Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/344772853

Histological analysis of two biomaterials after socket preservation -Preliminary


histological findings

Poster · October 2020

CITATIONS READS

0 36

8 authors, including:

Matej Tomas Marija Čandrlić

1 PUBLICATION   0 CITATIONS   
University of Osijek
4 PUBLICATIONS   5 CITATIONS   
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE

Matej Karl Martina Juzbašić

4 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS   
Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Osijek
2 PUBLICATIONS   1 CITATION   
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Bone Regeneration View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Marko Matijević on 20 October 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


100       | ABSTRACTS

58 M B J e P OS TE R
B A S I C R E S E A RC H

Histological analysis of two biomaterials after socket preservation – Preliminary histological findings
Matej Tomas1; Marija Čandrlić1; Matej Karl1; Martina Juzbašić1; Nikola Matijević2; Željka Perić Kačarević1; Marko Matijević1
1
Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 2School of Dental Medicine Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Background: Following tooth extraction, the alveolar ridge undergoes dimensional changes. Various biomaterials are used to reduce alveolar
ridge volume loss following tooth extraction by stimulating new bone formation. Maxresorb® inject (Botiss Biomaterials GmbH, Germany) is a
biphasic material composed of a water-based gel with 60% HA and 40% β-TCP. BioOss® (Geistlich Pharma AG, Switzerland) is a porous bone
mineral matrix which is produced by removing all organic components from bovine bone.
Aim/Hypothesis: This study aimed to examine the regenerative potential of biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) (Maxresorb® inject), by assess-
ing histological results of bone biopsy collected from healing sockets and comparing them to inorganic bovine bone (BioOss®), after a healing
period of 6 months.
Materials and Methods: The study is designed as a randomized controlled, two - phase study. In the first phase, 30 patients that qualified for
participation in the research were divided randomly into 2 groups of 15 individuals. The bone substitute materials were implanted in extraction
sockets after teeth removal. The first group underwent tooth extractions and socket augmentation with Maxresorb® inject. In the other group
socket preservation was performed using BioOss®. In both groups, the sockets were covered by native collagen membrane. After 6 months
of healing, biopsy was harvested prior to implant placement for histological analysis. Histological sections were examined under the light
microscope.
Results: Preliminary results - The preliminary histological analysis revealed remaining BCP particles in intimate contact with the newly formed
bone in the case of Maxresorb® inject. Histological specimens of BioOss® observed under light microscope also showed incorporation of
the hydroxyapatite particles into the newly mineralized bone. In both materials, there were no histological signs of tissue inflammation.
Furthermore, both materials exhibited easy handling and patients had no complications during healing period.
Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Although a small number of patients were treated, along with the preliminary nature of this study,
histological findings indicate osteoconductive properties of both materials included in this study. However, additional research is required to
obtain histological and clinical features of Maxresorb® inject and BioOss® regarding their osteoconductive properties.
Keywords: extraction sockets, histology, dental implantology, xenograft, alloplastic material

View publication stats

S-ar putea să vă placă și