InSWEd 2019

TEACHER'S PERCEPTION OF THE PROTECTION OF

PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS AND EDUCATION STAFF AS
AN EFFORT TO INCREASE TEACHER PROFESSIONALISM
Fredy Hermanto1, Aisyah Nur Sayidatun Nisa2, Asep Ginanjar3, Noviani Achmad Putri4
Prodi Pendidikan IPS FIS UNNES, Indonesia
fredy@mail.unnes.ac.id

Abstract. In this era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 protection of teachers and teaching staff is still minimal,
overcoming the emergence of cases of resistance to teachers in Indonesia. Today, education has become an
integral part of the public sphere. If there is a case that befalls a teacher, the community will pay more attention.
As a form of assistance for educators and educators in carrying out their professional duties the Ministry of
Education and Culture issues Permendikbud No. 10 of 2017 concerning protection for teachers. The existence
of this rule is expected to provide peace for the teachers in carrying out their duties and profession
professionally. However, the understanding of teachers and educational institutions regarding this matter is still
low, so that in carrying out their profession the teachers need to worry if they want to act. This study used
qualitative research methods. The location of the study was conducted in environmental education in the city
of Semarang. Primary data in this study was published, Head of PGRI organization; 2) Educators and Education
Personnel; 3) Educational Unit. The method of data analysis in this study is Interaction Analysis (Interactive
Analysis). The results of this study are the teacher's assessment of Permendikbud No. 10 of 2017 concerning
Aspects of the Protection of Educator Professions in Semarang City Conditions that can be seen from the lack
of teachers, also resolve conflicts related to the teaching profession which are mostly limited to the school
environment and maintain family.

Keywords: Teacher profession, teacher protection, teacher professionalism

INTRODUCTION
Background and Objectives
The emergence of several cases of violence against teachers actually originated from omissions
carried out by teachers in response to deviant student behavior. To take action against students who
behave negatively, the teacher seems afraid of violating human rights if they take action against
students, plus the teacher still lacks understanding of the steps that must be taken if they find students
who behave deviant. Teachers in certain cases, besides being referred to as perpetrators of violence
against students, are also victims of violence from students and / or parents of students. Teachers
reportedly violated children's protection rights when sanctioning disciplinary violations on students,
such as picking, pinching, yelling, running around the school grounds, pushing up several times,
honoring flags in hot weather conditions until the end of class, cleaning toilets and so on. This is
compounded by the incomprehension of the parents of the students if guidance is provided by the
teacher, so that the teacher tends to neglect the deviant student behavior rather than dealing with
legal cases.
Today, education has entered and become an inseparable part of the public sphere. If there
is a case that befalls a teacher, the community will pay more attention. In the city of Semarang, a
polemic recently emerged between the school and students and parents regarding bullying. When
the school issues a decision regarding students' deviant behavior, many parties then oppose the
decision issued by the school because it is deemed not to protect the child's right to learn. Community
views and assumptions that emerge from the community towards teachers who suffer from problems
will further reduce the image of a teacher, even though in reality the actions taken are part of an
effort to educate students to be able to behave and act positively. The teacher is currently faced with
a dilemmatic position between the goals of education and the views of the community, on the one
hand wanting to educate students so that educational goals can be achieved on the other side in an

Proceeding International Seminar and workshop on Education (InSWEd)

