Austin

EXHIBIT "B"

Independent School District

District Wide Facility Master Plan

Draft – Working Document

January 128,and
February 13, 2011
2011
 AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Draft – Working Document

2/9/2011
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 5

Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6

Facility Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................................. 10
Timeline for Facility Master Plan Implementation......................................................................................................................... 12
Estimated Budget ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14

Area Facility Options ....................................................................................................................................................................... 15

Additional Recommendations........................................................................................................................................................ 33
Facility Operation Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 33
Management Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................... 34
Staffing Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................................... 34
Energy Efficiency Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 35
Maintenance Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 35
Design Recommendations........................................................................................................................................................ 36
Safety and Security Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 36
Use Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................................... 37
Technology Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................... 37
Other Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................................... 38

Facility Summary Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations ..................................................................................... 39

Elementary Schools (Alpha) ............................................................................................................................................................ 40
Middle Schools (Alpha) ................................................................................................................................................................. 120
High Schools (Alpha) ...................................................................................................................................................................... 139
Special Schools (Alpha)................................................................................................................................................................. 152
Support Facilities (Alpha)............................................................................................................................................................... 155

Educational Framework ....................................................................................................................................................................... 169

Planning Guidelines ...................................................................................................................................................................... 169
Programmatic Considerations .................................................................................................................................................... 170

Enrollment Projections ................................................................................................................................................................... 173

Page 1
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Historical Enrollment ...................................................................................................................................................................... 173

Birth Data........................................................................................................................................................................................ 179
Projected Enrollment .................................................................................................................................................................... 180

Capacity Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................................... 182

Utilization ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 184

Facility Condition Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 188

Educational Adequacy Assessment ............................................................................................................................................ 190
Building Deficiencies ...................................................................................................................................................................... 191

Facility Options .............................................................................................................................................................................. 193

Criteria .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 193

Appendices
Appendix A ........................................................................................................................ FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts
Appendix B...................................................................................................................................................Facility Capacity Charts
Appendix C ......................................................................................................................................... Visioning Workshop Summary
Appendix D .................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #1 Results
Appendix E ..................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #2 Results
Appendix F ............................................................................................................................... Community Meeting #3 Comments
Appendix G ............................................................................................................. Summary of Facility Options Discussed by FMPTF
Appendix H.................................................................................................................................................................... Glossary of Terms

Page 2
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our appreciation to the Austin Independent School District Board of Trustees for its commitment
to the Facility Master Planning Process. We realize that the recommendations contained within the plan will create
challenges for the community in the months and years to come. With the support of the school district and community
members, the Austin Independent School District can continue its mission to provide a comprehensive educational
experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to society.

Board of Trustees
Mark Williams, District 5, President
Vincent M. Torres, District 4, Vice President
Lori Moya, District 6, Secretary
Cheryl Bradley, District 1
Sam Guzman, District 2
Christine Brister, District 3
Robert Schneider, District 7
Annette LoVoi, At-Large Position 8
Tamala Barksdale, At-Large Position 9

Austin Independent School District

Dr. Meria Carstarphen, Superintendent of Schools
Lawrence Fryer, Chief Operations Officer
Paul Turner, Executive Director of Facilities
Curt Shaw, Director of Construction Management
Pat Rossett, Assistant Director of Bond Planning
Joe Silva, Assistant Director of Planning
Beth Wilson, Project Facilitator

Page 3
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Facility Master Plan Task Force

We take this opportunity to acknowledge the Facility Mater Plan Task Force for its efforts in guiding the planning process.
We thank the members for their dedication and commitment to this process that resulted in the development of the
facility plan for Austin Independent School District.

Co-Chairs: Richard Frazier

Janet Mitchell

John Alawneh Kelly Evans Paul Mitchell

Larry Amaro Frances Vicki Everett Susan Moffat
Adolphus Anderson Rene Garganta Audrea Moyers
Tony Arnold Greg Goodman Mark Penniman
Frederick Bentley Annette Gregory Elizabeth Polk
Sally Brackett Zoe Griffith Jacqueline Porter
Chris Carrillo-Spano Silas Griggs Pete Price
Jacqueline Chatham Janis Guerrero Douglas Rhodenbaugh
Tommy Cox Kris Hafezizadeh John Rocha
Joey Crumley Bergeron Harris Michelle Rusnak
Bill De Dufour Anne M. Heinen Dave Sanders
Julie Delgado Heath Hignight Curt Shaw
Janet Dewey Lawrence P. Huang David W. Sullivan
Elizabeth Dickey Linda Johnson Kathie Tovo
Dan Diehl Bob King Laura Tuma
Freddie B. Dixon, Sr. J. Laverne Morris-Parker Paul Turner
Martha Dolman Lucia Markert Texanna Turner
Jim Evans Carolyn Merritt Chad Williams

Page 4
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Introduction
Facility Master Plan Vision Statement

All AISD schools will inspire high student achievement and support common community goals through
equitable, inviting facilities that integrate technology and are optimally used, accessible, sustainable, and
meet highest educational adequacy standards.

The Austin Independent School District is committed to
providing high quality and challenging educational
experiences for all students who are enrolled in its
schools. To ensure this commitment, the District
developed the AISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan. As part of
Strategy #4 of that plan, key steps 4.5 and 4.7 included
development of a long-range facility master plan as
follows.
Strategy #4 – align resources to accomplish priorities
within a balanced budget
4.5 Develop and implement long-range plans for
facilities, transportation, libraries and technology
that align infrastructure with the district’s
educational plan
The facility master planning process is a proactive
approach to explore long- and short-term academic
and facility options and solutions. Among the most
important components contributing to the success of the
plan is the involvement and input gathered from Austin
community members.
The recommendations contained within will serve as the
basis from which Austin Independent School District
facilities will be transformed into a new generation of
schools that accommodates educational needs today
and in the future. The final Austin Independent School
District Facility Master Plan will serve as a road map that
will address facility conditions, an implementation
timeframe, and project costs.

4.7 Ensure efficiency and efficacy of existing

facilities before investing in new facilities

This planning process, which is data driven, takes into

consideration enrollments, school building capacities,
educational framework, educational vision, and facility
conditions for 114 school campuses and 12 support
facilities in the District.

Page 5
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
Executive Summary
District Statistics
AISD maintains approximately 87,000 permanent
classroom seats and an additional 16,000 seats in
portable/temporary buildings in 11.5 million square feet
of educational facilities. The enrollment for the 2010-11
school year was approximately 86,000 students. Based
on the latest demographic study, enrollment is projected
to continue to increase to 98,000 by 2020.
 Total Enrollment 2010-2011: 85,929
Grades Pre-K-5: 48,167
Grades 6-8: 16,577
Grades 9-12: 20,662
Separate and Special Campuses: 523
 114 School Campuses
80 Elementary Schools
19 Middle Schools
12 High Schools
3 Special Schools
 12 Support Facilities
Utilization
By the numbers, there is an excess of 1,000 seats in
addition to the capacity in portable buildings. The reality
is that there are some areas experiencing population
growth and others experiencing decline within the
District. Combined with student migration patterns,
there are significantly over- and under-utilized facilities as
a result.
Facility Condition
Approximately $1.1 billion in deficiencies was identified in
the facility condition assessment, including a functional
equity and ADA/TAS analysis, completed in 2010, and
the most recent educational adequacy assessment
completed the summer of 2010. These deficiencies have
been categorized into the following priorities.
Priority 1: Currently Critical (Immediate)
Priority 2: Potentially Critical (To be corrected within one
year)
Priority 3: Necessary / Not Yet Critical (1-2 Years)
Priority 4: Recommended (3-5 Years)
Priority 5: Does Not Meet Current Code/Standards
/Grandfathered
Addressing Growth
The north central and southern areas of AISD continue to
experience the most enrollment growth. The following
new construction programs, funded by current and
previous bond programs, will help address overcrowding
issues.
 Baldwin ES – Opened 2010
 Early Childhood Center – Opens 2012 and will
relieve Linder ES
 New North Central ES – Currently in site selection
process
 New ES – Undesignated
In addition, land acquisition and funding have been
approved for a new middle school site in the
Page 6
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
southeastern part of the District, and a new high school
site in the southern region of the District. The construction
of the middle and high schools is anticipated to be a
part of a future bond program.
As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that
three new elementary schools and additions at seven
elementary schools and one middle school would be
required. Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization
rate as a precipitant for potential new construction or
additions.
Process
In April of 2010, a Facility Master Plan Task Force was
created and an educational planning firm was hired by
AISD in order to develop the District-wide Facility Master
Plan. The Task Force, comprised of parents, community
members, teachers, principals, and AISD staff was
charged with the following tasks.
 Monitor the process to ensure equity and fairness
across the District
 Review and confirm recommendations and
resolve conflicting recommendations
 Prepare information and host community
dialogues and meetings
 Review and analyze data
 Review and analyze community input
 Develop and recommend an Educational
Framework to the Board of Trustees
 Develop facility options to improve efficiency and
address student needs
 Develop and recommend the district-wide Facility
Master Plan to the Board of Trustees
The Facility Master Plan Task Force held 25 meetings over
the course of 10 months and hosted 11 community
meetings. In addition, the Task Force Co-chairs attended
ten meetings at various school campuses throughout the
District. The community meetings provided invaluable
input to the Task Force throughout the process. Results
and comments from these meetings are available in the
appendix of this report.
Challenges
During the process, the Task Force was faced with
several challenges and complex issues associated with
AISD facilities and planning for the future. The following
outline is meant to provide an understanding and
reflection of the real issues with which the Task Force has
been struggling, and the resulting implications for facility
master planning.
Challenge #1: Accomplishing priorities within a shrinking
budget
In order for AISD to continue operating as it is today, an
assessed budget shortfall between $94 and $100 million
for fiscal year 2012 will have to be addressed. Can
increasing facility efficiency decrease the budget
shortfall, and how can this be balanced with the future
of neighborhood schools, their design, size, and
sustainability?
Challenge #2: Student migration
The number of students previously living within the Austin
urban core, has declined over the past 20 years, resulting
in 25% of schools housing less than 85% of their
Page 7
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
permanent student capacities. Conversely, there have
been large population increases in the outer areas of the
District, resulting in 50% of schools housing more than
105% of their permanent student capacities.
However, not all under- and over-utilization is a direct
result of population and demographic shifts. Large
numbers of students that travel outside of the boundary
of their assigned school present a challenge when
making future facility decisions. Should long-term
planning address the number of students living within the
attendance area, or should it address the number of
students currently attending that school, including
transfer students? What are the principles of the current
transfer policies and how will they be applied in the
future?
Challenge #3: The role of facility planning in supporting
and complementing educational program planning
AISD strives to maintain academic standards, programs,
and performance consistently throughout the District.
From a facilities perspective, what recommendations
can be made to help move the District toward
increasing graduation rates and eliminating the
achievement gap? Since programs are capable of
changing faster than bricks and mortar, how can
facilities remain flexible and be retrofitted for multi-use
where practical? How can facility decisions positively
impact student achievement? For example, is it more
beneficial to offer duplicate programs, such as fine arts
or career technology education, or is it better to provide
transportation to a single program? What are the cost
implications?
Challenge #4: Boundary adjustment solutions
A logical solution to improve efficiencies among
overcrowded and under-utilized schools is to adjust the
attendance boundaries and assign more or fewer
students as appropriate. In practice, it is not that simple.
In some cases, under-utilization occurs when a large
number of students migrate to schools outside of their
geographical attendance zone. Increasing the size of
the boundary of the under-utilized school will not fix the
problem. In addition, if the aforementioned migrating
students decided to attend their home schools, the result
could be an overcrowded scenario.
In other cases, there are too many overcrowded or
under-enrolled schools adjacent to each other. This
results in a “domino effect” of moving students from one
location to the other in order to increase or decrease
enrollment. In many instances, students would not be
able to attend the school closest to their homes or in their
neighborhoods. In fact, they may have to drive past a
school closer to their home in order to attend another
school to achieve balanced enrollment.
Challenge #5: Balancing short- and long-term needs
Significant resources will be needed to address the
capital projects outlined in this facility plan. In addition
to the funds needed to renovate AISD’s facility inventory,
additional investment in deferred maintenance and
small capital projects will continue as buildings age. At
the same time, new schools will need to be constructed
to accommodate growth.
Page 8
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Test_

Page 9
 District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
Facility Recommendations
I. Portable Reduction
The annual cost to operate a portable building in AISD
is approximately $4.00 per square foot. The District
currently has 657 portable buildings which equates to
approximately 1,314 classrooms.
The criteria used to identify portable reduction include:
1. A utilization rate (enrollment/permanent
capacity) at the school location that falls
below 85%.
2. Age and condition of the portables
would be used to determine which
portables to take out of service unless
their current location would cause
additional moving costs.
There is a potential to reduce the total number of
portables in the District by 108, using the above criteria
of 85% utilization. Based on a minimum annual
operating cost of $4.00 per square foot, this would
result in an annual savings of $663,552.
II. Funded New Construction
The following new construction projects, funded by
current and previous bond programs, will help address
some overcrowding issues.
 Baldwin ES – Opened 2010
 Early Childhood Center – Opens 2012 and will
relieve Linder ES
 New North Central ES – Currently in site selection
process
 New ES – The Facility Master Plan Task Force
recommends locating the 2008 Bond Program
undesignated ES to the North Central area.
 District-wide Performing Arts Center
III. Unfunded New Construction and Capital
Improvement
 Priority 1 & 2 Needs
Priority 1 & 2 needs identified by the facility condition
assessment during 2007-2010, include currently critical
and potentially critical needs at each school campus
and support facility. The total cost to address these
needs is $366,816,000 phased over eight years.
 Functional Equity
A functional equity study was completed by the District
during 2008-2010. This study identified core areas and
some specialized classrooms, within specific school
campuses that did not meet the current educational
specification standards. The cost to resolve these issues is
approximately $120,000,000, phased over eight years.
 New Schools and Additions
Land acquisition and funding has been approved for a
new middle school site in the southeastern part of the
District, and a new high school site in south Austin. The
construction of the middle and high schools is
anticipated to be a part of a future bond program.
As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that
two additional elementary schools would be required.
Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization rate as a
Page 10
 District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
precipitant for potential new construction or additions.
The unfunded new construction recommendations
include the following:
 Three new elementary schools
 Seven elementary school classroom additions
 One new middle school
 One middle school classroom addition
 One new high school
IV. Closures/Consolidations/Boundaries
Although the Task Force’s recommendations include the
consideration of school closures because of the severity
of the District’s budget short fall, significant concerns
were expressed by some members of the Task Force
regarding the impact of school closures on communities,
especially in those where recent gains in student
performance could be jeopardized.
 Consider consolidating/closing one middle school.
 Consider consolidating/closing eight elementary
schools.
V. Programs Recommendations
 Relocate Alternative Learning Center (ALC)
possibly in a different quadrant of the city .
 Identify a Pre-K-8 school (begin Pre-K-5) to relieve
north central overcrowding. Also, consider this
model in other areas of the district.
 Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to
middle school to relieve overcrowding in
elementary schools and under-utilization in middle
schools.
 Explore Pre-K Centers to address overcrowding
 Conduct intensive planning for School for Young
Men (site TBD based on community input,
feasibility, and availability of funding).
 Conduct planning for district open-enrollment
signature programs and vertical team signature
programs, and their equitable geographic
distribution.
 Complete analysis of changes to district programs
that generate facility needs.
 Conduct planning for Career Tech Hubs (sites TBD
based on community input, feasibility, and
availability of funding).
 Consider options for separating some elementary
schools into Pre-K-3 and 4-8 grade configurations
to address overcrowding.
VI. Policy
 Seriously consider redrawing boundaries in most
critically overcrowded regions where possible.
 Address strict application of transfer policy as it
applies to overcrowding and under-utilization.
VII. Operating Efficiency and Potential Revenue
 Do not renew administrative leases that end in
FY’11.
 Do not renew administrative leases that end in
FY’14.
 Prepare and sell Baker Administrative Center.
 Prepare and sell Carruth Administrative Center.
 Expand District energy efficiency programs,
including coordinated facilities summer shutdowns
where feasible.
 Identify additional energy efficiencies to include in
2012 bond package.
Page 11
 District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Timeline for Facility Master Plan Implementation

FY ‘12
2011-12
Seriously consider
redrawing boundaries in
most critically overcrowded
regions where possible
Preliminary planning for
upcoming bond proposals
(every 4 yrs.)
FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Boundary review and Boundary review and Boundary review and
redraw TBD redraw TBD redraw TBD
Open classroom additions Open classroom additions at Open classroom addition at
at four elementary schools two elementary schools one middle school (requires
(requires future bond (requires bond future future bond funding, $4.8M)
funding, $4.8M each) funding, $4.8M each) Open classroom addition at
one elementary school
(requires future bond
funding, $4.8M)
Consider Consider
consolidating/closing one consolidating/closing four
middle school and four elementary schools
elementary schools
Proposed Bond Program Proposed Bond Program Proposed Bond Program
Election (>$500M*) Election (TBD*) Election (TBD*)

Open Linder Early Open Performing Arts Open new undesignated ES Open new undesignated ES Open new Southeast MS Open new South High
Childhood Center (2008 Center -recommended for North (requires future bond (requires future bond School (requires future bond
Bond funding available, (2008 Bond, funding Central (2008 Bond, funding funding, $24.5M) funding, $55.7M) funding, $106.6M)
$21.6M) available, $40M)_ __ available, $28.1M)__ _
Open North Central Open new undesignated ES
Elementary School (2004 (requires future bond
Bond funding available, funding, $24.5M)_________
$28.1M) Open new undesignated ES
(requires future bond
funding, $24.5M)
Relocate Alternative
Learning Center (consider
possibilities in different
quadrant of the city)
Identify pre-k-8 school Consider options for
(begin pre-k-5) to relieve separating some ES into Pk-
north central elementary 3rd and 4th – 8th to address
school overcrowding. Also, overcrowding__ _
consider this model in other Explore 3rd Pre-k center to
areas of the district. address overcrowding TBD
Consider moving 6th grade Consider moving 6th grade Consider moving 6th grade Consider moving 6th grade
from elementary to middle from elementary to middle from elementary to middle from elementary to middle
school to relieve school to relieve school to relieve school to relieve
overcrowding and overcrowding and overcrowding and overcrowding and
underutilization underutilization underutilization underutilization
Analyze each school to Review application of
determine if limitations to transfer policy for efficacy
transfers/choice options are and fidelity
needed
Note: In 2015-16 projected student enrollment > 92,000
In 2020-21 projected student enrollment > 98,000
*The Bond Program will focus on Priority 1 and 2 building systems renovations, functional equity improvements, and new schools as indicated by demographic projections and the recommendations of a Bond Advisory Committee that are approved
by the Board of Trustees. The specific dates and total bond election amounts must be approved by the Board of Trustees

Page 12
 District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

FY ‘12 FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2
renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional
equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements
(requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond
funding) funding) funding) funding) funding) funding) funding) funding)
Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction
Do not renew administrative Do not renew administrative
leases that finish in FY’11__ leases that finish in FY’14
Explore terminating
administrative leases that
finish in FY’14
Prepare and sell Baker
Prepare and sell CAC
Expand existing district Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to
energy efficiency programs, 95% of baseline 90% of baseline or lower 85% of baseline or lower 80% of baseline or lower 75% of baseline or lower 75% of baseline or lower 75% of baseline or lower 70% of baseline or lower 65% of baseline or lower
including coordinated
facilities summer shutdowns
where feasible___________
Identify additional energy
efficiency facility needs to
include in 2012 bond
package

Programs
Intensive planning for Open School for Young Men
School for Young Men (site (if feasible and funding
TBD based on community available)
input, feasibility, availability
of funding)
Planning for district open-
enrollment signature
programs, and vertical team
signature programs and
their equitable geographic
distribution_____________
Complete analysis of
changes to district programs
that generate facilities
needs
Planning for Career Tech Open Career Tech Hubs
Hubs (locations and funding (1 north, 1 south)
sources TBD)

Note: In 2015-16 projected student enrollment > 92,000

In 2020-21 projected student enrollment > 98,000
*The Bond Program will focus on Priority 1 and 2 building systems renovations, functional equity improvements, and new schools as indicated by demographic projections and the recommendations of a Bond Advisory Committee that are approved
by the Board of Trustees. The specific dates and total bond election amounts must be approved by the Board of Trustees.

Page 13
 District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Estimated Budget

The following tables provide an estimated budget, including estimated costs or savings by year, for the facility
recommendations. The estimated costs or savings are based on AISD budgeted operating costs and recently completed
facility evaluations.

FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTAL

I. Operational Cost Savings

Portable Reductions $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (6,000,000)
Total Cost / (Savings) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (6,000,000)

II. Funded New Construction

Early Childhood Center $ - $ 21,600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21,600,000
New North Central ES $ - $ - $ 28,100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 28,100,000
Performing Arts Center $ - $ - $ 40,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000,000
New ES (North Central) $ - $ - $ - $ 28,100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 28,100,000
Total Cost / (Savings) $ - $ 21,600,000 $ 68,100,000 $ 28,100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 117,800,000

III. Un-Funded New Construction and Capital Improvements

Priority 1 & 2 Needs $ - $ - $ 45,852,000 $ 45,852,000 $ 45,852,000 $ 45,852,000 $ 45,852,000 $ 45,852,000 $ 45,852,000 $ 45,852,000 $ 366,816,000
Functional Equity $ - $ - $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 120,000,000
New Schools
New ES $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000
New ES $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000
New ES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000
New MS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 55,700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 55,700,000
New HS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 106,600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 106,600,000
Additions
4 ES Classroom Additions $ - $ 19,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,200,000
2 ES Classroom Additions $ - $ - $ 9,600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,600,000
1 ES Classroom Addition $ - $ - $ - $ 4,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,800,000
1 MS Classroom Addition $ - $ - $ - $ 4,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,800,000
Total Cost / (Savings) $ - $ - $ 80,052,000 $ 119,452,000 $ 94,952,000 $ 116,552,000 $ 167,452,000 $ 60,852,000 $ 60,852,000 $ 60,852,000 $ 761,016,000

Page 14
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Area Facility Options
The following pages describe, outline, and summarize
facility options by area in the District. The District has
been divided into the 10 following with a map provided
on the following page.
Area 1: Northwest – Anderson HS, Murchison MS, Davis
ES, Doss ES, Hill ES, Summitt ES
Area 2: North Central – Lanier HS, Burnet MS, Dobie MS,
Barrington ES, Cook ES, Graham ES, Hart ES, McBee ES,
Pillow ES, Walnut Creek ES, Wooldridge ES, Wooten ES,
Read Pre-K Center
Area 6: Central – Austin HS, Travis HS, Fulmore MS,
O.Henry MS, Barton Hills ES, Becker ES, Dawson ES, Linder
ES, Pease ES, Travis Heights ES, Zilker ES
Area 7: Southwest – Bowie HS, Bailey MS, Gorzycki MS,
Small MS, Baldwin ES, Baranoff ES, Clayton ES, Kiker ES,
Mills ES, Oak Hill ES, Patton ES
Area 8: South – Crockett HS, Bedichek MS, Covington
MS, Boone ES, Cunningham ES, Galindo ES, Joslin ES, St.
Elmo ES, Sunset Valley ES
Area 9: Southeast – Mendez MS, Blazier ES, Houston ES,
Langford ES, Palm ES, Perez ES, Rodriguez ES, Widen ES

Area 3: Central West – McCallum HS, Lamar MS, Area 10: Far South – Akins HS, Paredes MS, Casey ES,
Brentwood ES, Brown ES, Bryker Woods ES, Casis ES, Gullet Cowan ES, Kocurek ES, Menchaca ES, Odom ES, Pleasant
ES, Highland Park ES, Lee ES, Mathews ES, Pickle ES, Reilly Hill ES, Williams ES
ES, Ridgetop ES

Area 4: Northeast – LASA HS, LBJ HS, Reagan HS, Garcia

MS, Pearce MS, Webb MS, Andrews ES, Blanton ES, Harris
ES, Jordan ES, Maplewood ES, Overton ES, Pecan Springs
ES, Winn ES

Area 5: Central East – Eastside Memorial HS, Kealing MS,

Martin MS, Allan ES, Allison ES, Blackshear ES, Brooke ES,
Campbell ES, Govalle ES, Metz ES, Norman ES, Oak
Springs ES, Ortega ES, Sanchez ES, Sims ES, Zavala ES,
Alternative Learning Center (ALC)

Page 15
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Page 16
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

AREA 1 – NORTHWEST  The middle school, Murchison, is overcrowded

 Anderson High School (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)
 Murchison Middle School  The high school, Anderson, is in the target range of
 Davis, Doss, Hill and Summitt elementary schools percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and
Area Issues 105%)
Based on the number of students living in the area for the Educational Enhancement
2010-11 school year: Academic Ratings:
 The area has a slight deficiency in the number of Exemplary Recognized
seats available at the elementary and middle  Doss ES  Davis ES
school levels.  Hill ES  Murchison MS
 The number of students migrating into the area is  Summitt ES  Anderson HS
higher than the number of students migrating out
of the area at all levels. Future Growth
Elementary School Capacity 2,633 Elementary Migration IN - 478  Moderate population growth is projected in this area in
Elementary School Population 2,731 Elementary Migration OUT - 166 the next five years.
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (98) Net Migration - 312 Facility Condition
 On average, the facilities have an FCI (Facility Condition
Middle School Capacity 1,113 Middle School Migration IN - 220 Index) slightly above the District FCI (26.4%).
Middle School Population 1,171 Middle School Migration OUT - 110 Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (58) Net Mirgation - 110  Construct an eight-classroom addition at one
elementary school.
High School Capacity 2,017 High School Migration IN - 391  Construct an eight-classroom addition at one middle
High School Population 1,962 High School Migration OUT - 257 school.
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 55 Net Migration - 134  Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
Space Utilization improvements.
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Community Impact
 One elementary school, Doss, is severely overcrowded  Consult with the community regarding boundary
(above 125% of permanent capacity) adjustments.
 Two elementary schools, Hill and Summitt, are Cost Savings
overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent  NA
capacity)
 One elementary school, Davis, is in the target range of
percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and
105%)

Page 17
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

AREA 2 – NORTH CENTRAL Space Utilization

 Lanier High School Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
 Burnet and Dobie middle schools  Nine elementary schools, Barrington, Cook,
 Barrington, Cook, Graham, Hart, McBee, Pillow, Graham, Hart, McBee, Read, Walnut Creek,
Wooldridge and Wooten, are severely
Walnut Creek, Wooldridge, Wooten elementary
overcrowded (above 125% of permanent
schools and Read Pre-K Center capacity)
Area Issues  One elementary school, Pillow, is overcrowded
Based on the number of students living in the area for the (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)
2010-11 school year:  One middle school, Burnet, is in the target range
 The area has a severe deficiency in the number of of percent of permanent capacity(between 85%
seats available at the elementary school levels. and 105%), while one middle school, Dobie, is
 The number of students migrating out of the area under enrolled (below 85% of permanent
is higher than the number of students migrating in, capacity)
especially at the elementary and high school  The high school, Lanier, is in the target range of
levels. percent of permanent capacity (between 85%
and 105%)
Efficient Space Utilization Educational Enhancement
Academic Ratings:
Elementary School Capacity 5,568 Elementary Migration IN - 641
Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
Elementary School Population 8,370 Elementary Migration OUT - 1,587
 Graham ES  Cook ES  Barrington ES
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (2,802) Net Migration (946)
 Pillow ES  Hart ES  Walnut Creek ES
 McBee ES  Wooldridge ES
Middle School Capacity 1,941 Middle School Migration IN - 123
 Wooten ES  Burnet MS
Middle School Population 1,889 Middle School Migration OUT - 333
 Dobie MS  Lanier HS
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 52 Net Migration (210)
Future Growth
High School Capacity 1,627 High School Migration IN - 121  Highest population growth in district is projected in
High School Population 1,981 High School Migration OUT - 557 this area in the next five years
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (354) Net Migration (436) Facility Condition
 On average, the facilities have an FCI slightly less
than the District FCI (26.4%), with two elementary
schools and one middle school requiring more
extensive renovations.

Page 18
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan

 Construct two additional elementary schools.
 Construct eight-classroom additions at two
elementary schools.
 Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements.
Community Impact
 Consult with the community regarding middle
school redesign.
 Consult with the community regarding boundary
adjustments.
Cost Savings
NA

Page 19
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

AREA 3 – CENTRAL WEST Space Utilization

 McCallum High School Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
 Lamar Middle School  Two elementary schools, Bryker Woods and
Gullett, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of
 Brentwood, Brown, Bryker Woods, Casis, Gullett,
permanent capacity).
Highland Park, Lee, Mathews, Pickle, Reilly and
 Two elementary schools, Casis and Pickle, are
Ridgetop elementary schools.
overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of
Area Issues permanent capacity)
Based on the number of students living in the area for the  Three elementary schools, Brown, Highland Park
2010-11 school year: and Ridgetop, are over capacity (between 105%
 The area has available seats at the all school and 115% of permanent capacity)
levels.  Three elementary schools, Lee, Mathews and
 The number of students migrating into the area is Reilly, are within the target range of percent of
higher than the number of students migrating out permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)
of the area at all levels.  One elementary school, Brentwood, is under
 Attendance zone population is under 300 students enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)
at two elementary schools, Ridgetop and  The middle school, Lamar, is under enrolled (below
Mathews. 85% of permanent capacity)
 There are two elementary schools, Bryker Woods  The high school, McCallum, is overcrowded
and Ridgetop, that have a permanent capacity (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)
of less than 300 seats. Educational Enhancement
Academic Ratings:
Elementary School Capacity 4,953 Elementary Migration IN - 1,253
Elementary School Population 4,762 Elementary Migration OUT - 623
Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 191 Net Migration - 630  Casis ES  Brentwood ES  Brown ES
 Gullett ES  Bryker Woods ES  Lamar ES
Middle School Capacity 1,008 Middle School Migration IN - 223  Highland  Pickle ES  McCallum HS
Middle School Population 583 Middle School Migration OUT - 191 Park ES  Reilly ES
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 425 Net Migration - 32  Lee ES
 Matthews ES
High School Capacity 1,596 High School Migration IN - 795  Ridgetop ES
High School Population 1,316 High School Migration OUT - 296
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 280 Net Migration - 499

Page 20
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Future Growth
 Moderate population growth is projected in this
area in the next five years.
Facility Condition
 On average, the facilities have an FCI slightly
higher than the District FCI (26.4%), with three
elementary schools requiring more extensive
renovations.
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan
 Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements.
Community Impact
 Consult with community if boundary adjustments
are needed.
Cost Savings
 NA

Page 21
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

AREA 4 – NORTHEAST Space Utilization

 LASA, LBJ and Reagan high schools Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
 Garcia, Pearce and Webb middle schools,  Three elementary schools, Andrews, Harris and
 Andrews, Blanton, Harris, Jordan, Maplewood, Jordan, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of
Overton, Pecan Springs and Winn elementary permanent capacity).
schools.  Three elementary schools, Maplewood, Overton
Area Issues and Pecan Springs, are overcrowded (between
Based on the number of students living in the area for the 115% and 125% of permanent capacity).
2010-11 school year:  Two elementary schools, Blanton and Winn, are
 The area has available seats at the middle and within the target range of percent of permanent
high school levels, but is deficient at the capacity (between 85% and 105%).
elementary school level.  All three middle schools, are under enrolled
 The number of students migrating out of the area (below 85% of permanent capacity).
is higher than the number of students migrating  One high school, Reagan, is under enrolled
into the area at all levels, especially at the middle (below 85% of permanent capacity), while LBJ
and high school levels. and LASA are within the target range of percent
NORTHEAST of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)
Elementary School Capacity 4,301 Elementary Migration IN - 685 Educational Enhancement
Elementary School Population 5,006 Elementary Migration OUT - 849 New Programs for 2011-12:
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (705) Net Migration - (164)  Early College Prep at one middle school
 Early College High School / Early College Start at
Middle School Capacity 3,097 Middle School Migration IN - 93 two high schools
Middle School Population 2,272 Middle School Migration OUT - 665
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 825 Net Mirgation - (572) Academic Ratings:
Acceptable
Exemplary Recognized
High School Capacity 3,430 High School Migration IN - 247  Maplewood
 Blanton ES  Andrews
High School Population 2,635 High School Migration OUT - 1,018 ES
 LASA HS  Harris ES
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 795 Net Migration - (771)  Pecan Springs
 Jordan ES
ES
 Overton ES
 Garcia MS
 Winn ES
 Pearce MS
 Webb MS
 LBJ HS
 Reagan HS

Page 22
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Future Growth
 Significant population growth is projected in this
area in the next five years.
Facility Condition
 On average, the facilities have an FCI (Facility
Condition Index) lower than the District FCI (26.4%),
with two elementary schools requiring more
extensive renovations
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan
 Construct one elementary school.
 Construct an eight classroom addition at one
elementary school.
 Close /consolidate one middle school.
 Adjust boundaries between elementary schools.
 Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements.
Community Impact
 Consult with community regarding plans for
closure/consolidation of one middle school and its
repurposing.
Cost Savings
 Cost savings for closure of one middle school is
$1.8M in M&O savings.
 Capital cost avoidance –$7.4M if one middle school
was closed / consolidated.

Page 23
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

AREA 5 – CENTRAL EAST Space Utilization

 Eastside Memorial High School
 Kealing and Martin middle schools
 Allan, Allison, Blackshear, Brooke, Campbell, Govalle,
Metz, Norman, Oak Springs, Ortega, Sanchez, Sims and
Zavala elementary schools
 Alternative Learning Center (ALC).
Area Issues
Based on the number of students living in the area for the
2010-11 school year:
 The area has available seats at all school levels.
 The number of students migrating out of the area is
higher than the number of students migrating into the
area at the elementary and high schools levels. The
magnet program at Kealing MS results in a higher “in”
migration at the middle school level.
 Attendance zone populations are under 300 students at
three elementary schools, Blackshear, Oak Springs and
Ortega.
Elementary School Capacity 6,639 Elementary Migration IN
Elementary School Population 5,173 Elementary Migration OUT -
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 1,466 Net Migration -
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
 One elementary school, Allison, is over capacity
(between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity)
 Three elementary schools, Brooke, Metz and
Sanchez, are within the target range of percent of
permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)
 Nine elementary schools, Allan, Blackshear,
Campbell, Govalle, Norman, Oak Springs, Ortega,
Sims and Zavala are under enrolled (below 85% of
permanent capacity)
 One middle school, Kealing, is within the target
range of permanent capacity (between 85% and
105%), while Martin is under enrolled (below 85% of
permanent capacity).
 The high school, Eastside Memorial, is under
enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).
- 665
810
(145)

Middle School Capacity 2,136 Middle School Migration IN - 881

Middle School Population 1,597 Middle School Migration OUT - 493
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 539 Net Migration - 388

High School Capacity 1,548 High School Migration IN - 125

High School Population 1,249 High School Migration OUT - 955
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 299 Net Migration - (830)

Page 24
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Educational Enhancement Community Impact

Academic Ratings:  Consult with community to discuss use /
repurposing of elementary schools to be closed
Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
and the relocation of ALC.
 Metz ES  Brooke ES  Allan ES
Cost Savings
 Oak Springs  Norman ES  Allison ES
 Cost savings for closure of four elementary school
ES  Sanchez ES  Blackshear ES
Ortega ES Campbell ES
is $5.1 in M & O savings.
  Zavala ES 
 Sims ES  Govalle ES  Capital cost avoidance - $25.2M if four
Unacceptable elementary schools were closed / consolidated;
 Kealing MS
 Eastside however, it would cost $28M to construct a
 Martin MS
Green HS replacement elementary school.
 Eastside
Global HS
Future Growth
 No significant population growth is projected in
this area in the next five years.
Facility Condition
 On average, the facilities have an FCI above the
District FCI (26.4%), with four elementary schools
and two secondary schools requiring more
extensive renovations.
 There are significant structural issues at the
Alternative Learning Center (ALC).
Facility Master Plan Task Force for 10-Year Plan
 Consolidate / close four elementary schools.
 Construct one replacement elementary school.
 Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements.

Page 25
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

AREA 6 – CENTRAL Space Utilization

Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
 Austin and Travis high schools
 Two elementary schools, Barton Hills and Linder,
 Fulmore and O. Henry middle schools
are severely overcrowded (above 125% of
 Barton Hills, Becker, Dawson, Linder, Pease, Travis
permanent capacity)
Heights and Zilker elementary schools
 Two elementary schools, Travis Heights and Zilker,
Area Issues are over capacity (between 105% and 115% of
Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 permanent capacity).
school year:  One elementary school, Pease, is within the target
 The area has available seats at all school levels. range of percent of permanent capacity
 The number of students migrating into the area is (between 85% and 105%)
higher than the number of students migrating out  Two elementary school, Becker and Dawson, are
of the area at the elementary and middle school under enrolled (below 85% of permanent
levels. There are slightly more students migrating capacity)
out of the area at the high school level.  One middle school, O.Henry, is overcrowded
 Attendance zone populations are under 300 (above 125% of permanent capacity), while
students at four elementary schools, Barton Hills, Fulmore is within the target range of permanent
Becker and Dawson. Pease has fewer than 300 capacity (between 85% and 105%).
students who all from other attendance areas.  One high school, Austin, is overcrowded (above
 Two elementary schools, Barton Hills and Pease, 125% of permanent capacity), while Travis is under
have a permanent capacity of less than 300 seats. enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).
Educational Enhancement
Elementary School Capacity 3,061 Elementary Migration IN - 985
Academic Ratings:
Elementary School Population 2,547 Elementary Migration OUT - 433
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 514 Net Migration - 552 Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
 Barton Hills  Linder ES  Fulmore MS
Middle School Capacity 2,023 Middle School Migration IN - 780 ES  Austin HS  O.Henry MS
Middle School Population 1,354 Middle School Migration OUT - 321  Becker ES  Travis  Travis HS
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 369 Net Migration - 459  Dawson ES Heights ES
 Pease ES
High School Capacity 4,067 High School Migration IN - 936  Zilker ES
High School Population 3,860 High School Migration OUT - 1,126
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 207 Net Migration - (187)

Page 26
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Future Growth
 Moderate population growth is projected in this
area, specifically within the Linder and Travis
Heights attendance zones.
Facility Condition
 With the exception of one elementary with a high
FCI, on average, the facilities have an FCI close to
the District FCI (26.4), with three elementary
schools and one middle school requiring more
extensive renovations.
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan
 Consolidate/close three elementary schools.
 Address priorities 1& 2 and functional equity
improvements.
Community Impact
 Consult with the community regarding the use
closed/consolidated elementary school(s).
Cost Savings
 M&O savings ($2.9M)could be realized if three
elementary schools were closed/consolidated.
 Capital cost avoidance of $25.2M if three
elementary schools were closed/consolidated.

Page 27
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

AREA 7 – SOUTHWEST  Two elementary schools, Clayton and Oak Hill, are
 Bowie high school within the target range of percent of permanent
 Bailey, Gorzycki and Small middle schools capacity (between 85% and 105%)
 Baldwin, Baranoff, Clayton, Kiker, Mills, Oak Hill and  One elementary schools, Baldwin, is under enrolled
Patton elementary schools (below 85% of permanent capacity)
Area Issues  One middle school, Bailey, is within the target range of
Based on the number of students living in the area for the percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and
2010-11 school year: 105%).
 The area has available seats at the middle school level,  Two middle schools, Gorzycki and Small are under
and is slightly deficient at the elementary and high enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)
schools levels.  One high school, Bowie, is over capacity (between
 The number of students migrating into the area is higher 105% and 115% of permanent capacity).
than the number of students migrating out of the area Educational Enhancement
at all levels. Academic Ratings:
No Rating
Elementary School Capacity 5,392 Elementary Migration IN - 633 Exemplary Recognized
 Baldwin ES
 Baranoff ES  Bailey MS
Elementary School Population 5,727 Elementary Migration OUT - 545
 Clayton ES  Bowie HS
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (335) Net Migration - 88
 Kiker ES  Gorzycki MS
 Mills ES  Small MS
Middle School Capacity 3,738 Middle School Migration IN - 487
 Oak Hill ES
Middle School Population 2,844 Middle School Migration OUT - 358
 Patton ES
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 894 Net Migration - 129

High School Capacity 2,535 High School Migration IN - 505

High School Population 2,606 High School Migration OUT - 231
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (71) Net Migration - 274

Space Utilization
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
 Three elementary schools, Kiker, Mills and Patton, are
overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent
capacity)
 One elementary school, Baranoff, is over capacity
(between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity).

Page 28
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Future Growth
 Moderate population growth is projected in this
area at the elementary and middle school levels.
Facility Condition
 On average, the facilities have an FCI well below
the District FCI (26.4%).
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan
 Construct an eight-classroom addition at one
elementary school.
 Adjust boundaries among elementary schools.
 Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
improvements.
Community Impact
 Consult with community regarding boundary
adjustments.
Cost Savings
 NA

Page 29
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

AREA 8 - SOUTH  One middle school, Bedichek, is over capacity

 Crockett High School, (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity)
 Bedichek and Covington middle schools, while Covington is under enrolled (below 85% of
 Boone, Cunningham, Galindo, Joslin, St. Elmo and permanent capacity
Sunset Valley elementary schools.  The high school, Crockett, is under enrolled (below
Area Issues 85% of permanent capacity)
Based on the number of students living in the area for the 
2010-11 school year: Educational Enhancements
 The area has available seats at the elementary Academic Ratings:
and high school levels, and is slightly deficient at Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
the middle schools level.  Joslin ES  Boone ES  Cunningham ES
 The number of students migrating out of the area  Sunset  Galindo ES  Bedichek MS
is higher than the number of students migrating Valley ES  St. Elmo ES  Covington MS
into the area, especially at the middle and high  Crockett HS
school levels. Future Growth
Elementary School Capacity 3,436 Elementary Migration IN - 566  Moderate population growth projected in the
Elementary School Population 2,921 Elementary Migration OUT - 656 area.
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 515 Net Migration - (90) Facility Condition
 On average, the facilities have an FCI above the
Middle School Capacity 2,066 Middle School Migration IN - 281 District FCI (26.4%) with four elementary schools
Middle School Population 2,124 Middle School Migration OUT - 508 requiring more extensive renovations.
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (58) Net Migration - (227) Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan
 Consolidate/close one elementary school.
High School Capacity 2,163 High School Migration IN - 285  Adjust boundaries between high schools (Akins
High School Population 1,883 High School Migration OUT - 510 and Crockett).
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 280 Net Migration - (225)  Address Priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
Space Utilization improvements.
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Community Impact
 Two elementary schools, Galindo and Joslin, are  Consult with the community regarding closure and
within the target range of percent of permanent repurposing of elementary school.
capacity (between 85% and 105%) Cost Savings
 Four elementary schools, Boone, Cunningham, St.  Cost savings for closure of elementary school is
Elmo and Sunset Valley, are under enrolled (below $1.26M in M&O savings.
85% of permanent capacity)  Capital cost avoidance –$8.4M.

Page 30
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

AREA 9 – SOUTHEAST Education Enhancement

 Mendez middle school, Academic Ratings:
 Blazier, Houston, Langford, Palm, Perez, Rodriguez Acceptable
Recognized
and Widen elementary schools.  Houston ES  Blazier ES
Area Issues  Palm ES  Langford ES
Based on the number of students living in the area for the  Perez ES  Rodriguez ES
2010-11 school year:  Mendez MS
 The area is severely deficient in the number of  Widen ES
seats at the elementary level, and is slightly
deficient at the middle school level. Future Growth
 The number of students migrating out of the area  Moderate population growth is projected in this
is higher than the number of students migrating area.
into the area. Facility Condition
Elementary School Capacity 4,637 Elementary Migration IN - 503  On average, the facilities have an FCI that is
Elementary School Population 6,109 Elementary Migration OUT - 865 below the District FCI (26.4%), with one elementary
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (1,472) Net Migration - (362) school requiring more extensive renovations.
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan
Middle School Capacity 1,215 Middle School Migration IN - 27  Evaluate reduction of portables at middle school.
Middle School Population 1,266 Middle School Migration OUT - 396  Construct eight-classroom additions at two
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (51) Net Migration - (369) elementary schools.
 Adjust boundaries among area elementary
Space Utilization schools to reduce overcrowding.
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:  Adjust boundaries among area middle schools.
 Four elementary schools, Blazier, Houston, Perez and  Address priority 1& 2 and functional equity
Rodriguez, are severely overcrowded (over 125% of improvements
permanent capacity). Community Impact
 Two elementary schools, Langford and Widen, are  Consult with the community regarding elementary
overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent and middle school boundary adjustments.
capacity). Cost Savings
 One elementary school, Palm, is within the target range  NA
of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and
105%).
 The middle school, Mendez, is under enrolled (below
85% of permanent capacity).
 There is no high school in this area.

