 12.0-0 f6
O.Nef3 eS1! 14.Qb3 c6 lS.fxeS
KbS 16.Rael fxe:S 17.e 4 + =,
D)3...e6
Sakovich-Varoa, USSR 1982.
4.e3 b l2) S...Bx£4 6.exf4 0-0 7.Nbd2
4.c3 ~6 5.b3 Bg7 6.Nbd2 0-0 Qd6 8.NeS c5 9.dxc5 Oxc5 10.Bd3
7.e3 Bf5 8.Be2 Nbd7 9 .Qb3 ~ Nc6 t 1.0-0 Qb6 12 .Rbl Qc7
10.g4 Be4 1 LRgl B:d'3 12.Bxf3 aS 13.Qe2 b6 14.Rfe1 + =, Stoppel-
l3.a4 eS 14.dxe5 NcS = +, Pribyl- Zobiscb, Austria 1982.
Yudasin, Leningrad 1989. b2) S.Bg3
65
b21) S...Ne4 6.Bd3 CS 7.Ne5 0 -0 17 .e4 +;:;. Knezevic- Cekro,
8J3 Nxg3 9.hxg3 BxeS IO.dxe5 Qg5 Sarajevo 1981.
1 J.Kf2 Nd7 12.f4 Qg6 13.g4 + =, 7.Be3
Augustio-Szilagyi, Stary Smokovec a) 7.Bd3 Bxf4 8.exf4 Qb6 9.Qb3
1976. cxd4 10.Qxb6 axb6 11.Nxd4 Nxd4
b22) 5 ... Nc6 6.c4 Bxg3 7.hxg.3 l2cxd4 Bd7 13.Ke2 Draw, Ro:r.en·
Qe7 8.Nc3 Bd7 9.a3 a6 10.Rcl dxc4 talis- Dreev, Tbilisi 1989.
Il.Bxc4 e5 12.d5 Na7 unclear. b) 7. Bxd6 Qxd6 8.Bb5 0 -0
Gulko-Kupreicbik, USSR 1982. 9.0-0 Bd7 10.Qa4 c.xd4 1 J.cxd4 a6
12.Bxc6 Bxc6 13.Qc2 Nd7 14.Rfcl
f6 IS .Nb3 Rac8 16.Na5 Qb4
17.Qd2 Qb6 18.a3 Rc7 19.Nxc6
bxc6 20.b4 Ra8 2J.Nel e5 =, Rubi-
netti-Morovic, Buenos Aires 1992.
7...0-0
a) 7... Qe7 8.Bb5 Bd7 9.0-0 0-0
10.Qa4 Bxg3 J t.hxg3 a6 12.Bxc6
Bxc6 13.Qa3 Nd7 14.Rfe1 Rfe8
15.e4 dxe4 16.Nxe4 cxd4 17.Qxe7
Rxe7 18.Nxd4 BdS 19.Nd2 Nb6
20.b3 Rd7 21.N2f'3 Rad8 =, Nik-
S.c3 Nc6 olic-Mo rovic.
Or imm ed iately 5 ... Bd6 b) 7 ... Bxg3 8.hxg3 Qd6 9.Qa4
6.Bb5+?! (6.Bg3 ) 6 ... Nc6 7.Qa4 cxd4 l0.exd4 Bd7 ll.BbS Nb8
Bxf4 8.exf4 Qb6 9.Nbd2 0-0 12.Ne5 a6 13.Bxd7+ Nfxd7 14.f4
lO.dxcS QxcS 11.0-0 Bd7 12.Bxc6 Nc6 15.Qc2 h6 16.Ndf3 NdxeS
bxc6 13.Qd4 Qe7 l 4.b4?! c5 ;:; + , J7.fxe5 Qe7 18.0-0-0 0-0-0 UO·
Seirawan-Aiburt, USA 1990. clear, Hulak- Kuijf, Wijlc aan Zee
6.Nbd~Bd6
1986.
a) 6 ... Qb6 7.Qbl (weak is tt8d3
7.Qb3?1 c4 8.Qxb6 axb6 9.h3 b5 8 .Ne5 c.xd4 9.exd4 B.lte5 IO.dxeS
tO.a3 b4 J l.cxb4 Bxb4 12.Rcl Be7 Nd7 l J.Nf3 NcS 12Be2 b6 13.Nd4
13.Be2 Nd7 14.0-0 Nb6 =+, Bd7 14.0 -0 fS 15.exf6 Qxf6
n ombik-D rasko. Prague 1984) 16.Bd6 Rf7 17.f4 Ne4 18. Nxc6
7 ...Be7 8.Bd3 Bd7 9.h3 Rc8 IO.a4 Bxc6 19.BeS Qb6 20.Rf3 g6 2t.Bd3
h6 li.NeS cxd4 12.exd 4 Nxe5 Qf8 22.Qe2 +=, Meduna-lnldov,
13.Bxe5 0-0 14 . 0~0 aS 15.Qc2 Gausdal 1988.
Ne8 16.R ae l Nd617.Re3 +=. 8 ...Qe7
Hulak-franzoni, Lucern Olympiad a) 8 ... b6 9.Ne5 Bb7 JO.f4 Ne7
1982. 1l.Of3 Ne8 t 2.Bh4 fS 13.g4 Nf6
b) 6...Be7 7.Ne5 0-0 8.Bd3 Bd7 J4.gxf5 NxfS 15.Qh3 Nx.h4 16.Qxb4
9.Q f3 Ne8 t O.Qh3 g6 11.Ndf3 Bxe5 17.fxe5 Ne4 un clear,
NxeS 12.Nxe5 f6 13.Nx.d7 Oxd7 Schumacbcr-Hoen, Lu cerne
14.0-0 c4 15.Bc2 Bd6 16.Bh6 Rf7 Olympiad 1982.
66
b) 8... Re8 9.Ne5 BxeS lO.dxeS 12.Nxd5 Rxd5 13.Bxc4 Ra514.Bxf7
Nd7 1l.f4 Ob6 ( White also has a Nxf4 l 5.exf4 with a large ad-
puwerful uttack 11.fter l l. ..c4 vantag~ to White.
12.Bc2 Qb6 13.Kf2 Qxb2 t4.Rcl t L.NxeS 12.BxeS Ng4
Qxa2 15.Qe2 CS 16.exf6 Nxf6 If J2 ... 8d6, then 1l.Bxf61 !Ptf6
17.Bh4 RfB l8.8xf6 Rxf6 19.Nf'3 14.Nxd5 RxdS l 5.Bxc4 gives White
Qa3 20.Bxb7 + in Burn-Marshall, a large advantage.
O~tend 1906) 12.Qb 1 Nf8 13.Bf2
13.8g3 8d6 14. Bx:d6 Kxd6
c4 t4.Bc2 Qc7 l5.Jilf3 b5 I 6.a3 a5
11.0-0 Bd7 18.Ng5 b6? (18._g6) 15.Nb5! RxbS 16.b4
19.Bh7 + 1-0, M:aroc;zy- M ar- napping the Rook amd t hreaten·
tinolich, Vienna 1907. ing to win it with 17.a4.
J6...Bd7
lb me~t 17.a4with 17... Ra8.
17. Be2 Nr6 18.13 Ra8 19.Kd2?
Care )e.'l~ly allowing Black's next
move. Qm~t is 19.a4. Then the
only move is 19... N.e4. After
20.1f:xe4 dxe4 21.0-0 RfS White
has a slight advtlntage.
Game 29
llluslrati~
19.•.Ra3 20.Kc2 Rxb4l 21.cxb4
FM Aaron Summet'S(ale R.xe3
Black has a very larg.e advantage
GM Loek van Wely due to the weaknesses in White's ·
Lond011 1992
position.
l .NtJ dS 2.d4 Nf6 3.Bf4 c.5 4.e3 22.Kd2 Ra3 23.Rhcl Ng8!
c:6 S.cJ Qb6 6.Qb3 c:4 7.Qxb6 Repositioning the Knight to fS
axb6 8.Na3 tS?! or c6.
Better is 8 ...e6 o r 8 ...Ra5. 24.Rc:3 Ra8 2S.a3 Ne7 26.Rc:2
9.Nb5 RaS 10. Nc7 + Kd7 Ba4 27.Rccl NfS 2:S.Kc3 Re8
ll.NxeS + 29.Ra2 Re3 + 30.Kd2 Rb3
Also possible is 11.dxe5 Nh5 31.Kel b5 Jl.Bdl Rd3 33.Be2
67
Rxd4 34 . g 3 g5 3 S . Kfl Ne7 If l4... Bc7, then 15.Bxc7 Rxc7
36.Ke.3 Nc6 37.Rd fS 38.KJ2 f4 16.b5! cxb5 17.NxbS or if 14 ... Bc7,
39.80 NeS 40.Kg2 c3 41.Rae2 then IS.Bh2 Bd8 t6.Na5.
Rd2 42.Rcl d4 0-1 1S.Nxe4 Bxe4 16.f3 Bg6 17.NaS
BxaS 18.bxa5 Kd8
The King must be used to defend
Jllu.Jtrative Game 30 the b-pawn.
