Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
he would merely show the check to his creditor to gain more time to
agreement
D. None
D. The drawer of the dishonored check paid its value within 5 days
and dying business partner Ben to sign it. The promissory note bound
Ben to pay Anthony One Million Pesos (P1,000,000) plus 12%
If Ben died before the promissory note's due date and Anthony
(C) Estafa.
D. private individuals.
estafa, but the actual recital of facts of the offense charged therein, if
proven, would constitute not only the crime of estafa, but also
relatives of his wife is dissolved by the death of his wife and the
available to AAA.
d) Considering that under the given situation, the two (2) crimes of
Informations for illegal recruitment under the Labor Code and for
recruitment under the Labor Code and for estafa by means of deceit
for the same act is violative of the principle against double jeopardy.
Informations.
means of deceit.
means of deceit.
check and by writing the payee and amount of the check to the
a) The seller of a laptop computer who failed to inform the buyer that
the laptop had a defect. (* Estafa under Art. 318, Other Deceits, RPC –
b) The person who ran away with a cell phone which was handed to
c) The person who assured he will pay interest on the amount but
failed to do so as promised.
d) The son who induced his father to buy from him a land which the
processing fee for passport and visa, but no receipt was issued for
travel documents.
65. Which of the following acts does not constitute estafa or other
forms of swindling?
owner thereof.
Benz for P7.5 Million from Switik Trading. On the same day, he paid
dated July 31, 2011. He then brought the car to a friend's house and
due date. Efren was asked to honor and pay the check or to return
(A) Carnapping.
29. X draws a check upon request of Y, the payee, who told X that
he would merely show the check to his creditor to gain more time to
agreement
D. None
month after the transaction. Two days before maturity, Frank called
Eric telling him he had insufficient funds and requested that the
ANSWER:
million. Mr. Benjie readily accepted Mr. Ed’s payment of three (3)
delivered the materials to the house of Mr. Ed. The following day, Mr.
with the same assurance that the checks will be honored upon
to make good the checks. Thereafter, Mr. Benjie filed before the
despite the partial payments. On the other hand, Mr. Ed counters that
no demand letter was earlier sent to him, that the obligation is merely
civil in character and that novation took place when Mr. Benjie
ANSWER:
However, the 2 other checks had been issued in payment of a preexisting obligation, hence, estafa is not
committed as the issuance of
Bouncing Checks Law, for the issuance of the 5 checks which were
absence of demand letter will not free him from the criminal liability
already incurred. The partial payments would only affect his civil
liability while his claim of absence of demand letter is negated by the