I-.t.

L_ t-,t*7
F:iZ
'1 p1j ,ur,-l
q^ rF rF;r L- A/ \A/ lYT t l ,l

Affiant,
GuyMadison Neighbors,suijuns,a naturatcitizen
of theRepubticof Kansas,
common manof thesovereign peopte,doesswearandaffir,m
thatAffjantscribes
reaatheforegoingfacts,andin accordance
withthebestof Affiant's
knowteCge
110 and
conviction,
sucharetrue,correct,andnotmisteading,
thetruththewhotetruth,Jndnothing
butthetruth,

,,r,"0 ryfu,L.- /kdtL suijuris

dHGuyMadisonNeighbors
fi

T h i sA f f i d a v i tr s d a t e d

NOTARYPUBLIC

(TATtr .\tr t\I ' \

Jr^rLvt tI.L.,,

)qq

subscribed
andswornto me, a Notarypubtic,the abovesigned
by GuyMadison
Neighbors,

Y- aoll

fo\yCommission
Expires,

SEALOF NOTARY

t' , (', f c,6r,n<

4rla'il"bors
p, Ciar,y l)'r^rcL'r L{,s. /l1r'nr-if^r,ts
-icl,r14 !to,',ct
'p*,>l
.)o'un,nP"\+t , 6's,{r.-cit
ffl(,\,!i^(
'i1,5. Cc:u'rfo'f-raPP't.,.[s c,'f-
1,i''hr
Sa,kl,-,8 /U6C
)Dlsor{s.
K'(' ;{*c"{"
L {,5 ' '4 T) t[r iY ,^ ,
L"tL{ t[ 'lL tt S'
t',i", \or ')
(+t"r*1 6<,'*,-ri{,'' .ff"l+':
pc',ki't t-lt\'ct\
Llur,1r<']
L \ , ! D .u t .
.7
;.'
INTHEUNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
FORTHE
DISTRICT
EASTERN OFKANSAS
EASTERN
DIVISION

UNITED OFA,MERICA, )
STATES
(FlcTrTrous
PARTY) )
ptaintiff, ) Nos,10-3202
Case
v. ) 10-3203
)

10-3204
CARRIEM. NEIGHBOF:S ) D.C.NOs.7:Oi-cr-2A124
(Beneficiary) ) 7:08-cr-20105-CM-JPO-1
Defendant
1 ) 2:07-cr-20073-CM-1
)Trust# 983160-340348-080047
GUYM. NEIGHBORS )lssueDateEB:Y3160:A48:54:M3:D1
(Beneficiary) )Trust# 983158-31
0405-020026
Defendant2 )lssueDateE8:Y3158:45:Sl:M4:D3

' 1/15/2011

JUDICIAL
NOTICE BYWAYOFAFFIDAVIT ''FRAUD"
ONTHECOURT.
OFDAVID E. NITZ'SPERJURY, AND
DAVIDE. NITZTHEUNDERSIGNEDUNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTOR,THECOMPLAINANT BEING
DULYSWORN, lN THECRIMINALCOMPLAINT
lN CASE# 08-mj-8077-01/02-jpoANDCASE # 2:08-cr-70105-cm-jpo,
'PERJURY" THECRIMINAL
HASCOMMITTED IN FEDERAL
COURT INVIOLATION OF18 U.S.C,1621, BYSIGNING
COMPLAINT
AGAINST THESEDEFENDANTSCLAIMINGTO BEAN INJURED PARry
WHENHEISNOT,FURTHERMORE MR.NITZ15A U,5.POSTALINSPECTOR ANDNOTA LAWENFORCEMENT
OFFICER
ANDISOPERATING OUTSIDEOFHISJURISDICTION.INWHICH HECLEARLY ADMITSIN HISAFFIDAVIT.

COMES NOWCarrieM. Neighbors Defendant

1 andor GuyM. Neighbors .2) o;rthis_
Deferrdan'. dayof February
2011,actingsuijurisis givingJUDlCl.il
NOTICESandaffirmsthat the foregoing affidavitis True,Correct,and
Compteteto the bestof my knowledge anobetiefarrcinot i'iiisleadi;ig.