Page 31
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

AREA 10 – FAR SOUTH  Two elementary schools, Casey and Kocurek, are within
 Akins High School the target range of percent of permanent capacity
 Paredes Middle School (between 85% and 105%.)
 Casey, Cowan, Kocurek, Menchaca, Odom,  The middle school, Paredes, is under enrolled (below
Pleasant Hill and Williams elementary schools 85% of permanent capacity)
Area Issues  The high school, Akins, is over capacity (between 105%
Based on the number of students living in the area for the and 115% of permanent capacity.
2010-11 school year: Educational Enhancement
 The area is deficient is the number of seats at the Academic Ratings:
elementary and high school levels. Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
 The number of students migrating out of the area  Cowan ES  Akins HS  Casey ES
is higher than the number of students migrating  Paredes MS  Kocurek ES
into the area, especially at the middle and high  Menchaca ES
school levels.  Odom ES
Elementary School Capacity 4,286 Elementary Migration IN - 773  Pleasant Hill ES
Elementary School Population 4,819 Elementary Migration OUT - 873  Williams ES
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (533) Net Migration - (100) Future Growth
 No significant population growth is projected in
Middle School Capacity 1,156 Middle School Migration IN - 69 the area for the elementary and middle school
Middle School Population 1,165 Middle School Migration OUT - 291 levels; however, continued moderate growth is
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (9) Net Migration - (222) projected at the high school level.
Facility Condition
High School Capacity 2,394 High School Migration IN - 176  On average, the facilities have an FCI below the
High School Population 3,092 High School Migration OUT - 596 District FCI (26.4%), with two elementary schools
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (698) Net Migration - (420)
requiring more extensive renovations.
Space Utilization Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:  Priority 1& 2 and functional equity improvements.
 Three elementary schools, Cowan, Odom and Pleasant  Adjust boundaries between high schools (Akins
Hill, are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of and Crockett to reduce overcrowding).
permanent capacity) Community Impact
 Two elementary schools, Menchaca and Williams, are  Consult with community regarding high school
over capacity (between 105% and 115% permanent boundary adjustments and possible elementary
capacity) boundary adjustments.
Cost Savings
 NA

Page 32
 District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
Additional Recommendations
The Facilities Master Plan Task Force recommends the
following District-wide initiatives and policy
recommendations. Some recommendations may
require additional planning and research from other AISD
departments and outside entities. The Task Force does
not want to lose sight of these very important ideas and
recognizes that the Facility Master Plan is a dynamic
document and should be updated periodically to
incorporate building improvements, updates in
community demographics, and changes in educational
programming.
I. Policy Recommendations
1. Consider school closures only after all other
alternatives and options, both programmatic and
facilities use, have been thoroughly examined
and discussed with the affected communities.
2. Create a community engagement process, led
by the Superintendent and the Senior Leadership
Team, to work directly with the local community
as part of the implementation planning process.
3. Establish a standing committee of parents,
teachers, district staff, and other stakeholders
(e.g., City, Chamber of Commerce, realtors) to
track and maintain the Facility Master Plan over
time.
4. Conduct campus assessments for future bond
work in consultation with each school's Campus
Advisory Council to ensure accurate, first-hand
knowledge of campus conditions and priorities.
For continuity, each campus will maintain a
Facilities Improvement Plan documenting prior
campus evaluations, including a Principal's Log,
in which the principal or his/her designee will
record relevant discussions regarding how the
campus facilities are functioning and note any
concerns for future administrators and CACs.
5. When new schools or consolidations are being
considered, first evaluate existing District sites
(both presently undeveloped or in use) and
determine if any are candidates for new
construction, renovation, or re-construction. This
may assist the District in locating schools in better
locations than can be achieved with the
purchase of new land.
6. Continue to identify ways to improve
collaborative planning with the City of Austin.
[See AISD/COA/Travis County joint resolution that
specifically commits these entities to
collaboration on planning efforts that include
AISD's Facilities Master Plan and the City's
Comprehensive Plan.]
Page 33
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
7. District Departments/staff should be moved into
available spaces at under-utilized schools so that
the District may sell valuable property, avoid
leasing buildings and allow for all schools to
remain open.
8. Aggressively pursue joint-use opportunities for
existing underutilized campuses, as well as new
facilities; potential partners include the City of
Austin, Central Health/CommUnityCare, and arts
organizations and other nonprofit organizations.
9. Closed schools should be reused by the District or
another governmental entity for office/
administrative use, or by another educational
user, and then returned to use as AISD
instructional space when student population
growth makes it prudent.
10. Review current District transfer policies and
implementation, in particular using campus’
“permanent capacity”, as opposed to
“functional capacity” when evaluating available
space.
11. Analyze current “out migration” trends from
campus/zones to understand the underlying
issues, AND then address those issues in order to
support the return of students to their
neighborhood schools.
12. Conduct a complete review of the day-to-day
application of the district's transfer policy,
regardless of overcrowding or underutilization.
Include the impact that “out migration” can have
on under-utilized schools as much as “in migration
can impact overcrowded schools.
13. Support the neighborhood school model.
II. Management Recommendations
14. Institute a well-defined system for handling
maintenance requests that is communicated in
writing to all staff at the start of each school year
including:
 how and to whom to report a
maintenance issue, and how to receive
the estimated time for a response,
 how to track a maintenance request
electronically in real time,
 who to contact if the contractor or
maintenance person fails to arrive,
 what to do if work is poorly completed or is
incomplete, and
 who is responsible for signing off on
completed work.
III. Staffing Recommendations
15. Develop a plan to supervise custodians centrally
to allow more flexibility in the use of resources,
reduce overtime costs through flexible
scheduling, improved supervision and quality
control, and improved facility scheduling and
energy management.
Page 34
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
16. Consolidate maintenance functions, including
field maintenance for athletic fields, under the
Maintenance Department to provide more
efficient and flexible use of available resources.
IV. Energy Efficiency Recommendations
17. Implement a centrally supervised summer
custodial program to achieve cost reductions by
returning some custodians on each campus,
through attrition, to a 10-month employment
year.
18. Continue the current District focus on energy
usage reduction through more efficient
equipment, technology applications to manage
the operation of buildings more effectively, and
engagement of campus and facility occupants
to assist working toward the goal of reduced
usage.
19. Continue efforts toward a coordinated shutdown
of facilities in the summer months as is feasible.
20. As soon as feasible, fund energy coordinator
position to implement and monitor energy
savings initiatives at campuses. Savings
generated from funding this position would more
than offset the cost.
21. Implement an educational campaign to raise or
lower thermostats in schools four degrees.
(Estimates based on examples project savings of
between 5% and 20%.)
22. Continue to upgrade and improve data and
systems to measure utility usage by campus.
V. Maintenance Recommendations
23. Institute bond counsel-approved strategies to
designate funds for building system renovations in
future bond programs to protect the District’s
capital investments.
24. Include furniture and equipment replacement
schedule in the next bond program scope of
work; invest in high quality equipment that will not
require frequent maintenance or replacement.
25. Institute industry-standard performance measures
for bond programs, per the 2009 MGT Efficiency
Study, to maintain and publish the following types
of data: cost per foot of construction projects
compared to peer districts and regional and
national averages, final estimate compared to
final bid, change-order rate, completion
schedules, consultant ratings.
Page 35
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
VI. Design Recommendations
26. Engage in public/private partnerships in the siting,
engineering, and design of “healthy” schools and
neighborhood environments that support
increased outdoor physical activities for children
and their families.
27. Explore flexible design for future school facilities to
accommodate population fluctuations. Some
strategies include implementing consistent
building designs with modular components that
may expand or contract with student population
changes, or using a Mobile Technology unit that
allows specialized equipment to be shared by
two or more campuses for a portion of a year.
28. Create flexible learning spaces, where students
can work in groups utilizing the wireless network
with portable devices.
VII. Safety and Security Recommendations
29. Design large-scale facilities to provide suitable
space for multiple uses such as conferences,
meetings, and professional development (ideally
in conjunction with other local governmental
partners to share costs and maintenance).
30. Design, construct and operate high-performance
schools and other facilities that are sensitive to
natural resource use, conserve energy and
water, reduce pollution and waste, promote and
attract active transportation by healthy outdoor
design that includes, but is not limited to, bicycle
racks for students within a two-mile radius of a
campus and outdoor space designed for multi-
purpose neighborhood and community use.
31. The site selection process for high-performance
schools and other faculties should include a
matrix that rewards the availability of mass
transportation options that include, but are not
limited to, Capital Metro buses, commuter rail,
and metro rail to reduce transportation costs and
the carbon footprint of a facility.
32. To avoid the costs of building and maintaining
additional high schools, pursue options such as 7
a.m. to 8 p.m. schedules that offer challenging
curriculums, distance learning, and advanced
placement courses. Online courses could also be
more widely implemented and available to all
students.
33. Make safe walkable routes a priority when
constructing or repurposing school facilities.
34. Assess nighttime security and add security
cameras and lighting in high need areas.
35. Work with appropriate entities to encourage
construction of fences and barriers at railroad
crossings.
Page 36
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
36. Ensure the installation of adequate public address
and alarm systems in all schools, including all
portables.
37. Address campus traffic issues as identified by the
campus.
VIII. Use Recommendations
38. Increase building rental rates to increase cost-
recovery for community use of schools.
39. Appropriately consolidate students in
underutilized campuses to make available as
much classroom space as possible, and issue
Requests for Proposals to identify educational
groups or childcare providers interested in leasing
excess space and assuming or sharing
maintenance and operation costs.
40. Implement an aggressive marketing campaign to
rent the Burger Activity and Delco Activity centers
to interested parties for conferences, athletic
events, and other activities.
IX. Technology Recommendations
41. Design “Twenty-first Century Classrooms,” media
rich classrooms with projectors, audio system,
document cameras, and interactive tools.
42. Expand the staff use of online meeting software
(live video/audio/screen sharing) to facilitate
communication and allow people in different
spaces to be in the same space virtually. “Green”
meetings reduce employee travel time and have
a smaller carbon footprint.
43. Institute cloud computing with anytime/anywhere
access that works with all computer types and
devices.
44. Use Web 2.0 tools to communicate, collaborate,
and create.
45. Use tools such as video “chat” to expand beyond
the classroom (i.e., virtual field trips, interactions
with other students from across town, or across the
globe).
46. Create a single web entry point (portal) with single
sign-on for all student and teacher resources in
one place.
47. Increase use of online assessment tools to receive
results more quickly and reduce paper usage, i.e.,
dashboards.
48. Improve access to meaningful student data to
guide instructional decisions.
49. Create online courses for students and teacher
professional development which would be
conducted entirely online and blended with face-
to-face and online contact.
Page 37
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
50. Increase use of mobile computing (including
personal devices such as smart phones) and
mobile devices (netbooks). Fewer desktop
computers (use less energy, smaller foot print,), less
need for dedicated traditional computer lab.
X. Other Recommendations
51. Assess administrative fees for general, sibling, or
tracking school transfers, with no fee for students
qualified for free and reduced lunch, and with
provisions for hardship waivers.
52. Consider the feasibility of sharing administrative
staff or resources and services among small
campuses.
53. Initiate a district-wide boundary assessment and
possible realignment beginning January 2012, to
balance enrollment and improve vertical
alignment.
54. Determine cost effectiveness of duplicating
special programs in different areas of the District
versus providing transportation to a single
program.
Page 38
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Facility Summary Data Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations

The following pages include a summary of each facility with the information listed below, in alphabetical order by school
type (ES, MS, HS). Support facilities are included subsequent to the school summaries.

 School ID number, name, and address  2015-16 Projected Attendance Zone Population
 Grades served  2010-11 In Migration
 Permanent and portable/temporary square  2010-11 Out Migration
footage  Site size and number of parking spaces
 Number of classrooms  Individual building data
 Permanent Capacity  Facility condition data
 2010-11 Enrollment  Deficiency costs by building system and priority
 2010-11 Attendance Zone Population  Facility master plan recommendations

Page 39
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Facility Summary Data Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations

The following pages include a summary of each facility with the information listed below, in alphabetical order by school
type (ES, MS, HS). Support facilities are included subsequent to the school summaries.

 School ID number, name, and address  2015-16 Projected Attendance Zone Population
 Grades served  2010-11 In Migration
 Permanent and portable/temporary square  2010-11 Out Migration
footage  Site size and number of parking spaces
 Number of classrooms  Individual building data
 Permanent Capacity  Facility condition data
 2010-11 Enrollment  Deficiency costs by building system and priority
 2010-11 Attendance Zone Population  Facility master plan recommendations

Page 39
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

142 Allan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

4900 Gonzales Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1957 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 112,608 112,608
Area (GSF) per student 297 0 297
Number of Classrooms 42 0 42
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 379
Utilization (by enrollment) 56% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 354 319
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 53%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 364 309 Perm Buildings 112,608 32.1%
2010-11 In Migration 057 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 031 Building A 1 1957 100,939 29.9%
Building B 1 1958 10,577 32.1%
Site Data Mechanical 1 1957 1,092 66.3%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.5
Parking Spaces 72

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $158,480 $85,341 - $243,821 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,427,562*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $2,942 $2,797,431 $36,448 - $2,836,821
Interior - - $458,209 $323,054 - $781,263
Mechanical $57,435 $9,454 $724,886 - - $791,775
Electrical - $1,960,083 $300,188 $21,979 - $2,282,251
Plumbing $708,176 - $1,399,232 $11,768 - $2,119,176
Fire & Life Safety $141,494 $98,779 $2,617 - - $242,889
Technology - $87,750 $494,081 - - $581,831
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $423,699 $80,329 - $504,028
Other $225,024 $136,426 - - $800,915 $1,162,365
Total $1,132,129 $2,295,433 $6,758,822 $558,919 $800,915 $11,546,218
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

142
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Allan ES
Page 40
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

101 Allison Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)

515 Vargas Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78741 1955 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,426 7,680 69,106
Area (GSF) per student 113 14 127
Number of Classrooms 30 9 39
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 543
Utilization (by enrollment) 112% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 585 -99
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 120%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 590 -104 Perm Buildings 61,426 20.3%
2010-11 In Migration 031 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 079 Building A 1 1955 61,426 20.1%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 61

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $2,222 $67,896 - - $70,119 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,701,604*
Roofing - - $7,992 - - $7,992
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $435 $49,328 - - $49,763
Interior - $131,348 $250,466 $115,111 - $496,925
Mechanical - $823,369 $742,003 - - $1,565,371
Electrical - $230,499 $412,417 $11,881 - $654,797
Plumbing - - $251,501 $9,629 - $261,130
Fire & Life Safety $106,267 $72,572 $2,617 - - $181,456
Technology - $91,138 $447,192 - - $538,330
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $37,014 $73,394 - $110,407
Other $67,350 $176,405 - - $10,288 $254,043
Total $173,617 $1,527,987 $2,268,426 $210,014 $10,288 $4,190,332
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

101
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Allison ES
Page 41
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

102 Andrews Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

6801 Northeast Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1962 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 58,376 10,752 69,128
Area (GSF) per student 81 15 96
Number of Classrooms 31 14 45
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 717
Utilization (by enrollment) 147% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 692 -206
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 142%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 764 -278 Perm Buildings 58,376 29.5%
2010-11 In Migration 061 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 075 Building A 1 1962 53,954 32.1%
Building B 1 1986 4,422 7.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.7
Parking Spaces 39

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $49,858 $150,146 - - $200,004 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,838,101*
Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $13,720 - - $13,720
Interior - $128,866 $481,123 $44,545 - $654,533
Mechanical - $1,372,878 $1,042,888 $22,487 - $2,438,253
Electrical - $260,909 $362,040 $35,208 - $658,157
Plumbing $239,166 - $327,938 $5,350 - $572,454
Fire & Life Safety $109,536 $73,733 - - - $183,268
Technology - $102,282 $476,976 - - $579,258
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $343,330 $83,069 - $426,399
Other $225,239 $255,049 - - $1,372,504 $1,852,792
Total $573,941 $2,264,160 $3,198,161 $190,659 $1,372,504 $7,599,425
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

102
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Andrews ES
Page 42
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

187 Baldwin Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

Yr. Open Rating Historic
, Texas 0 No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 86,751 86,751
Area (GSF) per student 171 0 171
Number of Classrooms 38 0 38
Permanent Capacity 669
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 508
Utilization (by enrollment) 76% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 557 112
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 642 27 Perm Buildings 86,751 0.0%
2010-11 In Migration 036 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 081 Building A 2 2010 86,751

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) .0
Parking Spaces

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - - - $0 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $000*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - - - - - $0
Mechanical - - - - - $0
Electrical - - - - - $0
Plumbing - - - - - $0
Fire & Life Safety - - - - - $0
Technology - - - - - $0
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - - - - $0
Other - - - - - $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

187
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Baldwin ES
Page 43
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

182 Baranoff Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)

12009 Buckingham Gate Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1999 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 80,088 6,144 86,232
Area (GSF) per student 91 7 98
Number of Classrooms 44 8 52
Permanent Capacity 794
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 876
Utilization (by enrollment) 110% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 891 -97
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 874 -80 Perm Buildings 80,088 11.0%
2010-11 In Migration 081 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 093 Building A 1 1999 69,092 12.4%
Classroom 1 2008 10,996 5.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.6
Parking Spaces 84

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $9,548 - - $9,548 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $818,493*
Roofing - $4,702 $521,184 - - $525,885
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $5,556 - - $5,556
Interior $926 $42,710 $270,274 $9,202 - $323,112
Mechanical - $57,841 $43,918 - - $101,759
Electrical - - $95,977 $24,556 - $120,533
Plumbing - $24,586 $27,074 $18,259 - $69,920
Fire & Life Safety $126,088 $72,942 $2,617 - - $201,648
Technology - $278,827 $631,528 - - $910,355
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $117,320 $225,980 - $343,300
Other $70,859 $89,370 - - $121,554 $281,783
Total $197,873 $620,619 $1,724,996 $277,997 $121,554 $2,943,039
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

182
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Baranoff ES
Page 44
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

149 Barrington Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)

400 Cooper Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78753 1969 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,971 21,504 100,475
Area (GSF) per student 79 22 101
Number of Classrooms 41 24 65
Permanent Capacity 655
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 996
Utilization (by enrollment) 152% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 955 -301
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 146%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,098 -444 Perm Buildings 78,971 21.2%
2010-11 In Migration 084 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 086 Building A 1 1969 50,792 36.9%
Building B 1 1999 15,285 4.6%
Site Data Building C 1 2010 100
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.1 Building D 1 2010 12,794 0.0%
Parking Spaces 68

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $7,043 $71,576 $54,752 - $133,371 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,012,002*
Roofing - $6,812 - - - $6,812
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $19,209 - - $19,209
Interior - $11,761 $448,982 $46,058 - $506,802
Mechanical $58,895 $16,736 $3,233,378 - - $3,309,009
Electrical $22,712 $95,267 $178,528 $32,952 - $329,459
Plumbing - - $348,757 $50,558 - $399,315
Fire & Life Safety $143,452 $84,850 - - - $228,302
Technology - $55,147 $523,988 - - $579,135
Conveyances - $198,566 - - - $198,566
Specialties - - $174,501 $127,022 - $301,523
Other $104,890 $205,872 - - $2,516,731 $2,827,493
Total $329,948 $682,054 $4,998,919 $311,342 $2,516,731 $8,838,995
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

149
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Barrington ES
Page 45
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

103 Barton Hills Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)

2108 Barton Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1964 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 38,291 10,752 49,043
Area (GSF) per student 99 28 127
Number of Classrooms 14 13 27
Permanent Capacity 251
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 386
Utilization (by enrollment) 154% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 203 48
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 81%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 199 52 Perm Buildings 38,291 33.4%
2010-11 In Migration 172 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 021 Building A 1 1964 32,101 36.3%
Building B 1 1964 2,985 22.0%
Site Data Band 1 2007 3,205 0.5%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Parking Spaces 43

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $92,862 - - $97,468 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,341,787*
Roofing $1,970 - $455,160 - - $457,130
Structural $15,245 - $769 - - $16,014
Exterior - - $106,348 $383,049 - $489,397
Interior - - $430,620 $9,067 - $439,687
Mechanical - $19,430 $167,197 - - $186,627
Electrical $24,143 $55,790 $367,319 $9,030 - $456,282
Plumbing $144,398 - $155,949 $17,190 - $317,537
Fire & Life Safety $85,700 $65,351 - - - $151,052
Technology - $41,851 $188,065 - - $229,916
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $126,541 $28,851 - $155,393
Other $750,812 $1,082,848 - - $14,346 $1,848,006
Total $1,022,269 $1,319,518 $2,090,831 $447,186 $14,346 $4,894,150
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

103
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Barton Hills ES
Page 46
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

104 Becker Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

906 Milton St. West Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1936 EX Yes

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 59,670 3,072 62,742
Area (GSF) per student 287 15 302
Number of Classrooms 33 3 36
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 208
Utilization (by enrollment) 40% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 226 298
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 43%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 256 268 Perm Buildings 59,670 37.1%
2010-11 In Migration 069 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 086 Building A 1 1936 56,835 35.7%
Mechanical 1 1939 499 24.0%
Site Data Building C 1 1936 1,237 19.1%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.7 Building D 1 1936 1,099 21.6%
Parking Spaces 0

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,927 $322,468 $2,225 - $329,620 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,247,499*
Roofing - $537,027 $32,984 $24,829 - $594,840
Structural - $7,792 - - - $7,792
Exterior - - $8,103 $19,303 - $27,407
Interior - $44,583 $185,538 $78,717 - $308,838
Mechanical $901,466 $1,168,099 $599,661 - - $2,669,227
Electrical - $174,132 $299,288 $7,366 - $480,786
Plumbing $29,802 - $1,459,600 $16,046 - $1,505,449
Fire & Life Safety $94,218 $62,525 - - - $156,743
Technology - $47,064 $354,610 - - $401,674
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $76,656 $99,315 - $175,971
Other $89,415 $86,448 - - $202,026 $377,889
Total $1,114,902 $2,132,597 $3,338,909 $247,800 $202,026 $7,036,234
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

104
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Becker ES
Page 47
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

105 Blackshear Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

1712 East 11th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1937 AA Yes

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 70,726 70,726
Area (GSF) per student 290 0 290
Number of Classrooms 37 0 37
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 244
Utilization (by enrollment) 41% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 288 310
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 48%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 275 323 Perm Buildings 70,726 34.7%
2010-11 In Migration 021 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 058 Building A 1 1937 70,726 31.7%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.3
Parking Spaces 52

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $170,707 $95,689 - $266,396 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,709,054*
Roofing - $1,423 $561,069 - - $562,491
Structural $4,394 - - - - $4,394
Exterior - $3,341 $452,580 $575,423 - $1,031,344
Interior $4,532 - $385,878 $3,206 - $393,616
Mechanical - $1,842,538 $922,533 - - $2,765,071
Electrical - $187,699 $578,074 $25,070 - $790,843
Plumbing - - $324,886 $10,698 - $335,584
Fire & Life Safety $101,399 $65,038 $2,617 - - $169,055
Technology - $77,782 $332,300 - - $410,082
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $55,364 $86,450 - $141,814
Other $77,822 $343,085 - - $58,019 $478,927
Total $188,148 $2,520,906 $3,786,009 $796,536 $58,019 $7,349,617
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

105
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Blackshear ES
Page 48
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

106 Blanton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

5408 Westminster Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1964 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 71,817 9,216 81,033
Area (GSF) per student 122 16 137
Number of Classrooms 40 8 48
Permanent Capacity 636
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 591
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 630 6
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 99%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 799 -163 Perm Buildings 71,817 20.8%
2010-11 In Migration 078 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 157 Building A 1 1964 56,530 20.8%
Building B 1 1964 3,546 25.0%
Site Data Building C 1 2000 11,424 6.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.0 Greenhouse 1 2004 317 33.5%
Parking Spaces 75

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $455,018 - - $455,018 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,809,169*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $2,793 - - $2,793
Interior - $106,775 $205,441 $46,975 - $359,191
Mechanical - $587,738 $614,997 - - $1,202,735
Electrical - $145,055 $825,421 $7,524 - $978,000
Plumbing $326,183 - $202,524 $31,163 - $559,870
Fire & Life Safety $124,149 $89,652 $2,617 - - $216,419
Technology - $53,729 $536,877 - - $590,606
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $123,565 $145,047 - $268,613
Other $192,446 $84,158 - - $59,146 $335,750
Total $642,778 $1,166,391 $2,969,253 $230,709 $59,146 $5,068,277
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

106
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Blanton ES
Page 49
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

185 Blazier Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

8601 Vertex Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78747 2008 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 82,897 10,752 93,649
Area (GSF) per student 107 14 121
Number of Classrooms 38 10 48
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 775
Utilization (by enrollment) 130% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 896 -298
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 150%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 993 -395 Perm Buildings 82,897 5.1%
2010-11 In Migration 049 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 168 Building A 1 2008 82,897 4.3%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.4
Parking Spaces 95

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $508 $40,134 - $40,642 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $314,660*
Roofing - - $21,733 - - $21,733
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - $64,065 $88,422 $12,027 - $164,514
Mechanical $11,527 - - - - $11,527
Electrical - - $23,877 $48,516 - $72,393
Plumbing - - $138,990 $17,118 - $156,108
Fire & Life Safety $125,254 $44,081 - - - $169,335
Technology - $69,732 $592,476 - - $662,208
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $31,404 $87,917 - $119,321
Other - - - - - $0
Total $136,781 $177,879 $897,410 $205,711 $0 $1,417,781
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

185
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Blazier ES
Page 50
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

170 Boone Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

8101 Croftwood Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 1986 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 73,690 73,690
Area (GSF) per student 147 0 147
Number of Classrooms 42 0 42
Permanent Capacity 752
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 501
Utilization (by enrollment) 67% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 478 274
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 64%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 468 284 Perm Buildings 73,690 17.4%
2010-11 In Migration 130 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 106 Building A 1 1986 63,673 17.2%
Building B 1 1998 10,017 7.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.5
Parking Spaces 82

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - $124,792 - $124,792 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $863,014*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $8,356 - - $8,356
Exterior - $9,899 - - - $9,899
Interior - - $186,388 $50,972 - $237,360
Mechanical $1,502 - $1,424,842 - - $1,426,344
Electrical - - $38,018 $34,099 - $72,117
Plumbing $100,893 - $214,827 $7,492 - $323,212
Fire & Life Safety $105,015 $71,301 - - - $176,316
Technology - $54,170 $629,580 - - $683,750
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $104,863 $130,565 - $235,429
Other $273,625 $246,609 - - $318,391 $838,626
Total $481,035 $381,979 $2,606,876 $347,921 $318,391 $4,136,202
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

170
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Boone ES
Page 51
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

107 Brentwood Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

6700 Arroyo Seco Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1951 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 62,891 3,072 65,963
Area (GSF) per student 127 6 133
Number of Classrooms 33 3 36
Permanent Capacity 585
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 495
Utilization (by enrollment) 85% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 456 129
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 78%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 450 135 Perm Buildings 62,891 23.2%
2010-11 In Migration 149 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 110 Building A 1 1951 62,319 22.1%
Building B 1 1951 572
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 16.7
Parking Spaces 68

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $12,102 - $60,185 - - $72,287 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,379,472*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $7,945 - - $7,945
Exterior - - $134,776 - - $134,776
Interior - $868 $682,430 $45,770 - $729,067
Mechanical $33,509 $372,314 $787,027 - - $1,192,849
Electrical - $203,390 $179,931 $27,524 - $410,846
Plumbing - - $572,536 $10,701 - $583,236
Fire & Life Safety $99,872 $69,505 - - - $169,376
Technology - $47,732 $448,626 - - $496,358
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $108,798 $106,218 - $215,016
Other $141,131 $399,050 - - $1,442,616 $1,982,797
Total $286,613 $1,092,859 $2,982,254 $190,212 $1,442,616 $5,994,554
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

107
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Brentwood ES
Page 52
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

108 Brooke Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

3100 East 4th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1954 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 52,282 3,858 56,140
Area (GSF) per student 119 9 128
Number of Classrooms 27 5 32
Permanent Capacity 430
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 439
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 441 -11
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 103%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 471 -41 Perm Buildings 52,282 32.6%
2010-11 In Migration 075 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 081 Building A 1 1954 52,282 32.0%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.9
Parking Spaces 43

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $35,849 - - $35,849 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,835,684*
Roofing - $443,263 - - - $443,263
Structural - - $1,461 - - $1,461
Exterior - - $89,580 $13,732 - $103,312
Interior - $64,065 $139,423 $324,182 - $527,670
Mechanical - - $1,996,427 - - $1,996,427
Electrical - $447,716 $142,618 $1,900 - $592,234
Plumbing $270,219 - $311,932 $27,954 - $610,106
Fire & Life Safety $90,134 $66,443 - - - $156,577
Technology - $49,308 $406,816 - - $456,124
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $42,894 $69,049 - $111,943
Other $84,861 $220,391 - - $37,886 $343,138
Total $445,215 $1,390,469 $3,167,000 $436,817 $37,886 $5,477,387
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

108
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Brooke ES
Page 53
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

109 Brown Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)

505 W. Anderson Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 1957 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 53,853 9,216 63,069
Area (GSF) per student 104 18 122
Number of Classrooms 29 12 41
Permanent Capacity 468
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 519
Utilization (by enrollment) 111% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 525 -58
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 546 -79 Perm Buildings 53,853 33.6%
2010-11 In Migration 074 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 096 Building A 1 1957 53,853 36.2%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.1
Parking Spaces 58

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $26,737 $40,134 - $66,871 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,785,837*
Roofing $1,852,585 - $20,585 - - $1,873,170
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $113,675 - - $113,675
Interior - $128,130 $56,332 $523,139 - $707,601
Mechanical - $782,729 $387,333 - - $1,170,062
Electrical - $200,491 $98,504 $32,990 - $331,985
Plumbing $433,368 - $679,370 $5,350 - $1,118,089
Fire & Life Safety $106,953 $62,707 - - - $169,660
Technology - $48,342 $393,777 - - $442,119
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $78,323 $65,369 - $143,692
Other $85,828 $84,704 - - $2,665,997 $2,836,529
Total $2,478,734 $1,307,103 $1,854,637 $666,982 $2,665,997 $8,973,453
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

109
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Brown ES
Page 54
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

110 Bryker Woods Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)

3309 Kerbey Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78703 1939 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 37,517 7,680 45,197
Area (GSF) per student 93 19 112
Number of Classrooms 16 10 26
Permanent Capacity 272
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 404
Utilization (by enrollment) 149% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 312 -40
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 115%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 333 -61 Perm Buildings 37,517 34.2%
2010-11 In Migration 094 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 047 Building A 1 1939 30,990 39.0%
Building B 1 1999 4,874 10.2%
Site Data Multi-Use 1 1949 451 13.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.3 Multi-Use 1 1949 1,202
Parking Spaces 33

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $11,503 $2,135 - $64,475 - $78,114 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,629,010*
Roofing - - $49,869 - - $49,869
Structural - - $585 - - $585
Exterior - $3,842 $594,025 - - $597,867
Interior - $85,420 $187,324 $86,382 - $359,126
Mechanical - $671,437 $737,812 - - $1,409,249
Electrical $5,774 $258,851 $193,752 $8,554 - $466,931
Plumbing - - $550,203 $117,216 - $667,420
Fire & Life Safety $76,664 $56,369 - - - $133,033
Technology - $41,472 $228,241 - - $269,714
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $72,714 $71,979 - $144,693
Other $95,470 $320,072 - - $44,654 $460,196
Total $189,411 $1,439,598 $2,614,525 $348,606 $44,654 $4,636,795
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

110
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bryker Woods ES
Page 55
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

111 Campbell Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

2613 Rogers Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78722 1992 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,793 1,536 63,329
Area (GSF) per student 172 4 176
Number of Classrooms 33 2 35
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 360
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 367 157
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 70%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 379 145 Perm Buildings 61,793 20.8%
2010-11 In Migration 056 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 063 Building A 1 1992 61,793 19.2%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.7
Parking Spaces 71

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $2,209 - $194,564 $19,758 - $216,531 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,067,999*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $3,668 - - $3,668
Exterior - - $1,436 - - $1,436
Interior - $21,355 $141,699 $44,826 - $207,880
Mechanical - $159,506 $1,609,266 - - $1,768,771
Electrical - $79,714 $22,047 $21,308 - $123,068
Plumbing - $5,673 $102,748 $8,562 - $116,982
Fire & Life Safety $102,685 $61,978 $2,617 - - $167,280
Technology - $51,473 $480,195 - - $531,667
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $93,514 $102,707 - $196,221
Other $206,699 $376,708 - - $377,355 $960,762
Total $311,592 $756,406 $2,651,752 $197,160 $377,355 $4,294,266
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

111
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Campbell ES
Page 56
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

173 Casey Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

9400 Texas Oaks Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1998 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,506 1,536 83,042
Area (GSF) per student 122 2 124
Number of Classrooms 44 2 46
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 669
Utilization (by enrollment) 94% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 763 -52
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 107%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 768 -57 Perm Buildings 81,506 15.8%
2010-11 In Migration 083 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 171 Building A 1 1998 81,506 15.1%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.9
Parking Spaces 90

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $11,274 - - $11,274 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $743,407*
Roofing - - - $1,609,070 - $1,609,070
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - $21,355 $103,475 $259,333 - $384,163
Mechanical - $9,454 $175,204 - - $184,658
Electrical - $55,790 $69,561 $20,517 - $145,867
Plumbing - - $60,629 $9,631 - $70,260
Fire & Life Safety $118,356 $70,205 $2,617 - - $191,179
Technology - $61,817 $571,009 - - $632,826
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $94,992 $168,573 - $263,566
Other $214,476 $191,954 - - $78,748 $485,178
Total $332,832 $410,575 $1,088,761 $2,067,124 $78,748 $3,978,039
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

173
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Casey ES
Page 57
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

112 Casis Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

2710 Exposition Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78703 1951 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 77,911 13,824 91,735
Area (GSF) per student 94 17 111
Number of Classrooms 38 16 54
Permanent Capacity 669
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 825
Utilization (by enrollment) 123% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 731 -62
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 109%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 764 -95 Perm Buildings 77,911 17.4%
2010-11 In Migration 110 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 016 Building A 1 1951 77,710 16.6%
Storage 1 1977 201
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.2
Parking Spaces 74

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $110,394 $128,950 - $239,343 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $911,712*
Roofing - $23,829 - - - $23,829
Structural $3,372 - - - - $3,372
Exterior - - $125,554 - - $125,554
Interior - $158,014 $91,098 $192,609 - $441,722
Mechanical $1,143 $225,633 $311,862 - - $538,638
Electrical $1,398 $139,476 $502,223 $285,421 - $928,518
Plumbing - - $883,640 $7,492 - $891,131
Fire & Life Safety $52,902 $47,234 - - - $100,136
Technology - $37,504 $553,409 - - $590,913
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $280,357 $117,401 - $397,758
Other $221,207 - - - $298,311 $519,518
Total $280,022 $631,690 $2,858,536 $731,873 $298,311 $4,800,432
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

112
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Casis ES
Page 58
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

184 Clayton Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)

7525 La Crosse Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78739 2006 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 99,921 6,144 106,065
Area (GSF) per student 115 7 122
Number of Classrooms 47 8 55
Permanent Capacity 836
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 867
Utilization (by enrollment) 104% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 837 -1
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 100%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 905 -69 Perm Buildings 99,921 5.9%
2010-11 In Migration 087 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 048 Building A 1 2006 99,921 5.6%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 16.8
Parking Spaces 80

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $104,860 - - $104,860 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $518,872*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - - $110,324 $11,953 - $122,276
Mechanical - $94,332 - - - $94,332
Electrical - $55,790 $15,442 $18,970 - $90,203
Plumbing - - $40,274 $30,096 - $70,370
Fire & Life Safety $136,427 $66,371 - - - $202,798
Technology - $66,669 $727,735 - - $794,404
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $144,232 $154,373 - $298,605
Other - - - - - $0
Total $136,427 $382,446 $1,142,866 $215,392 $0 $1,877,130
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

184
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Clayton ES
Page 59
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

161 Cook Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)

1511 Cripple Creek Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78758 1974 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 67,344 18,432 85,776
Area (GSF) per student 75 20 95
Number of Classrooms 35 23 58
Permanent Capacity 561
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 901
Utilization (by enrollment) 161% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,252 -691
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 223%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,388 -827 Perm Buildings 67,344 27.3%
2010-11 In Migration 036 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 379 Building A 1 1974 58,243 34.4%
Building B 1 1998 9,101 6.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.7
Parking Spaces 102

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $5,447 $368,828 $71,282 $99,999 - $545,557 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,043,986*
Roofing - $23,862 - - - $23,862
Structural - $27,464 $124,896 - - $152,360
Exterior - $5,057 $13,275 - - $18,332
Interior - $22,516 $292,679 $56,423 - $371,617
Mechanical $113,579 $2,346,429 $305,774 - - $2,765,782
Electrical $612 $112,040 $498,713 $41,308 - $652,673
Plumbing $463,806 $7,984 $672,803 $17,116 - $1,161,710
Fire & Life Safety $139,760 $77,796 - - - $217,556
Technology - $52,591 $514,759 - - $567,349
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $164,394 $60,771 - $225,164
Other $104,525 $171,689 - - $3,122,125 $3,398,340
Total $827,731 $3,216,256 $2,658,575 $275,616 $3,122,125 $10,100,303
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

161
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Cook ES
Page 60
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

183 Cowan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

2817 Kentish Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1999 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 70,234 9,216 79,450
Area (GSF) per student 90 12 101
Number of Classrooms 37 12 49
Permanent Capacity 669
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 783
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 707 -38
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 106%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 704 -35 Perm Buildings 70,234 9.1%
2010-11 In Migration 196 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 121 Building A 1 1999 70,234 7.6%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 22.5
Parking Spaces 84

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $18,655 $75,046 - $98,307 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $773,651*
Roofing - - $54,863 - - $54,863
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - $770 - $770
Interior - $21,355 $194,940 $48,518 - $264,812
Mechanical - $76,432 - - - $76,432
Electrical - $5,580 $32,214 $45,189 - $82,983
Plumbing - - $136,947 $23,607 - $160,554
Fire & Life Safety $122,086 $71,547 - - - $193,633
Technology - $53,321 $543,971 - - $597,292
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $129,283 $76,537 - $205,820
Other $318,918 $50,165 - - $287,289 $656,372
Total $441,004 $332,647 $1,110,874 $269,668 $287,289 $2,441,481
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

183
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Cowan ES
Page 61
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

113 Cunningham Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

2200 Berkeley Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1963 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 71,600 6,144 77,744
Area (GSF) per student 140 12 152
Number of Classrooms 35 7 42
Permanent Capacity 627
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 512
Utilization (by enrollment) 82% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 573 54
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 91%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 560 67 Perm Buildings 71,600 39.4%
2010-11 In Migration 116 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 174 Building A 1 1963 61,878 38.7%
Building B 1 1990 9,722 30.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.8
Parking Spaces 62

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $725,547 $272,621 - $998,169 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $771,359*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - $1,685 - - - $1,685
Exterior $483 - $26,308 - - $26,791
Interior - $2,068 $207,688 $46,250 - $256,006
Mechanical - $74,272 $2,949,674 - - $3,023,946
Electrical - - $1,233,513 $39,131 - $1,272,644
Plumbing - $1,894 $2,102,907 $24,603 - $2,129,403
Fire & Life Safety $118,092 $70,131 - - - $188,222
Technology - $53,939 $547,184 - - $601,123
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $111,536 $92,651 - $204,187
Other $56,081 $392,715 - - $3,523,663 $3,972,459
Total $174,656 $596,703 $7,904,357 $475,256 $3,523,663 $12,674,635
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

113
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Cunningham ES
Page 62
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

179 Davis Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

5214 Duval Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78727 1993 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 72,149 4,608 76,757
Area (GSF) per student 106 7 112
Number of Classrooms 41 6 47
Permanent Capacity 732
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 683
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 666 66
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 91%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 702 30 Perm Buildings 72,149 24.7%
2010-11 In Migration 047 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 035 Building A 1 1993 62,168 28.3%
Building B 1 1999 9,981 4.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Parking Spaces 104

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $1,852 $40,134 - $41,985 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,151,312*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $3,372 - - $3,372
Exterior - - $6,076 - - $6,076
Interior $1,219 $21,355 $1,236,077 $53,085 - $1,311,737
Mechanical - $9,454 $1,886,653 - - $1,896,106
Electrical - $44,631 $182,421 $45,586 - $272,638
Plumbing - - $135,957 $20,398 - $156,355
Fire & Life Safety $107,138 $67,067 $2,617 - - $176,823
Technology - $53,631 $545,092 - - $598,723
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $163,945 $155,828 - $319,772
Other $267,589 $529,587 - - $172,691 $969,866
Total $375,946 $775,366 $4,164,062 $315,031 $172,691 $5,803,095
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

179
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Davis ES
Page 63
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

114 Dawson Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

3001 South 1st Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1954 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 55,301 5,394 60,695
Area (GSF) per student 167 16 183
Number of Classrooms 32 3 35
Permanent Capacity 505
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 331
Utilization (by enrollment) 66% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 276 229
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 55%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 282 223 Perm Buildings 55,301 27.0%
2010-11 In Migration 113 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 059 Building A 1 1954 45,037 26.3%
Building B 1 1986 299 3.3%
Site Data Building C 1 1991 9,965 10.0%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.7
Parking Spaces 56

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $208,739 $42,588 - - $251,327 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,999,340*
Roofing - $1,297 $32,523 - - $33,821
Structural - - $27,004 - - $27,004
Exterior - - $58,409 - - $58,409
Interior $23,515 $85,420 $121,022 $10,149 - $240,106
Mechanical - $820,238 $195,656 - - $1,015,894
Electrical - $535,848 $131,343 $15,763 - $682,954
Plumbing - - $321,199 $6,420 - $327,619
Fire & Life Safety $82,474 $63,151 - - - $145,625
Technology - $46,000 $474,418 - - $520,418
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $342,862 $91,722 - $434,584
Other $714,876 $417,782 - - $1,240,330 $2,372,988
Total $820,865 $2,178,475 $1,747,025 $124,053 $1,240,330 $6,110,749
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

114
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Dawson ES
Page 64
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

154 Doss Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

7005 Northledge Dr Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78731 1970 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 60,228 12,288 72,516
Area (GSF) per student 78 16 94
Number of Classrooms 30 16 46
Permanent Capacity 543
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 768
Utilization (by enrollment) 141% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 728 -185
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 134%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 747 -204 Perm Buildings 60,228 32.7%
2010-11 In Migration 071 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 024 Building A 1 1970 55,582 40.5%
Bldg B 1 2009 4,646 0.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.7
Parking Spaces 73

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $72,430 $40,134 - $117,170 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,465,962*
Roofing - - $409,920 - - $409,920
Structural - $5,493 $68,609 - - $74,102
Exterior - - $731 - - $731
Interior - - $532,670 $50,410 - $583,081
Mechanical $11,527 $1,855,059 $825,466 - - $2,692,052
Electrical - $93,707 $1,239,975 $30,101 - $1,363,783
Plumbing - $1,594 $555,353 $15,048 - $571,995
Fire & Life Safety $109,107 $67,795 - - - $176,901
Technology - $49,792 $441,586 - - $491,378
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $180,004 $126,691 - $306,695
Other $168,386 $49,256 - - $522,873 $740,515
Total $289,020 $2,176,942 $4,326,744 $262,383 $522,873 $7,577,962
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

154
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Doss ES
Page 65
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

176 Galindo Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

3800 S. 2nd St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1989 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 85,482 7,680 93,162
Area (GSF) per student 121 11 132
Number of Classrooms 44 10 54
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 704
Utilization (by enrollment) 99% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 689 22
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 97%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 705 6 Perm Buildings 85,482 11.4%
2010-11 In Migration 103 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 091 Building A 1 1989 84,582 9.3%
Mechanical 1 2001 900 85.1%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.8
Parking Spaces 98

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,218 $5,085 - - $9,303 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,336,056*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $3,160 - - $3,160
Interior - $87,858 $143,409 $46,940 - $278,208
Mechanical $227,913 $23,049 $210,340 - - $461,302
Electrical $551 $62,382 $47,347 $1,821 - $112,101
Plumbing - - $70,598 $40,861 - $111,459
Fire & Life Safety $136,237 $76,517 - - - $212,754
Technology - $69,224 $647,749 - - $716,973
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Specialties - - $182,951 $148,333 - $331,284
Other $353,824 $145,359 - - $427,229 $926,412
Total $718,525 $617,531 $1,310,639 $237,955 $427,229 $3,311,879
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

176
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Galindo ES
Page 66
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

116 Govalle Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

3601 Govalle Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1940 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 77,638 77,638
Area (GSF) per student 187 0 187
Number of Classrooms 37 0 37
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 415
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 452 146
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 76%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 509 89 Perm Buildings 77,638 36.1%
2010-11 In Migration 052 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 104 Building A 1 1940 77,137 34.8%
Building B 1 1940 501 3.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.4
Parking Spaces 71

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $45,725 - - $50,331 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,760,800*
Roofing - - $38,291 - - $38,291
Structural - $5,080 $9,873 - - $14,952
Exterior - $18,207 $1,168,634 - - $1,186,841
Interior - $13,048 $108,769 $734,337 - $856,155
Mechanical - $1,834,541 $609,751 - - $2,444,292
Electrical - - $318,491 $26,336 - $344,828
Plumbing - $29,063 $1,297,172 $8,562 - $1,334,796
Fire & Life Safety $116,822 $67,936 - - - $184,758
Technology - $67,933 $536,415 - - $604,348
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $164,526 $500,659 - $665,185
Other $223,311 $380,254 - - $3,581,856 $4,185,421
Total $340,133 $2,420,667 $4,297,646 $1,269,894 $3,581,856 $11,910,197
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

116
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Govalle ES
Page 67
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

159 Graham Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

11211 Tom Adams Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78753 1972 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 70,589 10,752 81,341
Area (GSF) per student 93 14 107
Number of Classrooms 38 11 49
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 761
Utilization (by enrollment) 127% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 825 -227
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 138%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 850 -252 Perm Buildings 70,589 29.7%
2010-11 In Migration 049 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 114 Building A 1 1972 44,946 41.0%
Building B 1 1993 14,411 13.6%
Site Data Building C 1 2008 11,232 4.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Parking Spaces 77

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $1,180 $91,328 $221,921 $86,383 - $400,812 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,851,892*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - $16,429 $70,378 $296 - $87,103
Exterior - $1,716 $3,157 - - $4,874
Interior - $44,191 $177,156 $252,277 - $473,624
Mechanical - $3,511,777 $245,364 - - $3,757,141
Electrical - - $262,635 $15,208 - $277,843
Plumbing $337,809 $771 $252,984 $9,631 - $601,195
Fire & Life Safety $127,799 $73,588 $2,617 - - $204,004
Technology - $53,595 $561,452 - - $615,048
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - $2,119 $83,054 $99,068 - $184,241
Other $309,592 $279,998 - - $145,540 $735,129
Total $776,380 $4,075,512 $1,880,720 $462,863 $145,540 $7,341,015
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

159
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Graham ES
Page 68
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

117 Gullett Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)

6310 Treadwell Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1956 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 39,827 11,525 51,352
Area (GSF) per student 74 21 95
Number of Classrooms 24 14 38
Permanent Capacity 418
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 541
Utilization (by enrollment) 129% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 325 93
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 78%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 342 76 Perm Buildings 39,827 30.4%
2010-11 In Migration 247 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 030 Building A 1 1956 39,648 34.1%
Mechanical 1 1972 179 11.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.9
Parking Spaces 30

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $10,933 $96,959 $40,134 - $148,025 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $882,284*
Roofing - $7,113 $96,482 - - $103,595
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $292 $917 $58,897 - - $60,106
Interior - $51,419 $103,244 $45,619 - $200,283
Mechanical - $105,829 $1,056,360 - - $1,162,189
Electrical - $61,370 $774,757 $35,407 - $871,534
Plumbing - - $819,095 $36,511 - $855,606
Fire & Life Safety $88,849 $66,871 - - - $155,719
Technology - $46,009 $370,822 - - $416,831
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Specialties - - $107,868 $120,820 - $228,688
Other $207,430 $86,329 - - $3,818,868 $4,112,628
Total $296,571 $585,713 $3,484,484 $278,491 $3,818,868 $8,464,128
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

117
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Gullett ES
Page 69
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

118 Harris Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

1711 Wheless Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1955 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 56,066 10,752 66,818
Area (GSF) per student 74 14 88
Number of Classrooms 34 10 44
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 758
Utilization (by enrollment) 140% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 755 -213
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 139%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 789 -247 Perm Buildings 56,066 23.9%
2010-11 In Migration 052 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 106 Building A 1 1955 41,954 31.4%
Building B 1 1998 14,112 10.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.3
Parking Spaces 33

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $2,967 $174,752 - $177,718 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $713,463*
Roofing - $204,977 $16,363 - - $221,340
Structural - $2,401 - - - $2,401
Exterior - $2,099 $400,297 - - $402,396
Interior - $5,402 $129,986 $8,601 - $143,989
Mechanical - $93,054 $1,264,887 - - $1,357,940
Electrical - $5,580 $613,234 $44,635 - $663,448
Plumbing - - $564,904 $29,950 - $594,855
Fire & Life Safety $97,111 $80,372 - - - $177,483
Technology - $47,049 $509,762 - - $556,811
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $174,963 $93,228 - $268,190
Other $55,187 $120,231 - - $26,321 $201,740
Total $152,298 $561,165 $3,677,362 $351,166 $26,321 $4,768,312
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

118
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Harris ES
Page 70
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

163 Hart Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

8301 Furness Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78753 1998 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,042 13,824 94,866
Area (GSF) per student 90 15 106
Number of Classrooms 44 18 62
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 898
Utilization (by enrollment) 126% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 888 -177
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 125%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 982 -271 Perm Buildings 81,042 10.3%
2010-11 In Migration 101 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 088 Building A 1 1998 69,867 11.8%
Building B 1 2010 11,175 3.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.7
Parking Spaces 62

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $85,478 - $37,799 $29,425 - $152,702 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,091,219*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural $824 $3,296 $1,169 - - $5,289
Exterior $2,221 $388 $202 - - $2,811
Interior $15,616 $27,849 $53,674 $41,169 - $138,308
Mechanical - $60,697 $1,143 - - $61,840
Electrical - $126,867 $541,461 $50,734 - $719,063
Plumbing - - $53,823 $20,398 - $74,221
Fire & Life Safety $143,408 $84,854 - - - $228,262
Technology - $67,824 $659,673 - - $727,497
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $125,968 $188,811 - $314,779
Other $191,807 $230,451 - - $150,402 $572,660
Total $439,353 $651,866 $1,474,912 $330,538 $150,402 $3,047,071
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

163
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Hart ES
Page 71
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

119 Highland Park Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)

4900 Fairview Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78731 1952 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 58,550 9,216 67,766
Area (GSF) per student 88 14 102
Number of Classrooms 33 12 45
Permanent Capacity 585
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 662
Utilization (by enrollment) 113% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 599 -14
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 648 -63 Perm Buildings 58,550 41.4%
2010-11 In Migration 116 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 054 Building A 1 1952 58,550 43.5%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.3
Parking Spaces 60

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $232,569 $40,134 - $272,703 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,225,235*
Roofing - $21,733 $902,460 - - $924,193
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $85,237 $1,319,390 - $1,404,627
Interior - $64,699 $187,358 $57,497 - $309,553
Mechanical $295,084 $108,099 $2,038,859 - - $2,442,043
Electrical - $259,407 $390,430 $36,116 - $685,953
Plumbing - - $1,052,700 $3,209 - $1,055,909
Fire & Life Safety $106,474 $66,857 - - - $173,331
Technology - $50,681 $518,880 - - $569,560
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties $4,193 - $170,611 $82,273 - $257,077
Other $102,408 $145,599 - - $2,241,968 $2,489,976
Total $508,160 $717,075 $5,579,104 $1,538,618 $2,241,968 $10,584,925
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