GM Predrag NikoJic 19.Ra4 Ra8 21).Rb4 Kc:8 21.h4!
IM Jeroen Pikel W hile Black is tied down on the
J~jk aan Zcc 1988 quecnside, White begins play on
the o ther wing. Nikolic conducts
l .d4 dS l .NfJ Nf6 3.Bf4 BfS
the endgame quite nicely.
4.c4 cCI S.eJ e6 6. c3 N bd7
7 .Qb3 Qb6 8.cS Qxb3 9.axb3 a6
10. b4 Rc.S - ~·~
w~jt<"~~ 0".# · ~'" ~
~~h~e-: ;at
As mentioned earlier, 10...Rd8 is ~ :l: ~~ . w.~~ :l: ·I~
perhaps better. ·t:~~-:ilifi·~j:r·~
~ rt~~?« ~ . ~ ~~J.t~i
r)l~~/~i~1 ~~~,~~
ll.h3
If im mediate ly ll. Nb3 , t hen
~~7~~~~~·.,f.~,~~~a;;
11 ...Nh5.
11.-h6?
Allowing the Bishop to retreat
[o •J.
~d~
~ trJ.
.ft""~
1
;(
to h7, but actually carelessly losing
a va iuable te mpo . Kovacevic- ~ ~ ~A.w~ f!
Byrne, Wijk aan Zee 1980, con· 2l. ..h5 22.Rh3 BfS 23.Rg3 g6
tinued 11...Be7 12.Nd2 Q . Q 13.g4
24.Kd2 Re8
Bg6 14. Nb3 R a8?! ( Bette r is
A much bette r defense is
l4... Bd8. White's be st then would
24... Rg8 followed by ... Nf6-e8-c7-
be 15.Bd6 and later Na5. Black
b5.
could meet an immediate 1S.Na5
witb t 5...1\xa5 J6.bxa5 Ne8 17.Ra4 2S. RgS f6?
Nc7 t 8.Rb4 NbS.) l S.NaS Ra7 Serious ly weaken ing the g6·
16.£3 Rc8 17.Kd2 b6 18.Bxa61 Rxa6 pawn. Correct is 25...Rg8.
19.Nxc6 Rxc6 2 0.Rxa6 Rc8 l6.Rg3 gS 27.Bd3!
2J.Rhal bxc5 22.Ra8 Rf8 23.bxc5 No t 27.hxg5? h4.
and White's passed pawns brought l7...g4
him victory. If 27 ... gxh4, t hen 28.Rg7 b3
U .Ndl Be7 13.Nb3 Bd8 29.gxh3 Bxh3 30.Rb7 is winning for
To defe nd against Na5. White.
J4.8d6! 28.e4 dxe4
This move would would have had If 28... Bg6, then 29.cxt1S Bxd3
much less ·e ffect had Black p layed 30.dxc6 wins.
11 ... &7. 29.fxe4 Bg6 30.Bc2 fS 31.eS Rg8
l4...Ne4 32.Rgb3 R a7 33.Bd3
68
•
S.c3
This is more precise th11n 5.c4 as
t hen Black has the option ott rymg
.s....~:
a) 6.exd5?! Nxd5 7.c3 h6 8.Bh4 No~ we ex~mjn~ .~l~·~~6•..B).
Nd7 9.Bc4 (9. Bg:3~) 9 ... N7b6 6••.h6, ·-c> o...c5, D) 6 ...Nbd7.
1O.Bb3 £5 ll .Qe2 gS 12.Bxg5 hxg5 . .Altem a·ii.veiire: · .::-_ .:.-
... -
~--- '
13.Nxg5 e6 14.Nxe6 Bxe6 · ·· a) 6... Na6 7.8e2 c:5 8.0-0 Nc7 ·.
l5.Qxe6+ Kh7 '16.0-0-0 Qh4 9.dxc5 dxcS 10.Qc2 Ne6 l t.Bh4 1
'
17.g3 Qh3 t8.Qe2 c6 t9.Nf3 Qg4 · N'f4 12.Bc4 Qd7 13.a4 N<ib5
.20.Bc2 RaeS 21.Qd3 Ne3 =+, 14.Rfe l Qg4 15.Bg3 e5 16.R adl
Pla to nov-Gutman , Reykjavik Qd7 17.Nf1 Qc7 118.Ne3 +.,,
1978. Kasparov-McNab, World Junior
b) 6.e5 Ne4 7.Bd3 (7.Be3 cS 8.c3 -..c;hampionsbip, Dortmund 1980.
Nc6 9.dxc5 ? ! Oc7 10.Bd3 B£5
-· -
b) 6 ... Nfd7 7.Be2 c5 8.d5 Nf6
1 LQc2 Nxd2 12.Qxd2 Be4 =+, 9.0 ·0 Nbd7 IO.a4 b6 11.Qc2 a6
Trifuoovic-K. Georgiev, Kraguje- l2.Rfel Rb8 13.c4 + =, Levitina-
71
Abhyanlcar, Thessalooiki Olym- 7.8b5
piad 1988. 7.Bd3 eS 8.b3 Qe8 9.0· 0 h6
c) 6...c6 7.Bd3 Nbd7 8.0·0 eS 10..&3 b6 1LRe l Nb5 12.Nc4 Nf4
9.Rel Qc7 10.a4 ReS 11.Nc4 Nf8 13.Bft g5 J4.a4 a5 15.Qd2 + ""• D.
12.dxeS dxeS 13.Bf1 .Bg4 J4.h3 Gurevich- E agle, U.S. Open 1988.
Rad8 lS.Qe2 Bc8 16.aS + ~ . Bot- 7 ...a6
tema-Van Wely, Dieren 1988. a ) 7... Bd7 8 .Qe2 b6 9.Bh4 a6
d) 6 ... b6 7. Bc4 Bb7 8.Qe2 c5 JO.Bc4 eS ll.dxeS Nxe5 12.Nxe5
9.dlCc5 bxcS 10.0 -0 Nc6 1l.Ba6 dxe5 13.0-0 aS 14.Rrdt Qe7 l 5.o4
Qb6 12.8xb 7 Qxb7 13.Nc4 Nd7 Rfd8 16.£3 Be6 17. Bxe6 Qxe6
14.Rfel Rab8 15.Rac l Qa6 16.b3 18. Nc4 += , Z huravliov-Wojt.
Qb717.h4 +=. SzjJy-Upray, Hun- lciewicl, Latvia 1980.
garian Ch<~ mpionship 1965. b) 7... h6 8.Bh4 a6 9.Ba4 bS
e) 6 ...e5 7.dxe5 dxe5 8.Nxe5 Qe8 JO.Bc2 Nd7 1 J.0-0 Rb8 t2.Re l
9.Bxf6 Bxf6 10.Nef3 Nd7 l l.Bc4 Qe8 13 .a4 b4 14.a5 Na7 J5. Nc4
Nc5 12.0e2 Rb8 J3.Qe3 Qe7 bxc J 16. bxc3 NbS unclear , Gi-
14.0 -0 b5 15. BdS Bd7 16.Rfel fuentes-Douvcn, Wijk aan Zee
+ • . Petrosian- Bronstein, Moscow 1988.
1983.
t) 6... Qe8
fl ) 7.Bd.'\ Nc6 8.0 ·0 eS 9.Re1 h6
10.Bh4 Nh5 to.dxe5 Nxe 5 ll.Nxe5
dxe5 + .. , Torre-Romonishin ,
Leningrad 1987.
f2) 7.Bc4 eS 8.dxe5 dxe5 9 .a4
Nh5 10.0 -0 Nd7 I l.Rel NcS
J2.Be3 Qe7 t3.b4 Ne6 14.a5 a6
15.Qc2 + s , Kortchno i-Gutman.
