Standardizing the Signaries

The Encryption and Decryption of Alphabets

Joannes Richter

Signary (“alphabet”) Central Triad of Letters Remarks

(inside the cartouche)
Hebrew alphabet I10-Ε5-V6 The Great Name I-H-V
Ugaritic alphabet Y11, Ḫ4, W7 Cuneiform (transliterated)
Early Greek alphabet I-E-F, respectively I-E-Y F = digamma (→ U,V,W,Y)
Latin alphabet I-E-V, respectively I-E-U F = digamma (→ U,V,W)
Younger Futhark Signary I-H-U U = the U from Futhark
Elder Futhark Signary I-G-U U = the U from Futhark
Staveless runes Signary I-Æ-U U = the U from Futhark
Table 1 Central Triads of Letters inside the cartouche of the standardized alphabets

Abstract
In the course of time the core “Futhark” of the first 6 letters (Futhark, Futhorc, Futhrk) remained
remarkable stable and never really changed its pattern, which comes close to the same
categorization (“linguals, palatals, gutturals, labials, dentals”) according to the Name of the Indo-
European sky-god D-I-A-U-S.
Although the runic alphabets (both Futharks and the Staveless Runes) seemed to share the same
categorization of the abecedaria their literal order “F-U-Th-A-R-K” could not be understood and
does not match the standard A-B-C-D-.. sequence.
A problem arose from the first two letters, which both ought to be identified as labials. The dual
characterized couple “F”-”U” of letters could not be solved in the structure of Flinders Petrie's
“periodical tables”.
A standardization of the runic alphabets however turned out to be successful. All investigated
alphabets (Ugaritic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Futhark, Futhorc, Futhrk) turned out to display a similar
“sacred” core of 3 vowels at the center of cartouche in the standardized alphabetic array of letters.
The central triads of letters inside the cartouche of the standardized alphabets are identified as a
common pattern: palatal – guttural - labial (such as I10-Ε5-V6, Y11, Ḫ4, W7, I-E-Y, I-E-U, I-H-U, I-G-
U, I-Æ-U).
Introduction
Obviously the Elder & Younger Futhark as well as the staveless runes could not be interpreted as
standard abecedaria. The runic signaries also could not be transformed to periodical tables.
Although the runic (Futhark, Futhorc and the Staveless) alphabets seemed to share the same
categorization of the abecedaria their literal order “F-U-Th-A-R-K” could not be understood.
In the course of time the core “Futhark” of the first 6 letters (Futhark, Futhorc, Futhrk) remained
remarkable stable and never really changed its pattern, which came close to the same categorization
linguals, palatals, gutturals, labials, dentals) according to the Indo-European sky-god D-I-A-U-S.
A problem arose from the first two letters, which usually are identified as labials. The initial couple
of letters “F”-”U” at the Futhark-signaries could not be explained in the structure of Flinders
Petrie's periodical tables.
The standardization of the runic alphabets however turned out to be successful 1. All investigated
alphabets (Ugaritic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Futhark, Futhorc, Futhrk) turned out to display a sacred
core of 3 vowels at the center of cartouche in the standardized alphabetic array of letters.
The method to standardize the Ugaritic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin and Futhark alphabets is simple. We
may categorize each letter and fill a table with the letters for each category according to their
standard order in the alphabet. The letters of the alphabet are inserted in the five columns, which in
this order also represent the representative letters of the Indo-European sky-god D-I-A-U-S.
Both the Younger and Elder Futhark as well as the staveless runes could be standardized, resulting
in the deities TIEUS, TIEU or TIU, TIW, respectively DIÆUS, DIÆU , or DIEUS, DIEU or DIU,
DIW.
The central triads of letters inside the cartouche of the standardized alphabets are identified as a
common pattern: palatal – guttural - labial (such as I10-Ε5-V6, Y11, Ḫ4, W7, I-E-Y, I-E-U, I-H-U, I-G-
U, I-Æ-U).
These letter combinations inside the cartouche may have been used to form the personal pronouns
(“ego”) of the first person singular. Several languages such as Provencal and some Romansh
dialects also use IEU (respectively IAU and IOU) as personal pronouns (“ego”) of the first person
singular. These patterns may be generated by standardizing the signaries.

1 Another View on the Sefer Yetzirah

Standardizing of the Signaries
Having standardized the Hebrew alphabet I also thought of standardizing the Futhark signaries. The
method to standardize the Hebrew alphabet is simple. We may categorize each letter and fill a table
with the letters for each category according to their standard order in the alphabet.

The Standardizing of the Hebrew alphabet

The categories in the Hebrew alphabet may be sorted as follows:
• linguals: D4, T9, L12, N14, T22
• palatals: G3, I10, Ch11, K19
• gutturals: Æ1, Ε5, H8, Gh16
• labials: B2, V6, M13, Ph17
• dentals: Z7, S15, Ts18, R20, S21
These letters are inserted in the five columns, which in this order also represent the representative
letters of the Indo-European sky-god D-I-A-U-S:

linguals palatals gutturals labials dentals

1 Dalet D4 Gimel G3 Aleph Æ1 Bet B2 Zayin Z7
2 Teth T9 Samekh S15
Yodh I10 He Ε5 Waw V6
3 Lamedh L12 Kaph Ch11 Heth H8 Mem M13 Tsade Ts18
4 Nun N14 Qoph K19 Ayin Gh16 Pe Ph17 Resh R20
5 Taw T22 Shin S21

Table 2: The Standardizing of the Hebrew alphabet which locates the Great Name I10-Ε5-V6 inside
the cartouche (D4, G3, Æ1 , B2, Z7, S15, Ts18, M13, H8, Ch11, L12, T9) of the Hebrew alphabet
The Standardizing of the Ugaritic alphabet
We may use the 5 standard columns for the Ugaritic alphabet: linguals, palatals, gutturals, labials,
dentals
1. The 6 linguals are D5, Ṭ10, L14, Ḏ16, N17, T27, 5 of which are found in the Hebrew alphabet:
Dalet (‫ד‬, D5), Teth (‫ט‬, Ṭ10), Lamedh (‫ל‬, L14), Nun (‫נ‬, N17), Taw (‫ת‬, Th27).
2. The 5 palatals are G3, Y11, K12, Q13, Ġ26, 4 of which are also found in the Hebrew alphabet:
Gimel (‫ג‬, G3), Yodh (‫י‬, I11 ), Kaph (‫כ‬, Ch12), Qoph (‫ק‬, K13).
3. The central guttural pillar is filled with the 6 gutturals: ʾA1, Ḫ4, H6, Ḥ9, ʿ(O)20, ʾI28, 4 of
which are also found in the Hebrew alphabet: “Aleph (‫א‬, A1), He (‫ה‬, E6), Heth (‫ח‬, H9), ‘Ayin
(‫ע‬, Gh20 ).
4. The 5 labials are B2, W7, M15, P21, 'U29, 4 of which are found in the Hebrew alphabet: Bet (‫ב‬,
B2), Waw (‫ו‬, W7), Mem (‫מ‬, M15), Pe (‫פ‬, Ph21 ).
5. The 8 dentals are Z8, Š13, Ẓ18, S19, Ṣ22, R24, Ṯ25, S230, 5 of which are found in Hebrew: Zayin (
‫ז‬, Z8), Samekh (‫ס‬, S19), Tsade (‫צ‬, Ts22), Resh (‫ר‬, R24), Shin (‫ש‬, Sh25).
The central keyword at the 2 nd line is Y11, Ḫ4. W7, which matches the Great Name I10-Ε5-V6 in the
Hebrew alphabet. The name of the sky-god D5, Y11, Ḫ4. W7, S19 represents all 5 categories.

