Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
3) M a t e r i a l f a t i g u e - t e s t e d by N o r d b e r g and H e r t z - 2.00O
b e r g : 26
T - 1 s t e e l (United States Steel patented alloy) in
the m i l l - t r e a t e d condition ( T - l ) .
The c o m p o s i t i o n s and t e n s i l e p r o p e r t i e s of t h e s e
a l l o y s a r e shown in T a b l e s I and II.
Two additional m a t e r i a l s were also t e s t e d by the
a u t h o r s , each in t h r e e conditions of cold work:
i) Annealed Multiphase alloy MP35N (a DuPont
Company patented alloy, hereafter referred to as 2.000
0 pct CW MP35N when in this condition).
MP35N alloy reduced 20 pct by cold-rolling (20
pct CW MP35N).
1 ~6DIA DRILL
MP35N alloy reduced 40 pct by cold-rolling (40
pct CW MP35N). Fig. 3 - - P l a n a r d i m e n s i o n s of the s t r a i n c y c l i n g s p e c i m e n s .
2) Annealed Cu-4.6 Si alloy (0 pct CW Cu-4.6 Si).
Cu-4.6 Si reduced 27 pct by cold-rolling (27 pct
CW Cu-4.6 Si)
Cu-4.6 Si reduced 48 pct by cold-rolling (48 pct
CW Cu-4.6 Si).
The compositions and tensile properties of these
alloys also appear in Tables I and II. These, together
2
with the materials mentioned above, provided six dif-
ferent alloys and a total of twelve different conditions z
of mechanical properties.
Fatigue testing was performed on precracked sheets TIME
cycled in tension-tension sinusoidal loading. Center
cracked and single-edge-notched specimen designs o
were used. Mean loads were controlled at 55 pct of
the maximum load.
To obtain c r a c k growth rate data, c r a c k length o.. -2 ~
m e a s u r e m e n t s were m a d e at i n t e r v a l s of 0.20 to 0.60
m m of new c r a c k growth with a t r a v e l i n g t e l e s c o p e .
At the s a m e t i m e the total n u m b e r of load c y c l e s was ~ block 1 d b,ock2d
r e c o r d e d , allowing c a l c u l a t i o n s of growth r a t e to be
m a d e a c c o r d i n g to the equation given below and as Fig. 4--Schematic r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of the type of load h i s t o r y
i l l u s t r a t e d in Fig. 2. u s e d in the i n c r e m e n t a l s t e p test.
18
3
6
6
' I ' ' 1 I ' I ' ' I ''1
6
% ' I ' ' I I ' i ' ' i ''I
C 3 6
v
-6 3
10 4.1
z 6
$<] 3
6
3
7"
g, U
~>~
C
6
3
v 3
, I,,I I , [ , ,I,,I ,
z
AK ( ksi ~ ) 6
3
Fig. 5--(a) Fatigue crack propagation data of alloy 0 pct CW
Cu-4.6 Si; (b) fatigue crack propagation data of alloy 27 pct
CW Cu-4.6 Si; (c) fatigue crack propagation data of alloy 48
4
pct CW Cu-4.6 Si; (d) fatigue crack propagation data of alloy 6
0 pet CW MP35N; (e) fatigue crack propagation data of alloy
20 pct CW MP35N; {f) fatigue crack propagation data of alloy 3
40 pct CW MP35N; (g) fatigue crack propagation data of
alloy24 0 pet CW 70/30; (h) fatigue crack propagation data of , I,,I , I , , I , I I ,
alloy24 82 pct CW 70/30; (i) fatigue crack propagation data of
alloy24 0 pct CW 305SS; (j) fatigue crack propagation data of
alloy24 50 pct CW 305SS; (k) fatigue crack propagation data of ~K ( ksi i4-~. )
alloy25 2024-T3; (1) fatigue crack propagation data of alloy2~
T-1. (b)
6
3
-.
9 I1)
U t.)
% t 9
<.. 6 o
r-
v
,I, oh
v .3
o
Z
Z
W ~
<~
"-z -
4.1 e 3.4 "
~, I I , I ,, I,,I , ,
10
-3
' I''1 I ' I ' '1''1 10 ' I ' I I ' I ' ' I ' ' I '
6 6
3
4
6 6
3 f ~ 3
7 t.)