Garut, West Java, Indonesia
17-18 February 2019 132
 InSWEd 2019

effort to uphold student discipline, clashed with the Child Protection Act and Indonesian Child
Protection Commission (KPAI).
As a form of protection for educators and educators in carrying out their professional duties
the Ministry of Education and Culture issues Permendikbud No. 10 of 2017 concerning protection
for teachers. Teachers are professional educators whose job is to educate, teach, guide, direct, train,
evaluate and assess students, but not a few teachers who feel uncomfortable and not calm in carrying
out their duties, this is caused by various factors including: uncertainty in employment status ,
uncertainty about welfare, uncertainty in professional development and uncertainty in legal
advocacy. The existence of Permendikbud No. 10 of 2017 is expected to provide peace for teachers
in carrying out their duties and professions. However, the Minister of Education and Culture is a
new legal product issued by the Ministry of Education and Culture, so the teachers do not fully
understand the contents of the regulation, so this study aims to find out: Teacher's perceptions of
Permendikbud No. 10 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Educators and Education Personnel in
Semarang City, knowing the role of Permendikbud No. 10 of 2017 concerning the Protection of
Educators and Education Personnel in protecting teachers.
Permendikbud No. 10 Tahun 2017
In Article 1 paragraph 1 and 2 Permendikbud Number 10 of 2017 The educators and
education personnel in question are:
1. Educators are teachers, tutors, tutors, instructors, facilitators, and technical speakers.
2. Education personnel are managers of educational units, supervisors, supervisors, researchers,
developers, library staff, laboratory personnel, learning resource technicians, administrative
personnel, psychologists, social workers, therapists, cleaning and security personnel.
In Article 2 paragraph 1, paragraph 6, Permendikbud Number 10 of 2017 is a form of legal
protection for educators and education personnel, where the article states that:
1. Protection is an effort to protect Educators and Education Personnel who face problems related
to the implementation of tasks.
2. Protection as referred to in paragraph (1) includes protection: a. law; b. profession; c.
occupational Health and Safety; and / or d. intellectual property rights.
3. Legal protection as referred to in paragraph (2) letter a includes protection against: a. violence;
b. threat; c. discriminatory treatment; d. intimidation; and / or e. unfair treatment, from the part
of students, parents of students, the community, bureaucracy, and / or other parties related to
the implementation of duties as Educators and Education Personnel.
4. Protection of the profession as referred to in paragraph (2) letter b includes protection against:
a. termination of employment that is not in accordance with the provisions of the legislation;
b. giving improper compensation; c. restrictions in conveying views; d. professional abuse;
and / or e. other restrictions or prohibitions that can hinder Educators and Education Personnel
from carrying out their duties.
5. Occupational safety and health protection as referred to in paragraph (2) letter c covers
protection against risks: a. job security disruption; b. work accident; c. fire at work time; d.
natural disasters; e. health of the work environment; and / or f. other risks.
6. Protection of intellectual property rights as referred to in paragraph (2) letter d in the form of
protection against: a. Copyright; and / or b. industrial property rights.

Educator and Education Staff

According to Law No. 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System article 1 paragraph 5
and 6 what is meant by education personnel are members of the community who are devoted
and appointed to support the implementation of education. Whereas educators are qualified
educational staff as teachers, lecturers, counselors, tutors, widyaiswara, tutors, instructors,
facilitators, and other designations that are appropriate to their specialty, and participate in
conducting education.

Proceeding International Seminar and workshop on Education (InSWEd)

Garut, West Java, Indonesia
17-18 February 2019 133
 InSWEd 2019

Professional Protection
Protection of the profession includes protection against termination of employment that is not in
accordance with the laws and regulations, giving unreasonable rewards, harassment of the profession
and other restrictions that can hinder the teacher from carrying out his duties. The history of
education in Indonesia shows that the treatment that tends to be discriminatory towards some
teachers has been going on since the days of the Dutch colonial government. This raises awareness
to continue to strive so that the teacher has a clear and basic status or dignity. The result, among
others, is the formation of Law No. 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers.

RESEARCH METHODS
This study used qualitative research methods. The research method used in this study is adapted to
the main objectives of the study, namely to describe the teacher's perception of Permendikbud No.
10 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Educators and Education Personnel in the City of Semarang.
Location of research on teacher perceptions of Minister of Education and Culture No. 10 of 2017
concerning the Protection of Educators and Education Personnel in the City of Semarang is carried
out in the educational environment in the City of Semarang, be it schools, PGRI secretariat,
Semarang City Education Office and other work units related to the world of education. Primary
data in this study include, Head of PGRI organization; 2) Educators and Education Personnel; 3)
Educational Unit; While secondary data, data that serves as a complement or supporter of primary
data, namely in the form of literature supporting books and articles.
The research data was obtained by conducting: interviews, documentation observation
Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The testing technique used in determining the validity of the data
in this study is using triangulation. In this study the data validity used is by combining two
triangulation techniques, namely source triangulation and method triangulation. Triangulation uses
a combination of data source triangulation techniques and triangulation methods such as circles,
which can be initiated from finding data from any source and then cross-checking other sources with
other methods. The method of data analysis in this study is Interaction Analysis (Interactive
Analysis).

