Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Indian History
N.Nandhivarman
1
1.Hidden history unmasks …… Nehru
Quite some time since my series of blogs on Aurobindo Ghose
stopped for temporary reprieve , many friends suggested to me to
write on the other-side of the historical spectrum and views held
by personalities in conflict. As a democrat groomed by Aringnar
Anna, I felt I must place for public consumption historical
moments in India.
A: “Great men are of great service to their country but they also,
after certain time, a great hindrance to the progress of their
country. There is one incident in Roman history which comes to
my mind on this occasion. When Caesar was done to death and the
matter was reported to Cicero, Cicero said to the messengers : Tell
the Romans that your hour of liberty has come. While one regrets
the assassination of Mr.Gandhi and one cannot help finding in his
heart the echo of the sentiments expressed by Cicero on the
assassination of Cicero.’
2
A: In his book Reminiscences of Nehru Age by M.O.Mathai page
24, the words of Ambedker on accomplishment of the task is
mentioned thus : The Hindus wanted Vedas, and they sent for
Vyasa, who was not a caste Hindu. The Hindus wanted an epic ,
and they sent for Valmiki, who was an untouchable. The Hindus
wanted a Constitution and they have sent for me….’ Ambedkar.
3
Q: Is it true that Dr.Ambedkar found it difficult to print his book
Buddha and His Dhamma ?
4
2.CHINA : THORN TO INDIA’s EXISTENCE
India’s foreign policy makers must watch the Chinese moves in
each and every issue in international arena. China had been for
years scheming to become the sole Super Power of Asia. Nothing
wrong in any nation to aspire for higher status, but that status
when it tends to downsize India, it is our duty to counter Chinese
dragon.
But the threats from China are not only in our border but
everywhere. Unless India watches every move of China, we will fail
in our patriotic duty to preserve our nation and its status among
comity of nations. “India and China are now members of the
Financial Stability Board, the apex institution to monitor global
risks of financial crisis. Their voting shares in the International
Monetary Fund will also be slightly increased through an
accelerated quota reform process. However post-reform the USA
will retain its de-facto veto power with a 17 percent share and the
US, EU and Japan will control 53 percent of IMF shares.
Individually the shares of US, UK, France and Japan will still be
larger than China’s share of fewer than 4 percent.” Hence China
5
had planned a new offensive according to Professor of National
Institute of Public Finance and Policy Mr.Sudipto Mundle.
USA realizing the Chinese designs had been urging India to sign
End-use Monitoring Agreement, Communications Interoperability
and Security Memorandum agreement, and Logistics Support
Agreement. China causes grave concern for USA, hence USA urges
India to sign these pacts. China had become emboldened to say to
USA to concentrate on western Pacific and China will look after
eastern Pacific. Pacific Command Chief Admiral Timothy J
Keating had recently exposed this game.
6
claims our Indian State of Arunachal Pradesh will be a threat with
high magnitude?
7
Borders and Boundaries: Follies galore
India must publish maps showing Tibet as independent country
under occupation of Chinese. Only then Chinese maps on Jammu
and Kashmir could be countered effectively. There is a Tibetan
Government in exile within Indian soil and we are within our right
to declare Tibet as disputed area which belong to Tibetan people.
Having said the way to counter Chinese moves, as impassionate
observer of history let me share my thoughts with readers and
invite a debate.
The maps of 1930 show Indian border in North East sector, which
is McMahon line between India’s Assam and Tibet region as
Boundary Un-demarcated. In Northwest, North sectors [from
Kashmir Ladakh to Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh it was
inscribed as boundary undefined. Miss Dorothy Woodman in her
book Himalayan Frontiers in 1969 wrote, “The innumerable
discrepancies on maps might lead to the most naïve student of
cartography to the view that the devil can quote maps to serve its
own purpose.” The discrepancies in maps are a disease infecting
both sides. Both countries based their claims on erroneous maps.
8
BANGLADESH BORDERS:
The legacy of past not only haunts India and China, it also hurts
India and Bangladesh. There are 111 Indian enclaves in
Bangladesh and 51 Bangladesh enclaves in India.” The legacy of
high stake card games between two kings, rulers of Cooch Bihar
and Rangpur within old Bengal State centuries ago where they
used estates as stakes when they ran out of cash, resulted in our
nation having Bangladesh enclaves and Bangladesh having our
enclaves. This is an issue, which had not been sorted out yet; it
applies to the Indo China border dispute.
BUREAUCRATIC BLUNDERS
9
to Kashmir. This indecision resulted in ever bleeding never-ending
Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan. It is not treason to
look back at history. This today BJP claims that nation had paid
heavy price for Nehru’s folly.