1056i
u 6 r-
o l
g 3 3
<l
1J
e
2 ~_J3.1
~1,,I
[•O i I , , I ,,l~o , I,,I
> 70
I
§
, I
Vo
, , I,,I |
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS V O L U M E 3, J A N U A R Y 1 9 7 2 - 1 8 3
o t h e r s in growth r a t e . The cause of this d e v i a t i o n was c y c l i n g a r e i l l u s t r a t e d in Fig. 6 w h e r e they a r e c o m -
not d e t e r m i n e d , although o t h e r a n o m a l i e s to be d e - p a r e d with the i n i t i a l , u n c y c l e d s t a t e of each m a t e r i a l .
s c r i b e d l a t e r w e r e a l s o o b s e r v e d in this p a r t i c u l a r A s u m m a r y of p e r t i n e n t data a p p e a r s in T a b l e s IV and
material. V. It was o b s e r v e d that a l l m a t e r i a l s except the 48 pct
The r e s u l t s of m e c h a n i c a l t e s t i n g a f t e r s t r a i n CW C u - 4 . 6 Si tended to r e a c h a r e l a t i v e l y stable
-3
I,/ 7
I I ' ' I ' ' I ' 10 ' I ' ' I I ' I ' ' I ' 'I ' '
6 6
3
-4
10
6 @
3 3
U
u 65 65
>.,,
d 6 9~ 6
)- C
3
z 1<
r~
<3
6
B
7'
167 6 7 _
6 4.8 6
3 3
1# I
§
, I
~'o
, I,,I
-b %
, I , ,I I , I , , i , ,i , ,
>5 § "o ~o%
AK ( ks] z~K ( ksi
(g) 0.n
103 ' I ''1 I ~ I ' I ''1 ' I''I I ' I 'I ''I
C
3
#
6 6
3 B
L;
% l O~
>" 6 i-
v
c 3
#
Z
z 6
<~
< #- "-4 -7 _//~2.8
10
6 3.8 6
3
1~)8 , I,,I -8
10 I,,I I , I , ,I,,I
~ 1o § ~'o --'0% ~%
AK ( k s i i,J~. ) AK ( ksi i#~7.)
Fig. 5--Continued (~) (f
Cu-4.6Si
&
~o| "~ "" "" 0 pct CW 1 -22.0 3.8
27 pct CW 2 -23.4 41
48 pct CW 3 -23.1 4.1
MP35N
IJ
1167 1;6 1;5 1;4 @3
0 pct CW
20 pct CW
40 pct CW
4
5
6
-21 2
-20 4
-19.4
3.4
3.3
31
Aa/AN (In/cycle) 70/30
0 pct CW 7 -25 6 4.8
(k)
82 pct CW 8 -20.4 37
305SS
@31 ' I''I I 0pctCW 9 -219 38
50 pct CW 10 -17 7 28
2024-T3 11 -21.9 40
T-I 12 -190 3I
2. 7075-T6
4340, 1000~ Temper
13
14
-21 0
-19 4
40
32
811 Tt 15 3 8-4 1
8NI, 10NI,
3 HY130, HYI50 16 2.3
o~
-G 1~5 where k is a material constant and n' is the cyclic
e strain-hardening coefficient as defined by a tensile
c- test after the strain cycling history described earlier.
"-- 3 This was not possible with the original uncycled ma-
# t e r i a l s . T h e v a l u e s of n ' s h o w n i n T a b l e IV r e p r e s e n t
values obtained by fitting a least-squares line through
:7 g e v e n l y s p a c e d d a t a p o i n t s o n t h e c y c l i c flow c u r v e s
o v e r a p l a s t i c s t r a i n r e g i o n r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of t h e
s t r a i n c y c l i n g h i s t o r y (0.4 to 4 . 0 p c t p l a s t i c s t r a i n ) .