DISCUSSION
Research related to Minister of Education and Culture No. 10 of 2017 concerning the protection of
educators and education personnel in the city of Semarang. That is, with the main focus on how
teachers perceive the Permendikbud and the extent of the Permendikbud role in the world of
education. The following researchers present the results and discussion about perceptions and roles
according to the reality in the field in several government education agencies.
Teacher's perception of Permendikbud No. 10 of 2017 concerning the Protection of
Educators and Education Personnel in the City of Semarang (Study of Professional Protection
Aspects)
Talking about perceptions here means the teacher's assumption about the existence of new
regulations from the government, namely concerning Minister of Education and Culture No. 10 of
2017 concerning the protection of educators and education personnel. There are a number of
indicators that are the material to the extent of teacher perceptions here, these indicators are: aspects
of legal protection, aspects of professional protection, aspects of occupational safety and health and
aspects of intellectual property rights protection. However, this paper focuses on the study of aspects
of professional protection.
Teachers in carrying out their duties professionally must be supported by professional
protection, so that teachers feel more comfortable in carrying out their duties and functions. The
teacher is not haunted by various kinds of things that can interfere with the teacher's focus in carrying

Proceeding International Seminar and workshop on Education (InSWEd)

Garut, West Java, Indonesia
17-18 February 2019 134
 InSWEd 2019

out their duties, such as giving unnatural rewards, breaking to the profession, limiting or prohibiting
the teacher in carrying out his duties. Teachers' perceptions of the profession's protection teachers
are given the right of authority in educating students, if there is a need for a fit and proper test to
become a teacher, so that the world of education is no longer preoccupied with the actions of teachers
who do not understand the essence of educating.
Regarding professional protection, not all teachers understand. In the protection of this
profession there are a number of things that become its scope, namely relating to termination of
employment that is not in accordance with the provisions of legislation, giving improper rewards,
restrictions in conveying views, harassment of the profession and other restrictions or prohibitions
that may hinder educators and education personnel in carrying out their duties.
The Role of Permendikbud No. 10 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Educators and
Education Personnel in Protecting Teachers (Study of Professional Protection Aspects)
Roles carried out by the Office of Education and Principals related to Educators who
experienced:
1) Termination of employment that is not in accordance with the provisions of the
legislation.
Termination of employment (Termination of Employment) is the termination of a work relationship
because of a certain matter that results in the termination of rights and obligations between the
worker and the company / employer. This can occur due to resignation, dismissal by the company
or contract termination. According to Article 61 of Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning labor, a work
agreement can end if: 1) Resignation is good at its own volition; 2) Resignation in writing of your
own volition due to the end of the employment relationship; 3) Resignation because it reaches
retirement age; 4) Workers make serious mistakes; 5) Workers are detained by the authorities; 6)
The company / company has a loss; 7) Workers are absent continuously; 8) Workers die; 9) Workers
commit violations; 10) Change of status, merger, melting down or change of ownership; 11)
Termination of Employment for reasons of Efficiency.
Based on the results of research, workers or teachers who resign are usually due to various
things including moving to another place, stopping for personal reasons, etc. The teacher can submit
resignation to the school without coercion / intimidation, but there are several conditions that must
be carried out by the educator before resigning, including: 1) Educators must submit applications no
later than 30 days, 2) Educators do not have official ties; 3) Educators continue to carry out
obligations until they resign. In addition there are also educators who experience termination of
employment because the contract period or agreement with the school has expired.
Educators whose contract expires are educators whose employment has ended as stated in
the Specific Time Work Agreement (PKWT). If educators do not violate company regulations in the
implementation of this PKWT, then the layoffs that occur include the break up category by law. This
kind of layoff is actually at the legal level that does not require the school to provide severance pay,
award money or compensation. But in practice even though the contractual term of service for
honorary teachers continues to receive severance pay, in this case, it is usually referred to as salts.
Dismissal of teachers or educators also usually occurs because of unilateral layoffs by the school.
This layoff is carried out if educators violate work agreements, school regulations or
collective labor agreements (PKB). However, before dismissing them, the school is required to give
warning letters 3 times in a row. Schools can also determine appropriate sanctions depending on the
type of violation, and for certain violations, the school can issue SP 3 directly or directly dismiss.
All of these things are regulated in work agreements, company / school regulations, because each
school has different regulations.
Based on research there has never been a case of teachers having terminated employment
without severance pay. However, in the world of work in the field of education there is a name given
by Tali Asih for cooperation or mementos to honorary teachers for the service that has been done so
far teaching in several junior high schools in Semarang. This happens if the work contract or