Mr. DavidE. Nitzunlawfullysigning of the cnminalcomptaint asan agentinvestigatingthe attedgedcnminal

conduct,is "Fraud"uponthe courtin the fact that he is NOTA VlCTlM,andthjsfraudwasusedto securethe
indictment , in whichthe fraudulent lndictment MUST be DISMISSED.
FurthenroreDavidE. Nitz a postalinspector, is NOTan law enforcement officerandis actingout sideof his
jurisdiction.
Mr, Nitzclearly admitsin the "Affidavit"that he is responsibil.ities, of 18u.s.c.13{1,
inctudeinvestigations
 werechargedunder
witt showthe defendants
Fraudsand Swjndte(maitfraud),Howeverthe criminalcomptaint
18u.s,c.1512(c),NOT1341in whjchMr, Nitzis operating out sjdeof hisareaof alsoMr,Nitzhad
expertise,
they purchasedthereforeN0
Faittopresenta singtewitnesswhowitttestifythey did NoT receivethe merchandise
Fraudexistedin the case,thereforeMr. NitzhasNOjust causeto be harassing owners
thesebi-racialbusiness
otherthan his own"RacialBias"
jncludebut NOTtimitedto:
Mr. Nitz hasplacedhim setfin a positionto be hetdtiabtefor theseFetonyCrimes,to
1. Defamation.
2. "Deprivation of Rightsundercolorof the Law"18 u's'c' 242.
3. "Conspiracy against Rights" 18u.s.c.241'
'lB
4. "False Dectarations before GrandJuryandthe court" u,s.c.18 1623.
the
5 . " K i d n a p p i n1g8"u . s . c .1 2 0 1 .
6. "lnterference with Commerce by Threator Force"18u.s.c.1951
7. RaciaIDjscrimination /Profiting.

"Dueprocess of Lawand EquatProtectionof Laware secured if att Lawsoperateon atI atike,anddo NOTsubjectthe
individuatto an arbitraryexcriscof the poler of government"
See:Duncan 152,U.5.377,382,
v. Missouri, (1894)'

wai'i'a::t:nclIndictmentDIDNoTshowreasonable
The affidavitusecto securethe fraucir.rlerri Grounds for beliefthat
the accuseddefendants wereGuittyas charged.Theaffidavitshou'ed the postalinspectorreql,ested warian'tioi'an
a
indictmentfor clrargeshe hasNOexpertisein investigating.

ln the affidavit#2, the affiantstateshe is famitiarwith the informatjonbasedon hisinvestigationandthat of the

Lawrence hasbeenprovidedby other
police,the universityof kansaspotice, andhe furtherstatesthat "information
Lawenforcement agencies"Thisagainis "perjury".
lf thereweremoreagencies invotvedtheywoutdbe tistedhere,thisis just a sorryattemptto try andmakethjscase
motivated
appearreal,and[argerthan it reattyis, alsoan attemptto justifythe itlegatactionsinvotvedin this racially
orosecution.

The "BackGround" in the complaintwit[ show,the business ownerscooperated with poticeby returningthe stolen
taptopandtheythey providedthe settersformsfor the officerto inspect and attowed the officerto copyatl of the
sellersinformatjonfrom2 djfferentsellersforms (one not in question).
The business ownersatsoopentydiscussed the setterwith potice,what he hadsotdin the past,and provideda description
of the setter.Thebusiness ownersrefusedto attowthe officerto leavethe business with the ontyproofthe business
ownershadto showthey purchased the item in "good faith",in that the settersform is signedby the setlerstating
the item lSNOTSTOLEN. The businessownershad ptanedto havethe attorneysprovidethe settersformsto the potice
on the fottowingmonday.The defendants wantedtheir attorneysto viewthe setlersform in its originalstate, andthey
sharedthisinformationwjth the officerandhe just happened to teavethis part of conversation out of the report,
in orderto makeit appearthe defendants were not cooperating'
Theinformation contained in the Crimrnai Cornplaintwil.tctearl.yshowthe defendants werecooperating eventhough
the poticedid NOThavea "Warrant".

ownerthe iaptop
The postarlnspectoradmittedthe setlertestifiedin an interviewthat he did not tett the business
wasstoten.
The charges weredismissed andthe defendants werereteased from their unIawfu[12 daystayin a federaIdetention
center.Whenthe prosecutors casefe[[ apartin court,she ctaimed the defendantshad providedaltereddocuments
to the court(in the settersforms).Whjchwasa "perjury"
and an attempt to saveher fraudulentcase.

