Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Received 5 December 2001; received in revised form 10 February 2002; accepted 17 February 2002
Abstract
Low-power, ultra-high-vacuum compatible, non-contacting position sensors with nanometer resolution and
centimeter dynamic range have been developed, built and tested. They have been designed at Virgo as the sensors
for low-frequency modal damping of Seismic Attenuation System chains in Gravitational Wave interferometers and
sub-micron absolute mirror positioning. One type of these linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs) has been
designed to be also insensitive to transversal displacement thus allowing 3D movement of the sensor head while still
precisely reading its position along the sensitivity axis. A second LVDT geometry has been designed to measure the
displacement of the vertical seismic attenuation filters from their nominal position. Unlike the commercial LVDTs,
mostly based on magnetic cores, the LVDTs described here exert no force on the measured structure. r 2002 Elsevier
Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Gravitational wave interferometers; Seismic isolation; Viscous modal damping; Position sensors; LVDT
*Corresponding author. LIGO project, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
E-mail address: htariq@ligo.caltech.edu (H. Tariq).
0168-9002/02/$ - see front matter r 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 1 6 8 - 9 0 0 2 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 8 0 2 - 1
H. Tariq et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 489 (2002) 570–576 571
0.2 15
percentage deviation from constant gradient
0 10
-0.2 5
readout (mm)
-0.4 0
-0.6 -5
-0.8 -10
-1 -15
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 (a) -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
displacement (mm)
0.3
Fig. 2. Percentage deviation of the magnetic field gradient
along the sensitive axis of the LVDT.
residuals (mm)
0.2
0.1
-0.1
orthogonal directions. The expected linearity is
confirmed by the calibration of the actual instru- -0.2
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
ments. The emitter coil is moved along the LVDT (b) displacement (mm)
axis with the help of a micrometric positioning
stage. A calibration constant of about 500 mV/mm Fig. 3. Calibration measurement of an IP LVDT (top) and its
residuals from a linear fit (bottom). The error bars (voltmeter
was obtained as shown in Fig. 3 (top), with
resolution) are within the marker size.
o71% deviation from the linearity illustrated in
Fig. 3 (bottom). The very symmetric and almost
sinusoidal residuals point either to geometrical
effects present due to the non-negligible thickness sensitivity of the LVDT to transversal motion is
of the three coils or to the imperfect spacing of the very small, up to a radial distance of 12 mm.
two receiver coils. In principle, the LVDT position resolution is
Alignment errors of the emitting coil with the only limited by the electronics noise. The electro-
receiving coils’ symmetry axis affect the LVDT nics noise is kept low by using a simple phase
sensitivity only to the second order and may locked signal detection technique. The signal sent
introduce some unwanted sensitivity to transversal to the emitter coil is also used to synchronize a low
motions. The insensitivity of the LVDT to the noise, double input linear gate. The amplified
transversal motion is shown in Fig. 4. Only the signal of the receiver coils is sent with opposite
trend of the measured distribution is important. polarity to two alternate gate inputs. For a more
The equations of magnetic field in vacuum require detailed discussion of the electronics see Ref. [19].
smoothness of the LVDT response, which is The actual circuit can be found in Ref. [20].
incompatible with the measured scatter. The In the IP configuration of the LVDTs, described
dispersion of the measurement points is due to a above, a resolution of 20 nm r.m.s. was achieved,
small wobble of the micrometric sled in the as shown in Fig. 5. Further electronics noise
magnetic field gradient direction. The flat trend improvements have led to LVDT resolution twice
of the measurement proves that the actual as good as what is shown in Fig. 5.
574 H. Tariq et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 489 (2002) 570–576
ranges [24].
10
for many other non-contacting position measure- [14] G. Losurdo, Inertial control of the Virgo superattenuators,
ments. Proceedings of 1999 Amaldi Conference, Pasadena, CA.
[15] A. Takamori, et al., Mirror suspension system for the
TAMA-SAS, Proceedings of 2001 Amaldi Meeting, P-
010033-00-D available at http://admdbsrv.ligo.caltech.edu/
References dcc/; Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2002.
[16] M. Beccaria, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 404 (1998)
[1] G. Ballardin, et al., Rev. Sci. Instr. 72 (9) (2001) 3643. 455.
[2] A. Bertolini, et al., New seismic attenuation system (SAS) [17] R. DeSalvo, et al., LIGO-II seismic attenuation system
for the advanced LIGO configurations (LIGO2), Proceed- (SAS), test tower LVDT (linear variable differential
ings of 1999 Amaldi Conference, Pasadena, CA. transducer). mechanical drawings, LIGO drawings, D-
[3] A. Bertolini, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 461 (2001) 010243-00-R available at http://admdbsrv.ligo.caltech.edu/
300. dcc/.
[4] M. Beccaria, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 394 (1997) [18] W. Kester, Practical design techniques for sensor signal
397. conditioning, Analog Devices Inc., 1999.
[5] S. Marka, et al., Anatomy of the TAMA SAS Seismic [19] F. Paoletti, L.V.D.T.: chi era costui? Elettronica, Flash 152
Attenuation System, Proceedings of 2001 Amaldi Meeting, (July/August) (1996) 37–46.
LIGO Report P-010034-00-D available at http://ad- [20] R. DeSalvo, et al., LIGO-II seismic attenuation system
mdbsrv.ligo.caltech.edu/dcc/; Classical and Quantum (SAS) test tower LVDT (linear variable differential
Gravity, 2002. transducer), electronics circuits diagrams, LIGO drawings,
[6] G. Cella, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 487 (2002) 652. D-010248-00-R available at http://admdbsrv.ligo.caltech.
[7] J. Winterflood, et al., Using Buckling Euler Springs for edu/dcc/.
Vibration Isolation, Amaldi, 2001. [21] R. DeSalvo, et al., TOTEM, blade’s creep measuring
[8] G. Losurdo, et al., Rev. Sci. Instr. 70 (1999) 2507. facility, Mechanical drawings LIGO drawings, D-010252-
[9] R. De Salvo, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 420 (1999) 00-R available at http://admdbsrv.ligo.caltech.edu/dcc/.
316. [22] R. DeSalvo, et al., TAMA seismic attenuation system
[10] A. Bertolini, High sensitivity accelerometers for gravity (SAS) tower, Mechanical drawings, LIGO drawings, D-
experiments, Doctoral Thesis, Universit!a di Pisa, June 010249-00-R, in: R. DeSalvo, et al., LIGO-II seismic
2001, LIGO preprint, P-010009-00-Z available at http:// attenuation system (SAS) test tower Filter-0, Mechanical
admdbsrv.ligo.caltech.edu/publications/default.htf?page= drawings, LIGO drawings, D-010241-00-R available at
theses. http://admdbsrv.ligo.caltech.edu/dcc/.
[11] S. Braccini, et al., Rev. Sci. Instr. 66 (3) (1995) 2572. [23] A. Bertolini, et al., The GAS blade creep measurements,
[12] C. Wang, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 489 (2002) problems and some solutions, LIGO Report, T-10112-00-
563. R available at http://admdbsrv.ligo.caltech.edu/dcc/.
[13] G. Losurdo, et al., Rev. Sci. Instr. 72 (9) (2001) 3653. [24] S. Braccini, et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66 (1995) 2672.