Part A: Performance Evaluation on KRAs for the Year 2019-20

Sr. No Key Result Area and Key Performance Indicators KRA Target Midyear Actual Rati Individ
corresponding Key Weight Review achiev- ng ual
Performance -age Comment ement as KRA
Indicator (Total s as on on Score
100%) 30.09.201 31/03/2
7 018
Col. 1 Col. 2 (a) Col. 2 (b) Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. Col.
7 8= 3 X
7
1 Maintaining Line Availability 10% 99.72% Inline 99.94% 5 0.5
System Substation availability with
10% 99.72% 99.65% 5 0.5
Availability target
2 Improving system a. % Reduction in total No. of 10% 10 % reduction In line 100% 5 0.5
reliability interruptions of EHV lines & with
through action substation target
plans. b. % reduction in total durations 10% 10 % reduction In line 90% 4 0.4
(Hrs) of interruption of EHV lines with
and S/S. target
3 Maintaining a a. Rate of failure of CT/PT 7% < 0.5% NIL 100% 5 0.35
reliable & stable (Failure
Intra state CT/PT-
transmission Nil)
system b. Rate of failure of CB < 0.4% Nil 100% 5 0.4
8% (Failure
CB Nil)
c. Rate of failure of power < 2% Nil 100% 5 0.5
transformer & ICT 10% (Failure
ICT Nil)
4 Ensuring safety a. To minimize number of accidents 5% No accidents No 100% 5 0.25
of system & involving MSETCL Employees & Accident (No
Employees MSETCL contractors Employees or Accident
outsource. )

b. Monitoring of the fighting system / no fire , safety No fire, 100% 5 0.25

security of substation and awareness regularly Safety (No fire
arranging of safety awareness for awarene safety
employees 5% ss awarene
regularly ss
regularl
y)
5 Increasing work (a) Adherence to diagnostic testing of 5% 100% in time WIP as 100% 5 0.25
efficiency transmission system per
target
(b) Maintaining an efficient communication 100% in time 100% 100% 5 0.25
network and ensuring reliable 5% maintain
communication system (OPGW & PLCC) ed
(c) Effective monitoring of ERP-SAP- 100% in time 100% 90% 4.5 0.09
SRM/ABT/RTU-DC-SCADA system 2% Maintai
ned
(d) Submission of information as directed by 100% in time 100% 90% 4.5 0.135
higher officer 3% maintain
ed
6 Effective (a) F&A issues (R&M/CAPEX/Capitalization) 5% In time In time 90% 4.5 0.225
redressal of F&A
(b) Redressal of grievances and settlement In time In time 90% 4.5 0.225
and HR issues
of employees claims 5%

KRA Section Scores (Sum of Individual KRA 4.825

Part A Score: Score)

Authority Appraisee Reporting Officer Countersigning Office Accepting

Authority
Signature
Designation Exe. Engineer Supr. Engineer Chief Engineer Director (O)
Name S.R. Wagh M.C. Walke A. M. Konadawar