119
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Highland Park ES
Page 72
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

155 Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

8601 Tallwood Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78759 1970 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,626 9,216 78,842
Area (GSF) per student 95 13 108
Number of Classrooms 35 11 46
Permanent Capacity 627
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 732
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 714 -87
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 114%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 734 -107 Perm Buildings 69,626 29.0%
2010-11 In Migration 072 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 050 Building A 1 1970 62,010 32.7%
Building B 1 1990 7,616 16.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.9
Parking Spaces 74

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $13,491 $40,134 - $53,624 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,011,507*
Roofing - - $1,750,257 - - $1,750,257
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $2,925 $10,485 - $13,409
Interior - $128,130 $124,942 $47,029 - $300,102
Mechanical - $1,180,297 $795,288 - - $1,975,585
Electrical - - $417,152 $69,270 - $486,422
Plumbing $89,040 - $769,391 $10,698 - $869,130
Fire & Life Safety $122,357 $83,228 - - - $205,584
Technology - $53,374 $544,165 - - $597,539
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $53,658 $147,077 - $200,735
Other $159,986 $195,096 - - $2,573,608 $2,928,690
Total $371,383 $1,640,124 $4,471,269 $324,693 $2,573,608 $9,381,077
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

155
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Hill ES
Page 73
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

162 Houston Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

5409 Ponciana Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1976 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,360 15,360 96,720
Area (GSF) per student 89 17 105
Number of Classrooms 43 19 62
Permanent Capacity 692
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 917
Utilization (by enrollment) 133% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 897 -205
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 872 -180 Perm Buildings 81,360 36.0%
2010-11 In Migration 128 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 102 Building A 1 1976 55,814 50.4%
Building B 1 1991 8,863 29.4%
Site Data Building C 1 1991 5,303 24.2%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.8 Building D 1 2006 11,380 10.1%
Parking Spaces 93

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $5,847 $9,453 $40,134 - $55,433 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,766,794*
Roofing - - $794,286 - - $794,286
Structural - - $8,788 - - $8,788
Exterior - - $3,658 $8,855 - $12,514
Interior - $54,696 $540,035 $62,669 - $657,401
Mechanical $36,988 $4,421,996 $1,127,316 - - $5,586,300
Electrical - $301,828 $224,073 $61,942 - $587,843
Plumbing - - $680,338 $49,351 - $729,689
Fire & Life Safety $147,480 $80,500 - - - $227,980
Technology - $63,918 $692,577 - - $756,494
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $205,773 $90,990 - $296,763
Other $163,516 $390,742 - - $251,318 $805,576
Total $347,984 $5,418,810 $4,286,298 $313,940 $251,318 $10,618,350
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

162
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Houston ES
Page 74
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

178 Jordan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

6711 Johnny Morris Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78724 1992 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 74,460 12,288 86,748
Area (GSF) per student 89 15 104
Number of Classrooms 41 16 57
Permanent Capacity 655
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 833
Utilization (by enrollment) 127% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 706 -52
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 108%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 707 -53 Perm Buildings 74,460 22.0%
2010-11 In Migration 200 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 075 Building A 1 1992 62,255 25.4%
Building B 1 2008 12,205 4.5%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.5
Parking Spaces 114

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $5,980 $153,950 $40,134 - $200,064 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,308,122*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $6,370 - - $6,370
Exterior - - $32,022 - - $32,022
Interior - $21,355 $249,074 $55,637 - $326,066
Mechanical $16,073 $33,156 $2,256,940 - - $2,306,169
Electrical - $156,212 $406,010 $49,071 - $611,292
Plumbing - $79,525 $161,718 $30,096 - $271,339
Fire & Life Safety $118,309 $76,247 - - - $194,556
Technology - $54,550 $646,026 - - $700,576
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $144,437 $130,980 - $275,417
Other $209,863 $437,570 - - $366,415 $1,013,847
Total $344,244 $963,877 $4,056,546 $305,917 $366,415 $6,037,001
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

178
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Jordan ES
Page 75
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

120 Joslin Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

4500 Manchaca Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1954 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 44,826 7,680 52,506
Area (GSF) per student 123 21 145
Number of Classrooms 24 9 33
Permanent Capacity 374
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 363
Utilization (by enrollment) 97% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 329 45
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 88%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 345 29 Perm Buildings 44,826 44.1%
2010-11 In Migration 089 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 056 Building A 1 1954 30,934 56.5%
Building B 1 1957 10,642 39.6%
Site Data Building C 1 1986 3,250 4.6%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.1
Parking Spaces 56

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $165,935 $4,802 - - $170,737 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,320,031*
Roofing - $535,503 $193,838 - - $729,341
Structural - $6,269 $1,537 - - $7,806
Exterior - - $1,232,954 - - $1,232,954
Interior - $106,775 $156,756 $238,803 - $502,335
Mechanical - $751,392 $909,349 $171,550 - $1,832,291
Electrical - $47,787 $613,768 $5,227 - $666,782
Plumbing $253,206 - $488,637 $14,976 - $756,819
Fire & Life Safety $88,812 $59,839 $2,617 - - $151,268
Technology - $47,435 $358,949 - - $406,384
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $91,288 $84,871 - $176,158
Other $15,415 $142,381 - - $1,576,163 $1,733,958
Total $357,433 $1,962,599 $4,054,494 $515,428 $1,576,163 $8,466,116
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

120
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Joslin ES
Page 76
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

180 Kiker Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)

5913 La Crosse Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78739 1992 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 76,332 15,360 91,692
Area (GSF) per student 82 16 98
Number of Classrooms 42 13 55
Permanent Capacity 752
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 933
Utilization (by enrollment) 124% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 883 -131
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 117%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 852 -100 Perm Buildings 76,332 16.3%
2010-11 In Migration 129 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 080 Building A 1 1992 63,549 19.6%
Building B 1 2007 12,783 4.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.4
Parking Spaces 90

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $10,449 $87,037 - $97,485 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,328,993*
Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585
Structural - $3,302 - - - $3,302
Exterior $62,649 - $590 - - $63,239
Interior - $128,130 $343,012 $41,886 - $513,028
Mechanical - - $1,460,014 - - $1,460,014
Electrical - - $9,906 $29,467 - $39,374
Plumbing - - $200,216 $11,770 - $211,986
Fire & Life Safety $126,090 $78,994 - - - $205,083
Technology - $54,681 $646,497 - - $701,179
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $215,347 $61,320 - $276,667
Other $276,715 $577,848 - - $270,058 $1,124,621
Total $465,453 $863,540 $2,886,032 $231,480 $270,058 $4,716,563
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

180
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Kiker ES
Page 77
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

172 Kocurek Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

9800 Curlew Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1986 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,528 1,536 80,064
Area (GSF) per student 119 2 121
Number of Classrooms 42 2 44
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 660
Utilization (by enrollment) 98% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 687 -14
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 698 -25 Perm Buildings 78,528 25.4%
2010-11 In Migration 106 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 131 Building A 1 1986 68,029 26.7%
Building B 1 1998 10,499 7.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.3
Parking Spaces 70

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $20,597 $118,823 $73,933 - $213,354 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,336,115*
Roofing - $7,927 - - - $7,927
Structural - - $3,472 $22,830 - $26,303
Exterior - $258 $21,688 $7,965 - $29,911
Interior - - $121,380 $45,109 - $166,489
Mechanical - $264,419 $3,016,136 - - $3,280,555
Electrical - $160,129 $85,511 $20,237 - $265,877
Plumbing - - $170,382 $36,585 - $206,967
Fire & Life Safety $112,894 $69,086 - - - $181,980
Technology - $67,872 $659,846 - - $727,718
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Specialties - - $170,132 $130,463 - $300,595
Other $163,863 $320,146 - - $84,409 $568,417
Total $276,757 $1,059,358 $4,367,370 $337,123 $84,409 $6,125,017
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

172
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Kocurek ES
Page 78
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

168 Langford Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

2206 Blue Meadow Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1980 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,250 16,896 95,146
Area (GSF) per student 94 20 114
Number of Classrooms 43 21 64
Permanent Capacity 692
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 834
Utilization (by enrollment) 121% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 895 -203
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 129%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 946 -254 Perm Buildings 78,250 33.5%
2010-11 In Migration 054 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 103 Building A 1 1980 57,666 48.2%
Building B 1 1996 8,753 15.8%
Site Data Building C 1 2010 11,831 3.5%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 83

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $45,535 $75,331 $42,669 - $163,535 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $6,584,931*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $2,170 - - $2,170
Exterior - $79,485 $202 - - $79,688
Interior - $24,894 $436,963 $45,997 - $507,854
Mechanical $23,055 $5,212,923 $470,507 - - $5,706,485
Electrical - $274,142 $345,120 $52,952 - $672,214
Plumbing $194,476 - $466,878 $30,024 - $691,378
Fire & Life Safety $148,475 $81,228 - - - $229,703
Technology - $55,232 $651,423 - - $706,655
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $158,946 $120,358 - $279,303
Other $156,258 $239,586 - - $292,964 $688,809
Total $522,264 $6,062,668 $2,607,540 $292,001 $292,964 $9,777,436
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

168
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Langford ES
Page 79
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

121 Lee Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)

3308 Hampton Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78705 1939 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 46,265 768 47,033
Area (GSF) per student 108 2 110
Number of Classrooms 24 1 25
Permanent Capacity 418
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 428
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 308 110
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 74%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 325 93 Perm Buildings 46,265 40.7%
2010-11 In Migration 109 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 025 Building A 1 1939 38,816 41.5%
Mechanical 1 1939 460 12.8%
Site Data Library 1 1998 5,679 7.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 4.8 Building D 1 1939 1,310 22.5%
Parking Spaces 35

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $6,267 $69,158 - - $75,426 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,275,348*
Roofing - $69,180 $7,013 - - $76,193
Structural - $32,808 - - - $32,808
Exterior - $137,099 $17,506 - - $154,605
Interior - $3,267 $289,684 $48,675 - $341,626
Mechanical - $792,855 $976,847 - - $1,769,702
Electrical - $145,055 $437,497 $24,197 - $606,750
Plumbing - $38,562 $951,773 $25,675 - $1,016,010
Fire & Life Safety $73,630 $55,635 - - - $129,265
Technology - $47,901 $407,694 - - $455,595
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - $227,364 $67,925 $101,699 - $396,988
Other $353,154 $292,571 - - $36,675 $682,400
Total $426,784 $1,848,564 $3,225,098 $200,247 $36,675 $5,737,368
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

121
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lee ES
Page 80
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

160 Linder Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

2800 Metcalfe Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78741 1972 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,250 16,896 86,146
Area (GSF) per student 78 19 97
Number of Classrooms 34 22 56
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 892
Utilization (by enrollment) 164% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 956 -414
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 176%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,031 -489 Perm Buildings 69,250 19.7%
2010-11 In Migration 062 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 132 Building A 1 1972 69,250 22.0%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.1
Parking Spaces 86

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $194,146 $40,134 - $234,280 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,761,854*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $48,399 - - $48,399
Exterior - - $397 - - $397
Interior - $85,420 $186,968 $156,894 - $429,282
Mechanical - $1,145,115 $1,370,191 - - $2,515,306
Electrical - $87,923 $75,235 $27,921 - $191,079
Plumbing - - $282,747 $7,489 - $290,237
Fire & Life Safety $138,680 $77,410 - - - $216,090
Technology - $53,083 $517,073 - - $570,155
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $240,305 $141,453 - $381,758
Other $32,036 $142,186 - - $5,522,354 $5,696,576
Total $170,717 $1,591,137 $2,915,462 $373,892 $5,522,354 $10,573,560
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

160
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Linder ES
Page 81
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

122 Maplewood Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)

3808 Maplewood Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78722 1951 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 45,390 9,216 54,606
Area (GSF) per student 112 23 134
Number of Classrooms 20 12 32
Permanent Capacity 355
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 406
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 300 55
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 84%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 383 -28 Perm Buildings 45,390 36.5%
2010-11 In Migration 129 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 069 Building A 1 1951 44,818 37.8%
Storage 1 1952 572 5.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.4
Parking Spaces 42

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $8,593 $509,397 - - $517,990 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,052,714*
Roofing - $101,303 - - - $101,303
Structural - - $2,844 - - $2,844
Exterior - - $98,285 - - $98,285
Interior - $67,415 $297,758 $65,761 - $430,934
Mechanical - - $1,765,702 - - $1,765,702
Electrical - $145,055 $286,640 $9,109 - $440,803
Plumbing $1,223,858 - $351,787 $6,422 - $1,582,067
Fire & Life Safety $76,274 $61,452 - - - $137,727
Technology - $43,627 $285,586 - - $329,213
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $136,924 $67,809 - $204,733
Other $121,573 $203,563 - - $1,440,006 $1,765,142
Total $1,421,706 $631,008 $3,734,924 $149,102 $1,440,006 $7,376,745
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

122
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Maplewood ES
Page 82
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

123 Mathews Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)

906 West Lynn St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78703 1916 EX Yes

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 42,112 3,070 45,182
Area (GSF) per student 104 8 112
Number of Classrooms 23 4 27
Permanent Capacity 397
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 405
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 284 113
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 72%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 297 100 Perm Buildings 42,112 31.8%
2010-11 In Migration 106 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 031 Building A 1 1916 41,573 32.0%
Building B 1 1948 391
Site Data Building C 1 1965 48
Gross Site Area (Acres) 2.3 Building D 1 1996 100 3.4%
Parking Spaces 0

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $69,246 - - $69,246 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,635,339*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - $8,430 - - - $8,430
Exterior - - $12,088 $113,496 - $125,584
Interior - $109,029 $96,250 $34,351 - $239,630
Mechanical $6,971 $977,180 $687,427 $15,202 - $1,686,780
Electrical - $199,892 $141,617 $25,227 - $366,737
Plumbing - $4,991 $891,961 $6,420 - $903,372
Fire & Life Safety $55,849 $54,246 - - - $110,095
Technology - $52,122 $337,778 - - $389,900
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $118,107 $91,283 - $209,390
Other $41,079 $125,550 - - $2,232,330 $2,398,958
Total $103,898 $1,531,441 $2,354,476 $285,980 $2,232,330 $6,508,124
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

123
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Mathews ES
Page 83
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

165 McBee Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)

1001 West Braker Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78758 1999 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,717 9,216 78,933
Area (GSF) per student 91 12 103
Number of Classrooms 36 12 48
Permanent Capacity 580
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 765
Utilization (by enrollment) 132% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,031 -451
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 178%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,083 -503 Perm Buildings 69,717 7.9%
2010-11 In Migration 030 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 301 Building A 1 1999 69,717 7.3%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.9
Parking Spaces 90

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $54,404 $1,308 $1,112 - - $56,824 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $652,308*
Roofing - - $4,268 - - $4,268
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $1,716 - - $1,716
Interior - $89,744 $84,538 $124,613 - $298,894
Mechanical - $21,645 $29,969 - - $51,614
Electrical - $81,656 $30,695 $45,032 - $157,383
Plumbing - - $37,720 $9,631 - $47,351
Fire & Life Safety $117,796 $75,825 - - - $193,621
Technology - $49,166 $577,456 - - $626,622
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $167,598 $62,784 - $230,382
Other $60,968 $99,797 - - $57,384 $218,148
Total $233,168 $419,140 $935,073 $242,060 $57,384 $1,886,824
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

165
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
McBee ES
Page 84
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

147 Menchaca Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

12120 Manchaca Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1975 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 59,978 10,752 70,730
Area (GSF) per student 87 16 103
Number of Classrooms 34 12 46
Permanent Capacity 606
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 686
Utilization (by enrollment) 113% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 685 -79
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 629 -23 Perm Buildings 59,978 36.3%
2010-11 In Migration 113 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 117 Building A 1 1975 59,978 40.1%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.8
Parking Spaces 83

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $42,176 $111,016 $73,933 - $227,126 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,656,934*
Roofing - $11,666 $25,768 - - $37,434
Structural - - $877 - - $877
Exterior - - $4,712 - - $4,712
Interior - $128,130 $255,635 $462,745 - $846,511
Mechanical - $3,757,829 $730,614 - - $4,488,442
Electrical - $88,453 $40,491 $50,379 - $179,322
Plumbing - - $560,898 $16,048 - $576,946
Fire & Life Safety $102,512 $41,970 - - - $144,482
Technology - $125,045 $455,240 - - $580,285
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $102,211 $90,546 - $192,757
Other $134,935 $224,219 - - $82,611 $441,764
Total $237,446 $4,419,488 $2,287,461 $693,652 $82,611 $7,720,657
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

147
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Menchaca ES
Page 85
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

124 Metz Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

84 Robert T. Martinez, Jr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1993 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,905 3,072 64,977
Area (GSF) per student 124 6 130
Number of Classrooms 34 4 38
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 498
Utilization (by enrollment) 92% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 477 65
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 88%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 509 33 Perm Buildings 61,905 29.5%
2010-11 In Migration 088 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 064 Building A 1 1993 61,905 29.1%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.4
Parking Spaces 45

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $1,481 $654 $14,812 $2,225 - $19,172 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,721,653*
Roofing - $1,488,646 $373 - - $1,489,018
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $2,221 - - - $2,221
Interior - $42,710 $68,003 $52,813 - $163,525
Mechanical - $138,412 $1,871,641 - - $2,010,054
Electrical - $211,049 $23,656 $21,704 - $256,409
Plumbing - - $108,586 $8,559 - $117,145
Fire & Life Safety $84,706 $64,395 $2,617 - - $151,718
Technology - $52,126 $513,620 - - $565,747
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $136,198 $154,598 - $290,796
Other $159,506 $475,748 - - $213,073 $848,327
Total $245,693 $2,475,960 $2,739,507 $239,898 $213,073 $5,914,131
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

124
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Metz ES
Page 86
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

181 Mills Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

6201 Davis Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 1998 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,368 12,288 93,656
Area (GSF) per student 88 13 101
Number of Classrooms 44 16 60
Permanent Capacity 794
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 928
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 831 -37
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 105%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 821 -27 Perm Buildings 81,368 12.6%
2010-11 In Migration 134 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 031 Building A 1 1998 81,368 12.7%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 104

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $4,271 $140,421 - $144,692 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $992,832*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $2,701 - - $2,701
Exterior - - $12,051 - - $12,051
Interior - $85,420 $216,415 $12,904 - $314,739
Mechanical - $30,001 $735,357 $202,621 - $967,978
Electrical $454 $129,501 $20,194 $26,219 - $176,368
Plumbing - - $99,786 $6,422 - $106,208
Fire & Life Safety $140,775 $78,130 - - - $218,905
Technology - $65,331 $691,892 - - $757,223
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $136,728 $216,156 - $352,884
Other $113,354 $300,224 - - $163,005 $576,583
Total $254,583 $738,249 $1,919,394 $604,743 $163,005 $3,679,974
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

181
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Mills ES
Page 87
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

150 Norman Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

4001 Tannehill Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78721 1970 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 58,519 1,536 60,055
Area (GSF) per student 176 5 180
Number of Classrooms 30 2 32
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 333
Utilization (by enrollment) 68% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 376 110
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 77%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 348 138 Perm Buildings 58,519 32.2%
2010-11 In Migration 024 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 073 Building A 1 1970 44,692 38.6%
Classroom 1 2007 13,827 4.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.2
Parking Spaces 74

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $87,439 $114,067 - $201,506 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,219,093*
Roofing - - $400,347 - - $400,347
Structural - $1,873 - - - $1,873
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - - $499,495 $43,010 - $542,505
Mechanical - $1,300,661 $1,169,207 - - $2,469,868
Electrical - $209,477 $378,944 $31,881 - $620,302
Plumbing $222,755 - $339,444 $8,562 - $570,761
Fire & Life Safety $87,986 $60,327 - - - $148,313
Technology - $46,535 $386,706 - - $433,241
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $47,268 $51,613 - $98,881
Other $163,681 $125,797 - - $1,520,636 $1,810,114
Total $474,423 $1,744,670 $3,308,851 $249,133 $1,520,636 $7,297,712
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

150
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Norman ES
Page 88
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

148 Oak Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

6101 Patton Ranch Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78735 1974 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 75,784 10,752 86,536
Area (GSF) per student 98 14 112
Number of Classrooms 43 14 57
Permanent Capacity 773
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 772
Utilization (by enrollment) 100% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 820 -47
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 106%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 918 -145 Perm Buildings 75,784 33.4%
2010-11 In Migration 057 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 117 Building A 1 1974 59,574 40.2%
Building B 1 1984 16,210 19.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.7
Parking Spaces 97

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $8,459 $125,036 $73,933 - $207,429 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,402,384*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $3,335 - - $3,335
Exterior - - $37,741 - - $37,741
Interior - $42,710 $1,072,114 $180,232 - $1,295,056
Mechanical - $2,369,967 $334,717 - - $2,704,684
Electrical - $11,159 $1,261,583 $50,338 - $1,323,079
Plumbing $167,045 - $1,114,606 $27,814 - $1,309,465
Fire & Life Safety $116,414 $75,574 - - - $191,988
Technology - $54,881 $640,716 - - $695,597
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $175,418 $85,095 - $260,513
Other $294,450 $261,725 - - $46,822 $602,998
Total $577,910 $2,824,475 $4,765,267 $417,412 $46,822 $8,631,886
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

148
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Oak Hill ES
Page 89
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

125 Oak Springs Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

3601 Webberville Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1958 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 47,102 6,144 53,246
Area (GSF) per student 172 22 194
Number of Classrooms 26 6 32
Permanent Capacity 411
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 274
Utilization (by enrollment) 67% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 293 118
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 330 81 Perm Buildings 47,102 26.5%
2010-11 In Migration 036 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 046 Building A 1 1958 43,131 26.5%
Building B 1 1984 3,971 14.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.6
Parking Spaces 47

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $128,812 - - $128,812 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,123,235*
Roofing - $12,365 $4,355 - - $16,719
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $160,769 - - $160,769
Interior - $85,420 $169,551 $75,624 - $330,596
Mechanical $129,699 $1,004,248 $497,533 - - $1,631,481
Electrical - $55,790 $361,078 $36,872 - $453,741
Plumbing - $248,158 $147,291 $18,257 - $413,706
Fire & Life Safety $86,125 $59,691 - - - $145,816
Technology - $29,465 $311,196 - - $340,661
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $72,897 $88,134 - $161,030
Other $220,372 $142,261 - - $30,328 $392,960
Total $436,196 $1,687,039 $1,853,482 $218,887 $30,328 $4,225,932
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

125
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Oak Springs ES
Page 90
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

156 Odom Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

1010 Turtle Creek Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1970 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,009 13,824 74,833
Area (GSF) per student 93 21 114
Number of Classrooms 34 14 48
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 658
Utilization (by enrollment) 121% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 706 -164
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 719 -177 Perm Buildings 61,009 19.2%
2010-11 In Migration 058 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 101 Building A 1 1970 61,009 20.4%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.6
Parking Spaces 72

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $47,393 $18,972 - - $66,364 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,101,047*
Roofing - - $41,171 - - $41,171
Structural - $5,518 - - - $5,518
Exterior - - $202 - - $202
Interior - $106,775 $158,078 $115,343 - $380,196
Mechanical - $89,478 $1,387,846 - - $1,477,324
Electrical - $214,246 $322,340 $23,526 - $560,111
Plumbing - - $742,105 $24,603 - $766,707
Fire & Life Safety $117,601 $44,656 $2,617 - - $164,874
Technology - $47,014 - - - $47,014
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $142,742 $140,859 - $283,601
Other $197,192 $231,175 - - $75,095 $503,462
Total $314,793 $786,254 $2,816,072 $304,331 $75,095 $4,296,545
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

156
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Odom ES
Page 91
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

126 Ortega Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

1135 Garland Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78721 1959 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 47,302 3,072 50,374
Area (GSF) per student 160 10 170
Number of Classrooms 24 1 25
Permanent Capacity 374
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 296
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 266 108
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 269 105 Perm Buildings 47,302 40.2%
2010-11 In Migration 053 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 023 Building A 1 1959 19,106 50.2%
Building B 1 1966 20,907 30.8%
Site Data Building C 1 1959 5,146 56.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.4 Administration 1 1968 2,143 5.3%
Parking Spaces 36

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $41,511 $18,303 - $59,814 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,198,889*
Roofing $981 $1,337,475 $25,714 - - $1,364,170
Structural - - $101,906 $3,845 - $105,751
Exterior - - $1,040 - - $1,040
Interior $317 $21,355 $71,244 $49,806 - $142,722
Mechanical $49,160 $898,122 $985,704 - - $1,932,985
Electrical - $123,275 $385,431 $33,545 - $542,250
Plumbing $241,411 - $546,555 $19,326 - $807,292
Fire & Life Safety $81,278 $57,173 - - - $138,451
Technology - $44,049 $361,196 - - $405,245
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $109,465 $73,315 - $182,779
Other $150,185 $144,467 - - $55,295 $349,948
Total $523,332 $2,675,557 $2,629,766 $198,140 $55,295 $6,082,090
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

126
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ortega ES
Page 92
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

189 Overton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

7201 Colony Loop Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78724 2007 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 91,163 12,288 103,451
Area (GSF) per student 136 18 155
Number of Classrooms 39 15 54
Permanent Capacity 617
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 668
Utilization (by enrollment) 108% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 948 -331
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 154%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 972 -355 Perm Buildings 91,163 4.8%
2010-11 In Migration 044 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 217 Building A 1 2007 91,163 3.9%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 70.4
Parking Spaces 175

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $5,287 $114,067 - $119,354 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $373,207*
Roofing - - $14,805 - - $14,805
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - $42,710 $94,741 $48,367 - $185,818
Mechanical - - - - - $0
Electrical - $55,790 $14,514 $11,169 - $81,473
Plumbing - - $67,857 $14,979 - $82,836
Fire & Life Safety $129,148 $43,854 - - - $173,002
Technology - $52,063 $572,427 - - $624,490
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $45,799 $96,956 - $142,756
Other - - - - - $0
Total $129,148 $244,058 $815,429 $285,538 $0 $1,474,175
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

189
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Overton ES
Page 93
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

171 Palm Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

7601 Dixie Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1987 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 79,082 3,072 82,154
Area (GSF) per student 130 5 136
Number of Classrooms 42 4 46
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 606
Utilization (by enrollment) 90% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 637 36
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 95%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 667 6 Perm Buildings 79,082 11.1%
2010-11 In Migration 050 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 081 Building A 1 1987 68,119 10.2%
Building B 1 2005 10,963 7.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Parking Spaces 90

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $18,391 $37,763 $40,134 - $96,287 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,061,621*
Roofing - $6,899 - - - $6,899
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $242 - $8,822 $38,694 - $47,758
Interior - $23,156 $115,133 $69,249 - $207,538
Mechanical - $9,454 $161,906 - - $171,359
Electrical - $163,064 $54,695 $45,744 - $263,504
Plumbing - - $179,032 $10,701 - $189,732
Fire & Life Safety $117,288 $70,637 $2,617 - - $190,543
Technology - $64,029 $618,895 - - $682,925
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $113,500 $98,369 - $211,869
Other $209,088 $379,374 - - $200,736 $789,198
Total $326,618 $735,004 $1,292,363 $302,890 $200,736 $2,857,612
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

171
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Palm ES
Page 94
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

143 Patton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

6001 Westcreek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1986 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 76,687 10,752 87,439
Area (GSF) per student 84 12 96
Number of Classrooms 43 13 56
Permanent Capacity 773
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 914
Utilization (by enrollment) 118% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 908 -135
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 117%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 966 -193 Perm Buildings 76,687 18.1%
2010-11 In Migration 109 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 095 Building A 1 1986 76,687 18.3%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 24.1
Parking Spaces 109

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $13,373 $4,610 - - $17,982 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,631,965*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $2,114 $1,067 - - $3,181
Interior $741 $149,485 $75,223 $40,077 - $265,525
Mechanical $272,094 $961,395 $869,063 - - $2,102,552
Electrical $480 $95,192 $49,465 $30,576 - $175,713
Plumbing - - $163,075 $8,562 - $171,637
Fire & Life Safety $131,145 $75,540 - - - $206,685
Technology - $54,860 $623,617 - - $678,477
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $128,110 $93,252 - $221,363
Other $148,665 $726,882 - - $309,114 $1,184,662
Total $553,125 $2,078,840 $1,914,231 $172,467 $309,114 $5,027,777
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

143
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Patton ES
Page 95
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

128 Pease Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)

1106 Rio Grande Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78701 1876 EX Yes

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 35,624 35,624
Area (GSF) per student 139 0 139
Number of Classrooms 17 0 17
Permanent Capacity 293
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 256
Utilization (by enrollment) 87% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 293
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 293 Perm Buildings 35,624 71.9%
2010-11 In Migration 220 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1876 30,754 72.9%
Building B 1 1998 4,870 15.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 2.8
Parking Spaces 45

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $152,808 $593,903 $168,709 - $915,419 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,141,731*
Roofing - $253,659 - - - $253,659
Structural - - $35,507 - - $35,507
Exterior - $12,413 $409,919 - - $422,332
Interior - - $592,321 $8,135 - $600,456
Mechanical $19,972 $1,741,016 $343,436 - - $2,104,423
Electrical $60,013 $399,673 $591,784 $1,900 - $1,053,370
Plumbing - - $860,135 $20,327 - $880,462
Fire & Life Safety $60,070 $49,702 - $453,498 - $563,270
Technology - $72,214 $244,011 - - $316,225
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties $10,939 - $91,691 $59,933 - $162,563
Other $213,415 $95,838 - - $51,831 $361,083
Total $364,408 $2,777,323 $3,762,707 $712,502 $51,831 $7,668,770
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

128
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pease ES
Page 96
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

129 Pecan Springs Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

3100 Rogge Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1957 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 56,992 9,216 66,208
Area (GSF) per student 107 17 124
Number of Classrooms 30 12 42
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 532
Utilization (by enrollment) 109% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 490 -4
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 501 -15 Perm Buildings 56,992 42.4%
2010-11 In Migration 077 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 068 Building A 1 1957 46,209 48.7%
Building B 1 1990 10,783 24.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.6
Parking Spaces 63

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $11,743 $298,033 - $309,776 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $880,248*
Roofing - $20,585 $25,119 $1,176,056 - $1,221,760
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $990,402 - - $990,402
Interior - $21,355 $237,152 $108,654 - $367,161
Mechanical - $42,908 $1,671,891 - - $1,714,799
Electrical - $150,635 $1,495,356 $38,734 - $1,684,725
Plumbing - - $703,710 $20,398 - $724,108
Fire & Life Safety $99,554 $63,610 - - - $163,165
Technology - $50,268 $475,845 - - $526,112
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $147,312 $78,011 - $225,323
Other $104,559 $277,133 - - $90,134 $471,826
Total $204,113 $676,135 $5,758,530 $1,719,886 $90,134 $8,448,798
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

129
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pecan Springs ES
Page 97
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

190 Perez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

7500 S. Pleasant Valley Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 2006 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 82,223 15,360 97,583
Area (GSF) per student 93 17 110
Number of Classrooms 37 19 56
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 886
Utilization (by enrollment) 148% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 945 -347
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 158%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 980 -382 Perm Buildings 82,223 9.0%
2010-11 In Migration 066 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 123 Building A 1 2006 82,223 9.4%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 28.0
Parking Spaces 106

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $7,999 - - $7,999 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,422,361*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $11,450 - - $11,450
Interior - $42,710 $89,567 $11,718 - $143,996
Mechanical $642,083 - $3,280 - - $645,363
Electrical - $23,827 $58,015 $22,813 - $104,655
Plumbing $431,564 - $119,257 $8,557 - $559,377
Fire & Life Safety $132,552 $81,267 - - - $213,819
Technology - $68,359 $587,513 - - $655,872
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $151,024 $107,721 - $258,745
Other - - - - - $0
Total $1,206,199 $216,162 $1,028,106 $150,809 $0 $2,601,276
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

190
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Perez ES
Page 98
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

164 Pickle Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

1101 Wheatley Avenue Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 2001 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 120,862 6,144 127,006
Area (GSF) per student 163 8 172
Number of Classrooms 39 8 47
Permanent Capacity 617
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 740
Utilization (by enrollment) 120% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 737 -120
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 119%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 802 -185 Perm Buildings 120,862 5.8%
2010-11 In Migration 056 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 058 Building A 1 2001 120,862 5.1%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.5
Parking Spaces 132

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $31,650 $193,425 - $225,074 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $740,017*
Roofing - - $2,429 - - $2,429
Structural - - $3,616 - - $3,616
Exterior - - $12,894 - - $12,894
Interior - $64,457 $93,358 $43,330 - $201,145
Mechanical - $28,582 - - - $28,582
Electrical - - $88,466 $10,218 - $98,684
Plumbing - - $118,451 $23,607 - $142,058
Fire & Life Safety $178,166 $91,255 - - - $269,421
Technology - $78,233 $637,697 - - $715,930
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $120,738 $77,413 - $198,152
Other $88,926 $160,756 - - $116,853 $366,535
Total $267,092 $472,925 $1,109,300 $347,992 $116,853 $2,314,161
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

164
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pickle ES
Page 99
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

151 Pillow Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

3025 Crosscreek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1969 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 54,247 10,752 64,999
Area (GSF) per student 83 16 100
Number of Classrooms 29 14 43
Permanent Capacity 523
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 653
Utilization (by enrollment) 125% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 651 -129
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 125%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 734 -212 Perm Buildings 54,247 41.0%
2010-11 In Migration 095 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 090 Building A 1 1969 54,247 46.3%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.0
Parking Spaces 53

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $97,541 $66,323 $15,011 - $178,875 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $773,433*
Roofing - - $1,602,128 - - $1,602,128
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $30,260 - - $30,260
Interior - $64,065 $447,627 $44,466 - $556,158
Mechanical - $41,700 $1,878,340 - - $1,920,039
Electrical - $969 $728,511 $51,488 - $780,968
Plumbing - $1,216 $1,493,977 $55,933 - $1,551,126
Fire & Life Safety $107,100 $66,281 - - - $173,381
Technology - $49,648 $441,067 - - $490,715
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $179,417 $126,230 - $305,647
Other $116,352 $178,920 - - $2,141,509 $2,436,780
Total $223,451 $549,981 $6,867,650 $293,128 $2,141,509 $10,075,720
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

151
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pillow ES
Page 100
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

130 Pleasant Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

6405 Circle S Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1985 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 65,729 7,680 73,409
Area (GSF) per student 106 12 119
Number of Classrooms 33 10 43
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 619
Utilization (by enrollment) 118% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 631 -107
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 121%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 680 -156 Perm Buildings 65,729 19.6%
2010-11 In Migration 087 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 099 Building A 1 1985 65,729 20.1%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.1
Parking Spaces 71

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $1,550 $82,599 - - $84,149 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $923,566*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $14,892 - - $14,892
Interior - $106,775 $74,243 $11,393 - $192,411
Mechanical - $193,219 $2,242,412 - - $2,435,632
Electrical - - $60,358 $25,744 - $86,101
Plumbing - - $96,882 $6,420 - $103,302
Fire & Life Safety $110,106 $68,128 - - - $178,234
Technology - $52,104 $524,022 - - $576,126
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $149,903 $57,475 - $207,378
Other $228,868 $162,817 - - $389,803 $781,488
Total $338,974 $584,593 $3,245,311 $101,031 $389,803 $4,659,712
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

130
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pleasant Hill ES
Page 101
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

131 Lucy Read Pre-K School Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 64,644
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building A 1 1961 61,575 10.5%
Building B 1 1961 3,069 5.8%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - $40,134 - $40,134
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $51,949 - - $51,949
Interior - - $110,683 $10,593 - $121,277
Mechanical - $576,178 $13,501 - - $589,679
Electrical - $156,212 $242,226 $34,575 - $433,012
Plumbing - - $137,325 $3,211 - $140,537
Fire & Life Safety $119,486 $70,631 $2,617 - - $192,735
Technology - $40,408 $395,364 - - $435,772
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $26,858 $65,901 - $92,758
Other $71,846 $230,214 - - $9,470 $311,530
Total $191,332 $1,073,643 $980,523 $154,414 $9,470 $2,409,383
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

131
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lucy Read Pre-K
Page 102
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

132 Reilly Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

405 Denson Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 1954 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 41,646 6,144 47,790
Area (GSF) per student 141 21 161
Number of Classrooms 20 8 28
Permanent Capacity 318
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 296
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 357 -39
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 366 -48 Perm Buildings 41,646 27.9%
2010-11 In Migration 045 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 100 Building A 1 1954 41,646 29.3%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.8
Parking Spaces 45

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $54,280 $40,134 - $99,019 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,314,017*
Roofing - $71,742 - - - $71,742
Structural - $72,327 - - - $72,327
Exterior - - $368,299 - - $368,299
Interior - $32,360 $97,077 $48,191 - $177,628
Mechanical - $274,430 $1,367,980 - - $1,642,410
Electrical - $172,496 $85,634 $41,902 - $300,032
Plumbing $270,219 - $121,730 $5,350 - $397,300
Fire & Life Safety $66,358 $57,152 - - - $123,510
Technology - $46,630 $306,036 - - $352,667
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $48,642 $67,475 - $116,117
Other $39,270 $206,426 - - $11,517 $257,213
Total $375,848 $938,169 $2,449,679 $203,051 $11,517 $3,978,263
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

132
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Reilly ES
Page 103
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

133 Ridgetop Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

5005 Caswell Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78751 1939 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 35,585 4,608 40,193
Area (GSF) per student 162 21 184
Number of Classrooms 13 6 19
Permanent Capacity 206
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 219
Utilization (by enrollment) 106% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 128 78
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 62%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 131 75 Perm Buildings 35,585 31.2%
2010-11 In Migration 147 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 056 Building A 1 1939 35,185 29.9%
Building B 1 1939 400 8.1%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.0
Parking Spaces 32

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $243,522 $75,461 - - $318,982 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,470,799*
Roofing - - $3,940 - - $3,940
Structural - - $4,502 - - $4,502
Exterior - - $21,397 - - $21,397
Interior - $42,710 $29,297 $451,012 - $523,019
Mechanical - $598,001 $759,217 - - $1,357,218
Electrical - $157,434 $62,616 $3,642 - $223,693
Plumbing - - $150,484 $22,463 - $172,948
Fire & Life Safety $71,510 $53,744 - - - $125,254
Technology - $45,420 $154,913 - - $200,332
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $101,584 $422,259 - $523,843
Other $93,975 $164,484 - - $22,541 $281,000
Total $165,485 $1,305,314 $1,363,411 $899,377 $22,541 $3,756,128
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

133
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ridgetop ES
Page 104
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

174 Rodriguez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

4400 Franklin Park Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1999 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 79,918 16,932 96,850
Area (GSF) per student 88 19 106
Number of Classrooms 44 22 66
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 910
Utilization (by enrollment) 128% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,045 -334
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 147%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,062 -351 Perm Buildings 79,918 8.0%
2010-11 In Migration 079 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 202 Building A 1 1999 69,914 7.2%
Classroom 1 2006 10,004 7.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.0
Parking Spaces 114

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $7,621 $141,062 $42,669 - $191,353 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $801,527*
Roofing - - $985 - - $985
Structural - $238 - - - $238
Exterior - - $534 - - $534
Interior - $132,079 $110,060 $11,709 - $253,847
Mechanical - $62,720 $21,281 - - $84,001
Electrical - - $36,759 $32,319 - $69,078
Plumbing - - $86,792 $9,631 - $96,424
Fire & Life Safety $149,657 $81,989 - - - $231,647
Technology - $50,944 $639,948 - - $690,892
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $163,736 $209,404 - $373,140
Other $80,146 $236,132 - - $64,181 $380,459
Total $229,804 $571,723 $1,201,157 $305,732 $64,181 $2,372,597
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

174
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Rodriguez ES
Page 105
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

127 Sanchez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

73 San Marcos Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1976 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,131 6,144 84,275
Area (GSF) per student 134 11 144
Number of Classrooms 36 8 44
Permanent Capacity 580
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 585
Utilization (by enrollment) 101% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 584 -4
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 644 -64 Perm Buildings 78,131 26.8%
2010-11 In Migration 074 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 061 Building A 1 1976 78,131 27.2%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.2
Parking Spaces 70

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $1,177 - $71,710 $40,134 - $113,020 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,908,630*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $435 $3,633 - - $4,068
Interior - $21,355 $629,419 $114,981 - $765,754
Mechanical - $3,149,421 $357,542 - - $3,506,963
Electrical - $254,788 $574,116 $54,024 - $882,927
Plumbing - $5,336 $168,493 $21,394 - $195,223
Fire & Life Safety $102,706 $64,720 - - - $167,425
Technology - $60,612 $519,647 - - $580,259
Conveyances - $7,768 - - - $7,768
Specialties - - $149,714 $110,084 - $259,798
Other $65,580 $174,732 - - $2,701,170 $2,941,482
Total $169,463 $3,739,168 $2,474,272 $340,616 $2,701,170 $9,424,688
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

127
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Sanchez ES
Page 106
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

139 Sims Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

1203 Springdale Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78721 1956 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 44,337 6,144 50,481
Area (GSF) per student 160 22 182
Number of Classrooms 22 8 30
Permanent Capacity 355
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 277
Utilization (by enrollment) 78% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 343 12
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 97%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 359 -4 Perm Buildings 44,337 38.3%
2010-11 In Migration 016 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 084 Building A 1 1956 12,434 50.9%
Building B 1 1961 17,056 31.9%
Site Data Building C 1 1956 2,482 32.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.4 Building D 1 1956 4,570 51.1%
Parking Spaces 66 Building E 1 1956 7,503 29.2%
Building F 1 1956 292 74.3%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $31,481 $130,753 $129,820 - $292,054 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,618,443*
Roofing - $190,661 $9,533 - - $200,194
Structural - $7,498 - - - $7,498
Exterior - $289 $27,666 $2,221 - $30,175
Interior - $85,420 $209,259 $10,727 - $305,406
Mechanical - - $1,539,650 - - $1,539,650
Electrical - $178,641 $630,997 $31,881 - $841,520
Plumbing $574,623 - $772,506 $12,837 - $1,359,967
Fire & Life Safety $83,676 $58,028 - - - $141,704
Technology - $47,124 $339,322 - - $386,446
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $194,276 $86,504 - $280,780
Other $195,428 $165,575 - - $748,483 $1,109,485
Total $853,727 $764,716 $3,853,963 $273,990 $748,483 $6,494,878
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

139
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Sims ES
Page 107
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

136 St. Elmo Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

600 W. St. Elmo Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1960 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 48,212 3,072 51,284
Area (GSF) per student 159 10 169
Number of Classrooms 26 4 30
Permanent Capacity 411
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 304
Utilization (by enrollment) 74% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 369 42
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 90%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 361 50 Perm Buildings 48,212 44.6%
2010-11 In Migration 029 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 094 Building A 1 1960 48,212 41.6%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.4
Parking Spaces 60

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $797 $48,045 $82,803 - $131,645 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,034,569*
Roofing - $634,713 - - - $634,713
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $1,484,314 - - $1,484,314
Interior - $21,355 $166,724 $14,646 - $202,725
Mechanical - $354,726 $754,316 - - $1,109,042
Electrical - $156,212 $277,126 $40,873 - $474,211
Plumbing - - $1,296,374 $28,881 - $1,325,255
Fire & Life Safety $79,866 $57,477 - - - $137,343
Technology - $48,230 $344,348 - - $392,579
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $160,543 $71,399 - $231,942
Other $436,826 $244,366 - - $1,342,548 $2,023,740
Total $516,693 $1,517,877 $4,531,790 $238,602 $1,342,548 $8,147,509
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

136
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
St. Elmo ES
Page 108
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

138 Summitt Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

12207 Brigadoon Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78727 1986 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 75,902 10,752 86,654
Area (GSF) per student 89 13 101
Number of Classrooms 41 14 55
Permanent Capacity 732
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 854
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 623 109
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 85%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 662 70 Perm Buildings 75,902 26.4%
2010-11 In Migration 288 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 057 Building A 1 1986 65,936 28.5%
Building B 1 1989 9,966 22.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.5
Parking Spaces 107

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $131,854 - - $131,854 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,870,142*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - $28,770 $312,702 $107,046 - $448,518
Mechanical - $2,725,017 $859,228 - - $3,584,245
Electrical $1,224 - $287,592 $27,883 - $316,699
Plumbing $67,453 - $162,629 $18,257 - $248,338
Fire & Life Safety $130,660 $75,368 - - - $206,028
Technology - $54,765 $631,730 - - $686,495
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $242,491 $103,664 - $346,155
Other $254,903 $482,340 - - $234,180 $971,423
Total $454,240 $3,415,902 $2,628,225 $256,850 $234,180 $6,989,397
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

138
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Summitt ES
Page 109
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

158 Sunset Valley Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

3000 Jones Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1971 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 66,467 3,072 69,539
Area (GSF) per student 147 7 154
Number of Classrooms 35 2 37
Permanent Capacity 561
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 451
Utilization (by enrollment) 80% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 483 78
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 86%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 543 18 Perm Buildings 66,467 41.1%
2010-11 In Migration 099 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 135 Building A 1 1971 57,298 46.1%
Building B 1 1996 9,169 10.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.4
Parking Spaces 86

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $23,148 $223,578 - - $246,726 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,122,737*
Roofing - - $1,804,352 - - $1,804,352
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $22,439 - - $22,439
Interior - $42,710 $229,960 $81,622 - $354,292
Mechanical - $2,514,744 $1,388,745 - - $3,903,489
Electrical $5,012 $97,298 $389,217 $31,881 - $523,409
Plumbing - - $465,882 $16,046 - $481,928
Fire & Life Safety $104,397 $71,096 $2,617 - - $178,109
Technology - $52,638 $514,926 - - $567,564
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $98,494 $106,358 - $204,852
Other $61,362 $150,333 - - $2,104,101 $2,315,796
Total $170,770 $2,951,967 $5,140,210 $235,908 $2,104,101 $10,602,957
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

158
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Sunset Valley ES
Page 110
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

140 Travis Heights Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

2010 Alameda Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1938 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 59,589 4,608 64,197
Area (GSF) per student 111 9 120
Number of Classrooms 31 6 37
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 537
Utilization (by enrollment) 110% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 548 -62
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 605 -119 Perm Buildings 59,589 36.4%
2010-11 In Migration 109 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 117 Building A 1 1938 40,576 37.1%
Building B 1 1985 4,992 33.2%
Site Data Building C 1 1994 14,021 19.1%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.2
Parking Spaces 44

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $201,167 $166,361 $2,109 $1,112 - $370,749 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,027,975*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $2,778 $321,483 - $324,261
Interior - $64,065 $159,525 $67,889 - $291,478
Mechanical - $1,907,086 $694,812 - - $2,601,898
Electrical $708 $201,183 $385,584 $14,099 - $601,574
Plumbing $206,194 - $591,645 $14,976 - $812,815
Fire & Life Safety $99,299 $63,515 - - - $162,814
Technology - $56,634 $494,206 - - $550,839
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $79,247 $85,654 - $164,901
Other $435,073 $626,691 - - $1,052,121 $2,113,885
Total $942,440 $3,085,534 $2,409,904 $505,213 $1,052,121 $7,995,213
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

140
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Travis Heights ES
Page 111
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

141 Walnut Creek Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)

401 W. Braker Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78753 1961 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 79,536 16,896 96,432
Area (GSF) per student 87 18 105
Number of Classrooms 41 21 62
Permanent Capacity 655
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 916
Utilization (by enrollment) 140% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 936 -282
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 143%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,002 -348 Perm Buildings 79,536 15.2%
2010-11 In Migration 060 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 094 Building A 1 1961 45,037 25.4%
Building B 1 1999 34,499 5.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.5
Parking Spaces 94

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $67,837 - - $72,444 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,554,343*
Roofing $1,499 $124,656 - - - $126,155
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $2,890 - $837,033 - - $839,923
Interior $610 $3,560 $53,758 $57,599 - $115,526
Mechanical - $654,561 $482,290 - - $1,136,851
Electrical $1,224 $216,949 $268,133 $18,535 - $504,841
Plumbing $130,087 - $139,086 $5,350 - $274,523
Fire & Life Safety $149,776 $81,314 - - - $231,090
Technology - $55,279 $601,051 - - $656,330
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $157,043 $118,152 - $275,195
Other $83,310 $44,022 - - $10,090 $137,422
Total $369,397 $1,184,947 $2,606,231 $199,636 $10,090 $4,370,301
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

141
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Walnut Creek ES
Page 112
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

175 Widen Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

5605 Nuckols Crossing Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1986 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 74,523 15,360 89,883
Area (GSF) per student 97 20 117
Number of Classrooms 42 20 62
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 769
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 794 -121
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 118%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 780 -107 Perm Buildings 74,523 12.8%
2010-11 In Migration 077 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 086 Building A 1 1986 63,666 14.4%
Building B 1 1989 10,857 6.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 92

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $111,624 $4,049 - $115,673 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,199,361*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural $1,801 - $1,144 $2,648 - $5,593
Exterior - $2,640 $13,732 - - $16,372
Interior - $106,775 $131,066 $87,980 - $325,821
Mechanical $1,766 $136,930 $601,976 - - $740,673
Electrical - $137,522 $136,454 $11,802 - $285,779
Plumbing - $748 $134,172 $8,562 - $143,482
Fire & Life Safety $152,816 $80,016 $2,617 - - $235,450
Technology - $55,257 $615,502 - - $670,759
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $280,128 $92,380 - $372,508
Other $188,366 $334,723 - - $244,825 $767,913
Total $344,749 $854,612 $2,028,416 $207,421 $244,825 $3,680,022
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

175
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Widen ES
Page 113
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

166 Williams Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

500 Mairo Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1976 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 64,846 9,216 74,062
Area (GSF) per student 101 14 115
Number of Classrooms 35 12 47
Permanent Capacity 561
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 642
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 640 -79
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 114%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 621 -60 Perm Buildings 64,846 36.9%
2010-11 In Migration 130 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 133 Building A 1 1976 64,846 37.4%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.0
Parking Spaces 107

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $132,390 $129,820 - $262,210 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,368,677*
Roofing - - $20,585 - - $20,585
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $37,251 $223,445 - $260,696
Interior - $106,775 $464,375 $11,930 - $583,081
Mechanical - $3,364,894 $124,994 - - $3,489,887
Electrical - $156,212 $812,293 $46,853 - $1,015,358
Plumbing - - $812,938 $60,184 - $873,122
Fire & Life Safety $114,412 $68,848 - - - $183,260
Technology - $51,800 $522,926 - - $574,726
Conveyances - $248,207 - - - $248,207
Specialties $24,162 - $200,976 $162,006 - $387,145
Other $68,453 $164,915 - - $1,784,696 $2,018,065
Total $207,027 $4,161,651 $3,128,729 $634,239 $1,784,696 $9,916,341
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

166
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Williams ES
Page 114
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

157 Winn Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

3500 Susquehanna Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1970 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 62,087 3,072 65,159
Area (GSF) per student 134 7 141
Number of Classrooms 33 4 37
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 463
Utilization (by enrollment) 88% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 485 39
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 93%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 531 -7 Perm Buildings 62,087 22.9%
2010-11 In Migration 044 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 082 Building A 1 1970 52,117 20.1%
Building B 1 1990 9,970 19.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.0
Parking Spaces 66

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $1,255 - $107,297 $40,134 - $148,686 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,489,481*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - $2,248 - - - $2,248
Exterior - - $10,312 - - $10,312
Interior - $42,710 $212,348 $188,858 - $443,916
Mechanical - $458,519 $748,631 - - $1,207,150
Electrical - $139,476 $136,299 $36,239 - $312,013
Plumbing - - $709,008 $9,629 - $718,637
Fire & Life Safety $100,345 $63,878 - - - $164,223
Technology - $51,835 $479,005 - - $530,840
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $182,446 $84,899 - $267,345
Other $347,515 $281,701 - - $6,577,791 $7,207,006
Total $449,115 $1,040,367 $2,585,347 $359,758 $6,577,791 $11,012,376
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

157
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Winn ES
Page 115
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

152 Wooldridge Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)

1412 Norseman Terrace Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78758 1969 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 68,543 19,968 88,511
Area (GSF) per student 78 23 101
Number of Classrooms 33 26 59
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 878
Utilization (by enrollment) 168% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,160 -636
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 222%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,255 -731 Perm Buildings 68,543 26.0%
2010-11 In Migration 061 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 342 Building A 1 1969 58,805 34.3%
Building B 1 1998 9,738 12.5%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.6
Parking Spaces 60

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $37,700 $64,475 - $106,781 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,193,014*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - $1,501 - - - $1,501
Exterior - $5,265 $58,900 - - $64,165
Interior - $21,355 $115,574 $163,182 - $300,111
Mechanical - $1,955,836 $598,166 - - $2,554,002
Electrical - $127,754 $744,954 $55,369 - $928,077
Plumbing $279,864 - $991,130 $10,698 - $1,281,692
Fire & Life Safety $141,507 $85,010 - - - $226,517
Technology - $52,683 $500,564 - - $553,247
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $245,253 $66,737 - $311,991
Other $234,894 $282,741 - - $3,072 $520,707
Total $656,264 $2,536,750 $3,292,242 $360,461 $3,072 $6,848,790
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

152
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Wooldridge ES
Page 116
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

144 Wooten Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

1406 Dale Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1955 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 53,689 18,432 72,121
Area (GSF) per student 77 27 104
Number of Classrooms 29 22 51
Permanent Capacity 468
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 695
Utilization (by enrollment) 149% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 672 -205
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 144%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 737 -270 Perm Buildings 53,689 56.2%
2010-11 In Migration 125 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 093 Building A 1 1955 53,689 66.1%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.7
Parking Spaces 37

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $1,112 $600,277 $322,375 - $923,764 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,419,450*
Roofing - $869,684 - - - $869,684
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $1,537 $5,198 $989,383 - - $996,119
Interior $5,198 $313,900 $173,390 $44,338 - $536,826
Mechanical - $37,918 $2,974,774 - - $3,012,692
Electrical - $1,409,389 $60,569 $11,248 - $1,481,205
Plumbing $469,996 $1,009,843 $683,568 $31,163 - $2,194,571
Fire & Life Safety $119,270 $71,393 - - - $190,662
Technology - $48,984 $471,209 - - $520,193
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $145,753 $132,609 - $278,362
Other $437,749 $518,995 - - $1,159,269 $2,116,013
Total $1,033,751 $4,385,700 $6,098,924 $541,732 $1,159,269 $13,219,375
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

144
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Wooten ES
Page 117
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

145 Zavala Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)

310 Robert Martinez, Jr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1937 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,333 69,333
Area (GSF) per student 170 0 170
Number of Classrooms 36 0 36
Permanent Capacity 580
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 407
Utilization (by enrollment) 70% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 347 233
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 60%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 353 227 Perm Buildings 69,333 31.2%
2010-11 In Migration 082 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 043 Building A 1 1937 69,333 28.8%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.4
Parking Spaces 12

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $1,196 $285,274 - - $286,470 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,219,158*
Roofing - $798 - - - $798
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $38,935 $14,187 - $53,122
Interior - - $260,945 $236,385 - $497,329
Mechanical - $184,809 $1,186,345 - - $1,371,153
Electrical $5,100 $89,265 $578,418 $65,592 - $738,375
Plumbing $505,507 - $1,731,549 $6,420 - $2,243,476
Fire & Life Safety $100,572 $64,748 $2,617 - - $167,937
Technology - $56,381 $504,384 - - $560,765
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - $13,163 $157,349 $91,473 - $261,985
Other $197,619 - - - $76,545 $274,164
Total $808,799 $410,359 $4,745,816 $414,056 $76,545 $6,455,575
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

145
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Zavala ES
Page 118
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

146 Zilker Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)

1900 Bluebonnet Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1950 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 50,941 10,752 61,693
Area (GSF) per student 98 21 118
Number of Classrooms 26 14 40
Permanent Capacity 460
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 522
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 338 122
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 74%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 358 102 Perm Buildings 50,941 55.0%
2010-11 In Migration 204 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 018 Building A 1 1950 42,029 63.5%
Gymnasium 1 1961 2,827 46.1%
Site Data Library 1 1990 5,488 22.0%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.8 Vocational 1 1950 597 45.8%
Parking Spaces 54

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $632,521 $210,344 - $842,866 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,671,300*
Roofing - $1,156,604 $56,360 - - $1,212,964
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $24,894 - $344,625 - - $369,519
Interior - $22,794 $233,797 $511,261 - $767,852
Mechanical - $204,753 $2,049,476 - - $2,254,229
Electrical - $83,685 $466,878 $23,564 - $574,127
Plumbing $401,750 $453,178 $1,231,355 $9,629 - $2,095,911
Fire & Life Safety $98,303 $63,990 $2,617 - - $164,909
Technology - $44,347 $360,804 - - $405,151
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $181,621 $98,504 - $280,125
Other $243,324 $873,679 - - $2,565,129 $3,682,132
Total $768,270 $2,903,030 $5,560,055 $853,301 $2,565,129 $12,649,785
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

146
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Zilker ES
Page 119
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

059 Bailey Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

4020 Lost Oasis Hollow Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78739 1993 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 148,143 10,752 158,895
Area (GSF) per student 142 10 153
Number of Classrooms 56 11 67
Permanent Capacity 1,176
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,041
Utilization (by enrollment) 89% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 979 197
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,048 128 Perm Buildings 148,143 16.4%
2010-11 In Migration 196 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 129 Building A 1 1993 148,143 14.2%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.3
Parking Spaces 138

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $13,797 $27,289 $824,676 - $865,762 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,415,692*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $220,269 $192,392 - $412,661
Interior - $149,485 $94,214 $72,955 - $316,654
Mechanical $14,691 $1,769,423 $1,889,503 - - $3,673,618
Electrical - - $242,787 $3,406 - $246,192
Plumbing - - $236,111 $24,615 $1,568 $262,294
Fire & Life Safety $233,448 $125,051 $14,217 - - $372,716
Technology - $197,531 $972,186 - - $1,169,717
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $161,190 $142,753 - $303,943
Other $470,451 $392,173 - - $173,780 $1,036,404
Total $718,590 $2,697,101 $3,857,767 $1,260,797 $175,348 $8,709,604
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

059
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bailey MS

Page 120
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

054 Bedichek Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

6800 Bill Hughes Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1972 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 130,600 27,018 157,618
Area (GSF) per student 124 26 150
Number of Classrooms 48 31 79
Permanent Capacity 941
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,054
Utilization (by enrollment) 112% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,219 -278
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,340 -399 Perm Buildings 130,600 30.4%
2010-11 In Migration 100 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 248 Building A 1 1972 91,844 30.1%
Gymnasium 1 1972 28,847 50.9%
Site Data Building C 1 1997 9,909 5.5%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 23.3
Parking Spaces 140

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $192,275 $824,676 - $1,016,951 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $9,997,350*
Roofing - $751,119 - - - $751,119
Structural - $11,113 - - - $11,113
Exterior - - $2,929 - - $2,929
Interior $224 $192,195 $777,850 $331,731 - $1,301,999
Mechanical $5,200,844 $2,584,586 $1,231,358 - - $9,016,787
Electrical - - $554,802 $92,282 - $647,084
Plumbing - - $417,426 $30,027 - $447,452
Fire & Life Safety $305,625 $162,630 $10,469 - - $478,724
Technology - $97,631 $886,402 - - $984,033
Conveyances $214,837 $49,641 - - - $264,479
Specialties - - $90,013 $238,298 - $328,311
Other $330,347 $96,558 - - $13,573,742 $14,000,646
Total $6,051,876 $3,945,474 $4,163,524 $1,517,014 $13,573,742 $29,251,629
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

054
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bedichek MS

Page 121
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

046 Burnet Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

8401 Hathaway Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1961 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 137,768 18,432 156,200
Area (GSF) per student 138 18 157
Number of Classrooms 53 22 75
Permanent Capacity 1,039
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 998
Utilization (by enrollment) 96% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,170 -131
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,365 -326 Perm Buildings 137,768 37.0%
2010-11 In Migration 060 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 203 Building A 1 1961 136,743 38.1%
Mechanical 1 1969 1,025 0.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 23.7
Parking Spaces 50

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $114,714 $3,688 $1,052,251 - $1,170,654 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $9,134,830*
Roofing - - $1,960,943 - - $1,960,943
Structural - $3,472 $1,853 - - $5,325
Exterior - $658,450 $8,270 - - $666,720
Interior - $220,015 $393,331 $20,695 - $634,041
Mechanical - $6,740,553 $1,631,819 - - $8,372,373
Electrical - $284,750 $2,593,935 $72,232 - $2,950,918
Plumbing $315,941 $3,631 $455,103 $28,960 - $803,635
Fire & Life Safety $217,661 $119,840 $2,617 - - $340,118
Technology - $82,434 $854,942 - - $937,377
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $398,072 $287,254 - $685,326
Other $146,741 $176,985 - - $1,181,923 $1,505,649
Total $680,343 $8,454,488 $8,304,574 $1,461,392 $1,181,923 $20,082,718
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

046
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Burnet MS

Page 122
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

057 Covington Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

3700 Convict Hill Rd Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 1986 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 173,636 4,608 178,244
Area (GSF) per student 216 6 221
Number of Classrooms 63 5 68
Permanent Capacity 1,323
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 805
Utilization (by enrollment) 61% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 905 418
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 68%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 984 339 Perm Buildings 173,636 18.6%
2010-11 In Migration 181 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 260 Building A 1 1986 134,657 17.8%
Auditorium 1 1986 20,672 19.1%
Site Data Vocational 1 1986 18,307 17.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 21.3
Parking Spaces 122

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $243 $220,213 $79,540 - $299,996 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,064,435*
Roofing - $146,046 $1,050 - - $147,096
Structural - - $1,775 - - $1,775
Exterior - $6,006 $31,080 - - $37,086
Interior - $21,355 $125,006 $187,566 - $333,928
Mechanical $271,148 $2,997,320 $2,777,473 - - $6,045,940
Electrical - $297,742 $374,659 $66,064 - $738,464
Plumbing - - $366,484 $31,967 - $398,450
Fire & Life Safety $247,938 $156,334 $33,669 - - $437,941
Technology - $97,536 $975,699 - - $1,073,235
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $218,812 $314,103 - $532,914
Other $442,312 $330,814 - - $1,412,579 $2,185,706
Total $961,398 $4,103,037 $5,125,919 $679,240 $1,412,579 $12,282,173
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

057
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Covington MS

Page 123
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

055 Dobie Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

1200 E. Rundberg Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78753 1973 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 134,563 6,144 140,707
Area (GSF) per student 214 10 223
Number of Classrooms 46 8 54
Permanent Capacity 902
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 630
Utilization (by enrollment) 70% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 719 183
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 80%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 828 74 Perm Buildings 134,563 15.7%
2010-11 In Migration 063 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 130 Building A 1 1973 123,999 13.7%
Building B 1 2006 10,564 7.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 20.2
Parking Spaces 120

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $2,437 $229,980 $779,468 - $1,011,886 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,270,517*
Roofing - - - $12,482 - $12,482
Structural $5,402 - - - - $5,402
Exterior $15,417 - - - - $15,417
Interior $42,171 $6,076 $651,349 $19,849 - $719,444
Mechanical $274,000 $706,326 $550,219 - - $1,530,545
Electrical $22,712 $200,845 $696,953 $26,695 - $947,204
Plumbing $86,955 - $559,840 $38,660 - $685,455
Fire & Life Safety $205,797 $104,739 $7,852 - - $318,388
Technology - $116,153 $817,034 - - $933,187
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $300,442 $286,623 - $587,065
Other $172,266 $209,938 - - $5,893,686 $6,275,891
Total $824,720 $1,445,797 $3,813,669 $1,163,776 $5,893,686 $13,141,649
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

055
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Dobie MS

Page 124
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

043 Fulmore Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

201 East Mary Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1911 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 159,699 7,680 167,379
Area (GSF) per student 161 8 168
Number of Classrooms 55 9 64
Permanent Capacity 1,078
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 995
Utilization (by enrollment) 92% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 850 228
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 79%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 990 88 Perm Buildings 159,699 39.9%
2010-11 In Migration 295 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 138 Building A 1 1911 72,664 43.2%
Cafeteria 1 1980 55,143 37.8%
Site Data Vocational 1 1980 18,500 52.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.8 Building D 1 2002 13,392 7.5%
Parking Spaces 85

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $3,001 $4,218 $435,203 $16,796 - $459,218 Repair priorities 1 & 2 -
$10,058,388*
Roofing $4,239 - $27,564 - - $31,803
Structural - $3,151 $31,127 - - $34,279
Exterior - $2,011 $115,018 - - $117,028
Interior - $55,487 $613,894 $483,943 - $1,153,324
Mechanical - $7,353,742 $1,845,434 - - $9,199,177
Electrical - $5,580 $4,806,824 $574,802 - $5,387,205
Plumbing $506,149 - $1,253,927 $94,647 - $1,854,724
Fire & Life Safety $237,738 $150,179 $35,577 - - $423,494
Technology - $122,392 $973,199 - - $1,095,590
Conveyances - $49,641 $8,858 - - $58,499
Specialties - - $150,593 $341,284 - $491,878
Other $866,429 $694,429 - - $353,775 $1,914,633
Total $1,617,557 $8,440,831 $10,297,217 $1,511,473 $353,775 $22,220,853
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

043
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Fulmore MS

Page 125
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

056 Garcia Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

7414 Johnny Morris Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78724 2008 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 160,764 160,764
Area (GSF) per student 244 0 244
Number of Classrooms 62 0 62
Permanent Capacity 1,215
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 658
Utilization (by enrollment) 54% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 829 386
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 68%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 901 314 Perm Buildings 160,764 4.7%
2010-11 In Migration 027 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 131 Building A 1 2008 160,764 4.5%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.3
Parking Spaces 160

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - - - $0 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $717,098*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - - $105,789 $65,660 - $171,449
Mechanical - $133,965 - - - $133,965
Electrical - - $86,118 $4,515 - $90,633
Plumbing - - $116,926 $30,029 - $146,955
Fire & Life Safety $341,779 $83,119 $38,970 - - $463,868
Technology - $108,594 $1,089,676 - - $1,198,270
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $39,734 $156,485 - $196,219
Other - - - - - $0
Total $341,779 $375,320 $1,477,213 $256,690 $0 $2,451,001
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

056
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Garcia MS

Page 126
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

062 Gorzycki Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

7412 West Slaughter Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 2009 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 175,543 175,543
Area (GSF) per student 182 0 182
Number of Classrooms 63 0 63
Permanent Capacity 1,323
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 963
Utilization (by enrollment) 73% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 989 334
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 75%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,071 252 Perm Buildings 175,543 4.6%
2010-11 In Migration 108 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 132 Building A 1 2009 175,543 4.4%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.2
Parking Spaces 160

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - $40,134 - $40,134 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $640,006*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - - $108,064 $73,924 - $181,987
Mechanical - $103,990 $20,852 - - $124,842
Electrical - - $127,097 $2,376 - $129,472
Plumbing - - $157,202 $18,190 - $175,392
Fire & Life Safety $309,464 $87,857 $5,235 - - $402,556
Technology - $138,695 $1,099,309 - - $1,238,004
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $33,711 $300,646 - $334,357
Other - - - - - $0
Total $309,464 $330,542 $1,551,469 $435,269 $0 $2,626,743
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

062
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Gorzycki MS

Page 127
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

044 Kealing Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

1607 Pennsylvania Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1986 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 192,181 192,181
Area (GSF) per student 156 0 156
Number of Classrooms 80 0 80
Permanent Capacity 1,568
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,233
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 541 1,027
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 35%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 614 954 Perm Buildings 192,181 17.8%
2010-11 In Migration 806 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 064 Building A 1 1986 101,579 18.5%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1986 55,783 22.0%
Site Data Building C 1 2007 34,819 3.6%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Parking Spaces 160

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $82,009 $322,375 - $404,383 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,166,436*
Roofing - $3,530,397 - - - $3,530,397
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $129,828 - - $129,828
Interior - $30,226 $364,756 $127,864 - $522,845
Mechanical - $414,668 $2,119,963 - - $2,534,631
Electrical $67,252 $180,541 $313,476 $33,349 - $594,617
Plumbing - - $503,134 $28,962 - $532,097
Fire & Life Safety $260,502 $149,268 $44,560 - - $454,330
Technology - $150,808 $1,362,779 - - $1,513,586
Conveyances $8,858 $49,641 - - - $58,499
Specialties - - $175,692 $449,683 - $625,375
Other $39,330 $284,944 - - $464,321 $788,595
Total $375,942 $4,790,494 $5,096,196 $962,232 $464,321 $11,689,185
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

044
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Kealing MS

Page 128
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

045 Lamar Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

6201 Wynona Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1955 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 121,371 4,608 125,979
Area (GSF) per student 201 8 209
Number of Classrooms 48 4 52
Permanent Capacity 1,008
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 604
Utilization (by enrollment) 60% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 583 425
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 58%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 642 366 Perm Buildings 121,371 19.2%
2010-11 In Migration 223 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 191 Building A 1 1955 104,981 18.8%
Band 1 2000 9,032 5.6%
Site Data Building C 1 2000 5,354 7.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.3 Mechanical 1 2000 2,004 0.1%
Parking Spaces 106

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $5,195 - $29,823 $869,155 - $904,172 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,961,880*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural $9,432 - $39,783 - - $49,215
Exterior $847 $433,743 - - - $434,590
Interior - $85,501 $243,886 $24,393 - $353,780
Mechanical $290,910 $1,247,215 $700,617 - - $2,238,742
Electrical $197,826 $307,218 $139,583 $47,865 - $692,493
Plumbing $2,903 $557,289 $806,107 $18,193 - $1,384,491
Fire & Life Safety $169,084 $115,092 $17,966 - - $302,142
Technology - $116,800 $852,286 - - $969,086
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $121,330 $149,732 - $271,062
Other $191,867 $230,959 - - $19,344 $442,170
Total $868,064 $3,093,816 $2,951,381 $1,109,337 $19,344 $8,041,942
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

045
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lamar MS

Page 129
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

051 Martin Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

1601 Haskell Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1966 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 107,983 10,752 118,735
Area (GSF) per student 169 17 186
Number of Classrooms 41 11 52
Permanent Capacity 804
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 639
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,056 -252
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 131%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,184 -380 Perm Buildings 107,983 34.5%
2010-11 In Migration 075 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 429 Building A 1 1966 55,290 40.7%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1966 52,693 29.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Parking Spaces 94

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $775 $128,147 $86,678 - $215,600 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $8,670,092*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $1,302 $8,681 - $9,982
Exterior - $435 $110,908 $112,950 - $224,293
Interior - $130,569 $900,382 $44,881 - $1,075,831
Mechanical $224,290 $4,765,063 $388,840 - - $5,378,194
Electrical - $2,018,450 $667,931 $35,746 - $2,722,127
Plumbing - $596,239 $1,063,034 $36,516 - $1,695,789
Fire & Life Safety $182,171 $101,186 $16,480 - - $299,837
Technology - $103,356 $719,130 - - $822,486
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $99,298 $306,386 - $405,683
Other $123,167 $325,108 - - $2,902,231 $3,350,506
Total $529,628 $8,140,464 $4,095,451 $631,836 $2,902,231 $16,299,611
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

051
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Martin MS

Page 130
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

058 Mendez Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

5106 Village Square Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1987 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 173,382 13,824 187,206
Area (GSF) per student 195 16 210
Number of Classrooms 62 18 80
Permanent Capacity 1,215
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 890
Utilization (by enrollment) 73% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,266 -51
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 104%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,373 -158 Perm Buildings 173,382 15.0%
2010-11 In Migration 027 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 396 Building A 1 1987 135,158 12.5%
Auditorium 1 1987 20,672 14.1%
Site Data Vocational 1 1987 17,552 19.2%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 20.7
Parking Spaces 139

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $3,144 $30,858 $482,213 - $516,215 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,556,427*
Roofing - $5,877 - - - $5,877
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $193 $3,653 $25,747 - $29,594
Interior - $60,253 $235,743 $17,936 - $313,933
Mechanical $412,860 $3,475,547 $10,551 - - $3,898,957
Electrical - $132,718 $990,129 $26,774 - $1,149,620
Plumbing - - $154,472 $36,518 - $190,990
Fire & Life Safety $271,136 $157,700 $58,777 - - $487,613
Technology - $125,787 $1,090,662 - - $1,216,449
Conveyances - $108,141 - - - $108,141
Specialties - - $153,360 $314,681 - $468,041
Other $396,215 $406,857 - - $1,452,455 $2,255,527
Total $1,080,210 $4,476,217 $2,728,204 $903,869 $1,452,455 $10,640,955
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

058
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Mendez MS

Page 131
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

052 Murchison Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

3700 North Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78731 1967 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 123,348 16,256 139,604
Area (GSF) per student 96 13 109
Number of Classrooms 53 20 73
Permanent Capacity 1,113
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,281
Utilization (by enrollment) 115% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,171 -58
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 105%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,301 -188 Perm Buildings 123,348 20.1%
2010-11 In Migration 220 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 110 Building A 1 1967 105,457 24.5%
Building B 1 1998 16,628 5.8%
Site Data Storage 1 1987 367
Gross Site Area (Acres) 26.2 Greenhouse 1 1979 896 10.8%
Parking Spaces 124

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $17,512 - - $17,512 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,230,595*
Roofing - $819,716 - - - $819,716
Structural $2,810 - - - - $2,810
Exterior - $5,383 $337 - - $5,720
Interior - $170,840 $184,603 $724,559 - $1,080,002
Mechanical $32,241 $303,841 $3,200,218 - - $3,536,300
Electrical - - $793,678 $63,925 - $857,603
Plumbing $86,955 - $469,564 $25,685 - $582,203
Fire & Life Safety $214,865 $135,922 $41,521 - - $392,308
Technology - $78,856 $882,096 - - $960,952
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $330,166 $225,844 - $556,010
Other $151,066 $228,101 - - $8,153,256 $8,532,423
Total $487,937 $1,742,658 $5,919,695 $1,040,012 $8,153,256 $17,343,558
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

052
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Murchison MS

Page 132
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

047 O. Henry Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

2610 West 10th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78703 1953 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 124,320 6,144 130,464
Area (GSF) per student 121 6 127
Number of Classrooms 45 8 53
Permanent Capacity 945
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,026
Utilization (by enrollment) 109% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 804 141
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 85%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 897 48 Perm Buildings 124,320 13.0%
2010-11 In Migration 485 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 183 Building A 1 1953 124,320 11.3%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.8
Parking Spaces 103

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $490,406 $5,561 - $495,967 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,168,849*
Roofing - - $65,137 - - $65,137
Structural - - $33,856 - - $33,856
Exterior - $725 $49,612 - - $50,337
Interior - $85,420 $158,448 $37,802 - $281,670
Mechanical - $187,659 $89,395 - - $277,054
Electrical - $244,583 $266,248 $86,974 - $597,805
Plumbing - - $1,954,926 $34,313 - $1,989,239
Fire & Life Safety $191,584 $127,909 $15,349 - - $334,841
Technology - $92,335 $808,610 - - $900,945
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $82,367 $204,056 - $286,423
Other $95,479 $93,514 - - $3,229,843 $3,418,835
Total $287,063 $881,787 $4,014,354 $368,706 $3,229,843 $8,781,752
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

047
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
O. Henry MS

Page 133
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

061 Paredes Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

10100 S. Mary Moore Searight Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 2000 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 148,695 6,144 154,839
Area (GSF) per student 160 7 166
Number of Classrooms 59 8 67
Permanent Capacity 1,156
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 930
Utilization (by enrollment) 80% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,165 -9
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,293 -137 Perm Buildings 148,695 11.0%
2010-11 In Migration 069 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 291 Building A 1 2000 79,374 9.9%
Administration 1 2000 6,002 7.3%
Site Data Building C 1 2000 4,035 27.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 78.2 Cafeteria 1 2000 15,854 4.3%
Parking Spaces 108 Band 1 2000 9,072 8.9%
Gymnasium 1 2000 34,358 5.1%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $99,871 $121,562 $208,564 - $429,998 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,754,365*
Roofing - $36,100 - - - $36,100
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $6,745 - - $6,745
Interior - $29,667 $214,395 $101,633 - $345,695
Mechanical $133,382 $85,083 $18,278 - - $236,742
Electrical - - $449,283 $71,212 - $520,495
Plumbing - - $330,677 $42,936 - $373,613
Fire & Life Safety $228,900 $150,096 $56,160 - - $435,155
Technology - $104,752 $1,036,362 - - $1,141,114
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Specialties - - $93,998 $1,064,189 - $1,158,186
Other $277,115 $460,476 - - $274,674 $1,012,265
Total $639,397 $1,114,968 $2,327,460 $1,488,533 $274,674 $5,845,031
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

061
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Paredes MS

Page 134
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

048 Pearce Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

6401 N. Hampton Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1958 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 132,596 1,536 134,132
Area (GSF) per student 403 5 408
Number of Classrooms 55 1 56
Permanent Capacity 1,078
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 329
Utilization (by enrollment) 31% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 712 366
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 66%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 846 232 Perm Buildings 132,596 15.2%
2010-11 In Migration 328 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 510 Building A 1 1958 123,959 15.0%
Auditorium 1 1958 8,637 4.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.8
Parking Spaces 82

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $136,893 $200,295 - - $337,189 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,237,960*
Roofing - $387,171 - - - $387,171
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $439,716 - - $439,716
Interior - $28,343 $228,645 $120,791 - $377,779
Mechanical $424,494 $570,030 $238,457 - - $1,232,982
Electrical - - $862,081 $42,854 - $904,935
Plumbing - - $1,079,726 $18,193 - $1,097,919
Fire & Life Safety $191,660 $103,728 $17,966 - - $313,354
Technology - $122,320 $849,279 - - $971,599
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $152,749 $176,304 - $329,053
Other $184,723 $38,956 - - $778,495 $1,002,174
Total $800,877 $1,437,083 $4,068,914 $358,142 $778,495 $7,443,511
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

048
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pearce MS

Page 135
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

028 Ann Richards School Grades Served 6-9 (MS)

2206 Prather Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1958 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 130,240 7,424 137,664
Area (GSF) per student 247 14 261
Number of Classrooms 44 6 50
Permanent Capacity 924
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 528
Utilization (by enrollment) 57% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 924
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 924 Perm Buildings 130,240 32.2%
2010-11 In Migration 526 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1958 118,655 35.0%
Mechanical 1 1958 1,114 3.2%
Site Data Band 1 1998 3,471 11.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.3 Building D 1 2010 7,000 4.6%
Parking Spaces 90

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $2,658 $92,455 $322,375 - $417,487 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,099,300*
Roofing - $2,660 $1,447,650 - - $1,450,310
Structural $7,066 $10,864 $6,455 - - $24,385
Exterior - - $32,701 - - $32,701
Interior - - $212,462 $181,719 - $394,181
Mechanical - $1,997,171 $4,758,516 - - $6,755,687
Electrical - $195,266 $493,696 $24,159 - $713,121
Plumbing $1,216,601 - $1,714,379 $13,914 - $2,944,894
Fire & Life Safety $201,671 $132,686 $11,600 - - $345,957
Technology - $148,770 $789,429 - - $938,199
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $76,149 $233,139 - $309,289
Other $82,916 $100,972 - - $126,188 $310,076
Total $1,508,254 $2,591,046 $9,635,493 $775,306 $126,188 $14,636,287
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

028
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ann Richards School

Page 136
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

060 Small Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

4801 Monterey Oaks Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 1999 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 160,599 4,608 165,207
Area (GSF) per student 167 5 172
Number of Classrooms 59 4 63
Permanent Capacity 1,239
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 959
Utilization (by enrollment) 77% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 876 363
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,008 231 Perm Buildings 160,599 6.9%
2010-11 In Migration 183 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 097 Building A 1 1999 160,599 6.6%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 36.5
Parking Spaces 108

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $832 - $136,337 - - $137,169 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,538,017*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $4,284 $6,119 - - $10,403
Interior - $64,065 $142,138 $8,628 - $214,831
Mechanical $26,588 $431,732 $42,561 - - $500,882
Electrical - $173,490 $223,754 $31,131 - $428,375
Plumbing - $30,214 $102,766 $41,871 - $174,851
Fire & Life Safety $233,877 $142,267 $8,983 - - $385,126
Technology - $100,499 $1,022,152 - - $1,122,650
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $158,002 $272,576 - $430,577
Other $93,147 $137,739 - - $162,029 $392,915
Total $354,444 $1,183,574 $1,842,811 $354,205 $162,029 $3,897,063
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

060
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Small MS

Page 137
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

053 Webb Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)

601 E. St. Johns Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 1961 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 120,987 9,216 130,203
Area (GSF) per student 205 16 220
Number of Classrooms 41 11 52
Permanent Capacity 804
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 591
Utilization (by enrollment) 74% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 731 73
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 91%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 866 -62 Perm Buildings 120,987 25.1%
2010-11 In Migration 047 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 131 Building A 1 1961 110,133 26.1%
Building B 1 2008 10,854 0.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.6
Parking Spaces 93

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $32,456 $68,081 $824,676 - $925,213 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,889,101*
Roofing - $915,170 - $1,206 - $916,377
Structural $1,774 - - - - $1,774
Exterior - $144 $42,468 - - $42,612
Interior - $131,246 $219,613 $258,925 - $609,785
Mechanical - $3,663,738 $653,287 - - $4,317,025
Electrical - $107,683 $1,006,111 $98,064 - $1,211,858
Plumbing $279,864 - $613,744 $18,195 - $911,803
Fire & Life Safety $180,725 $108,863 $22,069 - - $311,657
Technology - $59,544 $656,548 - - $716,092
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $134,682 $213,638 - $348,320
Other $239,808 $168,085 - - $733,661 $1,141,554
Total $702,171 $5,186,931 $3,416,602 $1,414,705 $733,661 $11,454,070
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

053
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Webb MS

Page 138
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

017 Akins High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)

10701 South 1st St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 2000 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 324,950 31,616 356,566
Area (GSF) per student 119 12 131
Number of Classrooms 114 38 152
Permanent Capacity 2,394
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,720
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 3,092 -698
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 129%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 3,305 -911 Perm Buildings 324,950 6.5%
2010-11 In Migration 176 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 596 Building A 1 2000 194,425 8.0%
Theatre 1 2000 39,881 4.2%
Site Data Gymnasium 1 2000 48,566 2.0%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 57.7 Cafeteria 1 2000 21,733 1.3%
Parking Spaces 659 Greenhouse 1 2004 3,079 3.2%
Classroom 1 2008 17,266 5.3%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $8,006 $1,530 - $655,397 - $664,932 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,670,842*
Roofing - $13,363 - - - $13,363
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $129,395 - - $129,395
Interior - $42,710 $551,282 $48,002 - $641,994
Mechanical - $520,965 $59,616 - - $580,581
Electrical - $7,162 $175,205 $65,510 - $247,877
Plumbing - - $267,011 $85,304 - $352,315
Fire & Life Safety $671,824 $277,782 $8,983 - - $958,589
Technology - $210,114 $1,966,674 - - $2,176,788
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $243,956 $598,275 - $842,231
Other $274,429 $543,674 - - $134,171 $952,274
Total $954,259 $1,716,584 $3,402,121 $1,452,488 $134,171 $7,659,622
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

017
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Akins HS

Page 139
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

009 Anderson High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)

8403 Mesa Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78759 1973 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 309,329 1,536 310,865
Area (GSF) per student 148 1 149
Number of Classrooms 113 1 114
Permanent Capacity 2,373
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,089
Utilization (by enrollment) 88% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,962 411
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,147 226 Perm Buildings 309,329 33.9%
2010-11 In Migration 391 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 257 Building A 1 1973 171,233 33.9%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1973 121,018 36.7%
Site Data Library 1 2000 17,078 2.7%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 38.8
Parking Spaces 760

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,669 $136,181 $51,280 - $192,130 Repair priorities 1 & 2 -
$15,517,625*
Roofing - $96,476 - - - $96,476
Structural - - $61,757 - - $61,757
Exterior $2,067 - $462,026 - - $464,092
Interior $3,678 $352,284 $3,431,791 $944,800 - $4,732,553
Mechanical - $11,645,993 $771,481 - - $12,417,474
Electrical - $717,293 $950,278 $57,350 - $1,724,921
Plumbing $172,062 $292,453 $636,882 $125,657 - $1,227,053
Fire & Life Safety $470,913 $363,018 $29,211 - - $863,142
Technology - $312,614 $2,218,774 - - $2,531,388
Conveyances - $358,670 - - - $358,670
Specialties - - $391,446 $576,918 - $968,364
Other $223,608 $501,829 - - $7,822,456 $8,547,893
Total $872,327 $14,645,298 $9,089,827 $1,756,005 $7,822,456 $34,185,912
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

009
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Anderson HS

Page 140
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

002 Austin High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)

1715 W. Cesar Chavez Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78703 1975 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 307,089 7,680 314,769
Area (GSF) per student 131 3 135
Number of Classrooms 105 8 113
Permanent Capacity 2,205
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,337
Utilization (by enrollment) 106% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,958 247
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 89%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,146 59 Perm Buildings 307,089 30.3%
2010-11 In Migration 789 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 449 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1975 283,518 31.4%
Theatre 1 2000 23,571 3.1%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 44.3
Parking Spaces 544

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $531,086 $811,547 - $1,342,633 Repair priorities 1 & 2 -
$10,276,258*
Roofing - $1,420,421 - - - $1,420,421
Structural - $35,970 - - - $35,970
Exterior $20,833 $539 $36,126 $112,707 - $170,205
Interior - $21,355 $4,242,696 $2,540,593 - $6,804,644
Mechanical $891,141 $5,676,021 $2,448,378 - - $9,015,540
Electrical - $20,527 $4,314,241 $39,527 - $4,374,295
Plumbing - - $2,691,810 $35,372 - $2,727,183
Fire & Life Safety $444,850 $274,031 $32,183 - - $751,064
Technology - $290,897 $1,862,990 - - $2,153,887
Conveyances - $337,711 - - - $337,711
Specialties - - $209,276 $615,356 - $824,632
Other $383,831 $458,131 - - $8,187,414 $9,029,376
Total $1,740,655 $8,535,603 $16,368,786 $4,155,102 $8,187,414 $38,987,561
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

002
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Austin HS

Page 141
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

013 Bowie High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)

4103 Slaughter Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 1988 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 417,702 19,968 437,670
Area (GSF) per student 145 7 152
Number of Classrooms 142 25 167
Permanent Capacity 2,982
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,876
Utilization (by enrollment) 96% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 2,606 376
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 87%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,715 267 Perm Buildings 417,702 31.3%
2010-11 In Migration 505 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 231 Administration 1 1988 14,688 15.9%
Building B 1 1988 261,135 23.9%
Site Data Greenhouse 1 1988 634 15.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 66.0 Greenhouse 1 1988 913 11.1%
Parking Spaces 678 Vocational 1 1988 27,588 50.2%
Mechanical 1 1988 5,462 47.5%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1988 107,282 18.7%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $36,278 $13,022 - - $49,300 Repair priorities 1 & 2 -
$16,387,318*
Roofing - $4,399 - $483 - $4,882
Structural - - $52,083 $25,949 - $78,032
Exterior - $1,999 $89,170 $101,542 - $192,711
Interior - $30,929 $2,757,279 $3,016,216 - $5,804,424
Mechanical - $12,273,635 $4,660,249 - - $16,933,885
Electrical - $467,936 $613,437 $21,465 - $1,102,839
Plumbing - - $1,588,886 $160,177 - $1,749,063
Fire & Life Safety $607,200 $366,573 $101,563 - - $1,075,335
Technology - $329,391 $2,529,387 - - $2,858,778
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - $4,947 $551,033 $11,602,340 - $12,158,320
Other $535,544 $1,629,203 $19,318 - $884,595 $3,068,659
Total $1,142,743 $15,244,574 $12,975,427 $14,928,171 $884,595 $45,175,511
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

013
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bowie HS

Page 142
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

008 Crockett High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)

5601 Manchaca Road Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1969 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 335,087 10,752 345,839
Area (GSF) per student 199 6 205
Number of Classrooms 103 13 116
Permanent Capacity 2,163
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,686
Utilization (by enrollment) 78% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,883 280
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 87%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,026 137 Perm Buildings 335,087 30.5%
2010-11 In Migration 285 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 510 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1969 322,158 28.7%
Theatre 1 1988 12,929 48.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 39.5
Parking Spaces 666

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $4,218 $9,966 $999,378 $199,650 - $1,213,212 Repair priorities 1 & 2 -
$12,571,584*
Roofing - - $212,664 $1,263,126 - $1,475,790
Structural - $5,402 - - - $5,402
Exterior - $3,931 $460,633 - - $464,564
Interior - $110,354 $2,135,857 $90,119 - $2,336,330
Mechanical $193,260 $7,594,793 $5,595,876 - - $13,383,929
Electrical - $139,476 $4,322,064 $112,680 - $4,574,220
Plumbing $86,955 $1,894,088 $2,707,524 $146,206 - $4,834,773
Fire & Life Safety $480,657 $324,155 $61,394 - - $866,207
Technology - $231,149 $1,881,006 - - $2,112,155
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $250,847 $1,031,862 - $1,282,709
Other $1,057,058 $386,480 - - $186,183 $1,629,721
Total $1,822,148 $10,749,436 $18,627,243 $2,843,643 $186,183 $34,228,652
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

008
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Crockett HS

Page 143
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
1012 Arthur Stiles Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Te 78721 0 NR No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 267,140 2,976 270,116
Area (GSF) per student 299 3 302
Number of Classrooms 79 2 81
Permanent Capacity 1,548
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 894
Utilization (by enrollment) 58% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,249 299
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 81%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,354 194 Perm Buildings 267,140 25.6%
2010-11 In Migration 125 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 955 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1960 205,285 29.9%
Theatre 1 1986 10,851 34.5%
Site Data Classroom 1 1986 24,940 7.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 27.6 Mechanical 1 1998 248
Parking Spaces 228 Green Tech 1 1998 25,816 1.6%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $608 - $259,355 - - $259,963 Repair priorities 1 & 2 -
$15,087,028*
Roofing - $70,262 $2,983,943 - - $3,054,205
Structural - - - $1,946 - $1,946
Exterior - $3,456,001 $301,327 $4,120 - $3,761,448
Interior $334 $176,082 $316,049 $31,050 - $523,515
Mechanical $51,875 $1,067,064 $37,306 - - $1,156,245
Electrical - $4,288,045 $332,662 $162,664 - $4,783,370
Plumbing $2,404,889 $2,193,334 $119,797 $76,745 - $4,794,766
Fire & Life Safety $343,950 $148,014 $38,970 - - $530,934
Technology - $122,906 $1,313,795 - - $1,436,701
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties $271 - $864,657 $374,364 - $1,239,291
Other $386,864 $277,245 - - $213,544 $877,654
Total $3,188,792 $11,898,236 $6,567,860 $650,888 $213,544 $22,519,320
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

019
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC)

Page 144
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

015 Garza Independence High School Grades Served 11-12 (HS)

1600 Chicon Street Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1939 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 44,754 9,480 54,234
Area (GSF) per student 172 36 209
Number of Classrooms 18 8 26
Permanent Capacity 378
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 260
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 378
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 378 Perm Buildings 44,754 28.9%
2010-11 In Migration 251 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1939 32,530 35.5%
Building B 1 1965 11,435 11.5%
Site Data Mechanical 1 1939 493 0.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.1 Building D 1 1939 48
Parking Spaces 36 Building E 1 1939 248

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $33,901 $38,624 $40,134 - $112,659 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,702,408*
Roofing - $1,033,698 - - - $1,033,698
Structural - - $942 - - $942
Exterior - - $252,129 - - $252,129
Interior - $240,448 $223,257 $146,780 - $610,485
Mechanical $199,108 $296,459 $51,405 - - $546,972
Electrical - $223,161 $649,189 $67,527 - $939,876
Plumbing $2,638 - $282,904 $26,530 - $312,073
Fire & Life Safety $144,862 $66,414 $10,469 - - $221,745
Technology - $60,658 $310,505 - - $371,163
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $31,488 $235,513 - $267,002
Other $383,919 $17,142 - - $198,632 $599,694
Total $730,527 $1,971,881 $1,850,912 $516,483 $198,632 $5,268,436
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

015
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Garza Independence HS

Page 145
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

004 Lanier High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)

1201 Payton Gin Rd Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78758 0 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 262,640 19,978 282,618
Area (GSF) per student 162 12 174
Number of Classrooms 83 26 109
Permanent Capacity 1,627
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,624
Utilization (by enrollment) 100% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,981 -354
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 122%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,242 -615 Perm Buildings 262,640 21.4%
2010-11 In Migration 121 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 557 Building A 1 1966 134,966 26.6%
Theatre 1 1988 16,226
Site Data Gymnasium 1 1966 49,133 18.7%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 28.5 Vocational 1 1988 17,918 26.5%
Parking Spaces 329 Mechanical 1 1966 4,680 79.8%
Greenhouse 1 1966 922 17.0%
Greenhouse 1 1968 922 17.0%
Greenhouse 1 1968 600 16.3%
Vocational 1 1966 23,968 8.3%
Classroom 1 2009 8,605 6.1%
Storage 1 2008 300
Storage 1 2008 4,000 0.0%
Storage 1 2008 280
Storage 1 2008 120

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $5,002 - $40 $26,586 - $31,628 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,908,934*
Roofing - $1,893,475 $1,389,414 - - $3,282,889
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $938,853 - - $938,853
Interior - $25,163 $1,406,682 $146,335 - $1,578,180
Mechanical $709,276 $912,774 $3,619,709 $240,758 - $5,482,517
Electrical - $224,289 $2,273,883 $155,096 - $2,653,268
Plumbing $10,801 $649,516 $649,896 $405,324 - $1,715,537
Fire & Life Safety $421,914 $318,665 $84,442 $53,927 - $878,948
Technology - $138,856 $1,479,163 - - $1,618,020
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - $162 $109,311 $610,386 - $719,858

004
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lanier HS

Page 146
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

Other $175,164 $324,594 - - $176,389 $676,147

Total $1,322,157 $4,586,776 $11,951,394 $1,638,411 $176,389 $19,675,128
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

004
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lanier HS

Page 147
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

014 Johnson (LBJ) High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)

7309 Lazy Creek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78724 1974 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 291,406 12,288 303,694
Area (GSF) per student 155 7 161
Number of Classrooms 94 15 109
Permanent Capacity 1,842
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,881
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,083 759
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 59%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,155 687 Perm Buildings 291,406 15.5%
2010-11 In Migration 167 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 239 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1974 275,266 15.7%
Theatre 1 2006 16,140 9.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.4
Parking Spaces 598

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $53,582 $104,860 - - $158,442 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $6,385,051*
Roofing - $2,932 $70,454 - - $73,386
Structural - - $122,523 - - $122,523
Exterior - - $18,350 $110,561 - $128,911
Interior - $128,130 $273,895 $1,143,379 - $1,545,403
Mechanical - $4,170,314 $1,228,562 - - $5,398,877
Electrical - - $2,383,711 $103,648 - $2,487,359
Plumbing $86,955 - $443,282 $67,050 - $597,288
Fire & Life Safety $396,356 $226,467 $77,941 - - $700,763
Technology - $217,495 $1,656,802 - - $1,874,297
Conveyances - $49,641 $238,429 - - $288,070
Specialties - - $307,899 $497,563 - $805,461
Other $599,423 $453,755 - - $96,326 $1,149,504
Total $1,082,734 $5,302,317 $6,926,707 $1,922,200 $96,326 $15,330,284
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

014
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Johnson (LBJ) HS

Page 148
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

005 McCallum High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)

5600 Sunshine Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78756 1953 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 242,667 16,896 259,563
Area (GSF) per student 133 9 142
Number of Classrooms 76 22 98
Permanent Capacity 1,596
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,824
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,316 280
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 82%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,434 162 Perm Buildings 242,667 19.8%
2010-11 In Migration 795 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 296 Building A 1 1953 184,032 23.4%
Mechanical 1 1953 2,364 10.8%
Site Data Theatre 1 1987 28,997 9.7%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 31.1 Gymnasium 1 1987 18,939 14.9%
Parking Spaces 301 Mechanical 1 1953 1,139
Storage 1 1993 3,732 0.0%
Storage 1 1978 464
Building H 1 2010 3,000 5.0%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $1,671 $1,673 - - $3,344 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,695,621*
Roofing $16,328 $2,055,562 $120,293 - - $2,192,184
Structural $149,521 - $2,468 - - $151,989
Exterior $9,259 $5,115 - - - $14,374
Interior $6,534 $252,666 $444,662 $37,302 - $741,164
Mechanical - $469,522 $6,859,945 $615,536 - $7,945,003
Electrical $26,177 $111,580 $684,807 $76,795 - $899,360
Plumbing - - $521,263 $104,347 - $625,610
Fire & Life Safety $382,481 $257,141 $52,833 - - $692,455
Technology - $207,162 $1,471,162 - - $1,678,325
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $357,122 $528,359 - $885,480
Other $299,502 $346,116 - - $2,262,115 $2,907,733
Total $889,802 $3,805,820 $10,516,228 $1,362,340 $2,262,115 $18,836,304
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

