Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
View Journal
PCCP
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Accepted Manuscript
This article can be cited before page numbers have been issued, to do this please use: M. Mansø, M. D.
Kilde, S. K. Singh, P. Erhart, K. Moth-Poulsen and M. B. Nielsen, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, DOI:
10.1039/C8CP07744D.
Volume 18 Number 1 7 January 2016 Pages 1–636 This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the
Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been
accepted for publication.
PCCP
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after
www.rsc.org/pccp
rsc.li/pccp
Page 1 of 7 PleaseChemistry
Physical do not adjust margins
Chemical Physics
ARTICLE
causes remarkabe redshifts of various N derivatives. Thus, some derivatives were found to absorb light with an absorption
onset up to 556 nm. The incorporation of DTF units come, however, with a drawback in regard to achieving reversible N-
to-Q and Q-to-N isomerizations. For some derivatives, the photoisomerization was completely quenched. The compounds
were subjected to a computational study to shed light on the underlying reason for this reluctance to undergo
photoisomerization. The computational study revealed that in these systems, the first excited state (S1) is positioned close
to or lower than the transition state for photoconversion, effectively blocking a possible conversion to Q, thus revealing a
practical challenge for future design of N-Q energy storage systems with improved solar spectrum match.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 1
literature procedures. The aldehyde 1 was reacted in a Horner- View Article Online
Wadsworth-Emmons reaction with the known phosphonate ester DOI: 10.1039/C8CP07744D
417 using sodium hexamethyldisilazide (NaHMDS) as base to give
the DTF functionalized trimethylsilyl (TMS) end-capped alkyne 5.
Compound 6 incorporating two TMS protected alkynes was
Table 1: Absorption maxima and onsets for the DTF-norbornadienes and the
unsubstituted norbornadiene.
2 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3
which occurs at a similar wavelength as for the initial state photoswitching was rationalized in a computational Viewstudy. For
Article Online
(NN), creates an excited state that cannot overcome the the compounds containing two norbornadiene units, the
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP07744D
barrier to the fully switched configuration (NQ->QQ) and transition state on the ground state energy surface between
rather relaxes by back-conversion to the initial state (NQ->NN). NQ and QQ was found to be of higher energy than the energy
This provides a simple rationale for the failure to switch these of first excited state. This prevents the second
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
53%). TLC (10% CH2Cl2/Heptane): Rf = 0.33. 1H NMR (500 MHz, phases were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in
View Article Online
CDCl3): δ = 2.87 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 4H), 1.33 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 6H), 0.22 vacuo. Small amounts of 80% CH2Cl2/Heptane were added, and
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP07744D
(s, 18H) ppm. 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 158.05, 129.79, the precipitate was filtered off. The filtrate was concentrated
103.10, 100.19, 87.46, 30.67, 15.10, 0.18 ppm. HR-MS (MALDI+ and purified by flash column chromatography (80%
FT-ICR, dithranol): m/z = 428.06200 [M·+], calcd. for CH2Cl2/Heptane) furnishing 11 as an orange solid (144 mg,
126.61, 120.95, 114.86, 105.14, 95.27, 53.60, 53.46, 0.12 ppm. THF/MeOH (10 mL, 1:1) was added K2CO3 (87 mg, 0.63 mmol),
HR-MS (ESI+ FT-ICR): m/z = 405.06596 [M+H+], calcd. for and the mixture was stirred at rt for 45 min. The mixture was
[C19H21O4S2Si+]: m/z = 405.06450. poured into water (100 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 x 30
Compound 10: To a solution of 5 (60 mg, 197 μmol) in mL). The combined organic phases were dried over MgSO4,
THF/MeOH (10 mL, 1:1) was added K2CO3 (41 mg, 297 μmol) filtered and almost concentrated in vacuo, before Et3N (20 mL)
and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at rt. The mixture was was added, and the mixture was concentrated to
poured into H2O (50 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 x 30 mL). approximately 10 mL. THF (10 mL) and 2-chloro-3-
The combined organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, filtered cyanonorbornadiene (106 mg, 0.699 mmol) were added, and
