Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
When I audited a few companies, I really disliked going through their impairment tests because
all of them seemed nice and always showed no impairment whatsoever.
However, digging deeper into the assumptions and numbers can give different results.
Often I found too unrealistic assumptions, wrong discount rates, incorrect items included in the
cash flow projections, etc.
Here, I would like to shed some light on the cash flow projections that are most judgmental, yet
one of the most important elements in the impairment testing.
1. They are the basis for determining the asset’s or cash generating unit’s (“CGU”) value in
use.
When you are setting the value in use, you are estimating how much value the business
gets out of the asset when using it or consuming it.
2. When there’s not enough market data, cash flow projections are the main input into fair
value calculation.
However the difference from value in use is that in this case, you are estimating cash
flows based on what the market is willing to pay for your asset or CGU under review.
Use reasonable and supportable assumptions as a basis for your cash flow projections.
They must reflect management’s estimate of economic conditions over remaining useful
life of the asset while greater importance is given to external evidence.
Use the most recent financial budgets or forecasts approved by the management, while:
o Exclude future cash flows from restructuring or improving or enhancing asset’s
performance;
o Cover a maximum of 5 years, unless you can justify using longer period.
Then the standard IAS 36 guides you further in preparing your cash flow projections.
I cannot stress it well enough – just use your good, down-to-earth judgment.
Just as an example, imagine you set up a successful start-up and developed a simple gadget with
revolutionary technology and features.
Special For You! Have you already checked out the IFRS Kit ? It’s a full IFRS learning
package with more than 40 hours of private video tutorials, more than 140 IFRS case studies
solved in Excel, more than 180 pages of handouts and many bonuses included. If you take action
today and subscribe to the IFRS Kit, you’ll get it at discount! Click here to check it out!
Your sales have been increasing at the rate of 200% each year for the past 3 years.
You are performing impairment testing of your CGU and in your cash flows you incorporate the
growth rate of 200% for the next 5 years.
You have achieved this rate in the past 3 years, then why not in the future?
Well, if you find out that at the end of year 5 you plan to sell 10 billions of these super computers
based on that growth rate, while total population on earth is just 7 billions – then there’s a
problem, isn’t it?
This was a bit unrealistic illustration, but I think it did its job!
Always bear in mind that your cash flows must be reasonable and supportable.
Thus, you should NOT include neither any outflows to be incurred for improving or enhancing
the asset’s performance, nor any inflows resulting from enhanced asset.
Do NOT recognize improving capital expenditure, but DO recognize replacement and servicing
expenditure to maintain the asset’s capacity.
However, sometimes it is quite difficult and challenging to distinguish between maintenance and
improvement expenses and some judgment is always needed.
There are two exceptions permitting you recognize enhancing capital expenditure in the cash
flow projections:
1. Asset in progress – If you have already invested into generating of some asset, but it has
not been finished, then you should include all expected cash outflows required to make
that asset ready for use or sale (see IAS 36.42).
2. Restructuring – If your company becomes committed to restructuring in accordance with
IAS 37, then you can include the results of that restructuring into cash flow projections.
Just be careful here, because you need to meet certain conditions set by IAS 37 in order
to conclude that you are committed to restructuring.
If you incur foreign currency cash flows related to asset or CGU under testing, then you have a
big complication here.
In fact this is quite common – some company may produce its products in a country with a
functional currency of EUR and most of cash outflows will be in EUR.
The same company may sell all of its products solely to three clients in three different currencies:
USD, GBP and EUR.
How to include forecasted cash inflows in USD and GBP into the cash flow projections in EUR?
1. Estimate cash inflows in the transaction currency and do not translate forecasted
revenues in the functional currency.
In our small illustration, all revenues in USD will be included as cash inflows in USD;
the same applies for GBP.
Here, I’d like to warn you about the inflation rates. When you are estimating cash flows
in foreign currency, be careful about incorporating the growth rate and inflation rate
appropriate for that currency.
I have seen already that some companies forgot about that and applied the same growth
rate to all cash flows irrespective of the currency.
2. Use the appropriate discount rate. You need to realize that the economic environment in
the USA is different from that in Eurozone and as a result, the interest rates and discount
rates are different.
3. Translate present value of foreign currency cash flows to the functional currency
using the spot rate at the date of impairment testing.
This method is prescribed directly in IAS 36.54.
You should NOT use any forward exchange rates, because you would be double counting.
Why?
Well, forward exchange rates are determined based on the differences between the interest rates
of the countries with these currencies.
And, you have already included different interest rates in your calculations by using different
discount rate for the specific currency.
3. Intercompany charges
Another frequent situation is when your company makes intragroup sales or purchases and
needs to include cash flows from these transactions into its projections.
You should always include these transactions at estimated market values, with some adjustments
for discounts or other items (as soon as it reflects the “arm’s length”).
In general, you should NOT include future cash flows related to settlement of receivables,
payables and tax liabilities into the projections.
