Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
William Witt
14 Feb 2011
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. 1
Prezi
I spent about an hour working with the web based presentations tools on the Prezi website. The
application was complex enough to provide a rich experience, and simple enough to thouroughly
explore in that 6o minutes. Working with Prezi was an interesting experience at first. I found the
interface to be intuitive and easy to use. As a Linux user I appreciated the fact the site was compatible
with my system, and did not use crude user agent string checks to guess that my system might not be
compatible like some sites even though it is(e.g. turbotax.com). The look an feel of the presentations
created by Prezi were refreshingly dynamic. The fact that the presentations are available online with
Prezi ended.
In my opinion most significant problem with Prezi is that once you create your presentation on
Prezi you are unable to to another service. This limitation is shared with most “web 2.0” applications,
and social networking sites. The second issue I have with Prezi is its need to be online inorder to fully
function. Because all video must be on youtube, all presentations with video must be done online with
a fast an reliable internet connection, this is a nonstarter for most business presentations that are given
away from home office. Additionally, Prezi utilizes and executable file instead instead of browser
rendered file to launch the offline presentation mode, again this a nonstarter in a government/corporate
environments where every application that is executed on the machine must be authorized. My third
criticism is that is is written in Adobe Flash, a closed technology that is is prone to crashing and
overusing system resources and has been plagued by security concerns in recent years. Finally, Prezi
is not open source software, as a result I find it more beneficial to funnel my time and energy into a
http://prezi.com/wio4dpwkdlmf/computer-science/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. 2
Scribd
My first experience with Scribd.com was a little unnerving. When I entered the site I was
authentication cookie from another site as positive identification for a user. Either Scribd.com needs to
reevaluate their security posture, or Face Book needs to evaluate their privacy policy for allowing some
other site to authenticate against their systems using only a cookie . It is more likely the latter than the
former, so I will choose to blame Face Book to allowing the indiscretion. Overall, I can see a niche
market for Scribd where individuals can provide a marketplace of freely searched manuscript length
documents. This niche would not be filled by blogging software due to the formatting and
immutability requirements in tings like white papers, scientific papers, and books. Additionally, unlike
many other online applications Scribd has a fast and reliable method for retrieval of documents posted,
either as text or PDF. Unfortunately, this advantage is only of marginal benefit because you must use
Overall the I was not impressed with Scridb's ability to handle uploaded documents. I
attempted to upload MS Word, Acrobat, and Open Document formatted files all of which failed. In an
effort to have a link to provide for this assignment, I uploaded a plain text and rich text document both
of which succeeded. In contrast, Google Docs allowed all five formats with only minor formatting
differences. Herein lies the problem this the niche Scribd occupies, Google could replace scribd with a
couple extra settings in Google Docs and a targeted search, similar to Google Books. I personally
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49608567/ITM434-Module-1-CS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. 3
Posterous
Posterous is a site I wanted to like, but I can't. It's a web front end on a micro-blogging client,
and these have been done and redone in standalone form for the last 5+ years that twitter and identi.ca
have been on the scene. The single most unsatisfactory aspect of Posterous is the default method, and
their gimmick, is the ability to post via email using an easily discoverable incoming address while only
authenticating against the “from” line in your email. Posterous markets themselves as gateway to
Twitter and Face Book, but I wouldn't trust login credentials to a company that honestly trusts email
headers as an authentication source. To contrast, Face Book has a similar feature, but uses a randomly
generated email address instead of the user's username. Face Book's feature is not is not impervious to
targeted attack, but takes substantially more skill than Posterous. The bottom line for me and
Posterous is that I will be closing my account immediately following grading of this assignment, I feel
http://unamanic.posterous.com/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. 4