Sunteți pe pagina 1din 7

Galley Proof 29/04/2003; 14:33 File: bmr79.tex; BOKCTP/wyy p.

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 16 (2002) 1–7 BMR79 1


IOS Press

Injuries in artistic gymnastic elite adolescents


male and female athletes
P. Kirialanis, P. Malliou∗ , A. Beneka, V. Gourgoulis, A. Giofstidou and G. Godolias
Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Komotini, Greece

Abstract: Objectives: The purpose of this study was to record the incidence of Sport Injuries (acute and overuse syndromes) in
Greek artistic gymnasts in relation to sex, age, event and exercise phase.
Methods: 187 Greek elite artistic gymnastic athletes (100 male and 87 female athletes) participating in Greek artistic gymnastic
championship involving all age-related categories, were observed on a weekly basis for a year. The athletes consisted of the
pre-national team that was chosen to prepare for the next Olympic games.
Results: 147 (61.5%)acute injuries and 93 (38.5%) overuse syndromes were recorded. The most common anatomical location of
injury was the ankle (110 cases, 46%), followed by the knee (63 cases, 26.2%). According to the results, the rate which involved
mild injuries was 26.8% (64 cases, 34 males, 30 females) moderate injuries was 44% (106 cases, 59 males, 48 females), major
injuries was 29% (70 cases, 38 males, 31 females). For the total sport injuries recorded, the injury incid on the “floor” and
especially during “landing phase”, were statistically significant.
Conclusions: Artistic gymnastics predisposes to acute injuries, by its nature, but up to 70% are mild and moderate. Special
attention needs to be given during “floor exercises”, especially on landing phase.

Keywords: Artistic gymnastics, muscular and skeletal injuries

1. Introduction Since the mid 1970s, competitive gymnastics has


undergone a dramatic transformation with respect to
The sport of gymnastics began with the ancient the complexity of manoeuvres performed and the age
Greeks and Egyptians, where it was used as a means at which gymnasts start training [25]. Both coaches
of discipline and physical conditioning for young men and gymnasts have become more ambitious and cre-
being trained for warfare [38]. Today, it is both a recre- ative, and consequently, the range and number of risk
ational and organized sporting activity, in which there
elements incorporated into gymnastics routines. More
are six major disciplines: men’s artistic gymnastics,
children are starting gymnastics from an earlier age
women’s artistic gymnastics, rhythmic sportive gym-
and maintaining an extremely high level of training
nastics, sport aerobics, trampoline sports, and general
gymnastics [6]. Within each of these disciplines, there throughout the years of growth and development. Con-
are three main levels of gymnastics activity: recre- sequently, it has been suggested that the increased in-
ational, competitive, and elite [6]. volvement and difficulty of skills practiced from an
Epidemiological studies relating to injuries different early age may be associated with an increased risk of
information that are gathered from athletes teams, are injury [24]. Most elite gymnasts do not pass through
used to define which are the factors that predispose the childhood and adolescence without injury, and the risk
athletes to the appearance of the injuries [13,33]. of injury increases with longer practice time and the
degree of difficulty of the routines [36].
There is a general admission referring to the risk
∗ Address for correspondence: Malliou Paraskevi, Assistant Pro-
factors for injuries according to they can be classified
fessor, Democritus University of Thrace, Dept. Physical Education
and Sport Science, 69100 Komotini – Greece. Tel.: +30 5310 39662; into two categories: Internal (personal) and external
Fax: +30 5310 39623, E-mail: malliou2002@yahoo.gr. (environment) ones [37].

