But in reality, these two models of explanation are not all as different as their
supporters like to think. We can illustrate this by using the example of the
wave-particle dualism of light, which has puzzled physics for quite some
time. Light sometimes behaves like a wave and sometimes like a particle
regardless of the conditions of the experiment! It would therefore be wrong
to unilaterally refer to light waves while simply ignoring the physical reality
of the light particles, and reverse. In the end, the physicists themselves
decide which way the light should behave in their experiment or in their
concept of the world.
The same holds true for the practitioner. The concept that our reality is
always the reality of the description should be confronted at an early stage;
our reality merely reflects that which we are able to express and perceive in
one way or another.
You'll be running into this important principle of modern magic again
and again throughout the course of this book.
In practice, we need to choose the approach that's most likely to work,
and whatever that might be depends on a number of various factors, such
as one's own spiritual composition and ideological preferences, but also on
practical aspects as well. As antirationalistic as it may seem, experience has
shown that it's wise to not worry about the apparent contradiction between
animistic and spiritualistic models of explanation; the easiest way to do this
is by simply ((ignoring, the temptation to ponder their degree of truth.
Paradigm Shifting