linguals palatals gutturals labials dentals

1 D5 G3 ʾA1 B2 Z8
2 Ṭ10 Y11 Ḫ4 W7 Š13
3 L14 K12 H6 M15 Ẓ18
4 Ḏ16 Q13 Ḥ9 P21 S19
5 N17 Ġ26 ʿ(O)20 'U29 Ṣ22
6 T27 ʾI28 R24
7 Ṯ25
8 S230
Table 3 Ugaritic abecedaria of the "Northern Semitic order"
categorized in lingual, palatal, guttural, labial, and dental
(All indices in this chapter refer to the Ugaritic abecedaria)

In the Ugaritic abecedaria of the "Northern Semitic order" the Great Name “YHW” is highlighted
yellow in a central frame. The surrounding cartouche is highlighted by a blue line. The letters are D-
G-Ḫ-B-Z-Š-S-M-Ḥ-K-L-Ṯ. This cartouche largely matches the surrounding borderline (D4, G3, Æ1 ,
B2, Z7, S15, Ts18, M13, H8, Ch11, L12, T9) of the cartouche in the Hebrew alphabet. The alpha however
is positioned at the very top of the alphabet to find a location for the letter Ḫ4.
The colored sections refer to the letters which are identified in the Hebrew alphabet. In the
uncolored section we find the 8 letters (ḫ, š, ḏ, ẓ, ġ, ʾi, ʾu, s2) which are missing in the Hebrew
alphabet.
The Standardizing of the Greek alphabet
The Greek alphabet may be sorted as follows:
• linguals: Δ, Θ, Λ, N, T
• palatals: Γ, I, K, Q
• gutturals: A, E, H, O
• labials: B, F, M, Π, Φ, Y, Ω
• dentals: Ζ, Ξ, “M”, P, Σ
The early Greek alphabets seemed to have inherited the perfect structure of the cartouche (D4, G3,
Æ1 , B2, Z7, S15, Ts18, M13, H8, Ch11, L12, T9) of the Hebrew alphabet.
Additionally the letters Chi X, Phi Φ, Upsilon Y and Omega Ω had to be inserted.
The alphabet displays the core I - E - Y for the sky-god's name at the center of the cartouche.

linguals palatals gutturals labials dentals

1 delta Δ gamma Γ alpha A beta B zeta Ζ
2 theta Θ iota I epsilon E digamma F xi Ξ
(F → Y)
3 lambda Λ kappa K eta H mu M san (“M”)
4 nu N qoppa Q omicron O pi Π rho P
5 tau T sigma Σ
6 Phi Φ
7 Upsilon Y
8 Omega Ω Chi X
Table 4 Corresponding letters in the Early Greek alphabet

This concept generates the divine Names ΔIEYΣ, respectively ΔIOYΣ or ΔIAYΣ.
The Standardizing of the Latin alphabet
The Latin alphabet may be sorted as follows:
• linguals: D, L, N, T
• palatals: C, I, J, K, Q, X, Y
• gutturals: A, E, H, O
• labials: B, F, M, P, U, V, W, Y
• dentals: G, R, S, Z
The Latin alphabet lost 4 letters theta Θ , zeta Ζ, xi Ξ, San. The missing sectors are colored gray.
Additionally the letters J, G, U, V, W, X, Y, Z had to be inserted.
The alphabet displays the core I - E - U for the sky-god's name at the center of the cartouche.

linguals palatals Gutturals labials dentals

1 delta D gamma C alpha A beta B
2 iota I, J epsilon E digamma F G
(U,V,W,Y)
3 lambda L kappa K eta H mu M
4 nu N qoppa Q omicron O pi P rho R
5 tau T sigma S
6 U, V, W
7 X, Y Z
Table 5 Corresponding letters in the Latin alphabet (26 letters)

This concept generates the divine Names DIEUS, respectively DIOUS or DIAUS.
The Germanic signaries
Obviously the Elder & Younger Futhark and the staveless runes could not be interpreted as standard
abecedaria. The runic signaries also could not be transformed to periodical tables.
Although the runic (Futhark, Futhorc and the Staveless) alphabets seemed to share the same
categorization of the abecedaria their literal order “F-U-Th-A-R-K” could not be understood.
In the course of time the core “Futhark” of the first 6 letters (Futhark, Futhorc, Futhrk) remained
remarkable stable and never really changed its pattern, which came close to the same categorization
linguals, palatals, gutturals, labials, dentals) according to the Indo-European sky-god D-I-A-U-S.
A problem arose from the first two letters, which ought to be identified as labials. The dual
characterized couple “F”-”U” of letters could not be explained in the structure of Flinders Petrie's
periodical tables.
The standardization of the runic alphabets however turned out to be successful. All investigated
alphabets (Ugaritic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Futhark, Futhorc, Futhrk) turned out to display a sacred
core of 3 vowels at the center of cartouche in the standardized alphabetic array of letters.
Central Triad of Letters inside the cartouche of the standardized alphabets is a central section filled
with a combination: palatal – guttural - labial (such as I10-Ε5-V6):
Signary (“alphabet”) Central Triad of Letters Remarks
(inside the cartouche)
Hebrew alphabet I10-Ε5-V6 The Great Name
Ugaritic alphabet Y11, Ḫ4, W7 Cuneiform (transliterated)
Early Greek alphabet I-E-F, respectively I-E-Y F = digamma (→ U,V,W,Y)
Latin alphabet I-E-V, respectively I-E-U F = digamma (→ U,V,W)
Younger Futhark Signary I-H-U U = the U from Futhark
Elder Futhark Signary I-G-U U = the U from Futhark
Staveless runes Signary I-Æ-U U = the U from Futhark
Table 6 Central Triad of Letters inside the cartouche of the standardized alphabets
The basic structure of the standardized alphabet may be illustrated with the following pattern of the
cartouche filled with I-H-U in the Younger Futhark signary:

linguals palatals gutturals labials dentals

1 Þ …. A …. ….
2 N I H U S
3 T …. Æ …. ….
4 ... …. .... …. ….
Table 7: The location of the Great Name I-H-U at the center
of the cartouche in the Younger Futhark signary
Notes to the staveless runes - “Futhrk”
No ą rune has been found in inscriptions of the stave-less runes, but it has been postulated that it
was a mirrored form of the b rune due to pairings indicated in the stave-less runes.[3] (Source:
Staveless runes/Helsinger runes – Hälsingland. The earliest mention of the people of Hälsingland
may be in the Old English poem Widsith, (The Traveller's Song) from the 9th or 10th century, where
a people called the Hælsings are referred to2.
In order to standardize the Futhark signaries we may start by categorizing the letters and list them in
five columns titled linguals, palatals, gutturals, labials, dentals.

Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5

3 symbols 5 symbols 6 symbols 4 symbols 6 symbols
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Elder ᚠ ᚢ ᚦ ᚨ ᚱ ᚲ ᚷ ᚹ ᚺ ᚾ ᛁ ᛃ ᛇ ᛈ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛒ ᛖ ᛗ ᛚ ᛜ ᛞ ᛟ
Futhark f u þ a r c g w h n i j æ p z s t b e m l ŋ d o
Younger ᚠ ᚢ ᚦ ᚬ ᚱ ᚴ - - ᚼ ᚾ ᛁ - ᛅ - - ᛋ ᛏ ᛒ - ᛘ ᛚ - - ᛦ
Futhark F U Þ A R C - - H N I - Æ - - S T B - M L - - ʀ

Staveless ᚠ ᚢ ᚦ - ᚱ ᚴ - - ᚼ ᚾ ᛁ - ᛅ - - ᛋ ᛏ ᛒ - ᛘ ᛚ - - ᛦ
runes F U Þ - R C - - H N I - Æ - - S T B - M L - - ʀ
Table 8 The categorized letters of the Elder, Younger Futhark and Staveless runes signaries

2 Source: Staveless runes/Helsinger runes – Hälsingland.

The standardization of the Elder Futhark Signary
The Elder Futhark signary may be sorted as follows:

• linguals: þ, n, z, t, l, ŋ, d
• palatals: c, i, j
• gutturals: a, g, h, æ, e
• labials: f, u, w, p, b, m, o
• dentals: r, s

These letters are inserted in the five columns titled linguals, palatals, gutturals, labials, dentals:
linguals palatals gutturals labials dentals
1 Þ C A F R
2 N I G U S
3 Z J H W -
4 T Æ P
5 L E B
6 Ŋ M
7 D O

Table 9: The location of the Great Name I-G-U at the center

of the cartouche (Þ ,C, A, F, R, S, - ,W , H, J , Z , N ) in the Elder Futhark signary
The symbols I-G-U inside the cartouche may be combined with a letter Z and a trailing letter S to
form the name ZIEUS or ZIEU or ZIU. Also letters may be skipped in the words.
Each of the consonants may be replaced by a another letter of the same category. Therefore the
letter Z may be replaced by a T or a D. The symbols I-G-U inside the cartouche may be transformed
into TIEUS, TIEU or TIU, TIW, respectively DIÆUS, DIÆU , or DIEUS, DIEU or DIU, DIW.
In German dialect the personal pronoun of the 1 st person singular is “IH”, which may be related to
“IGU” (“ego”?).
The standardization of the Younger Futhark Signary
The Younger Futhark signary may be sorted as follows:
• linguals: þ, n, t, l
• palatals: c, i
• gutturals: a, h, æ
• labials: f, u, b, m
• dentals: r, s, R
The letters of the alphabet are inserted in the five columns, which in this order also represent the
representative letters of the Indo-European sky-god D-I-A-U-S:

linguals palatals gutturals labials dentals

1 Þ C A F R
2 N I H U S
3 T J Æ B
4 L M
Table 10: The location of the Great Name I-H-U at the center
of the cartouche (Þ ,C, A, F, R, S, - ,B , Æ, J , T, N) in the Younger Futhark signary
The symbols I-H-U inside the cartouche may be combined with a letter Þ and a trailing letter S to
form the sky-god's name ÞIHUS or ÞIHU or ÞIU.

Each of the consonants and vowels may be replaced by a another letter of the same category.
Therefore the letter Þ may be replaced by a T. Also letters may be skipped in the words.

According to Caesar the most important deity was named DIS or “TYS” or “TUIS”.
The trailing letter R may be replaced by the dental S which results in “TYR”

The symbols I-H-U inside the cartouche may be transformed into TIHUS, TIHU or TIU, TIW. Each
of the vowels may be replaced by a another vowel of the same category. This would transform the
sky-god's name in TIÆUS or TIÆU.
The standardization of the Staveless runes' Signary
The Younger Futhark signary may be sorted as follows:
• linguals: þ, n, t, l
• palatals: c, i
• gutturals: h, æ
• labials: f, u, b, m
• dentals: r, s, R
The letters of the alphabet are inserted in the five columns, which in this order also represent the
representative letters of the Indo-European sky-god Þ-I-Æ-U-S or T-I-Æ-U-S .