157 +,
DATA CORRE LATION
3.2 S i n c e it w a s o b s e r v e d earlier that the Paris relation
&alAN : AAK m
I# %% p r o v i d e d a g o o d r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e g r o w t h r a t e
data, a correlation was sought between the constants
AK ( ksi ~ )
A and m and material properties. Before this was
(Z)
d o n e , t h e p o s s i b i l i t y of a n i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n
Fig. 5--Continued the constants A and m was tested. The result is shown
in Fig. 7, indicating a functional relationship may
cyclic state after 20 to 60 cycles. While changes in
exist between A and m and the properties that deter-
hysteresis loop size and shape were often observed
mine the values of these two constants.
until cycling was complete, these tended to be very
Since theoretical growth rate laws suggest a num-
minor, indicating that the greatest transient changes
ber of possible relationships between growth rate
were complete.
parameters and material properties, correlation with
I n t h e c a s e of t h e 48 p e t C u - 4 . 6 Si, s p e c i m e n f r a c -
experimental data was first sought on this basis.
ture interrupted strain cycling after approximately
Specifically, those growth rate equations referenced
45 c y c l e s b e f o r e a s t a b l e c y c l i c s t a t e c o u l d b e
earlier were tested by plotting data for the mechani-
a c h i e v e d . T h e d a t a g i v e n f o r 48 p e t CW C u - 4 . 6 Si i n
cal property parameters suggested by each equation
F i g . 6(a) a n d T a b l e IV t h e r e f o r e r e l a t e s to m e c h a n i c a l
against values of A and m given in Table III. The
p r o p e r t i e s a f t e r 40 c y c l e s , a n d n o t i n a f u l l y s t a b i l i z e d
resuRing graphs produced no meaningful trends, im-
condition.
plying that present growth rate theories are inade-
A m o s t n o t i c e a b l e e f f e c t of s t r a i n c y c l i n g w a s t h e
quate to predict the effect of mechanical properties
t e n d e n c y t o w a r d s l i n e a r log s t r e s s - l o g s t r a i n b e h a v i o r
on low stress fatigue.
after strain cycling. This was particularly true within
Since present theories produced inadequate results,
t h e r a n g e of s t r a i n s i n w h i c h c y c l i n g w a s p e r f o r m e d
other possible correlations were sought. Since it had
(less than 4:pet). Within this region stress-strain be-
previously been observed that materials with high
havior could be satisfactorily described by a power
elastic moduli had better resistance to crack growth,
h a r d e n i n g law s u c h a s
it was felt that perhaps A should be inversely propor-
a = k E n' tional to E. A number of theories predict this, and it
IOO 16o
80, 130
t
%
60 ~ IOO
8O
40- MP35 N
MONOTONIC
..... CYCLIC %
2o n I , nnnl I J , I
9Oo+ %% % % 305 SS
- - MONOTONIC
...... CYCLIC
TRUE PLASTIC STRAIN (in/in}"
(b) 2o , , I ,,,,I I , , I
% % % % o.%
Fig. 6--(a) C o m p a r i s o n o f m o n o t o n i c and c y c l i c t e n s i l e data
Cu-4.6 Si; (b) Comparison of monotonic and cyclic t e n s i l e
data MP35N; (c) c o m p a r i s o n of monotonic and cyclic tensile
data 70/30; (d) c o m p a r i s o n of monotonic and cyclic tensile TRUE PLASTIC STRAIN (in/in)
data 305SS; (e) c o m p a r i s o n of monotonic and cyclic tensile
data T-1 and 2024-T3. (d)
160
Example:Y.S.(after)/Y.S.(before)
~q 70/30
0 pct CW 1 75 0.91 0.63
40
82 pct CW 0.83 0.94 1.67
305SS
MONOTONIC
0 pct CW 1.64 1.01 0.85'
..... CYCLIC , 50 pct CW 0.84 1.00 6 50
2024-T3 1.31 0.94 0.25
T-I 0.69 0,97 t. 11
200 I I I = =ill I t I I
"00~ QOo~" ~ ~ o.%
-28
TRUE PLASTIC STRAIN (in/I/n/
/
Fig. 6--Continued (e)
/ /Q/
/ /
0c~ -24
Table IV. True Stress-True Strain Properties After Strain Cycling J / /
//
Cychc
Yield Ultimate Yield UlUmate Strata
Strength, Strength, Strain, Strain, Hardening -20
Material ksz ksi Pct Pct Coefficmnt
Cu-4.6Si //(~ //
0 pct CW 21 90 0.40 36 0.20 / /
27 pct CW 53 98 0.59 7 0.13 /
48 pct CW 71 114 0.71 3 0.21" -16
/
MP35N
i i I
0 pct CW 91 185 0.47 29 0.06
2 3 4 5
20 pct CW 108 188 0.50 20 0.10
40 pct CW 123 183 0.64 13 0.14 m
70/30 Fig. 7--Apparent c o r r e l a t i o n of values of A and m in the
0 pct Cw 35 55 0.42 26 0.08 growth rate relation.
