4. PRECONDIŢII
4.1 De curriculum Analiza statistica; Sociologie generala, WORD, EXCEL, POWER POINT, OneDrive (MS Office)
5. CONDIŢII
5.1 De desfăşurare a cursului Acces la Internet şi staţie de lucru (desktop, laptop, tabletă)
5.2 De desfăşurare a seminarului Acces la Internet şi staţie de lucru (desktop, laptop, tabletă)
6 .COMPETENŢE SPECIFICE ACUMULATE
6.1 Competenţe profesionale Analiza si evaluarea sistemelor de vot. Informarea si suportul deciziei de vot
6.2 Competenţe transversale Elaborarea si/sau adaptarea dinamica a sistemelor de vot in Europa Centrala si de Est
7. OBIECTIVELE DISCIPLINEI
7.1 Obiectivul general al disciplinei Aplicarea conceptelor si metodelor de modelare statistica si analiza politica de tip
evaluativ-cantitativ in modelarea alegerii sociale si sistemelor de vot.
7.2 Obiective specifice Sunt analizate procesele de tranzitie spre democratie si de consolidare a democratiei in
regimurile post-comuniste din Europa de Est prin prisma sistemelor de vot.
8. CONŢINUTURI
8.1. Curs Metode de predare Observaţii
Săptămâna 6
Tema curs & seminar: Modele de vot strategic
Lecturi recomandate:
- Cox, G. W. (1997) Making Votes Count : Strategic
Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Cox, Gary W. 1994. “Strategic Voting Equilibria
under the Single Non-Transferable Vote.” American
Political Science Review 88: 608-621.
- Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of
Democracy, New York, Harper and Row.
- Duverger, M. (1951) Les partis politiques, Paris,
Armand Colin.
- Galbraith, John W. and Nicole C. Rae. 1989. “A Test
of the Importance of Tactical Voting: Great Britain,
1987.” British Journal of Political Science 19: 126-
136.
- Riker, W. H. (1982) “Liberalism Against Populism: A
confrontation between the theory of democracy
and the theory of social choice”, San Francisco, W.H.
Freeman.
Săptămâna 7
Tema curs & seminar: Modelul coalitiei politice.
Lecturi recomandate:
- Riker, William H. and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1968. “A
Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political
Science Review 62: 24-42.
- Riker,W.H. (1962). The theory of political coalitions,
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Săptămâna 8
Tema curs & seminar: Teoria lui Condorcet asupra deciziilor
in jurii/comisii
Lecturi recomandate:
- Austen-Smith, D. and Banks, J. S.: 1996, Information
aggregation, rationality and the Condorcet jury
theorem, American Political Science Review 90, 34–
45.
- Condorcet, Marquis de. 1785. “Essai sur l’application
de l’analyse a la probabilite des decisions rendues a
la pluralite des voix”. Paris: L’Imprimerie Royale.
- R.B. Myerson, “Extended Poisson Games and the
Condorcet Jury Theorem” Games and Economic
Behavior 25 (1998) 111-131.
- C. Martinelli, “Would Rational Voters Acquire Costly
Information?” Journal of Economic Theory 129
(2006) 225-251
Săptămâna 9
Tema curs & seminar: Agregarea informatiei in campaniile
electorale. Social media, fenomenul de „fake news“ si
democratia.
Lecturi recomandate:
- Battaglini, Marco, Rebecca B. Morton, and Thomas
R. Palfrey. 2008. "Information Aggregation and
Strategic Abstention in Large Laboratory Elections"
American Economic Review, 98(2): 194-200.
- Sekiguchi - Elections and Markets as Information
Aggregation Mechanisms in a Large Society
- Timothy Feddersen and Wolfgang, Voting Behavior
and Information Aggregation in Elections With
Private Information, Econometrica, Vol. 65, No. 5
(Sep., 1997), pp. 1029-1058.
- Feddersen, T. and Pesendorfer, W.: 1997, Voting
behavior and information aggregation in elections
with private information, Econometrica 65, 1029–
1058.
- C. Martinelli, “Rational Ignorance and Voting
Behavior” International Journal of Game Theory 35
(2007) 315-335
- Price, V., Zaller, J. 1993. “Who Gets the News?
Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their
Implications for Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly
57(2): 133–64.
- Hunt, A., Gentzkow, M. 2017. Social Media and Fake
News in the 2016 Election, Journal of Economic
Perspectives, Vol.31, No.2, pp.211-236.