DavidE. Njtzwasin an agreementbetweentwo or morepersons to commita Cnmeor accomplish a [ega[purpose

throughittegalaction.
The newindictmentwasmanufactured throughfraud,absentanyGrandJuryproceedings, and the otdwarrantand
criminalcomptaint casedatedAug.Bthwasreusedin an effort to coverup the originalunlawful
from the dismissed
arrestandfederaldetentionof 12days'
Mr.Nitzcleartyactedon the baisesof prejudicein thiscasewith thesebusjnessowners,evidenceof thisfact woutd
be shownin the fact that the postalinspector
Refused to Mr.
arrest in
samptes the samematter,by raidinghis
homewjth 8-10poticeofficersfrom 3 djfferentagencies'
 Mr.'RobertSamptes (thesellerof the stotenproperty)wasattowedto turnhim setfjn to [oca[potice,andwas
NEVERCH/RGED in Federalcourt,and after steating31,000.00 worthof propertyfrom the university
(whichwassotdto the [oca[pawnshops,andthosebusiness ownerswerenot arrestedandjaitedin a Federat pnson),
Mr.Sampleswassentenced to JUST30 daysin countyjai[, in whichhe served,andnowhe js donewith thislegaIissue.
TheNeighborsstitl havea federaIcasependingin federalcourtfrom thiscasethat NEVER went Federalfor Mr Samples.

PostalinspectorDavidNitzis Not a law enforcementofficer,andhe worksfor a corporationthat is illegattyusing

policepowers.
Thebusiness ownerswerearrestedafter choosing to alowthejr attorneysto turn overthe paperworkto the police
because they wereunder2 indictments,cleartytheir "Massiah"rightswereviotatedandthe evidenceshoutdhave
beensuppressed andthe casedismjssed,

U.5. v. Twee[,550F. 2d,297Notification

of [ega[responsibitity dueprocess
is'Thefirstessentiatof of [aw"

Kupferman v, Consolidatedresearch & MFG.Corp.459F.2d 1077(1972)

"Anofficerof the courtstoyattyto the court,as an officerthereofdemands
INTEGRITYandHONEST deatingwith
the court,andwhenhe departsfrom that stanciard he Pi'cpetrates clause
uponthe courtwithinsavings
a FRAUD
of rulegoverningretieffromjudgementor order.Fed.RutesCiv.Proc.rule60 (b) (1,3),28 U.S,C.A.

CONCEALMENT
lSA FUNDAMENTAL,
ESSENTIAL
lN PROVII\G
IvTONEY
LAiiNDRYiNG
Cii;iRGE5:

UNITED STATES v. SANDERS 928F.2d940(1Othcir 1991)

"Moneylaundering statuedoesnot encompass howeverordinaryon thejr face,whichinvolves
a[[ transactions, the
proceeds ofunlawfulactivity; Rather,a Design
to CONCEAL or DISGUISEthe sourceor natureof the proceeds
is
Necessary etement for a MoneyLaunderingConviction.18 u.s.c.'1956
(a),(1),(b), (i)"
The postalinspectorMr. DavidNitz maybewouldhavebeenawareof theseimportantfact if thesecharges werein fact
within his"Expertise"
of investisation.