Proceeding International Seminar and workshop on Education (InSWEd)

Garut, West Java, Indonesia
17-18 February 2019 135
 InSWEd 2019

agreement from the school with the teacher is over. Another case when certain cases occur, will be
a discussion by the teacher with the teacher, then if it cannot be resolved between teachers then
intense discussions are held with the principal.
2) Unqualified Rewards
In the second indicator, which is giving unnatural rewards, it is experienced by some junior high
school teachers in the city of Semarang. This can be seen in the provision of salaries, especially to
honorary teachers who are still brought in. The average UMR in the city of Semarang is only Rp.
200,000 up to Rp. 500,000. This is because the allocation of funds for honorary teachers is only 15%
of the existing budget and BOS. In addition, there are still many honorary teachers who get a salary
below the UMR due to the unclear status of teachers who have served in public schools. This
condition occurs because one of the contents of the Government Regulation Number 48 of 2005
states that the laragan is to appoint honorary staff.
Based on the contents of Government Regulation No. 48 of 2005, honore teachers
appointed by school principals have not been valid based on staffing regulations. So that the
consequences of this unclear status resulted in teachers being unable to have NUPTKs, as well as
other impacts resulting in the honorary teachers being unable to take certification. Therefore, the
rights of honorary teachers both in public schools cannot be fulfilled. Such conditions are also
experienced by honorary teachers who serve in private schools still depend on the foundation that
manages the school.

3) Restrictions on Conveying Views

Freedom of expression in public is human rights guaranteed by Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution
which states: "Freedom of association and assembly, issue thoughts with oral, written and so forth
stipulated by law", this is in line with the provisions of Article 19 Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. Efforts to build a democracy that is socially just and guarantees human rights requires an
atmosphere that is safe, orderly and peaceful, and is carried out responsibly in accordance with the
provisions of the applicable legislation.
Thus, freedom of expression in public must be carried out with full responsibility, in line
with the provisions of the applicable legislation and the principles of international law as stated in
Article 29 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which, among others, stipulates the
following: 1) Everyone has an obligation to society that allows the development of his personality
freely and fully; 2) In the exercise of their rights and freedoms, each person must submit solely to
the restrictions determined by law with the intention of guaranteeing the recognition and
appreciation of the rights and freedoms of others, and to fulfill the conditions that are fair to morality,
as well as welfare common in a democratic society; 3) This right and freedom must not be carried
out in a way that is contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Based on Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution and the existence of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, this is also in line with the findings of research in the field. The results of research
in the field indicate that there are no restrictions in the delivery of views in the school environment.
So in school most of them implemented a system of collective consultation in equalizing views. If
there is a difference of views, it will be discussed together between the supervisor and subordinates,
namely the principal with the teaching staff and education staff. This is evidenced by the existence
of a meeting of work meetings with all educators and education staff.
4) Professional harassment
Juridically, the teacher has been recognized as a profession. In Law No. 14 of 2005
concerning Teachers and Lecturers explained that teachers are professional educators with the main
task of educating, teaching, guiding, directing, training, evaluating, and evaluating students in early
childhood education in formal education, basic education and secondary education (Article 1
paragraph 1).