Wijk aan Zee 1987.
fl ) 7.Be2
f31) 7 ... Nc6 8.0-0 e5 9.dxe5 8.Bn4 Bd7 9.0 -0 h6 lO.Bh4 Qe8
dxe5 10.Qc2 Nd8 I 1.Bb4 Nh5 lt .eS NhS
12. Rfel Ne6 13 .Nc4 Nr4 14.Bfl 11... Nxd4 ? 12.cxd4 Bxa4 13.b3
+ =, Salov-Romanishin, Lenin- +-.
grad 1987. ll.Rel d5 13.Bcl Nd8 l4.Nfl
f32) 7._h6 8.Bh4 Nh5 9.0 -0 N£4 Ne6 IS.Ne3 c6 16.Bg3 Nxa3
10.Bc4 e5 ll.Rel Nc61 2.dxe5 dxe5 17.hxg3 Qd8 U.Nh4 Qb6 19.Rbl
13.Qc2 Kh8 14.Rad 1 f5 l S.Bg3 lP NgS 20.f4 Ne4 :u .Bxe4 dxe4
16.Bxf4 exf4 l7.exf5 Bxf5 18.Bd3 n .Qc2
Bxd3 l9.Qxd..l Qf7 20.Qb5 Rab8 With a large advantage to White,
21.Nc4 a6 22.QdS Qxd5 Draw, Darga-Ciocaltea, Siegen Olympiad
Episbio-Van Wely, Bern 1993. 1970.
b) 9...Qc7 IO.Qc2
b 1) I 0 ... Be6 I LBc4 Bxc4
IO.Rd eS ll .dxeS dxeS U .Rel
12.Nxc4 b5 J3.Ne3 e6 14.a4 a6
Qe8 1J.a4 Nh5 14.Nb3 gS lS.BeJ JS.Rfd l c4 =, G lyanets-Timosh-
Rd8 16.Nfd2 NxgJ cbe oko, USSR ~1988. ·· - · - ..
If t 6 .•.Nf4, then 17.f3 h5 t8.Bf2. ~ bi) IO-:.b6 Tl.Bb4- Nh5 t2.Ret
17.hxcJ Kh8 U ..Qd Qe7 19.Nn Be6 13.Bfl ?! ( 13.Bc4 =) 13...Rad8
Qf6 20.Nc5 Bc8 21.Ne3 Ne7 U.aSI ~9ig_~cr-:Y_u_r~~:~:--~-~-rnqu~-
Qc6 23.84 b6 z.a.Nrs
Black has weaknesses oo both 8 ... Nc6
sides of the board, Smyslov- Nuon, 8 ... h6 9.Bh4 Nc6 10.0 ·0 Bg4
Tilburg 1982. The game continued 11.Qc2 gS 12. Bg3 N'bS 13. R fe l
2.4 ...Nxrs 25.gdS Qc6 26.Nxa6 Nx:g3 14.hxg3 e6 15.a4 Qc7 16.Be.2
BbS ~ . Kortchnoi-L. H ansen,
Bxa6 l7.Bxa6 bxa5 28.Rxa5 Ra8
Jerusalem 1986.
Z.9.Real Rfd8 30. Bc4 RxaS
9.0 -0
J.l.RxaS Kc8 32.Ra6 Qd7 33.BdS
9.0e2 h6 10.Be3 b6 l t.h3 Na5
Qe7 34.Qb5 Rd6 3S.Rxd6 cxd6
12. Bd3 Qc7 l3.Kh2 Rd8 14.&2
36.b41·0. No6 15.0-0 Nh5 16. Bb3 Nf4 =,
Trifunovic- Smyslov, D ortmund
C) 6....cS 1961 .
73
a) 7.Bc4
al) For 7 ... e5, see lllustrative
G ame 33 and 34.
a2) 7 ... c6
a21)8.Bb3 b5 9.0 -0 Nb6 lO.Re l
Q c7 1I.Rcl a5 12.a3 Ba6 13.c5?!
NfdS 14.exd6 exd6 JS.NfJ Nc4 =,
Gulko-We.ste rinen, Moscow 1966.
1122) 8 .0 -0 Nxe4 9.Nxe4 dS
JO.Bd3 dxe4 l t.Bxe4 N£6 12.Bd3
Bg4 13. h3 +=, Malaniuk-
Gurevich, USSR 1980.
9."Na5 a3) 7... h6 &.Bh4 c6
a) 9... Bg4 10.b3 Bxf3 1l.Q:d'3 h6 a31) 9.0-0 e5 10 .dxe5 dxe5
12.Be3 Qc7 13.Qe2 Rad8 14.f4 ) l.a4 aS 12.Qc2 0c7 13. Ne l Nc5
Na5 15.Bd3 Nh5 t 6.Rf3 e5 17.f5 14.f3 b5 IS.axb5 cxbS J6.Be2 Bd7
Qd6 J8.Bc4 with a large ad va ntage 17.Bf2 Ne6 18.g3 Rfe8 =+.
to White, Tri f unovic-Udovcic, Dtik_iki-Chandler, Luce'roe Olym-
Yugoslavia 1956. piad 1984.
b) 9 ... Q c7 tO.Qc2 b6 l i.R fe l a3 2) 9. Bb3 Oc7 10.0 -0 cS
Nh5 12.Radl Bb7 l3.Bfl RadB =. l l.dxcS dxcS 12.Qc2 NcS? 13. Bxf6
Klnderman n- Nun n. Zurich 19B4. Bxf6 14.0e3 Nxb3 15. uxb3 and
IO.Be2 h6 White wins a puwn, Nun- Stohl,
For I 0 ... Be6, see Jllu ~ tr ative Stary Smokovec 1983.
Game32. b) 7.Bd3 eS 8.0-0
ll .Bf4 Be6 12.h3 a6 l3.a4 b6 bl} 8. .. Qe8 9.dxe5 dxe.S JO.b4 h6
t4.NeS Qc8 1 1.Bh4 NhS =. M acbulsky- Cvitan,
With equ ality, Malani uk- Yur- Sibenik 19&7.
taev, USSR 1986. b2) 8 ... h6 9.Bh4 Qe7 tO.Rel Nb6
ll.Nfl Re8 12.Ne3 QfB 13.Qc2
D ) 6-.Nbd7 Bd7 14.a4 a5 =. Kamsky-Cvitan,
Palma de M allorca 1989.
7 ... h6
7...e5 8.dxe5 dxe5 9.0-0
a ) Fo r 9 ... b6, see IIIU!arative
Game 35.
b) 9... c6 t 0.Qc2 Q c7 ll.R fel
Re812.Bfl b613.a4 aS 14.Nc4 Bb7
15.Radl Re6 16.Bxf6 Nxf6 17.Ng5
Re7 18.Nd6 Ba6?! !9.Bxa6 Rxa6
20. Qb3 h6 2t .Ndxf7 Rxf7 22.Rd8 !-
with a large advantage, Epish in-
Ka ntsler, USSR 1989.
7.Be2 c) For 9... Qe8, see Tllos trative
74
Game36. U.Rd
8.Bb4 e5 ll .Qc2 Nh S 12.Rfel N£4 13.Bf1
8... Nb5 9.0-0 Nf4 10.Bc4 c6 aS l4.a4 NcS 15.Nc4 Bd7 16.b3
l l.Rel Nb6 12.Bft Qc7 13.a4 aS Qe6 17.Nld2 B£6 18.Bg3 +•,
14.eS Be6 15.h3 NhS 16.Ne4 Bd5 Averkin- D idyshko, USSR Cham-
l7.Qcl f5 =, Rubioetti-Graoda pionship 1981.
Zuoiga, Buenos Aires 1992. ll ... NhS
9.dxe5 l l ...Nc5 12.0c2 NhS t3.Nc4 Nf4
Abo good is 9.0-0 : t4.Bf1 Bg4 15.b47! (15.Nfd2 +=)
15 ... Bxf3 16.bxcS Bg4 • +,
1) 9...Re8 10.Qc2 gS (weakening Petunso n- Pliester, London 1980.
the f5 square) ll.Bg3 NbS 12.Nc4
Nf4 13.dxe5 Nxe5 ( 13 ... dxe5 ll.Nc4 Nf4 13.811 Nd 14.b4
14.Ne3 N£6 15.Bc4) 14.Nfxe5 Bxe5 Na4
(14...dxe5 1S.Ne3 followed by Bg4) Cifuentes-Rubinetti, Pan
lS.Radl Qe7 16.Ne3 Be6 17.Bg41 American Championship 1981 ,
Bg7 18.0 aS 19.Bf2 a4 20.Nf5 with continued 15.Qc2 Nb6 16.Na5 gS
a large advantage to Wh ite be- 17.Bg3 Qe7 18.Nd2: hS 19.£3 g4
cause of the domination of the £5- 20.fxg4 hxg4 21.Ndc4 Qg5 22.Ne3
square, Balashov-Vukic, Bugojno +•.
1978.
b) 9...Qe8 IO.Rel Nh5 ll.a4 aS fllustTQ/ive Game 32
12.Nc4 exd4 13.Nx;d4 Nf4 14.Bfl GM Vladimir Malamiuk
Ne5 l 5.Ne3 c6 16.Qd2 +::o ,
IM Mihai Marin
Rodriguez- Damljanovic, New Calirnanesli 1992
York Open 1988.