The defendants in thesecasesnevermadeanyattemptsto CONCEAL or DISGUISE nor wasanyeffort

the proceeds,
to Conceal serialnumberson any propertysoldin the businessor on [ine.
The the merchandise wassotdon a pubticauctionsite,with the serialnumbers
andservicecodenumbers in plain
vjew for publicinspection, ownerspayedfor the propertythey purchased
atsothe business by checks,andusedthe
canceted checksto keeotrackof the taxesthev owned.
 Da"*l
.. - r..,:,i1,
i:;;-i iiilq:,

#rm'Effi
'$
sTArEsDlsTRlcT
lN THEUNITED -B FH 3 i
c,otd$Trrn
UUN""
FORTHEDISTRICTOF KANSA$
' " i ri ii'iiiltEN
Tii'lu1ii
UNITEDSTATESOF AMERICA, ) ;L'iRil
) $y=ri;..'ETlFi?trt
Plaintiff, ) " ,rTtiI'tisl.s
)
vs. )
) No. 08-lvlJ-8077-01'102*JPO
GUYS. NEIGHBORS, )
and )
cARRtENEIGHBORS, )
)
Deferidants. )
)

CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT
l, DavidE. Nitz,the undersigned
complaintant statethe following
beingdulysworn,

is true and correctto the bestof my knowledgeand belief:

COUNT1

On or aboutAugustB, 2008,in the Districtof Kansas,the defendants,

GUYS. NEIGHBORS,
and
CARRIENEIGHBORS,

andotherobject,andattemptedto do so, withthe

corruptlyconcealeda record,document,
intentto impairthe object'sintegrity for use in an officialproceeding;and,
and availability

ctherwiseobstructed,inffuenced,or impededanyofficialproceeding,
andattemptedto do

so, in violationof Title18, UnitedStatesCode$ 1512(c).

AFFIDAVIT

1. l, David E. Nitz, UnitedStates Postal Inspector,United States Postal

foroverI yearswithresponsibilities,
Seryice,havebeenso employed
Inspection including

of Title18,UnitedStatesCode,9gg!i9il941, Fraudsand
of violations
the investigation
(MailFraud).
Swindles
2. withtheinformation
I am familiar co4tained basedupanmy
in theAffidavit

)
/' | :, I n,t'-/t'
, # tffi
fL r vh.L''J ^q
!
er\
 policeDepartmentand
Kansas
Lawrence
of officer MickyRantz,
investigationand that

officerMikeRiner,UniversityofKansasPo|ice.tnformationhasalsobeenprovidedby
'
agenciesand investigators'
otherlaw enforcement )n approximately
t w e e House,
3 ' B a s e d u p o n t h e f o l l o w i n g i n f o r m a t i o n ' l b e l i e v e t h a t bofeYellow
*",nn'..::, owners/operaiors
present,GuyandCarrie
July20oBandthe
lg 0 4 M a s s a ch u se tte sS tre e t,L a wr ence,Kansas66046;havecom m ittedandc onti nueto
'lB' UnitedStatesCode'Section1512(c)'
of Title for
commitviolations for an Arrestwarrant
in supportof an Application
4. This affidavitis made

GuyNeighbors,dateofbirthal|12l1959,andanApp|icationforanArrestWarrantfor
d a teo f b i rth0 B /1 3/1961'
C a r r i eN e i g h b o rs'
BACKGROUND

S.onoraboutAugust6,2a0s,UniversityofKansasPo|icereceivedareport

f r o m C a d e C r u i c k s h a n k , I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n i c i aof
n fKansas. c h o o l o f J o ureported
o r t h e s cruickshank rnalism,abouta
beronging to the University
computer,
missingnewIaptop a Delllaptopcomputer'
to put into usehe noticedthat
computers
that as he was retrieving missing fromthe box' The
serial
42QwrF1, was
and seriarnumber was
moderxpsM1330 reportedthatthe computer
on the box' He
computerwasristed
nurnberof the missing remainedin a
of Kansas in June 2008 and
by the university
purchasedand received

lockedroorn'withlimitedaccess'untilhediscovereditmissing'
6'Cruickshanl<reportedthatonAugust6,2008heconductedaninternet

searchtodetermineifhecou|d|ocatethem i s s i n g c o m p u t e r oUpon
'standupguycharles'' r n e t a uthe
n i n t eviewing ctionsites'He
eBay being sord by
on
found a simirarraptop sameseriarnumber
as that of the
to observe the
postinghe was abre
pictureswith the of the raptop' The
sellerwas
pictureon the website
42ewrF1, in a
missing'aptop, a storagecasefor
the software'
package,
computer,the software
advertisingthe raptap computer'a wall charger
and
a De, carrycaseforthe
setof earbuds,
a softcreaningcroth,