and almost concentrated in vacuo. Et3N (20 mL) was added, the mixture was flushed with argon. Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (9 mg, 13
and the mixture was concentrated to approximately 10 mL. μmol) and CuI (4 mg, 21 μmol) were added, and the mixture
THF (10 mL) and 2-chloro-3-cyanonorbornadiene (90 mg, 594 was stirred for 22h at rt. The reaction mixture was poured into
μmol) were added, and the mixture was argon-flushed. H2O and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 x 50 mL). The combined
Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (10 mg, 14 μmol) and CuI (4 mg, 21 μmol) were organic phases were dried over MgSO4, filtered and
added, and the mixture was stirred for 3.5 h. H2O (100 mL) was concentrated in vacuo. Flash column chromatography (70%
added before the mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 x 30 CH2Cl2/Heptane) followed by size exclusion chromatography
mL). The combined organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, (SX3, CH2Cl2) gave 12 (35 mg, 54%) and 13 (9 mg, 18%). 12:
filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Flash column M.p.: 114–118 °C. TLC (70% CH2Cl2/Heptanes) = 0.47. 1H NMR
chromatography (60% CH2Cl2/Heptane) furnished 10 as a dark (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.87 (dd, J = 5.0, 3.0 Hz, 2H), 6.84–6.82
orange thick oil (45 mg, 66%). TLC (60% CH2Cl2/Heptanes): Rf = (m, 2H), 3.91–3.85 (m, 2H), 3.87–3.81 (m, 2H), 2.93 (q, J = 7.3
0.31. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.85 (dd, J = 5.0, 3.1 Hz, Hz, 4H), 2.29 (dt, J = 7.0, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 2.20 (dt, J = 7.0, 1.6 Hz,
1H), 6.80 (dd, J = 5.0, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (s, 1H), 3.88–3.85 (m, 2H), 1.33 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 6H) ppm. 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ =
1H), 3.76–3.74 (m, 1H), 2.48 (s, 3H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 2.27 (dt, J = 164.82, 164.81, 153.13, 142.36, 141.17, 131.02, 126.13,
7.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 2.18 (dt, J = 7.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR 117.01, 103.33, 92.51, 85.00, 72.47, 72.46, 56.97, 54.10, 30.74,
(126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 153.64, 153.38, 142.40, 140.98, 129.85, 15.15. ppm. (The two peaks at 72.47 and 72.46, as well as the
125.51, 124.59, 117.21, 106.43, 94.38, 90.98, 72.18, 57.04, two peaks at 164.82 and 164.81 split up due to
53.89, 19.15, 18.96 ppm. HR-MS (MALDI+ FT-ICR): m/z = diastereoisomers.) HR-MS (MALDI+ FT-ICR): m/z = 514.06586
346.99295 [M·+], calcd. for [C16H13NS4+]: m/z = 346.99253. [M·+], calcd. for [C28H22N2S4+]: m/z = 514.06603. 13: TLC (70%
Compound 11: To a solution of 9 (301 mg, 744 μmol) in CH2Cl2/Heptanes) = 0.53. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.87
THF/MeOH (40 mL, 1:1) was added K2CO3 (402 mg, 2.91 (dd, J = 5.1, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (dd, J = 5.1, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 3.89 –
mmol), and the mixture was stirred at rt for 20 min. The 3.87 (m, 1H), 3.83 – 3.80 (m, 1H), 2.94 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.90
mixture was passed through a plug of silica (40-63 μm, CH2Cl2) (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (dt, J = 7.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 2.20 (dt, J = 7.1,
and nearly concentrated in vacuo. Et3N (25 mL) was added, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 1.34 (br. t, J = 7.3 Hz, 6H) ppm. 13C NMR (126
and the mixture was concentrated to approximately 15 mL in MHz): δ = 164.23, 153.10, 142.38, 141.15, 132.76, 128.81,
vacuo. Freshly distilled THF (15 mL) and 2-chloro-3- 126.23, 117.01, 103.45, 93.15, 84.88, 82.21, 80.87, 72.45,
cyanonorbornadiene (76 mg, 501 μmol) were added, and the 56.93, 54.09, 30.90, 30.67, 15.20, 15.10 ppm. HR-MS (MALDI+
mixture was flushed with argon. Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (56 mg, 80 μmol) FT-ICR): m/z = 796.03283 [M·+], calcd. for [C40H32N2S8+]: m/z =
and CuI (15 mg, 79 μmol) were added, and the mixture was 796.03257.
stirred for 6 h. The mixture was poured into water (100 mL)
and extracted with CH2Cl2 (4 x 100 mL). The combined organic
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 5
Computational methods. Molecular geometries (on the S0 10 M. Quant, A. Lennartsson, A. Dreos, M. Kuisma,View P. Article
Erhart, K.
Online
landscape) were optimized at the density functional theory Börjesson and K. Moth-Poulsen, Chem. Eur. J., 2016, 22,
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP07744D
13265.