Proceeding International Seminar and workshop on Education (InSWEd)

Garut, West Java, Indonesia
17-18 February 2019 136
 InSWEd 2019

As a profession, of course there are risks faced by teachers in carrying out their professional
duties. Therefore the teacher needs protection. Several legal rules were issued. Law No. 14 of 2015
concerning Teachers and Lecturers, Article 39 emphasizes, "The government, regional government,
community, professional organizations, and / or educational units must provide protection for
teachers in the implementation of tasks (paragraph 1). Protection as referred to in paragraph (1)
includes legal protection, professional protection, and occupational safety and health protection
(paragraph 3) ".
Government Regulation No. 74 of 2008 concerning the Teacher also emphasized that the
teacher has the right to receive protection in carrying out tasks in the form of security and safety
guarantees from the government, regional government, education units, teacher professional
organizations, and / or communities in accordance with their respective authorities (Article 40
paragraph 1 ) In addition, the Minister of Education and Culture Number 10 of 2017 concerning
Protection for Educators and Education Personnel strengthens the position of teachers in carrying
out their professional duties. In Article 2, it is explained that protection is an effort to protect
Educators and Education Personnel who face problems related to the implementation of tasks
(paragraph 1). Protection as referred to in paragraph (1) includes legal protection; profession;
occupational Health and Safety; and / or intellectual property rights (paragraph 2).
Juridically, the legal basis governing the protection of professions, especially for teachers,
already exists. However, in reality teachers are still experiencing violence. Threats, intimidation,
shouting and beating continued to be received by the teacher. Ironically, this disrespectful attitude
is actually accepted by teachers from parents whose children are educated by teachers. This
condition indicates that; First, the implementation of the regulation has not been fully implemented.
The chain of violence that keeps shackling teachers proves that legal protection is still weak against
educators. The weak protection of teachers is a result of not being socialized by the rules of law for
teacher protection. Therefore the government must socialize. In addition to involving relevant
parties, this socialization also needs to collaborate with religious leaders and community leaders.
Second, parents do not understand the role of educators in carrying out professional duties. The task
of the teacher is not only teaching but also educating, fostering, and guiding students. Coaching as
done by the teacher is in the context of carrying out professional duties. Therefore, if the parents do
not accept the action given by the teacher to their child, they must establish a dialogue with the
(head) of the school to address this matter, rather than directly judging the teacher.
Based on the case above, whatever the reasons behind it, acts of violence against teachers
should not be allowed because it will make the teacher afraid. Afraid of being encircled by legal
issues and fear of being persecuted by parents. Besides that the teacher can become apathetic with
the task of educating. If this condition arises in the teacher, then the teacher may ignore one of his
tasks, namely educating. An important task relates to the formation of character and character of
students. Educating goes beyond teaching tasks that only transfer knowledge.
The act of violence in the world of education occurs because the relationship between the
three components of education is not well established. Because of that, communication between
schools, families and communities needs to be built. If communication is well established, strong
emotional bonds will be built. Thus every issue that arises will not be faced with violence. Finally,
the cooperation of all parties in providing protection for teachers is needed so that the teacher really
feels safe and comfortable in carrying out his professional duties.
So far based on the results of the study, there has been no legal protection that runs firmly,
because so far the role that has been carried out in dealing with violations of the profession is still
through deliberation and mediation between parties who experience family harassment. If there are
cases of abuse at school, the school rarely reports to the education office. This is because when
reporting this, it will affect the assessment of the principal and school.
5) Other restrictions / restrictions that can hinder educators and Education Personnel from
carrying out professional duties

Proceeding International Seminar and workshop on Education (InSWEd)