ISSN 1053-8127/02/$8.00  2002 – IOS Press. All rights reserved


Galley Proof 29/04/2003; 14:33 File: bmr79.tex; BOKCTP/wyy p. 2

2 P. Kirialanis et al. / Injuries in artistic gymnastic elite adolescents male and female athletes

The internal (personal) factors are characteristics of searchers [1,5]. According Maffuli et al. [19], the effect
the athlete, some of which are impossible to change, of the sex factor is related to the increase of the prob-
the age, for instance, and the sex. Some, of the internal ability of injury appearance during artistic gymnastics,
factors though, are characteristics that can be changed, since women are more often injured [3,22].
like the strength of the lower limbs, the flexibility of Concerning the recovering period after injury Petrone
the thighs, the balance skillfulness and other natural or and Ricciardelli [27] found that for 71% of the cases the
moving skills. recovering time was less than 3 weeks, for 29% more
The external factors that can affect the injuries are the than 3 weeks and for 16% it was more than 6 weeks,
characteristics of the environment in which the athlete staing that in their majority they were mild injuries. On
acts, like the type of the sport, the weather conditions, the contrary, according to Bak et al. [1], 55% of the
the way in which the sport is practiced and other factors. injuries recovered in a time period of less than 30 days
Especially, for the artistic gymnastics, some of the ex- and 45% after 6 months.
ternal factors, which possibly affect the injuries, are the The different competitive events, which last from
instruments, the exercises they perform, the hours of only a few seconds (the vault) to about 90 seconds (the
training, the apparatus and the training plan in general. floor routine), require a combination of speed, strength,
According to Dzioba [9] there are two great cate- endurance, agility, flexibility, and power. Previous re-
gories of athletic injuries. Those, which are a direct re- search has estimated that gymnasts obtain up to 80–
sult of a wounding incident and those which, are caused 90% of their energy needs from anaerobic sources, with
because of overuse (overuse syndromes). Overuse syn- minimal energy from aerobic pathways [6].
dromes occur as a result of training methods rather than Most of the injuries that happen to artistic gymnas-
tic happen on the “floor” [5,11,21]. Caine et al. [5]
participation in competition events (acute injuries) [30].
found out that for female athletes 35.4% of the injuries
Chronic problems (overuse syndromes) are often more
happen on the floor, 23.1% on balance beam, 20% on
difficult to handle than acute pathology, which puts the
asymmetric bars and the 13.8% on the pommel horse.
physicians and therapist at a disadvantage and is a key
According to Linder and Caine 17, 40% of the injuries
factor usually overlooked by the coach and athlete [30].
also happen on the floor. Bale and Goodway [2], men-
Having listed the lower limb injuries in the Athletic
tioned that most of the injuries in women happen on the
Center of Northern Greece, it was announced that dur- floor, followed by injuries on asymmetric bars, balance
ing the years 1988–1998, the over-use injuries were beam and vault. On the contrary, Weiker [38] supports
54.2%, of the total referred injuries in Greek track and that most injuries happen on beam.
field and gymnastics athlete [18]. More important with regard to injury risk is the fact
The typical approach to training consists of the fol- that both the upper and lower extremities of gymnasts
lowing phases: preparatory phase (general and spe- are subjected to frequent, high impact, weight-bearing
cific), precompetitive period and competitive period [6, activities.
34]. Petrone and Ricciardelli [27] divided the train- Despite the comparatively large number of re-
ing in three different periods. These are the prepara- searchers for the injuries during artistic gymnastic there
tory period (preparatory and precompetitive phases), is a gap concerning the importance of influence of the
the competitive period and the transitional period. Ac- factors that affect the appearance of the injuries. In
cording to them [27] 80% of the injuries happen dur- Greece, moreover, there is a total lack of research data.
ing the preparation period (pre season), 28.1% during The aim of the present study was the registration of
the contending period (season) and 14.05% during the the injuries and the influence of, mainly, the exter-
transitional period (post-season). It is not uncommon nal factors on the appearance of the injuries of artistic
for elite gymnasts to start training from as early as five gymnasts in Greece. The knowledge and evaluation of
or six years of age, and to train for between 20 to 40 these factors will help discover the most ideal solutions
hours a week all year round [6]. This is the reason that for restriction and avoidance of athletic injuries during
most of the injuries happen during the training. artistic gymnastics.
Artistic gymnastics is among the sports with par-
ticular high injury percentages [13,14,37] and most of
2. Materials and method
them are also found in the lower limbs. According to
McAuley et al. [21], the majority of the injuries (47– 2.1. Study population
58%) have to do with joint ruptures and sprains [4].
The opinion that female athletes have more possibil- One hundred and eighty-seven(187) Greek elite artis-
ity of getting injured is supported by most of the re- tic gymnastic athletes (100 male and 87 female athletes)
Galley Proof 29/04/2003; 14:33 File: bmr79.tex; BOKCTP/wyy p. 3