9...d xe5 10.0 -0 Qe8 t.d4 Nf6 2 .Nf3 g6 3 .BgS Bg7
IO...Qe7 11.Rel RdB 12.Qc2 b6 4. Nbd2 0·0 S.c3 d6 6.e4 eS
13.8£1 Bb7 14.Nc4 Qe6 15.Nfd2 7.dxc5 dxc5 8.Bc4 Nc6 9.0·0
Qg4 16.Bxf6! Bxf6 17.Ne3 Qe6 NaS 10.Be2 Be6 1l.Rel a6
1S.Bc4 Qd6 19. Rad 1 + =, 12.Qc2
Balashov-Sax, Rio de Janeiro ln- 12.a4? ! prevent:s ... bS b ut
terronal 1979. weakens the b3·square.
12... bS 13.Nb3 Nxb3 14.axb3
Qt7 1S. Bh4 h6 t6.N d2 Qb6
17 .Nn Rfd8 18. Ne3 Ra7
1'9 .Redl Rad7 20.Rxd7 Rxd7
21.c4?!
This weakens the lll4-square and
the b8-a 1 diagonal.
2J ...Rd4?
The Rook is exposed here. Bet·
ter is 2 t...Nb 7 followed by •.. Bd4.
22.f3
75
With the idea of playin~ Bf2 fol- lllultrarive GQ/rle 33
lowed by NdS. GM Tigraa Petrosiaa
22...Rd7 23.Bfl NbS 24.&) Bd4 GM VlastimiJ Jansa
2S.f4 bxc4 26.Bxc4 ?! Bor J98(}
Correct is 26..£5! with a slight ad-
vantage to White. ·J.d4 Nl'6 2.Nf3 g6 3.Bg5 8&7.
26...Bxc4 27.Qxc4 aS 4.Nbd2 d6 S.e4 0-0 6.c3 Nbd7
Black has a larae advantage be-
7.Bc4 e5 8.dxe5 dxeS 9.0-0 h6
cause the B ishop i~ very powerful 9 ...Qe7 IO.Rel Nc5 l l.Bb4 Bd7
on d4 and White's pawns are weak- 12.a4 a6 13.a5 bS 14.axb6 cxb6
JS.Bd5 RaeS 16.Nc4 +=, Espig-
28.Qc2 Hazai, Leipzig 1983.
If 28.Nd5, then 28...Qd8. tO.Bh4 Qe8 ll.Rel NhS 12.a4
28 ... Nf6 29.eS NdS 3 0 . Nc4 Bl'6
Bxfl+ 3t.Kxn Qe6 Wor th considering is 12... a5.
Now Whi te gains space o n the
queenside.
13.a5 Qe7 t4.Bxf6 Qxf6 lS.Bn
Rd8 16.Qe2 Nr4 l7.Qe3 gS
This weakens tbe fS-square. But
White was planning to play g3 fol -
lowed by Nc4, tying Black down to
the e5-pawn.
J8.Redl Re8 l9.g3 Ng6 20.h3
Nd£8 2l.Nh2 bS?
Weakening the lc ing.~ide. Better
is 21 ...Be6.
Now Black directs his attack at
the exposed White King. 22.Be2
Fo rc ing Black to abandon the
32.Qe2 Nb4 33.Kgl g4-square.
lf 33.Rxa5, then 33 ... Nd3 + 22.•. b4 l3.Bg4 Kc7 24.Nd0
34.Kg1 Ncl 35.Qf3 Rd3 is strong.
33 ...Nc6 34.Qe3
If 34.Nxa5, then 34...Ra7 35.Qb5
QdS wios.
34•••Nd4 35.Rxa5
lf 35.Rdl, then 35...a4.
3S...Qc6 36.h3
I£ 36.Nd2, the o 36 ... Nxb3
37.Nxb3 Rd 1+ 38.Kf2 Qh 1 wins.
36 ... Nf5 37.Qel Rd3 38.Kh2.
Rx&J 39.Qf2 Rxh3 + 0-1
76
Wb ite maneuvers bis Knights The Knights are superior to the
towards the weaknesses at g4 and f5. Bishops in this position. Black will
24 ••• Nh7 2S.Rd3 Be6 26. Bxe6 have trouble defending ber weak-
Qxe' 17.Ng4 N... nesses.
Otherwise W hite plays Qf3 and
Nfl-e3-f5. 19... f6 2-0.Real Rf7 21.Rdl Rd7
22. Rxd7 Bxd7 23.Nfd2 Bf8
28.Qxgs Nxe4 2!J.Qh6 + Kg8
3 0 . Radl Nf6 3l.Nfe3 Nxg4 24.Nb3 Be6 2S.Ne3 Qc7 26.Nc5
32.Nxg4 bxg3 33.Rxg3 Rad8 817 27.Qa4 hS 28 .N f5 Kh7
34.Rd QfS 35.h4 Re6 36.bS 29 . Ra6 B:rcS 3 0 . bx c5 Be8
Q£4 37.bxg6 1..0 li.N d6 Bd7 32.Qa2 Rf8
33.Rxa7 Qd8 34.Qe6 1-0
Illustrative Game 34 White used only 59 m inute.~ in
GM Vasily Smyslo... t his g a me compared with h is
IM Ketevan ArakJuimla opponent's 1 hour and 59 minutes.
Vienna 1993
11/usJralive Game 36
(·N,;fiii~"- l)yct<:.~/{ov
., GM Yuri Balasho'V \
--~- ·- · - ---.__) Minsk 1993
2S...Rc7
Of course 2S...bxc4 26.Bxc4 wins
the Knight OD d7.
26.Nd6 Rb8 27.axbS cxbS
This leaves the a6-pawn weak, 20... Nf6 21.Nec4
but worse is 27.axb5 28.Ra7 fol· If 21.eJCf5, the n 21...gxfS 22.Nxf5
towed by NaS. Q hS is unclear. The text is simpler.
28. Nxb7 Rbxb7 29.Qa2 N b8 Now Black loses because of all the
30.Na5 Qxa2 31.Rxa2 Ra7 weaknesses in his position.
If 31...Rd7, then 32.RdS. 21.•. Nxe4 2l.Nxe4 f'xe4 23.Nd6
32.c6 Ra8 3 3 .Rc2 B x b4 Qb8 24.Be7 NdJ 25.Bxd3 exd3
34 . Rd8 + Kg7 3 5.Bb6 BxaS 26.Qxd3 Rf4 27.Qxg6 Bg4 l8.f3
78
Qa7 + l9.Khl b6 30.rxg4 Qxe7
3 I. Nrs Q g S 32.Qx c:6 Rrs
3 3.Rd7 R4xfS 34 .&xf5 Q:xfS
l.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.8 gS Bg7
3 S.Qc4+ Kh8 3, .Rddl QbS
.N bd2 d ~--- ----- ·-.
3 7. Qe2 Qb4 3 8 .Rn Q x b4
3 9.Rxf8 + Q xr8 40.QbS Qb8
4l .a5 Qc8 42.u b6 Qcl 43.Qbl
1.0
Coadusion: After l .d4 Nf6
2.Nf3 g6 3.Bg5 Bg7 4.Nbd2 0 -0
S.c3 d6 6.e4, all the main moves
considered have been popular, but
6 ...c5 may be worth a second l ook.
Al) 8...e6
This is the most flexible move,
81
9-.Nc:6 l O.Bel Qe7 JO.a4 e4 lJ.Ne l Nb7 12.Nc2 f5
10.. .£5? tl .exfS exfS 12.Ne5! 13.f3 Ndf6 14.Bxf6 Nxf6 l.S.fxe4
11.0-0-0 a5 l l .a4 Bd7 lJ.dS fxe4 l6.a5 c6 17.Qe l d5 -= +,
Nd8 Kovacevic-G ligo ric, Yugoslavia
Now witb 14.Nd4 White would 1979.
h ave the better placed pieces. a2) 7.0.0 eS 8.Bh4 Re8 9.c4 b6
Balashov- Torre, Manila Jnterzon al t O.R c t h6 11.h3 Bb7 12.d5 aS
1976 continued with the weaker 13.b3 Nc5 14.a3 g.S l .S.Bg3 c6 16.b4
14.h4?! Nxg3 1S.fxg3 g4 16.Nd4 hS axb4 17.axb4 Nce4 unclear, Rong-
17.Nc4 0-0 t8.Bd3 unclear. guang Ye- D reev, Manila 1990.
