CHECKLISTS: SAMPLE ISSUES FOR AUDIT

SITE OBSERVATION
1. FORMWORKS ARE DILAPIDATED (OVER USED)
2. USING G.I WIRES TO TIE FORMWORKS SUPPORTS
3. EHS- OXY ACETYLENE HAS NO CYLINDER CAPS PROVIDED, PROPER STORAGE AND HANDLING MUST BE OBSERVED
4. QEHS - SOME EVALUATION PLANS ARE NOT SIGNATORY LOCATED @ SITE. ALSO, SOME STAFF ARE NOT AWARE OF
THE EVACUATION ASSEMBLY AREA
5. QEHS - NO PROPER SEGRAGATION OF WSTE WAS IMPLEMENTED AT SITE.
6. QEHS - NO MEASURES OF CATEFORIZED RECYCLABLE, NON-RECYCLABLE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE.
7. HS – 433 NO RECORD OF INCIDENT/ACCIDENT REPORT HAPPENED LAST YEAR AS PER SAFETY SUPERINTENDENT
8. OBJECTIVES, TARGETS, PROGRAMS ARE ESTABLISHED BUT SOME DATES ARE NOT UPDATED
9. PRESENCE OF CONCRETE LAITTANCE
10. FIRE PROTECTION PIPES PASSING THROUGH BEAMS WERE PATCHED BY MORTAR. MUST BE FIRE STOP TECHNOLOGY
11. DOCUMENT CONTROL ROOM IS TOO SMALL TO ACCOMMODATE FILES
12. IFC (ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION) DRAWINGS SHOULD BE CENTRALIZED FOR EVERYONE’S USE
13. TESTING REPORTS ARE NOT FILED AT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL ROOM. ALL REPORTS MUST BE SECURED.
14. AS-BUILT/RED LINING IMPLEMENTATION MUST BE IMPROVED
15. SAFETY SIGNAGES WERE POSTED ON PROJECT SITES
16. INCOMPLETE FORMWORK ACCESSORIES OBSERVED DURING THE AUDIT

IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION

1. INCOMPLETE SIGNATORY ON MATERIAL DELIVERY INSP. REPORT for RSB

2. TEST RESULT OF RSB NOT TRACEABLE TO MILL CERTIFICATES
3. INCOMPLE DATA ON CONCRETE POURING REQUEST
4. INCOMPLETE DATA ON COMPRESSIVE TEST RESULT MONITORING (28 DAYS COMPRESSIVE TEST RESULT ARE MISSING
AND NOT REFLECTED ON POURING DATES
5. PROGRESS INSPECTION REPORTS ARE NOT CLOSED
6. WORK PERMITS ARE AVAILABLE BUT COMPLETENESS OF ENTRY SHOULD BE ACCOMPLISHED
7. NO APPROVED PEP
8. OPERATIONS SHOULD AT ALL TIMES AWARE OF ALL PROJECT CONTROLS FROM ISSUANCE OF PLAN TO ACTIITY
IMPLEMENTATION
9. NO WASH BAY IS EVIDENT AT SITE BOTH AREA
10. NO FCDS ARE ISSUED AT SITE UPTO THIS DATE
11. NO RECORDS OF MILL CERTIFICATES OF REBAR FROM … TO…. AS PER INTERVIEW WITH PROJECT SUPERINDENDENT,
TURNOVER OF DOCUMENTS/RECORDS WAS NOT PROPERLY DONE RESULTING TO MISSING OR MISPLACED RECORDS
12. SEVERAL CONCRETE POURING REQUEST/ACTIVITIES PROCEEDED WITH OUT APPROVAL FROM THIRD PARTY
INSPECTOR TEAM
13. FREQUENCY OF PROGRESS INSPECTION REPORT ISSUANCE WAS NOT FOLLOWED. AS PER APPROVED PROJ. QUALITY
PLAN, IT SHOULD BE GENERATED ON A DAILY BASIS.
14. REQUIREMENT FOR SAMPLING AND TESTING OF STEEL REINFORCEMENT WAS NOT FOLLOWED. SAMPLING AND
TESTING WAS CONDUCTED ON A QUARTERLY BASIS ONLY. AS PER STRUCTURAL SPECS. IT SHOULD BE PER DELIVERY
PER DIAMETER.
15. INCOMPLETE SIGNATORY ON WORK REQUEST
16. CONCRETE DESIGN STRENGTH WAS NOT INDICATED ON THE POURING REQUEST

ASSET MANAGEMENT, CONTROL, ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION

1. OIL CONTAINER SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH DRIP PAN TO AVOID SLIPPAGE
2. ADDITIONAL PROTECTION SHOULD BE PROVIDED ESPECIALLY FOR CEMENT BAGS
3. PROPER STOCKING SHOULD ALWAYS BE OBSERVED TO EXPEDITE QUICK INVENTORY AND MONITOR (FIRST COME
FIRST OUT) OF MATERIALS
4. MATERIALS SAFETY DATA SHEET SHOULD ALWAYS VISIBLE AT ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
5. COMPLETENESS OF ENTRY ON ALL FORMS (E.G. SIGNATORIES, CONTROL AND RECEIVING GUARD)
6. PROVIDE MONITORING OF INCOMING MATERIALS FROM OTHER SITE
7. PROVIDE LOG FOR ISSUANCE OF CONTROLLED GATE PASS BOTH INCOMING AND OUTGOING TO IMMEDIATELY TRACE
PERSON/SUBCON ON THEIR MAT IN AND OUT OF MATERIALS
8. RECORDS TRACEABILITY OF STOCK (TRANSFER SLIP) IS INCONSISTENT AND SOME DOCUMENTS CANT BE FOUND
 9. NO MATERIAL DELIVERY INSPECTION WAS SHOWN DURING AUDIT FOR DELIVERY MATERIALS (PIPES EG)
10. IMPROPER STAGING AND STOCKING OF DELIVERED MATERIALS (REBARS, SKIMCOAT, PVC FITTINGS, SAND/GRAVEL)
11. INTERVIEWED WAREHOUSE STAFF IS NOT AWARE OF THE PROCESS. ROLL OUT STANDARD WAREHOUSE FORM (GATE
PASS) NOT IMPLEMENTED
12. POOR HOUSEKEEPING AT AREA NEAR WAREHOUSE
13. SAND AND GRAVEL DELIVERED AT SITE WAS DIRECTLY CONTACTED WITH GROUND. POSSIBLE FOREIGN MATERIALS
ARE MIXED WITH SAND AND GRAVEL
14. INCONSISTENT ENTRY OF DATA ON STOCK CARD (AS INSPECTED, SAFETY SHOES)
15. WAREHOUSE STAFF IS UNAWARE OF AMLD/ISO PROCESS
16. EVEN TEMPORARY STORAGE, MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY PROTECTED
17. GATE PASS ISSUANCE/MONITORING SHOULD BE PROPERLY IMPLEMENTED (LOG CONTROLLED GATE PASS)
18. LOTS OF MOSQUITOS INSIDE THE WAREHOUSE
19. REARRANGE WAREHOUSE TO BE ACCESSIBLE BY THE STAFF
20. MONITORING INVENTORY OF CONSUMABLES (PACK NAILS EG BY 1/8, ¼ KG) SHOULD BE PROPERLY IMPLEMENTED

CONTROL OF DOCUMENTS
1. ISO MANUAL, PEP MANUAL
2. NO SUBMITTAL OF REGISTRY SHOWN DURING AUDIT
3. ROUTING SLIP MUST BE SIGNED BY PIC
4. TESTING REQUESTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT DOCUMENT CONTROL OFFICE
5. NO RED LINING DRAWINGS
6. NO AS-BUILT DRAWINGS
7. NO TESTING LOGS
8. NO CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE PRODUCED DURING TIME OF AUDIT
9. NO STICKER OF CALIBRATION PUT ON THE EQUIPMENT WHERE YOU CAN SEE THE FOLLOWING
1. COMPANY WHO CALIBRATED
2. DATE OF CALIBRATION
3. DUE DATE OF NEXT CALIBRATION
4. NAME AND SIGNATURE OF PERSON WHO CALIBRARTE
5. SERIAL NO. OF EQUIPMNT CALIBRATED

NCR – NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT

1) USING G.I WIRES TO TIE FORMWORKS SUPPORTS
2) USING REBAR PINS INSTEAD OF HEAVY DUTY PINS
3) NO SUBMITTAL REGISTRY SHOWN DURING THE TIME OF AUDIT
4) NO CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE AND CALIBRATION STICKER NIKON DTM -332 SN. 882809
5) NO AVAILABLE RECORDS DURING THE TIME OF AUDIT FOR REBAR TEST RESULT MONITORING FROM…. TO…
RECORDS SHOULD BE MAINTAINED FOR TRACEABILITY (DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: IMPLEMENTATION
AND OPERATION)
6) AUTO LEVEL MODEL NO. NIKON AC 25 HAS NO UPDATED CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE BUT BEING USED IN THE
PROJECT
7) CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES ARE PROVIDED BUT NO TRACEABILITY TO INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS TO WHICH THE
EQUIPMENT IS CALIBRATED
8) (DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMITY) – LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENT - NO WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT AND
SANITARY PERMIT
9) NO SECURITY CONTRACT
10) NO FIRE ARM LICENSE
11) OPERATIONAL CONTROL – NO APPROVED PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN WAS SHOWN DURING THE TIME OF AUDIT
12) MATERIALS ALREADY USED AT SITE BUT NO CONFIRMATION/ APPROVAL FROM CONSULTANT WAS SHOWN DURING
THE AUDIT.