P. Kirialanis et al. / Injuries in artistic gymnastic elite adolescents male and female athletes 3

participating in Greek artistic gymnastic championship was of 1.3 per gymnast per year. In terms of gymnastic
involving all age-related categories were observed on a participation over 12 month the 187 gymnasts reported
weekly basis for the 2000–2001 season. The 187 ath- 1.4 injuries per 1000 hours of training.
letes consisted of the pre-national team that is chosen Using X 2 analysis there proved to be no difference
by a Special National Committee to be prepared for the in injury rate based on the sex of the athletes (p =
next Olympic games. The characteristics of the sample 0.770). The injury rate during training sessions was
are presented in Table 1. statistically related in comparison to game injury rate
(X 2 = 49.273, p < 0.05) but there were no differences
2.2. Data collection and definition of injury in relation to sex (Table 2).
One-way ANOVA revealed that the injured athletes
An orthopaedic surgeon, a physiotherapist and a had statistical significant higher duration training time
trainer composed the “injury assessment” team. Au- (training session time and for total weekly training
thors twice a week registered any injury occurred dur- time) in comparison with the uninjured athletes (Ta-
ing scheduled games or practices which made the ath- ble 3)
lete miss the next game or practice session [7]. The It is notable that, according to records, 62% of the
date, diagnosis, mechanism, whether occurred during total athletes were injured: 78.9% were injured athletes
practice or game, total time (in days) lost of partici- was injured once, 14.1% were injured twice, 7% three
pation, the characteristics, the anatomical location, the times and 1% four time.
event, the exercise and exercise phase of the muscle-
skeletal injuries occurred were recorded. 3.2. Time of season
The doctor or physiotherapist who attended the prac-
tices and the games recorded all the injuries. Injury Subdividing the year into three periods (preseason-
was defined as “any mishap occurring during sched- season-postseason) allowed assessing the role that each
uled games or practices that made an athlete miss a period might have to injury occurrence. The injury rate
subsequent game or practice session [4]. Injuries were for the athletes (males and females) into three period
classified into three grades of severity: minor (absence of year (preseason, season and post season) was 74.5%
from training or games for less than 1 week), mod- for the preseason, 13.3% for the season and 6.2% for
erate (absence from training or games for 1 week to the post season.
1 month), major (absence from training or games for The injury rate in preseason period was statistically
more than 1 month). Lots of other research adapted the different in comparison to season and postseason injury
same classification [7,10,26,29]. rate for the total athletes (p = 0.000 < 0.05).
To investigate the role that age may have played
in injury rates and severity, we divided the athletes 3.3. Type of injury and anatomic location
into four age-related categories, according to Greek
Artistic Gymnastic Federation Rules. According to the The total sample (n = 187) reported 240 injuries
Greek Federation, those under 10 years old consisted (missing value =8) for the 12 month experimental pe-
the A category, those 11 to 13 years old consisted the riod. One hundred and forty-seven(147) (61.5%) were
B category, those 14 to 16 years old consisted the C acute injuries and 93 (38.5%) overuse syndromes. Ta-
category and those older than 17 years old consisted ble 4 shows that, for the total sample, injuries were
the D category. distributed throughout the body. The most common
The data were statistically analysed using a X 2 anal- anatomic location of injury for the athletes was ankle
ysis of SPSS statistical package to determine whether (46%), followed by knee (26.2%), wrist (9.2%), lower
any of the previously mentioned factors had a relation back (7.5%) elbow (6.2%) and shoulder (5%).
to the incidence of injury. A p level less than 0.05
denoted statistical significance. 3.4. Sexes and injury rate

According to X 2 analysis there were statistically dif-


3. Results ferent injury rate between injured and uninjured ath-
letes (p < 0.05) but there was no any relation in terms
3.1. Injury rate of sex (p = 0.736) (Table 3).
There was a different injury rate for the upper limbs
During the period of the study (12 months) the total between male and female athletes but it was not statis-
sample (n = 187) reported 248 injuries. An injury rate tically different (p = 0.091 > 0.05).
Galley Proof 29/04/2003; 14:33 File: bmr79.tex; BOKCTP/wyy p. 4

