Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
logo here
organization
name here
METHODOLOGY
This document includes content based on material from the State of Minnesota OET PMO website.
Put your Put your Project Management Methodology
logo here Rev. 3.0, 4/15/2008
organization
name here
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................4
Overview...............................................................................................................................................4
Purpose.................................................................................................................................................4
Organization..........................................................................................................................................4
Initiation Phase.............................................................................................................................74
Planning Phase.............................................................................................................................74
Managing Phase...........................................................................................................................74
Closeout Phase.............................................................................................................................74
3. Project Sponsor...............................................................................................................................74
General Responsibilities...............................................................................................................75
Initiation Phase.............................................................................................................................75
Planning Phase.............................................................................................................................75
Managing Phase...........................................................................................................................75
Closeout Phase.............................................................................................................................75
4. Business Process Owner................................................................................................................76
General Responsibilities...............................................................................................................76
Initiation Phase.............................................................................................................................76
Planning Phase, Managing Phase................................................................................................76
Closeout Phase.............................................................................................................................76
5. Program Manager...........................................................................................................................76
General Responsibilities...............................................................................................................77
6. Initiating Project Manager................................................................................................................77
Initiation Phase.............................................................................................................................77
7. Project Manager..............................................................................................................................77
General Responsibilities...............................................................................................................77
Initiation Phase.............................................................................................................................78
Planning Phase.............................................................................................................................78
Managing Phase...........................................................................................................................78
Closeout Phase.............................................................................................................................78
8. Project Team...................................................................................................................................79
General Functions.........................................................................................................................79
Initiation Phase.............................................................................................................................79
Planning Phase.............................................................................................................................79
Managing Phase...........................................................................................................................80
Closeout Phase.............................................................................................................................80
INTRODUCTION
Overview
<ORGANIZATION> has established a Project Management Office (PMO) as a means of achieving a
greater degree of success in its technology projects. As part of its Charter, the PMO is charged with
creating and maintaining a documented Project Management Methodology for use in all technology
projects. This methodology is designed to meet the needs of all segments of the organization as they
engage in technical project work. It serves as a guide to the organization as it selects its projects, to
project teams as they plan the work, to management as they supply the required oversight, and to
Sponsors and Customers as they collaborate in the design and delivery of new business systems. This
methodology is designed to be consistent with the Project Management Institute’s (PMI) A Guide to
Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). It should apply equally well to and meet the
requirements of projects large and small. Various templates are available to support this methodology;
they are referenced throughout this document.
Purpose
This document describes in detail the process that <ORGANIZATION> intends to use during the
initiating, planning, managing (controlling and executing), and closing stages of technology projects. The
reader will find a detailed description of the methodology, as well as references to templates and other
documents that are used in support of the methodology.
In defining this methodology, the PMO hopes to reach the following goals:
• Provide a common point of reference and a common vocabulary for talking and writing about the
practice of project management for technology projects within <ORGANIZATION>.
• Increase the awareness and professionalism of good Project Management Practice by those charged
with the responsibilities defined in the methodology.
• Define the roles of the Executive Committee, Sponsor, Project Manager, Stakeholders, Technical and
Business Leads and other team members and obtain consensus within the organization about their
importance as Critical Success Factors (CSF).
• Create the basis for a collaborative environment where everyone engaged in technical project work
understands what is required of them and why those requirements are key factors for improving
project results.
Organization
Each Project Phase section of the document is organized as follows:
• Overview/description
• Critical Success Factors
• Activities
• Action Plan Checklist (table)
• Deliverables
We are surrounded by people who are highly creative and energized. These individuals deal with issues
of varying types and magnitude on a daily basis, and they can be very imaginative in conceiving of
solutions to the problems they face. They may present these solutions as potential projects.
Organizations may discover the need or benefit in pursuing a new initiative. This may be due to an
opening in the marketplace, the need for operational maintenance or the opportunity to create a strategic
advantage. The Information Technology (IT) organization may be called upon to leverage the power of
technology for the benefit of the organization through execution of a technology project.
