Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Disclaimer: This is an auto-generated simulation report. We are making all the effort to collect all important information
about your simulation and present them in this single document. However, it is a work in progress and might have some
discrepancies due to computer code interpretation of these simulations. We strongly recommend that the user review
these findings in detail, before using them for further workflow. You can always reach to us at
support@simulationhub.com for any assistance.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents 2
Simulation Details 4
Valve Details 5
Executive Summary 6
1 Background 10
2 Objective of Study 10
3 Control Valve Design 10
4 CFD Analysis Methodology 11
4.1 Fluid Volume Extraction and Simplifications 11
4.2 Mesh 11
4.3 Solver 12
4.4 Fluid Properties 12
4.5 Boundary Conditions 12
4.6 Assumptions for CFD Analysis 12
5 Results and Discussion 12
5.1 Quantitative Results 12
5.1.1 Valve Flow Coefficients, CV & KV 12
5.1.2 CV & KV Curve 13
5.1.3 Dynamic Torque Coefficient, Cdt 14
5.1.4 Dynamic Torque Coefficient (Cdt) Curve 15
5.2 Qualitative Results 16
5.2.1 Velocity Contours 16
5.2.2 Pressure Contours 18
Pressure drop
Angle of Flow Rate CV KV Cdt
Case (bar)
opening (°) (m 3 /hr)
Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net
1 10 179 1.00 1.00 207 207 179 179 -0.1606 0.1607
2 20 399 0.95 0.95 473 474 409 410 -0.1749 0.1754
3 30 691 0.97 0.95 813 820 703 709 -0.1622 0.1635
4 40 1,119 0.97 0.93 1,313 1,341 1,136 1,160 -0.1546 0.1579
5 50 1,685 1.00 0.91 1,950 2,044 1,687 1,768 -0.1581 0.1658
2 Objective of Study
The objective of this current study is to predict the CV, KV & Cdt value of control valve at 5 different opening
positions starting from 10° to 50°. This would also give an idea about the inherent characteristics of the control
valve. Following are the quantitative and qualitative objectives of the study.
Quantitative objective : To find the flow coefficients KV, CV and the dynamic torque coefficient Cdt at 5
opening positions from 10° to 50°
Qualitative objective : To extract velocity and pressure contours on volume cut section to get better
understanding of the flow physics
4.2 Mesh
A CFD model requires the fluid domain to be divided into discrete elements (made up of geometric primitives like
hexahedra and tetrahedral) or cells. The governing equations are then discretized and solved inside each of these
cells. The collection of all these elements or cells is called a mesh. The distribution of these mesh elements defines
the level of accuracy.
In the current model, appropriate element sizes have been selected to ensure an adequate number of cells to resolve
the geometry and flow field. A refined mesh has been used around the moving bodies, to increase the mesh density
in the areas of interest, to ensure the flow field has been accurately resolved. To capture the boundary layer
correctly, prism layers are created to generate flow aligned meshes on all the wall surfaces of the valve. Also, the
size of mesh near the wall is selected to maintain Y-plus value demanded by the turbulence model used.
CV KV
Case Angle Of Opening (°)
Gross Net Gross Net
1 10 207 207 179 179
2 20 473 474 409 410
3 30 813 820 703 709
4 40 1,313 1,341 1,136 1,160
5 50 1,950 2,044 1,687 1,768
Where :
Cdt = Coefficient of Dynamic Torque (Dimensionless)
Td = Dynamic torque, N-m
D = Valve diameter, m
∆P = Pressure drop across the valve, Pa
The dynamic torque coefficient estimated from the CFD analysis for the control valve geometry is tabulated below:
Cdt
Case Angle Of Opening (°)
Gross Net
1 10 -0.1606 0.1607
2 20 -0.1749 0.1754
3 30 -0.1622 0.1635
4 40 -0.1546 0.1579
5 50 -0.1581 0.1658
Velocity (m/s)
15.98
0.01
Figure: Velocity contours plotted on mid X plane for 10° opening
0.01
Figure: Velocity contours plotted on mid X plane for 20° opening
Velocity (m/s)
20.51
0.03
Figure: Velocity contours plotted on mid X plane for 30° opening
Velocity (m/s)
23.81
0.02
Figure: Velocity contours plotted on mid X plane for 40° opening
0.03
Figure: Velocity contours plotted on mid X plane for 50° opening
The velocity contours show the region of flow separation at the edge of rotating bodies. This flow separation is
more in the lower angles of opening due to the small flow region available for the fluid to reach an outlet. As the
angle of opening increases, the gap also increases and the flow separation is reduced.
Pressure (kPa)
1,001.18
786.52
Figure: Pressure contours plotted on mid X plane for 10° opening
Pressure (kPa)
1,001.24
792.61
Figure: Pressure contours plotted on mid X plane for 20° opening
692.41
Figure: Pressure contours plotted on mid X plane for 30° opening
Pressure (kPa)
1,048.73
633.81
Figure: Pressure contours plotted on mid X plane for 40° opening
Pressure (kPa)
1,112.77
528.49
Figure: Pressure contours plotted on mid X plane for 50° opening
Pressure contours plotted on the midplane shows the region of low pressure. The lowest pressure values are seen
more in the lower angles of the opening in comparison to higher angles of opening.
6 Summary
Flow across the control valve is simulated for 5 different valve openings, starting from 10° to 50°. CV, KV & Cdt
values are calculated for all the opening positions. Plotting CV & KV curve gives an idea of inherent valve
The friction factor ‘f’ for the pipe is calculated using the Colebrook-White equation
Where ‘ε’ is the pipe roughness, ‘D’ is the ID of the pipe, ‘Re’ is the Reynolds number and ‘L’ is the pipe length of
8 x diameter (nominal)