4 P. Kirialanis et al. / Injuries in artistic gymnastic elite adolescents male and female athletes

Table 1
Age and the anthropometrical characteristics
Athletes Male (n = 100) Female (n = 87)
characteristics Mean (±SD) Mean (±SD)
Age (years) 13 (±3.2) 11,5 (±2.3)
Weight (Kg) 38.8 (±12.8) 32.4 (±9.6)
Height (cm) 144.8 (±17) 138.2 (±13.1)

Table 2
The injury rate for the athletes (males and females), in the three periods of the year and d
No cases Injury rate % Injuries in training (cases) Injuries in games (cases) Other(cases)
Athletes (187) 248 132.6 176* 52 12
Male (100) 139 139 94 35 10
Female (87) 109 125.2 80 27 2
∗ Statistically significant.

Table 3
The training session time and total weekly training time for injured and non-injured male and female athletes
Total cases Male cases (%) Female cases (%) Training session duration (h) Total training time weekly (h)
MD (±SD) MD (±SD)
Injured* 116 63 (63%) 53 (61%) 4.1 *(±1.02) 26.61 (±3.81)
Non-injured 71 37 (37%) 34 (39%) 3.42 (±0.84) 20.79 (±3.87)
∗F ∗F
1.184 = 25.173, 1.183 = 28.18
2
∗ Statistically significant.

3.5. Severity of injury 4. Discussion

According to the results, the rate which involved mild The artistic gymnastics injury rate is high. This find-
injuries was 26.8% (64 cases, 34 males, 30 females), ing is alarming and should be considered by coaches
moderate injuries was 44% (106 cases, 59 males, 48 and sport medicine personnel in terms of developing
females), major injuries was 29% (70 cases, 38 males, and implementing injury prevention programs directed
31 females) (missing value=8). No statistical differ- at gymnastics participants.
The injury rate for the male athletes was 139% and
ences between severities of injury in relation to sex
for the female athletes was 125% during a certain pe-
(p = 0.670) were observed.
riod, which is much greater than in most of the studies.
Moreover, other researchers as well, justify the differ-
3.6. Age-related category ence as for the injury incidence due to the age-level and
time duration of the training session [1].
To analyse the role that age may play in injury out- The different injury incidence rate could be due to
comes, we assigned the athletes to one of the four age– the fact that this study differed from the others in sev-
related categories. Using X 2 analysis there proved to eral bases. Firstly, the higher rate in comparison with
be no difference in injury rate based on the athlete’s the researches, which reveal lower injury rates [11,12]
age in relation to sex (p = 0.422). could be due to different competitive level of the sam-
ples (elite in current research). On the contrary, the
lower injury rate that previous studies revealed in com-
3.7. The event parison with the studies that had higher injury rates [5,
11] could be due to lower training time duration weekly.
According to one-way ANOVA results the “floor” is The training period of the artistic gymnast who took
the equipment on which most of the athletes of artistic part in the research was great enough, since the average
gymnastic are injured, with statistical differences, than training time of a training unit is almost 4 hours and
other equipment for males (F = 5.425, p < 0.05) the hours of training during the week are more than 24
and for females (F = 3.406, p < 0.05) (Table 5) and hours. Most researchers reported that the duration time
especially on landing phase. of the training in a week was 20 hours [5,31,32]. Kirby
Galley Proof 29/04/2003; 14:33 File: bmr79.tex; BOKCTP/wyy p. 5

P. Kirialanis et al. / Injuries in artistic gymnastic elite adolescents male and female athletes 5

Table 4
Acute and chronic injuries in terms of anatomical location
Anatomical location Acute injury cases (%) Overuse syndrome cases (%) Total injury cases (%)
Total 147 (61.5%) 93 (38.5%) 240 (100%)
Ankle-foot 76* (51.8%) 34* (36.3%) 110* (46%)
Knee-thigh 36 (24.7%) 27 (29.3%) 63* (26.2%)
Wrist-hand 19 (12.9%) 3 (3.4%) 22 (9.1%)
Elbow-forearm 8 (5.3%) 7 (6.8%) 15 (6.2%)
Shoulder 5 (3.2%) 7 (6.8%) 12 (5%)
Lower back 3 (2.1%) 15 (17.4%) 18 (7.5%)
∗ Statistically significant.