Executive management may declare business objectives that the organization must meet, along with
strategies for reaching them. Many elements of an organization, both business and technical, may fine a
role in carrying out these strategies, and the primary means of doing so is through execution of projects..
Finally, organizations may be subjected to the demands of outside agencies. For example, a local
government may be on constant watch for new state legislation that can affect the way it does business.
Or a division of a large company may find it beneficial to adopt a new program that is sponsored by its
corporate headquarters. In each case, the organization in question may have to shuffle priorities and
resources to handle new projects, and the organization’s project management staff will have to find a way
to make it all happen.
As we can see, projects may come about for a variety of reasons and they may present themselves at any
time. Generally, organizations find that there are many more ideas and demands for technology projects
than there are people and dollars to support them. Projects differ in the degree of benefit that they can
bring to the organization, and the cost can vary widely. Management generally recognizes that great care
must be taken in deciding which projects to support, and which to defer. Therefore, most organizations
eventually discover that they need a process that will allow them to choose among the project candidates.
This project selection process is carried out during Initiation. The Initiation Process is that time in the
lifecycle of a project when the project idea is defined, evaluated, authorized and then funded by an
executive committee, usually through a Governance Body. The project management profession has
learned that this process works best when the mission, justification, significant deliverables, risks,
estimated cost and resource requirements and other information about the project are documented and
reviewed in a formal manner. Formal project review and approval should take place at a phase gate
review (Project Commit) at the end of Initiation.. This process gives the Governance Body, the Sponsor
and other stakeholders an opportunity to validate the projects potential benefits and costs.
There are several benefits to conducting Project Initiation within the context of a formal governance
process:
• The Initiation process guides the project team as they determine and articulate those key aspects
of a proposed project that will help in the decision process.
• Careful development of Initiation’s key deliverable, the Project Charter, helps to ensure that
the organization chooses the best of its project candidates, and that the technology projects
chosen will be successful.
• Development of the Project Charter also promotes an early collaboration between the Sponsor,
the Client(s) and the project team. Early establishment of a good rapport among these players
can help ensure a cooperative spirit later in the project.
• A well-written Project Charter can help everyone involved understand and come to agreement on
exactly what is being proposed, the benefits that can be expected, the technical approach to be
taken and how the project’s deliverables will fit into ongoing operations.
• Formal review and approval of the project by a Governance Body lets everyone know that the
project in question is of high quality and must be fully supported by everyone involved.
The Initiation Process is successful when it leads the organization to select the most pressing business
issues for resolution, choose effective technological approaches to resolve them, and ensures that the
organization makes a good investment that is consistent with its long-term strategies.
The amount of effort that goes into Project Initiation will depend in some part on the size, complexity
and risk of the proposed project. We generally will need to know more about big projects that represent
substantial investment than about small ones. The total effort required to complete the Initiation Phase
may range from hours to weeks. So that effort is not wasted, it is essential to keep focus on the purpose
of initiation: select those projects that give the biggest bang for the buck. For this reason, it is useful to
give formal guidance to project teams as to how much effort makes sense for projects of a given size.
This will help them to stay focused and provide the necessary information, rather than just hand in a lot
of extraneous paperwork.
Activities
The following is a list of key activities necessary for:
• Development of a Project Charter
• Preparation for formal presentation to the Governance Body at the Project Commit phase gate
review.
Manager) is responsible for defining the project purpose, establishing the deliverables and acceptance
criteria, gathering strategic and background information, determining high-level planning data and
developing estimated budgets and schedules for the life of the project. The Initiating Project Manager
will coordinate resources and activities to complete the necessary activities in order to develop the
Project Charter and any other materials required for project approval. Since it generally takes more than
one person to fully develop a Project Charter, a team of individuals may also be required to do the
research, generate the estimates and perform other work that may be necessary. This team may or may
not carry over to actually conduct of the project if it is approved. The Project Manager eventually will
join the Project Sponsor in presenting the project to the Governance Body for approval.
