Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
3
Market Transformation Opportunities
pp
HARD Armor SOFT Armor
Personnel protection
Personnel protection
Body armor inserts
Helmets body armor
Shields Gloves
Anti-mine shoes, leg protection, … Clothes
Armored vehicles
Light vehicles
Ballistic panels for floor, door, bodywork, roof, interior armor ...
Cash in transit, ambulance,…
Law enforcement, Army : car, 4x4, hummer, van, truck …
Civilian: VIP car, 4x4, limousine, …
Heavy vehicles
Ballistic panels for military vehicles. External & internal armor
Tank, char, wheeled vehicle, tracked vehicle
Armored aerial vehicles
Helicopters : floor, seat (panels), cockpit…
Aircraft : cockpit doors
doors, seat
seat, …
Armored marine vehicles
Submarine
Shipboard : bridge, compartment, …
Fixed structure
Ballistic panels for structural parts
Bank counter, prison, bridge, shelter, vulnerable building (embassy,
airport,…)
4
Mobilityy & Lethalityy drives solution
High
• Marine Deckhouses
• Homeland Security • Marine Hull Components
• Bridges / Infrastructure • Coast Guard
• Embassies • Battlefield ISO Shelters
Low
Low High
Ballistic Lethality
5
History of Composite Vehicles
Functional Requirements
• weight (lighter) • structural
performance
• range of protection
levels • fire performance
• ballistic and blast • Electromagnetic
performance properties
• damage tolerance • maintainability
• affordability
Monocoque
Protection Performance
P f
Performance D
Drivers
i P l d
Payload
7
Design Drivers
Ballistic energy absorbing fracture mechanisms may be
combined within same armor systems to meet requirements of
different threats.
This combination is based on:
¾ Weight
W i ht limitation
li it ti
¾ Space constraints
¾ Structural role
¾ Environment (moisture,FST)
¾ Type of projectile(s)
¾ Need for single shot or multi-hit capability
And usuallyy leads to armor systems
y which are based on
multimaterials, multilayer arrangements, each providing a
specific functionality.
8
Maximize energy absorption in composite integral armor
while maintaining structural properties
9
Tailoring Composite Performance
Fiber design
Interphase & Enhancement of
thermodynamic compressive
effects strength
Micromechanical
Characterization Optimum Composites
•Energy Absorption for Desired Properties
Strain Rate
•Strain • Ballistic
•Durability • Structure
• Durability
10
Material Choices for Armor Protection
• Shieldstrand® ((High
g Strength
g Glass Fiber))
• Aramid fiber
• UHMWPE fiber
• Ballistic nylon fiber
• Ceramics
• Steel
• Aluminum
• Titanium
11
Effectiveness vs. selected threats
Material System
Projectile
j Velocity
y Al Steel Aramid Shield Ceramic
Km/s
strand
Ball 0.9
Sabot-light AP 1.1
F
Fragment
t simulating
i l ti 05
0.5
High velocity KE 2+
14
ShieldStrand® Enables Lightweight
Composite Armor Affordability
$60.00
$50.00 UHMWPE
$40 00
$40.00
ost ($/lb)
$30.00
Co
$20.00
Aramid/Phenolic
S-2 Glass®
$10 00
$10.00 ShieldStrand® S
ShieldStrand® Advantex® (E-glass)
5083 AL RHA Steel
$-
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Weight required to meet MIL-DTL-64154B (lbs/sf)
15
ShieldStrand® Offers the opportunity for
Hybridization with other materials for Optimum
Solution
7000
6000
0 (ft/s)
5000
Ballistiic Limit V50
4000
3000
0.25"AL5083/ ShieldStrand/ 0.25"RHA
2000 ShieldStrand/ 0.25"RHA
ShieldStrand VE
RHA
ShieldStrand/HB2 50/50AD
1000 ShieldStrand VE/ Spectra3124/EPS/0.14"RHA
0.50"AluminaRE/ShieldStrand/0.14"RHA
0.4"Alumina/ShieldStrand VE/AL Foam
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
2
Areal Density (lb/ft )
Data shown for comparative purposes only and should not be construed
as a guaranty or warranty of performance. Absolute performance will vary
by resin system or process 16
Integrated
g Structural Armor
ShieldStrand® is making new armor solutions
p
possible
• The strength of ShieldStrand® provides structure
as well as protection, allowing armor to be
integrated into the vehicle structure, reducing
overall vehicle weight
• Shi
ShieldStrand®
ldSt d® can be b molded
ld d iinto
t llarge complex-
l
shaped structural parts using proven large scale
composite manufacturing technologies.
• ShieldStrand® has been tested in combination
with a steel or ceramic strike face to provide
protection
t ti when h armor piercing
i i and d multi
lti hit
capability is required or an overmatched threat
exists. 17
ShieldStrand® Armor Solutions for Blast
and Multi
Multi-hit
hit Fragmentation Performance
• Offers good performance in blast – structurally
goodd with
ith minimal
i i l global
l b lddeflection
fl ti
• Local Deflection with Large Fragments
• FR Vinylester ShieldStrand V-hull passed blast
& full scale diesel fuel fire test
• Minimal secondary behind armor effects – V-hull
V hull
vents Blast, Composite stops fragmentation,
while structure absorbs Blast energy and
Force vs. Time
dissipates shock
shock.
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
Force (lbss)
3000
2000
1000
0
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035
-1000
-2000
Time (s) 18
ShieldStrand® Phenolic Plate:
Provides structure as well as protection
Elastic Constants 106 PSI Ultimate Strains %
Longitudinal
g Modulus D3039, D638 3.5 - 4.6 Longitudinal
g Tension D3039, D638 1.5 - 4
Transverse Modulus D3039, D638 3.5 - 4.6 Longitudinal Compression D3410, D695 0.7 - 2
Axial Shear Modulus D3518 0.5 - 0.7 Transverse Tension D3039, D638 1.5 - 4
Axial Comp Modulus D695 5.2 - 6.7 Transverse Compression D3410, D695 0.7 - 2
Poisson's Ratio D3039 0.24 - 0.27 In-Plane Shear D3518 2 - 2.5
Data shown for comparative purposes only and should not be construed
as a guaranty or warranty of performance. Absolute performance will vary
by resin system or process 19
Shieldstrand® Solution Case Histories
MRAP JLTV
FCS
Integrated
HMMWV MRAP EFP Kit Structural
Spall Liner
Cab
Composite
V-hull
Frag 5 Door Kit
Weight + - + ++ +++
Cost ++ +++ + - --
Structural Capability + ++ + - --
Part thickness + ++ + - --
(thin is +)
Resistance to acid ++ - ++ + -
and chemical attack
Fire, Smoke and + ++ + + -
Toxicity
Temperature + ++ + + -
Resistance