Table 5
Number of cases of injured male and female athletes in relation to event and
exercise phase
Event Landing * Take off Tumbling
Male Female Male Female Male Female
Floor * 64 39 – 10 9 3
Beam X 10 X 10 X 3
Asymmetric bars X 10 X – X –
Vault 6 14 – – – –
Bars, horizontal 9 X 6 X 3 X
Bars, parallel 34 X – X – X
Others 3 4 – 2 3 4
∗ Statistically significant.

and Kolt 16 referred higher duration time of training al. [28]. Kolt and Kirkby [15] in contrast supported that
in week base and Bernard et al. [4] reported that the the knee possesses the greater incidence of injuries.
artists gymnasts of higher level are trained for almost The ascertainment that there are no important dif-
27.5 hours a week. ferences for the incidence of the injuries and the sex,
In the present study, the time of weekly training comes in contrast to most of the findings of the interna-
between the injured and non- injured athletes is was tional bibliography, where it is supported that women
ascertained that the injured athletes are being trained have more possibilities to present injuries [1,19]. From
for more hours a week than the non injured ones. It the results of the present study it was ascertained that
also came out that there is a relation between the time sex does not influence the injury incidence
of training in a unit and the incidence of injuries In addition, the present findings are in agreement
The above results are in agreement only in part with with the findings of Bak et al. [1] as for the fact that the
the results of other researchers [1,16] who found out male athletes present more injuries at the upper limbs in
the relation of the injuries in general to the duration of
contrast with the female athletes. This result is justified
training.
by the fact that men accept more burdening at the upper
The lower limb was the injury site most often re-
limbs in most of the equipment like rings, horizontal
ported by the gymnasts. The supremacy of the lower
bar and parallel bars. This opinion supports the fact
limb injuries of female artistic gymnasts goes together
with the data of most searching studies in which the of the lack of injuries at the shoulder joint for women
great participation of the lower limbs in the injuries is in the present study and the existence of more injuries
reported. This greater incidence is reported in the data at the wrists for the men. Moreover, the fact that the
of Steel and White 34 with 69%, and lower in the find- women presented greater incidence of injuries at the
ings of Garrick and Requa [11] with 48%. This is most elbows is justified by the fact of the different equipment
probably due to the differences that can be found at between men and women, since for women at the three
some important factors in the different like the specifi- out the four equipment should engage hand movement.
cation/determination of the injuries, the level of the ath- From the results it is ascertained that there is no sta-
letes, the size/number of the sample and the planning tistically important relation between injuries and age.
of the research in general [23]. Despite the lack of statistically important differences
The ascertainment that the injuries of the ankle joint it is ascertained that at age up to 10 years for male as
prevail is also justified by the findings of Pfister et well as female athletes, a lower incidence of injuries
Galley Proof 29/04/2003; 14:33 File: bmr79.tex; BOKCTP/wyy p. 6