Garut, West Java, Indonesia
17-18 February 2019 137
 InSWEd 2019

There are many cases of teachers who are easy and often criminalized when carrying out their duties
and obligations assuming that there are no strong tools in the teacher and lecturer law that
specifically explain the protection of the teaching profession. By looking at the many incidents in
the field involving the teaching profession, it seems that MA Jurisprudence (12/8/2016) on teachers
cannot be criminalized and PP 74/2008 concerning the protection of the teaching profession has not
been sufficient to answer the challenges of the situation. Because the position is still under the law,
the teacher should be literate-political literate, this capability is also developed so that they know
and are aware when punishing their students, can also be involved in policy making both at the
education, regional, national and international units including in management settings and education
policy making.
Learning from several cases of teachers who in carrying out their vulnerable tasks is easily
and often criminalized by the teacher to think again when they want to punish students who violate
school discipline and discipline. The position of the PP for teacher profession protection is not yet
strong and there is no law on teacher protection, because when there is a case in the field there is the
resistance of parents of students with the pretext of child protection law and the Ham Law with a
higher position than the two legal instruments above, needed in the future profession to urge the
entry of a more detailed clause on the protection of the teaching profession in Law No. 14 of 2005
concerning Teachers and Lecturers, even the possibility of "option" being made immediately by the
Teacher Professional Protection Act. In order to save the profession the teacher in charge in the field
is often faced with the law.
If we associate it with the national education goals stated in Law No. 20, 2003. Article 3,
it can be ascertained that this goal will never materialize if all teachers already feel they do not have
freedom and fear in taking a policy or action that must be given to their students in order to carry
out their duties as learning and education agents who must shape the behavior of their students into
knowledgeable and noble people (good morals). With the many cases and problems that afflict
teachers above there seems to be a problem in our education system.
Legal and political literacy teachers are needed as a necessity because often the future of
modern education has different paradigms, first the teacher punishes his students will not be a
problem and no one dares to report their parents, and suppose the report is even the child who gets
easily with his parents. However, in another era, the students were pinched a little and immediately
reported their parents, and strangely, their parents immediately hit the teacher without confirmation
and spoke carefully first. This latter teacher's ability must also be developed. Although this capability
which is still impressed in "castration" by policy makers - has not been widely revealed. The number
of jobs, teaching taking care of students causes time to expire in class. Because if the teacher is
literate-political law might be a powerful force.
Therefore, with such conditions, the teacher prefers to have more attitudes to minimize the
relation with giving punishment to students. Moreover learning now can be done without face to
face, using technology. If there are cases related to punishment for students, the teacher tends to give
only warnings which results in students now experiencing moral setbacks in their students.
Other options to be able to overcome the above problems so that there is no attempt at
criminalization, teachers must be united in solid and high solidarity so that they have a strong
professional organization, professional and modern. A strong organization can be used as a pressure
power thinking power and control power so that it has a bargaining position (bergaining position).
In accordance with the Teacher and Lecturer Law No. 14 of 2005 the presence of professional
organizations is absolutely necessary in accordance with Article 41 paragraph 3. Professional
organizations are required by teachers to advance the profession of increasing competence, career,
educational insight, including welfare and advocacy for the community.
Protection of the teaching profession is indeed a government obligation, but on the other
hand the teacher must play an active role in seeking the realization of such protection, such as Islamic
teachings that explain that a people cannot change their destiny unless they do it themselves.

Proceeding International Seminar and workshop on Education (InSWEd)