The Project Sponsor carries great responsibility. He or she is responsible for championing the project,
obtaining budgets, accepting responsibility for problems escalated from the project team, and signing off
documents such as the project charter. The Project Sponsor has the authority to define project goals,
secure resources, and resolve organizational and priority conflicts. It has been shown, but may not be
generally recognized, that lack of effective project sponsorship can be a major contributor to project
failure. Conversely, an appropriately placed and fully engaged Project Sponsor can bring a difficult
project to successful conclusion. Assumptions that a formal Project Sponsor is not needed (or for
political reasons can be avoided) are misplaced. Steering committees are no substitute. A powerful but
uninvolved Project Sponsor is no help. Even big-budget and highly visible projects require a formal
Project Sponsor. The role of the Sponsor is fully described in the Sponsor Brochure.
Discussion of the need/opportunity should be stated in business terms and should provide an
understanding of:
This information allows an organization to determine how much of its resources (dollars, people’s time)
to put into the project. The decision can be made based on how well the project should meet the business
need or take advantage of the opportunity.
organization can measure how well the proposed solution addresses the business need or
opportunity.
Having established the business objectives, it is then necessary to determine the benefits. For
example, determine whether the proposed solution will reduce or avoid costs, enhance revenues,
improve timeliness or service quality, etc. If possible, quantify operational improvements by
translating them into reduced costs. For example, a business objective might be to “Reduce the
average amount of overtime worked by 100 hours per month, thereby saving $X per year while
still meeting terms of the Service Level Agreement. Attain this result within 6 months.”
Finally, determine in a general way what metrics will be used to measure business benefits once
the project has been completed. List these metrics and indicate who will be responsible for
taking measurements over what period of time, and who will be the recipient of reports related
to them.
Business Requirements may be documented in more detail in a Business Requirements Document.
• Project Scope is a statement of the work required to create and implement the product or
service as well as the work required to manage the project.
Project scope is documented at a high level in the Project Charter. It should include a discussion
of the proposed solution and the business processes that will be used with the solution, as well as
a description of their characteristics. Also describe the general approach that will be taken to
produce the proposed solution, and how the work will be planned and managed.
The Scope section of a Project Charter is generally written at a fairly high level. Nonetheless, the
level of detail in this section must be sufficient to provide a basis for detailed scope and solution
development in the Scope Statement, developed in the Planning phase. If Scope in the Charter is
done well, Scope as developed in the Scope Statement will more completely describe the
product of the project without substantially increasing the estimate of work required to create it.
If it is not possible to establish boundaries on scope during project Initiation, then there must at
least be some decision made about how to handle changes to scope later in the project.
Note: “Scope creep” – adding work without corresponding updates to cost, schedule and
quality – may render original plans unachievable. Therefore, initial clarification of scope,
and adherence to the plan throughout the project, are of the utmost importance.
new time tracking system” has no value in and of itself. That goal only brings value to the
organization when it leads to accomplishment of the Business objective (e.g. “Reduce costs and
improve productivity through improved resource management”).
Project objectives are used to establish project performance goals – planned levels of
accomplishment stated as measurable objectives that can be compared to actual results.
Performance measures should be derived for each goal. These measures can be quantified to see
if the project is meeting its objectives.
Note that it may not be possible to determine that the project actually provided the intended
business value until some time (days, months or even years) after Project Close. By this time the
project team will no longer exist. For this reason, it is essential that the organization carefully
define at the start of every project how it will measure those impacts and who will be responsible
for doing this and reporting on it. Organizations must conduct these measures if they are ever to
know if they actually obtained the benefits that were expected from their investment in the
project.
Project objectives can be described in two ways:
Hard Objectives – Relate to the time, cost and operational objectives (Scope) of the
product or service. Was the project on time? Within budget? Did it deliver its full Scope?
Soft Objectives – Relate more to how the objectives are achieved. These may include
attitude, behavior, expectations and communications. Is the Customer happy? Is the
project team proud of its work? Is management proud of the project team?
Focus on the full set of project objectives, hard and soft, can lead to a more complete project
success. Focus only on hard objectives can lead to a situation where the project is delivered on
time and within budget, but the customer never used the product.
As with Business objectives, Project objectives are defined best if they are SMART (i.e.
Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results Oriented and Time Limited).
Project objectives fully define success for the given project. They are communicated in the
Project Charter so that all Stakeholders understand what project success will be.
.
Action Plan Checklist - Define Project Objectives
Define project objectives (hard and soft) as they relate to business objectives
Project objectives are SMART
All stakeholders understand up front what success will be for this project
CSF Project Objectives are documented in the Project Charter
any point in the project, the Governance Body may choose to continue funding, suspend funding
until a more propitious time or cancel the project altogether.
For this reason, it is essential that the Project Manager and executives associated with the project
(e.g. the Project Sponsor) manage the project with Gate Reviews continually in mind. Each
Gate Review poses its own set of questions, and the project must be well positioned to answer
those questions if it is to continue onto the next phase. A graphical representation of PLC
Phases and their associated Gate Reviews is shown here:
Figure 1. Project Life Cycle - Project Life Cycle phases are in the arrows and gate reviews are in
the rectangles.
The PLC is a natural extension of the usual project phases as discussed in the PMBOK©. The
relationship between the primary project phases and PLC phases are shown in this table:
Table 1: Relationship between standard Project Phases and Project Life Cycle
All projects that require significant investment should be managed through the PLC. Doing so
ensures that major projects receive the benefit of continual executive oversight.
While the Initiation Phase has many objectives, from a governance standpoint the primary
purpose of the Initiation Phase is to:
Identify business needs and project objectives
Assess efforts and resources required to achieve objectives
Identify key stakeholders
With sufficient preparation and a project that is a good fit, the project team should receive
approval from the Governance Body to proceed into the Analysis Phase. In order for this to
occur, project representatives must have compelling answers to key questions at the Project
Commit review (see Initiation Deliverables below).
A Project Commit template is available to assist project teams prepare for this presentation.
In the case of Information Technology projects, there is the additional requirement that they
align with Technical Service’s and the organization’s enterprise architecture and fit in with the
current business and technical environment. The project team must acquire and review all
relevant Technical Services and organization documents, confer with appropriate IT staff and be
able to demonstrate that their project is in alignment. These documents might include:
• Organization-wide strategic plan
• Department strategic plan
• Organization -wide enterprise architecture
• Department architecture
• Organization >-wide applications portfolio
• Department applications portfolio
• Organization -wide architecture (software and/or hardware)
• Current business and technical environment
• Organization mandates.
Action Plan Checklist - Ensure Alignment with Strategic Project Life Cycle
Obtain and review all relevant strategic plans
Review Technical Services-wide and organization enterprise architecture
Review current business and technical environment
Review project to ensure alignment with strategic direction and architecture
Identify business needs and project objectives
Assess efforts and resources required to achieve objectives
Identify key stakeholders
Establish a compelling business case that demonstrates creation of business value, clear feasibility, acceptable risk
and alignment with strategy
Present project and gain approval at a Project Commit review
Action Plan Checklist - Ensure Alignment with Strategic Project Life Cycle
CSF Governance Body gives Project Commit approval to the project
To ensure project success, the project team needs to identify key stakeholders early in the project. It is
essential to determine their needs and expectations, and to manage and influence those expectations over
the course of the project. Stakeholders who are not sympathetic to the goals of the project must be either
made into supporters or at least brought to a place of neutrality.
If the project will have an impact on the business processes, work habits or culture of the organization,
steps should be taken during Initiation to prepare for the process of Organizational Change
Management.
A risk is usually regarded as any unplanned factor that may potentially interfere with successful
completion of the project. A risk is not an issue. An issue is something you face now; a risk is the
recognition that a problem might occur. By recognizing potential problems, the project team can plan in
advance on how to deal with these factors.
It is also possible to look at a positive side of risk. A risk may be seen as a potentially useful outcome
that occurs because of some unplanned event. In this case, the project team can attempt to maximize the
potential of these positive risk event should they occur.
An understanding of Risk is essential in the Project Portfolio Management Process. A project with
excellent potential for ROI may be turned down if the risks are so high that the ROI might never be
realized. Use the Risk Assessment for Project Charter tool to assess risk.
