Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1
2 Procedure After these aesthetic and technical decisions for
the assembly and simulations, we obtained both
As we mentioned before, the main purpose of the simulated circuit as seen in Fig. 2 and the
this practice was to design and build a circuit final protoboard assembly observed in Fig. 3
able to execute a specific arithmetic operation,
this being vo = 16v2 −4v1 , being v1 a DC voltage
that goes from -1 to 1 V, and v2 a sinusoidal wave
of 500 mV amplitude and 1kHz frequency. In
order to generate v2 , we used the 4040B function
generator. To generate v1 we used the PL-3003T
Power Supply, which was also used to power the
OpAmps. Figure 2: Complete circuit.
For the purpose of building said circuit, we
found that we required a non-inverting ampli-
fier and a difference amplifier. The non-inverting
one was used to amplify v2 , connecting its out-
put to the non-inverting input of the difference
one.
Prior to starting the assembly of the circuit,
we made some decisions that proved to be very
helpful at the end of the day. Those being, buy-
ing an integrated circuit that had four OpAmps
in it, and using two protoboards.
To assemble the circuit we used a quadruple
OpAmp (LM324N), which has the four internal
OpAmps distribuited as shown in Fig. 1. The
implementation of this amplifier was due to aes- Figure 3: Final circuit.
thetic reasons, because with the employment of
only one amplifier we had more space to orga- From this assembly we can corroborate the
nize the rest of the elements used in the circuit. perfect performance of the requested arithmetic
For the same reason, we used two protoboards, operation as observed in its theoretical value Fig.
on one of them we made all the montage of the 4 and its experimentally measured value Fig. 5
components connected directly to the OpAmp
and, on the other one, we set the rectifier bridge
and the potentiometer.
2
Figure 5: Measured output voltage. Figure 9: Superdiode.
3
full wave rectification to the result of our arith- 3 Results Analysis
metic operation, we paid attention to the assem-
bly of a rectifier bridge which allows us to per- The results we’ve got in the laboratory were not
form a full wave reaction which can be read on far from what we had in the simulation. We
the resistor seen in Fig. 12. measured the output of each stage, both in the
laboratory and simulation.
The differences we can most notice are in the
super diode and the full wave bridge rectifier out-
put, where you can find small disturbances in
the signal that may be caused by the protoboard
connections, the sources connections, diodes or
any problem with the wires themselves. Also we
were not getting an output from the potentiome-
Figure 12: Rectifier bridge. ter of 1 and -1 as we did in the simulation, but
0.9 and -1.2 which could actually represent the
slightly different values received in the labora-
From this full wave rectification the following tory
wave behavior is obtained for a specific value of
voltage in the potentiometer Voltage (v) Measured Expected
Output (vo) 18 18
Diode 7.28 7.34
Superdiode 7.52 8
Bridge rectifier. 5.8 6.7
4
On the other hand, we could learn how to use To sum up, all the expectations on this project
the LTspice Software. Furthermore, we also ac- were successfully accomplished and almost ev-
quired the ability to make the physical montage erything worked out as expected.
of the circuit previously made in LTspice, get-
ting to know that it is important to consider the
References
color code when assembling a circuit.
Additionally, it was necessary to keep in mind [1] A. S. Sedra, K. C. Smith. Microelectronic
the safety regulations, which means, we needed Circuits, 7th ed. Oxford University Press,
to wear gloves and glasses when measuring the 2014.
flows and signals of the circuit.