Garut, West Java, Indonesia
17-18 February 2019 138
 InSWEd 2019

Teachers must be constructively critical of government policies and participate in public policy
formulation. When teachers feel disadvantaged by a policy both school policy and government
policy, they can take steps to criticize the policy. To be able to carry out their rights and obligations
and avoid the practice of discrimination against their profession, the teacher must know and
understand the laws and regulations regarding education, especially about teachers such as: Law
number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System, Law number 14 of 2005 concerning
Teachers and Lecturer, PP number 19 of 2005 concerning National Education Standards (SNP), PP
number 74 of 2008 concerning Teachers, and so on.
Legal protection is very important for teachers, because only with the existence of legal
protection can teachers in general be free from being threatened by the interference of certain
elements. Thus the teacher will not feel afraid and hesitant to take a policy and action in carrying
out his duties as a teacher, especially in shaping the character of a noble nation. The most important
thing about legal protection for teachers is the actual implementation, do not let this guarantee (legal
protection) only exist on paper. Hopefully, with the protection of the teaching profession this can
help teachers in carrying out their duties to reach the goal of national education.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Conclusion
Based on the results of the research and discussion above it can be concluded that:
1. The teacher's perception of Permendikbud No. 10 of 2017 concerning the Protection of
Educators and Education Personnel in the City of Semarang is that teachers will feel safe and
comfortable when the candy can be realized as it should when teachers, education staff and
school principals when carrying out their duties.
2. The Role of Permendikbud No. 10 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Educators and
Education Personnel in protecting teachers is still not optimal, it is indicated that there are still
a number of teachers, educators and school principals who still have not received protection
from the Education Ministry.
Recomendations
Based on the results of the conclusions above, the suggestions that can be given in this study are:
1. Suggestions in this study are in conducting research to be more timely in the stages of research
in accordance with a predetermined schedule, so that coordination with various stakeholders
will be easier to do.
2. It is necessary to familiarize Permendikbud No 10 of 2017 concerning the Protection of
Educators and Education Personnel towards teachers, students and principals, so that all
activists in the world of education understand the regulations set in the candy so that no more
parties are harmed. 90
3. The need for commitment from several parties related to the implementation of Permendikbud
No. 10 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Educators and Education Personnel so that no
more parties feel less protected from the candy.
4. It is necessary to supervise the monitoring and evaluation system related to the implementation
of Permendikbud No. 10 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Educators and Education
Personnel, so that appropriate inputs can be obtained for future input related to the
implementation of the candy.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] Ardi, Minal. 2013. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Guru di Kota Pontianak (Studi Tentang
Implementasi Pasal 39 Ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan
Dosen)”. Jurnal: Edukasi, Vol. 11, No. 2.
[2] Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka
Cipta.

Proceeding International Seminar and workshop on Education (InSWEd)

Garut, West Java, Indonesia
17-18 February 2019 139
 InSWEd 2019

[3] Komara, Endang. 2016. “Perlindungan Profesi Guru di Indonesia”. Jurnal: Indonesia untuk
Kajian Pendidikan. ISSN 2527-3868 (print), 2503-457X (online).
[4] Miles, Matthew B dan A Michael Huberman.1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan
Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI PRESS.

[5] Moleong, Lexy. J. 2004. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
[6] Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) No. 38 Tahun 1992 tentang Tenaga Kependidikan
[7] Peraturan Pemerintah No. 74 tahun 2008 tentang Guru
[8] Permendikbud Nomor 10 Tahun 2017 tentang Perlindungan bagi Pendidik dan Tenaga
Kependidikan
[9] PP nomor 19 tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan (SNP), PP nomor 74 tahun
2008 tentang Guru.
[10] Puspini, Ni Luh Emi. 2013. “Perlindungan Hukum Organisasi Persatuan Guru Republik
Indonesia terhadap Profesi Guru dalam Tindak Pidana Pendididkan di Kabupaten Bangli
(Studi Kasus Perbuatan melawan Hukum Oleh Guru Terhadap Anak Didik di SMA Negeri
1 bangli Penyelesaian Melalui Jalan NonLitigasi Hukum). Jurnal: Pendidikan
Kewarganegaraan Undiksha. Vol 1 No. 5.
[11] Setiawan, Ris. 2017. “Perlindungan Guru yang Menjalankan Profesinya sebagai Pendidik di
Sekolah dapat Dituntut Pidana yang Dilaporkan oleh Wali Murid”. Jurnal: Hukum.
Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakara.
[12] Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian, Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & RND. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[13] Undang No. 13 tahun 2003 mengenai Tenaga Kerja dan Perjanjian Kerja
[14] Undang-Undang No 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional
[15] UU No. 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen

Proceeding International Seminar and workshop on Education (InSWEd)

Garut, West Java, Indonesia
17-18 February 2019 140