Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Veronesi,, Milan,
Veronesi Milan, 12 year follow
follow--up. 86% local relapses in the same quadrant
quadrant..
• More flexibility
compared with single
fraction from a Linac.
• Less expensive system
compared to dedicated
IORT Linac.
• No radioactive isotopes
• Minimal room shielding requirements.
• Conclusion:
Conclusion: Delivery of APBI with 3D-CRT
resulted in minimal chronic (> (>66 months)
toxicity to date with good/excellent cosmetic
results.. Additional FU is needed to assess
results
the long term efficacy of this form of APBI
APBI..
T size Local
Pt. Median F/U (cm) N+ ER + relapse
Institution No. age mo. median % % %
Beaumont 92 62 23 - 2 - 0
12
MGH 61 62
(min)
0.9 0 - 0
RTOG 42 61 - 0.85 - - -
0319
• Conclusion:
Conclusion: LC was 99 99,,3%, and 3y local
recurrence Free Survival was 99 99,,6%. Late
effects≥ Grade 3 occurred in 1.8%. This
analysis underlined the safety and effectiveness
of APBI
APBI..
Institut Català d’Oncologia
MultiCatheter APBI: HDR/ LDR Summary
Exc/
Exc/
T size good
Pt. Median F/U N+ ER + Tam LR
(cm) Cosmesis
No. age mo. % % % %
Institution median %
Oschner 51 63 75 1.4 18 - - 2 -
Tufts-NEMC 32 63 33 1.3 9 79 61 3 88
VCU 44 62 42 1.2 18 - 66 0 80
Nat. Inst.
Onc. 45 56 81 1.2 2 82 16 6.7 97
Budapest
Guys Cs 137 49 58 75 2.5 46 - - 18 81
Institut Català d’Oncologia
APBI with Mammosite
MF. Clemente, J. Garcia, MT. Murillo, et al.
Rev. Fis. Med. 10, 133-
133-137. 2009.
Irradiación parcial de la mama con el palicador Mammosite:
Primera experiencia en España.
Exc/
T size Local good
Pt. Median F/U N+ ER +
Institution (cm) relapse
No. age mo. % % Cosmesis
median %
%
Initial Multi-
Multi-
43 69 48 1.0 0 - 0 80
Institutional
88%
Rush Univ. 112 64 - 7 - 0 80
Tis--T1
Tis
Tufts-NEMC/
Tufts-
28 62 19 1.1 0 100 0 86
VCU
St. Vincent
32 62 11 97% T1 9 94 - 86
Hospital
• Conclusion:
Conclusion: At a median FU of 66 months, the
results are similar
similar:: OS (94.
94.6% vs 91.
91.8%), DFS
(88
88..3% vs 90.
90.3%), LR (4.7% vs 3.4%). For
cosmetic results
results:: 81.
81.2% in APBI vs 7070%
% in
WBI (p=
(p=0
0.009
009)).
Institut Català d’Oncologia
1119 WBRT
with a dose of 45-
45-56 Gy
with or without a boost of 10-
10-16 Gy
1. GEC
GEC--ESTRO Phase III trial (Europe)
2. NSABP BB--39 / RTOG0413 Phase III Trial (USA)
3. ELIOT Phase III Trial (Milan, Italy)
4. Rapid Phase III Trial (Canada)
5. Irma Phase III Trial (Italy)
• Conclusion:
Conclusion: These recommendations will provide a clinical
guidance regarding the use of APBI outside the context of a
clinical trial before large-
large-scale randomized trial outcome data
become available
available.. Furthermore they should promote further
clinical research focusing on controversila issues in the
treatment of early
early--stage breast carcinoma
carcinoma..
• Conclusion:
Conclusion: The Task force proposed 3 patients groups groups::1) A “suitable
suitable””
acceptable,, 2) A “cautionary
group,, fo whom APBI ouside a clinical trial is acceptable
group
group”
group ”, from whom caution and concern should be applied when
considering APBI outside of a clinical trial and 3) An “unsuitable
unsuitable”” group
group,,
for whom APBI outside a clinical trial is not generally considered
warranted.. Patients who choose treatment with APBI should be informed
warranted
that whole
whole--breast irradiation is an establised treatment with a much longer
track record that has documented long
long--term effectiveness and safety
safety..
• Ultrasound localization was used to insert the catheters into the border area
of the surgical bed.
• A second patient (2,38%) developed multiple bone and lung metastases and
died in September 2009.