/tt",\-)

2F {r ,,tt'''
- g.r'-
J:

a rechargable
battery--all
of whichWggldhavebeenin the originalboxwhenthe computer
was stolenfrom KansasUniversity,This itemwas listedas postedfor sale on or about

July30,2008. Cruickshank
reportedthisto the University
of KansasPolice,who agreed
to Cruickshank
biddingon the computer,Cruickshank
placedthe winningbid of $960.00
o n Au g u st6 , 2 0 0 8 ,

7. On o ra b o u tA ugust
6,2008,eBayseller ' standupguycharusing
les' ,theem afI
addressof studio64dude@hotmail.com
andnameCharlieRaytoncontacted
Cruickshank
himto makepaymentto CharlieRaytonviatheirrnailingaddressPMB357,
and instructed
3514ClintonParkway,SuiteA, LawrenceKansas00047.
B. On August7, 2008,InspectorDavidE. Nilzvisitedthe UPS Store,which
operatesthe PrivateMailBox(PMB)locationat 3514ClintonParkway,SuiteA, and met
with ChipWaite,Manager.He provided
documents
whichindicateon July7,2007,Carrie
Neighborsopenedthisbox in her nameandcompleted
a U.S.PostalServiceforrn1583,
listing-ody-hemame-as-a-reciplenl
of mailfor this PMB. CarrieNeighborsalso listedan*
All
businessaddressandtelephonenumbers,1904Massachusettes LawrenceKS and 842-
&eK
2785,knownby the affiantto belongto the YellowHouseStore. She alsocompletedthe i nfryi
UPS StoreMailboxServiceAgreementthe same day, but also listedthe names Guy q-

Neiohborsand CharlieRayton. She furtheriistedon the UPS agreementthe ernail

*--YF

address studio64dude@hotmail.oom.
Both the PS Form 1583 and the UPS Store
to provideall nameson form1583. Foi-m1583contains
agreementnotethe requirement

a separatewarningwhichread: "Thefurnishing
of falseor misleading
information
on this
form or omissionof materialinformation
may resultin criminalsanctions(including
fines
and imprisonment)".

9. On August7,2008,in lightof this information,

OfficerRantzand Assistant
U.S.Attorney
TerraMorehead,
madea telephone
callto JohnDuma,attorney
for Carrie
andinformed
Neighborg himof themissing
laptopbelngsoldbvCarrieNeigtlbors.
Durna

€Tr,'alw2
ft-b
 '
't;
.y'
ii:
.i
,:ii
ji!
aboutreturning of Kansas
thelaptopto University
::; agreedto speakto CarrieNeighbors
iit" advised
calfto officerRantz,
police.Duma,in a secondtelephone thatCarrieNeighbors*
laptoptq the policealgngw(h all
the laptopfor sale,would.peviglgthe
was removing
whosoldthelaptopio her.@9l9ld
.tgtheperson
pertaininL
information
withhimfol severa
WelIandhadbeendoi.ryriusjlegs -

likingDe-tectiv9
menli-oned
Slfe specificatly Police'alQ
pf Kan*s3j;
MiklBiner.-University

10. OnAugust7,2008,Detective at theYellow

RinermetwithCarrieNeighbors
\ ,tt
documerrts-pertainiqqto
House,storeand retrievedthe laptopfrom her. He'als'dviev,red

for him. ?glectivenineragree

thereforecould.{fg1-!1elea,eopJ tur-Llbe&X9ry-ng

qr.v]g-$-vrde a-IeqglsllqljhgjglPg1el alO-tq-qqElrl-tle-Eq'rerEq sogqCIg4elgn

fqUbe
DetectiveRinerknowsSamplestq*Le a preventivemaintenalgg*tetlcrgn
Ulyemtty-ofXansas.
11. Rinerreturnedto the YellowHouseStoreto
On August8, 2008,Detective

orovidethem with a evidencesheetfor the la um entati on

(-'
: to oQtainthe
*Bot!_Guy werepresent.Detective
and CarrieNeighbors Rinerrequested

itemsthathadbeenwiththecomputer
additional whichincludedthg-Sotwgre, storage

caseandotlg ggTly!"t-cogponentsfor the laptop,whichwerealsolistedin the eBay

posting, He a|soreqgggllg, 3rrSaclion-as*vuqlLes-U9yggF
s"lg1gsalglut. piovidedthe storagecaseand cornponents
CarrieNeighbors to

