St.

Paul College San Rafael

Pantubig, San Rafael, Bulacan

“ THE EFFECTS OF ALLOWANCE RANGE ON THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

OF THE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS OF ST. PAUL COLLEGE, SAN RAFAEL BASED
ON THEIR GENDER”

A Research Paper

Presented to:

Mr. James Patrick Mahor

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

In Practical Research II

Franzel Marie Evangelista

Patricia Estelle Infantado

Jimbo Manalastas

Acknowledgment
 first of all we would like to thank our family for always being supportive of what we do.

Keeping us motivated everyday and letting us believe that we can do anything if we put our

hearts and minds to.

To Mr. James Patrick Mahor for being there when we need him, for his patience with us

and the efforts of accomodating us.

we also would like to extend our thanks to Sr. Norma Michaela S. Que, SPC., for

allowing us to conduct our research.

Also to our respondents for without them we would not be able to verify our research and

also to thank them for being patient and accommodating us.

and most of all to the Almighty God, who bestowed us knowledge and answered all our

prayers in the making of this research.

The Researchers
 Dedication

this research is dedicated to our family, teachers and friends, who taught us to be patient in what
were doing and letting us feel motivated For them who inspire us to do our best in this research
and being our inspirations in everything we do. Without them we would have not been able to
finsih this research.

.
 The Researchers
Approval Sheet

In partial fulfillment of the requirements for Practical Research II, this research titled

“RESEARCH TITLES”, has been prepared and submitted by Researcher 1, Researcher 2, and,

Researcher 3 who are hereby recommended for Oral Examination.

MR. JAMES PATRICK MAHOR

Adviser

Approved by the Panel of Oral Examiners with a grade of PASSED. Accepted and

approved as partial fulfillment of the requirements for English 10.

MS. JANINE BANATE MR. JAMES PATRICK MAHOR

Examiner STL, English
 Table of Contents

Title Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . … . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

Acknowledgment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

Dedication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii

Approval Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv

Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v

Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi

Chapter Page

1 THE PROBLEM AND REVIEW OF

RELATED LITERATURE

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Review of Related Literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Theoretical Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Paradigm of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Statement of the Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hypothesis of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Significance of the study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Scope and Limitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2 METHODS

Research Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Respondents of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Instrumentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 Data Gathering Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Statistical Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary of Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

APPENDICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 List of Tables

Table Page
 List of Figures

Figure Page

1 Paradigm of the Study 21