005
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
McCallum HS

Page 149
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

006 Reagan High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)

7104 Berkman Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 1965 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 249,609 3,072 252,681
Area (GSF) per student 277 3 280
Number of Classrooms 81 1 82
Permanent Capacity 1,588
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 901
Utilization (by enrollment) 57% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,552 36
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 98%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,769 -181 Perm Buildings 249,609 22.1%
2010-11 In Migration 080 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 779 Administration 1 1965 5,851 18.6%
Building B 1 1965 60,797 21.7%
Site Data Gymnasium 1 1965 47,562 16.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 31.8 Band 1 1965 2,982 9.8%
Parking Spaces 447 Vocational 1 1965 17,949 15.5%
Mechanical 1 1965 4,549 8.4%
Building G 1 1965 24,939 13.7%
Classroom 1 1967 42,718 10.4%
Vocational 1 1987 42,262 24.5%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $812,519 $2,292,227 - $3,104,746 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,923,203*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $16,637 - - $16,637
Interior - $42,710 $1,052,579 $65,128 - $1,160,417
Mechanical $79,120 $113,444 $3,936,964 $15,617 - $4,145,144
Electrical - $290,110 $3,174,735 $202,900 - $3,667,745
Plumbing $86,955 - $760,828 $41,511 - $889,295
Fire & Life Safety $363,053 $207,769 $47,598 - - $618,421
Technology - $161,834 $1,431,591 - - $1,593,425
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $804,179 $503,119 - $1,307,298
Other $679,181 $849,386 - - $348,003 $1,876,570
Total $1,208,310 $1,714,894 $12,037,630 $3,120,501 $348,003 $18,429,338
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

006
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Reagan HS

Page 150
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

007 Travis High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)

1211 E. Oltorf Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1953 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 285,098 9,696 294,794
Area (GSF) per student 201 7 208
Number of Classrooms 95 10 105
Permanent Capacity 1,862
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,420
Utilization (by enrollment) 76% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,902 -40
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,087 -225 Perm Buildings 285,098 30.0%
2010-11 In Migration 147 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 677 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1953 224,722 31.3%
Gymnasium 1 1953 47,962 22.1%
Site Data Vocational 1 1975 8,049 26.6%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 34.8 Mechanical 1 1971 492 22.5%
Parking Spaces 451 Mechanical 1 1953 2,273 33.9%
Mechanical 1 1975 1,600 29.0%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $8,435 $358,112 $485,606 - - $852,153 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,962,889*
Roofing - $10,286 $681,548 $575,445 - $1,267,279
Structural - $4,163 $22,830 - - $26,993
Exterior - $34,640 $1,142,699 $35,140 - $1,212,479
Interior - $32,033 $1,355,675 $436,067 - $1,823,774
Mechanical $119,848 $575,471 $13,203,202 - - $13,898,521
Electrical - - $3,721,040 $150,106 - $3,871,146
Plumbing $221,287 - $1,296,050 $86,379 - $1,603,716
Fire & Life Safety $412,008 $358,380 $55,450 - - $825,838
Technology - $143,401 $1,700,776 - - $1,844,176
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $149,836 $559,681 - $709,518
Other $270,043 $315,501 - - $682,408 $1,267,952
Total $1,031,621 $1,931,268 $23,814,714 $1,842,818 $682,408 $29,302,829
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

007
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Travis HS

Page 151
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

852 Clifton Center Grades Served Alt. Ed. (Alt. Ed.)

1519 Coronado Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 1977 NR No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 39,039 1,536 40,575
Area (GSF) per student #Error n/a n/a
Number of Classrooms 12 1 13
Permanent Capacity 209
2010-11 Campus Enrollment n/a
Utilization (by enrollment) n/a Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 209
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 209 Perm Buildings 39,039 41.4%
2010-11 In Migration Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration Building A 1 1977 35,199 40.5%
Building B 1 1977 3,840 2.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.8
Parking Spaces 71

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $79,594 $88,237 $381,866 - $549,698 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,092,591*
Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $8,729 $7,897 - - $16,626
Interior - $21,355 $124,258 $116,858 - $262,472
Mechanical $14,094 $1,243,247 $893,990 - - $2,151,332
Electrical - - $868,543 $5,148 - $873,691
Plumbing - - $72,791 $57,050 - $129,841
Fire & Life Safety $54,766 $50,688 $8,983 - - $114,437
Technology - $59,277 $140,628 - - $199,905
Conveyances - $248,207 - - - $248,207
Specialties - - $380,249 $191,515 - $571,763
Other $200,538 $91,510 - - $36,615 $328,663
Total $269,399 $1,823,193 $2,585,577 $752,437 $36,615 $5,467,221
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

852
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Clifton Center

Page 152
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

012 Ridgeview ALC Grades Served 6-12 (Alt. Ed.)

901 Neal Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1953 NR Yes

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 88,677 9,216 97,893
Area (GSF) per student 657 68 725
Number of Classrooms 22 6 28
Permanent Capacity 462
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 135
Utilization (by enrollment) 29% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 462
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 462 Perm Buildings 88,677 38.7%
2010-11 In Migration 139 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1953 84,309 40.7%
Building B 1 1970 1,167 22.4%
Site Data Building C 1 1968 3,201 47.0%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.8
Parking Spaces 120

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $57,810 $40,134 - $97,944 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,750,293*
Roofing - - $1,468,016 - - $1,468,016
Structural - $21,088 $7,827 - - $28,915
Exterior - - $132,297 $1,000,183 - $1,132,480
Interior - - $318,518 $328,993 - $647,510
Mechanical $213,640 $693,247 $4,635,098 - - $5,541,985
Electrical - $156,212 $1,172,947 $3,406 - $1,332,565
Plumbing - - $577,119 $9,634 - $586,753
Fire & Life Safety $163,727 $107,266 $16,480 - - $287,473
Technology - $74,845 $378,576 - - $453,421
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $233,156 $99,651 - $332,807
Other $230,098 $90,170 - - $32,018 $352,286
Total $607,465 $1,142,828 $8,997,845 $1,481,999 $32,018 $12,262,155
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

012
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ridgeview ALC

Page 153
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

251 Rosedale School Grades Served Alt. Ed. (Alt. Ed.)

2117 W. 49th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78756 1939 NR No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 37,112 7,680 44,792
Area (GSF) per student 228 47 275
Number of Classrooms 18 5 23
Permanent Capacity 314
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 163
Utilization (by enrollment) 52% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 314
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 314 Perm Buildings 37,112 32.1%
2010-11 In Migration 158 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1939 35,994 32.2%
Building B 1 1939 460 8.5%
Site Data Building C 1 1940 658 15.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 4.9
Parking Spaces 43

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $342,217 $40,134 - $382,351 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,066,381*
Roofing - - $20,585 - - $20,585
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $7,439 $3,845 $539,718 $5,265 - $556,266
Interior - - $242,360 $73,485 - $315,845
Mechanical - $58,248 $1,495,485 - - $1,553,733
Electrical - $191,593 $223,515 $27,644 - $442,752
Plumbing $262,464 - $176,849 $32,233 - $471,546
Fire & Life Safety $79,199 $50,972 - - - $130,171
Technology - $58,809 $230,056 - - $288,865
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $55,191 $72,979 - $128,170
Other $120,098 $134,431 - - $68,255 $322,784
Total $469,200 $597,181 $3,325,976 $251,739 $68,255 $4,712,351
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

251
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Rosedale

Page 154
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

252 Baker Center Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 65,868
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building A 1 1911 63,810 16.7%
Building B 1 1952 1,600
Building C 1 1911 458 105.5%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $48,529 - - $48,529
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $9,828 - - $9,828
Exterior - - $460,754 - - $460,754
Interior $25,137 $14,887 $96,850 - - $136,875
Mechanical $174,525 $1,546,744 $133,115 - - $1,854,384
Electrical - - $254,525 - - $254,525
Plumbing - - $153,424 - - $153,424
Fire & Life Safety $82,553 $47,900 - - - $130,453
Technology - $65,935 $59,028 - - $124,963
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - - - - $0
Other - - - - $202,910 $202,910
Total $282,216 $1,675,465 $1,216,053 $0 $202,910 $3,376,645

252
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Baker Center

Page 155
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

951 Burger Athletic Complex Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 180,613
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building A 1 1977 70,370 39.7%
Restroom 1 1977 5,832 9.7%
Concession 1 1977 4,927 0.9%
Restroom 1 1977 5,839 1.4%
Ticket Booth 1 1977 142 23.4%
Restroom 1 1977 5,839 2.4%
Concession 1 1977 4,927 0.9%
Restroom 1 1977 5,832 1.1%
Ticket Booth 1 1977 142 23.4%
Ticket Booth 1 1977 59
Press Box 1 1977 12,255 2.2%
Ticket Booth 1 1977 59 77.8%
Building M 1 1977 31,119 0.6%
Building N 1 1977 31,266 6.6%
Press Box 1 1977 2,005

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $2,779,986 - - $2,779,986
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $1,460 $35,546 - $37,005
Interior - - $115,126 - - $115,126
Mechanical - $6,914,460 $257,795 - - $7,172,255
Electrical - $71,969 $74,588 - - $146,556
Plumbing - - $253,154 - - $253,154
Fire & Life Safety $226,365 $18,870 - - - $245,235
Technology - $94,415 - - - $94,415
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties $255 - - - - $255

951
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Burger Athletic Complex

Page 156
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

Other $962,809 $48,068 - - $42,012 $1,052,889

Total $1,189,429 $7,147,782 $3,482,107 $35,546 $42,012 $11,896,876

951
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Burger Athletic Complex

Page 157
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

941 Carruth Administration Center Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 133,989
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building A 1 1991 61,310 15.6%
Building B 1 1991 21,687 19.3%
Building C 1 1991 11,821 21.6%
Building D 1 1991 15,948 22.1%
Building E 1 1991 17,216 14.4%
Parking 1 1991 6,007 32.0%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $10,702 - - $10,702
Roofing - $3,992 $11,352 - - $15,344
Structural - $4,340 - - - $4,340
Exterior - $62,417 $7,731 - - $70,148
Interior - - $228,761 $80,035 - $308,797
Mechanical - $435,423 $3,686,340 - - $4,121,762
Electrical $12,316 $191,396 $1,110,222 - - $1,313,934
Plumbing - - $272,701 $188,256 - $460,957
Fire & Life Safety $167,931 $114,175 - - - $282,106
Technology - $82,843 $120,077 - - $202,919
Conveyances - $8,858 - - - $8,858
Specialties - - - - - $0
Other - - - - - $0
Total $180,247 $903,444 $5,447,886 $268,291 $0 $6,799,867

941
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Carruth Administration Center

Page 158
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

922 Central Warehouse Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 96,303
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Warehouse 1 1983 96,303 5.1%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $24,499 - - $24,499
Roofing $6,369 - - - - $6,369
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $5,297 $4,407 $96,762 - - $106,465
Interior - - $18,684 - - $18,684
Mechanical $122,115 $23,850 - - - $145,964
Electrical - $250,372 $373,350 - - $623,723
Plumbing - - $25,442 - - $25,442
Fire & Life Safety $120,698 $63,963 - - - $184,661
Technology - $61,092 $86,304 - - $147,397
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $100,831 - - $100,831
Other $14,187 - - - $11,195 $25,381
Total $268,665 $403,684 $725,872 $0 $11,195 $1,409,416

922
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Central Warehouse

Page 159
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

949 Delco Activity Center Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 60,294
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building A 1 2003 60,294 3.4%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $24,018 - - - $24,018
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - $73,564 - - - $73,564
Exterior - - $231 $10,355 - $10,585
Interior - $1,324 $1,030 - - $2,354
Mechanical - $32,431 $120,555 - - $152,987
Electrical $32,980 - - - - $32,980
Plumbing - - - - - $0
Fire & Life Safety $90,397 $34,099 - - - $124,496
Technology - $39,758 - - - $39,758
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - - - - $0
Other $136,246 $48,763 - - - $185,009
Total $259,623 $253,956 $121,816 $10,355 $0 $645,750

949
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Delco Activity Center

Page 160
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

948 House Park Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 32,070
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building A 1 1940 3,325
Building B 1 1986 2,106
Building C 1 1940 213
Building D 1 1940 254
Building E 1 1963 358
Building F 1 1940 96 17.9%
Building G 1 2000 64
Building H 1 1963 240 94.4%
Building I 1 1940 215
Building J 1 1940 249
Building K 1 1939 12,473 1.0%
Building L 1 1936 11,331 0.8%
Building M 1 1938 573 11.2%
Building N 1 1938 573 11.2%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $653,465 - - $653,465
Roofing - - $1,596 - - $1,596
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $36,134 $5,870 - - - $42,005
Interior - - $4,162 - - $4,162
Mechanical - $31,411 - - - $31,411
Electrical - - $17,520 - - $17,520
Plumbing - - $7,805 - - $7,805
Fire & Life Safety - - - - - $0
Technology - $32,753 - - - $32,753
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - - - - $0
Other $101,092 - - - $157,489 $258,581
Total $137,227 $70,034 $684,548 $0 $157,489 $1,049,297

948
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
House Park

Page 161
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

959 Nelson Field Bus Terminal Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 13,093
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building A 1 1995 13,093 4.9%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $58,975 - - - - $58,975
Roofing - - $12,467 - - $12,467
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $26,055 - - $26,055
Interior - $21,355 $3,908 - - $25,263
Mechanical - $61,039 $17,529 - - $78,569
Electrical - - - - - $0
Plumbing - - - - - $0
Fire & Life Safety $3,560 $20,127 - - - $23,687
Technology - $40,439 - - - $40,439
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - $9,220 - - - $9,220
Other $7,663 - - - $24,167 $31,830
Total $70,197 $152,181 $59,959 $0 $24,167 $306,504

959
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Nelson Field Bus Terminal

Page 162
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

281 Nelson Field Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 59,005
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Administration 1 1963 2,880 47.3%
Restroom 1 1963 374 59.6%
Concession 1 1963 796 93.5%
Restroom 1 1963 320 48.2%
Restroom 1 1963 320 58.7%
Restroom 1 1963 374 59.2%
Concession 1 1963 796 7.5%
Restroom 1 1963 320 51.8%
Restroom 1 1963 320 56.7%
Storage 1 1963 800 19.9%
Ticket Booth 1 1963 64
Building L 1 1963 80 29.8%
Ticket Booth 1 1963 64
Building N 1 1963 21,773 0.6%
Building O 1 1963 19,455 0.0%
Building P 1 1963 10,269 2.0%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $740,737 - - $740,737
Roofing - $14,226 - - - $14,226
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $100,568 - - $100,568
Interior - - $75,565 - - $75,565
Mechanical - - $147,102 - - $147,102
Electrical - - $121,639 - - $121,639
Plumbing - - $255,724 - - $255,724
Fire & Life Safety - - - - - $0
Technology - - - - - $0
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - - - - $0

281
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Nelson Field

Page 163
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

Other $422,773 $241,232 - - $91,966 $755,971

Total $422,773 $255,458 $1,441,334 $0 $91,966 $2,211,531

281
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Nelson Field

Page 164
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

950 Noack Sports Complex Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 3,232
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Restroom 1 2004 1,242 0.4%
Concession 1 2004 1,520 4.1%
Press Box 1 2004 101
Press Box 1 2004 101
Ticket Booth 1 2004 76
Press Box 1 2004 96
Press Box 1 2004 96

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - - - $0
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - - - - - $0
Mechanical - - - - - $0
Electrical - - - - - $0
Plumbing - - - - - $0
Fire & Life Safety - - - - - $0
Technology - - - - - $0
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - - - - $0
Other $126,224 - - - - $126,224
Total $126,224 $0 $0 $0 $0 $126,224

950
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Noack Sports Complex

Page 165
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

942 Pleasant Hill Annex Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 25,759
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building A 1 1936 22,310 36.2%
Building B 1 1957 3,290 54.0%
Building C 1 1987 159 5.3%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $17,409 $20,813 - $38,222
Roofing $3,042 - $888,035 - - $891,077
Structural - $4,969 - - - $4,969
Exterior - - $1,016,733 - - $1,016,733
Interior - - $85,623 $73,776 - $159,398
Mechanical - $20,497 $84,743 - - $105,240
Electrical - $155,294 $59,367 - - $214,661
Plumbing $248,059 - $85,108 - - $333,166
Fire & Life Safety - - - - - $0
Technology - - - - - $0
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $21,742 - - $21,742
Other $18,918 - - - - $18,918
Total $270,019 $180,761 $2,258,760 $94,588 $0 $2,804,127

942
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pleasant Hill Annex

Page 166
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

960 Saegert Transportation Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 26,916
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building A 1 1975 12,219 35.1%
Building B 1 1975 2,660
Building C 1 1975 137
Building D 1 1975 11,900

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $607,498 - - $607,498
Roofing $12,467 - $479,127 - - $491,594
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $153,989 $102,047 - $256,036
Interior - $77,872 $68,333 - - $146,205
Mechanical $77,097 $2,690 $19,539 - - $99,326
Electrical - $44,212 $49,909 - - $94,121
Plumbing - - $5,124 $68,136 - $73,261
Fire & Life Safety $18,874 $20,127 - - - $39,001
Technology - $40,222 - - - $40,222
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $3,397 - - $3,397
Other $20,001 - - - $28,659 $48,661
Total $128,439 $185,122 $1,386,917 $170,184 $28,659 $1,899,321

960
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Saegert Transportation

Page 167
District-wide Facility Master Plan - DRAFT 02/08/2011 Austin Independent School District
EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

962 Service Center - Building & Grounds Grades Served ()

School Data

Site Data

Building Data
Perm Buildings 54,307
Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
Building A 1 1991 27,435 15.3%
Building B 1 1991 11,219 6.9%
Building C 1 2000 6,602 4.8%
Building D 1 1995 848
Building E 1 2007 8,203

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan

Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $11,800 - - $11,800
Roofing - - $4,395 $8,920 - $13,315
Structural - - $33,741 - - $33,741
Exterior - $5,265 - $12,535 - $17,800
Interior - - $8,822 $22,790 - $31,612
Mechanical - $247,021 $600,307 - - $847,328
Electrical - $93,720 $88,086 - - $181,806
Plumbing - - - - - $0
Fire & Life Safety $68,063 $61,178 - - - $129,241
Technology - $50,669 $64,667 - - $115,336
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $46,404 - - $46,404
Other $102,465 - - - $135,726 $238,190
Total $170,528 $457,852 $858,222 $44,245 $135,726 $1,666,573

962
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Service Center - Bldg & Grds

Page 168
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Educational Framework

The following Educational Framework was used as a i. Campus layout and organization
planning tool to aid in decision making by the Facility j. Neighborhood accessibility
Master Plan Task Force. It was not a mandate, but a set k. Feeder pattern impact
of guidelines, and was intended to be flexible in order to 4) School Performance - The Board may
align resources that will provide optimal learning consider a campus intervention, including
environments for all AISD students. The guiding principle closure or repurposing, for schools that have
for teaching and learning, as set by the Board of Trustees, not met academic criteria established by
is performance-based empowerment and earned the District, state or federal accountability
autonomy. systems.
5) Facility Utilization
1. Planning Guidelines a. Facility condition
A. Priorities for Decision Making and Optimal b. Capacity
Learning Environments c. Enrollment
d. Economic efficiency
1) Safety and Security e. Intensity of use
2) Equitable Learning Opportunities for All
Students - Ensure that all facilities offer
Alternative Learning Education programs
and are in full compliance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
3) Quality Facility Conditions
a. Physical condition and safety
b. Support for academic programs
c. Indoor-air quality – e.g. proper
ventilation, monitoring of indoor pollutants
d. Natural lighting
e. Environmental condition
f. Green Building concepts – e.g. energy,
water and materials efficiency
g. Application of current and emerging
technology – e.g. wireless networks
h. Site acreage

Page 169

District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
B. Facility Utilization Alternatives
1) Portable/Temporary Classrooms – The
Facility Master Plan seeks to reduce the
number of portable/temporary classrooms.
When additional classrooms are needed
and are anticipated to be needed over
time, the Facility Master Plan will include
plans to replace portable/temporary
buildings with permanent buildings.
2) Shared Use of Facilities – The AISD Facility
Master Plan will, wherever possible, provide
access to school facilities for outside
programs in order to create and promote
successful community-school partnerships.
C. School Closure, Consolidation and Boundaries –
The AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force will
consider recommending options for adjusting
boundaries and the consolidation or repurposing
of schools to balance enrollment with capacity,
to ensure an optimal learning environment for all
students, and to realize necessary economic
efficiencies. The AISD Facility Master Plan Task
Force will continue to consider criteria and
options for schools that are not successful in
providing adequate and/or equitable learning
environments.
1) Transfer Policy – When possible, reduce the
number of transfers to align with the efficient
use of facilities.
EXHIBIT "B"
2. Programmatic Considerations
A. School Size
1) The following school-size targets are
guidelines based on community input that,
fiscally, may be achievable only through
creative design concepts, such as multiple
schools sharing the same campus. It is
unlikely that every large school will reduce its
enrollment to match these specifications.
Therefore, it is necessary to exercise flexibility
with these general guideline, which should
also be applied to site-specific and/or
program-specific facilities. The utilization
target is 85% - 105%.
Elementary Schools 300-500 students
Middle Schools 600-800 students
High Schools 1,500-2,000 students
2) The following school size standards have
been utilized by AISD for construction of new
school facilities since the 1996 Bond Program.
Elementary Schools 720-800 students
Middle Schools 1,100 students
High Schools 2,200-2,400 students
B. Grade Configuration – The current AISD grade
configuration for each facility will remain.
Recommendations may be developed for
schools in which flexibility in configuration might
better meet student and neighborhood needs.
Page 170

District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
C. Student Assignment – When developing facility
options, student assignment would optimally be
based on the following:
Elementary Schools - Neighborhood Schools /
Vertical Alignment
Middle Schools - Neighborhood Schools/ Vertical
Alignment and Choice
(depending upon which option provides the
best level of consistency for students).
High Schools - Vertical Alignment and Choice
D. Transportation of Choice Students –
Transportation should not be provided to
students attending schools outside of their
attendance area by choice, with the exception
of those opting for choice due to No Child Left
Behind or for those students whose applications
have been approved for enrollment in a
Magnet School (Open Enrollment Signature
Program).
E. Fine Arts - The AISD Facility Master Plan Task
Force will seek opportunities to support
increasing and enhancing the availability and
quality of Fine Arts programs.
F. Vertical Team Signature Programs – The AISD
Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek
opportunities to support increasing and
enhancing the availability and quality of
Signature Programs, which are offered in each
school and/or vertical team. These programs are
interest-based, and transportation is not
EXHIBIT "B"
provided by the District [e.g. International
Baccalaureate, Global Studies, Early College
High School, Early College Start, etc.].
G. Magnet Schools (Open Enrollment Signature
Programs) - The AISD Facility Master Plan Task
Force will seek opportunities to support
increasing and enhancing the availability and
quality of Magnet Schools that offer a
specialized curriculum that draws students
across boundaries, requires an application, and
transportation is provided [e.g., LASA, Kealing,
Fulmore, Ann Richards]. The Facility Master Plan
Task Force will utilize community input to assist
the District in developing other categories, if
needed, for programs that do not fit existing
definitions and criteria.
H. Athletic Programs - The AISD Facility Master Plan
Task Force will seek opportunities to support
increasing and enhancing the availability and
quality of athletic programs and facilities. The
plan will also address the facilities that receive
more frequent and intensive use.
I. Career and Technical Programs - The AISD
Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek
opportunities to support increasing and
enhancing the availability and quality of Career
and Technical Programs [e.g., Cosmetology,
Culinary Arts, etc.].
J. Pre-Kindergarten/Early Childhood Programs –
Pre-K and early childhood services should be
Page 171
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

expanded to the greatest extent that is

economically feasible to serve all children of the
community.

K. Student Services – The AISD Facility Master Plan

Task Force will seek opportunities to provide
space for student services based on the
demographic and economic needs of the
student population.

L. Administrative Spaces - Administrative buildings

and spaces will be reviewed and
recommendations developed as part of the
comprehensive Facility Master Plan.

Page 172
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Enrollment Projections

Historical Enrollment Historical Enrollment – By Grade Level

The Austin Independent School District has
experienced a significant increase in enrollment, over
7,500 students, during the past nine years. Since 2002-
03, student enrollment has increased by an average
of approximately 835 students, or 11% each year. The
current school year, 2010-11, had a notable increase
of an additional 933 students. Specifically, enrollment
increased by 610 elementary, 246 middle, and 54
high school students.
The Austin Independent School District experienced
growth from 2002-03 to 2010-11 in all grade levels.
Enrollment in grades Pre-K - 5 increased by a total of
7,233 students. Enrollment in grades 6 - 8 increased by a
total of 88 students. Enrollment in grades 9-12 increased
by a total of 199 students. The graph below and the
chart on the following page indicate enrollment by
grade over the past nine years.

The graph below illustrates the progression of

enrollment changes by year.

AISD Historic Enrollment AISD Historic Enrollment

2002-03 to 2010-2011 by Grade Level
100,000
2002-03 to 2010-11
90,000 60,000
80,000
70,000 50,000
60,000 40,000
50,000
40,000 30,000 PK-5
30,000 20,000
20,000 6-8
10,000 10,000
"9-12"
0 0

Source: AISD Office of Facilities Source: AISD Office of Facilities

Page 173
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Historical Enrollment – By Grade Level

The following chart depicts the progression of increasing enrollment throughout the previous nine years.

Austin Independent School District

Historical Enrollment
2002-03 to 2010-2011
Grade 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
EC & PreK 4,421 4,704 5,125 4,943 4,933 5,053 5,044 5,406 5,564
Kindergarten 6,431 6,728 6,849 7,462 7,309 7,391 7,589 7,668 7,660
1 6,405 6,512 6,898 7,055 7,493 7,297 7,498 7,543 7,644
2 6,115 6,235 6,373 6,669 6,898 7,107 7,027 7,354 7,225
3 6,104 6,013 6,174 6,278 6,571 6,617 6,856 6,796 7,102
4 5,866 5,912 5,897 6,073 6,136 6,254 6,477 6,595 6,679
5 5,592 5,754 5,676 5,823 5,870 5,847 6,028 6,195 6,293
Subtotal PK-5 40,934 41,858 42,992 44,303 45,210 45,566 46,519 47,557 48,167
6 5,582 5,390 5,517 5,379 5,511 5,506 5,519 5,568 5,740
7 5,655 5,517 5,278 5,443 5,344 5,300 5,421 5,425 5,513
8 5,252 5,507 5,423 5,258 5,337 5,278 5,229 5,338 5,324
Subtotal 6-8 16,489 16,414 16,218 16,080 16,192 16,084 16,169 16,331 16,577
9 6,764 6,371 6,512 6,332 6,313 6,371 6,366 6,252 6,127
10 5,093 5,321 4,962 5,337 5,183 5,043 5,084 5,148 5,212
11 4,427 4,389 4,694 4,423 4,576 4,588 4,569 4,644 4,724
12 4,179 4,048 4,126 4,368 4,118 4,590 4,511 4,564 4,599
Subtotal 9-12 20,463 20,129 20,294 20,460 20,190 20,592 20,530 20,608 20,662
Separate Campuses 318 239 271 339 350 329 337 311 332
Special Campuses 207 119 121 113 121 168 175 189 191
Subtotal Sep & Spec 525 358 392 452 471 497 512 500 523
Total 78,411 78,759 79,896 81,295 82,063 82,739 83,730 84,996 85,929
Source: AISD Office of Facilities

Page 174
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Historical Enrollment by School

Elementary Schools

Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Allan E S 464 494 492 470 441 436 426 446 398 389 392 379
Allison E S 480 485 480 452 467 486 484 509 500 520 520 543
Andrews E S 654 652 601 609 581 586 586 615 611 630 573 717
Baldwin E S 508
Baranoff E S 647 698 777 759 812 782 822 771 788 849 856 876
Barrington E S 660 670 655 703 693 778 746 752 821 866 929 996
Barton Hills E S 402 362 330 319 343 339 354 360 360 374 375 386
Becker E S 307 281 250 257 253 256 265 232 215 214 194 208
Blackshear E S 449 417 378 317 357 309 326 277 272 264 239 244
Blanton E S 824 701 635 668 622 619 608 563 564 547 555 591
Blazier E S - - - - - - - - 445 596 720 775
Boone E S 728 673 627 587 559 561 575 553 538 568 502 501
Brentwood E S 503 468 436 414 405 389 367 413 433 447 476 495
Brooke E S 412 374 360 291 281 337 372 352 344 410 423 439
Brown E S 606 651 534 589 548 550 508 517 508 519 506 519
Bryker Woods E S 394 422 403 369 371 376 397 427 395 401 398 404
Campbell E S 655 646 638 550 498 428 414 400 350 378 396 360
Casey E S 565 641 768 858 959 937 955 914 754 665 663 669
Casis E S 725 667 626 647 681 677 700 743 780 831 818 825
Clayton E S - - - - - - - 599 811 996 974 867
Cook E S 1,022 719 713 791 823 903 953 811 845 892 906 901
Cowan E S - 393 457 458 500 512 529 557 649 707 741 783
Cunningham E S 638 581 613 634 611 581 609 544 538 536 550 512
Davis E S 638 618 588 587 644 631 673 671 619 623 694 683
Dawson E S 464 447 469 415 420 381 362 371 362 335 335 331
Doss E S 666 667 652 659 669 623 627 645 659 677 719 768
Galindo E S 749 759 730 715 771 771 790 740 744 727 717 704
Govalle E S 630 562 459 480 438 440 416 391 383 419 394 415
Graham E S 619 586 573 666 633 713 676 698 678 633 658 761
Gullett E S 455 440 423 432 466 457 460 447 464 481 537 541
Harris E S 970 931 647 587 589 612 684 716 689 694 740 758
Hart E S 652 641 599 613 662 749 923 891 803 835 849 898
Highland Park E S 559 536 529 506 501 493 518 530 557 601 632 662
Hill E S 772 683 703 701 737 737 740 730 665 701 689 732
Houston E S 915 814 839 850 863 872 897 942 923 936 949 917
Jordan E S 725 763 800 696 629 624 622 690 619 743 814 833
Joslin E S 401 383 394 413 400 377 346 355 350 332 326 363
Kiker E S 1,058 771 720 753 836 881 993 711 697 717 904 933

Page 175
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Elementary Schools cont.

Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Kocurek E S 741 650 623 579 588 606 682 682 654 678 644 660
Langford E S 819 855 824 850 828 901 999 835 859 844 841 834
Lee E S 371 367 395 359 375 374 383 411 401 406 440 428
Linder E S 621 663 724 853 862 1,000 819 874 931 879 842 892
Maplewood E S 370 316 331 313 324 342 348 332 346 373 428 406
Mathews E S 372 326 345 391 386 409 393 432 418 417 392 405
McBee E S - 558 601 638 707 777 822 650 704 758 785 765
Menchaca E S 426 543 598 638 664 715 809 898 678 626 698 686
Metz E S 662 632 658 602 518 542 661 668 592 553 492 498
Mills E S 697 761 815 819 860 912 953 893 974 1,061 1,100 928
Norman E S 512 547 504 553 571 598 578 586 397 372 326 333
Oak Hill E S 812 781 762 763 814 837 837 896 926 950 1,008 772
Oak Springs E S 409 412 383 363 342 289 283 284 317 313 311 274
Odom E S 751 741 782 768 746 763 776 785 761 711 688 658
Ortega E S 365 357 360 300 290 277 283 280 253 254 286 296
Overton E S - - - - - - - - 543 647 715 668
Palm E S 628 652 622 693 830 886 991 725 644 662 650 606
Patton E S 832 823 833 812 829 804 785 777 745 726 763 914
Pease E S 238 248 257 236 238 251 252 247 254 254 252 256
Pecan Springs E S 560 592 585 602 569 584 556 545 554 497 516 532
Perez E S - - - - - - - 655 742 705 805 886
Pickle E S - - 613 594 593 581 638 660 685 710 729 740
PillowE S 481 440 412 405 460 473 524 529 552 563 652 653
Pleasant Hill E S 561 525 504 515 532 585 624 655 587 623 632 619
Read E C E S - - - - - - - 364 559 549 477 509
Reilly E S 309 283 273 245 279 231 254 285 268 258 303 296
Ridgetop E S 259 257 239 208 248 230 238 199 211 201 191 219
Rodriguez E S 691 723 684 750 725 780 872 901 946 973 955 910
St E lmo E S 431 422 439 490 494 484 437 449 421 360 353 585
Sanchez E S 503 485 420 390 448 450 659 658 551 610 611 277
Sims E S 299 303 332 322 365 388 408 416 417 415 319 304
Summitt E S 631 622 596 639 585 629 601 576 559 701 750 854
Sunset Valley E S 584 592 564 516 506 505 481 437 435 448 463 451
Travis Heights E S 568 501 502 527 457 518 562 573 587 564 525 537
Walnut Creek E S 969 994 877 942 983 1,052 1,078 971 955 763 900 916
Widen E S 733 804 756 791 765 820 782 796 846 825 794 769
Williams E S 709 651 637 606 645 624 616 620 627 694 664 642
Winn E S 586 604 629 665 635 621 671 672 514 432 441 463
Wooldridge E S 1,062 748 754 718 773 821 806 946 833 841 888 878
Wooten E S 632 640 613 593 588 578 603 638 633 682 688 695
Zavala E S 419 468 433 432 434 443 462 492 459 439 393 407
Zilker E S 421 433 440 496 511 541 480 451 478 495 524 522
E lementary Total 42,442 41,915 41,617 41,791 42,430 43,424 44,729 45,626 45,947 46,885 47,897 48740
Page 176
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Middle Schools
Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Bailey MS 1,529 1,217 1,173 1,144 1,099 1,074 1,134 1,175 1,147 1,206 959 1,041
Bedichek MS 1,136 1,004 998 889 904 908 912 1,039 1,150 1,119 1,018 1,054
Burnet MS 1,126 1,065 1,063 1,008 1,084 1,045 970 1,005 988 912 969 998
Covington MS 752 855 939 945 911 889 862 910 1,014 954 950 805
Dobie MS 874 913 921 763 746 739 808 849 517 566 603 630
Fulmore MS 764 749 872 957 992 1,054 1,037 1,029 1,045 1,036 1,007 995
Garcia MS - - - - - - - - 605 649 689 658
Gorzycki MS - - - - - - - - - - 835 963
Kealing MS 958 1,058 978 948 1,029 1,277 1,190 1,251 1,215 1,279 1,242 1,233
Lamar MS 915 855 798 779 791 701 675 671 741 780 668 604
Martin MS 495 622 632 648 736 738 676 702 760 744 691 639
Mendez MS 1,313 874 857 828 840 776 840 1,108 1,029 903 871 890
Murchison MS 1,236 1,232 1,240 1,213 1,210 1,227 1,257 1,216 1,156 1,156 1,254 1,281
O. Henry MS 681 743 866 887 885 801 747 789 881 982 1,005 1,026
Paredes MS - 959 1,060 1,208 1,227 1,292 1,330 1,067 989 957 899 930
Pearce MS 958 849 859 852 847 801 810 809 580 516 452 329
Richards ( 6-8) MS - - - - - - - - 224 334 362 378
Small MS 929 1,054 1,080 1,108 1,129 1,088 1,114 1,140 1,167 1,188 944 959
Webb MS 805 777 779 789 767 748 663 658 495 522 573 591

Middle School Total 14,471 14,826 15,115 14,966 15,197 15,158 15,025 15,418 15,703 15,803 15,991 16,004

Page 177
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

High Schools

Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Akins HS - 1,076 1,544 2,053 2,219 2,257 2,389 2,359 2,507 2,663 2,710 2,720
Anderson HS 1,804 1,742 1,763 1,959 1,959 1,997 2,121 2,013 2,093 2,096 2,000 2,089
Austin HS 2,167 2,014 2,136 2,149 2,158 2,245 2,207 2,124 2,240 2,343 2,390 2,337
Bowie HS 3,045 2,608 2,435 2,370 2,485 2,613 2,699 2,821 2,778 2,768 2,828 2,876
Crockett HS 2,529 2,414 2,174 2,099 1,999 1,962 2,038 1,992 1,907 1,857 1,763 1,686
E astside HS 1,826 1,479 1,359 1,008 975 1,068 775 760 691 556 679 718
Garza HS 318 339 384 347 307 266 280 308 315 301 258 260
International HS - - - - - - 258 264 185 202 230 176
LASA HS - - - - - - - - 858 860 874 881
LBJ HS 1,619 1,654 1,812 1,811 1,717 1,671 1,676 1,703 1,001 1,046 1,018 1,000
Lanier HS 1,855 1,762 1,666 1,915 1,794 1,793 1,674 1,619 1,693 1,608 1,594 1,624
McCallum HS 1,666 1,652 1,676 1,705 1,709 1,686 1,724 1,706 1,717 1,733 1,793 1,824
Reagan HS 1,405 1,394 1,276 1,304 1,169 1,064 1,029 989 973 988 958 901
Richards 9th and 10th - - - - - - - - - - 79 150
Travis HS 1,709 1,691 1,665 1,718 1,638 1,672 1,590 1,532 1,634 1,509 1,434 1,420

High School Total 19,943 19,825 19,890 20,438 20,129 20,294 20,460 20,190 20,592 20,530 20,608 20,662
Separate Campuses 102 44 311 318 239 271 339 350 329 337 311 332
Special Campuses 159 145 155 207 119 121 113 121 168 175 189 191

District Total 77,117 76,755 77,088 77,720 78,114 79,268 80,666 81,705 82,739 83,730 84,996 85,929

Page 178
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Birth Data

Historical birth data for the 31 zip codes comprising the

District was collected. The total number of live births for Austin Indep endent School Distr ict
this area has steadily increased from 1994 to 2008. In Live Births
1994, there were 9,175 births compared to 12,733 in 2008.
1994-2009
A slight decline of 45 births followed in 2009. The increase
in births points to continued growth at the elementary Year Births
school level. Live birth data is commonly used to predict 1994 9,175
future kindergarten enrollment. 1995 9,417
1996 9,650
1997 9,822
1998 10,329
Live Births by Year
in Zip Codes within AISD Boundaries 1999 10,829
14,000
2000 11,426
12,000 2001 11,346
10,000 2002 11,160
2003 11,270
8,000
2004 11,492
6,000 2005 11,383
4,000
2006 12,539
2007 12,744
2,000
2008 12,733
0 2009 12,688
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services & the
Dennis D. Harner and Associates Demographic Analysis &
E nrollment Projections, 2010
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services & the
Dennis D. Harner and Associates Demographic Analysis &
E nrollment Projections, 2010

Page 179
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Projected Enrollment Projected Enrollment – By Grade Level

In 2010, AISD commissioned Dennis D. Harner and Associates
to develop enrollment projections. According to this report,
the total projected enrollment for AISD is expected to
increase by 12,356 students, or 14.4%, from the 2010-11
school year to the 2020-21 school year.
The enrollment forecasts were calculated using a “cohort
survival” method. Each grade (cohort) is advanced from
one year to the next based upon historical trends. Live birth
data is also collected and used to compare the relationship
between kindergarten and enrollment five years later. A
cohort (grade) is advanced from one grade to the next
based upon historical trends. The number of live births, and
subsequently, the number of children, enrolled in
kindergarten, has steadily increased since 2002.
Projected enrollment for the 2011-12 through 2020-21 school
years shows a steady increase in enrollment in all grade
levels. At the elementary level, which reflects Pre-K through
Grade 5, the projected enrollment shows an increase of
5,225 students from the 2010-11 school year to the 2020-21
school year.
Similarly, the middle school enrollment, which reflects
Grades 6 through 8, shows an increase of 3,334 students. The
high school level, reflecting Grades 9 through 12, shows an
increase of 4,166 students during this same timeframe. The
table below shows projected enrollment by year and grade
level.

AISD Projected Enrollment

Mid-Range Total Projected by Grade Level
Enrollment 2011-12 to 2020-21
2011-12 to 2020-2021 60,000
120,000 50,000
100,000 40,000
80,000
30,000 PK-5
60,000
20,000 6-8
40,000
20,000 10,000 9-12
0 0

Source: Dennis D. Harner & Associates Demographic Analysis and Enrollment Projections, 2010

Page 180
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Projected Enrollment – By Grade Level

The following chart depicts the progression of increasing enrollment throughout the next ten years.

Austin Independent School District

Mid-Range Projected E nrollment
2010-11 to 2019-20
Grade 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
E C & PreK 5,368 5,419 5,471 5,524 5,575 5,628 5,679 5,731 5,782 5,834
Kindergarten 7,773 7,848 7,923 7,998 8,073 8,148 8,223 8,298 8,373 8,448
1 7,757 7,832 7,907 7,982 8,057 8,132 8,207 8,282 8,357 8,432
2 7,426 7,532 7,607 7,682 7,757 7,832 7,907 7,982 8,057 8,132
3 6,988 7,176 7,282 7,357 7,432 7,507 7,582 7,657 7,732 7,807
4 6,926 6,788 6,976 7,082 7,157 7,232 7,307 7,382 7,457 7,532
5 6,423 6,676 6,538 6,726 6,832 6,907 6,982 7,057 7,132 7,207
Subtotal PK-5 48,661 49,271 49,704 50,351 50,883 51,386 51,887 52,389 52,890 53,392
6 5,952 6,073 6,326 6,188 6,376 6,482 6,557 6,632 6,707 6,782
7 5,677 5,877 5,998 6,251 6,113 6,301 6,407 6,482 6,557 6,632
8 5,471 5,617 5,817 5,938 6,191 6,053 6,241 6,347 6,422 6,497
Subtotal 6-8 17,100 17,567 18,141 18,377 18,680 18,836 19,205 19,461 19,686 19,911
9 6,497 6,621 6,767 6,967 7,088 7,341 7,203 7,391 7,497 7,572
10 4,882 5,197 5,321 5,467 5,667 5,788 6,041 5,903 6,091 6,197
11 4,623 4,382 4,697 4,821 4,967 5,167 5,288 5,541 5,403 5,591
12 4,761 4,648 4,407 4,722 4,846 4,992 5,192 5,313 5,566 5,428
Subtotal 9-12 20,763 20,848 21,192 21,977 22,568 23,288 23,724 24,148 24,557 24,788
Total 86,524 87,686 89,037 90,705 92,131 93,510 94,816 95,998 97,133 98,091
Source: Dennis D. Harner & Associates Demographic Analysis and E nrollment Projections, 2010

Page 181

District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011
Capacity Analysis
How many students can a building accommodate? This
question often arises, and in the development of a
facility master plan, can be one of the most debated
issues. It is not uncommon to review an evaluation of an
existing building only to find that the capacity which was
once assigned to the building is considerably more than
what the building can reasonably accommodate today.
The main reason for this is that the programs in a public
school system and the manner in which they are
delivered have changed significantly since the building
was originally built. More than half the square footage in
AISD was built before 1985. Twenty-five years ago,
computer labs were just beginning to be incorporated
into schools, and severely handicapped students,
previously assigned to specialized facilities, were not yet
mainstreamed into public schools. In addition, state
legislation has mandated smaller student/teacher ratios.
In facility planning, the term design capacity is used to
describe simply counting the number of classrooms in a
building and multiplying by an average class size. Even
though at first glance this seems only to be common
sense, this methodology does not take into account the
programmatic implications of school facilities.
Age of AISD Permanent Buildings
Year Constructed Pre 1925 1925 - 1944
Total Square Feet 209,259 547,147
Building Count 5 33
EXHIBIT "B"
In AISD, functional capacity is reviewed on an annual
basis. Functional capacity is a more realistic analysis of
what a building can accommodate and takes into
account all special programs available at the school
that year, in addition to any portable buildings located
on site, to determine how many students can be
assigned to a particular school campus each school
year.
For master planning purposes, an updated methodology
to the former AISD permanent capacity methodology
was developed and applied. The formula for long-range
planning should reflect District programs, but should be
kept simple and equitable since programs change from
year to year while classroom square footages remain, for
the most part, the same. Permanent capacity does not
incorporate temporary or portable classrooms, but only
permanent space.
Elementary School Permanent Capacity
The elementary program is usually delivered based on
students being assigned to a home room and attending
special programs such as art, music, and physical
education in a specialized classroom. The number of
special classrooms required is reflective of the total
number of students enrolled and is subtracted from the
total number of classrooms since the vacated home
room cannot be utilized by other students.
1945 - 1964 1965 - 1984 1985 - 1994 1995 - 2004 2005 - 2010
3,083,806 3,481,972 2,363,533 1,616,514 1,026,591
90 77 65 59 33
Page 182
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

A 95% efficiency factor is applied since students do not
always arrive in perfect sets of 22 students. Additionally,
due to reduced class size and increased support space
needs for Title 1 schools, an 85% efficiency factor is
applied to compute permanent capacity at these
facilities.
The following describes the permanent capacity
methodology for elementary schools.
 Count permanent classrooms.
 Subtract special areas for music, art, etc. (3-7
classrooms based on staffing ratios).
 Multiply by 22 (average class size).
 Apply 95% efficiency factor; 85% efficiency factor
for Title 1 schools.
Secondary School Permanent Capacity
Unlike elementary schools, at the secondary level
students are not in self-contained environments but are
traveling from one location to another each period. All
classrooms are counted including the specialized
spaces. Since it is difficult to schedule every teaching
space every period of the day, in addition to the
movement to block scheduling, an efficiency factor of
75% is applied.
The following describes the permanent capacity
methodology for secondary schools.
 Count permanent classrooms.
 Multiply by 28 (average class size).
 Apply 75% efficiency factor; 70% efficiency factor
for Title 1 schools.
Core Capacity
Core capacity is defined as those spaces that large
groups of students utilize at some point during the school
day, including the cafeteria, gymnasium, and library. As
part of the new methodology, consideration was given
to lower permanent capacity if the cafeteria or
gymnasium was less than 85% of permanent capacity,
based on the number of classrooms.
The chart below shows the AISD standard for core space
sizes based on the current approved educational
standards.

Core Space Standards Cafeteria Gym Library

School Size Total Total Total
Grade Level (# of students) Square Feet SF/Student Square Feet SF/Student Square Feet SF/Student
Elementary 880 4,200 4.77 3,000 3.41 3,500 3.98
Middle 1,100 4,500 4.10 13,400 12.18 4,800 4.36
High 2,400 9,000 3.75 20,720 8.63 8,400 3.50
Source: AISD, Office of Facilities

Page 183
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Utilization

Utilization, or efficiency, of a school facility, is calculated

by dividing the enrollment of the school by its permanent
capacity. The target range as determined by the Facility
Master Plan Task Force for the purposes of long-range
planning is 85%-105%. Schools below 85% may be able to
provide relief for overcrowded schools or may be
considered as potential candidates for closure or
consolidation. Schools above 105% should be monitored
for additional growth, and schools that exceed 125% are
considered for additions or for relief through the
construction of new schools.

The chart below indicates that district-wide, AISD is within

the 85%-105% target range; however, by grade level, the
elementary schools are above the target and the middle
schools are below. In other words, the District is short
3,833 seats at the elementary level, but has 4,263 too
many at the middle school level.

2010 Permanent Utilization

Grade Level Enrollment Capacity Rate
Elementary 48,738 44,905 109%
Middle 16,154 20,417 79%
High 20,512 21,698 95%
Districtwide 85,404 87,020 98%
Source: AISD, Office of Facilities

On an individual basis, there are 29 schools, or 25% of all

school campuses, that fall below 85% of permanent
capacity. Fifty-three schools, or 46% of all school
campuses, operate at above 105%. The map to the right
and the ones on the following pages illustrate the 2010-11
school year enrollment utilization.

Page 184
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Page 185
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Enrollment versus Population

The population (number of students that live within an

attendance zone) is not always equal to the enrollment
(number of students that attend) of a school. No Child
Left Behind, transfer policies, and open enrollment
signature programs are some of the reasons students
migrate in and out of their assigned attendance zones.

In a few cases in AISD, students migrating into a school

comprise more than 40% of its enrollment. When large
numbers of students travel outside of the boundary of
their assigned school, to attend a different school, it
presents a challenge when planning for long-term facility
needs.

Because the number of students migrating in and out of

an attendance zone may vary year to year, it is
important to also look at the attendance zone
population. Population projections, which are derived
from birth data, census data, and housing stock analysis
are used in long-range planning efforts to identify trends
in growth and decline. Population projections are more
reliable than anticipating the rates of in and out
migration.

The following maps provide the 2010-11 population as a

percent of permanent capacity by school. This provides
a different picture than the enrollment utilization maps on
the preceding pages. For example, a school that falls
below the target utilization of 85% based on enrollment
may in fact be above 85% based on population.

Page 186
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Page 187
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Facility Condition Analysis Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify
buildings that need renovation, replacement or even
Facility condition is the state of repair of the building closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends,
infrastructure. Facility condition takes into consideration community sentiment, and the availability of capital are
all of the building systems from roofs and windows to additional factors that are analyzed when making school
electrical and mechanical systems. Although there is a facility decisions.
cost associated with renovating every building Cost of Repairs
according to current codes and standards, this does not = Facility Condition Index (FCI)
mean that all schools need massive and immediate Cost of Replacement
repairs and renovations. Rather, this provides an
understanding of the effort it would take to bring all The chart below indicates the distribution of campuses
facilities up to the same standard. by ranges of FCI in AISD. Please note that the support
facilities are included. Only one facility, Pease ES, falls
The facility condition information does provide the into the replace category; however, two schools, Zilker ES
following. and Wooten ES are between 50-59% and should be
 Comparative analysis of building conditions considered for major renovation or replacement.
 Approximate cost to address the facility conditions
FCI Campuses
of all buildings in the District
 Understanding of which buildings are in the worse <10% Repair 19
conditions and that might be slated for more
10-19% Renovate 32
immediate focus
20-29% 28
Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an 30-39% 35
index called the Facility Condition Index (FCI) to
40-49% 9
benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools.
This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a 50-59% 2
facility by the total cost to replace the facility. For 60-69% Replace -
example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might 70-79% 1
theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now
has $1 million in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by 80-89% -
$10 million results in an FCI of 10 percent. Industry 90-100% -
standards and financial modeling dictate that FCI >100% -
numbers above 65% or greater are more cost-effective
to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency gains Total 126
with more modern facilities and the value of the building
at the end of the analysis period.

Page 188
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

FCI: The Denominator

The denominator is the bottom part of the equation and Replacement Costs Cost/Sq.ft. Replacement Cost
possibly the easiest with which to start. The denominator
PreK Centers $ 297.47 $ 4,783,318
is the theoretical cost to replace the facility. It is
important to recognize that this cost is based on the Elementary School $ 297.47 $ 24,541,275

replacement of a building with another facility that is the Middle School $ 327.40 $ 55,658,000

same size and is fully code compliant. If, for example, High School $ 323.11 $ 106,626,300
you are comparing the FCI on a 3,450 square foot Alt. Ed. School $ 327.40 $ 6,548,000
gymnasium building at a campus, the replacement cost Admin $ 280.61 $ 5,612,200
is the theoretical cost to replace that same 3,450 square
Support $ 280.61 $ 5,612,200
foot building. Since the replacement cost comparison is
Maintenance - Transportation $ 280.61 $ 5,612,200
primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school,
middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of Portable Building $ 138.93 $ 213,396

cost models have been developed that estimate the

cost per square foot for new construction and are
indicated in the chart to the right. The cost models take
into account national industry averages from a
recognized industry data source called RSMeans®,
adjusted to Austin, Texas, as well as the District’s recent
experience in the Austin construction market. The costs
per square foot are then multiplied by the size of the
school or building under consideration.
FCI: The Numerator
The numerator is the estimated cost to complete the
repairs on the building in its current condition. This repair
cost is generally considered to be like-for-like repairs.
Within reason, the deficient conditions would be repaired
or systems replaced to put the building into fully
serviceable condition to meet current codes.
At AISD, the District retained a firm in 2007 to assess all of
the facilities in the district and develop cost estimates to
make needed repairs. That effort included an
assessment of all facilities using architectural and
engineering assessors to identify deficient conditions in
the buildings.
This survey focused, for the most part, on the condition of
the existing buildings and did not initially include
educational adequacy or functional equity needs. All of
the identified needs were grouped into building systems,
and a Uniformat® cost structure supported by RSMeans®
nationally-based cost data adjusted to the Austin, Texas
area, was employed to develop consistent cost
estimates across all schools. These cost estimates, using
the industry-standard, line- item costs, comprise the
majority of the costs in the AISD facility assessment
database and are included in the numerator of the FCI
calculation.
In addition, ADA (American with Disabilities Act)/TAS
(Texas Accessibility Standards) reports were developed
to address ADA issues against current guidelines during
2008-09. A functional equity study identified core areas
and specialized classroom areas, within specific school
campuses that did not meet AISD educational
specifications. The cost to resolve these issues has been
included in the deficiencies and numerator of the
current FCI numbers.
Page 189
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Educational Adequacy Assessment

As part of this master planning effort, AISD conducted an  Relationship of Spaces: Proximity of instructional
educational adequacy assessment of all schools. An spaces to support areas such as libraries, labs, and
educational adequacy assessment evaluates how well lecture halls.
the campus is equipped to deliver the instructional
program. The chart below identifies the educational adequacy
deficiency costs by the eight overall criteria.
During the summer of 2010, a team of assessors went to Technology, instructional aids, and security and
each school and collected an inventory of each space supervision make up the greatest need in terms of
at the classroom level. This data was then compared to educational adequacy.
the District developed standards to identify when an
individual space did not meet a specific level of
compliance. When an item did not meet the standard,
the condition was noted and a line item was added to Educational Adequacy Total
the assessment database with a budget to correct that
Capacity $ 1,476,141
condition.
Support for Programs $ 8,738,417
This applied a standards-based approach to determine Technology $ 74,371,610
the overall educational adequacy by evaluating eight
overall criteria as follows. Security and Supervision $ 34,273,456
 Capacity: Ability of the facility to meet the needs of Instructional Aids $ 53,308,580
the student population.
Learning Environment $ 3,862,200
 Support for Programs: Provision of special spaces or
classrooms to support the instructional program. Physical Characteristics $ 4,715,934
 Technology: Presence of infrastructure, data Relationship of Spaces $ 4,078,391
distribution, and equipment.
 Supervision & Security: Extent to which physical
configurations help or hinder building operation. Subtotal $ 184,824,729
 Instructional Aids: Presence of necessary equipment
within teaching spaces.
 Physical Characteristics: Sizes and shapes of
teaching spaces.
 Learning Environment: Degree to which learning
areas are comfortable, well-lit, odor-free,
controllable and quiet.

Page 190
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Building Deficiencies
The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over 41,000 line
items districtwide. Deficiencies are categorized by the following priorities.

Priority 1: currently critical (immediate need, i.e., fire safety systems)

Priority 2: potentially critical (to be corrected within one year, i.e., major HVAC equipment, security systems)
Priority 3: necessary/not yet critical (1-2 years, i.e., site lighting, sanitation sewer, educational adequacy)
Priority 4: recommended (3-5 years, i.e., finishes, educational adequacy)
Priority 5: does not meet current code/standards/grandfathered (i.e., functional equity, 3rd tier ADA/TAS)

The chart below lists the facility type and the costs associated with correcting priorities 1 through 5. Logically, the greatest
need is at the elementary schools since this makes up the largest number of schools and the most square footage in the
District.

Renovation Costs by Priority, by Campus

Type Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Total

Schools
PreK Centers $ 191,332 $ 1,073,643 $ 980,523 $ 154,414 $ 9,470 $ 2,409,383
Elementary Schools $ 36,850,040 $ 126,853,351 $ 240,721,823 $ 32,284,740 $ 70,573,429 $ 507,283,384
Middle Schools $ 19,139,713 $ 64,431,627 $ 84,687,913 $ 17,692,534 $ 40,887,549 $ 226,839,336
High Schools $ 15,986,074 $ 82,102,687 $ 134,128,848 $ 36,189,051 $ 21,192,236 $ 289,598,897
Alternative Education $ 1,346,064 $ 3,563,202 $ 14,909,398 $ 2,486,176 $ 136,888 $ 22,441,727

Total Schools $ 73,513,225 $ 278,024,510 $ 475,428,505 $ 88,806,914 $ 132,799,572 $ 1,048,572,726

Other District Facilities

Support Facilities $ 2,135,276 $ 7,727,230 $ 5,729,806 $ 45,901 $ 291,467 $ 15,929,679
Administrative $ 732,481 $ 2,759,670 $ 8,922,699 $ 362,880 $ 202,910 $ 12,980,639
Maintenance and Transportation
$ Facilities
637,830 $ 1,198,839 $ 3,030,970 $ 214,429 $ 199,746 $ 5,281,814

Total Other Facilities $ 3,505,587 $ 11,685,739 $ 17,683,474 $ 623,209 $ 694,123 $ 34,192,133

Grand Total $ 77,018,812 $ 289,710,249 $ 493,111,980 $ 89,430,123 $ 133,493,695 $ 1,082,764,859

Page 191
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

The chart below provides a crosstab by building system. The greatest building system deficiency, as is typically the case,
is in the area of Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC). Please note that the “Other” building system category
includes functional equity and ADA/TAS compliance.

District-wide Crosstab by Priority by System

Facility Condition Assessment Priority

Building System 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Site $ 471,675 $ 2,914,648 $ 20,346,691 $ 15,618,350 $ - $ 39,351,363

Roofing $ 1,899,480 $ 21,445,208 $ 21,855,335 $ 4,671,615 $ - $ 49,871,638
Exterior $ 192,501 $ 5,000,393 $ 21,363,122 $ 4,950,036 $ - $ 31,506,052
Structure $ 201,641 $ 389,747 $ 985,404 $ 66,195 $ - $ 1,642,988
Interior $ 130,752 $ 7,443,680 $ 44,907,605 $ 20,490,803 $ - $ 72,972,840
HVAC $ 13,061,988 $ 161,859,344 $ 150,114,352 $ 1,283,770 $ - $ 326,319,454
Plumbing $ 14,861,306 $ 8,129,887 $ 65,597,836 $ 3,829,778 $ 1,568 $ 92,420,375
Electrical $ 488,670 $ 24,917,566 $ 69,854,337 $ 5,273,377 $ - $ 100,533,950
Technology $ - $ 9,936,855 $ 77,335,604 $ - $ - $ 87,272,458
Fire and Safety $ 19,377,531 $ 11,607,150 $ 1,133,648 $ 507,425 $ - $ 32,625,754
Conveyances $ 223,695 $ 5,139,951 $ 247,287 $ - $ - $ 5,610,933
Specialties $ 39,820 $ 256,975 $ 19,351,440 $ 32,738,773 $ - $ 52,387,008
Other $ 26,069,754 $ 30,668,847 $ 19,318 $ - $ 133,492,127 $ 190,250,046

Total $ 77,018,812 $ 289,710,249 $ 493,111,980 $ 89,430,123 $ 133,493,695 $ 1,082,764,859

A summary of building system by priority by individual school campus is available in Appendix A of this report.

Page 192
 EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – DRAFT Working Document, 02/09/2011

Facility Options

Using the Educational Framework as guiding principles,
the Facility Master Plan Task Force began the
complicated task of developing facility options and
scenarios in order to meet their charge of developing
recommendations to improve facility efficiencies through
objective data analysis and community input.
Over the course of seven months, 108 options that were
developed by the Task Force, consultants, and staff,
were reviewed and evaluated by the Task Force.
An outline of the 108 options is provided in Appendix G of
this report.

The information and data considered included the

following.

 Current condition of buildings (FCI)

 Educational adequacy of schools
 Current and proposed instructional programs
 Current and projected population growth and
decline
 Lease obligations, current and possible use of
buildings, and administrative facilities

The following criteria were used for decision making.

 Educational enhancement – meet the

educational needs of all students
 Efficient space utilization – optimum utilization
range was between 85%-105% of permanent
capacity
 Cost savings – decrease M&O expenses or capital
cost avoidance of correcting building
deficiencies and building operating costs per
student
 Future growth – account for future population
growth/decreases
 Facility condition – facility condition index rating

Page 193
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendix A
FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts
White Paper:
Facility Condition Index (FCI) at Austin ISD
The assessment of school facilities and the development of long-range master plans, is Magellan
Consulting’s core business. District-wide master plans, by their very nature, recommend changes across
a district. In nearly every district in which we work, there are building condition and student capacity
challenges. Often, there exists enough capacity across the district when compared to total student
enrollment; however, that capacity is rarely in the right place. In the last five years, every large urban
district we have worked with has faced considerable loss of enrollment district-wide which eventually
necessitates reducing overall footprint and closing schools. We typically see changes in educational
programs that make the alignment of facilities a challenge, as curriculum and delivery methods are ever-
evolving. Nearly 90 percent of our country’s 21st century schools were designed and constructed in the
20th century, most in the mid 20th century, under an industrial age factory model with a long row of
classrooms down a double-loaded corridor. The condition of schools, with the exception of very
wealthy districts, is declining across the country. The recent economic climate is exacerbates this
problem as maintenance funds are decreasing. Texas the new education funding system in Texas is
placing greater emphasis on the use of Maintenance and Operations (M&O) funds. Unfortunately,
deferred maintenance does not go away with reduced funding, and the unmet need continues to build
until the cost to repair eventually exceeds the cost to replace the facility.

Commonly, communities have a widespread perception that school districts shape, hide, or manipulate
building condition data to obtain a desired result. This perception may even result in a law suit, which
creates the necessity to engage in projects that are driven by legal requirements. While years ago there
may have been school districts that were guilty of these charges, particularly in the era of racial
segregation and the court-ordered desegregation that followed, the fact is that we have not seen data
manipulation at any of the districts in which we have worked for over a decade.

School district administrators and facility staffs continually request that we simplify the data and planning
parameters. The process of engaging the community offers a broad spectrum of individuals who want to
participate. These diverse groups of individuals may speak different languages, have different educational
backgrounds, different levels of school planning experience. Some may have a deep understanding of
mathematics and can easily read charts and graphs, while others will not. The main challenge herein, is
that the amount and type of data used in the planning process is very complex. Depending upon the
issue, capacity can include a variety of factors. Capacity may include only permanent space, or it may
include both permanent and temporary space. Capacity can be adjusted for smaller class sizes, and
utilization can affect capacity when smaller class sizes are required for special needs students. In
addition, the Facility Condition Index FCI may include only current costs, or it may include a forecast of
future system replacements that are going to occur within the next three to five years. Enrollment data
is often complicated by official enrollment, staffing enrollment, average daily membership, and even the
time of year. Although there is often a desire to simplify the information presented, it is not
always possible to do so while maintaining access to the kinds of data that are presented in
the complex planning process. The variables in data mean to the outside individual that numbers
may be different from one context to another. Capacities change from year to year, buildings
deteriorate on a daily basis, and enrollment fluctuates. School planners are always working with a
moving target.

Page 1
Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative
condition of a group of schools. This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a facility by the
total cost to replace the facility. For example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might
theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now has $1 million
in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by $10 million results in an FCI Campuses
FCI of 10 percent. The National Association of College and University
Business Officers has suggested for college planning that an FCI of less <10% Repair
than 5 percent is good, an FCI between 5 and 10 percent is fair, and an 10-19% Renovate
FCI greater than 10 percent is poor. In K-12 public school planning,
the gulf between 10 percent and 100 percent is just not stratified 20-29%
enough. For several years, Magellan Consulting has used the chart 30-39%
displayed to the right, with clients to provide a little more gradation.
40-49%
We often find district-wide FCI averages in the 20 to 30 percent range.
50-59%
Schools in the 30 to 60 percent range are probably the most difficult
to plan for long-term. Financial modeling has shown that over a 30- 60-69% Replace
year period, schools that fall in the 65 percent or greater range are
70-79%
more cost-effective to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency
gains with more modern facilities and the value of the building at the 80-89%
end of the analysis period. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used
90-100%
to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement or even
closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community >100%
sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are
analyzed when making school facility decision.

The FCI calculation, while seemingly simple, yields a consistent result that can commonly be compared
across districts, as the same factors are almost always considered in deriving the numerator and the
denominator. It should also be noted that there are nuances regarding the process for calculating FCI
that must be understood.

FCI: The Denominator

The denominator is the bottom part of the equation and possibly the easiest with which to start. The
denominator is the theoretical cost to replace the facility. It is important to recognize that this cost is
based on the replacement of a building with another facility that is the same size and is fully
code compliant. If, for example, you are comparing the FCI on a 3,450 square foot gymnasium building
at a campus, the replacement cost is the theoretical cost to replace that same 3,450 square foot
building. For the purpose of FCI, it is not important whether the district actually replaces that building.
Depending on campus type and other factors that might include joint use, the district might decided to
replace the 3,450 building with a 12,000 square foot gymnasium building that would be built to the
district’s current educational specifications and cost considerably more. For the purposes of FCI, we
are trying to establish a benchmark to compare a group of facilities so the repair costs are compared to
the theoretical cost to replace that same facility.

Since the replacement cost comparison is primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school,
middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of cost models have been developed that estimate
the cost per square foot for new construction. The cost models take into account national industry
averages from a recognized industry data source called RSMeans®, adjusted to Austin, Texas, as well as

Page 2
the district’s recent experience in the Austin construction market. The costs per square foot are then
multiplied by the size of the school or building under consideration.

“Construction Cost” is a term that may mean different things to different people. To contractors,
construction cost generally means the amount they are paid to construct the building, and that figure
generally does not include a contingency for unforeseen conditions. To the school district facilities staff,
construction cost typically refers to the planning budget to construct the building plus a small
contingency for unforeseen conditions and may also include the cost to bring utilities to a site. To the
school board, construction cost often means the total costs spent on the project which includes the
architects’ fees and the cost to manage the overall construction program. Therefore, it is important to
be careful which costs to include in the replacement cost denominator calculation. For FCI purposes,
we include all of the costs associated with completing the project for the amount of funding that is
required in total. That includes the base construction cost (often referred to as “hard costs”); plus
inflation; plus professional fees; plus administrative costs for testing, surveys, and advertising; plus
management costs; plus contingencies; plus escalation to an estimated mid-point of construction (often
referred to as “soft costs”). These total costs are significantly more than the base construction cost
paid to the contractor. The following table shows the average costs used in determining the
replacement cost for AISD, based on the building type and the buildings’ gross square footage measured
to the outside of exterior walls.
ES MS HS Admin Portable
Square Feet 82,500 170,000 330,000 20,000 1,536
Cost / SqFt $ 185.54 $ 204.20 $ 201.53 $ 176.65 $ 85.97
Construction Cost $ 15,306,924.11 $ 34,714,158.47 $ 66,504,421.68 $ 3,532,981.28 $ 132,047.22
A/E Services $ 1,224,553.93 $ 2,777,132.68 $ 5,320,353.73 $ 317,968.32 $ 11,884.25
Site/Survey $ 30,613.85 $ 69,428.32 $ 133,008.84 $ 7,065.96 $ 264.09
Permits/Fees $ 68,881.16 $ 156,213.71 $ 299,269.90 $ 15,898.42 $ 198.07
Testing $ 114,801.93 $ 260,356.19 $ 498,783.16 $ 26,497.36 $ 660.24
Furn/Fixt/Equip (FF&E) $ 918,415.45 $ 2,082,849.51 $ 3,990,265.30 $ 141,319.25 $ 7,262.60
Other $ 612,276.96 $ 1,388,566.34 $ 2,660,176.87 $ 137,654.34 $ 6,602.36
Project Budget $ 18,276,467 $ 41,448,705 $ 79,406,279 $ 4,179,385 $ 158,919
Program-level contg @ 10% 1,827,647 4,144,871 7,940,628 417,938 15,892
Program Management $ 1,005,206 $ 2,279,679 $ 4,367,345 $ 229,866 $ 8,741
Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% $ 3,431,999 $ 7,783,337 $ 14,911,101 $ 784,815 $ 29,842
Total Program Cost $ 24,541,319 $ 55,656,592 $ 106,625,354 $ 5,612,004 $ 213,393

Cost Per Square Feet $ 297.47 $ 327.39 $ 323.11 $ 280.60 $ 138.93

FCI: The Numerator

The numerator is the top part of the equation and is a little more complicated. The numerator is the
estimated cost to complete the repairs on the building in its current condition. This repair cost is
generally considered to be like-for-like repairs. Within reason, the deficient conditions would be
repaired or systems replaced to put the building into fully serviceable condition to meet current codes.
This is where it gets complicated. In determining which costs to include in the repair cost, one has to
consider if the same conditions would be included in the replacement facility. Classroom additions, for
instance, would add square footage to the building. It would not be comparable to include the addition’s
new construction cost portion of the repaired facility to a facility of the same size, unless the square
footage was added to the replacement facility cost estimate. One would not include building needs that
have not yet occurred, also called “projected needs,” as that would be comparing a building’s future

Page 3
state to that of what would be replaced today. Generally, studies or hazardous material costs that might
be encountered even under a demolition scenario would not be included.

At AISD, the district retained a firm in 2006 to assess all of the facilities in the district and develop cost
estimates to make needed repairs. That effort included a walkthrough of all facilities using architects and
engineers to identify deficient conditions in the buildings. This survey focused, for the most part, on the
condition of the existing buildings and did not include educational adequacy or functional equity type
needs (more on that later). All of the identified needs were grouped into building systems, and a
Uniformat® cost structure supported by RSMeans® nationally-based cost data adjusted to the Austin,
Texas area was employed to develop consistent cost estimates across all schools. These cost estimates,
using the industry standard line item costs, comprise the majority of the costs in the AISD facility
assessment database and are included in the numerator of the FCI calculation. The construction cost
value of all of these deficient conditions, prior to adding soft costs for professional fees, contingency, and
escalation total approximately $444.9 million.

However, the facility condition assessment did not focus on what the assessment industry calls
“educational adequacy” items. Where a building assessment focuses on the condition of the building and
what is broken, an educational adequacy assessment focuses on how well the school supports the
instructional mission and looks objectively at what is missing. As part of this master planning effort,
AISD conducted an educational adequacy assessment of all schools. This assessment made use of the
district’s educational specifications, supplemented with information collected during a three-day
workshop that involved numerous staff, principals, and teachers. A set of standards was developed for
each school type, the buildings typically found on the campus, and for each instructional space. These
standards identified in detail the size of the teaching spaces, the number of students in each space,
physical conditions, plumbing requirements, the number of computer outlets and electrical plugs, and
the type of instructional support for each space, in addition to safety and supervision considerations.
During the summer of 2010, a team of assessors went to each school and collected an inventory of each
space at the classroom level. This data was then compared to the previously developed standards to
identify when an individual space did not meet a specific standard. When an item did not meet the
standard, the condition was noted and a line item was added to the assessment database with a budget
to correct that condition. This has resulted in the identification of approximately $113.5 million in
educational adequacy-related deficiencies.

The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over
41,000 line items district-wide. Base costs must added up to provide a total that is comparable to the
replacement cost total program budgets use as the denominator of the calculation. Again, the design
and construction industry commonly refers to these costs as “soft costs.” The soft costs factoring is
done at a deficiency level, and every deficiency receives a specific cost allocation. The facilities staff of
AISD has conducted a review of recent projects to gain a better understanding of the associated costs
based on a variety of different types of repairs. The district has an established default soft costs factor
that is added to deficiencies of a standard nature. However, air conditioning and mechanical-related
deficiencies are typically done by mechanical contractors that may require additional engineering
requirements. For this reason, a separate model was established for all HVAC/mechanical repairs. For
life safety-related deficiencies, including security cameras and alarms, the costs are primarily equipment
related and do not have requirements for design and engineering so they too have their own model.
The deficiencies noted for ADA repairs were developed under a slightly different cost structure so a
different factor is applied to these items to provide consistent cost estimates at the project level.
Finally, the functional equity needs for additions and new construction on existing campuses have their

Page 4
own soft cost model. The following chart shows the percentage factors that are applied to every $100
of estimated repair cost to derive the total repair cost figure used in calculating the FCI.

Default HVAC Life Safety ADA Equity

Cost Basis $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00
Construction Cost $ 138.46 $ 138.46 $ 103.46 $ 196.37 $ 196.37
A/E Services $ 20.77 $ 20.77 $ 4.14 $ 29.46 $ 29.46
Permits/Fees $ 0.62 $ 0.62 $ 0.47 $ 0.88 $ 0.88
Testing $ 0.42 $ 0.42 $ - $ 0.59 $ 0.59
Other $ 23.26 $ 28.11 $ 1.34 $ 32.99 $ 32.99
Project Budget $ 184 $ 188 $ 109 $ 260 $ 260
Program-level contg @ 10% 18 19 11 26 26
Program Management $ 10 $ 10 $ 6 $ 14 $ 14
Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% $ 34 $ 35 $ 21 $ 49 $ 49
Total Program Cost $ 246 $ 253 $ 147 $ 350 $ 350
Soft Cost Factor (%) 78% 83% 42% 78% 78%

The total facility condition cost totals approximately $963.1 million after adding soft costs to the costs
for correcting deficient building and ADA conditions and the educational adequacy costs. During the
August work sessions, the need was approximated at $875 million, but at that time it was believed that
the need would eventually be lowered as data was reviewed. The $875 million figure really represented
the total construction cost (hard cost) required to correct current deficiencies. Indeed the comparable
cost has decreased to about $558.4 million; however, the overall total need is now about $1.08 billion,
including functional equity needs at 44 campuses (discussed in more detail below). Since the August
worksession:

1 Deficiencies have been reviewed and, in some cases, modified by AISD facilities staff (part of
ongoing AISD facility management procedures) – decreased cost.
2 Overlapping cost between ADA studies and building condition deficiencies have been addressed
– decreased cost.
3 Overlapping cost between functional equity deficiencies, ADA deficiencies, and building
condition deficiencies have been addressed – decreased cost.
4 Overlapping cost between educational adequacy deficiencies and building condition deficiencies
have been addressed – decreased cost.
5 Location factor that adjusts RSMeans® data to the Austin area has been corrected – decreased
cost.
6 Algorithm that applies the location factor to RSMeans® data has been corrected – decreased
cost.
7 Revised soft cost models have been developed and applied to accurately reflect the total cost
required to correct deficiencies in a potential capital improvement program – increased cost.

Page 5
 A B C D
Means Estimates Construction Cost Soft Cost Total (B+C)
ADA Compliance $ 38,749,957 $ 40,067,456 $ 30,435,239 $ 70,502,695
Building Condition $ 304,472,387 $ 404,854,077 $ 302,743,840 $ 707,597,917
Educational Suitability $ 93,543,573 $ 113,518,330 $ 71,508,880 $ 185,027,210

$ 436,765,917 $ 558,439,863 $ 404,687,959 $ 963,127,822

Compares to $875M

Functional Equity $ 58,358,503 $ 68,256,105 $ 51,471,929 $ 119,728,034

$ 495,124,420 $ 626,695,968 $ 456,159,888 $ 1,082,855,856

Functional equity needs are different from educational adequacy needs. Educational adequacy is an
analysis of the existing conditions to determine if they meet the district’s educational specifications and
to determine which corrections can logically be made to achieve the standards in an existing structure.
Functional equity is an analysis comparing the area allocations for areas within the school to determine if
they meet the current educational specifications based on the target number of students at the school.
This analysis has resulted in the recommendation for additions to expand libraries, gymnasiums,
cafeterias, administration spaces, and classrooms at several locations. These additions constitute new
space and are therefore not included in the calculation of the FCI. A summary of the functional equity
improvements, although not included in the FCI calculation, is included for reference below.

Page 6
Functional Equity Additions / Renovations

School Number and Name Library Gym Cafeteria Admin Classroom Total
009 Anderson HS - 7,558,381 - - 737,651 8,296,032
002 Austin HS 93,707 1,000,768 - 341,590 6,583,925 8,019,990
005 McCallum HS 1,056,715 974,456 - - - 2,031,171
007 Travis HS - 497,614 - - - 497,614

054 Bedichek MS 1,226,494 1,200,183 - 279,273 10,809,492 13,515,442

046 Burnet MS - - 1,121,709 - - 1,121,709
057 Covington MS - - - - 1,256,499 1,256,499
055 Dobie MS - 4,791,499 778,272 - 290,814 5,860,584
051 Martin MS 830,896 1,996,919 - - - 2,827,815
058 Mendez MS - - - - 1,323,155 1,323,155
052 Murchison MS 382,212 - 791,197 252,361 6,564,076 7,989,847
047 O. Henry MS - - 702,568 - 2,492,687 3,195,256
048 Pearce MS - - - - 751,499 751,499
053 Webb MS - - - 703,953 - 703,953

142 Allan ES 756,946 - - - - 756,946

102 Andrews ES 1,197,967 110,786 - - - 1,308,753
149 Barrington ES - 2,377,285 119,095 - - 2,496,380
107 Brentwood ES - 720,110 718,725 - - 1,438,834
109 Brown ES 101,554 2,561,928 - - - 2,663,482
161 Cook ES - 2,949,680 115,402 - - 3,065,082
113 Cunningham ES - 2,543,464 115,402 812,893 - 3,471,759
114 Dawson ES - 913,985 - 284,351 - 1,198,336
154 Doss ES - - - 486,074 - 486,074
116 Govalle ES 847,514 2,460,375 - 177,258 - 3,485,146
117 Gullett ES 1,154,714 482,843 1,442,527 698,414 1,307,276 5,085,774
119 Highland Park ES - 886,289 796,275 - 517,002 2,199,566
155 Hill ES - 2,404,981 135,713 - - 2,540,694
162 Houston ES - 191,106 - - - 191,106
120 Joslin ES 960,146 - 580,704 - - 1,540,850
160 Linder ES 2,901,672 2,331,124 109,863 - 109,863 5,452,522
122 Maplewood ES - - 1,315,585 - 76,858 1,392,443
123 Mathews ES - - - 47,777 2,160,329 2,208,105
150 Norman ES 516,771 - 268,195 670,256 - 1,455,222
151 Pillow ES 1,140,404 - - 979,995 - 2,120,400
130 Pleasant Hill ES - - - 33,697 249,269 282,966
136 St. Elmo ES - 809,200 - - 517,002 1,326,202
127 Sanchez ES - 2,441,910 168,026 - - 2,609,936
139 Sims ES - 717,340 - - - 717,340
158 Sunset Valley ES - 1,955,836 - 101,554 - 2,057,390
140 Travis Heights ES - - - 978,611 - 978,611
166 Williams ES - 1,695,489 - - - 1,695,489
157 Winn ES 2,880,438 2,654,250 839,205 - 124,634 6,498,528
144 Wooten ES - 406,216 - 704,415 - 1,110,631
146 Zilker ES - 2,409,598 - - - 2,409,598
Figures have been adjusted to eliminate overlap between Condition Assessment and ADA Studies

Page 7
FCI Results
For AISD, the FCI calculations include the building condition assessment results, the educational
adequacy assessment results, and the type one and two ADA compliance considerations and then
compare them to the cost of replacing the same facility. These FCI figures provide a benchmark that can
be used to consistently compare AISD facilities district-wide. The planning team refers to the FCI to aid
in decision making when a school or building is subject to renovation, when a change in educational
program is contemplated, or when the school is targeted for replacement, consolidation, or closure for
efficiency reasons. It is not the principle driver, but rather a supporting consideration to guide the
district and hopefully prohibit the district from making additional investment into a building that is close
to or has reached the end of its serviceable life. The following chart is a summary of all of the district’s
facilities by FCI. The one school that falls in the 70-79 percent range is Pease Elementary, a historic
location celebrated as the longest operating public school in the state.

District Wide Facility Condition Index (FCI) by Campus

FCI Campuses

<10% Repair 17 40
10-19% Renovate 33
35
20-29% 28
30
30-39% 36
25
40-49% 9
Count

50-59% 2 20

60-69% Replace - 15

70-79% 1 10
80-89% - 5
90-100% -
-
>100% - <10% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90-100% >100%

Total 126

Page 8
 Tuesday, 25 January 201
AISD School/Facility FCI Summary Total minus NC
Priorities 1-5 and Some ADA Cost included in Priority 1-5 Future system renewals (reviewed each year and converted to deficiency or revised)
Grades School Total Total Priority Total Facility FCI Related Total Replacement Educational Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle
No. Campus Name Served Type Historic * Age Site Permanent Priority 1 Priority 2 1 and 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Condition Cost Facility Cost Cost FCI Functional Equity Adequacy 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Pre-K
131 Lucy Read Pre-K School PK Pre-K 1961 9.9 64,644 $ 191,332 $ 1,073,643 $ 1,264,975 $ 980,523 $ 154,414 $ 9,470 $ 2,409,383 $ 2,399,913 $ 21,971,173 10.9% $ - $ 715,064 $ - $ 2,090,886 $ 6,442,088 $ - $ - $ -

Elementary Schools
128 Pease Elementary School K-6 ES Historical 1876 2.8 35,624 $ 364,408 $ 2,777,323 $ 3,141,731 $ 3,762,707 $ 712,502 $ 51,831 $ 7,668,770 $ 7,616,940 $ 10,597,089 71.9% $ - $ 743,252 $ - $ 86,265 $ 77,670 $ 1,253,802 $ - $ 33,826
144 Wooten Elementary School PK-5 ES 1955 6.7 53,689 $ 1,033,751 $ 4,385,700 $ 5,419,450 $ 6,098,924 $ 541,732 $ 1,159,269 $ 13,219,375 $ 12,060,106 $ 21,453,872 56.2% $ 1,110,631 $ 1,403,037 $ - $ 1,883,347 $ 63,872 $ 1,951,276 $ - $ 1,191,773
146 Zilker Elementary School PK-6 ES 1950 11.8 50,941 $ 768,270 $ 2,903,030 $ 3,671,300 $ 5,560,055 $ 853,301 $ 2,565,129 $ 12,649,785 $ 10,084,656 $ 18,351,848 55.0% $ 2,409,599 $ 1,023,970 $ - $ 1,270,160 $ 92,992 $ 4,073,372 $ - $ -
136 St. Elmo Elementary School PK-5 ES 1960 9.4 48,212 $ 516,693 $ 1,517,877 $ 2,034,569 $ 4,531,790 $ 238,602 $ 1,342,548 $ 8,147,509 $ 6,804,962 $ 15,255,478 44.6% $ 1,326,203 $ 1,045,047 $ - $ - $ 137,545 $ 3,902,096 $ 990,535 $ -
120 Joslin Elementary School PK-5 ES 1954 5.1 44,826 $ 357,433 $ 1,962,599 $ 2,320,031 $ 4,054,494 $ 515,428 $ 1,576,163 $ 8,466,116 $ 6,889,953 $ 15,618,987 44.1% $ 1,540,851 $ 905,386 $ 40,015 $ 398,891 $ 2,860,759 $ - $ 39,682 $ 165,640
129 Pecan Springs Elementary School PK-5 ES 1957 7.6 56,992 $ 204,113 $ 676,135 $ 880,248 $ 5,758,530 $ 1,719,886 $ 90,134 $ 8,448,798 $ 8,358,664 $ 19,694,928 42.4% $ - $ 1,346,708 $ 689,378 $ - $ 176,873 $ 2,745,381 $ - $ 627,731
119 Highland Park Elementary School K-5 ES 1952 6.3 58,550 $ 508,160 $ 717,075 $ 1,225,235 $ 5,579,104 $ 1,538,618 $ 2,241,968 $ 10,584,925 $ 8,342,957 $ 20,158,386 41.4% $ 2,199,567 $ 1,112,435 $ 314,065 $ 103,539 $ 5,348,882 $ - $ - $ -
158 Sunset Valley Elementary School PK-5 ES 1971 10.4 66,467 $ 170,770 $ 2,951,967 $ 3,122,737 $ 5,140,210 $ 235,908 $ 2,104,101 $ 10,602,957 $ 8,498,856 $ 20,685,803 41.1% $ 2,057,391 $ 1,005,839 $ 3,359 $ 146,650 $ 5,795,758 $ - $ 63,689 $ -
151 Pillow Elementary School PK-5 ES 1969 10.0 54,247 $ 223,451 $ 549,981 $ 773,433 $ 6,867,650 $ 293,128 $ 2,141,509 $ 10,075,720 $ 7,934,211 $ 19,335,286 41.0% $ 2,120,401 $ 1,237,573 $ - $ - $ 90,861 $ 4,133,647 $ - $ 349,553
121 Lee Elementary School K6
K-6 ES 1939 48
4.8 46 265
46,265 $ 426 784
426,784 $ 1 848 564
1,848,564 $ 2 275 348
2,275,348 $ 3 225 098
3,225,098 $ 200 247
200,247 $ 36 675
36,675 $ 5 737 368
5,737,368 $ 5 700 693
5,700,693 $ 13 990 931
13,990,931 40 7%
40.7% $ - $ 1 268 395
1,268,395 $ 91 681
91,681 $ 308 338
308,338 $ 403 875
403,875 $ 1 264 372
1,264,372 $ - $ 331 335
331,335
126 Ortega Elementary School PK-5 ES 1959 7.4 47,302 $ 523,332 $ 2,675,557 $ 3,198,889 $ 2,629,766 $ 198,140 $ 55,295 $ 6,082,090 $ 6,026,795 $ 14,984,780 40.2% $ - $ 794,706 $ 15,997 $ 291,824 $ 6,634,577 $ - $ - $ -
113 Cunningham Elementary School PK-5 ES 1963 8.8 71,600 $ 174,656 $ 596,703 $ 771,359 $ 7,904,357 $ 475,256 $ 3,523,663 $ 12,674,635 $ 9,122,729 $ 23,126,547 39.4% $ 3,471,761 $ 1,336,362 $ - $ 2,720,304 $ 106,948 $ 6,961,969 $ - $ 66,716
139 Sims Elementary School PK-5 ES 1956 8.4 44,337 $ 853,727 $ 764,716 $ 1,618,443 $ 3,853,963 $ 273,990 $ 748,483 $ 6,494,878 $ 5,746,396 $ 15,016,609 38.3% $ 717,340 $ 928,787 $ 33,570 $ 294,150 $ 3,658,941 $ 294,150 $ 518,859 $ 294,150
104 Becker Elementary School PK-5 ES Historical 1936 3.7 59,670 $ 1,114,902 $ 2,132,597 $ 3,247,499 $ 3,338,909 $ 247,800 $ 202,026 $ 7,036,234 $ 6,917,872 $ 18,663,896 37.1% $ - $ 977,746 $ 248,039 $ 92,188 $ 5,315,724 $ - $ 290,561 $ -
166 Williams Elementary School PK-5 ES 1976 14.0 64,846 $ 207,027 $ 4,161,651 $ 4,368,677 $ 3,128,729 $ 634,239 $ 1,784,696 $ 9,916,341 $ 8,121,348 $ 22,031,262 36.9% $ 1,695,490 $ 1,806,830 $ 450,882 $ 940,290 $ 444,986 $ 3,622,459 $ - $ 1,214,247
122 Maplewood Elementary School PK-6 ES 1951 6.4 45,390 $ 1,421,706 $ 631,008 $ 2,052,714 $ 3,734,924 $ 149,102 $ 1,440,006 $ 7,376,745 $ 5,936,739 $ 16,243,675 36.5% $ 1,392,443 $ 648,571 $ - $ 1,719,406 $ 835,697 $ 3,479,313 $ 835,697 $ 835,697
140 Travis Heights Elementary School PK-5 ES 1938 3.2 59,589 $ 942,440 $ 3,085,534 $ 4,027,975 $ 2,409,904 $ 505,213 $ 1,052,121 $ 7,995,213 $ 6,943,092 $ 19,096,715 36.4% $ 978,611 $ 991,804 $ 19,612 $ 436,973 $ 3,640,462 $ - $ 826,657 $ 496,703
147 Menchaca Elementary School PK-5 ES 1975 19.8 59,978 $ 237,446 $ 4,419,488 $ 4,656,934 $ 2,287,461 $ 693,652 $ 82,611 $ 7,720,657 $ 7,638,046 $ 21,040,089 36.3% $ - $ 1,093,862 $ 518,626 $ 143,304 $ 6,136,714 $ - $ - $ 583,851
116 Govalle Elementary School PK-5 ES 1940 8.4 77,638 $ 340,133 $ 2,420,667 $ 2,760,800 $ 4,297,646 $ 1,269,894 $ 3,581,856 $ 11,910,197 $ 8,328,341 $ 23,095,017 36.1% $ 3,485,148 $ 935,305 $ - $ 122,350 $ 5,137,491 $ - $ 1,447,255 $ 867,147
162 Houston Elementary School PK-5 ES 1976 13.8 81,360 $ 347,984 $ 5,418,810 $ 5,766,794 $ 4,286,298 $ 313,940 $ 251,318 $ 10,618,350 $ 10,367,032 $ 28,771,349 36.0% $ 191,106 $ 1,698,239 $ - $ 488,820 $ 4,324,456 $ - $ 1,304,328 $ -
105 Blackshear Elementary School PK-5 ES Historical 1937 5.3 70,726 $ 188,148 $ 2,520,906 $ 2,709,054 $ 3,786,009 $ 796,536 $ 58,019 $ 7,349,617 $ 7,291,599 $ 21,038,900 34.7% $ - $ 705,474 $ - $ 555,087 $ 89,894 $ 5,532,658 $ - $ -
110 Bryker Woods Elementary School K-6 ES 1939 6.3 37,517 $ 189,411 $ 1,439,598 $ 1,629,010 $ 2,614,525 $ 348,606 $ 44,654 $ 4,636,795 $ 4,592,141 $ 13,444,775 34.2% $ - $ 863,756 $ 11,448 $ 568,960 $ 3,319,342 $ 27,506 $ 593,451 $ 418,713
109 Brown Elementary School PK-6 ES 1957 10.1 53,853 $ 2,478,734 $ 1,307,103 $ 3,785,837 $ 1,854,637 $ 666,982 $ 2,665,997 $ 8,973,453 $ 6,307,456 $ 18,761,168 33.6% $ 2,663,484 $ 801,611 $ 152,017 $ 100,081 $ 6,899,273 $ - $ - $ -
168 Langford Elementary School PK-5 ES 1980 10.7 78,250 $ 522,264 $ 6,062,668 $ 6,584,931 $ 2,607,540 $ 292,001 $ 292,964 $ 9,777,436 $ 9,484,473 $ 28,303,131 33.5% $ - $ 1,519,228 $ 2,006,009 $ 37,112 $ 3,199,932 $ - $ - $ -
103 Barton Hills Elementary School K-6 ES 1964 9.9 38,291 $ 1,022,269 $ 1,319,518 $ 2,341,787 $ 2,090,831 $ 447,186 $ 14,346 $ 4,894,150 $ 4,879,804 $ 14,588,847 33.4% $ - $ 439,914 $ 37,728 $ - $ - $ 2,130,211 $ 466,339 $ 614,444
148 Oak Hill Elementary School PK-5 ES 1974 13.7 75,784 $ 577,910 $ 2,824,475 $ 3,402,384 $ 4,765,267 $ 417,412 $ 46,822 $ 8,631,886 $ 8,585,063 $ 25,741,908 33.4% $ - $ 1,650,197 $ - $ - $ 1,709,600 $ 4,588,158 $ 2,982,219 $ -
154 Doss Elementary School PK-5 ES 1970 9.7 60,228 $ 289,020 $ 2,176,942 $ 2,465,962 $ 4,326,744 $ 262,383 $ 522,873 $ 7,577,962 $ 7,055,089 $ 21,571,372 32.7% $ 486,074 $ 867,630 $ 632,852 $ - $ 4,578,304 $ - $ - $ -
108 Brooke Elementary School PK-5 ES 1954 5.9 52,282 $ 445,215 $ 1,390,469 $ 1,835,684 $ 3,167,000 $ 436,817 $ 37,886 $ 5,477,387 $ 5,439,501 $ 16,699,995 32.6% $ - $ 888,465 $ 1,364,384 $ 74,085 $ 2,801,622 $ - $ - $ -
150 Norman Elementary School PK-5 ES 1970 10.2 58,519 $ 474,423 $ 1,744,670 $ 2,219,093 $ 3,308,851 $ 249,133 $ 1,520,636 $ 7,297,712 $ 5,747,841 $ 17,864,592 32.2% $ 1,455,222 $ 880,325 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,797,099 $ - $ 900,415
142 Allan Elementary School PK-5 ES 1957 19.5 112,608 $ 1,132,129 $ 2,295,433 $ 3,427,562 $ 6,758,822 $ 558,919 $ 800,915 $ 11,546,218 $ 10,745,303 $ 33,497,560 32.1% $ 756,946 $ 1,511,428 $ - $ - $ 977,818 $ 6,233,347 $ - $ 3,570,928
123 Mathews Elementary School PK-6 ES Historical 1916 2.3 42,112 $ 103,898 $ 1,531,441 $ 1,635,339 $ 2,354,476 $ 285,980 $ 2,232,330 $ 6,508,124 $ 4,275,795 $ 13,440,313 31.8% $ 2,208,106 $ 841,669 $ 1,847 $ - $ 2,255,558 $ - $ 1,522 $ 119,956
133 Ridgetop Elementary School PK-5 ES 1939 5.0 35,585 $ 165,485 $ 1,305,314 $ 1,470,799 $ 1,363,411 $ 899,377 $ 22,541 $ 3,756,128 $ 3,733,587 $ 11,956,232 31.2% $ - $ 492,082 $ 221,688 $ - $ 5,005,802 $ - $ - $ -
145 Zavala Elementary School PK-6 ES 1937 3.4 69,333 $ 808,799 $ 410,359 $ 1,219,158 $ 4,745,816 $ 414,056 $ 76,545 $ 6,455,575 $ 6,435,876 $ 20,624,524 31.2% $ - $ 1,032,634 $ - $ 531,642 $ 58,130 $ 5,407,954 $ - $ 707,726
117 Gullett Elementary School K-5 ES 1956 17 9
17.9 39 827
39,827 $ 296 571
296,571 $ 585 713
585,713 $ 882 284
882,284 $ 3 484 484
3,484,484 $ 278 491
278,491 $ 3 818 868
3,818,868 $ 8 464 128
8,464,128 $ 4 645 259
4,645,259 $ 15 275 706
15,275,706 30 4%
30.4% $ 3 778 500
3,778,500 $ 1 100 391
1,100,391 $ 1 081
1,081 $ - $ 11 690
11,690 $ 1 732 507
1,732,507 $ - $ 327 370
327,370
159 Graham Elementary School PK-5 ES 1972 9.9 70,589 $ 776,380 $ 4,075,512 $ 4,851,892 $ 1,880,720 $ 462,863 $ 145,540 $ 7,341,015 $ 7,195,475 $ 24,196,550 29.7% $ - $ 874,097 $ 124,863 $ 2,802,585 $ 849,306 $ 742,041 $ - $ -
124 Metz Elementary School PK-5 ES 1993 6.4 61,905 $ 245,693 $ 2,475,960 $ 2,721,653 $ 2,739,507 $ 239,898 $ 213,073 $ 5,914,131 $ 5,701,058 $ 19,328,741 29.5% $ - $ 958,961 $ 68,927 $ - $ 1,403,848 $ - $ - $ -
102 Andrews Elementary School PK-5 ES 1962 7.7 58,376 $ 573,941 $ 2,264,160 $ 2,838,101 $ 3,198,161 $ 190,659 $ 1,372,504 $ 7,599,425 $ 6,064,356 $ 20,563,542 29.5% $ 1,308,754 $ 1,030,292 $ 88,953 $ 394,762 $ 6,962,219 $ - $ - $ -
155 Hill Elementary School PK-5 ES 1970 8.9 69,626 $ 371,383 $ 1,640,124 $ 2,011,507 $ 4,471,269 $ 324,693 $ 2,573,608 $ 9,381,077 $ 6,807,469 $ 23,453,170 29.0% $ 2,540,696 $ 921,105 $ - $ 256,321 $ 1,566,379 $ 5,912,141 $ - $ -
132 Reilly Elementary School PK-5 ES 1954 10.8 41,646 $ 375,848 $ 938,169 $ 1,314,017 $ 2,449,679 $ 203,051 $ 11,517 $ 3,978,263 $ 3,966,747 $ 14,216,116 27.9% $ - $ 623,670 $ 1,984,128 $ 77,697 $ 2,011,030 $ - $ 93,968 $ -
161 Cook Elementary School K-5 ES 1974 12.7 67,344 $ 827,731 $ 3,216,256 $ 4,043,986 $ 2,658,575 $ 275,616 $ 3,122,125 $ 10,100,303 $ 6,978,178 $ 25,515,832 27.3% $ 3,065,083 $ 1,093,546 $ 149,147 $ 175,750 $ 3,616,650 $ 627,220 $ 1,706,117 $ 73,864
114 Dawson Elementary School PK-5 ES 1954 8.7 55,301 $ 820,865 $ 2,178,475 $ 2,999,340 $ 1,747,025 $ 124,053 $ 1,240,330 $ 6,110,749 $ 4,870,418 $ 18,054,973 27.0% $ 1,198,337 $ 812,429 $ - $ 1,400,324 $ 6,444,952 $ - $ - $ -
127 Sanchez Elementary School PK-5 ES 1976 9.2 78,131 $ 169,463 $ 3,739,168 $ 3,908,630 $ 2,474,272 $ 340,616 $ 2,701,170 $ 9,424,688 $ 6,723,519 $ 25,069,329 26.8% $ 2,609,937 $ 1,158,542 $ 59,241 $ - $ 8,682,783 $ - $ 1,406,822 $ -
125 Oak Springs Elementary School PK-5 ES 1958 8.6 47,102 $ 436,196 $ 1,687,039 $ 2,123,235 $ 1,853,482 $ 218,887 $ 30,328 $ 4,225,932 $ 4,195,604 $ 15,839,115 26.5% $ - $ 712,476 $ 50,075 $ - $ 1,264,660 $ 4,258,589 $ 224,809 $ 408,824
138 Summitt Elementary School PK-5 ES 1986 14.5 75,902 $ 454,240 $ 3,415,902 $ 3,870,142 $ 2,628,225 $ 256,850 $ 234,180 $ 6,989,397 $ 6,811,521 $ 25,777,010 26.4% $ - $ 1,075,677 $ - $ - $ 129,685 $ 2,574,244 $ - $ 686,055
152 Wooldridge Elementary School K-5 ES 1969 11.6 68,543 $ 656,264 $ 2,536,750 $ 3,193,014 $ 3,292,242 $ 360,461 $ 3,072 $ 6,848,790 $ 6,845,718 $ 26,329,413 26.0% $ - $ 961,821 $ 678,807 $ - $ 6,795,166 $ 27,837 $ - $ -
172 Kocurek Elementary School PK-5 ES 1986 12.3 78,528 $ 276,757 $ 1,059,358 $ 1,336,115 $ 4,367,370 $ 337,123 $ 84,409 $ 6,125,017 $ 6,040,608 $ 23,816,680 25.4% $ - $ 1,239,761 $ 91,267 $ - $ 3,798,724 $ 49,204 $ - $ 29,218
179 Davis Elementary School PK-5 ES 1993 13.2 72,149 $ 375,946 $ 775,366 $ 1,151,312 $ 4,164,062 $ 315,031 $ 172,691 $ 5,803,095 $ 5,630,404 $ 22,832,945 24.7% $ - $ 1,062,050 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,419,567 $ - $ -
118 Harris Elementary School PK-5 ES 1955 7.3 56,066 $ 152,298 $ 561,165 $ 713,463 $ 3,660,999 $ 351,166 $ 26,321 $ 4,751,949 $ 4,725,627 $ 19,876,385 23.8% $ - $ 1,301,321 $ 1,015,949 $ 698,136 $ 3,607,043 $ 66,135 $ 396,793 $ -
107 Brentwood Elementary School PK-5 ES 1951 16.7 62,891 $ 286,613 $ 1,092,859 $ 1,379,472 $ 2,982,254 $ 190,212 $ 1,442,616 $ 5,994,554 $ 4,551,938 $ 19,622,049 23.2% $ 1,438,835 $ 973,002 $ - $ 795,083 $ - $ 701,828 $ - $ 1,527,839
157 Winn Elementary School PK-5 ES 1970 10.0 62,087 $ 449,115 $ 1,040,367 $ 1,489,481 $ 2,585,347 $ 359,758 $ 6,577,791 $ 11,012,376 $ 4,434,586 $ 19,382,881 22.9% $ 6,498,531 $ 1,369,856 $ 523,437 $ - $ 7,060,275 $ - $ 231,324 $ -
178 Jordan Elementary School PK-5 ES 1992 11.5 74,460 $ 344,244 $ 963,877 $ 1,308,122 $ 4,056,546 $ 305,917 $ 366,415 $ 6,037,001 $ 5,670,585 $ 25,804,974 22.0% $ - $ 1,294,151 $ - $ - $ - $ 477,383 $ 652,541 $ -
149 Barrington Elementary School PK-6 ES 1969 12.1 78,971 $ 329,948 $ 682,054 $ 1,012,002 $ 4,998,919 $ 311,342 $ 2,516,731 $ 8,838,995 $ 6,322,264 $ 29,888,351 21.2% $ 2,496,381 $ 1,146,187 $ 659,256 $ 117,344 $ 5,539,758 $ - $ 74,998 $ -
111 Campbell Elementary School PK-5 ES 1992 9.7 61,793 $ 311,592 $ 756,406 $ 1,067,999 $ 2,651,752 $ 197,160 $ 377,355 $ 4,294,266 $ 3,916,911 $ 18,838,511 20.8% $ - $ 766,024 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,895,752 $ - $ 2,025,350
106 Blanton Elementary School PK-5 ES 1964 8.0 71,817 $ 642,778 $ 1,166,391 $ 1,809,169 $ 2,969,253 $ 230,709 $ 59,146 $ 5,068,277 $ 5,009,131 $ 24,104,928 20.8% $ - $ 1,313,917 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,624,957 $ 1,061,108 $ 930,511
101 Allison Elementary School PK-6 ES 1955 10.7 61,426 $ 173,617 $ 1,527,987 $ 1,701,604 $ 2,267,769 $ 210,014 $ 10,288 $ 4,189,675 $ 4,179,387 $ 20,556,998 20.3% $ - $ 907,125 $ 888,898 $ - $ 8,461,598 $ - $ - $ -
160 Linder Elementary School PK-5 ES 1972 9.1 69,250 $ 170,717 $ 1,591,137 $ 1,761,854 $ 2,915,462 $ 373,892 $ 5,522,354 $ 10,573,560 $ 5,051,207 $ 25,625,896 19.7% $ 5,452,525 $ 876,187 $ 3,359 $ - $ 8,379,961 $ - $ 1,350,196 $ -
130 Pleasant Hill Elementary School PK-5 ES 1985 10.1 65,729 $ 338,974 $ 584,593 $ 923,566 $ 3,245,311 $ 101,031 $ 389,803 $ 4,659,712 $ 4,269,909 $ 21,837,014 19.6% $ 282,966 $ 767,791 $ - $ - $ 2,570,985 $ - $ - $ 5,994,478
156 Odom Elementary School PK-55
PK ES 1970 8.6 61,009 $ 314,793 $ 786,254 $ 1,101,047 $ 2,816,072 $ 304,331 $ 75,095 $ 4,296,545 $ 4,221,450 $ 22,017,089 19.2% $ - $ 783,022 $ - $ 1,334,139 $ 8,441,635 $ - $ 512,483 $ -
143 Patton Elementary School PK-5 ES 1986 24.1 76,687 $ 553,125 $ 2,078,840 $ 2,631,965 $ 1,914,231 $ 172,467 $ 309,114 $ 5,027,777 $ 4,718,662 $ 26,010,525 18.1% $ - $ 969,016 $ - $ 1,372,576 $ 3,133,495 $ - $ - $ -
170 Boone Elementary School PK-5 ES 1986 12.5 73,690 $ 481,035 $ 381,979 $ 863,014 $ 2,606,876 $ 347,921 $ 318,391 $ 4,136,202 $ 3,817,811 $ 21,920,602 17.4% $ - $ 991,368 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,443,712 $ - $ 895,710
112 Casis Elementary School PK-5 ES 1951 14.2 77,911 $ 280,022 $ 631,690 $ 911,712 $ 2,858,536 $ 731,873 $ 298,311 $ 4,800,432 $ 4,739,853 $ 27,288,458 17.4% $ - $ 1,460,287 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,846,609 $ - $ 1,341,617
180 Kiker Elementary School K-5 ES 1992 12.4 76,332 $ 465,453 $ 863,540 $ 1,328,993 $ 2,886,032 $ 231,480 $ 270,058 $ 4,716,563 $ 4,446,505 $ 27,275,667 16.3% $ - $ 945,244 $ - $ 49,378 $ - $ 1,803,758 $ 653,545 $ 431,025
173 Casey Elementary School PK-5 ES 1998 17.9 81,506 $ 332,832 $ 410,575 $ 743,407 $ 1,088,761 $ 2,067,124 $ 78,748 $ 3,978,039 $ 3,899,292 $ 24,702,547 15.8% $ - $ 930,563 $ 518,353 $ 51,673 $ - $ 597,958 $ - $ 1,498,305
141 Walnut Creek Elementary School K-6 ES 1961 11.5 79,536 $ 369,397 $ 1,184,947 $ 1,554,343 $ 2,606,231 $ 199,636 $ 10,090 $ 4,370,301 $ 4,360,210 $ 28,685,677 15.2% $ - $ 1,064,371 $ - $ 182,264 $ 873,879 $ 7,597,851 $ 519,490 $ 597,440
175 Widen Elementary School PK-5 ES 1986 10.7 74,523 $ 344,749 $ 854,612 $ 1,199,361 $ 2,028,416 $ 207,421 $ 244,825 $ 3,680,022 $ 3,435,197 $ 26,737,543 12.8% $ - $ 1,026,980 $ - $ - $ 4,337,553 $ 554,102 $ 46,033 $ -
181 Mills Elementary School PK-5 ES 1998 10.7 81,368 $ 254,583 $ 738,249 $ 992,832 $ 1,919,394 $ 604,743 $ 163,005 $ 3,679,974 $ 3,516,969 $ 27,859,900 12.6% $ - $ 1,316,271 $ 103,612 $ 51,585 $ 1,005,499 $ 381,318 $ - $ -
176 Galindo Elementary School PK-5 ES 1989 10.8 85,482 $ 718,525 $ 617,531 $ 1,336,056 $ 1,310,639 $ 237,955 $ 427,229 $ 3,311,879 $ 3,148,934 $ 27,712,949 11.4% $ - $ 1,255,082 $ - $ 802,301 $ 3,869,834 $ - $ 33,159 $ -
171 Palm Elementary School PK-5 ES 1987 13.2 79,082 $ 326,618 $ 735,004 $ 1,061,621 $ 1,292,363 $ 302,890 $ 200,736 $ 2,857,612 $ 2,700,989 $ 24,438,393 11.1% $ - $ 1,129,509 $ - $ 982,017 $ 3,159,142 $ - $ - $ 202,415
182 Baranoff Elementary School K-5 ES 1999 15.6 80,088 $ 197,873 $ 620,619 $ 818,493 $ 1,724,996 $ 277,997 $ 121,554 $ 2,943,039 $ 2,821,485 $ 25,651,479 11.0% $ - $ 1,069,123 $ - $ 61,673 $ - $ 68,331 $ 2,131,585 $ 289,094
163 Hart Elementary School PK-5 ES 1998 15.7 81,042 $ 439,353 $ 651,866 $ 1,091,219 $ 1,474,912 $ 330,538 $ 150,402 $ 3,047,071 $ 2,896,669 $ 28,219,837 10.3% $ - $ 1,071,119 $ - $ - $ 1,389,062 $ - $ - $ -
183 Cowan Elementary School PK-5 ES 1999 22.5 70,234 $ 441,004 $ 332,647 $ 773,651 $ 1,110,874 $ 269,668 $ 287,289 $ 2,441,481 $ 2,154,192 $ 23,634,032 9.1% $ - $ 1,007,303 $ 2,592 $ - $ 46,308 $ - $ 909,058 $ -
190 Perez Elementary School PK-5 ES 2006 28.0 82,223 $ 1,206,199 $ 216,162 $ 1,422,361 $ 1,028,106 $ 150,809 $ - $ 2,601,276 $ 2,601,276 $ 29,028,065 9.0% $ - $ 1,027,736 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
174 Rodriguez Elementary School PK-5 ES 1999 15.0 79,918 $ 229,804 $ 571,723 $ 801,527 $ 1,201,157 $ 305,732 $ 64,181 $ 2,372,597 $ 2,308,416 $ 28,810,020 8.0% $ - $ 1,238,887 $ 181,326 $ - $ 1,235,929 $ - $ - $ 129,961
165 McBee Elementary School K-5 ES 1999 10.9 69,717 $ 233,168 $ 419,140 $ 652,308 $ 935,073 $ 242,060 $ 57,384 $ 1,886,824 $ 1,829,440 $ 23,236,719 7.9% $ - $ 883,087 $ 103,424 $ - $ 905,719 $ 326,716 $ - $ -
184 Clayton Elementary School K-5 ES 2006 16.8 99,921 $ 136,427 $ 382,446 $ 518,872 $ 1,142,866 $ 215,392 $ - $ 1,877,130 $ 1,877,130 $ 31,551,211 5.9% $ - $ 1,404,862 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
164 Pickle Elementary School PK-5 ES 2001 17.5 120,862 $ 267,092 $ 472,925 $ 740,017 $ 1,109,300 $ 347,992 $ 116,853 $ 2,314,161 $ 2,197,309 $ 37,780,539 5.8% $ - $ 1,225,897 $ - $ 76,624 $ 2,213,511 $ - $ - $ -
185 Blazier Elementary School PK-5 ES 2008 15.4 82,897 $ 136,781 $ 177,879 $ 314,660 $ 897,410 $ 205,711 $ - $ 1,417,781 $ 1,417,781 $ 27,857,817 5.1% $ - $ 978,883 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
189 Overton Elementary School PK-5 ES 2007 70.4 91,163 $ 129,148 $ 244,058 $ 373,207 $ 815,429 $ 285,538 $ - $ 1,474,175 $ 1,474,175 $ 30,773,624 4.8% $ - $ 1,014,803 $ 11,178 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
187 Baldwin Elementary School PK-5 ES 2010 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

P R E L I M I N A R YFor Discussion Purposes Only - Not for Distribution Page 9 1

 Tuesday, 25 January 201
AISD School/Facility FCI Summary Total minus NC
Priorities 1-5 and Some ADA Cost included in Priority 1-5 Future system renewals (reviewed each year and converted to deficiency or revised)
Grades School Total Total Priority Total Facility FCI Related Total Replacement Educational Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle
No. Campus Name Served Type Historic * Age Site Permanent Priority 1 Priority 2 1 and 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Condition Cost Facility Cost Cost FCI Functional Equity Adequacy 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Middle Schools
043 Fulmore Middle School 6-8 MS 1911 9.8 159,699 $ 1,617,557 $ 8,440,831 $ 10,058,388 $ 10,297,217 $ 1,511,473 $ 353,775 $ 22,220,853 $ 21,867,078 $ 54,800,107 39.9% $ - $ 1,873,471 $ - $ 3,075,170 $ 1,093,451 $ 10,606,887 $ - $ -
046 Burnet Middle School 6-8 MS 1961 23.7 137,768 $ 680,343 $ 8,454,488 $ 9,134,830 $ 8,304,574 $ 1,461,392 $ 1,181,923 $ 20,082,718 $ 18,900,796 $ 51,140,088 37.0% $ 1,121,710 $ 2,786,054 $ - $ 3,216,939 $ 11,921,049 $ - $ - $ -
051 Martin Middle School 6-8 MS 1966 9.9 107,983 $ 529,628 $ 8,140,464 $ 8,670,092 $ 4,095,451 $ 631,836 $ 2,902,231 $ 16,299,611 $ 13,397,380 $ 38,873,997 34.5% $ 2,827,816 $ 1,488,156 $ - $ 724,561 $ 3,271,440 $ 263,451 $ 701,789 $ 712,116
028 Ann Richards School 6-9 MS 1958 15.3 130,240 $ 1,508,254 $ 2,591,046 $ 4,099,300 $ 9,635,493 $ 775,306 $ 126,188 $ 14,636,287 $ 14,510,099 $ 45,071,376 32.2% $ - $ 1,975,612 $ - $ 1,499,490 $ - $ 3,956,665 $ - $ 3,047,417
054 Bedichek Middle School 6-8 MS 1972 23.3 130,600 $ 6,051,876 $ 3,945,474 $ 9,997,350 $ 4,163,524 $ 1,517,014 $ 13,573,742 $ 29,251,629 $ 15,677,887 $ 51,604,343 30.4% $ 13,515,449 $ 2,467,186 $ 4,508 $ - $ 2,650,553 $ 7,455,003 $ - $ 356,468
053 Webb Middle School 6-8 MS 1961 15.6 120,987 $ 702,171 $ 5,186,931 $ 5,889,101 $ 3,416,602 $ 1,414,705 $ 733,661 $ 11,454,070 $ 10,720,409 $ 42,628,637 25.1% $ 703,954 $ 2,101,392 $ - $ 1,482,994 $ 18,362,397 $ - $ - $ 304,618
052 Murchison Middle School 6-8 MS 1967 26.2 123,348 $ 487,937 $ 1,742,658 $ 2,230,595 $ 5,919,695 $ 1,040,012 $ 8,153,256 $ 17,343,558 $ 9,190,302 $ 45,706,537 20.1% $ 7,989,851 $ 1,754,965 $ - $ 870,677 $ - $ 3,358,614 $ - $ 2,236,239
045 Lamar Middle School 6-8 MS 1955 14.3 121,371 $ 868,064 $ 3,093,816 $ 3,961,880 $ 2,951,381 $ 1,109,337 $ 19,344 $ 8,041,942 $ 7,905,366 $ 41,245,693 19.2% $ - $ 2,294,389 $ - $ 3,674,723 $ 1,437,410 $ 15,314,979 $ 499,298 $ 604,270
057 Covington Middle School 6-8 MS 1986 21.3 173,636 $ 961,398 $ 4,103,037 $ 5,064,435 $ 5,125,919 $ 679,240 $ 1,412,579 $ 12,282,173 $ 10,869,594 $ 58,357,322 18.6% $ 1,256,500 $ 2,218,938 $ 105,730 $ 1,298,003 $ 6,554,733 $ - $ - $ -
044 Kealing Middle School 6-8 MS 1986 13.2 192,181 $ 375,942 $ 4,790,494 $ 5,166,436 $ 5,096,196 $ 962,232 $ 464,321 $ 11,689,185 $ 11,224,864 $ 62,920,315 17.8% $ - $ 2,797,674 $ - $ - $ 1,276,577 $ 3,882,825 $ - $ -
059 Bailey Middle School 6-8 MS 1993 41.3 148,143 $ 718,590 $ 2,697,101 $ 3,415,692 $ 3,857,767 $ 1,260,797 $ 175,348 $ 8,709,604 $ 8,535,824 $ 52,022,435 16.4% $ - $ 2,483,427 $ - $ 458,549 $ 865,089 $ 4,530,504 $ - $ 115,134
055 Dobie Middle School 6-8 MS 1973 20.2 134,563 $ 824,720 $ 1,445,797 $ 2,270,517 $ 3,813,669 $ 1,163,776 $ 5,893,686 $ 13,141,649 $ 7,247,963 $ 46,067,662 15.7% $ 5,860,587 $ 2,605,739 $ - $ 944,965 $ - $ 7,657,994 $ - $ 52,096
048 Pearce Middle School 6-8 MS 1958 14.8 132,596 $ 800,877 $ 1,437,083 $ 2,237,960 $ 4,068,914 $ 358,142 $ 778,495 $ 7,443,511 $ 6,665,016 $ 43,914,998 15.2% $ 751,499 $ 1,421,448 $ - $ 587,677 $ 9,832,350 $ 520,548 $ 520,548 $ 624,798
058 Mendez Middle School 6-8 MS 1987 20.7 173,382 $ 1,080,210 $ 4,476,217 $ 5,556,427 $ 2,728,204 $ 903,869 $ 1,452,455 $ 10,640,955 $ 9,188,500 $ 61,291,493 15.0% $ 1,323,156 $ 2,294,128 $ - $ - $ 3,450,026 $ 349,673 $ 2,739,493 $ -
047 O. Henry Middle School 6-8 MS 1953 13.8 124,320 $ 287,063 $ 881,787 $ 1,168,849 $ 4,014,354 $ 368,706 $ 3,229,843 $ 8,781,752 $ 5,551,909 $ 42,714,090 13.0% $ 3,195,257 $ 1,604,680 $ - $ 3,418,941 $ 2,491,358 $ 21,943,395 $ 1,545,281 $ 1,545,281
061 Paredes Middle School 6-8 MS 2000 78.2 148,695 $ 639,397 $ 1,114,968 $ 1,754,365 $ 2,327,460 $ 1,488,533 $ 274,674 $ 5,845,031 $ 5,570,358 $ 50,694,496 11.0% $ - $ 3,031,743 $ - $ - $ 464,540 $ 2,835,877 $ - $ 1,357,565
060 Small Middle School 6-8 MS 1999 36.5 160,599 $ 354,444 $ 1,183,574 $ 1,538,017 $ 1,842,811 $ 354,205 $ 162,029 $ 3,897,063 $ 3,735,034 $ 54,088,993 6.9% $ - $ 1,928,150 $ - $ - $ 105,768 $ - $ 2,899,325 $ -
056 Garcia Middle School 6-8 MS 2008 41.3 160,764 $ 341,779 $ 375,320 $ 717,098 $ 1,477,213 $ 256,690 $ - $ 2,451,001 $ 2,451,001 $ 52,634,348 4.7% $ - $ 1,785,189 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
062 Gorzycki Middle School 6-8 MS 2009 14.2 175,543 $ 309,464 $ 330,542 $ 640,006 $ 1,551,469 $ 435,269 $ - $ 2,626,743 $ 2,626,743 $ 57,473,012 4.6% $ - $ 1,948,774 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

High Schools
009 Anderson High School 9-12 HS 1973 38.8 309,329 $ 872,327 $ 14,645,298 $ 15,517,625 $ 9,089,827 $ 1,756,005 $ 7,822,456 $ 34,185,912 $ 34,060,012 $ 100,442,692 33.9% $ 7,696,555 $ 5,596,292 $ - $ 82,189 $ 35,729,898 $ 5,104,123 $ 1,198,250 $ 987,132
013 Bowie High School 9-12 HS 1988 66.0 417,702 $ 1,142,743 $ 15,244,574 $ 16,387,318 $ 12,975,427 $ 14,928,171 $ 884,595 $ 45,175,511 $ 44,290,916 $ 141,414,289 31.3% $ - $ 16,682,721 $ 1,616 $ 93,586 $ 11,966,964 $ 7,555,227 $ 3,975,742 $ 9,402,174
008 Crockett High School 9-12 HS 1969 39.5 335,087 $ 1,822,148 $ 10,749,436 $ 12,571,584 $ 18,627,243 $ 2,843,643 $ 186,183 $ 34,228,652 $ 34,042,470 $ 111,743,044 30.5% $ - $ 3,899,330 $ - $ 251,091 $ - $ 10,875,954 $ - $ 10,241,334
002 Austin High School 9-12 HS Historical 1975 44.3 307,089 $ 1,740,655 $ 8,535,603 $ 10,276,258 $ 16,368,786 $ 4,155,102 $ 8,187,414 $ 38,987,561 $ 30,800,146 $ 101,704,101 30.3% $ 8,019,994 $ 4,786,572 $ - $ 938,338 $ 13,862,778 $ - $ - $ 6,362,025
007 Travis High School 9-12 HS 1953 34.8 285,098 $ 1,031,621 $ 1,931,268 $ 2,962,889 $ 23,814,714 $ 1,842,818 $ 682,408 $ 29,302,829 $ 28,620,421 $ 95,250,042 30.0% $ 497,614 $ 3,901,369 $ - $ 4,228,932 $ - $ 18,284,795 $ - $ 5,285,709
015 Garza Independence High School 11-12 HS 1939 3.1 44,754 $ 730,527 $ 1,971,881 $ 2,702,408 $ 1,850,912 $ 516,483 $ 198,632 $ 5,268,436 $ 5,069,804 $ 17,523,392 28.9% $ - $ 1,160,890 $ - $ 101,402 $ 4,156,714 $ - $ 184,018 $ 221,729
029 INTERNATIONAL 9 - 10 HS - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) 9-12 HS 1960 27.6 267,140 $ 3,188,792 $ 11,898,236 $ 15,087,028 $ 6,567,860 $ 650,888 $ 213,544 $ 22,519,320 $ 22,305,776 $ 87,276,402 25.6% $ - $ 2,370,779 $ - $ 3,364,966 $ 20,164,666 $ - $ 191,819 $ 842,037
006 Reagan High School 9-12 HS 1965 31.8 249,609 $ 1,208,310 $ 1,714,894 $ 2,923,203 $ 12,037,630 $ 3,120,501 $ 348,003 $ 18,429,338 $ 18,081,335 $ 81,643,031 22.1% $ - $ 5,067,540 $ - $ - $ - $ 20,693,397 $ - $ 7,497,335
004 Lanier High School 9-12 HS 1966 28.5 262,640 $ 1,322,157 $ 4,586,776 $ 5,908,934 $ 11,951,394 $ 1,638,411 $ 176,389 $ 19,675,128 $ 19,498,739 $ 91,315,888 21.4% $ - $ 3,798,556 $ - $ 3,345,650 $ 17,256,847 $ 1,225,614 $ 5,886,803 $ 6,291,059
018 LASA 9 - 12 HS - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
005 McCallum High School 9-12 HS 1953 31.1 242,667 $ 889,802 $ 3,805,820 $ 4,695,621 $ 10,516,228 $ 1,362,340 $ 2,262,115 $ 18,836,304 $ 16,574,189 $ 83,866,651 19.8% $ 2,031,172 $ 3,347,251 $ 91,096 $ - $ - $ 15,204,331 $ - $ 625,946
014 Johnson (LBJ) High School 9-12 HS 1974 41.4 291,406 $ 1,082,734 $ 5,302,317 $ 6,385,051 $ 6,926,707 $ 1,922,200 $ 96,326 $ 15,330,284 $ 15,233,958 $ 98,125,689 15.5% $ - $ 3,610,445 $ - $ - $ - $ 12,732,059 $ 87,309 $ 5,590,330
017 Akins High School 9-12 HS 2000 57.7 324,950 $ 954,259 $ 1,716,584 $ 2,670,842 $ 3,402,121 $ 1,452,488 $ 134,171 $ 7,659,622 $ 7,525,451 $ 115,209,011 6.5% $ - $ 4,294,809 $ 68,460 $ - $ 3,596,030 $ 2,361,907 $ 174,607 $ 8,153,617

Other Facilities
852 Clifton Center Alt. Ed. Alt. Ed. 1977 7.8 39,039 $ 269,399 $ 1,823,193 $ 2,092,591 $ 2,585,577 $ 752,437 $ 36,615 $ 5,467,221 $ 5,430,606 $ 13,110,071 41.4% $ - $ 1,163,512 $ - $ 160,641 $ 434,632 $ 2,043,490 $ - $ 643,786
942 Pleasant Hill Annex Admin 1936 2.0 25,759 $ 270,019 $ 180,761 $ 450,779 $ 2,258,760 $ 94,588 $ - $ 2,804,127 $ 2,804,127 $ 7,228,209 38.8% $ - $ - $ 18,424 $ 651,480 $ 91,464 $ 2,758,717 $ - $ -
012 Ridgeview ALC 6-12 Alt. Ed. 1953 19.8 88,677 $ 607,465 $ 1,142,828 $ 1,750,293 $ 8,997,845 $ 1,481,999 $ 32,018 $ 12,262,155 $ 12,230,137 $ 31,629,925 38.7% $ - $ 843,199 $ 89,218 $ 152,239 $ 60,175 $ 4,665,406 $ - $ 200,134
251 Rosedale School Alt. Ed. Alt. Ed. 1939 4.9 37,112 $ 469,200 $ 597,181 $ 1,066,381 $ 3,325,976 $ 251,739 $ 68,255 $ 4,712,351 $ 4,644,096 $ 14,472,614 32.1% $ - $ 777,226 $ - $ 158,099 $ 584,887 $ 3,210,952 $ - $ -
960 Saegert Transportation ance - Transp 1975 10.6 26,916 $ 128,439 $ 185,122 $ 313,561 $ 1,386,917 $ 170,184 $ 28,659 $ 1,899,321 $ 1,870,662 $ 7,983,889 23.4% $ - $ - $ - $ 5,911,537 $ - $ 1,348,116 $ - $ 265,210
951 Burger Athletic Complex Support 1977 48.1 180,613 $ 1,189,429 $ 7,147,782 $ 8,337,211 $ 3,482,107 $ 35,546 $ 42,012 $ 11,896,876 $ 11,854,864 $ 50,681,646 23.4% $ - $ - $ 660,037 $ 9,602,090 $ 21,705,879 $ - $ 5,368,527 $ 1,568,720
941 Carruth Administration Center Admin 1991 2.8 133,989 $ 180,247 $ 903,444 $ 1,083,691 $ 5,447,886 $ 268,291 $ - $ 6,799,867 $ 6,799,867 $ 37,598,528 18.1% $ - $ - $ - $ 873,196 $ 4,063,829 $ - $ 503,680 $ -
252 Baker Center Admin 1911 4.8 65,868 $ 282,216 $ 1,675,465 $ 1,957,681 $ 1,216,053 $ - $ 202,910 $ 3,376,645 $ 3,173,734 $ 18,483,157 17.2% $ - $ - $ - $ 401,718 $ 8,936,109 $ 307,150 $ 3,022,760 $ 83,491
950 Noack Sports Complex Support 2004 11.2 3,232 $ 126,224 $ - $ 126,224 $ - $ - $ - $ 126,224 $ 126,224 $ 906,929 13.9% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 32,778 $ -
281 Nelson Field Support 1963 20.1 59,005 $ 422,773 $ 255,458 $ 678,231 $ 1,441,334 $ - $ 91,966 $ 2,211,531 $ 2,119,566 $ 16,557,338 12.8% $ - $ - $ - $ 904,496 $ - $ 13,451,989 $ - $ -
962 Service Center - Building & Grounds ance - Transp 1991 16.7 54,307 $ 170,528 $ 457,852 $ 628,380 $ 858,222 $ 44,245 $ 135,726 $ 1,666,573 $ 1,530,847 $ 15,239,037 10.0% $ - $ 15,999 $ - $ 135,414 $ 541,484 $ 1,199,760 $ - $ 39,210
948 House Park Support 1936 11.1 32,070 $ 137,227 $ 70,034 $ 207,260 $ 684,548 $ - $ 157,489 $ 1,049,297 $ 869,638 $ 8,999,133 9.7% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,609,602 $ - $ -
959 Nelson Field Bus Terminal ance - Transp 1995 6.6 13,093 $ 70,197 $ 152,181 $ 222,378 $ 59,959 $ - $ 24,167 $ 306,504 $ 282,337 $ 4,105,030 6.9% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 78,482 $ 72,579 $ - $ 303,193
922 Central Warehouse ance - Transp 1983 18.7 96,303 $ 268,665 $ 403,684 $ 672,349 $ 725,872 $ - $ 11,195 $ 1,409,416 $ 1,398,222 $ 27,023,496 5.2% $ - $ - $ - $ 506,898 $ 1,702,606 $ 8,491,274 $ - $ -
949 Delco Activity Center Support 2003 44.1 60,294 $ 259,623 $ 253,956 $ 513,580 $ 121,816 $ 10,355 $ - $ 645,750 $ 645,750 $ 16,919,044 3.8% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

TOTAL 12,242,071 $ 77,018,812 $ 289,710,249 $ 366,729,061 $ 493,094,959 $ 89,430,123 $ 133,493,695 $ 1,082,747,839 $ 957,325,465 $ 4,103,419,060 26.4% $ 119,728,034 $ 184,824,729 $ 15,200,156 $ 80,203,534 $ 407,100,902 $ 320,001,385 $ 51,896,848 $ 106,339,797
$ 965,542,467

P R E L I M I N A R YFor Discussion Purposes Only - Not for Distribution Page 10 2

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendix B
Facility Capacity Charts and
Population Updates
 AISD Permanent Capacity

Cafeteria = 4,200 SF / 880 Students Gym = 3,000 SF / 880 Students Library = 3,500 SF / 880 Students
Classroom Capacity 4.77 SF per Student 3.41 SF per Student 3.98 SF per Student
Average
% of Perm. % of Perm. Special Students Capacity Capacity Capacity
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2009-10 Capacity Classroom Rooms per Efficiency Classroom Café Area 4.77 SF per based on Café / Gym Area 3.41 SF per based on Gym / Library 3.98 SF per based on Library /
LOC Elementary Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop. Count (ES Only) Classroom Factor Capacity (SF) student Café Size Classroom (SF) student Gym Size Classroom Area (SF) student Library Size Classroom
142 Allan 673 379 56% 357 53% 42 6 22 85% 673 5,483 4.77 1,149 171% 6,160 3.41 1,806 268% 6,704 3.98 1,685 250%
101 Allison 486 543 112% 536 110% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,513 4.77 736 151% 2,972 3.41 871 179% 3,636 3.98 914 188%
102 Andrews 486 717 147% 604 124% 31 5 22 85% 486 3,361 4.77 705 145% 3,192 3.41 936 192% 2,217 3.98 557 115%
187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 488 73% 38 6 22 95% 669 4,507 4.77 945 141% 3,183 3.41 933 140% 3,598 3.98 904 135%
182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 881 111% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,845 4.77 806 102% 2,878 3.41 844 106% 2,850 3.98 716 90%
149 Barrington 556 996 179% 909 163% 41 6 22 85% 655 2,574 4.77 540 82% 2,558 3.41 750 115% 2,642 3.98 664 101%
103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 184 73% 14 2 22 95% 251 2,707 4.77 567 226% 2,329 3.41 683 272% 2,834 3.98 712 284%
104 Becker 524 208 40% 214 41% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,337 4.77 700 134% 3,403 3.41 998 191% 2,116 3.98 532 102%
105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 255 43% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,117 4.77 653 109% 3,054 3.41 896 150% 2,246 3.98 564 94%
106 Blanton 636 591 93% 667 105% 40 6 22 85% 636 3,052 4.77 640 101% 2,531 3.41 742 117% 2,723 3.98 684 108%
185 Blazier 598 775 130% 827 138% 38 6 22 85% 598 5,258 4.77 1,102 184% 3,203 3.41 939 157% 3,480 3.98 874 146%
170 Boone 752 501 67% 496 66% 42 6 22 95% 752 4,052 4.77 850 113% 2,887 3.41 847 113% 3,384 3.98 850 113%
107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 419 72% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,468 4.77 517 88% 2,447 3.41 718 123% 3,078 3.98 773 132%
108 Brooke 430 439 102% 449 104% 27 4 22 85% 430 2,363 4.77 495 115% 2,328 3.41 683 159% 2,743 3.98 689 160%
109 Brown 468 519 111% 480 103% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,944 4.77 827 177% 2,426 3.41 712 152% 3,139 3.98 789 169%
110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 283 104% 16 3 22 95% 272 2,296 4.77 481 177% 2,987 3.41 876 322% 2,307 3.98 580 213%
111 Campbell 524 360 69% 377 72% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,129 4.77 866 165% 3,030 3.41 889 170% 2,777 3.98 698 133%
173 Casey 711 669 94% 652 92% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,425 4.77 928 131% 3,055 3.41 896 126% 2,757 3.98 693 97%
112 Casis 669 825 123% 729 109% 38 6 22 95% 669 3,962 4.77 831 124% 2,588 3.41 759 113% 3,736 3.98 939 140%
184 Clayton 836 867 104% 734 88% 47 7 22 95% 836 4,282 4.77 898 107% 3,025 3.41 887 106% 3,576 3.98 898 107%
161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,173 209% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,242 4.77 680 121% 2,365 3.41 694 124% 3,375 3.98 848 151%
183 Cowan 669 783 117% 678 101% 37 5 22 95% 669 4,060 4.77 851 127% 2,985 3.41 875 131% 2,968 3.98 746 111%
113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 632 101% 35 5 22 95% 627 3,363 4.77 705 112% 2,518 3.41 738 118% 3,091 3.98 777 124%
179 Davis 731 683 93% 675 92% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,995 4.77 837 114% 3,047 3.41 894 122% 2,848 3.98 716 98%
114 Dawson 505 331 66% 279 55% 32 5 22 85% 505 2,470 4.77 518 103% 2,338 3.41 686 136% 2,121 3.98 533 106%
154 Doss 543 768 141% 679 125% 30 4 22 95% 543 4,623 4.77 969 178% 3,027 3.41 888 163% 2,925 3.98 735 135%
176 Galindo 711 704 99% 715 101% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,287 4.77 899 126% 3,041 3.41 892 125% 3,545 3.98 891 125%
116 Govalle 598 415 69% 450 75% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,570 4.77 749 125% 2,301 3.41 675 113% 2,225 3.98 559 93%
159 Graham 598 761 127% 759 127% 38 6 22 85% 598 4,280 4.77 897 150% 3,217 3.41 943 158% 3,068 3.98 771 129%
117 Gullett 418 541 129% 340 81% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,195 4.77 460 110% 2,401 3.41 704 168% 2,434 3.98 612 146%
118 Harris 542 758 140% 793 146% 34 5 22 85% 542 3,408 4.77 714 132% 2,267 3.41 665 123% 2,594 3.98 652 120%
163 Hart 711 898 126% 865 122% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,667 4.77 769 108% 3,040 3.41 892 125% 2,848 3.98 716 101%
119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 567 97% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,469 4.77 518 88% 2,514 3.41 737 126% 1,951 3.98 490 84%
155 Hill 627 732 117% 677 108% 35 5 22 95% 627 2,723 4.77 571 91% 2,456 3.41 720 115% 3,357 3.98 844 135%
162 Houston 692 915 132% 911 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 4,951 4.77 1,038 150% 3,483 3.41 1,021 148% 3,645 3.98 916 132%
178 Jordan 655 833 127% 672 103% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,159 4.77 872 133% 2,997 3.41 879 134% 2,807 3.98 705 108%
120 Joslin 374 363 97% 314 84% 24 4 22 85% 374 3,595 4.77 754 202% 2,375 3.41 696 186% 2,080 3.98 523 140%
180 Kiker 752 933 124% 866 115% 42 6 22 95% 752 3,779 4.77 792 105% 3,211 3.41 942 125% 2,782 3.98 699 93%
172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 676 100% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,292 4.77 900 134% 2,962 3.41 869 129% 3,561 3.98 895 133%
168 Langford 692 834 121% 914 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 2,881 4.77 604 87% 2,579 3.41 756 109% 2,519 3.98 633 91%
121 Lee 418 428 102% 293 70% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,059 4.77 432 103% 2,238 3.41 656 157% 2,647 3.98 665 159%
160 Linder 542 892 164% 906 167% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,738 4.77 574 106% 2,507 3.41 735 136% 2,322 3.98 584 108%
122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 302 85% 20 3 22 95% 355 2,470 4.77 518 146% 2,447 3.41 718 202% 1,941 3.98 488 137%
123 Mathews 397 405 102% 299 75% 23 4 22 95% 397 1,906 4.77 400 101% 2,377 3.41 697 176% 2,278 3.98 572 144%
165 McBee 580 765 132% 1,026 177% 36 5 22 85% 580 5,127 4.77 1,075 185% 3,045 3.41 893 154% 2,852 3.98 717 124%
147 Menchaca 606 686 113% 702 116% 34 5 22 95% 606 3,572 4.77 749 124% 2,501 3.41 734 121% 2,442 3.98 614 101%
124 Metz 542 498 92% 481 89% 34 5 22 85% 542 4,045 4.77 848 156% 3,013 3.41 884 163% 2,816 3.98 708 130%
181 Mills 794 928 117% 860 108% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,759 4.77 788 99% 3,052 3.41 895 113% 2,747 3.98 690 87%
150 Norman 486 333 68% 380 78% 30 4 22 85% 486 2,876 4.77 603 124% 2,259 3.41 662 136% 2,647 3.98 665 137%
148 Oak Hill 773 772 100% 783 101% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,567 4.77 957 124% 3,393 3.41 995 129% 3,330 3.98 837 108%
125 Oak Springs 411 274 67% 336 82% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,086 4.77 437 106% 2,985 3.41 875 213% 2,130 3.98 535 130%
156 Odom 542 658 121% 740 136% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,643 4.77 554 102% 2,421 3.41 710 131% 2,877 3.98 723 133%
126 Ortega 374 296 79% 263 70% 24 4 22 85% 374 2,734 4.77 573 153% 2,323 3.41 681 182% 1,468 3.98 369 99%
189 Overton 617 668 108% 904 146% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,148 4.77 870 141% 7,853 3.41 2,303 373% 3,560 3.98 894 145%
171 Palm 673 606 90% 687 102% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,189 4.77 878 130% 3,075 3.41 902 134% 3,757 3.98 944 140%
143 Patton 773 914 118% 894 116% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,849 4.77 1,017 131% 3,067 3.41 899 116% 3,542 3.98 890 115%
128 Pease 293 256 87% 0 0% 17 3 22 95% 293 1,307 4.77 274 94% 2,995 3.41 878 300% 1,468 3.98 369 126%
129 Pecan Springs 486 532 109% 520 107% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,220 4.77 675 139% 2,412 3.41 707 146% 2,986 3.98 750 154%
190 Perez 598 886 148% 864 144% 37 5 22 85% 598 4,158 4.77 872 146% 3,295 3.41 966 161% 3,467 3.98 871 146%
164 Pickle 617 740 120% 618 100% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,363 4.77 915 148% 9,153 3.41 2,684 435% 2,882 3.98 724 117%
151 Pillow 522 653 125% 617 118% 29 4 22 95% 522 2,761 4.77 579 111% 3,069 3.41 900 172% 2,282 3.98 573 110%
130 Pleasant Hill 524 619 118% 662 126% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,991 4.77 837 160% 3,022 3.41 886 169% 3,546 3.98 891 170%
131 Read Pre-K 393 509 129% 0 0% 23 - 18 95% 393 2,982 4.77 625 159% NA 3.41 NA NA 2,148 3.98 540 137%
132 Reilly 318 296 93% 342 108% 20 3 22 85% 318 2,287 4.77 479 151% 2,398 3.41 703 221% 1,637 3.98 411 129%
133 Ridgetop 206 219 106% 123 60% 13 2 22 85% 206 2,309 4.77 484 235% 2,336 3.41 685 333% 1,762 3.98 443 215%

11/11/2010 Page 1
 AISD Permanent Capacity

174 Rodriguez 711 910 128% 1,044 147% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,714 4.77 779 110% 3,056 3.41 896 126% 2,818 3.98 708 100%
127 Sanchez 580 585 101% 564 97% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,959 4.77 620 107% 2,399 3.41 704 121% 3,028 3.98 761 131%
139 Sims 355 277 78% 366 103% 22 3 22 85% 355 2,599 4.77 545 153% 2,484 3.41 728 205% 2,625 3.98 660 186%
136 St. Elmo 411 304 74% 407 99% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,825 4.77 592 144% 2,259 3.41 662 161% 3,149 3.98 791 192%
138 Summitt 731 854 117% 572 78% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,683 4.77 772 106% 3,064 3.41 898 123% 4,017 3.98 1,009 138%
158 Sunset Valley 561 451 80% 494 88% 35 5 22 85% 561 2,987 4.77 626 112% 2,376 3.41 697 124% 2,952 3.98 742 132%
140 Travis Heights 486 537 110% 556 114% 31 5 22 85% 486 2,992 4.77 627 129% 2,812 3.41 825 170% 1,962 3.98 493 101%
141 Walnut Creek 655 916 140% 918 140% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,721 4.77 990 151% 2,638 3.41 773 118% 3,706 3.98 931 142%
175 Widen 673 769 114% 834 124% 42 6 22 85% 673 3,851 4.77 807 120% 3,051 3.41 895 133% 3,363 3.98 845 126%
166 Williams 561 642 114% 728 130% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,040 4.77 637 114% 2,500 3.41 733 131% 2,923 3.98 734 131%
157 Winn 524 463 88% 601 115% 33 5 22 85% 524 2,565 4.77 538 103% 2,322 3.41 681 130% 2,348 3.98 590 113%
152 Wooldridge 524 878 168% 1,096 209% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,120 4.77 864 165% 2,580 3.41 757 145% 2,319 3.98 583 111%
144 Wooten 468 695 149% 740 158% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,534 4.77 741 158% 2,534 3.41 743 159% 3,036 3.98 763 163%
145 Zavala 580 407 70% 339 58% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,618 4.77 549 95% 2,740 3.41 804 139% 2,714 3.98 682 118%
146 Zilker 460 522 114% 329 72% 26 4 22 95% 460 2,894 4.77 607 132% 2,217 3.41 650 141% 2,703 3.98 679 148%
44,905 48,738 47,366

Cafeteria = 4,500 SF / 1,100 Students Gym = 13,400 SF / 1,100 Students Library = 4,800 SF / 1,100 Students
Classroom Capacity 4.10 SF per Student 12.18 SF per Student 4.36 SF per Student
Average
% of Perm. % of Perm. Special Students Capacity 12.18 SF Capacity Capacity
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2009-10 Capacity Classroom Rooms per Efficiency Classroom Café Area 4.10 SF per based on Café / Gym Area per based on Gym / Library 4.36 SF per based on Library /
LOC Middle Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop. Count (ES Only) Classroom Factor Capacity (SF) student Café Size Classroom (SF) student Gym Size Classroom Area (SF) student Library Size Classroom
59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 997 85% 56 0 28 75% 1,176 4,752 4.10 1,159 99% 13,668 12.18 1,122 95% 4,013 4.36 920 78%
54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,171 124% 48 0 28 70% 941 6,348 4.10 1,548 165% 11,555 12.18 949 101% 3,657 4.36 839 89%
46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,163 112% 53 0 28 70% 1,039 5,765 4.10 1,406 135% 11,877 12.18 975 94% 3,243 4.36 744 72%
57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 922 82% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,461 4.10 1,088 82% 13,935 12.18 1,144 86% 4,044 4.36 928 70%
55 Dobie 902 630 70% 709 79% 46 0 28 70% 902 4,790 4.10 1,168 130% 11,388 12.18 935 104% 3,553 4.36 815 90%
43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 898 83% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,452 4.10 1,330 123% 13,196 12.18 1,083 101% 4,127 4.36 947 88%
56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 801 66% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 5,220 4.10 1,273 105% 15,986 12.18 1,312 108% 4,666 4.36 1,070 88%
62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 943 71% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,669 4.10 1,139 86% 15,396 12.18 1,264 96% 5,616 4.36 1,288 97%
44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 563 42% 80 0 28 70% 1,568 4,433 4.10 1,081 69% 12,344 12.18 1,013 65% 4,499 4.36 1,032 66%
45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 554 55% 48 0 28 75% 1,008 6,725 4.10 1,640 163% 10,575 12.18 868 86% 3,665 4.36 841 83%
51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,070 133% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,022 4.10 981 122% 11,740 12.18 964 120% 2,983 4.36 684 85%
58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,224 101% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 4,501 4.10 1,098 90% 13,699 12.18 1,125 93% 4,044 4.36 928 76%
52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,187 107% 53 0 28 75% 1,113 4,879 4.10 1,190 107% 11,857 12.18 974 87% 3,413 4.36 783 70%
47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 764 81% 45 0 28 75% 945 5,199 4.10 1,268 134% 10,628 12.18 873 92% 3,147 4.36 722 76%
61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,123 97% 59 0 28 70% 1,156 5,953 4.10 1,452 126% 12,775 12.18 1,049 91% 2,798 4.36 642 55%
48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 683 63% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,057 4.10 1,234 114% 13,147 12.18 1,079 100% 4,293 4.36 985 91%
28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0% 44 0 28 75% 924 5,272 4.10 1,286 139% 11,751 12.18 965 104% 5,046 4.36 1,157 125%
60 Small 1,239 959 77% 873 70% 59 0 28 75% 1,239 6,244 4.10 1,523 123% 13,899 12.18 1,141 92% 3,142 4.36 721 58%
53 Webb 804 591 74% 692 86% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,348 4.10 1,061 132% 12,023 12.18 987 123% 4,399 4.36 1,009 126%
20,417 16,154 16,337

Cafeteria = 9,000 SF / 2,400 Students Gym = 20,720 SF / 2,400 Students Library = 8,400 SF / 2,400 Students
Classroom Capacity 3.75 SF per Student 8.63 SF per Student 3.50 SF per Student
Average School School School
% of Perm. % of Perm. Special Students Capacity Capacity Capacity
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2009-10 Capacity Classroom Rooms per Efficiency Classroom Café Area 3.75 SF per based on Café / Gym Area 8.63 SF per based on Gym / Library 3.50 SF per based on Library /
LOC High Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop. Count (ES Only) Classroom Factor Capacity (SF) student Café Size Classroom (SF) student Gym Size Classroom Area (SF) student Library Size Classroom
17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,076 128% 114 0 28 75% 2,394 10,935 3.75 2,916 122% 21,471 8.63 2,488 104% 8,371 3.50 2,392 100%
9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,912 95% 113 0 28 75% 2,373 8,178 3.75 2,181 92% 17,068 8.63 1,978 83% 9,864 3.50 2,818 119%
2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,964 89% 105 0 28 75% 2,205 10,074 3.75 2,686 122% 17,488 8.63 2,026 92% 5,977 3.50 1,708 77%
13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,594 102% 142 0 28 75% 2,982 9,200 3.75 2,453 82% 22,036 8.63 2,553 86% 9,862 3.50 2,818 94%
8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,927 89% 103 0 28 75% 2,163 8,955 3.75 2,388 110% 17,050 8.63 1,976 91% 7,671 3.50 2,192 101%
EMHSJC /
19/20/29 International 1,548 894 58% 1,310 85% 79 0 28 70% 1,548 8,952 3.75 2,387 154% 16,419 8.63 1,903 123% 6,106 3.50 1,745 113%
15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0% 18 0 28 75% 378 1,834 3.75 489 129% 2,282 8.63 264 70% 1,223 3.50 349 92%
4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 2,037 125% 83 0 28 70% 1,627 13,513 3.75 3,603 221% 23,465 8.63 2,719 167% 7,677 3.50 2,194 135%
14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,110 60% 94 0 28 70% 1,842 8,026 3.75 2,140 116% 18,936 8.63 2,194 119% 8,856 3.50 2,530 137%
5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,343 84% 76 0 28 75% 1,596 6,244 3.75 1,665 104% 15,765 8.63 1,827 114% 6,981 3.50 1,994 125%
6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,597 101% 81 0 28 70% 1,588 8,600 3.75 2,293 144% 22,180 8.63 2,570 162% 6,226 3.50 1,779 112%
7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,994 107% 95 0 28 70% 1,862 9,462 3.75 2,523 136% 14,870 8.63 1,723 93% 7,017 3.50 2,005 108%
21,698 20,512 20,864

11/11/2010 Page 2
 2010 Population Update

% of Perm. % of Perm.
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2010-11 Capacity
LOC Elementary Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop.
142 Allan 673 379 56% 354 53%
101 Allison 486 543 112% 585 120%
102 Andrews 486 717 147% 692 142%
187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 557 83%
182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 891 112%
149 Barrington 556 996 179% 955 172%
103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 203 81%
104 Becker 524 208 40% 226 43%
105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 288 48%
106 Blanton 636 591 93% 630 99%
185 Blazier 598 775 130% 896 150%
170 Boone 752 501 67% 478 64%
107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 456 78%
108 Brooke 430 439 102% 441 103%
109 Brown 468 519 111% 525 112%
110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 312 115%
111 Campbell 524 360 69% 367 70%
173 Casey 711 669 94% 763 107%
112 Casis 669 825 123% 731 109%
184 Clayton 836 867 104% 837 100%
161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,252 223%
183 Cowan 669 783 117% 707 106%
113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 573 91%
179 Davis 731 683 93% 666 91%
114 Dawson 505 331 66% 276 55%
154 Doss 543 768 141% 728 134%
176 Galindo 711 704 99% 689 97%
116 Govalle 598 415 69% 452 76%
159 Graham 598 761 127% 825 138%
117 Gullett 418 541 129% 325 78%
118 Harris 542 758 140% 755 139%
163 Hart 711 898 126% 888 125%
119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 599 102%
155 Hill 627 732 117% 714 114%
162 Houston 692 915 132% 897 130%
178 Jordan 655 833 127% 706 108%
120 Joslin 374 363 97% 329 88%
180 Kiker 752 933 124% 883 117%
172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 687 102%
168 Langford 692 834 121% 895 129%
121 Lee 418 428 102% 308 74%
160 Linder 542 892 164% 956 176%
122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 300 84%
123 Mathews 397 405 102% 284 72%

01/26/2011 Page 3
 2010 Population Update

165 McBee 580 765 132% 1,031 178%

147 Menchaca 606 686 113% 685 113%
124 Metz 542 498 92% 477 88%
181 Mills 794 928 117% 831 105%
150 Norman 486 333 68% 376 77%
148 Oak Hill 773 772 100% 820 106%
125 Oak Springs 411 274 67% 293 71%
156 Odom 542 658 121% 706 130%
126 Ortega 374 296 79% 266 71%
189 Overton 617 668 108% 948 154%
171 Palm 673 606 90% 637 95%
143 Patton 773 914 118% 908 117%
128 Pease 293 256 87% 0 0%
129 Pecan Springs 486 532 109% 490 101%
190 Perez 598 886 148% 945 158%
164 Pickle 617 740 120% 737 119%
151 Pillow 522 653 125% 651 125%
130 Pleasant Hill 524 619 118% 631 121%
131 Read Pre-K 393 509 129% 0 0%
132 Reilly 318 296 93% 357 112%
133 Ridgetop 206 219 106% 128 62%
174 Rodriguez 711 910 128% 1,045 147%
127 Sanchez 580 585 101% 584 101%
139 Sims 355 277 78% 343 97%
136 St. Elmo 411 304 74% 369 90%
138 Summitt 731 854 117% 623 85%
158 Sunset Valley 561 451 80% 483 86%
140 Travis Heights 486 537 110% 548 113%
141 Walnut Creek 655 916 140% 936 143%
175 Widen 673 769 114% 794 118%
166 Williams 561 642 114% 640 114%
157 Winn 524 463 88% 485 93%
152 Wooldridge 524 878 168% 1,160 222%
144 Wooten 468 695 149% 672 144%
145 Zavala 580 407 70% 347 60%
146 Zilker 460 522 114% 338 74%
44,905 48,738 48,165

01/26/2011 Page 4
 2010 Population Update

% of Perm. % of Perm.
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2010-11 Capacity
LOC Middle Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop.
59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 979 83%
54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,219 130%
46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,170 113%
57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 905 80%
55 Dobie 902 630 70% 719 80%
43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 850 79%
56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 829 68%
62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 989 75%
44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 541 41%
45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 583 58%
51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,056 131%
58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,266 104%
52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,171 105%
47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 804 85%
61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,165 101%
48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 712 66%
28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0%
60 Small 1,239 959 77% 876 71%
53 Webb 804 591 74% 731 91%
20,417 16,154 16,565

% of Perm. % of Perm.
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2010-11 Capacity
LOC High Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop.
17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,092 129%
9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,962 97%
2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,958 89%
13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,606 103%
8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,883 87%
EMHSJC /
19/20/29 International 1,548 894 58% 1,249 81%
15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0%
4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 1,981 122%
14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,083 59%
5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,316 82%
6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,552 98%
7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,902 102%
21,698 20,512 20,584

01/26/2011 Page 5
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendix C
Visioning Workshop Summary
May 13 & 14, 2010

AUSTIN ISD
Facility Master Plan
Visioning Workshop
 Acknowledgements
Cuningham Group Architecture P.A., as a consultant to DeJONG-RICHTER, prepared this document with
the support and assistance of the following Facility Master Plan Vision Workshop participants:

John Alawneh AISD - Technology

Tony Arnold City of Austin – Parks & Recreation
John Blazier Business Partner
Kathrin Brewer Austin Partners in Education
Bill Caritij AISD - Chief Accountability
Meria Carstarphen AISD - Superintendent
Nan Clayton Former AISD Board Member
Ariel Cloud AISD – Asst. Superintendent Elementary
Nicole Conley-Abram AISD - CFO
Tommy Cowan Business Partner
Paul Cruz Chief of Schools
Ashton Cumberbatch Community Seton Hospital
Elizabeth Dickey AISD Special Education
Bill De Dufour AISD - Technology
Richard Frazier AISD – Teacher / Task Force Chair
Janna Griffin Asst. Supt. Office - Elementary
Janis Guerrero AISD – Community Relations
Bergeron Harris AISD – Asst. Supt. Middle Schools
Janna Lilly AISD – Special Education
Viviana Lopez AISD – Curriculum/Special Projects
Eliza May Community
Janet Mitchell Community – Task Force Chair
Chris Moore City of Austin – Child Safety
Jaqui Porter Early Childhood
Geronimo Rodriguez Community – Seton Hospital
Curt Shaw Director of Construction Management
Karen Sperry AISD – Chief of Staff
Paul Turner AISD – Executive Director of Facilities
Gloria Williams AISD – Community Education
Cora Wright City of Austin – Parks & Recreation

Other Participants
Pat Rossett AISD – Assistant Director Bond Services
Carolyn Staskiewicz DeJONG-RICHTER
Eric Sheppard Magellan Inc
Steven Kapeller BLGY Architecture
Benny Hawkins BLGY Architecture
Meg Parsons Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A.
Tim Dufault Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A.

1
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Table of Contents

Introduction

Day One
A. Greatest Hopes
B. Provocation I: Sir Ken Robinson
C. Issues & Assets
D. Provocation II: School of One
E. I See…We See…
F. Facility Master Plan Vision Statement
G. Provocation III: Environment Matters
H. Values: AISD Strategic Plan 2010-2015 Review
I. Story Time

Day Two
A. Reflections
B. Provocation III: John A. Johnson
C. Facility Principles

Appendices
A. Day One Presentation
B. Day Two Presentation
C. Final Presentation
D. Photos

2
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Introduction
This document is the result of a Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop held May 13th & 14th, 2010 with
participants from the Austin Independent School District and the community. The purpose of this workshop
was to create a Facility Master Plan Vision Statement and Facility Principles.

The purpose of a Facility Master Plan is to create a clear and compelling vision of the future for AISD,
aligning facilities with learning. A Facility Master Plan Vision Statement creates a filter by which future
decisions can be made and Facility Principles create overarching ideas about what‟s important for all
schools in AISD.

The process used during the Visioning Workshop was interactive and included “Provocations” and small
and whole group work. The following is a summary of our work during both days.

3
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Greatest Hopes:
Day one started with participants sharing their Greatest Hopes for the Facility Master Planning process.
Below are some of the hopes shared by participants:

4
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Provocation I: Sir Ken Robinson: Do Schools Kill Creativity?

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html

Reactions to the video included the following:

 Learning occurs in many ways – public education focuses on academic achievement
 Career/Vocational Education is not emphasized but some children want – we need to provide the right
programs for all children
 The system is structurally set up to fail some children – there are ethnocentric, gender, and cultural
differences we need to consider
 Everyone learns differently
 Focus on where students can be successful through application
 Plan for the future but not at the expense of today
 There is a knowing/doing gap in education – establish the courage to do what we know is right – “thou shalt”
…accountability
 We continue to build boxes for people to teach in that look the same – we need more flexible, collaborative
spaces
 We need to respond to changes in the world; we need to be agile and our environment affects us
 The challenge is that we have given critical responsibility to one group of adults: teachers; we need to
consider the role of parents and the community to create creative thinkers. Open possibilities for kids to
learn from and in whole world – engage the community

5
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Issues & Assets

We discussed and prioritized Issues and Assets in Austin ISD. This was a way to find out what was
important to those present and what they thought were key to the success of a Facilities Master Plan. As is
noted below on the sheets the key issues identified were:
 Equity of facilities and resources across the district
 Efficient use of resources throughout the community
 Partnering
 Future flexibility for teaching in the future
 Competition and school choices (Middle class participates in public schools but they have other
choices)
 School boundaries

6
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Provocation II: School of One

http://schools.nyc.gov/community/innovation/SchoolofOne/default.htm

The group watched a video on the School of One, a program that started the summer of 2009, in New York
City.

From the above website:

“The mission of School of One is to provide students with personalized, effective, and dynamic classroom
instruction so that teachers have more time to focus on the quality of their instruction.
To achieve this mission, School of One re-imagines the traditional classroom model. Instead of one teacher
and 25-30 students in a classroom, each student participates in multiple instructional modalities, including a
combination of teacher-led instruction, one-on-one tutoring, independent learning, and work with virtual
tutors.

To organize this type of learning, each student receives a unique daily schedule based on his or her
academic strengths and needs. As a result, students within the same school or even the same classroom
can receive profoundly different instruction as each student‟s schedule is tailored to the skills they need and
the ways they best learn. Teachers acquire data about student achievement each day and then adapt their
live instructional lessons accordingly

By leveraging technology to play a more essential role in planning instruction, teachers have more time to
focus on doing what they do best - delivering quality instruction and ensuring that all students learn.”

7
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Activity I: I See…We See…

“Vision is the art of seeing the invisible” Jonathan Swift

To start the visioning process we asked participants to „imagine it‟s 10 years out, the AISD Facility Master
Plan has given the district amazing learning places that reflect the community and help the district
accomplish its mission. People visit because its facilities are so successful in accomplishing the goals of
the District. Imagine you‟re giving someone a tour – what do you see?‟

Individually participants created I See statements:

 One-on-one time with teachers
 Entire staff focused and engaged with kids
 Teachers focused on teaching the kids and not other issues
 Schools are the pride of the community and the first choice of middle class families
 Large yet flexible spaces built to fit our growing population
 Repurposed spaces that are vintage yet functional for the community
 All facilities are beautifully maintained and are supportive of the instructional programs
 All schools are painted in bright colors – place of exciting learning
 A dramatically reduced number of schools, yet a mix of small, medium, and large facilities
 50 years later the space is still current (or can be)
 Public and private, city and school district co-location of offices, classrooms, theaters, and meeting areas
 Art facilities which involve all our students and the world class Austin arts community in a learning partnership
 Shared facilities with the city Zachary Scott Theater, Long Center, AT&T, IBM, CAN. ACC – classroom days around
and within the city
 Students integrated within the community, downtown, capitol, tech companies, Whole Foods; “what do you do days”
 Students a large part of the day as interns and apprentices
 Schools have clear feeder patterns and each feeder pattern has a special focus
 Engaged, enthusiastic students that want to be there. Eager to explain their love for learning.
 Loud sounds from playing and team problems solving
 Quiet places for reading and silent learning contemplation
 Team sports, yoga, and meditation
 Wall-sized white boards for drawing ideas and solutions (graffiti on buildings)
 Integrated learning (curriculum) across multiple learning environments
 Teachers focused on each child‟s learning style and developing and delivering in small groups to that style on a
fundamental goal
 Subjects based on student career goals
 Teams of students involved in projects using technology
 Students in a variety of “work spaces “ to complete team projects
 Teachers facilitating the learning for students with technology as a major focus
 Fifteen-to eighteen-hour campuses that engage all ages of the community from senior populations to immigrant
populations teaching each other, weekend festivals, performing arts with the community
 Partnerships with the community, government and schools to achieve educational goals
 Schools that are useable by the community – computers, gymnasiums, weight room
 Teachers adept at teaching with technology, smart boards that are interactive, advanced projection systems with
students to share their work
 Computer-directed programs that include collaboration and relationships
 Furniture that is moveable and easily configured to adapt to a lesson
 Wall space for student work display
 Work space for problem solving – environmental issues
 Students interacting with each other and the instructor in a well lit, clean, environmentally comfortable space
 Recreational and athletic facilities that are available in all communities resulting from partnerships with public and
private entities that support youth and adult education
8
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

 Schools that welcome visitors and are responsive to visitors

 Classrooms that are interactive include technology but also instructionally interactive – kids engaged with each other
and teacher
 All students have internet access at home
 Staff, students and parents can readily access results and academic plans
 Students have exactly the information they need in the best format
 Realization of the promise of “instructional TV” to help teachers with complex, real world concepts such velocity,
acceleration, gravity, history of Middle Eastern areas, areas on curves, environmental science, poetry etc…
 Virtual lab for HS students to work on course credits. Teachers as side facilitators.
 As I walk through the facility I see a number of distant learning centers where students and teachers participating in a
collaborative learning process. These rooms have state of the art technology.
 State of the art facilities on each campus and two district-wide performing art centers
 Students attend neighborhood schools as best opportunity
 Classroom instruction that accommodates different student learning styles and provides support and enrichment based
on student learning needs
 Stimulating and inviting learning environments that are fun to be in
 Inviting/welcoming face to the facility
 Parents working with students throughout the school
 Spaces for collaboration between teachers, parents and students
 Parents present, actively engaged, knowing learning goals of students
 Space for community/parents to be engaged
 Outside area is an extension of the learning environment
 Students learning in flexible indoor and outdoor spaces
 Gardens, fountains and trails instead of carpet and grass
 Active learning
 Classrooms that make use of indoor and outdoor settings for learning
 Students moving and active in the learning process
 Students actively engaged in their learning
 Classrooms which comfortably hold 30 students in a variety of ways
 Students working in small groups collaboratively
 I see building design geared towards multi-sensory student engagement
 A clean, well maintained visually appealing school for every student
 Tables instead of desks
 Classrooms are organized into learning centers
 Apprenticeships for vocational education
 Learners engaged in community activities and project learning
 Government classes sponsor a bill/resolution at the capital
 Spaces for volunteers from collaborative agencies
 Libraries that allow students to access the world beyond their classroom
 Community of instructors…local, expert, university, etc…
 Space for group performances in every school
 Culturally relevant artwork and displays
 Technology is natural (organic part of the learning process
 Facilities and technology and resources accessible for all
 Classrooms where students have access to technology and its use is integrated into all areas
 Students skilled at technology for gaining, sharing, linking, creating information
 Multiple technology resources in every classroom
 Science and math labs which allow for technology and hands on activities
 I Pad technology instead of paper
 Learning spaces for teachers and administrators
 Adequate work space for all staff
 Multi use meeting spaces
 Less office space – more multi-purpose spaces
 All space is special education space based on IEP (Individual Education Plan) for every child
9
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

 Social skills training as part the degree program (such as mediation training)
 Flex schedules for students in high school
 Young children given the time and opportunity to learn through play
 Access to all resources within a school for every student
 Curriculum that is differentiated to fit individuals needs and flexible schedules to allow the best use of time
 Secondary classrooms that allow for small group work (not just rows of chairs)
 A flower bed at the entrance of school, there are trees that have been pruned, and doors have been painted recently
and rooms are brightly painted, there are posters on the walls along with student work. The facilities reflect attention to
detail
 As we enter the library, there is a bank of computers and students working in small groups accessing databases from
around the world. The students are engaged and the noise level is amazingly semi quiet.
 Technology driven learning in every classroom in AISD facility
 Language development academy, producing fluent 2nd and 3rd language proficiency
 Fine arts integrated with academics integrated with social learning
 Music academy generating music professionals, singers, etc.
 Spaces that are student/teacher friendly
 Teachers interacting with students
 Community advocate centers/service for students and family members
 Learning centers for 0 to 4-year olds
 All students actively involved in learning
 Collaboration between AISD and ACC that produces HS graduates interested in graduation with certificates in medical
technology, nursing, construction, etc…
 Central headquarters reduced in physical size, in more compact, effective structure
 Substantial revenue generated from space use that can be reinvested into important programming
 Private and corporate donation to AISD foundation in excess of $50 million
 Number-one rated HS in the country in Austin due to technology or live music/jazz, band or other with an awesome
facility/stages, media rooms, etc…

I See Wordle
www.wordle.net

Wordle is a program that

generates “word clouds”
from text. The clouds give
greater prominence to
words that appear more
frequently in the source
text. The Wordle to the left
was generated from all the
I See statements
contributed by participants

10
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

In small groups participants then shared these I See… statements and created We See… statements.
Listed below are the We see… statements worked on by participants in small groups. These became the
basis of the Vision Statement.

We see…..
 An overall environment that is both encouraging and engaging
 Purposeful, functional, modular facilities that serve all students needs
 Facilities “co-purposed” for student and community usage
 Teachers totally focused on education and innovation

Students in a variety of learning environments with technology support, integrated to ensure development
of individual learning styles and goals, supported by community partnerships on an ongoing basis (24/7)

Facilities that are inviting, welcoming, flexible enough to accommodate and support a variety of instructional
arrangements and incorporates:
 instructional technology
 family and community access to information
 teacher access to information and resources

 Facilities with dedicated spaces to foster and engage parents/community

 Facilities that use the outdoors and indoors in ways that are environmentally responsible and
allows for learning to take place in a variety of ways
 Facilities that engage with the community to provide extended learning opportunities both within
the school walls and beyond
 Classrooms large enough to allow for flex grouping and active hands-on learning
 A variety of multi-use areas
 Facilities where technology is integrated in every space and accessible to all students and staff
 Spaces that allow for differentiated instruction and flexible school day

Environment: small group instruction spaces, flower beds, natural light, storage areas and no portable
buildings (beautiful physical space high quality learning is norm)

Special Programs: Single gender/ single-grade academies, partnerships with higher learning for
career/vocational skill development, family resource centers, fine arts, language academies and early
childhood centers

Technology: Virtual/distance learning, IPad/electronic text-books

Central Office: More compact space

Revenue: Space used (for partnerships, co-locations in underutilized space) Private and corporate gifts –
Austin-based celebrities

11
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

12
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Facility Master Plan Vision Statement

The purpose of a vision statement is to guide the entire process, help set priorities, align resources against
priorities and facilitate an efficient decision making process. The following vision statement was created by
participants from the work done together:

All AISD schools inspire high student achievement and common

community goals through inviting, accessible, and efficient facilities that
integrate technology and sustainability.

Revised Version:

All AISD schools will inspire high student achievement

and support common community goals through equitable,
inviting facilities that integrate technology and are
optimally used, accessible, sustainable, and meet highest
educational adequacy standards.

13
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Provocation III: Environment Matters

“The only true voyage of discovery consists not of visiting new places, but seeing with new eyes.”
Voltaire

As a part of the process of thinking about the future of Austin schools, the group looked at learning styles,
the learning environment and current examples of what other districts are doing with their facilities. Below
are examples of what was discussed. The presentation is included in the May 13th presentation in the
appendix of this document.

14
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Values
Building on the work that has already been done in the District we reviewed the Austin ISD Strategic Plan
and expanded on the Values contained in the Plan:

AISD Strategic Plan 2010-2015:

Mission (What We Do)

In partnership with parents and our community, AISD exists to provide a comprehensive educational
experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to
society.

Vision (Where We Want to Be)

AISD will be nationally recognized as an outstanding school district, instilling a passion for life-long learning
in all students.

Goals (What We Want to Accomplish)

 Goal 1: All students will perform at or above grade level.
 Goal 2: Achievement gaps among all student groups will be eliminated.
 Goal 3: All students will graduate ready for college, career, and life in a globally competitive economy.
 Goal 4: All schools will meet or exceed state accouintability standards, and the district will meet federal
standards and exceed state standards.

Strategies (How We Will Achieve Our Goals)

 Provide a high-quality, well-rounded educational experience to all students that is rigorous, culturally
relevant, healthful, and engaging.
 Build strong relationships with students, families, and the community to increase trust and shared
responsibility.
 Ensure that every classroom has a high-quality, effective educator, supported by high-quality, effective
administrators and support staff.
 Align resources to accomplish priorities within a balanced budget.

Values (What We Believe In)

 Focus on Children
 Excellence
 Integrity
 Equity
 Respect
 Health and Safety

15
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

16
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

17
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Story Time
As a way to think more about how learning will happen in the future and what role the facilities play,
participants were asked to work in small groups and answer the following question:

Imagine it is 2020 and AISD has met its strategic plan goals for 2015 and has addressed many of the key
facility needs as defined in the Facility Master Plan of 2010.

Imagine you are (a student, a community member, a teacher, a staff member) Describe your typical day in
an AISD school – what does your day look like?

1. What are you doing? What is the process of learning and what are the outcomes or expectations?
2. Who are you with? How is your day organized?
3. What is your environment like? Where are you and how do you feel?
4. What makes AISD a special place to learn?

18
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Day Two: Reflections

While Day One was about creating a Facility Master Plan Vision Statement, Day Two of the workshop
was about creating Facility Principles. Facility Principles create overarching ideas about what‟s
important for all schools in AISD.

To start off Day Two the group reflected on Day One and on a video assigned as homework:
Dave Eggers‟ Wish: Once Upon a School.
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dave_eggers_makes_his_ted_prize_wish_once_upon_a_school.html

19
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Provocation IV: John A. Johnson

From the KnowledgeWorks website: http://www.kwfdn.org/resource_library/_resources/sacc_video_guide.asp

"Schools as Centers of Community: John A. Johnson Achievement Plus Elementary School” is a video
case study and discussion guide that assists local leaders and residents in creating constructive,
meaningful dialogue on the importance of good school design and ways schools can become centers
of their communities. KnowledgeWorks Foundation partnered with the American Architectural
Foundation to create the guide and video.

Video link:
http://www.archfoundation.org/aaf/gsbd/Videos.SCC.htm

20
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Facility Principles
Starting with the Austin ISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan Strategies, participants worked in small groups to
define Facility Principles. Facility Principles are overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in
the Austin Independent School District.

For each of the Strategies groups defined what this meant for facilities. So, for example, if the Austin ISD is
committed to an engaging/healthy experience for all students, this means what in terms of facilities.

21
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Facility Principles

The Austin Independent School District is committed to

An engaging/healthy experience for all students …

This means…
• All schools will have a space identified to engage parents and be responsive to student needs
(learning/language/cultural/socioeconomic)
• All schools will have spaces dedicated to active learning and diverse learning styles
• All schools will be equipped to provide technology resources in classrooms and other learning
areas
• Create and maintain clean and attractive grounds that encourage physical activities
• Provide safe entry and exit for cyclists, walkers, skateboarders, etc.
• Develop spaces that promote social and recreational interaction
• Common areas for active, hands-on group activities
• Coordinate and cooperate with other entities (YMCA, YWCA, Parks & Recreation) to share and/or
build new facilities (pools, gyms, parks)
• All schools will have good indoor air quality, climate control, and day-lighting
• Our facilities will support high quality, rigorous, well rounded learning

22
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Facility Principles

The Austin Independent School District is committed to

Strong relationships with students/families/community …

This means…
• Community hubs for services and programs
• Flexible spaces and hours to accommodate changes in learning styles, instructional delivery
supported by technological resources for students, families and communities
• Facilities to provide learning spaces that support student collaboration, teamwork and relationship
building

23
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Facility Principles

The Austin Independent School District is committed to

Supporting and engaging high quality effective staff …

This means…
• AISD facility decisions promote long-term value
• AISD facilities should be equitable and adequate across the district
• AISD staff and community must have input into facility decisions to ensure adequate resources
(examples: space, storage, technology, outlets)
• AISD facilities to provide high quality professional development spaces
• AISD facilities must provide an appropriate environment for staff effectiveness (example: HVAC,
light, acoustics, security)
• AISD facilities must include adequate, flexible-use core facilities (library, gym, cafeteria)
• AISD staff must have appropriate access to various spaces to meet student needs of a high quality
rigorous educational experience

24
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Facility Principles

The Austin Independent School District is committed to

Aligning resources with priorities…

This means…
• Leverage Austin public and private resources for more effective and efficient use of existing and
new facilities by:
• Revisit efficiency study
• Align decisions with fiscal impact statement
• “CAN” concept (Community Action Network) to engage various public entities (e.g. UT, ACC,
Travis County, Seton, St. David‟s, etc…) for purpose of repurposing facilities including charters and
co-location
• Must at least break even or generate revenue
• Strategy for maintenance and operations to support facilities and address deferred, routine, and
preventative maintenance
• Develop detailed capital plan schedule/report that includes budget/actuals/completion dates and M
& O impact by project
• CAN concept must be integrated into bond planning process to address shared facilities and a
more comprehensive set of services
• Develop strategic partnerships to obtain private donations /endowments in excess of $50 million

25
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

26
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Appendices
Contained on the following pages are the presentations from both days.

27
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

28
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

29
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

30
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

31
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

32
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

33
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

34
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

35
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

36
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

37
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

38
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

39
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

40
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

41
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

42
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

43
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

44
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

45
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

46
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

47
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

48
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

49
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

50
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

51
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

52
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

53
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

54
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

55
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

56
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

57
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

58
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

59
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

60
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

61
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

62
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

63
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

64
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

65
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

66
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

67
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

68
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

69
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

70
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

71
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

72
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

73
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

74
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

75
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

76
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

77
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

78
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

79
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Photos taken during the Workshop

80
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

81
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

82
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

83
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

84
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

85
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

86
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

87
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

88
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

89
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

90
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

91
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

92
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

93
 AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendices D, E, and F
Appendix D: Community Dialogue #1 Results
Appendix E: Community Dialogue #2 Results
Appendix F: Community Meeting #3 Results

Due to the volume of these reports, see the following link to access this information:

http://rcpt.yousendit.com/1042147173/d50a3fb54a75365c932c5df95adbd0c4
 AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendix G
Summary of Facility Options Discussed by the FMPTF
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Cut all bus service for magnet schools and signature
0.1 programs $1,994,516
Redraw boundaries for the entire district with the
0.2 greatest weight on vertical alignment Unknown Unknown $0
Move International HS from Eastside HS to ALC. Relocate
ALC students to Blackshear ES. Move Blachsear ES
0.4 students to Zavala ES Unknown $0 $0
Repurpose Allan ES as a Pre-K thru 8 and move Allison ES
attendance area middle school students from Martin MS
0.5 to Allan Pre-K-8 Unknown $0 $0

Repurpose Blackshear ES to a Pre-K - 8 school, and Oak

Springs ES as a Pre-K - 6th, move middle school students
0.6 from these attendance zones from Kealing MS Unknown $0 $0
Repurpose Campbell ES as a Pre-K -8th school and move
middle school students from Kealing MS to Campbell Pre-
0.7 K-8th Unknown $0 $0
Repurpose Brentwood ES as a Pre-K-6th school, move
sixth grade students in this attendance zone from Lamar
0.8 MS to Brentwood PreK-6 School Unknown $0 $0

Repurpose Zavala ES to a Pre-K-8th school and move

0.9 middle school students from Martin MS to the new school Unknown $0 $0
Add a sixth grade class to Metz ES, Govalle ES, Ortega ES,
Norman ES, and Sims ES, move sixth grade students from
0.10 Martin MS and Garcia MS. Unknown $0 $0

Assuming all changes in options 0.5 through 0.10 are

made, repurpose Martin MS as adminstrative center.
Move remaining Martin students to Kealing MS. Remove
magnet program from Kealing MS. Move 500 students to
Lamar MS and 300 students to Covington MS. Move
middle schol population of Cowan ES from Covington
0.11 MS to Bailey MS. Unknown $0 $0
Reassign portion of students from Small MS to Gorzycki
0.13 MS $0 $0 $0

Purchase shopping center with adequate space for all

district adminstrative functions and a movie theater for a
Performing Arts Center. Sell CAC and discontinue all
0.14 leases. Rent the PAC when not in use. $0
Charge a fee for general transfers, reducing fee for low-
0.15 income families Unknown $0 $0

Move the media center and professional library services

0.16 together with PDC for better utilization of resources Unknown TBD TBD
0.17 Build three new elementary schools - Undesignated $0 $0 $79,700,000
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Build a new middle school - Southeast (land funded from
0.18 previous bond) $0 $0 $55,700,000
Build a new high school - South (land funded from
0.19 previous bond) $0 $0 $106,600,000
0.20 School for Young Men

Global option to remove 6th grade from all elementary

0.21 schools when room is available in middle schools
Consolidate Reilly ES and Ridgetop ES at a new school
1.1 built on the Reilly ES site $2,076,204 $7,734,391 $24,000,000
1.2 Reassign students from Brown ES to Reilly ES $0 $0 $0
Move a portion of student population from Cowan ES to
2.1 Boone ES ($72,607) $0 $0
Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES
2.2 and Boone ES $1,259,273 $8,466,116 $0

Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES.

2.2A Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES $1,259,273 $8,466,116 $0
Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES.
Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES
and Cunningham ES. Adjust boundaries between
2.2 B Cowan ES and Boone ES. $1,266,595 $8,466,116 $0
Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES.
Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES
2.2 C and Cunningham ES. $1,266,595 $8,466,116 $0
Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES.
Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES
2.2 D and Cunningham ES. $1,276,967 $8,466,116 $0
Adjust boundaries between Mills ES, Patton ES, and
2.3 Boone ES ($59,185) $0 $0
Adjust boundaries between Williams ES and Cunningham
2.4 ES ($2,241) $0 $0

2.5 Adjust boundaries between Odom ES and St Elmo ES $0 $0 $0

Close Oak Springs ES and Zavala ES and consolidate into
3.1 Blackshear ES and Govalle ES $2,369,043 $10,681,507 $0
Close Allan ES and move students into Govalle ES and
3.2 Norman ES $1,257,574 $11,546,218 $0

Close Allan ES and repurpose as an administrative

building. Move student population to Govalle ES and
Norman ES, adjust boundaries of Oak Springs ES, Zavala
3.2B ES, Brooke ES and Ortega ES $1,257,574 $0 $0
Close Zavala ES and Brooke ES move students into a new
elementary school. Close Allan ES and move students
3.3 into Govalle ES, Norman ES, and Ortega ES $3,843,266 $23,479,180 $28,100,000
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact

3.4 Adjust boundaries for Maplewood ES and Campbell ES $0 $0 $0

Close Oak Springs ES and Ortega ES and consolidate

3.5 students into Blackshear ES, Sims ES, and Norman ES $2,300,842 $10,308,022 $0
3.6 Close Pease ES $712,296 $7,302,501 $0
Close Govalle ES and Oak Springs ES and move students
3.7 to Allan ES, Zavala ES, and Blackshear ES $2,510,507 $16,136,129 $0

Repurpose Blackshear ES as a Hutson-Tillotson

3.8 demonstration school, training site for future teachers $0 $0 $0
Close Brooke ES and move students to Allan ES and
Zavala ES. Adjust boundary between Allan ES and
3.9 A Norman ES. $1,301,382 $5,477,387 $0
3.9 B1 Close Ortega ES and move students to Govalle ES. $1,153,873 $6,082,090 $0
Close Oak Springs ES and move students to Blackshear
3.9 B2 ES. $1,146,969 $4,225,932 $0

Close Sanchez ES and move students north of Town Lake

to Zavala ES and Metz ES. Adjust boundaries between
Zavala ES and Linder ES. Build a new 800-student
elementary south of Town Lake to receive students from * included in
3.9 C Sanchez ES, Metz ES and Travis Heights ES. $1,556,924 $9,424,688 Option 0.17

Close Allan ES and repurpose as a middle school for

Young Men, repurpose Martin MS as a middle school for
Young Women. Reassign Allan ES students to Govalle ES,
3.12 Ortega ES and Norman ES $12,203 $0 $15,389,258
Close Govalle ES and reassign students to Ortega ES,
3.13 Oak Springs ES and Allan ES $1,363,538 $11,910,197 $0
Close Blackshear ES and reassign students to Oak Springs
3.14 ES and Zavala ES $984,538 $7,291,599 $0

Close Govalle ES and reassign students to Brooke ES,

Ortega ES and Oak Springs ES. Close Allan ES and
reassign students to Brooke ES and Norman ES. Adjust
3.16 boundaries between Brooke ES and Zavala ES. $2,873,104 $23,456,415 $0
4.1A Close Dawson ES and move students to Becker ES $1,422,157 $6,110,749 $0
Close Becker ES and move student population to
4.1B Dawson ES $1,422,157 $7,036,234 $0
Close Becker ES, Barton Hills ES, and Zilker ES and
4.2 consolidate into new elementary school $3,282,691 $24,580,169 $28,100,000
Adjust boundaries between Becker ES, Dawson ES, Travis
4.3 Heights ES, and Linder ES ($80,539) $0 $0
Close Barton Hills ES and Becker ES and move students
4.4A into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,201,810 $11,930,384 $0
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Close Barton Hills ES and Zilker ES and move students to
4.4B Becker ES and Dawson ES. $2,266,637 $17,543,935 $0
Close Barton Hills ES and Becker ES and move students
4.5 into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,207,301 $11,930,384 $0
Close Barton Hills ES and Joslin ES and move students into
4.6 Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,367,541 $13,360,266 $0

Close Barton Hills ES and reassign students to Zilker ES and

4.7 close Becker ES and reassgin students to Dawson ES $2,207,301 $11,930,384 $0

Reassign a portion of Linder ES to Travis Heights ES and

4.8 reassign a portion of Travis Heights ES to Becker ES $0 $0 $0
Do not accept transfers into Bryker Woods ES, Casis ES,
5.1 Gullett ES, and Highland Park ES $0 $0 $0
Discontinue the option to offer 6th grade at Bryker
5.2 Woods ES $0 $0 $0
Adjust boundaries between Bryker Woods ES, Gullett ES,
5.3 and Brentwood ES $0 $0 $0
Build new school and adjust boundaries for Highland
5.4 Park ES, Doss ES, and Hill ES $0 $0 $25,200,000

5.5 Adjust boundaries between Mathews ES and Casis ES $0 $0 $0

Adjust boundaries between Norman ES, Overton ES, and
6.1 Ortega ES ($1,220) $0 $0

Add Pre-K center to Winn ES to provide relief for Andrews

6.3 ES, Pecan Springs ES, Jordan ES and Overton ES Unknown $0 $0
Move Kealing MS magnet program to Martin MS. Move
student population of Martin MS into Kealing MS with
7.1 remaining neighborhood students ($186,096) $0 $0
Reassign O. Henry MS/Austin HS students to Martin
7.2 MS/Eastside HS $0 $0 $0
7.3 Reassign Martin MS students to Fulmore MS $0 $0 $0
7.4 Create new K-8 schools at Martin MS and Allan ES $0 $0 $0
Close Webb MS and reassign students into Pearce MS,
8.1 Dobie MS, and Lamar MS $1,865,782 $11,454,070 $0
Close Pearce MS and reassign student population into
Garcia MS, Webb MS and Lamar MS. Reassign a portion
8.2A of Webb MS students to Dobie MS $1,881,140 $7,443,511 $0
Close Pearce MS and reassign student population into
Garcia and Webb MS. Reassign a portion of Webb
students to Dobie. Improve vertical alignment for Webb
8.2B students $1,881,140 $7,443,511 $0
Close ALC and move students to Webb MS. Reassign
Webb MS students to Dobie MS, Lamar MS, and Pearce
8.3 MS $1,567,984 $12,262,155 $0
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Close Webb MS and repurpose school as a School for
8.4 Young Men ($98,844) $0 $0
Reassign a portion of Bedichek MS population to
9.1 Covington MS ($28,677) $0 $0
Adjust boundary between Bedichek MS and Covington
9.2 MS ($234,298) $0 $0

10.1 Adjust boundary between Reagan HS and McCallum HS $0 $0 $0

Improve programming at Reagan HS by providing cross-

training and mentoring with McCallum staff. Provide
nurturing environment to draw students back into
10.2 Reagan HS. $0 $0 $0
Give Reagan HS students the option to attend
specialized signature programs at McCallum HS with
10.3 transportation provided. $0 $0
10.4 Close Eastside HS and consolidate into Reagan HS ($539,373) $0 $0
Close Reagan HS and CAC, repurpose Reagan HS as
10.5 administrative center $0 $0 $0
Close Reagan HS and repurpose as Junior College /
10.6 ACC Partner $0 $0 $0
Identify surplus portables and build new elementary
11.1 school in the next bond $0 $0 $0
Repurpose Langford ES as a Pre-K center and adjust
11.2 boundaries with adjacent schools $0 $0 $0

Close Dobie MS and repurpose as elementary school to

provide relief for Hart ES, Graham ES, Walnut Creek ES
and Barrington ES. Reassign Dobie MS students to Webb
12.1 MS and Pearce MS ($437,477) $0 $0
Discontinue 6th grade at Barrington ES and Walnut
12.2 Creek ES $0 $0 $0
Adjust boundaries between Wooten ES and Brentwood
12.3 ES $0 $0 $0
Assign the remaining 2008 undesignated elementary included in
school to north central Austin (in addition to 2004 Bond 2008 bond
12.4 Program ES) $0 $0 program
Build a new elementary school in north central Austin (in
12.5 addition to 2004 Bond Program ES) $0 $0 $28,100,000

Close Dobie MS and repurpose as an elementary school,

reassign students to Webb MS. Adjust boundaries
between Webb MS and Pearce MS. Move a portion of
student population from Graham ES and Hart ES to new
Dobie Elementary. Adjust boundaries between Graham
ES and Walnut Creek ES and between Hart ES and
12.6 Barrington ES TBD $0 $1,056,778
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact

Repurpose Garcia MS as a 4 - 8 school and reassign a

portion of the population (Sims ES and Norman ES
attendance areas) to Pearce MS. Reassign Overton ES
12.7 and Jordan ES 4 - 5 grade to new Garcia 4 - 8.
Adjust boundaries between Maplewood ES and
13.1 Campbell ES $0 $0 $0

Build new elementary school in Mueller to relieve

13.2 overcrowding at Andrews ES, Harris ES, and Blanton ES ($58,093) $0 $24,000,000

13.3 Adjust boundaries between Andrews ES and Winn ES ($84,811) $0 $0

Build a Pre-K center to relieve Andrews ES, Winn ES,
13.4 Blanton ES, Pecan Springs ES, and Blanton ES $0 $0 $21,600,000
14.1 Build a new school west of Clayton ES $0 $0 $25,200,000
Adjust boundaries between Mills ES, Kiker ES, Cowan ES,
14.2 and Boone ES ($6,120) $0 $0
14.3 Add a K-8th grade school in southwest area Unknown $0

14.4 Adjust boundaries between Clayton ES and Baldwin ES $0 $0 $0

14.5 Repurpose Boone ES as a PK - 8 school $0 $0 $0
Repurpose Casey ES as a Pre-K Center and adjust
boundaries between Williams ES, Menchaca ES, Casey
15.1 ES, Odom ES, and Pleasant Hill ES $0 $0 $0
Build Pre-K center in the Williams ES attendance zone to
relieve Williams ES, Casey ES, Menchaca ES, Odom ES,
15.2 and Pleasant Hill ES $0 $0 $21,600,000
Create a career center and add a magnet program to
16.1 Crockett HS to attract students Unknown

16.2 Adjust boundaries between Akins HS and Crockett HS $0 $0 $0

Adjust boundaries between Murchison MS, Burnet MS,
17.1 Dobie MS, and Webb MS ($191,587) $0 $0

Move middle school population of Lee ES, Campbell ES,

and Maplewood ES attendance zones to Lamar MS.
Create more room at Kealing MS to expand program
17.2 and increase diversity ($73,218) $0 $0
Add a fine arts focus to Lamar MS to attract students and
17.3 increase enrollment Unknown $0 $0
17.4 Close either Pearce MS or Webb MS Unknown $0 $0
Create a sixth grade center with students from Webb MS,
17.5 Pearce MS, Dobie MS, Garcia MS. $0 $0 Unknown
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendix H
Glossary
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Glossary of Terms
Glossary
The following is a list of definitions of known abbreviations
and terms used throughout the District-wide Facility
Master Plan Report.
ADA - Americans with Disabilities Act; addresses
modifications of facilities to ensure access for persons
with disabilities.
Attendance Zone – The geographical area from which
students are assigned a school to attend.
Bond Program – The capital improvement efforts
associated with funding generated from a local voter-
approved tax levy for capital spending.
Building - A structure that houses children or equipment
on a school site or campus.
CAC - Carruth Administration Center; AISD’s
administrative headquarters complex.
CAC – Campus Advisory Council; a campus level
advisory council, required by state law, that addresses
the concerns of school communities.
Campus - A campus is a site where one or more
schools/buildings is/are located. For example, an
elementary school can share a site with a middle school;
therefore, it is considered a campus.
Capital Cost Avoidance – Buying less, or buying nothing
at all, to improve a permanent structure or aspect of a
property.
Capital Improvement - The addition or restoration of a
permanent structure or some aspect of a property that
will either enhance the property’s overall value or
increase its useful life.
Cohort - A specific group of students established for
monitoring purposes, particularly over time.
Core Spaces - Large areas within a building that are
utilized by most students throughout the school day, i.e.,
cafeteria, gymnasium, library.
Deficiency - A construction deficiency is an item or
condition that is considered sub-standard or does not
meet current standards or building codes.
Educational Adequacy - An assessment of a facility to
evaluate how well the campus is equipped to deliver the
instructional program. For example, does the facility
have the standard types of technology within the
classroom that a teacher requires for the current
curriculum? Is there the proper amount of white board
space in the classroom? Is there the correct number of
lab stations in a science room and do they have the
proper equipment?
Educational Specifications - Document that describes
the current standards for program areas, equipment
i
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Glossary of Terms
needs, technology needs, square footage, and special
considerations for a new school.
Enrollment - The number of students attending a school.
Facility Condition Assessment - An evaluation of a school
facility that identifies current building and building system
deficiencies.
FCI - Facility Condition Index; an indicator of a facilities
condition obtained by dividing the repair costs by the
replacement cost of the same building.
FF&E - Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment; the moveable
equipment that is used by the occupants inside a facility.
Generally includes furniture and computers.
Functional Equity - Comparison of identified core areas
and other specialized classroom space and the level at
which they meet the AISD educational specification
standards.
GIS - Geographic Information System; an automated
system for referencing geocoded data, e.g., a database
of addresses for students enrolled in a school system.
HVAC - Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning.
Impervious Cover - Any type of surface that will not allow
rainfall or runoff to soak into the ground (e.g. pavement
or buildings). Local ordinance may limit impervious cover
in developments for environmental protection or runoff
control purposes.
In Migration – Students attending a school that live
outside of that school’s attendance zone.
M&O – Maintenance and Operations; school funding
that pays for day-to-day administrative and operational
costs.
Open Enrollment – A policy or practice that allows
students to attend other AISD outside their assigned
attendance area zone.
Operating Cost - Costs associated with operating a
school facility including administration, custodial and
maintenance supplies and staffing, and food service.
Out Migration - Students leaving their attendance zones
to attend another school in the district.
Permanent Capacity - The number of students a school
can accommodate within its permanent building(s). See
pages 182-183 for additional information.
Portable/Temporary Building - A building designed and
built to be movable rather than as a permanent
structure. A typical portable building in AISD contains
two classrooms.
Priority - A categorization of building deficiencies,
defined as follows.
Priority 1: currently critical (immediate need, i.e., fire
safety systems)
ii
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Glossary of Terms

Priority 2: potentially critical (to be corrected within one SQL - Structured Query Language; a form of database
year, i.e., major HVAC equipment, security systems) that allows the analysis of data by sorting it into
categories.
Priority 3: necessary/not yet critical (1-2 years, i.e., site
lighting, sanitation sewer, educational adequacy) TAS – Texas Accessibility Standards; standards set by the
TDLR (Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation) for
Priority 4: recommended (3-5 years, i.e., finishes,
accessibility to public buildings and facilities, places of
educational adequacy)
public accommodation, and commercial facilities, by
Priority 5: does not meet current code/standards individuals with disabilities.
/grandfathered (i.e., functional equity, 3rd tier ADA)
Teaching Space - A room or designated area where
School Choice - Refers to a policy or practice that allows classes or instruction are held.
parents and students to attend schools outside their
TBD - To be determined.
assigned attendance zones for specific program
offerings or for reasons permitted in the District’s transfer Title 1 - Funding provided by the federal government for
policy. schools with high percentages of students who qualify for
free and reduced lunch. The funding must supplement
School Zone Population - The number of AISD students
existing funding provided by the school district for
living within the attendance zone of a school.
curriculum, instruction, and related services.
Signature Program – A specialized curriculum
Utilization Factor - The enrollment of a school divided by
implemented in a vertical team to enhance the vertical
its permanent capacity, also known as percent of
team’s instructional program.
permanent capacity.
Soft Costs - Generally refers to a collection of costs
Vertical Team - A group of campuses consisting of a high
added to the construction costs and may include items
school and its feeder middle and elementary schools.
like professional fees, construction testing and permitting,
contingencies, or administrative costs.

Site - Geographical location of a school’s building[s].

iii