However, if it is more practical for you, then you can include settlement of these balances into
the cash flows, but in this case you need to be consistent and include the amount of receivables,
payables and tax liabilities into the carrying amount of your CGU under testing.
If you have a liability that has to be considered when determining recoverable amount of CGU,
then you must include the cash outflows related to that liability to cash flow projections.
For example, imagine you are testing a nuclear power plant for the impairment.
Special For You! Have you already checked out the IFRS Kit ? It’s a full IFRS learning
package with more than 40 hours of private video tutorials, more than 140 IFRS case studies
solved in Excel, more than 180 pages of handouts and many bonuses included. If you take action
today and subscribe to the IFRS Kit, you’ll get it at discount! Click here to check it out!
You have to include the decommissioning liability cash outflows into account since this liability
is attached to the nuclear power plant.
In general no, you do not include these if you excluded loan liability from CGU being tested.
You also need to ignore interest payments, because cost of your capital is taken care of by
discounting.
5. Terminal value
If you are testing an asset with an indefinite life, or with a useful life beyond forecasted period,
then you need to include terminal value in the cash flow projections.
It is quite common that the terminal value represents more than 50%, sometimes even 80% of the
total present value of your cash flow projections, therefore it is absolutely crucial to get it as right
as possible.
In many cases, the terminal value is just the net proceeds that you expect to get from the sale of
an asset at the end of its useful life – especially when that end happens to be the end of your cash
flow forecasts.
In other cases, the terminal value is the estimate of what you would get for the cash flows
beyond your forecast period.
Imagine you run an indefinite business, you don’t know when it will terminate generating cash
flows and you are able to make reliable forecasts for the next 5 years.
For how much would you sell that business after 5 years?
1. Exit multiple – this is the multiple of shareholders’ cash flows in the last year of
projections.
2. Perpetuity – you would take the last year’s projection and apply perpetuity formula to it.
The result would be indefinite projection of cash flow in one number.
In fact you are calculating growing perpetuity as a series of periodic payments that grow
at a proportionate rate for an infinite amount of time.
There could be great differences in the terminal value when calculated either way and the reason
is that as you are giving up on business risk when selling a business, your terminal value can be
lower when applying exit multiple.
Thus use the method consistent with the management’s estimate of the company’s destiny at the
time of performing the impairment testing.
The discount rate used to bring the cash flow projections to their present value should be:
a pre-tax rate
reflecting the current market assessments of the time value of money; and
incorporating the asset-specific risks for which the future cash flow estimates have not
been adjusted.
Practically, you can use:
Market interest rate that is incorporated in the current market transactions for similar
assets, or
Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of a listed entity having a single asset or a
portfolio with similar service potential and risks to the asset under review, or
Surrogates, such as:
o Your own WACC;
o Your own incremental borrowing rate; or
o Other market borrowing rates.
Having that said, you need to be careful enough to incorporate all the necessary risks that were
not incorporated into your cash flows and vice versa.
You cannot incorporate the same risk to both discount rates and cash flows, otherwise it would
be double counting.
You need to use pre-tax rate, while sometimes the rates are set post-tax. In this case, here’s the
article on how to calculate pre-tax rate from post-tax rate.
Finally, remember that some cash flows might require using different discount rate.
For example, when you have cash flows denominated in a foreign currency, or cash flows with
different risks.
It would be appropriate to use WACC for low-risk assets like buildings, but if you test riskier
assets like brands, or start-ups, then you might need to adjust discount rate for higher risk.
Well, if you are an auditor, you should be aware of human psychology, too.
Sometimes, business people tend to be over-optimistic and thus management often includes too
optimistic views of their future performance into cash flow projections.
Unless the management is a great prophet who proved to forecast the numbers with 90%
reliability in the past, this approach is a bit risky and not really substantive.
Did you look to your forecasts 3 years ago and compare them to the present results? How precise
were you?
Special For You! Have you already checked out the IFRS Kit ? It’s a full IFRS learning
package with more than 40 hours of private video tutorials, more than 140 IFRS case studies
solved in Excel, more than 180 pages of handouts and many bonuses included. If you take action
today and subscribe to the IFRS Kit, you’ll get it at discount! Click here to check it out!
Of course, no one wants management to be a fortune-teller and having a crystal ball standing on
their desk, but if the management was not so precise in their forecasts, maybe it is time to include
more than one scenario of cash flow projections.
You may prepare one cash flow projection for the great times, one for the miserable times and
one if the things go as expected.
Then you need to weight these cash flows by probabilities of happening and calculate expected
cash flows.
Alternatively, you can use the traditional approach and incorporate the risks and uncertainties to
your discount rate – which I find more difficult.
Final word
I planned to include the numerical example in this article, but when I thought about it, I decided
not to.
The reason is that there are so many calculations and illustrations to show you and thus I decided
to do the separate article with the example illustrating the calculations.
Stay tuned and please leave a comment below if you wish. Thank you!
Tags In
IAS 36
Recent Comments
Categories