82 pct CW 69 100 0.63 5 0.11
305SS
0 pct CW 59 133 0.41 35 0.05 g e n e r a l o f t r e n d s . T h e s e r e s u l t s , a s s h o w n in F i g . 8
50 pct CW 103 157 0.56 13 0.11 i n d i c a t e a p r o p o r t i o n a l i t y of
2024-T3 69 79 0.84 4 0.07
1
T-1 75 114 0.45 10 0.10 Acc En'
7075-T6 75 - 0.91 - 0.11
4340, 1000~ Temper 110 - 0,60 - 0,14
T h e s u p p l e m e n t a r y d a t a s h o w n in t h e f i g u r e s a n d
*Valuedoes not correspondto a stable cyclicstate. r e f e r e n c e d in T a b l e III w e r e t a k e n f r o m a l l p u b l i s h e d
d a t a t h a t c o u l d b e f o u n d . 9'2~ Since both fatigue
and strain cycling data rarely exist for the same
It w a s f e l t t h a t t h e i m p o r t a n c e o f r e v e r s e d p l a s t i c m a t e r i a l , t h e a m o u n t of s u p p l e m e n t a r y i n f o r m a t i o n
d e f o r m a t i o n a t t h e c r a c k t i p s h o u l d b e r e f l e c t e d in t h e i s n e c e s s a r i l y r e s t r i c t e d . It s h o u l d a l s o b e n o t e d t h a t
p a r a m e t e r s A a n d m . A c c o r d i n g l y , v a l u e s of c y c l i c no s t r a i n - c y c l i n g d a t a e x i s t s f o r t h e s p e c i f i c s t e e l
mechanical properties were studied for this possibility. a l l o y s r e f e r e n c e d by B a r s o m ( d a t a p o i n t 16),32 a l -
P a r t i c u l a r a t t e n t i o n w a s g i v e n to c y c l i c s t r a i n - h a r d - t h o u g h it w a s a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e o t h e r m a t e r i a l s m e n -
e n i n g , s i n c e t h i s p r o c e s s , a s m e a s u r e d by n ' , r e l a t e s tioned. Existing evidence for similar steels suggests
d i r e c t l y to p l a s t i c b e h a v i o r a n d u l t i m a t e e l o n g a t i o n . t h a t v a l u e s o f n ' f o r t h e s t e e l s in R e f . 16 s h o u l d lie
Combining E and n' and plotting the product against b e t w e e n 0.13 a n d 0 . 1 7 , w h i l e e x p e c t e d v a l u e s of cr~
c o r r e s p o n d i n g v a l u e s of A p r o d u c e d o n l y t h e m o s t s h o u l d r a n g e f r o m 100,000 to 150,000 p s i . 2~ These
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
RE FERENCES
//
1. A. K. Head. Phil Mag, 1953, vol 44, p. 925,
/ 2. N, E, Frost and D. S Dugdale.Z Mech, Phys Sol, i958, voI 6, p. 92
3. H, W. Lm: Trans. ASME, 1961, vol. 83D, p. 23
4. H,W. Lm Trans. ASME. 1963, vol 85D, p. 116,
Log AK 5. J Weertman:lnt.J. Fract Mech,, 1966, vol, 2, p 460.
Fig. ll--The effect of increasing amounts of cold work on 6. A. J McEvdyand T. L. Johnston Proc. int. Conf Fraet., Sendal,Japan, 1966,
growth rate curves. p. 515.
7. R. G. Forman, V. E. Kearney, and R M Engle"Trans. ASME, 1967, vol 89D,
p. 459.
t h e g r o w t h r a t e e q u a t i o n , t h e p o i n t a t w h i c h two g r o w t h 8. K R. Lehr and H. W. Llu: lnt J. Fract Mech, 1969, vol 5, p 45
r a t e c u r v e s i n t e r s e c t b e c o m e s a s i m p o r t a n t in d e t e r - 9. N. E. Frost andJ. R. Dixon Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1968, vol 3, p. 301.
mining relative fatigue life as their slopes. By the 10. T. Yokobon and M. Ichlkawa Rep Res. lnst, Tohoku Untv., 1968, vol, 4,
s a m e token, a p o s i t i v e s t a t e m e n t about the individual p. 45.