DetectiveRiner,butrefusedto provide statingit washers, G-uyNeighbors

the Software,

saidthe salesdocumentswerelockedin a safeandtheywerenot.goilgq-proYid

to_lim. Guy NeighborsfurtheradvisedDetective Rinerthatthey had alreadycalled

andtoldhimthattheyhadbeencontacted bypolicein regards tothe laptopthat

Sarnples
theyhadpurchased fromhrm,Theyfurtherindicated theyplanned to firetheirattorney's
ffi Y 6 nA 'fL,, *,,nt,L) ,fLtr;,
lwuk. bo*l<
4

(rh,?.-'WZ
P,1.tl
 ,'t'-'.;in"
i!'
,rfllt' previousdayfor theirmeetingwith'Detective
N1' becausethey did not cometo Lawrencethe
further
attorneys.Theyrefusedto cooperate
Rinerand that they were goingto hire new

w i t h h i m.
12.onoraboutAugustS,2008,officersoragentsreviewedthe
'New'
.standupguycharles' and foundthe of
operators this were selling
auction
eBaysite
withthe sellingof new items
.Newwithtags' items. sellingof theseitemsis consistent
or
Also the
in the currentinvesiigationof Guy and carrie Neighbors(YellowHouse)'
associatedwiththiseBayauction'are knownto belong
telephonenumber,785-840-5038,
court
have stipulatedin a recent federal
to Guy and carriede.tghbqrqbecausethey
ill{- is also listedon the UPS service
proceedingthat it belongsto th$rii' This number

agreement.
WHEREFORE,your affiantrespectfully requeststhat an arrestwarrantbe
13.
service,withappropriate assistance
issuedauthorizingthe unitedstatespostarInspection
Guy and carrie Neighborsfor violationof
from other law enforcementofficers,to arrest
' P"y ;h*-t p;,Fz- )''"r'sJi'c-fi"'r
, rtl , ,rf
t
rllu_ 1512(c)'.\ne
ls i^ ( u&( Snr ' l' c' t 1]ci { 1la' l i s l ) - .

U'S. PostalInsPector
in my this8th day of August'2008'
presence
sworn to beforeme and subscribed

at KansasCitY,Kansas' r' i .l*'\^.,r

r r,(i yr"'\- Li(riilIo
.1"U '{t o\'Fio
,. {L ,i\ ,,{ <r\ri)

H.T'i,
\.X
t;;::il'*,
h^*.
h^t
\^";i'
o,"
"J. *:*."ff"'t
r , - -i-l .-,,. ana(p,ti

ux-
u.
ad-l&.^!
td-l&.^! uo^L)
uo^tr) Judse
t*\i'ir fl J['h'I if st"tesrvrigistrate
","-ff"lii:t,t: li'*.- Uriili
orKansas
District
?0P",
?"'\ l:] ,i^iY:^ # 'j';;i
r'r"') fwro
6l'iv&)

S\^"*l'14'^F
s. o i1,?^V v[ \i: nnrD,''l-
C+\ ux i:k , ,
"(tu'-'"J {4'"\ t'pt
g)+*+r. Ieltt, -L(m5.,n^r'B.)er ll*) in co';'\ 4r'} s$"kJ
" [$*f {p {ar^l;i td
g'h,;,r 'p''*t 'O proJ'"'a JA
L',^) an) ha) '"'-o{ |"i".' 7Af fult:rS i4.t9/'L*; $.,trvr!
s/to'*xcl't''';
(,eAc^) n)r"ri{\.: J4"f t'u h^;'i^"C;"U ot'1nA
fttn,rT.o.nr) g,-\ "n a(\ 3 So'^t'{4.-
* *r*rltitil
tr ?ror..J,r\**p,J ."p:i, i., tr,,^.F
.Jr"^
^cr^q,,1
Ibs*.*"t,, i ::'f.lji**l*i#
?^u d-a t': *,* ^*Ti.:',f;,|'.Jt
v"v" L44 '/ '
"rD n.r.Lracc_a
L\( -["e ft-au;din1 r _ Lirh,r*'Y,
 -=\-=.-.-,-.-

i41-l lffibi '

