Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Introduction
Ancsthcttsts frcifucnlly provide It is common practice to use adjunctive neuromus-
tntraoperative musctc relaxation in addition cuiar biocking drugs during general anesthesia to
to general anesthesia. However, visual provide muscle relaxation. However, determining
interpretation of the effect of neuromuscular the degree of blockade can be difficult. The periph-
btockuig drugs is not always possible. eral nerve stimulator (PNS) is used to determine
This study examined two alternative the degree of residual muscle activity in the pres-
tnethods felectromvographv/electrocardiographv ence of neuromuscular blocking agents. In stan-
[EMG/ECG\ and mechanical/ECG) dard ciinicai anesthesia practice, the degree of neu-
of interpreting ucuromuscular btockade and romuscular blockade is visually evaluated through
compared these methods to vtsual interpretation of the evoked muscular response to
interpretation. EMG/ECG and the PNS. Interpretation of the evoked PNS response
mechanical/ECG ttiethodologies were found allows the anesthetist to titrate neuromuscular
io provide rctiabte valid intraoperative blocking drugs, thereby ensuring adequate muscle
interpretation of nondepolarizing relaxation as well as prompt reversal of neuromus-
neuromuscular btockade for single-twitch and cular blockade.' ^
train-of-four stimuli. Although visually monitoring the degree of
EMG/ECG and mechanical/ECG neuromuscular blockade is the clinical standard,
measures of neuromuscular hlockade were certain surgical procedures preclude visual access
performed with an electrocardiographic to the site stimulated hy the PNS. The research
monitor and a pressure transducer, problem addressed by this study involved the need
respectively. Both EMG/ECG and to validate alternative methods for monitoring the
mechanical/ECG. when compared to visual degree of neuromuscular blockade in patients for
interpretation, were found to be equally, and whom visual access is not available. The purpose of
usuatty more, vatid indicators of this study was to determine if two nonvisual mea-
neuromuscular blockade. The clinical sures (electromyography and mechanical) of
significance of this study is its nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade could be
contribution to ijuality care and patient safety. substituted and prove a reasonable alternative to
When visual monitoring of neuromuscutar visual interpretation of PNS stimuli.
btockade is not feasible, either EMG/ECG or The proposed alternative methods were devel-
mechantcal/ECa provide an alternative oped from concepts derived from a review of the
method of momtonng neuromuscular physiology of neuromuscular transmission and the
btockade. action of specific blocking agents. A review of that
material will be presented, followed by a discussion
84
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists
(1) to determine intraoperatively, during general lnins(lu(<'(l mcduinical prc.s.sun* waves. Methanical
anesthesia requiring nondepolarizing muscle re- interprelulioii (;l |)re,ssure was accomplished wilh a
laxation, the effectiveness of hoth of the proposed standard strain gauge pressure transducer (Gould
EMG/ECG and mech;niical/ECG methods of inler- P2.'iXL"'). Other materials included a dorsal sup-
preting PNS stimuli (when compared to visual in- port arm hoard for the wrist and hand, two 250 ml
terpretation); and (2) to show that the proposed bags of saline, one set of low pre.ssure and one set of
EN1G/ECG and mechanical/ECG interpretation high pressure intravenous(IV) tubing and one pres-
methods are reliable substitutes if visual interpreta- sure bag. Data interpretation was performed using
tion is impractical. the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).
• Procedure. Approval of the Cleveland Veter-
Methodology ans Administration Medical Center's human inves-
• Design and sample. A modified counterhal- tigational and Case Western Reserve University's
ance design was used, that is, visual evaluation of School of Nursing review boards was obtained. The
the response to a particular PNS stimulus served as study was explained in detail and informed consent
the control while simultaneous EMG/ECG and was obtained. The principal investigator's role was
mechanical/ECG responses to the satne stimulus limited to data collection. The investigator did not
were recorded.'-'Therefore, every PNS stimulus was serve as anesthetist for any subject and had no role
simultaneously evaluated hy visual, EMG/ECG and in selecting or administering anesthesia. General
mechanical/ECG methods. Since each PNS inter- anesthesia was provided using a balanced narcotic-
pretation method (visual, EMG/ECG and mechan- inhalation technique and adjunct nondepolarizing
ical/ECG) was performed simultaneously and acted muscle relaxant infusion. Normal core body tem-
as its own control, the dosage schedules and time perature was maintained.'^^-
periods of the nondepolarizing drugs did not have Prior to the induction of general anesthesia,
to be regulated. This allowed random sampling to each patient was prepared as in Figure 1. Once the
be done hefore, during and after the infusion of a patient was supine on the operating table, one arm
nondepolarizing muscle relaxant. All the suhjects was placed on a standard padded operating table
received an infusion: 11 subjects received atracu- arm board in a supine position with the palm up
rium (0.5 mg/cc) and 1 subject received vecuronium and the arm positioned at approximately 80 de-
(0.1 mg/cc). grees to the torso. Ulnar nerve stimulation of the
Four to six random simultaneous samples for adductor pollicis muscle was achieved by attaching
each subject were taken during the intraoperative thePNS at the elbow with two cutaneous electrodes;
period when different degrees of neuromuscular the negative electrode was placed at the ulnar notch
blockade existed. There was a total of 66 samples between the olecranon and medial epicondyle and
obtained for the 12 subjects. A sample consisted of the positive electrode was placed approximately
PNS stimuli administered in a prescribed order. one-inch distal to the negative electrode. Place-
Since the visual response to the PNS stimuli acted ment of the PNS electrodes distal to the elbow re-
as the control, the simultaneous responses of the sulted in recording the nerve stimulus rather than
EMG/ECG and mechanical/ECG were recorded the EMG, that is, there was a "leakage of PNS cur-
while each subject received a nondepolarizing mus- rent" which only permitted recording of the PNS
cle relaxant infusion. stimulus rather than recording the desired EMG
Subjects were 12 adult males, ASA Class II-III, activity. A sample consisted of PNS stimuli admin-
56-77 years old, 60-107 kilograms body weight with istered in the following order: TOF, single-twitch
no prior history of neuromuscular disease. All sub- stimulus, tetanic stimulus (50 Hz x 5 seconds) and
jects were scheduled for surgery at the Cleveland post-tetanic single-twitch stimulus. As previously
Veterans Administration Medical Center, were discussed, recommended time intervals among
given general anesthesia with adjunct nondepolar- stimuli and between samples were maintained.' '-
izing muscle relaxant drugs and were scheduled for Following placement of the PNS, the hand of the
surgical procedures which permitted visual, same arm was prepared to permit simultaneous
EMG/ECG and mechanical/ECG interpretation of EMG/ECG, mechanical/ECG and visual record-
ulnar nerve neuromuscular blockade. ing of the PNS stimuli.
• Apparatus/instruments. Ulnar nerve stimula- • Eleclromyography (EMG/ECG)procedure. With
tion was achieved using the Bard Critical Care the ECG monitoring lead II. the positive ECG lead
(Model 750 Digital®) peripheral nerve stimulator. was placed on the palmar surface of the thumb at
The Mennen ECG monitor (Model 742®), with lhe insertion of the adductor pollicis muscle, the
built-in strip recorder and ECG cable, was used to negative lead was placed on the palmar surface of
simultaneously observe and record the EMG and the index finger, and the ground lead was placed on
86
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists
Figure 2
Examples of EMG/ECG and mechanical/ECG waveforms^
EMG/ECG
A. Train-of-four
stimulation^
B, Pretetanic single-
twitch stimulation
C. Post-tetanic single-
twitch stimulation
Mechanical/ECG
D. Train-of-four
stimulation^
E. Pretetanic single-
twitch stimulation
F Ftost-tetanic single-
twitch stimulation
1. EMG/ECG and mechanical/ECG recordings were simultaneous on lead 11 and pressure setting of 25 torr, respectively
2. Visual saw only one of the four train-of-four stimuli.
muscular blockade. Cross tabulation comparing the EMG/ECG versus visual interpretation
number of individual stimuli simultaneously For response to the PNS single-twitch (pre- and
counted by the visual method versus the EMCJ/ECG post-tetanus) and TOF stimuli, there was perfect
method of PNS interpretation proved that the congruence between visual and EMG/ECG recog-
EMG/ECG method was just as accurate as visual nition of neuromuscular response (Table I). That
interpretation of the TOF stimulus (Figure 3). Com- is, each time the PNS stimulus was delivered to the
paring visual interpretation of the TOF stimulus ulnar nerve, the adductor pollicis muscle response
with simultaneously recorded mechanical/ECG in- visualized was also reflected in an oscilloscope de-
terpretation proved that the mechanical/FCG flection. However, the EMG/ECG and mechani-
method of interpretation was usually as accurate as cal/ECG methods frequently recorded responses to
visual interpretation of the TOF stimulus (Fiji;ure PNS stimuli (Table II and Figure 3) before these
4). same stimuli were able to be visually recognized.
88
Journat of the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists
Figure 3 Fjgure 4
The comparison of the visual and electromyography Visually observed versus mechanical/ECG recorded
(EMG/ECG) responses to train-of-four stimulation responses to the train-of-four stimulation
8 13 r
7 15 3 18 2'
Number of Number of
responses responses
recognized 1 8 6 recognized 3 4
by EMG/ECG by mechani-
cal/ECG
4 2 5
1 1 15 15