linguals palatals gutturals labials dentals

1 Þ C H F R
2 N I Æ U S
3 T J B
4 L M
Table 11: The location of the Great Name I-H-U
inside the cartouche (Þ ,C, A, F, R, S, - ,B , -, J , T, N) of the Staveless runes
In Scandinavian dialects the personal pronoun Æ for the first person singular may have been
derived from IÆU.
The encryption and decryption in the alphabets
This paper probably describes the encryption and decryption concepts in the Ugaritic alphabets and
their derivatives (including the Phoenician and Hebrew alphabet).
Why did the designer hide the keywords (such as I10-Ε5-V6, Y11, Ḫ4, W7, I-E-Y, I-E-U, I-H-U, I-G-
U, I-Æ-U) and the divine name TIEUS, TIEU or TIU, TIW, respectively DIÆUS, DIÆU, DIEUS,
DIEU or DIU, DIW?
Obviously the alphabets contained a number of keywords, which should be protected against
unveiling the most sacred Names and words. This may be illustrated by an example.
The easiest way to list the Hebrew alphabet is a simple concatenation of the 5 categories:
D4, T9, L12, N14, T22 , G3, I10, Ch11, K19, Æ1, Ε5, H8, Gh16, B2, V6, M13, Ph17, Z7, S15, Ts18, R20, S21
This concatenation however might have unveiled a fundamental periodical table with its Core Name
I10-Ε5-V6.
In order to protect the alphabet from unveiling the Name the categories in the Hebrew alphabet may
be garbled by taking the first letters of each category and list these in a well-known sequence: Æ1,
B2, G3, D4, Z7, Ε5, V6, I10, T9, S15, H8,..... but this sequence also would be too easy to decipher.
A number of extra inserts intensified the protective encryption by choosing: Æ1, B2, G3, D4, Ε5, V6,
Z7, H8, T9, I10, Ch11, L12, M13, …. This encryption level seemed to be sufficient.
The Futhark encryption may even be more complex by starting with a strange initial FU-construct,
which allowed the designers to insert the personal pronouns of the 1 st person (the duals: “wit”,
“wut”, respectively the singulars “ih” and “æ”) and the divine Names (“Vut” or “Wutan”,
respectively “Tiw” or “Teiws”) in both the decrypted, respectively encrypted signaries.
The concept of a cartouche may have been copied from the Egyptian concept of a box, which (in
the case of the signaries) is made of letters.
The sophisticated encryption and decryption methods seem to have been designed with ingenuity
and linguistic insight.
The Nomenclature of the Sky-Gods
Nomenclature is a system of names or terms, or the rules for forming these terms in a particular
field of arts or sciences. Usually the dictionaries and encyclopedias do not explain the roots for the
names of the sky-gods.
In the etymology the nomenclature of the Sky-Gods such as Dyaus, Deus, Dios may be described as
a PIE-“root”-word, but the roots remained undefined. To my surprise the nomenclature of the Sky-
Gods seemed to be correlated to personal pronouns for the first person singular, respectively dual.
This correlation remains “unexplained”.
Both the nomenclature of the sky-gods and the personal pronouns for the first person singular seem
to be based on the five sources (lips, palatal, throath, lips and teeth) of the human voice, which are
represented by 5 letter categories (“linguals, palatals, gutturals, labials, dentals”).
In the course of time these letters were also used to compose the names of the sky-gods and the
personal pronouns for the first person singular, respectively dual.
Although the standard 5 letters D, Y, E, U, S or D, I, A, U, S are preferences for the names of the
sky-god also other alternatives exist, which may have been caused by abrasion. A standard abrasion
is the loss of the first letter “D”, “T” or “Θ”, “Z”, which results in names such as Ju-piter, Ju-no,
etc. instead of DJu-piter, Dju-no, ….
Usually the personal pronouns IAU, IEU, IOU for the first person singular singular (“I”) are
composed from subsets of the 5 letter categories DIAUS. The shorter personal pronouns for the
first person singular singular (“I”) are deteriorated by abrasion.
The theonym DYAUS seemed to represent “all categories” of the alphabet, in which “all letters”
symbolized the overall expansion of the universe. The theonym DYAUS represents the universe,
which is symbolized by the complete alphabet. The personal pronouns IAU, IEU, IOU for the first
person singular singular (“I”) may indicate that these words are images of the sky-god Creator
DIAUS.
The personal pronoun “I” (or middle-English “Y”) represents a subset of the theonym DYAUS.
Mircea Eliade (1958: 38–111) proposes that a characteristic feature of archaic strata of the
world’s mythologies is to name the sky-god “Sky, Heaven, Weather” or with a word that
otherwise indicates the upper, celestial sphere. The degree to which this proposition is generally
valid warrants critical reassessment, but it is well established for Indo-European and Uralic
languages. In the case of Indo-European, the Proto-Indo-European theonym can, relatively
speaking, be straightforwardly reconstructed as *Dyéus “Sky”, a name identical to the common
noun *dyéus “sky” (West 2007: 167, 170–171)3.

The diacritic on the letter é in *dyéus is also found in the Provencal words DIÉU and the personal
pronoun IÉU for the first person singular singular (“I”).
The straightforwardly reconstruction as *DYÉUS “Sky” from the common noun *dyéus “sky” is a
simplified step, which does not explain the symbolism inside the noun *dyéus for “sky”.
Proto-Indo-European *DΕIWÓS “heavenly one, god” is similarly an adjectival derivative of
*DYÉUS “sky”. Speakers of the Uralic proto-languages receiving the loan are unlikely to have had
a pantheon in the Indo-European sense, but they may have known the 5 sources for the human
voice.
The accuracy of the methods to describe the etymology depends on the precision in categorizing the
letters of the alphabet.

3 Language and Mythology: Semantic Correlation and Disambiguation of Gods as Iconic Signs. (from: Shamanhood
and Mythology - Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy and Current - Techniques of Research)
The Categorization
On a European scale the standardization of the categorization is largely unknown. This already
starts with the definition of the 5 letter categories (“linguals, palatals, gutturals, labials, dentals”),
which may vary from language to language. No analysis enables us to define all contributions of the
phonetic sources over the vast period of time languages exist. The only written definition I found
was located in a rabbi's comments to the “Sefer Yetzirah”4.

Signary Central Triad of Remarks Categories

(“alphabet”) Letters
(inside a cartouche)
Hebrew I10-Ε5-V6 The Great Name linguals: D4, T9, L12, N14, T22
alphabet I-H-V palatals: G3, I10, Ch11, K19
gutturals: Æ1, Ε5, H8, Gh16
labials: B2, V6, M13, Ph17
dentals: Z7, S15, Ts18, R20, S21
Ugaritic Y11, Ḫ4, W7 Cuneiform Linguals: D5, Ṭ10, L14, Ḏ16, N17, T27
alphabet (transliterated) palatals: G3, Y11, K12, Q13, Ġ26
gutturals: ʾA1, Ḫ4, H6, Ḥ9, ʿ(O)20, ʾI28
labials: B2, W7, M15, P21, 'U29
dentals: Z8, Š13, Ẓ18, S19, Ṣ22, R24, Ṯ25, S230
Early Greek I-E-F, respectively F = digamma linguals: Δ, Θ, Λ, N, T
alphabet I-E-Y (→ U,V,W,Y) palatals: Γ, I, K, Q
gutturals: A, E, H, O
labials: B, F, M, Π, Φ, Y, Ω
dentals: Ζ, Ξ, “M”, P, Σ
Latin I-E-V, respectively F = digamma linguals: D, L, N, T
alphabet I-E-U (→ U,V,W) palatals: C, I, J, K, Q, X, Y
gutturals: A, E, H, O
labials: B, F, M, P, U, V, W, Y
dentals: G, R, S, Z
Younger I-H-U U = the U from linguals: þ, n, t, l
Futhark Futhark palatals: c, i
gutturals: a, h, æ
Signary labials: f, u, b, m
dentals: r, s, R
Elder I-G-U U = the U from linguals: þ, n, z, t, l, ŋ, d
Futhark Futhark palatals: c, i, j
gutturals: a, g, h, æ, e
Signary labials: f, u, w, p, b, m, o
dentals: r, s
Staveless I-Æ-U U = the U from linguals: þ, n, t, l
runes Futhark palatals: c, i
gutturals: h, æ
Signary labials: f, u, b, m
dentals: r, s, R

Table 12 Central Triads of Letters inside the cartouche of the standardized alphabets

4 Based on Rabbi Saadia Gaon's Judeo-Arabic commentary on “Sefer Yetzirah” (chapter 4, paragraph 3), wherein he
describes the phonetic sounds of the 22 characters of the Hebrew alphabet (Another View on the Sefer Yetzirah).
A list of names for the sky-gods
In this chapter the following list of names for the sky-gods is largely extracted from an article
“Semantic Correlation and Disambiguation of Gods as Iconic Signs”. 5
I will use the following standard of the Hebrew alphabet6 to derive some names for the sky-gods:
• linguals: D4, T9, L12, N14, T22
• palatals: G3, I10, Ch11, K19
• gutturals: Æ1, Ε5, H8, Gh16
• labials: B2, V6, M13, Ph17
• dentals: Z7, S15, Ts18, R20, S21
In this paper the words will be illuminated with their categorical colors. Only the names with 5
colors (such as: *DΕIWÓS, *DYÉUS, *DAIVAS, INMAR, ILMAR[I],*TĪWAZ, WŌDINAZ,
*TIERMĒS) will be considered as genuine sky-gods.