b) 6.Bc4 NbC7 7.0-0 eS (7... h6
I ~ 5.e3 • 8. Bh4 e.S 9.c3 Qe7 10.a4 aS 11.Qe2
5...o:O e4 12.Net g5 t3.Bg3 Nb6 14.Bb3
5wh6 6.Bb4 gS 7.Bg3 NhS and: Bg4 15.f3 exf3 I 6.Nexf3 Rae8
a) 8.Be2 0-0 9.c3 Bf5?1 10.0 -0 17. Rfel Bd7 18.e4 Nh5 =,
Bg6 ll.Nell Nxg3 12.hxg3 Nd7 K ovacevic-Smejkal, Yugos lavia
1978) 8 .dxe5 dxe5 9. Ne4 Qe8
13.Bd3 Bxd3 14.Nxd3 c5 1S.Qb3
CX7 16.a4 Rac8 17.dxc5 + "", Lar- 10.Nxf6+ Bxf6 ll.e4 Qe7 t2.Bxf6
seo-Haik, Lanzarote 1976. Nxf6 13.Qe2 BeiS •, Orec:v-Khalif-
man, Vilnius 1988.
b) 8.c3 e6 (8... Nxg3?! 9.hxg3 Nd7
10.a4! Nf6 ll.aS Bd7 12.Bd3 e6 c) 6.c3
13.e4 g4 14.Nb2 bS lS.Nfl Bh6 cl ) 6 ... b6 7.Bd3 c5 8.b4 cxb4
16.Qe2 eS 17.d5 c6 18 .c4 cS 9.cxb4 Nc6 10.a3 Bb7 J 1.0-0 Qd7
J 9. Ne3! + =.RihH-Adorjao , 12.Qe2 R fc8 13.Rac1 Nd8 14.Bb5
Budapest 1981 ) 9.Bd3 Q e7 JO.Qe2 Bc6'! 15.Rxc6 Nxc6 16.Bxf6 Bxf6
Nc6 1 L Nb3 Bt17 12. Nfd2 Nxg3 17.dS +-, Keres-Saidy, Tel Aviv
13. hx&3 0·0-0 14.Nc4 Kb8 Olympiad 1964.
15.0-0-0 + =, Kovacevic-Ree, c2) 6... Nbd7 7.a4 h6 8.Bxf6 Bxf6
Plovdiv 1983. 9.a.5 a6 IO.Qc2 eS?! (10 ... Bg7)
11.Bc4 Kb8 12.b4 bS? 13.Ne4 Bg7?
J4.Neg5 witb a large advantage to
While, Petrosian-Ribli , Amster-
dam 1973.
d ) 6.a4 Nbd7 7.a5 a6 8 .c3 e5
9.Be2 b6 JO.Bxf6 Qxf611.0-0 Qe7
12.dxe5 NxeS (Shirazi-Scbussler,
H aifa Olympiad 1976) 13.Nxe5
QxeS I 4.Bg4 Bxg4 15.Qxg4 + =.
e) 6.b4
bl ) 6 ... Nbd77.Be2 ReS 8.0-0 e5
9.c3 c6 10.Q b3 aS l l.a3 h6 12 .Bh4
6.8 d3 e 4 13.Ne t a4 14.Qd1 gS 1S.Bg3 b5
a) 6.Bc2 Nbd7 ond now: =. Torre-Ftacnik, Lugano 1988.
at ) 7.c3 eS 8.0·0 h6 9.Bh4 Qe8 b2) 6 ... Bg4 7.Be2 Nbd7 8.h 3 Bx£'3
9. Bxf3 c6 10.0 A0 e5 ll.c3 a5 12.b5 10.Q c2 Nh7, I l.e4 wiU s till be
Qb6 13.bxc6 bxc6 14.Rbl Qa7 necessary. Thimauov-hnsu, Hur-
15.Qa4 Rfc8 16.Rb2 +=, Torre- rachov 1966, continued ll ... N~rll
Zuger, Biel 1988. 12.dxe5 dxeS 13.Nc4 NhS 14.Ne3
,,..Nbd7 . Bf6 =.
Nf4 15.Bc4
6... Nc6 7.0~0 h6 8.Bh4 g5 9.Bg3
NhS 10.c3 e6 11.e4 £:5 12.ex.f5 exfS
13.Qb3 Kh8 14.b3 Bd7 1S.Nc4 RbS 11/ustlfltm Gume 37
=, Kbalifman-Wa tson, Moscow GM Valery Salov
1985. NM Ilia Smirin
7.0-0 USSR Championship 1988
7.Qe2 h6 8.Bxf6 Nxf6 9.h3?! e5!
l O.dxe5 dxe5 11.0· 0 ·0 Qe7 12.e4
(12.0-0 Bg4 13.h3 • ) 12... a5 • +,
l.d4 Nf6 l.Nf3 c'
3.BgS d6
4.Nbdl Nbd7 S.e4 h~ 6.Bh4 g5
Kamsky-YeTmolinsky, USSR 1987.
7.Bg3 NhS 8.Nc4 Bt7 9.c3 e6
7...h,
lO.Nfdl Nx1J ll.hx¥3 Qe7
7... b6 and:
U . NeJ Nf6 13.Qb3!
a) &Rel cS 9.c3 Bb7 10.a4 Qc7
ll.aS eS I2.e 4 (1!2.dxe5 dxeS Tying the Bishop to b7. Not as
13.e4"'") l 2 ... c~d4 13.a6?! dxc3 st rong is 13.f4 gxf4 114.gxf4 Bd7
14.Rcl 8c6 15.R.xc3l'lc5 16.Bfl Qd7 15.Bd3 0-0-0 16.Qf3 KbS
17.b4 Ne6 J8.Bxf6 Bxf6 t9.Nc4 Rfd8 17.0-0-0 eS 18.fxe5 dxeS 19.d5 bS
20.Rd3 Qc7 = +, Dreev-Kir. Oeor- =, Balashov- Tseshkovslty, USSR
giev, Moscow 1985. 1975.
b) ttc3 Bb7 9- 0~2 b6 I O.Bb4 13...c6 14.0·0·0 tS?!
Qc8 11.e 4 e5 12.dxe5 dxeS 13.Rfel
ReS 14.b4 NhS 15.Qdt B£6 16.Bxf6 This opens lines and weakens
Nbxf6 17.Nc4 Qd8 18.Qc2 Qe7 the f~square. Better u 14...dS.
Draw, Thrre-Nunn, Tilburg 1982. 15.dxe5 dxe5 16.Ndc4 Be6
U J6... Nxe4, then 17.Qc2 N£6
18.Nd6+ Kf8 19.Bc4 Be6 20.Nef5
is strong.
17.Nl'S BxfS 18.Nd6+ Qxd6!
Black's only chance i.s to sacrifice
his Queen . 18... Kf8 19.Nxf5 is
hopeless.
19 .Rxd6 Nxe4 20 .Qxb7 0-0
21.Rdxb6 Nxf2 22.Qe7 Rad8
23.Bel xh l 24.Rxhl Be6
8.8h4 eS 9.c3 Qe8 2S.QxgS Bxa2 26.Rh4
Better t.han 9 ... Re8?! IO.Qc2 Not 26.c4? Rd4. Bwt now 27.c4
Oe7 ll.e4 +=. Afte r 9 ... Qe8 i.s threatened.
~ -- .
6.e3 Nbd7
a) 6 ...c5 7.dxc5 and now:
at) 7 ...Bg4 &.&2 Q c7 9.b4 b6
10.cxb6 axb6 ll.Qb3 Rc8 12.Nd4
Bd7 J3 .c4 Nc6 14 .Nxc6 Bxc6
15.R ct Qa7 t6.Bxf6 Bxf6 17.cxd5
Bb5 l&.Rxc8 Rxc8 19.Bxb5 Rcl
20.J<el RxhJ 2l.Nf1 + =, Lputian-
9... Nid7 Khalifman, Kiev 1986.
a) 9-.Nbd7 10.f4 + ""· a2) 7 ...Qc7 S.Nb3 (8.b4) 8 ... Ne4
b) 9 ... Ne4 IO. Nxe4 dxe4 1 t.Bc4 9.Be2 Nxg5 lO.NxgS e6 tl.Qc2
+ = and now if 11...b5? 12.Qb3 +- Nd7 12.c4? Oe5 t 3 . N f3 Qxb2
o r tt...cxd4 t2cxd4 Nd7 l3.Nxt7 14.Rcl Nxc5 and Black was much
Rxf7 14.Qb3 Qe8 15.Rac1 with a better, Smyslov-Watso n, New Yorlc
large advantage. 1987.
10.Nxd7 b) 6 ... b6 7.b4. Now 7... Nbd7
IO.Ng4 £6 ll.Bh6 B.xh6 transposes back into the main
12. Nxh6+ J<g7 13.Nf5 + gxf5 vanauoo. Dubious is 7 ... c5 71
J4.Bxf5 Qe8 15.Qg4 + Kh8 16.Qh3 8.bxc5 bxcS 9.Qa4 + =. Hug- Lutz,
Rf7 17.B g6 uncl ea r, C ve tko v- San Bem3rdin o 1988. continued
88
9 ... Ne4 10.Nxe4 d1(e4 1l .Nd2 BfS Dorfman, Lvov 1988.