Respected Atalji
All Indians will echo your feelings with regards to the Pakistan’s
bartering away of Kashmiri territory to China, our neighbour. At
the moment out of the total area of 222.336 square kilometers of
Kashmiri state the possession is as follows:
10
Illegally handed over to China by Pakistan:
42,735 square kilometers
11
Congress governments that caused this national loss to our
country?
12
THE OTHERSIDE
With the blessings of Jinnah and with the backing of the Secretary
of the Political Department Sir Conrad Cornfield it seems Princely
India will be separate entity once India got independence.
13
Q: Among the princely states who declared independence first,
and who changed his colours like chameleon and headed a
committee to ban political parties that sought separatism ?
Q: How all the princely states were brought into the Indian
umbrella ? To whom the credit should go ?
Q:Plundering natural resources and land scams are not new, even
in British India such things happened, and even in independent
India it continues, especially in naxal infected Bastar. Tell about
this ?
14
minor prince, foreigner Prime Minister can enter into mortgaging
a whole state. Patel saw the Prince of Bastar and said “ I felt it was
a sin to make him sign such agreement. It was then that I was
made fully conscious of the extent to which our interests were
prejudiced in every way by the machinations of the Political
Department and came to the conclusion the sooner we were rid of
these people the better. Their main aim was to further their
interests and to cause much damage to India as possible. I came to
the conclusion that the best course was to drive out foreigners
even at the cost of partition of the country.It was also then that I
felt that there was only one way to make the country safe and
strong.. and that was unification of rest of India.
15
4. AUROBINDO BIRTH PLACE
CONTROVERSY
Archives of Dravida Peravai
You might be aware that Calcutta High Court on 10th May 1999 has
passed an interim injunction in the writ petition No: 1035 of 1999
at the Court of Kalyan Jyothi Sengupta till next hearing in June in
the writ petition filed by Dr.Barin De against Sri Aurobindo
Bhavan.
15th August 1872, 24 minutes [ one danda= one ghatika] before sun
rise at Calcutta, with sun rise calculated at 5.40 AM, the time of
birth is 5.16 AM local time or 4.52 AM Indian Standard Time.
16
A note from the files of Nolini Kanta Gupta :
17
Letter of Showlata Das [Mrs.Banbihari Das] youngest daughter of
Manmohan Ghose dated 11th June 1956.
18
2. The Ballard’s Building consisting of numbers 47, 48, 49 and 50
at the corner of Chowringhee and Theatre Road does no longer
exist, in fact a multi-storied building is under construction at that
place. The question of acquisition of this property does not,
therefore arise.
19
based Trust are aware of the truth and that may be the reason for
these groups to offer Aurobindo Bhavan for construction of a
commercial complex.
Our party urges the West Bengal Government to probe this matter
further and fix responsibility on those who have misled the West
Bengal Government and committed a fraud on the Government
and followers of Aurobindo…… Yours sincerely N.Nandhivarman,
General Secretary Dravida Peravai
20
THE OTHERSIDE
21
Mahatma Gandhi wanted to write calling for expulsion of
Mr.T.Prakasam but was persuaded to drop that idea by Jawaharlal
Nehru and Patel. Konda Subba Rao, the whistle blower who
brought out this corrupt practice also wrote to Congress President
Rajendra Prasad. Congress President asked Congress Secretary
Shankar Rao Dev to probe the charges against Former Chief
Minister T.Prakasam and then Chief Minister Kumarasamy Raja.
Since he could not decide the matter it was handed over to a three
member committee comprising Jawaharlal Nehru, Rajendra
Prasad and Sardar Patel, who exonerated Mr.T.Prakasam and let
off other Ministers since they were not in office and thus closed
the chapter in February of 1950.
22
certificate hailing his cleanliness, thus brushing aside a Report of
an Enquiry Commission. Thus Congress set up a third
precedent to throw enquiry commission reports into
archives, which resulted in all political leaders inducted
by subsequent enquiry commissions getting away
without punishment.
23
listed French Sofma gun and Swedish Bofors gun. On May 1985
Defence Secretary Bhatnagar summoned the representatives of the
4 suppliers and told them that Government of India does not want
any Indian agents to be involved in the negotiations, and whatever
amounts are being paid to Indian agents by the supplier should be
reflected in the reduced prices. Till that time Bofors was
represented by their Indian agent Mr. Win Chadha, originally an
accused, but who died during the proceedings. No decision was
taken even up to the 18th meeting of the negotiating committee
which took place on December 1985. However the Army on
February 18th of 1986 informed the negotiating committee its
technical opinion in favor of Bofors gun. At the 20th meeting of the
negotiating committee letter of intent was issued to Bofors on
March 14 of 1986. Few days before that on March 10th of 1986 in a
confirmation letter stated “We hereby confirm that we do not have
any representative / agent specially employed in India for this
project.” Indian Prime Minister Mr.Rajiv Gandhi who attended
the funeral of Swedish Prime Minister Olaf Palme announced the
decision to buy Bofors gun on that occasion.
24
In 2010 Malaysia reduces petrol price from Rs.30.12 per litre to
Rs.20.99 and our neigbour Pakistan reduces from Rs 36.09 to Rs
31.43. The incompetent unintelligent Finance Ministers of these
countries are reducing the burden on the consumer and Indian
Finance Minister Pranab Mukerjee in this year imposed import
duty and excise duty, further thrown out petroleum prices from
government control to the play of market prices. This had hiked
petrol price, is one side of the story.
The iron ore exported by the year 2000-2001 was around Rs 358
crores whereas by 2008-2009 it went up to 21,725 crores. One ton
25
of iron ore was exported from 6000 to 7000 depending upon its
grade. The Lok Ayuktha of Karnataka Justice Santhosh Hegde
found out that government was getting royalty of Rs 16 to Rs 27
per ton. In 2004, low grade iron ore per ton royalty to Karnataka
Government was Rs 4, high grade ore fetched Rs 27 per ton. As per
Karnataka government estimates extraction of per ton iron ore
costs Rs 150. Even if transport of Rs 250 is added plus royalty of
Rs 27, at port the price per ton was Rs 427, whereas export price
was equal to Rs 7000. Government was only getting Rs 27 per ton
allowing Reddy brothers to pocket huge profits. Santhosh Hegde
brought this out. The Planning Commission of India woke up to
this loot in 2005 and suggested that at least 10 percent of export
price should be taxed. The Manmohan Singh’s clean government
waited for 3 years thinking how to subvert this suggestion of the
Planning Commission. The Ministry accepted the proposal mooted
by Planning Commission in 2009 August, but with a tactic.
Government appointed Indian Bureau of Mines to fix the export
price in order to calculate taxable royalty. Those officials fixed for
low/high grades export price at Rs 1760 and 1949, when actual
exports were ranging between 6000 to 7000. To fix 10 percent of
royalty for Rs 1760 and 1949 super brain of Pranab Mukerjee got
immense satisfaction. Even a child knows that exports are made
under Letters of Credit and once loaded in ship, the bill of lading is
given and these documents are produced in banks to negotiate
bills. If an idiot like me was Finance Minister, I would have
ordered for 10 percent deduction for royalty when banks negotiate
bills. Ordinary citizen’s taxes could be deducted, but how can
corporate be deducted, this government may argue. There is no
export duty for minerals but import duty for petroleum products.
If this being the case petrol prices have to go up, onion prices
should have wings to fly in sky, and our economist Manmohan
Singh will be proud of his governance.
26
Gandhi a prophet wanted Congress to be dismantled, and we are
paying the price since his own party had become a puppet of
plunderers and profiteers in the corporate world.
www.dravidaperavai.org.in
Puducherry 605001
dravidaperavai@gmail.com
27
DRAVIDIANS ARE NOT SON’S
OF SOIL :JUDGES SPIT
VENOM
28
Tribes [ Prevention of Atrocities Act] 1989 but confirmed
conviction under Indian Penal Code to enable them to pay fine of
Rs 5000 each to the victim. This matter came up for appeal in
Supreme Court before the bench of Learned Judges, who instead
of limiting their judgment over legal issues had become historians
to declare that India is largely a country of immigrants. The Hindu
in its center page quotes these overnight historians and proclaims
“A Supreme Court Judgment projects the historical thesis that
India is largely a country of old immigrants and that pre-
Dravidian aborigines, ancestors of present Adivasis, rather than
Dravidians were the original inhabitants of India. Dravidian
movement that rules Tamilnadu must debate this in the
Legislative Assembly and pass resolution condemning the
unnecessary attack uncalled for to denigrate the Dravidian history.
At least scholars should have ventured to criticize this part of the
judgment. If this goes unchallenged the Aryans would exploit this
as gospel.