*JUMA
*JUMA is widely accepted as a loan from a Proto-Indo-Iranian form a word for “celestial, bright,
light”, reconstructed *DYUMĀN- (Koivulehto 1999: 228) or *DYUMĀ(N)T- (Parpola 2012: 161).
*JUMA is equipped with the same categories (palatal - guttural - labial) as the Great Name YHW.

*TΕŊRI
Proto-Turkic *TΕŊRI “God; sky, heaven” .

*DΕIWÓS
Proto-Indo-European *DΕIWÓS “heavenly one, god” is similarly an adjectival derivative of
*DYÉUS “sky”. Speakers of the Uralic proto-languages receiving the loan are unlikely to have had
a pantheon in the Indo-European sense.

*DAIVAS
Proto-Indo-Iranian maintained a word *DAIVAS, derivative of Proto-Indo-European *DΕIWÓS
“god”. If *juma was borrowed as a common noun for “god”, it is reasonable to question why
*dyumān-/*dyuma(n)t- was borrowed for this category rather than *daivas.

JUMA and JUMO

Evidence of *juma is unambiguous in Mari, where JUMO “god, heaven, supreme god” is prominent
as both name and theonym. *JUMO is equipped with the same categories as the Great Name YHW.
Komi languages exhibit a word JUMA for “witch” that has been considered potentially a loan from
Vepsian (Rédei et al. 1986–1988: 638), presumably because word-final /l/ underwent vocalization in
some Vepsian dialects (Central Vepsian gumau, gumou, South Vepsian jumā),12 in which case the
loan would be fairly recent.
In the present context, most significant is that the loanword *juma underwent semantic correlation
in Mari and the Proto-Finnic development of jumala may potentially have in its background a

5 Language and Mythology: Semantic Correlation and Disambiguation of Gods as Iconic Signs. (from Mr Frog :
published in Shamanhood and Mythology - Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy and Current - Techniques of Research)
6 Based on Rabbi Saadia Gaon's Judeo-Arabic commentary on “Sefer Yetzirah” (chapter 4, paragraph 3)
disambiguation of the category of agents (“god”) from the natural phenomenon (“sky”).
*JUMA is equipped with the same categories as the Great Name YHW.

INMAR
Udmurt presents a complex case. INMAR is the most common and widespread designation for the
celestial god. However, Yrjö Wichmann (1893: 5–6) observes that Udmurt exhibits three terms used
in local language forms for both the celestial god and the phenomenon of the sky or heaven: in,
inmar and KWAŹ.
Udmurt INMAR was compared to Finnic ILMAR(I) beginning from the earliest phase of research
(Wiedemann 1851: 9; Castrén 1853: 306).

*TĪWAZ
Derivatives of a Proto-Germanic theonym *TĪWAZ “God”, also from *deiwós, are found, although
evidence for the theonym in many languages is sparse and in several cases comes via etymologies
of the name for the day of the week (i.e. Tuesday and its cognates). *Tīwaz is widely considered to
have filled the role of Proto-Indo-European *Dyéus (e.g. Simek 1996: 337), although this can be
questioned on the basis of the Old Norse evidence, where the theonym TÝR “God” is a marginal
figure in the mythology.
Although the evidence is slim, it seems probable that *Tīwaz, Early Proto-Germanic / Pre-Germanic
*TEIWAZ, or perhaps some even earlier derivative of Proto-Indo-European *deiwós “god”,
replaced the theonym *Dyéus in Germanic languages.

*GUDA
In Germanic languages, the Christian God was designated with derivatives of Proto-Germanic
*GUDA “god” (etymology uncertain). Derivatives of the common noun *tīwaz “god” seem to have
been poetic or archaic words in Germanic languages where they are attested at all, making it
probable that *guda “god” was already becoming the more common term in Proto-Germanic.

*WŌDINAZ
Proto-Germanic *WŌDINAZ/*WŌDANAZ > Old Norse Óðinn “Odin”, a god associated with
rage, ecstatic states, poetry, mythic knowledge and death, became a central god in a role
corresponding to that of Proto-Indo-European *Dyéus “Sky”.

TAIVAS
Proto-Finnic *TAIVAS has generally been considered a loan from a derivative of Indo-European
*deiwós “god”. Semantically, the etymology of *taivas requires a transition from the semantic field
of “god” to “heaven” without carrying an additional meaning of “god” (e.g. LägLös III: 268). M. L.
West (2007: 167) views the Finnic loan simply as evidence that, in the Proto-Indo-Iranian source
language, *daivas had become used as a synonym of *dyéus and of the corresponding name *Dyéus
(see also vocabulary in Joki 1973: 323).
IBMEL
In North Sámi IBMEL (“god”) the divine Name of the Saami languages may be correlating with
“JUMALA” (in Southern Saami: JUPMELE):

Personal
Language Orthographic form
Pronoun “I”
Inari Saami IMMEEL Mun, munnâ
Kildin Saami ИММЕЛЬ мунн
Lule Saami JUBMEL Mån , månnå
Northern Saami IPMIL mʊn
Skolt Saami E´MMEL mon
Southern Saami JUPMELE manne
Table 13: Concept GOD in Saami-languages in the NorthEuraLex 0.9 Database

ILMAN UKKO
ILMAN UKKO “old man of the sky” (Finnic)