6 P. Kirialanis et al. / Injuries in artistic gymnastic elite adolescents male and female athletes

appears and there is a tendency to find greater incidence References


of injuries as age increases for male athletes.
The reported results, which have to do with the in-
[1] K. Bak, S. Kalms, S. Olesen and U. Jorgensen, Epidemiology
juries according to the equipment, agree entirely with of injuries in gymnastics, Scand J Med and Sci Sports 4 (1994),
most of the researchers [1,5] who support the fact that 148–150.
the floor is the equipment on which most of the injuries [2] Bale and Goodway, Performance Variables associated with the
happen. competitive Gymnast, Sports Med 10 (1990), 139–144.
These results are related to the fact that the [3] M. Belechri, E. Petridou and D. Trichopoulos, Bunk versus
conventional beds: a comparative assessment of fall injury
time/duration of the training on the floor is greater in risk, J. Epidemiol. Community Health 56 (Jun., 2002), 413–
comparison to other events [1]. The present findings are 417.
in contrast with three other research findings. Specif- [4] P. Bernard, J. Salmela and T.B. Hoshizaki, World International
ically, Weiker [39] supported that most injuries hap- Systems for Gymnastic Talent, Sport Psyche Editions Canada,
1998, pp. 115–117.
pen on balance beam and asymmetric bars. Steel and
[5] D. Caine, B. Cochrane and C. Caine, An epidemiological
White [34] reported greater incidence of injuries for the investigation of injuries affecting young competitive female
female athletes on the horse vault. Finally, Lowry and gymnasts, Am J of Sport Med 17 (1989), 811–820.
LeVeau [18] supported that most injuries happen on the [6] R.M. Daly, S.L. Bass and C.F. Finch, Balancing the risk of
parallel bars for male athletes. injury to gymnasts: how, Vective are the counter measures, Br
J Sports Med 35 (2001), 8–20.
Although the injury rate in this sport is high, ac- [7] M. de Loes, Medical treatment and costs of sports related
cording to severity assessments only 29% of the cases injuries in a total population, Int J Sports Med 11 (1990),
involved major injuries. 66–72.
The ascertainment that there is a total lack of seri- [8] M. Dixon and P. Fricker, Injuries to elite gymnasts over 10yr,
ous injuries is in correspondence with the findings of Med and Scie in Sports and Exer 25(12) (1993), 1322–1329.
[9] R. Dzioba, Gymnastics, in: Injuries in Sports, A. Stergioulas,
Dixon [8]. It would be difficult of course to support ed., Athens: Symmetria Publishing, 1985.
that artistic gymnastics is a risky sport. According to [10] J. Ekstrand and J. Gilliquist, The avoidavility of soccer in-
Dr. L. Eglise, who is responsible for the medical team juries, Int Sport Med 4 (1983), 124–128.
of FIG, artistic gymnastics is not a dangerous sport but [11] J. Garrick and R. Regua, Epidemiology of women’s gymnastic
injuries, Am J of Sport Med 8 (1980), 226–264.
a risky one. [12] J. Goodway, Gymnastic: Injuries within the United Kingdom,
M.Phhil. thesis. Brighton Polytechnic, 1989.
[13] W.B. Kibler, T. Jeff Chandler and R.E. Maddux, A muscu-
5. Conclusion loskeletal approach to the preparticipation Physical examina-
tion, Preventing injury and improving performance, Am J of
The present study supports that a higher injury rate Sports Med 17(4) (1989), 525–531.
occurred on the floor exercises (boys and girls) espe- [14] J. Kingma and H.J. Ten Duis, Sports members’ participation
cially on landing (girls). This high incidence, which is in assessment of incidence rate of injuries in five Sports from
records of hospital-based clinical treatment, Perc and Motor
due to large resistance amount placed on lower limbs Skills 86(2) (1998), 675–686.
joints, especially on the knee and ankle ligaments, in- [15] G.S. Kolt and R.J. Kirkby, Epidemiology of women’s gym-
creased the risk acute injury factor. nastics injuries, in: 2nd Maccabiah-Wingate International
These findings are alarming and should be consid- Congress on Sport and Coaching Sciences: Proceedings, Ne-
ered by coaches and sport medicine personnel in the tanya (Israel), G. Tenenbaum and T. Raz-Liebermann, eds,
Wingate Institute, 1993, pp. 241–254.
light of developing and implementing injury preven- [16] G. Kolt and R. Kirkby, Epidemiology of injury in elite and
tion programs on floor exercises (especially landing), subelite female gymnasts: A comparison of retrospective and
directed at gymnastic participants. prospective findings, Br J Sports Med 33 (1999), 312–318.
[17] K.J. Lindner and D.J. Caine, Can J of Sport Sci 15(4) (1990),
254–261.
6. Recommendations [18] C.B. Lowry and B.F. LeVeau, A retrospective study of gym-
nastic injuries to competitors and noncompetitors in private
clubs, Am J of Sports Med 10(4) (1982), 237–239.
Learning of safety and proper technique (especially [19] N. Maffulli, J.B. King and P. Helms, Training in elite young
on floor exercises and during landing phase) in order athletes the Training of young athletes (TOYA) study: injuries,
to assist gymnasts in learning skills, to correct body flexibility and isometric strength, British Journal of Sports
position and to develop confidence. Medicine 28(2) (1994), 123–136.
Use of safety devices and protective equipment (mat- [20] N. Malliaropoulos, A. Papalada, D. Christodoulou, S. Pa-
padopoulou and M. Averkiou, Epidemiologic study of lower
ting, sprung floors, hand guards, etc.) in order to reduce limb injuries on tack and field athletes in the decade 1988–
the magnitude of impact and frictional forces imposed 1998, 5th International Congress of Northern Greek Sports
on the musculoskeletal system. Medicine Organization 42 (1999).
Galley Proof 29/04/2003; 14:33 File: bmr79.tex; BOKCTP/wyy p. 7