“Hindu law was not uniform for all Hindus and as such
codification was the only solution and necessity as it aimed at
consolidation of Hindu society” felt Dr.B.R.Ambedkar. He strongly
felt that the present Hindu law was inconsistent with the
provisions of the article 15 of Constitution that birth shall not
discriminate any citizen on ground of birth. Hence his futile
attempt to introduce the Hindu Code Bill which was opposed by
Rajendra Prasad. Speaking in clause by clause discussion in
Parliament Ambedkar said “The fact is that in this country
although religions have changed the law has remained one. As
early as 1930 the Privy Council in its judgment had lain down that
Sikhs were governed by Hindu Law. The application of the code to
Sikhs, Buddhists and Jains was a historical development to which
they could not give any answer. They could only change the law to
make it equitable whenever it went wrong. Dr.Ambedkar would
not agree to exclude Punjab from the purview of the Bill. “I would
have the Code apply to whole of India or not at all “he thundered.
29
Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru informed Ambedkar that
there is opposition both inside and outside to the bill, and the
Cabinet would discuss the matter in beginning of September 1951.
Dr.Ambedkar was keen to pilot the bill before 1952 General
Elections. After passing 4 clauses of the Bill further consideration
of the Bill was dropped. So after 4 years I month and 26 days in
Cabinet, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar submitted his resignation as Law
Minister on 27th September of 1951. If Ambedkar’s vision of a
Uniform Code had been realized different Courts interpreting laws
in different manner and sympathizing with offenders of the
modesty of a woman would not have have happened.
30
of Sangene that was most common across the planet. During the
worst period of Ice Age 60,000 years ago when the worlds
moisture was locked in giant glaciers causing intense draught in
Africa the first batch of Africans moved out.
www.bradshawfoundation.com website displays pictorial
explanation of human migration from Africa.
This theory says whole world migrated from Africa, and the claim
by learned judges that India had aborigines before migrations took
place stands demolished.
31
the nearby island of Komodo- they are called Komodo dragons.
Elephants because of their buoyancy are surprisingly good
swimmers and those that reached Flores evolved to dwarfs from
the size of ox. Previous excavations by M.J.Morewood a member
of the team that found little Floresians showed that homo erectus
arrived on Flores about 8,40,000 years ago as was evident from
crude stone tools. Presumably the descendents of the homo
erectus became subject to the same evolutionary forces that
reduced the size of elephants. The first little Floresian, an adult
female was found in September 2003 buried under the 20 feet of
silt that coats the floor of Liang Bua Cave in Flores. A team of
experts identified the skeleton which was not fossilized as a very
small but otherwise normal individual similar to homo erectus,
reports New York Times drawing substance from Nature
magazine.
32
Thompson in the Hidden history of Human Race include
convincing evidence that anatomically modern humans may have
been present on the Earth not just for 1,00,000 years or less [the
orthodox view] but for millions of years and that metal objects of
advance design may have been in use at equally early periods.
Moreover although sensational claims have been made before
about out of place artifacts, they have never been supported by
such overwhelming and utterly convincing documentation as
Cremo and Thompson, writes Graham Hancock in his preface.
33
“Blood samples from three South Indian populations , the
Piranmalai Kallars, Yadhavas and Saurastrians all of whom live in
Madurai, the Azhagiri land, have showed up genetic markers
identical to those found in 10 percent of Malaysians, 15 percent of
New Guineans, and 60 percent of Australian aborigines evidence
which had not been obtained by archaeology so far” says Professor
R.M.Pitchaiappan Head of the Department of Immunology ,
School of Biological Sciences. Madurai Kamaraj University. These
blood samples were collected from hill, coastal and plain based
communities like Piranmalai Kallars,Yadhavas, Saurastrians,
Moolakurumbas, Kurumbas, Irulas, Paniyas, Kotas, Thodas,
Kanikars, and Paravars. What has come as a surprise is nearly 50
percent of a 30,000 year old gene marker among Piranmalai
Kallars. The Yadhavas and Saurastrians possessed a 10,000 year
old gene marker. So instead of trying to look for immigrants from
North West, wherefrom Aryans came, the learned judges must
look for immigration from Pacific and Indian Ocean lands of
submergence. The gene markers of South Indian Dravidian people
proves to be 30,000 year old and disproves the theory propounded
by learned judges that they are immigrants and not aborigines.
34
Australia , Cambridge University Press, 1980] agree that all of
them still retain features of their original genetic unity. Dixon
points out that as regards of affinity of Proto-Australian with other
language families of the world only the Dravidian suggestion
deserves to be taken seriously.
35
So Dravidians migrated towards East, they are not immigrants
from East. If scholars establish that even Australian aboriginals
have descended from Dravidians, how come learned judges adopt
a policy to show Indian aboriginals as not belonging to Dravidian
family. May be the Aryan mind is disturbed over the fact they are
immigrants and wants to thrust that status on Dravidians and find
sadistic satisfaction. I could see neither logic nor legal compulsion
in judges choosing to interpret Indian history in a case which has
no relevance to this question.
N.Nandhivarman
36