TIERMĒS
Observing that *TIERMĒS was the central sky-god in Northeast Proto-Sámi, the theonym suggests
that populations undergoing a language shift in this region retained at least some of the socially
central elements of their indigenous religion.
Summary
Obviously the Elder & Younger Futhark as well as the staveless runes could not be interpreted as
standard abecedaria. The runic signaries also could not be transformed to periodical tables.
Although the runic (Futhark, Futhorc and the Staveless) alphabets seemed to share the same
categorization of the abecedaria their literal order “F-U-Th-A-R-K” could not be understood.
In the course of time the core “Futhark” of the first 6 letters (Futhark, Futhorc, Futhrk) remained
remarkable stable and never really changed its pattern, which came close to the same categorization
linguals, palatals, gutturals, labials, dentals) according to the Indo-European sky-god D-I-A-U-S.
A problem arose from the first two letters, which usually are identified as labials. The initial couple
of letters “F”-”U” at the Futhark-signaries could not be explained in the structure of Flinders
Petrie's periodical tables.
The standardization of the runic alphabets however turned out to be successful. All investigated
alphabets (Ugaritic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Futhark, Futhorc, Futhrk) turned out to display a sacred
core of 3 vowels at the center of cartouche in the standardized alphabetic array of letters.
The method to standardize the Ugaritic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin and Futhark alphabets is simple. We
may categorize each letter and fill a table with the letters for each category according to their
standard order in the alphabet. The letters of the alphabet are inserted in the five columns, which in
this order also represent the representative letters of the Indo-European sky-god D-I-A-U-S.
Both the Younger and Elder Futhark as well as the staveless runes could be standardized, resulting
in the deities TIEUS, TIEU or TIU, TIW, respectively DIÆUS, DIÆU , or DIEUS, DIEU or DIU,
DIW.
The central triads of letters inside the cartouche of the standardized alphabets are identified as a
common pattern: palatal – guttural - labial (such as I10-Ε5-V6, Y11, Ḫ4, W7, I-E-Y, I-E-U, I-H-U, I-
G-U, I-Æ-U).
Apart from the Hebrew alphabet most of these letter combinations inside the cartouche may have
been used to form the personal pronouns (“ego”) of the first person singular. Several languages such
as Provencal and some Romansh dialects also use IEU (respectively IAU and IOU) as personal
pronouns (“ego”) of the first person singular. These patterns may be generated by standardizing the
signaries.
Most European languages derived their signaries from the investigated alphabets in this paper and
adopted the central triads of letters inside the cartouche. Several languages may have encoded the
personal pronouns (“ego”) of the first person singular in special symbols such as the Russian “JA”-
symbol.
The Futhark signaries are following the standardization rules which are also found in the Hebrew,
Greek and Latin alphabets. The Germanic linguists must have been aware of the standardization
procedure to form the cores I-H-U, I-G-U, and I-Æ-U .
The 5 columns with the categorized letters resembles Flinders Petrie's periodical table, but the rules
to fill the standardized alphabets are different. The letters “F”-”U” will not be found next to each
others. Instead the “F” is found in the first row and the ”U” in the second row. This is why the
vowels are located at the second row of the array:
• linguals: Þ, N, T, L
• palatals: C, I
• gutturals: H, Æ
• labials: F, U, B, M
• dentals: R, S, R
Both the nomenclature of the sky-gods and the personal pronouns for the first person singular seem
to be based on the five sources (lips, palatal, throath, lips and teeth) of the human voice, which are
represented by 5 letter categories (“linguals, palatals, gutturals, labials, dentals”).
Although the standard 5 letters D, Y, E, U, S or D, I, A, U, S are preferences for the names of the
sky-god also other alternatives exist, which may have been caused by abrasion. A standard abrasion
is the loss of the first letter “D”, “T” or “Θ”, “Z”, which results in names such as Ju-piter, Ju-no,
etc. instead of DJu-piter, Dju-no, ….
The theonym DYAUS represents the universe, which is symbolized by the complete alphabet. The
personal pronouns IAU, IEU, IOU for the first person singular singular (“I”) may indicate that these
words are images of the sky-god Creator DIAUS.
In this paper the words will be illuminated with their categorical colors. Only the names with 5
colors (such as: *DΕIWÓS, *DYÉUS, *DAIVAS, INMAR, ILMAR[I],*TĪWAZ, WŌDINAZ,
*TIERMĒS) will be identified and interpreted as genuine sky-gods.
Contents
Abstract.................................................................................................................................................1
Introduction..........................................................................................................................................2
Standardizing of the Signaries..............................................................................................................3
The Standardizing of the Hebrew alphabet......................................................................................3
The Standardizing of the Ugaritic alphabet.....................................................................................4
The Standardizing of the Greek alphabet........................................................................................5
The Standardizing of the Latin alphabet .........................................................................................6
The Germanic signaries...................................................................................................................7
Notes to the staveless runes - “Futhrk”.......................................................................................8
The standardization of the Elder Futhark Signary......................................................................9
The standardization of the Younger Futhark Signary...............................................................10
The standardization of the Staveless runes' Signary.................................................................11
The encryption and decryption in the alphabets.................................................................................12
The Nomenclature of the Sky-Gods...................................................................................................13
The Categorization.........................................................................................................................14
A list of names for the sky-gods....................................................................................................15
*JUMA .....................................................................................................................................15
*TΕŊRI.....................................................................................................................................15
*DΕIWÓS.................................................................................................................................15
*DAIVAS..................................................................................................................................15
JUMA and JUMO.....................................................................................................................15
INMAR.....................................................................................................................................16
*TĪWAZ....................................................................................................................................16
*GUDA.....................................................................................................................................16
*WŌDINAZ..............................................................................................................................16
TAIVAS.....................................................................................................................................16
IBMEL......................................................................................................................................17
ILMAN UKKO.........................................................................................................................17
TIERMĒS..................................................................................................................................17
Summary.............................................................................................................................................18
Appendix – Papers of J. Richter at Academia.edu and Scribd...........................................................21
Appendix – Papers of J. Richter at Academia.edu and Scribd
Periodic Tables are documented in:
1. Notes on the Common Architecture of European Alphabets (Ugaritic, Old Persian signary,
the Greek alphabet, Sanskrit)
2. A Periodic Table for PIE-Alphabets (languages: Ugaritic, Latin, Elder and Younger Futhark,
Gothic, etc.)
3. A Periodic Table for the Cyrillic Alphabet (Glagolitic, early Cyrillic and Russian alphabets)
4. A Periodic Table for the Coptic Alphabet
5. A Periodic Table for the Old-English Alphabet including “The insertion of Chilperic's letters
in the Old English alphabet”.
6. A Periodic Table for the Icelandic Alphabet (Scribd)
7. A Periodic Table for the Phoenician and Hebrew Alpabet (Scribd)
8. De hiërarchische structuur van het Hebreeuwse alfabet (Scribd)
9. The Hierarchical Structure of the Hebrew Alphabet (Scribd)
10. Periodic Tables for the Dalecarlian Runes and the Elfdalian Alphabet (Scribd)
11. A Periodic Table for the Dutch Language
12. Periodic Tables for the Sami Alphabets
13. Het hart van de Nederlandse taal
14. Eight Periodic Tables for the Sámi Languages
15. Overview of the Periodic Tables of the Sami Languages
16. Periodic Tables for the Upper and Lower Sorbian Alphabets
17. A Periodic Table for the Greek Alphabet
18. Periodic Tables for the Euboean and Etruscan Alphabets (Scribd)
19. Did the Word „Deus“ Exist in the Archaic Alphabets (Scribd)
20. Periodic Tables for the Gaelic (Irish and Scottish alphabets (Scribd)
21. A Periodic Table for Ugaritic Signaries as a Root for the Sky-god Dyaus and the Personal
Pronouns for the 1st Person Singular and Dual Form
22. De architectuur van het Oegaritische alfabet (Scribd)
23. The Quantization of the Ugaritic Alphabet (Scribd)
24. Alphabets With Integrated Dictionaries (Scribd)
25. Another View on the Sefer Yetzirah (Scribd)
26. Standardizing the Signaries - The Encryption and Decryption of alphabets... (Scribd)
The (approximately) 150 following papers are sorted according to the initial upload date7 :
• Standardizing the Signaries - The Encryption and Decryption of alphabets (Scribd)
• Another View on the Sefer Yetzirah (Scribd)
• Alphabets With Integrated Dictionaries (Scribd)
• The Quantization of the Ugaritic Alphabet (Scribd)
• De architectuur van het Oegaritische alfabet (Scribd)
• A Periodic Table for Ugaritic Signaries as a Root for the Sky-god Dyaus and the Personal
Pronouns for the 1st Person Singular and Dual Form
• Periodic Tables for the Gaelic (Irish and Scottish alphabets (Scribd)
• Did the Word „Deus“ Exist in the Archaic Alphabets (Scribd)
• Periodic Tables for the Euboean and Etruscan Alphabets (Scribd)
• A Periodic Table for the Greek Alphabet
• Periodic Tables for the Upper and Lower Sorbian Alphabets
• Overview of the Periodic Tables of the Sami Languages
• Eight Periodic Tables for the Sámi Languages