(DFT) level. Optical properties and the excited (S1) energy 11 M. Bryce, Adv. Mater. 1999, 11, 11–23.
landscape were evaluated using time dependent density 12 M. Å. Petersen, L. Zhu, S. H. Jensen, A. S. Andersson, A.
functional theory (TDDFT) at fixed geometries. These Kadziola, K. Kilså and M. B. Nielsen, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007,
nudged elastic band method while the biradical character of 19 M. Sato, N. C. Gonnella and M. P. Cava, J. Org. Chem., 1979,
the transition state was modeled using broken-symmetry 44, 930.
unrestricted DFT calculations.31,32 S0 energies were then 20 (a) P. Hapiot, D. Lorcy, A. Tallec, R. Carlier and A. Robert, J.
obtained by evaluation of the ground state energy using DFT Phys. Chem., 1990, 100, 14823; (b) A. J. Moore, M. R. Bryce,
P. J. Skabara, A. S. Batsanov, L. M. Goldenberg and J. A. K.
for the initial, final, and transition states. The corresponding S1 Howard, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1, 1997, 3443.
energies were subsequently determined by adding the first 21 K. Börjesson, A. Lennartson and K. Moth-Poulsen, ACS
excitation energy from TDDFT calculations at fixed molecular Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2013, 1, 585.
geometry. 22 M. Mansø, A. U. Petersen, Z. Wang, P. Erhart, M. B. Nielsen
and K. Moth-Poulsen, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 1945.
23 M. Mansø, B. E. Tebikachew, K. Moth-Poulsen and M. B.
Nielsen, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2018, 16, 5585.
Conflicts of interest 24 (a) A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 5648; (b) C. Lee, W.
There are no conflicts to declare. Yang and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 37, 785.
25 T. Yanai, D. P. Tew, and N. C. Handy, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2004,
393, 51.
26 M. Valiev, E. J. Bylaska, N. Govind, K. Kowalski, T. P.
Acknowledgements Straatsma, H. J. J. van Dam, D. Wang, J. Nieplocha, E. Apra, T.
University of Copenhagen is acknowledged for financial L. Windus and W. A. de Jong, Comput. Phys. Commun., 2010,
181, 1477.
support. 27 A. D. McLean and G. S. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys., 1980, 72,
5639.
28 R. Krishnan, J. S. Binkley, R. Seeger and J. A. Pople, J. Chem.
Notes and references Phys., 1980, 72, 650.
29 M. J. Kuisma, A. M. Lundin, K. Moth-Poulsen, P. Hyldgaard
1 T. J. Kucharski, Y. Tian, S. Akbulatov and R. Boulatov, Energy
and P. Erhart, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 3635.
Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 4449.
30 M. Quant, A. Lennartson, A. Dreos, M. Kuisma, P. Erhart, K.
2 K. Moth-Poulsen, D. Ćoso, K. Börjesson, N. Vinokurov, S. K.
Börjesson and K. Moth-Poulsen, Chem. Eur. J., 2016, 22,
Meier, A. Majumdar, K. P. C. Vollhardt and R. A. Segalman,
13265.
Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 8534.
31 K. Jorner, A. Dreos, R. Emanuelsson, O. E. Bakouri, I. F.
3 L. Dong, Y. Feng, L. Wang and W. Feng, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
Galván, K. Börjesson, F. Feixas, R. Lindh, B. Zietz, K. Moth-
2018, 47, 7339.
Poulsen and H. Ottosson, J. Mat. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 12369.
4 A. Lennartson, A. Roffey and K. Moth-Poulsen, Tetrahedron
32 M. Jevric, A. U. Petersen, M. Mansø, S. K. Singh, Z. Wang, A.
Lett., 2015, 56, 1457.
Dreos, C. Sumby, M. B. Nielsen, K. Börjesson, P. Erhart and K.
5 K. J. Spivack, J. V. Walker, M. J. Sanford, B. R. Rupert, A. R.
Moth-Poulsen, Chem. Eur. J., 2018, 24, 1.
Ehle, J. M. Tocyloski, A. N. Jahn, L. M. Shaak, O. Obianyo, K.
M. Usher and F. E. Goodson, J. Org. Chem., 2017, 82, 1301.
6 M. Kuisma, A. Lundin, K. Moth-Poulsen, P. Hyldgaard and P.
Erhart, ChemSusChem, 2016, 9, 1786.
7 E. Vessally and S. Aryana, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2016, 90,
136.
8 A. Dreos, K. Börjesson, Z. Wang, A. Roffey, Z. Norwood, D.
Kushnir and K. Moth-Poulsen, Energy Environ. Sci., 2017, 10,
728.
9 V. Gray, A. Lennartsson, P. Ratanalert, K. Börjesson and K.
Moth-Poulsen, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 5330.
6 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx