Sunteți pe pagina 1din 58

Modal and Harmonic Analysis using ANSYS

David Herrin, Ph.D.


University of Kentucky
Modal Analysis
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

gUsed to determine the natural frequencies and


mode shapes of a continuous structure

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Review of Multi DOF Systems
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

x1 x2
K1 K2 K3
F1 F2
M1 M2

C1 C2 C3

g Expressed in matrix form as

[M ]{u&&}+ [C ]{u& }+ [K ]{u } = {F }


Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Review of Multi DOF Systems
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

[M ]{u&&}+ [C ]{u& }+ [K ]{u } = {F }

gThe mass, damping and stiffness matrices are


constant with time

g The unknown nodal displacements vary with


time

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Modal Analysis
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS
gA continuous structure has an infinite number of
degrees of freedom
g The finite element method approximates the
real structure with a finite number of DOFs
gN mode shapes can be found for a FEM having
N DOFs
g Modal Analysis
üProcess for determining the N natural frequencies and
mode shapes
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Modal Analysis
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

gGiven “suitable” initial conditions, the structure


will vibrate
ü at one of its natural frequencies
üthe shape of the vibration will be a scalar
multiple of a mode shape

g Given “arbitrary” initial conditions, the resulting


vibration will be a
ü Superposition of mode shapes
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Modal Analysis
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Determines the vibration characteristics (natural


frequencies and mode shapes) of a structural
components

g Natural frequencies and mode shapes are a


starting point for a transient or harmonic analysis
ü If using the mode superposition method

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Mode Shape of a Thin Plate (240 Hz)
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Mode Extraction Methods
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Subspace
g Block Lanczos
g PowerDynamics

g Reduced

g Unsymmetric

g Damped and QR damped (Include damping)


Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Steps in Modal Analysis
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS
g Build the model
ü Same as for static analysis
ü Use top-down or bottom-up techniques
g Apply loads and obtain solution
üOnly valid loads are zero-value displacement
constraints
ü Other loads can be specified but are ignored
g Expand the modes and review results
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
In-Class Exercise
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

A = 3 in 2 E = 30E6 psi
IZZ = 450 in 4  lb   s 
2
ρ = 8.031E − 4  3   
H = 5 in  in   in 

360 inches
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
In-Class Exercise
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Set element type to BEAM3

gSet the appropriate real constants and material


constants

gCreate Keypoints at the start and end of the


beam and a Line between them

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Mesh the Line and Apply B.C.s
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Set the meshing size control of the line to 5

g Fix the Keypoint at the right end of the beam

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Set Solution Options
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Change the analysis type to Modal


ü Solution > Analysis Type > New Analysis
ü <Modal>

g Set the analysis options


ü Solution > Analysis Options
ü Extract 10 mode <OK>
ü Enter <1500> for the ending frequency
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Set Solution Options
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g At this point, you have told ANSYS to find a


particular quantity of modes and to look within a
particular frequency range. If ANSYS finds that
quantity before it finishes the frequency range, it
will stop the search. If ANSYS does not find that
quantity before finishing the frequency range,
then it will stop the search.

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Set Solution Options
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Solve the load set

gANSYS generates a substep result for each


natural frequency and mode shape

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Postprocessing
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g List results summary


üGeneral Postproc > List Results > Results
Summary
g Read results for a substep
ü General Postproc > Read Results > First Set
ü Plot deformed geometry
ü General Postproc > Read Results > Next Set
ü Plot deformed geometry
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Theoretical Modal Analysis

David Herrin, Ph.D.


University of Kentucky
Structural Vibration at a Single DOF
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g At a single degree of freedom

u = φ cos(ωt )
u = displacement of a nodal DOF
φ = amplitude

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Structural Vibration for the Entire Structure
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

{u} = {φ}cos(ωt )

{u} = Vector of nodal displacements


{φ} = vector of amplitudes for each DOF

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Mode Shapes
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g The vector of amplitudes is a mode shape


φ 5 φ6
φ3 φ 4 φ7
φ2 φ8

gUse subscript i to differentiate mode shapes


and natural frequencies

{u} = {φ}i cos(ωit )


Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Appropriate Initial Conditions
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g If the I.C.s are a scalar (a) multiple of a specific


mode shape then the structure will vibrate in the
corresponding mode and natural frequency

ICs = a{φ }i

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Determining Natural Frequencies
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Consider a multi DOF system

[M ]{u&&}+ [K ]{u} = {0}


g Note that the system is
ü Undamped
ü Not excited by any external forces

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Modal Analysis
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

gIf the system vibrates according to a particular


mode shape and frequency

{u} = {φ}i cos(ωit )


{φ}i = mode shape i
ωi = natural frequency i

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Modal Analysis
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g First derivative (Velocity)

{u&} = −ω i {φ }i sin (ω i t )
g Second derivative (Acceleration)

{u} = −ωi {φ}i cos ( ωit )


&& 2

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Modal Analysis
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Plug velocity and acceleration into the equation


of motion

( − [ M ] ω + [ K ]) {φ} = {0}
2
i i

g Two possible solutions

{φ}i = {0}
det ( − [ M ] ω + [ K ]) = 0
2
i
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
The Eigen Problem
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

det ( − [ M ] ω + [ K ]) = 0
2
i

g The Eigen Problem


[A]{x} = λ[I ]{x}
g Eigenvalue λ

g Eigenvector { x}
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Modal Analysis – An Eigen Problem
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

( − [ M ] ω + [ K ]) {φ} = [0]
2
i

[ K ]{φ} = ω [ M ]{φ}
2
i

[M ] [K ]{φ} = ω [I ]{φ}
−1 2
i

g Natural frequencies are eigenvalues ω 2


i

g The mode shapes are eigenvectors {φ}


Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Modal Analysis – An Eigen Problem
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

[M ] [K ]{φ} = ω [I ]{φ}
−1 2
i

[A]{x} = λ[I ]{x}


g Solving the eigen problem

([ A] − λ [ I ]) { x} = 0
det ([ A] − λ [ I ] ) = 0

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Example Eigen Problem
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

 2 3   x1   x1 
3 2  x  = λi  x 
  2  2

 2 3 1 0 
det    − λi   =0
 3 2 0 1 

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Find Eigenvalues
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

 2 − λ 3 
det    =0
 3 2 − λ 
( 2 − λ )( 2 − λ ) − 9 = λ − 4λ − 5
2

g Eigenvalues
λ1 = −1
λ2 = 5
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
For Eigenvector 1
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

λ1 = −1

 2 3 1 0    x1  0 
  − ( −1)     =  
 3 2 0 1    x2 1 0 

  2 + 1 3    x1  0
    =  
 3 2 + 1   x2 1 0

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
For Eigenvector 1
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

 3 3   x1  0 
    =  
 3 3   x2 1 0 
x2 = − x1
g x1 can be any value

 x1   1   .7071 
  = = 
 x2 1 −1  −.7071
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
For Eigenvector 2
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

λ2 = 5

 2 3 1 0   x1  0
  − ( 5)     =  
 3 2  0 1   x2 2 0

 2 − 5 3    x1  0
    =  
 3 2 − 5   x2 2 0

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
For Eigenvector 2
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

  −3 3    x1  0
    =  
  3 −3   x2 2 0
x2 = x1
g x2 can be any value

 x1  1 .7071
  = = 
 x2 2 1 .7071
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Example
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS
M 1 = 5 kg x1 x2
M 2 = 10 kg
K1 K2
K1 = 800 N/m M1 M2
K 2 = 400 N/m

g Equations of motions
x1 + K1 x1 − K1 x2 = 0
M1 &&
x2 + K 2 x2 + K1 x2 − K1 x1 = 0
M 2 &&
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Matrix Form
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

 M1 0   x&&1   K1 − K1   x1  0
 0   +    = 
 x 2   − K1 K 1 + K 2   x 2   0 
M 2   &&

x1   800 −800   x1  0 
5 0   &&
0 10   && +   =  
   x2   −800 1200   x2  0 

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Set Up Eigen Problem
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