7 https://independent.academia.edu/JoannesRichter, respectively https://independent.academia.edu/richterJoannes

• Het hart van de Nederlandse taal
• Periodic Tables for the Sami Alphabets
• A Periodic Table for the Dutch Language
• Periodic Tables for the Dalecarlian Runes and the Elfdalian Alphabet (Scribd)
• The Hierarchical Structure of the Hebrew Alphabet (Scribd)
• De hiërarchische structuur van het Hebreeuwse alfabet (Scribd)
• A Periodic Table for the Phoenician and Hebrew Alpabet (Scribd)
• A Periodic Table for the Icelandic Alphabet (Scribd)
• A Periodic Table for the Coptic Alphabet (Scribd)
• A Periodic Table for the Cyrillic Alphabet (Scribd)
• The Impact of Ternary Coding Systems (Scribd)
• A Pedigree for Alphabets (Scribd)
• The Composition of the European Alphabets (Scribd)
• The Letter Repositioning in the Greek and Latin Alphabets
• Unstably Classified Letters in Alphabets (Scribd)
• Notes on the Common Architecture of Alphabetical Structures (Academia.edu)
• A Periodic Table for PIE-Alphabets
• A Periodic Classification for the Gothic Alphabet (obsolete, Scribd)
• A Periodic Classification for the Futhark-Alphabets (obsolete, Scribd)
• A Periodic Classification for the Latin Alphabet (obsolete, Scribd)
• The Model of a Language as a Communication Link (Scribd)
• The Roots of the Indo-European Alphabets (12.5.2020)
• Samenvatting van "The Alphabet as an Elementary Document"
• The Alphabet as an Elementary Document
• The Origin of the Name Dyaus
• De oorsprong van de naam Diaus
• The History of Designing an Alphabet (Scribd)
• Een architectuur voor de PIE-talen (Scribd)
• An Architecture for the PIE-Languages
• A Suggested Restoration of the 'Futhark'-Sequence (Scribd)
• The Composition of the Sky- God's Name in PIE-Languages
• The Ternary Codes in Language and Creation (Scribd)
• The Role of Saussure's Letter "E"
• The Optimal Number of Vowels in Languages (Scribd)
• A Ternary Encoding to Optimize Communications and Cooperation
◦ A Golden Box to Control the Lightnings
◦ The Ancient Lightning Rods around the Mediterranean Sea
◦ Die ältesten Blitz(ab)leiter am Mittelmeer (Scribd)
◦ Pyramids in the Role as Power Plants
◦ Piramides als energiecentrales (Scribd)
◦ The Role of the Pyramids in Melting Glass and Meta... (Scribd)
◦ The Egyptian Drilling Technology (Scribd)
• The Architecture of the Younger Futhark Alphabet
• The Sources for the IΩ- Pronouns
• Notes to Herodotus' Histories of IΩ, Europa and Medea
◦ The Role of Irrigation and Drainage in a Successful Civilisation
◦ De rol van de irrigatie en drainage in een succesv... (Scribd)
◦ Notes to Frazer's "Pausanias's Description of Greece"
 ◦ The Initials of European Philosophy
◦ Atlantis vormde 3400 jaar geleden een Helleens Delta-project
◦ The War against Atlantis
• The "Ego"-Root inside the Name "Thebes"
• The Role of the AEtts in the Futharc Alpabet
• The Reconstruction of a European Philosophy
• Traces of an old religion (The Root "Wit" in Wittekind)
• Woden (Wuþ) as the Designer and Author of the Futhark Alphabet
• Is the Core "Wut" in "Wutach" symbolizing "Wutan" ("Woden")
• The Bipolar Core of Germanic Languages
• Simon Stevin's Redefinition of Scientific Arts
• Simon Stevin's definitie van wetenschappelijk onderz
• De etymologie van de woorden met Wit-, Wita en Witan-kernen
• The "Vit"-Roots in the Anglo-Saxon Pedigree
• The Traces of "Wit" in Saxony
• King Chilperic I's letters (ΔΘZΨ) may be found at the beginning ("Futha") of the runic
alphabet and at the end (WIJZAE) of the Danish alphabet
• Aan het slot (WIJZAE) van het Deense alfabet en aan het begin ("Futha") van het
runenalfabet bevinden zich de letters (ΔΘZΨ) van koning Chilperik I
• The Role of the Ligature AE in the European Creation Legend
• A Concept for a Runic Dictionary
• Concentrating the Runes in the Runic Alphabets
• Traces of Vit, Rod and Chrodo
• De sleutelwoorden van het Futhark alfabet
• The Keywords of the Futhark Alphabet
• Het runenboek met het unieke woord Tiw
• A short Essay about the Evolution of European Personal Pronouns
• The Evolution of the European Personal Pronouns
• De miraculeuze transformatie van de Europese samenleving
• The Miraculous Transformation of European Civilization
• The Duality in Greek and Germanic Philosophy
• Bericht van de altaarschellist over de Lof der Zotheid
• De bronnen van Brabant (de Helleputten aan de Brabantse breuklijnen)
• De fundamenten van de samenleving
• De rol van de waterbronnen bij de kerstening van Nederland
• De etymologie van "wijst" en "wijstgrond"
• The Antipodes Mith and With
• The Role of the Dual Form in the Evolution of European Languages
• De rol van de dualis in de ontwikkeling der Europese talen
• The Search for Traces of a Dual Form in Quebec French
• Synthese van de Germanistische & Griekse mythologie en etymologie
• De restanten van de dualis in het Nederlands, Engels en Duits
• Notes to the Corner Wedge in the Ugaritic Alphabet
• The Origin of the long IJ-symbol in the Dutch alphabet
• Over de oorsprong van de „lange IJ“ in het Nederlandse alfabet
• The Backbones of the Alphabets
• The Alphabet and and the Symbolic Structure of Europe
• The Unseen Words in the Runic Alphabet