(also possible is 1L .h6 12.Bh4 f5) b) 7.Bd3
l2Be2 h6 l3.Bh4 Nd7 14.0-0 gS bl ) 7...Re8 and now:
l5.Bg3 Bg6 J6.Ra b1 cxd4 17.cJ~d4 bll ) 8.e4 dxe4 9'. Nxe4 Nxe4
eS 18.dxe5 NxeS 19.Rfd I Qd7 t 0.Bxe4 c5 11.0 -0 cxd4 12cxd4
20.Qxd7 Nxd7 2LNc4 Nc5 22.NeS Nlf6 =, Popov-1\akmakov, Moscow
Bf5 23.Nc6 Bf6 24.R d5 1.0. Wo rth 1983.
considering is 7 ...Bf5. Machulsky-
b12) 8.Bf4 Nh5 9.0-0 Nxf4
G ufeld, Mos.cow 1991 , continued
I O.exf4 c5 1 t.Ne5 Qb6 12.Qb3
8.c4?! (8.Be2 •) 8 ....c5! 9.bxc5 bxc5
Qxb3 13.axb3 cxd4 14.cxd4 f6
JO. cxd~ Ne4l with a large ad-
15.Nxd7?1 (15.Nef'3=) 1S ...Bxd7
vantage to Black.
16.Ra5 Bh6 17.g3 eS = +, Yusu-
7.BeZ pov- Vaganian, Moscow 1983.
a) 7.b4: b13) 8.h3 e5 9_dxe5 NxeS
al) 7.•.b6 8.b5 Qe8 (8...Bb7 9.a4 lO.NxeS RxeS ll.NO ReS 120-0
R e8 10.Be2 e5 11.0-0 h6 12.Bb4 c6 13.Rel Qb6 14. Bxf6 B:xf6
c5 13.bxc6 Bxc6 14.Qb3 + =, IS.Qc2 Be6 =, Smyslov-Kamsty,
To rre- Zapata, Brussels 1986) Manila Interzonal 1990.
9.Be2 eS 10.0 -0 Bb7 11.a4 Ne4 b2) 7... c5 8.0-0 b6 9.b4 Bb7
12.Rcl a6 13.Bh4 axbS 14.axb5 JO.Qbt cxd4 tl.cxd4 R eS t 2.a4 b6
R a7 15.Bg3 Nxg3 16.bxg3 Q e7 13.Bh4 g5 14.Bg3 Nb5 JS.BeS f6
J7. Nxe5 Nxe5 18.dxe5 Bxe5 19.Nf3 J6.Bg3 Nxg3 17.hxg3 eS?! (17...e6)
Bd6 =, Torre-Kasparov. Brussels 18.Bf5 + -. Malaniuk- Loginov,
1987. Thllinn 1982.
a2) For 7... c6, see lllustrative
Game39.
a3) 7...Re8 8.Be2 e5 9 .Nb3 b6
1LO.Bb5 e4 l l.Bc6 Rb8I2.Nfd2 Bb7
1l3.Bxb7 Rxb7 14.bS a6 1.5.a4 Ra7
11 6.0-0 Qe7 • , Vaganian-
Beliavsky, Erevan 1975.
a4) 7... Qe8 S.B£4 c6 9.Bd3 Ng4! ?
iO.Be2 eS l l.Bg3 fS 12.dxe5 NdxeS
U3.Nd4 gS unclear, Torre-
Vagan ian, Leningrad 1987.
aS) 7... a5 and:
a51) 8.b5 a4 9.Be2 c5 10.bxo6 We now el(amine 81) 7•••Re8 and
l>xc6 11.0-0 cS (11...Qa5 12.c4 82) 7...b6.
Ba6 unclear) 12.R bl +~ , Torre-
Jansa, Biel1985. 81 ) 7...Re8
a52) 8.Be2 Re8 9.0 · 0 e5 10.Nb3 8.0· 0
axb4 ll.cxb4 e4 12.Nfd2 Nf8 a) 8.b4
B.Bh4 h5 14.Qc2 BfS JS.Rfcl Re7 a l ) 8 ... c6 9 .0 -0 aS 10.a4 e5
a6.a4 Ne6 uncle ar, Mala niuk- 1 ~ . b5 c5 12.dxe5 Nxe5 13.Rc1 h6
89
14.Bh4 Nx13+ 15.Bxf3 c4 16.Bxf6 13.Ne1 g5 14.Bg3 hS l.S.h4 Ng4
Bxf6 17.R e 1 + =, Torre-Ftacoik., 16 .bxg5 Qxg5 17.Br4 0&6 t8.f3
Novi Sad 1984. exf3 19.Bd3 fxg2 20.Bxg6
a2) For 8... b6, see Illustrative ~fl =- 0+ 2l.Nxfl fxg6 u nclear ,
Game40. Salov-Gelfand, Linares 1990.
b) For 8 .Qb3, see Illus trative b) t0.Bb4 aS l l.a3 e4 12.Net b6
Game4J. 13.Nc2 Nf8 14.c4 g5 1S.Bg3 Ng6
&. .•e5 16.bxaS R xaS 17.Nb4 R a8 soon
8...c6 and: ended in a draw in Salov-Gelfand.
Reggio Emilia 1991/92..
a) 9.h3 e5 JO.c4 b6 ll .Bh4 exd4
12.Nxd4 Ne5 13.Rcl Qb6 l4.cxdS
Nxd5 t.S.Q c2 unclear, Thkmakov-
Gavriko v, M aza tlan Q u ick Play
1988.
b) 9.a4 e5 lO.dxeS NxeS ll .aS h6
t2.Bh4 Nxf3+ 13.Bd3 Qe7 14.Qa4
gS tS.Bg1 B£5 t6.Rrdt Rad8 17.b3
Nd7 18.0a3 ""' • Rongguaog Ye-
D o uven, Thessalo nild O lympiad
1988.
c) 9.b4 h6 t0.Bh4 eS ll.Rcl e4
12.Ne1 Nf8 13.b5 Ne6 14.bxc6 bxc6
15.c4 Qa5 16.Nc2 Nd? 17.Bg3 Bf8 10- .h6
18.cS bS 19.Rb l N&7 20.Nb4 Re6 lO...Qb6 Jl.Bxf6 Bx£6 12.a3 Qc7
unclear, lbrre-Tbipuy, New Delhi 13.R c1 e4 t4.Nfd2 bS 15.a4 a6 un-
1990. clear. P~trosian -Kortc bnoi, Odes-
9.b4 sa 1974.
a) 9.c4 witb: 1J.Bh4
at) 9...e4 10.Nel c5 ll.Nc2 +=, 1 LBxf6 Qxf6 12. Q c2 ( 12 .R c l
R o ngguaog Ye- Tsesbkovsty, Draw, Vaganian-Nunn, Rotterdam
Belgrade 1988. 1989) 12...e4 13.Nfd2 QgS J4.b5
a2) 9...exd4 tO.Nxd4 NcS ll.cxd5 Nf6 lS.Kb t Ng4? 1 16.b3 Qh4
QxdS 12.8£4 c6 13 .Bf3 Qd8 =, 17.Kgl N£6 18.bxc6 bxc6 19.c4 BfS
Torre-Sokolov, Siel1989. 20.Rfc l R acS 2t.c5 gS 22.Bf1 +c:,
b) 9.b3 cS 10.Bb5 Qb6 1I.Qa4 a6 Oste nstad-Basin, ltnava 1989.
12.Bxf6 Qxb5 13.Qxb5 axbS 11 ..-&5 U .Ba3 Ne413.Rd
14.Bxe5 Nxe5 15.Nxe5 BxeS 13.Q c2 Nxg3 14.bxg3 e4 15.Nfd2
16 .dxeS R xeS 17.b4 + ~. Ben- f5 t6.c4 Nf6 17.a4 Qd6 18.b5? f4
jamin-Hellers. New Yo rk 1993. • +, Ostenstad-St ohl, Trnava
SLc6 1989.
For 9 ...h6 10 .Bh4 e 4 ll.Nel see J3...Nxg3 14.hxgJ e4
rtl ustrative Game 42 To rre- Ubl mano , Thessalo ni ki
10.Nb3 Olympiad 1988, continued 1S.Nh2
a) 10.a4 aS 1 t.Qb3 h6 t2.Bh4 e4 fS t 6.c4 Bf8 17.b5 cxbS t 8 .cxd5
90
•
Qb6 unclear.