United St,aEe,s Dist,riet 8b',Hr',
-8
$8Al.]G PSe 3l
DISTRICTOF KANSAS 'r'rYtll
l Y i ' t .f ' B ' q l I N
-il-[i(K
UNITED
STATESOF AMERICA, n'
'll nFFUTY
) r + ' * , *c i l vK
' s
)
Plaintiff, )
\l
)
) CASENUMBER;
08- MJ- 8077- 0 1- J PO
G U YS . N E I G I j B O R S , ) ' -|
) , : . . ; ' -: .-:. .;.;-- -_ .,
:'--
)
Defendant. )
)

'-.
//: ;
iir-....::ir:..1
: ';.:: =--:':
.llr' r. ,.'.
To; The UnitedStatesMarshal It '4'
,

unCai-ry/ruthoiizedUnitedStatesOfficer
--.1

Yo U A R E H E R E B yC OMMANDED
to ar r estGUy s. NEIGHBoRSancJ
br inghi nr
forthwithto the nearestmagistrate to answei'acompraint '
charginghimwith.on"u)',j,iuu,o'"
record'r'l' 'rrrnent,and oiherobject,
with the intentto irnpairthe object,,,nt*grity
ano
availabilityf'r use in an officialproceedin.g' and, otherwiseobst*rctecj,ir.rfluenced,or
impededany officialproceeding, in violationof rifle 18,unitedstatescode g 1512(c).
._:= .
- -
J a m e sP. O'H a ra_ ..?l-,

Nameoflssuinffi U.S.Vtagistrate ., '-__-*

Titleof lssuing
Officer
- -
.,''
. L

lssdingOfficer Dateand Location

iyt,,lo,l-ft5
T, br s# * /'a n - iL-
( 'ol
I -t

Bailfixed at $ tn'-f t"'L ^ A' t^(+le..ttr

-- - -L-
\^*os
-.-t bv fR--
 4Vl 4UVU' r f llv 1 Ul !

FiLED
U , S . I I S I E 'IO
' TU R T
lH THEUNITED STATE$DlsTRlcT Cotrftf sinlt; rri ilAllsAS
FORT}IE DISTR'CTOF IfiNSAS
UruffEDSTATESOFAfiilERICA, ) ffi ,{IFZO P327
)
Plaintiff, l C L E RUK. ,SO, I $ I R I C O
I URT
)
VC
I BY.Fryl&uTYCLERy
6UY S. HEIGHEORS, ) to5 "{#Wpo
No, o&20
I
and ]
CARRIENEIGFIBORS, I

)
Defendants. )
)

INDICTMENT
Tne GrandJurycharges: i

couNTI
on or aboutAugust8,2008, in the Districtof Kansas,the defendants,

GUY S. NEIGHBORS,
and
CARRIENEIGHBORS,
aiding and abettingeachother corruptlyconcealeda record,document,and other object,

such as cnmputer software,and aftemptedio do so, with the intentto impairthe object's

integrityand availabilityfor use in an olficialproceeding,whichwoufdincludeas evidence

mnceming wire fraud in violationof Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; and,

othenruiseobstructed,influenced,and irnpededany officialproceeding,and aftemptedto

do so, in violationof ritle 18, united stiatescode, sections 1s1z(c) and2.

A TRUEBILL.

Dated: f'20-at

Hl,.rg 6taE;;ffi;"y
Pl'tlt ofG;;;
;6ffi,5f;iifi:*;
'HSit,Iffi:trf,'lt*
(rt isrequested
thattnarsf theabovecaptioned
casebeherdin rGnsas
L;-wW
zYl^
city,Kansas.)
 gtonmerKEJexmpftoyee
servfrnag
finrnefCIrffueftfrosls
bwiEdimgs
cffi{snpdxs
Rv Jesse
Frav

April 1,2A09

Robert Sample

A formel l(ansasIJrTiversity employeeis servingonemonthin DouglasCountyJail,af'ter

fleading guilty to chargesof steaiingthousandsof dolials of equipmcnifi'ornvarjouscarnpus
buildings,courl recordssaid.