- Kaplan, Richard L. 2002. Politics and the American
Press: The Rise of Objectivity, 1865–1920.
Cambridge University Press.
- Lelkes, Y. 2016. Mass Polarization: Manifestations
and Measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1):
392–410.
Săptămâna 10
Tema curs & seminar: Modele ale increderii si legitimitatii
politice in regimurile post-comuniste din Europa de Est.
Lecturi recomandate:
- Cohen, Joshua. 1989. Deliberation and Democratic
Legitimacy. 17-34 in Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit,
eds., The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the
State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Dryzek, John S. and Christian List. 2000. Social
Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A
Reconciliation.
- Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms:
Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and
Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Levitsky, S. & Way, L. (2002). The Rise of
Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of
Democracy, 13, 51-65.
- Mishler W., Rose R. 2001. What are the origins of
political trust?: Testing institutional and cultural
theories in post-communist societies, Comparative
Political Studies, 34 (1), pp. 30-62.
- Offe C. 1999. How Can We Trust Our Fellow
citizens?, Published in: Warren, Mark E. (ed.),
Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, pp. 42-87.
- Pehlivanova P. 2009. The Decline of Trust in Post-
communist Societies, CEU Political Science Research
Centre, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 32-47
- Sztompka. Trust, Distrust and Democracy.
- Tilly Ch. 1995. To Explain Political Processes,
American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 100, No.6, pp.
1594-1610.
- Karklins R. 2005. The System Made Me Do It:
Corruption in Post-Communist Societies, M.E.
Sharpe Inc. NY.
- Voinea C.F., B. Todosijevic, G. Boella (Eds.). 2013.
“Political Attitudes and Mentalities. Eastern
European Political Cultures: Modeling Studies”, Ars
Docendi-Bucharest University Press. ISBN 978-973-
558-719-2.
9. SCURTĂ DESCRIERE*
* COROBORAREA CONŢINUTURILOR DISCIPLINEI CU AŞTEPTĂRILE REPREZENTANŢILOR COMUNITĂŢII EPISTEMICE, ASOCIAŢIILOR PROFESIONALE ŞI ANGAJATORI
REPREZENTATIVI DIN DOMENIUL AFERENT PROGRAMULUI
Curs avansat in analiza politica de tip evaluativ-cantitativ si metode de modelare a proceselor politice. Sunt prezentate modele si
teorii ale alegerii sociale. Sunt analizate modele teoretice de referinta cu privire la fenomene politice: comportamentul la vot,
informarea alegatorilor in campaniile electorale, votul strategic, coruptia, lobby, institutiile si puterea in democratii reprezentative.
Sunt prezentate si analizate modele de vot (definitie, tipologie, efecte politice si sociale). Sunt analizate procesele de tranzitie spre
democratie si de consolidare a democratiei in regimurile post-comuniste din Europa de Est prin prisma sistemelor de vot.
10. EVALUARE
Tip activitate 10.1 Criterii de evaluare 10.2 Metode de evaluare 10.3 Pondere din nota finală
Tip activitate Lecturile recomandate si Discutii interactive Ponderea notei pentru
Activitate de participare personale (intrebari/raspunsuri) participare la discutii si
interactiva la curs si seminar Lucrarile aplicative Exercitii interactive de prezentarea notiunilor teoretice
Activitate de participare individuale identificare a situatiilor tipice la curs (C): 30%
interactiva la exercitii si Capacitate de sinteza si de studiu, colectare date Ponderea notei pentru
exemple aplicative analiza empirice, analiza statistica activitatea de participare
Activitate de studiu individual Capacitate de utilizare a Exemple rezolvate (modele) interactiva la exercitii si exemple
pentru elaborarea eseului modelelor de curs in lucrarile Exemple rezolvate interactiv aplicative (S): 40%
individual. individuale Ponderea notei pentru
Elaborarea eseului individual: elaborarea eseului individual
se recomanda studentilor (E):360%
urmatorii pasi:
1-sa aleaga un model dintre
cele prezentate in cadrul
temelor de curs si seminar,
2-sa identifice referintele
principale in literatura
recomandata si
3-sa explice conceptele de
baza si utilitatea modelului in
analiza atitudinilor politice.
Structura eseului:
1. Modelul ales, titlul
eseului, tabela de
cuprins
2. Intrducere
3. Capitole (1,2)
4. Concluzii
Bibliografie
10.4 Curs
v. 10, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3
10.5 Seminar
v. 10, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3