Illwtraln'e Glltrw 38
GM VasUy Smyslov
Bl) 7 ... b6 GM Maya Chiburda'n idu
8.b4 .Arubu 1992
a) 8.a4 aS 9.0-0 Bb7 lO.Rel
ReS l l.Qb3 e5 l2.dxe5 NxeS l.Nf3 Nf6 l.d4 &6 3.Be5 Bg7
13.Nxe5 Rxe.5 14.Nf3 ReS t5.Redt 4.Nbdl dS 5.e3 0·0 6 .Bel
Qe7 =, Petrosian-smejkal, Mos- Nbd7 7.0-0 c5 8.c3 bCi 9.a4
cow 1981. 9.Qa4 Bb7 10.Ba6 Qc8 ll.Bb.5
b) 8.0-0 Bb7 9.Rc l c5 10.Qa4 Rd8 12.Ne5 NxeS 13.dxe5 a61
a6 li.Rfd l Qc8 l2.Qb3 bS 13.a4 14.Bc2 Ne4 •+, Vaganinn- Timo-
Bc:6 14.axb5 axbS 15.Ne5 c4 16.Qc2 s hchenko, USSR Championship
1978.
e6 17.Nxd7 Qxd7 18.Bxf6 Bxf6
Draw, Granda Zuoiga-Wauo n, 9.••a6
New York 1987. In order to meet I O.aS with
IO...bS.
10.b4 c4 ll.bSl
Malaniuk-Dolmatov, Moscow
1992, continued I I.Ne.S Bb7 12.f4
with a slight edge fo r White.
ll...Bb7 12.Qc2 e6 t3.Qb2 axbS
14.axb5 Qe7 15 .N eS Rfc8
16.Bf3
Threatening 17.Ndxc4.
l6 ... h6 17.Bd6 xf6 18.Rxa8
Rxa8 19.Ral Ra5
This is the best move aJtbougb it
8.- Bb7 9.0-0 ~8 weakens the a-pawn . 20. Rxa8
Bxa8 2l.Ndxc4 was threatened and
9...Ne4?! JO.Nxe4 dxe4 lt.Nd2 19...Rxal 20.Qxal allows White to
b6 12.Bh4 g5 13.Bg3 fS 14.f3 f4?1 penetrate with his Queen.
( 14... Nf6) 1S.Bf2 + =, exf3 16.Bxf3
Dxf3 l7. Nf3 fxeJ 18.Bxe3 eS 20.lba5 bxaS 2l.Bdl!
19.Qb3+ Kb8 20.Qe6l Qc8 White will now have a dominat-
( 20...Qe8 21.Qh3) 2l.Rael ReS ing pwed pawn after Ba4 and Nc6.
22.Qg6 e4 23.NxgS hxg5 24.Rf7 21 ... Bf'8 ll.Ba4 Nd7
1-0, Kavalek-Browoe. U.S. Cham- If 22...Qa3, tbeo 23.Qxa3 B,;a3
pionship 1986. 24.b6 Bb2 2.5.Nb 1 Ne4 26.Nd7 fol-
10.Bxf6 Bx16 ll.bS a6 12.a4 eS lowed by Nc5 gives White a large
Seirawan- Kudrin, U .S. Cham- advantage.
pionship 198&. continued 13.dxe5 23.Nc:6 Bxc:6 2.4.bxc6 Nf6
NxeS 14.Nxe5 Bxe.S 15.Qb3 axb5 25.Qb8 Ne8 26.g3 Nc:7 l7.NrJ
t6.a.xb5 d4 17.cxd4 Bxd4 18.Rxa8 Ka7
Bxa8 19.Bf3 +•. If 27 ... £6, then 28.Nb4 Kg7
91
29.Bc2 f5 30.Nf3 followed by Ne5. 11/II.Jt.rrllilit Gonle 39
CM Eucenio Torre
GM Garry Kasparov
Thcs:suloniki Olympi4d 1988
B) 5.c3
:S...cxd4
Also possible is 5...0-0 6.Bxf6.
:a) 6...Bxf6 7.Ne4 Qb6 &.Nx£6+ ex£6
9...Nc:6 9.Qd2 d6 10.e3 Nbd7 =. Ostro...sky-
Nezhmetdinov, USSR 1963.
9-.0aS?! 10.Nc3 Nc6 11.Qd2 d6
b) 6...exf6 7.dxc5 f5 8.e3 f4 9.exf4
J2..h4 Be6 13.Kbl R.ac8 14.e4 with
b6 10.Be2 bxcS 11.0-0 dS 12.Nb3
a lar3e advantage to White,
Yusupov-Gorelov, USSR 1981. Qd6 13.Ne5 Nc6 14.Nxc6 Qxc6
lS.B£3 Be6 = , Trifunovic-Spassky,
lO.QdldS Varna Olympiad 1962.
a) JO...Oc7? ll.Nc3 e6 12.e4 £5 6.cxd4 Ne'
13.exf5 Rx£5 14.g3 +•, Torre-
Queen moves like 6... Qa5 or
Vogt, Baku 1980.
6._Qb6 are weaker. 6.-d.S was Ol. 10.
b) IO...QaS lt.Nc3 d6 12.h4 Be6
l3.Kbl NeS 14.e4 Rfta 15.a3 Ng4
16. Nd5 Qxd2 17 .Rxd2 BxdS
18.exdS h5 a , Panczyk-5znapik.
Poland 1982.
ll.QxdS
tl.Ng3 Be6 12.e3 Rc8 13.Kb1
Qb6 and now Agzamov-Loginov,
USSR 1986, con,inued 14.Ne2?!
d4! 15.Ncl?! Nb416.Bd3 NdS ... +.
Instead 'White should play 14.Bd3
d4 15.exd4 Bxa2+ J6.Kxa2 Nb4+
'1 7.Kbl QaS 18.c3 Qa2+ =, ac-
cording to Loginov. 7.e3 0-0 8.8d3
97
Other Bishop moves: and Cl) S.-116. An alternative is:
a) 8.Be2 5 ...cxd4 6 .exd4 Nc6 7 .c3 0 -0
al ) 8...d5 9.0-0 B£5 10.Qb3 Qb6 8.Be2 d6 9.0 -0 h6 10.Bh4 and
ll.Qx:b6 axb6 12.a3 Rfc8 13.Racl now:
Ne4 ( 13 ... Nd7!m) 14.Nxe4 Bxe4 a) JO... Qc7 11.Rel ReS 12.Nc4
15.Bf4 f6 16.Bg3 eS 17.dxeS Nxe5 NdS ==, Guimard- Resbevsky, Mar
1 8.Nd4 + =, Balashov-Hellers , del Plata 1966.
Malmo 1988. b) 10...e5 ll.dxeS d11eS 12.Nc4
a2) 8... d6 9.0.0 BfS 10.Qb3 Rb8 e4 13.Nfd2 Qe7 14.Qc2 g5 15.Bg3
lt.Racl Be6 12.Qa3 Qb6 13.Rfd1 Ne8 16.0 e3 l 7.Nb3 b.5 18.Nca5
Rfe8 14.Bxf6 Bxf6 1.5.Ne4 Bg7 =. Nxa.5 l9.Nxa5 fS 20.f4 +=,
Trifunovic-Tan, Beverwijk 1963. Kovacevic-KoziJI, Ljubljana 1989.
a3) 8... h6 9.Bh4 d6 10.0.0 g5
ll.Bg3 Nh.5 12.Qb3 e5 13.d5 Ne7 C l) s...o.o
14.e4 Nf4 15.Rfe1 Neg6 ""• 'ni· 6.c3
funovic--Oiabsoo, Bled 1961. a) 6.Bxf6
b) For 8.Bc4, see Jllustra tive at ) 6...Bxf6 7.Ne4 Qb6 8.Nxf6+
Game 45. Qxf6 9.c3 d6 10.Be2 b6 11.0-0
8 ... d6 9.0·0 h6 10.Bxf6 Bxf6 Bb7 12.a4 cxd4 J3.exd4 a6 t4.Re1
ll .Qb3 Nd7 = , Taimanov-Oullco. USSR
Black had problems in Trifuoovic- 1976.
Pavlov, Halle 1963. For example, a2) 6... exf6 7.Be2 rs 8.c3 b6
1L.Kg7 12.Ne4 or ll...NaS 12.Qc2. 9.0·0 Bb7 10.Nc4 d5 11 .Nce5 c4
I nstead he played the dubiou$ 12.Ne l Qe7 13.NSf3 f4 ==+,
11 ~.eS? I White correctly sacrificed Arapovic-P aunovic, Y ugoslavia
a piece with 12.Bxg6 Na5 13.Qd5 1983.