• De ongelezen woorden in het runenalfabet
• The Role of the Vowels in Personal Pronouns of the 1st Person Singular
• Over de volgorde van de klinkers in woorden en in godennamen
• The Creation Legends of Hesiod and Ovid
• De taal van Adam en Eva (published: ca. 2.2.2019)
• King Chilperic's 4 Letters and the Alphabet's Adaptation
• De 4 letters van koning Chilperik I en de aanpassing van het Frankenalfabet
• The Symbolism of Hair Braids and Bonnets in Magical Powers
• The Antipodes in PIE-Languages
• In het Nederlands, Duits en Engels is de dualis nog lang niet uitgestorven
• In English, Dutch and German the dual form is still alive
• The Descendants of the Dual Form " Wit "
• A Structured Etymology for Germanic, Slavic and Romance Languages
• The “Rod”-Core in Slavic Etymology (published: ca. 27.11.2018)
• Encoding and decoding the runic alphabet
• Über die Evolution der Sprachen
• Over het ontwerpen van talen
• The Art of Designing Languages
• Notes to the usage of the Spanish words Nos and Vos, Nosotros and Vosotros
• Notes to the Dual Form and the Nous-Concept in the Inari Sami language
• Over het filosofische Nous-concept
• Notes to the Philosophical Nous-Concept
• The Common Root for European Religions (published: ca. 27.10.2018)
• A Scenario for the Medieval Christianization of a Pagan Culture
• Een scenario voor de middeleeuwse kerstening van een heidens volk
• The Role of the Slavic gods Rod and Vid in the Futhorc-alphabet
• The Unification of Medieval Europe
• The Divergence of Germanic Religions
• De correlatie tussen de dualis, Vut, Svantevit en de Sint-Vituskerken
• The Correlation between Dual Forms, Vut, Svantevit and the Saint Vitus Churches
• Die Rekonstruktion der Lage des Drususkanals (published: ca. 27.9.2018)
• Die Entzifferung der Symbolik einer Runenreihe
• Deciphering the Symbolism in Runic Alphabets
• The Sky-God, Adam and the Personal Pronouns
• Notities rond het boek Tiw (Published ca. 6.2.2018)
• Notes to the book TIW
• Von den Völkern, die nach dem Futhark benannt worden sind
• Designing an Alphabet for the Runes
• Die Wörter innerhalb der „Futhark“-Reihe
• The hidden Symbolism of European Alphabets
• Etymology, Religions and Myths
• The Symbolism of the Yampoos and Wampoos in Poe's “Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym
from Nantucket”
• Notizen zu " Über den Dualis " und " Gesammelte sprachwissenschaftliche Schriften "
• Ϝut - Het Nederlandse sleutelwoord
• Concepts for the Dual Forms
• The etymology of the Greek dual form νώ (νῶϊ)
• Proceedings in the Ego-pronouns' Etymology
• Notities bij „De godsdiensten der volken“
• The Role of *Teiwaz and *Dyeus in Filosofy
• A Linguistic Control of Egotism
• The Design of the Futhark Alphabet
• An Architecture for the Runic Alphabets
• The Celtic Hair Bonnets (Published Jun 24, 2018)
• Die keltische Haarhauben
• De sculpturen van de Walterich-kapel te Murrhardt
• The rediscovery of a lost symbolism
• Het herontdekken van een vergeten symbolisme
• De god met de twee gezichten
• The 3-faced sculpture at Michael's Church in Forchtenberg
• Over de woorden en namen, die eeuwenlang bewaard gebleven zijn
• De zeven Planeten in zeven Brabantse plaatsnamen
• Analysis of the Futhorc-Header
• The Gods in the Days of the Week and inside the Futhor-alphabet
• Een reconstructie van de Nederlandse scheppingslegende
• The Symbolism in Roman Numerals
• The Keywords in the Alphabets Notes to the Futharc's Symbolism
• The Mechanisms for Depositing Loess in the Netherlands
• Over het ontstaan van de Halserug, de Heelwegen en Heilwegen in de windschaduw van de
Veluwe
• Investigations of the Rue d'Enfer-Markers in France
• Die Entwicklung des französischen Hellwegs ( " Rue d'Enfer "
• De oorsprong van de Heelwegen op de Halserug, bij Dinxperlo en Beltrum
• The Reconstruction of the Gothic Alphabet's Design
• Von der Entstehungsphase eines Hellwegs in Dinxperlo-Bocholt
• Over de etymologie van de Hel-namen (Heelweg, Hellweg, Helle..) in Nederland
• Recapitulatie van de projecten Ego-Pronomina, Futhark en Hellweg
• Over het ontstaan en de ondergang van het Futhark-alfabet
• Die Etymologie der Wörter Hellweg, Heelweg, Rue d'Enfer, Rue de l'Enfer und Santerre
• The Etymology of the Words Hellweg, Rue d'Enfer and Santerre
• The Decoding of the Kylver Stone' Runes
• The Digamma-Joker of the Futhark
• The Kernel of the Futhorc Languages
• De kern van de Futhark-talen
• Der Kern der Futhark-Sprachen
• De symboolkern IE van het Nederlands
• Notes to Guy Deutscher's "Through the Language Glass"
• Another Sight on the Unfolding of Language (Published 1 maart, 2018)
• Notes to the Finnish linguistic symbolism of the sky-god's name and the days of the week
• A modified Swadesh List (Published 12 / 17 / 2017)
• A Paradise Made of Words
• The Sky-God Names and the Correlating Personal Pronouns
• The Nuclear Pillars of Symbolism (Published 10 / 28 / 2017)
• The Role of the Dual Form in Symbolism and Linguistics (Oct 17, 2017)
• The Correlation between the Central European Loess Belt, the Hellweg-Markers and the
Main Isoglosses
• The Central Symbolic Core of Provencal Language (Oct 7, 2017)
• The Hermetic Codex II - Bipolar Monotheism (Scribd)