11. B. Tomkms"Phil. Mag., 1968, vol. 18, p. 1041.
e f f e c t s of E , n ' , a n d cr~ o n f a t i g u e l i f e i s not p o s s i b l e 12. P. C. Pans: Fattgue-An lnterdtsctplmary Approach, J J. Burke, N L Reed,
a t t h i s t i m e . It i s o b s e ~ ' v e d , h o w e v e r , t h a t i n c r e a s i n g and V. Wems,eds., p. 107, Syracuse UmversityPress, Syracuse,N, Y, 1964.
E t e n d s to d i s p l a c e g r o w t h r a t e c u r v e s to t h e r i g h t , 13 H. H. Johnson and P. C. Paris J. Engr. FractureMech, 1968, voI. 1, p 3.
while holding E constant and changing other properties 14 W. Elber: J Engr. FractureMech, 1970, vol 2, p 37.
t e n d s to r o t a t e r a t h e r t h a n d i s p l a c e g r o w t h r a t e 15 G. R. Irwin 3". Engr FractureMech, 1968, vol t, p. 241
16 Unpublishedresearch,calculationsmade by the authors.
curves. 17. L. F. Coffin,Jr. and J F. Tavernellr Trans. TMS-AIME, 1959, vol 215, p.
A l t h o u g h t h e s e r e s u l t s do n o t m a k e it p o s s i b l e to 794.
define a precise model of crack growth, they indicate 18. L. F. Coffin,Jr.: Appl Mater Res., 1962, vol. 1, p. 129.
t h e r e l a t i v e i m p o r t a n c e of c r a c k tip d e f o r m a t i o n p r o c - 19 L. F. Coffin,Jr.: Trans. ASM, 1967, voi 60, p. 160
e s s e s . In v i e w of t h e r e s u l t s o f t h i s s t u d y it i s t h e 20. J. Morrow.Am. Soc Test. Mater., Spec. Tech Publ. 378, p 45, Phdadelphla,
1965.
authors' conclusion that reversed plastic deformation 21. T. Broom Mater Sci. Eng., 1968-69, vol. 3, p 138.
d i r e c t l y a h e a d of a g r o w i n g fatigue c r a c k is f a r m o r e 22. R W. Landgraf, J Morrow,and T, Endo. J Mater, 1969, vol 4, p 176.
important than generally acknowledged. Present evi- 23. C. E. Feltner and C Laird ActaMet, 1967, vol 15, p 1621.
dence indicates that strain cycling occurring within the 24. J. H. Weber,Jr.: Ph.D. dmsertation,Lehigh Umverslty, 1969.
25. R. W. Hertzberg: Ph.D. dlssertanon,LehighUmverslty, 1965.
r e v e r s e d p l a s t i c z o n e c a n b e e x p e c t e d to a l t e r m e t a l -
26. H. Nordbergand R. W Hertzberg Unpubhshedresearch, LehighUmverslty,
l u r g i c a l s t r u c t u r e a n d m e c h a n i c a l p r o p e r t i e s in m u c h Bethlehem,Pc., 1969.
the s a m e way that s t r a i n c y c l i n g a f f e c t s the s t r u c t u r e 27 G. R. Irwin:Proc. of the Sagamore Conf on Research for Ordnance and
a n d b e h a v i o r of l a r g e - s c a l e s p e c i m e n s . Matertals, 1960, p. 63.
28. G. A. Miller: Trans. ASM, 1968, vol 61, p. 442
29. T. Endo and J. Morrow.J Mater, 1969, vol. 4, p. 159.
CONCLUSIONS 30. D. P. Wdhelm.Am Soc. Test. Mater, Spec. Tech Publ. 415, p 363, Phfla-
delphla, 1967
As a r e s u l t of the p r e v i o u s d i s c u s s i o n , the following 31. P C Parisand F. Erdogan: Trans. ASME, 1963, vol. 85D, p. 528
conclusions are drawn: 32. J. Barsom"Ph.D. dissertation,Umversityof Pittsburgh, 1969.