P. Kirialanis et al. / Injuries in artistic gymnastic elite adolescents male and female athletes 7

[21] E. McAuley, G. Hudash, K. Shields, G. Albright, G. Garrick Churchill Livinsgstone Inc., 1992, pp. 7–8.
and R. Wallac, Injuries in Women’s Gymnastics. The state of [31] S. Roy, D. Caine and K.M. Singer, Stress changes of the distal
the art, Am J of Sports Med 15 (1987), 558–565. radial epiphysis in young gymnasts, Am J of Sports Med 13
[22] J. McMeeken, E. Tully, B. Stillman, C. Nattrass, I.L. Bygott (1985), 301–308.
and I. Story, The experience of low back pain in young Aus- [32] W.A. Sands, B.B. Shultz and A.P. Newman, Women’s gym-
tralians, Man Ther 6(4) (Nov. 2001), 213–220. nastics injuries, A 5-year study, Am J of Sports Med 21(2)
[23] R. Meeusen and J. Borms, Gymnastic injuries, Sports (1993), 271–276.
Medicine 13(5) (1992), 337–356. [33] M. Schootman, J.W. Powell and J.P. Albright, Sport injury
[24] W.H. Meeuwisse, Assessing causation in sport injury: a mul- Research, Sport Medicine 18(1) (1994), 23–37.
tifactorial model, Clin J Sports Med 4 (1994), 166–170. [34] V. Steel and J. White, Injury Prediction in Female Gymnasts,
[25] A. Nattiv and B.R. Mandelbaum, Injuries and special con- Br J Sports Med 7(4) (1986), 31–33.
cerns in female gymnasts, Detecting, treating, and preventing [35] E.M. Tenvergert, H.J. Ten Duis and H.J. Klasen, Trends in
commonproblems, Physician and Sportsmedicine 21 (1993), Sports injuries 1982–1988: an in-depth study on Four types
66–83. of Sports, J of Sports Med and Phy Fitness 32(2) (1992),
[26] J. Nicholas and E. Hershman, The Lower extremity and Spine, 214–220.
The CV Mosby Company, St Louis, 1990, pp. 1510–1511. [36] I.R. Tofler, B.K. Stryer, L.J. Micheli et al., Physical and emo-
[27] F.A. Petrone and E. Ricciardelli, Gymnastic injuries: the Vir- tional problems of elite female gymnasts, N Engl J Med 335
ginia experience 1982–1983, Am J of Sports Med 15(1) (1987), (1996), 281–283.
59–62. [37] W. Van Mechelen, J. Twisk, A. Molendijk, B. Blom, J. Snel
[28] A. Pfister, W. Pfoerringer and B. Rosemeyer, Deutsche and H. Kemper, Subject related risk factors for Sport injuries:
Zeitschrift Epidemiologie Von Verletzungen in Jahres a 1-yr prospective study in young Adults, Med and Sci in
Analysies Von 8819 Verletzungsarten, Sport Med (Cologne Sports and Exer (1996), 1171–1179.
F.R.G) 36(10) (1985), 291–294. [38] G.G. Weiker, Musculoskeletal problems and the gymnast, Ad-
[29] T.D. Poulsen, K.G. Freund, F. Madsen et al., Injuries in high- vances in Sports Medicine and Fitness 2 (1989), 177–200.
skilled and low-skilled soccer: A prospective study, Br J [39] G.G. Weiker, Injuries in club gymnastics, The Phys and Sport
Sports Med 25 (1991), 151–153. Med 13(4) (1985), 63–66.
[30] D. Reid, Sports Injury Assessment s and Rehabilitation

S-ar putea să vă placă și