[ M ] [ K ]{φ} = ω {φ}
−1 2
i

160 −160 
[M ] [ K ] = −80 120 
−1

 
 160 −160 1 0  
det    −λ  =0
  −80 120  0 1  
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Solve Eigen Problem
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS
 160 − λ −160  
det    =0
  −80 120 − λ  
ω1 = λ1 = 5.011 rad/s  φ1  0.7645 
  = 
f =
5.011
= .7975 Hz φ2 1 0.6446

1

ω2 = λ 2 = 15.965 rad/s  φ1  −0.8601


  = 
φ2 1  0.5101 
15.965
f2 = = 2.5409 Hz

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Weighted Orthogonality
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

T
 φ1   φ1 
  [M ]  = 0
φ 2 1 φ 2  2

T
 φ1   φ1 
  [K ]  = 0
φ 2 1 φ 2  2

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Modal Vector Scaling
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Unity Modal Mass


T
 φ1   φ1 
  [M ]  = 1
φ 2 1 φ 2 1

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Modal Vector Scaling
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Unity Modal Mass


T
.7645 X  5 0  .7645 X 
      =1
.6446 X 1 0 10 .6446 X 1
X = .376
 φ1  .287 
  = 
φ 2 1 .242

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Mode 1
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

0.7645 0.6446

K1 K2
M1 M2

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Mode 2
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

-0.8601 0.5101

K1 K2
M1 M2

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Harmonic Response using ANSYS

David Herrin, Ph.D.


University of Kentucky
Harmonic Response Analysis
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Solves the time-dependent equations of motion


for linear structures undergoing steady-state
vibration
g All loads and displacements vary sinusoidally at
the same frequency
Fi = F sin(ωt + φ1 )
Fj = F sin(ωt + φ2 )
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Harmonic Response Analysis
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Analyses can generate plots of displacement


amplitudes at given points in the structure as a
function of forcing frequency

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
In-Class Exercise
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

A = 3 in 2 E = 30E6 psi
IZZ = 450 in 4  lb   s 
2
ρ = 8.031E − 4  3   
H = 5 in  in   in 

360 inches
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
In-Class Exercise
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Set element type to BEAM3

gSet the appropriate real constants and material


constants

gCreate Keypoints at the start and end of the


beam and a Line between them

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Mesh the Line and Apply B.C.s
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Set the meshing size control of the line to 5

g Fix the Keypoint at the right end of the beam

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Set Solution Options
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Change the analysis type to Modal


ü Solution > Analysis Type > New Analysis
ü <Modal>

g Set the analysis options


ü Solution > Analysis Options
ü Extract 10 mode <OK>
ü Enter <1500> for the ending frequency
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Set Solution Options
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g At this point, you have told ANSYS to find a


particular quantity of modes and to look within a
particular frequency range. If ANSYS finds that
quantity before it finishes the frequency range, it
will stop the search. If ANSYS does not find that
quantity before finishing the frequency range,
then it will stop the search.

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Set Solution Options
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Solve the load set

gANSYS generates a substep result for each


natural frequency and mode shape

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Postprocessing
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g List results summary


üGeneral Postproc > List Results > Results
Summary
g Read results for a substep
ü General Postproc > Read Results > First Set
ü Plot deformed geometry
ü General Postproc > Read Results > Next Set
ü Plot deformed geometry
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Forced Response
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Apply a 1.0 N load at the left end of the beam

g New Analysis > Harmonic

g Set the Analysis Options


ü Set the solution method to “Full”
üSet the DOF printout format to “Amplitude
and phase” <OK>
ü Set the tolerance to 1e-8 <OK>
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-
University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Forced Response
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Set the frequency substeps


ü Solution > Load Step Opts – Time Frequency
> Freq and Substeps
üSet the Harmonic Frequency Range to
between 0 and 50 Hz
ü Set the number of substeps to 100
ü Set to Stepped

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Forced Response
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Set the damping


ü Solution > Load Step Opts – Time Frequency
> Damping
ü Set the Constant Damping Ratio to 0.01

g Solve the model

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design
Forced Response
Modal/Harmonic Analysis Using ANSYS

g Enter time history postprocessor

g Define a variable for UY at the leftmost node

g List and graph the variable

gAdd a vertical truss member at the center of the


beam having an area of 10.

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering ME 599/699 Vibro-


University of Kentucky Acoustic Design

S-ar putea să vă placă și