Be6 14.Qe4 fxg6 15.Qxg6+ Kg8 b) 6.Bd3 cxd4 7.exd4 Nc6 8.c3 d6
16.Qxb6 + K g8 17.Qg6+ Kh8 9.0-0 b6 1O.Bxf6 Bxf6 ll .d S? Ne5
18.che5 dxeS 19.Ne4 + =. 12. Nxe5 dxe5 13.Qb3 Bg7 14.Radl
Kh7 15.Khl b6 16.Rfel Bb7 17.c4
C) S.e3 f5 = + , Filip-F. Olafsson, Yarn a
Olympiad 1962.
6... b6
a) 6 ...cxd4 7.exd4
al) 7 ...d6 8.Bd3 Nc6 9.0-0 h6
IO.Bh4 Nb5 ll.Rel fS 12.d5 Ne5
13.Bc2 Nf4 =+, Timman-H.
Olafsson, Malta Olympiad 1980.
a2) 7...<15 8.Bd3 Nc6 9.0-0 Qc7
lO.Rel Nh5 ll.Nfl N£4 12.Bb5 e6
13.Qd2 Nb5 14.Ng3 Nxg3 1S.hxg'3
a6 16.Bxc6 bxc6 17.Bh6 + ""• Tri-
fuoovic-Gligoric, Yugoslavia 1971.
Now we examine Cl) 5... 0-0 b) 6...d6 7.Be2 h6 8.Bb4 Nbd7
98
9 .a4 Qc7 lO.Qbl ?! e5 11.0-0 Re8 6.Be2 0·0 7.0-0 l'olc6 8.c3 Re8
12.dxe5 Nxe5 13.N~teS dxe5 =+, 9.a4 Bb7 l O.Bxf6 exf6 1 J.Nb3 Bf8
Guimard-Keres, Buenos Aires 12.a5 Nxa5 13.Nxa5 bxa5 14.Qa4
1964. cxd4 15.Nxd4 ReS! 16.Rfdl Qb6
7.8d3 17.Qxd7 Rd8 18.Qa4 1k5 l9.Qc2
a) 7.Bc4 Bb7 8.0-0 d6 9.h.3 Nc6 Be4 20.8d3 Ba& 21. Bf1 Rb8 =,
10.Qe2 ReS 11.Ba6? (t t.a3) Lechtynslcy-Vo kac, Czechoslo-
li...Qc7 12.Bxb7 Qxb7 13.Rfdt vakia 1984.
Nd8 14.Racl Ne6 lS. Bh4 Rc7 =+. 6 ...Bb7
Tor an- Thimanov, Kapfenberg 6...0-0 7.Bxf6 ed6 6.dxc5 bxc5
1970. a ) 9.Nb3 Qb6 10.Qd.5 d6
b) 7.a4 Nc6 8.Bd3 Bb7 9.0-0 h6 I 1. 0-0-0 Be6! t2.. Qxd6 Rc8
tO.Bb4 d6 l l.Qbl ReS 12.Rc1 cxd4 13.Qxb6 axb6 14.Nfd2 Rxa2 :o + ,
13.exd4 NdS 14.Rel Nf4 15.&4 Qd7 2. Nikolic- Bukic, Yugoslavia 1980.
16.Bg3 gS l7.Bb5 a6 1&.Bfl with a b) 9.Bd3 f5 10.0-0 Nc6 IJ.Qa4
large advantage to White, Ribli- Rb812.Rab1 Qc7 IJ .RfdJ d614.b4
Gbeorghiu. Baile Herculane 1982. Bd7 J.5.Qa3 Ne.S 16.Nrxe5 BxeS =.
7... Bb7 8.0-0 d6 ?.b4 Rustjc-Krnic, Yugoslavia 1983.
9.Qe2 Nc6 1O.Rfd 1 cxd4 t 1.cxd4 , 7.Bd
h6 12.8h4 Nb4 13.Bc4 a6 14.Bb3 a ) 7.Qa41 ? 0-0 8.8e2 d6 9.0-0
ReS IS.Racl bS =.H ort-Smyslov, Nbd7 t0.b4 Q c? Jl .bxcS bxcS
W ijk aan Zee 1972. 12. Rabt Rfc8 t3.Qa3 Nb6 14.Bd3
e6 ( 14... h6 15.Bb4 gS 16.Bg3 Nh5
17.Rfel Nxg3 18.bx&3 e6=)
ts. Rfel h6 16. Bh4 NbS t7.Nfl
cxd4 l8.c;xd4 Bxf'3 ?! 19.gxf3 Qc3
20.Qa6 + =, Kovacevic- Larsen,
Bugojno 1984.
b) 7.Bd3 0 -0 8.0-0 d6 9.Qe2
Nbd7 lO. R Cd l h6 ll.Bh4 gS 12.Bg3
Nh 5 13 .Ba6 Bxa6 14.Qxa6 fS
IS.Nfl Qe8 16.a4 eS = +. Koostan-
tiooposky-Zaitsev, Moscow 1966.
A) 4.8f4
4... dS
4...c5 and:
a) 5.c3 Bg7 6.d5 (6.Nbd2 Nxd2
7.Qxd2 cxd4 8.cxd4 Qb6 9.e3 =,
Zakharo v-Kolpakov. Tasbkent
1964) 6 ...0 -0 7.Nbd2 Nf6 8.d6 Nc6
9.e3 Nh5 10.8&5 (6 l l.Bh4 g5 12.g4
unclear, Gurevich-Gulko, Batumi
1969.
b) For 5.e3 , see Illustra tive
38••24! Game46.
Opening up the h-file. 5.e3 Bg7
S...cS 6.c3 (6.B e5! ? f6 7.Bxb8
39.Qxg4 QxJ4 40.hxg4 Kg7
Rxb8 8.Bb5+ J<f7 9.Bd3 Qb6 un-
4t.RfS Rxbl + 0·1 cl ear, Bronstein-Aronin, Chigorio
Jf 42.Kh l , then 42 ... Rc l + M emo r i al 1959) 6 ... Nc6 7.Nbd2
43.Kb2 Bxg3+ 44.Kh3 Rhl mate. cxd4 8.Nxe4! dxe4 9.Nxd4 Qb6
(9...Nxd4 10.Qxd4 Qxd4 ll.cxd4
+ . ; 9... Bg7 10.Nxc6 Qxdl+ .
Conclusion: After l.d4 Nf6 1l.Rxd1 bxc6 12, Bc7 +=) 10.Nxc6
2.Nf3 g6 3.Bg5 Bg7 4.Nbd2, 4...c.5 Qxc6 11.Qb3 a6 ( ll...Be6 12.Bb5)
is a sharp move cham pioned by 12.Bc4 e6 13.Be5 with a large ad-
both Fischer and Kasparov. vantage to Wh ite , Rytov-
102
•
11/ustraJivt Game 46
NM ADdrei Rakhmangulo"
IM Alexey Fedorov
Nikolatv, Ukmiru: 1993
fllustrati~~e G4me 47
GMTonyMIIes 20.Nxb6! axb6 ll.Rc7 BdS
lM Erling Mortenst.a 22.Qc2 Qd 23.Bb5 + Kf8
Atvhus, Dmmalk J9'}3 24 .Rt8 + Nd8 2S.Rxd8 + Kf7
26.Rxd5 1.0
l.d4 N f6 2 .Nf3 g6 3.c3 Bg7
4.Bg5 Ne4 S.Bf4 d5 6.Nbd2 cS
7.e3 Nc6 8.Nxe4 dixe4 9.Nd2 Conclusion: 3 ... Ne4 is infer ior
9.NgS cxd4 10.exd4 Qd.5 11.Qb3 and less popular than tbe o tber
e6 12Qc2 (11.Bc4 Qf5) f5 13.0 ways of playing against the Torre.
1n5
Index of Annotated Games
106
•
•
CHESS
Many of the top players in the world from both past and
present have employed the Torre Attack. Just a few names
should suffice to demonstrate the viability of this opening
system·: Kasparov, Smyslov, Petrosian, Kortchnoi, Spassky,
Timman, Yusupov, Keres, Bronstein, Alekhine. Half of those
named achieved the coveted title of World Champion!
Those who aspire to complete preparation with the White
pieces using a solid system to achieve a playable middlegame
can hardly do better than to choose the Torre Attack. Its
reputation is absolutely sound and its potential unlimited for
competition at any level.
The material in this book is fully up to date and consists of
47 thoroughly annotated games as well as hundreds of
thematic lines from current master praxis specially chosen to
illustrate the dominant ideas of the opening.
International Master Eric Tangborn, author of the popular
monograph A Fischer Favorite: The King's Indian Attack, is
once again on target with this complete work on an opening
system that has served master and amateur alike.
ISBN 1-.!179479-14-1
$11.95 U.S.A
-
- - -