Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Evaluation Rubric

    Încărcat de

    natalie_cisneros
    67 vizualizări2 pagini
    Evaluation Rubric A Paper Thesis Easily identifiable, plausible, novel, sophisticated, insightful, crystal clear. All ideas in the paper flow logically; the argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound. B paper Promising, but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. C Paper May be unclear (contain many vague terms), appear unoriginal, or offer relatively little that is new.

    Descriere originală:

    Drepturi de autor

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formate disponibile

    PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    Evaluation Rubric A Paper Thesis Easily identifiable, plausible, novel, sophisticated, insightful, crystal clear. All ideas in the paper flow logically; the argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound. B paper Promising, but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. C Paper May be unclear (contain many vague terms), appear unoriginal, or offer relatively little that is new.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    67 vizualizări2 pagini

    Evaluation Rubric

    Încărcat de

    natalie_cisneros
    Evaluation Rubric A Paper Thesis Easily identifiable, plausible, novel, sophisticated, insightful, crystal clear. All ideas in the paper flow logically; the argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound. B paper Promising, but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. C Paper May be unclear (contain many vague terms), appear unoriginal, or offer relatively little that is new.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 2

    Philosophy 100w.

    07 Natalie Cisneros

    Evaluation Rubric
    A Paper B Paper C Paper D Paper
    Thesis Easily identifiable, plausible, Promising, but may be May be unclear (contain many vague Difficult to identify at all,
    novel, sophisticated, slightly unclear, or lacking terms), appear unoriginal, or offer may be bland
    insightful, crystal clear. in insight or originality. relatively little that is new. restatement of obvious
    point.

    Organization Evident, understandable, Generally clear and Generally unclear, often wanders or Unclear, often because
    appropriate for thesis. appropriate, though may jumps around. Few or weak thesis is weak or non-
    Excellent transitions from wander occasionally. May transitions, many paragraphs without existent. Transitions
    point to point. have a few unclear topic sentences. confusing and unclear.
    transitions.

    Textual Primary source information Examples used to support Examples used to support some Very few or very weak
    used to buttress every point most points. Some evidence points. Points often lack supporting examples. General
    Support with at least one example. does not support point, or evidence, or evidence used where failure to support
    Examples support thesis and may appear where inappropriate (often because there statements.
    fit within paragraph. inappropriate. may be no clear point).

    Understanding Demonstrates an in depth Demonstrates a solid Demonstrates a general Demonstrates a little


    understanding of the ideas in understanding of the ideas understanding of the ideas in the understanding of and/or
    the assigned reading and in the assigned reading and assigned reading and only misreads the assigned
    critically evaluates/responds critically evaluates/ occasionally critically evaluates/ reading.
    to those ideas in an responds to those ideas in responds to those ideas in an
    analytical, persuasive an analytical, persuasive analytical, persuasive manner.
    manner. manner.

    Reasoning All ideas in the paper flow Argument of paper is clear, Logic may often fail, or argument Ideas do not flow at all,
    logically; the argument is usually flows logically and may often be unclear. May not usually because there is
    identifiable, reasonable, and makes sense. Some address counter-arguments or make no argument to support.
    sound. Author anticipates evidence that counter- any outside connections. Simplistic view of topic;
    and successfully defuses arguments acknowledged, no effort to grasp
    counter-arguments. though perhaps not possible alternative
    addressed. views.

    Clarity and Writing is clear; sentence Writing is clear; sentence Writing is somewhat clear; problems Writing unclear; big
    structure and grammar structure, grammar, and in sentence structure, grammar, and problems in sentence
    Mechanics excellent. diction strong despite diction (usually not major). structure, grammar, and
    occasional lapses. diction.
    Philosophy 100w.07 Natalie Cisneros

    Evaluation Rubric

    S-ar putea să vă placă și