Roberl Lee Sample,56, alsowiii spendoneyearon probatioiribr Lhreefelony 1hcItcountsand

was ordered to pay $ 18,650in restitution,pr.osecutors
said.

He was arrestedfbr stealingexpensivecameras,

computers,cleaningitemsand musicai
insfrnments.The thefts werereporledbetweenJune22,20()4, anc)
Aug. I 5, 2tJ0B

Samplewasa building sysremsteclmiciansenior

and lr,orkedat the univcrsitvltrr nearly1B
years.His employmentat KU endedSept.5,2008.

)( I ;. 1l =*
?->rbr,b; fr >
 EE
t.l empE+vee
f,+rsmee"
P:sgrtiEste from a;miv*a'sit3-
tEferEsedof s$emiing

lert 5anp1;

rngtimeF,arsas{Iniversityemployeesuspected of stealingn'ioreihan $i1,000 of'cqurirtrcntfiotlr vrrio"ts

tiiefi clt:irges.
fircusrnuitiplc i'elon1,
rus l.'Lrildiiigs

ert Lee Sample,rvho woiked at the universityfor neariy1B years,is suspoclecitnsevcralcrttninalcases,a

3si /olranlorDoLrglas('ounty Distnct Attomey CharlesBransonsaid.The cases rncludethe theft of erpenstve
ras, computers"cleaningrtcms anclnlusicaljnslruinents Jtlnc 22. 2004, anrl,{ug 1.5,2008
repor""edbetv,reet-l
'i-he
ples emplovmenti:ndedSept -5,2008,sardJrll iess,aI(Lj spol<eswc)1uan buridrngsvslerxstcchntcLan
at the university on Sept 18, 1990.
r began_u,ork

:rdilg io i:rosecu'Loi-s, Sauiple,who turned56 Tuesdai,is strspectin il-ieibllowing crii-ninalcase:;

.eralcleatirngiLegrs,valuedai l;6,059,weretakenfrcm the Stru-ctr,rraiBiology Center.'fheLhel'toccurred
: e n M a r c h Z i t , Z O O S , a n d A Ll 3
r g, 2 0 0 s . T h e s u s p e c t r e t u r n e d t h e s e i t e m : ; t o t h e K U P u b h c S a f e t y O f f i c e
L Canon X'1'drgrtaicameras, valued ar $1,248,were stolen fiom an area in Stauffer-F'lrntl{all that had several
camerasin it that ,;;eren't taken. The thell occurredbetweetr,z\ug 8, 2008, and Aug. 12,2008.
1"427.89lap1o1: coir4tLrter wzlsremovedfronr a siofageroom fi'orttDole FiumanDevcloPiirettt Cenferbetweert
24,2008,and Aug. 6,'2008
ew $1.399iMac computerwas remorrerl h-oman oflce at thc Ar1 & DesignBuilding betweenJuly 3, 2008 and
t, 2408.

Juiy i,
iia.ll betr,veen
i2.000 i5-rnctrAppje MacBook Pro iaptopcomputerwas removecifl-ornStauff'er-Fiint
and July 24, Z00B

r r u r c r o^i,innrcni
ipre vLl uIP rr oi-riof :-]jloragc room fron-lthe Ari & 1]esigr-l
'rlsir..j aL !4,[i95, !\r.Ljremovei.l Builclingbetween
',0,2A08,and
June i2, 2008

rr la-ptopcompllters,valueclat $5,000,were removedfl-om a Stnrng Hall computr:rstorager-oombetweenApril

08, and Aprrl29,20tt8

i,299 Nikon D B0 digita.lcamela r\/asremovedfi'orna metal cabinet at Moore Hail betrveenjuiy 20, 2007, and
5.2007

r i c a i i n s t r u m e n t s , . , . a l u e d a t $ 3 , 0 5 C , u , e r e t a k e n f r o m a l o c k e d r o o m i n N l t c h ob l e n S e p2
l seHt ravl e t 3,2004,
w. D,2A04.