Identify all products and services that may require procurement during the project
CSF Products and services that may require procurement are documented in the Project Charter
When comparing alternative approaches during project Initiation, it is useful to compare product lifecycle
costs rather than just project implementation costs. This may help the organization identify the
alternative that truly provides the greatest value over its lifetime.
Cost / Benefit
For the Project Charter, estimate the one-time development / acquisition / implementation costs
(including contracted staff, hardware, middleware, licenses, leases, etc.), and then separately total the
costs that will follow the project:
• maintenance
• enhancements
• one-time upgrades
• ongoing operations
Next, determine the anticipated benefits of the project including tangible and intangible operational
benefits, cost savings, cost avoidance and other benefits. Use these estimates of cost and benefit to
determine the anticipated cost savings / revenue enhancement / other benefit that will result from the
project.
With respect to the project itself, it may be necessary to explain how the project will be funded. This
process varies greatly from one organization to the next, but it is fairly common to provide a description
of funds required by fiscal year, by funding organization, and by phase of project. If the project is to be
funded from multiple sources, indicate the percentage from each source. Also indicate whether funds
have been budgeted for this purpose. If this project will require funding beyond that already provided to
the organization, supply the necessary details.
It is also useful to determine in advance who (which funding source) will underwrite continuing costs
once the project is completed. It is not uncommon for a business unit to be unaware of the “true” cost of
their proposed initiative.
Schedule
The Initiation phase of most projects is a time of great uncertainty. While there may be general
agreement on the scope of the project, specifics of implementation may not be available. For this reason,
it may not be possible to provide anything more than a high level schedule, and even then only with
fairly large confidence limits (e.g. +/- 50% or more). If this is the case, it is important for the project
team to make this clear in the project Charter.
With that in mind, it is nonetheless necessary in most cases to identify at least the high-level tasks of the
project and then guestimate a schedule. For example, tasks could include the typical steps of the project
life-cycle (e.g. gather requirements, create specifications, develop a test plan), along with tasks specific to
the project at hand (e.g. procurement, conversion, training for end-users, training for technical staff, post-
implementation support, etc.).
Schedule information can include the duration of critical tasks, PLC Gate Reviews and milestones.
Milestones should be products or major events that may be readily identified as completed or not
completed on a specified due date. Most projects are planned in PM phases (e.g. Initiation, Planning,
etc.). Define the phases in the schedule and make clear the tangible output of each phase. If project
phases are not planned, be very clear why this is so.
For Information Technology software projects, when planning for staged project implementation (e.g.
implement a new general ledger first, then purchase and roll out accounts payable and payroll modules in
subsequent stages), use only as many SDLC stages as provide improved management control over the
program as a whole. There should be identifiable deliverables and success criteria for each stage.
Many late or over-budget projects deemed “failures” are actually only estimating failures. This can
happen when estimates based on inadequate data (usually the case during Initiation) are then taken by
management as “final”. To prevent this from occurring, project teams are encouraged to re-estimate at the
end of each major project phase when more information is available and confidence in the estimates is
better. These updated estimates are brought to the Gate Reviews where the project’s cost/benefit position
can be re-evaluated.
Cost and time tracking are not as useful when there is little confidence in cost and time estimates. This is
true because when an estimate is provided with a +/- 35% confidence limit, variances up to that amount
will seem a minor concern. Management insistence that unreasonable cost and time targets be met only
results in a dispirited project team, unhappy customers and another “project failure”.
CSF The Project Phase Exit Plan is used to ensure that the project is ready before it moves forward to each project
phase
1. Project Charter
The Project Charter is a business proposal. It is a statement by the group who develops it that they have
a great idea that will help the organization and here is how we will do it, what it will cost and how long it
will take to do. If the project Sponsor and all parties who will be involved in the project (e.g. peer
business groups, Information Technology staff, Financial Officer, Technical Security Officer) accept it,
information from the Project Charter is presented to the Governance Body for review and approval.
Project Charters can appear in many forms depending on the size, complexity, importance and level of
risk of the project. Indeed, how an organization defines “project” will determine if there is any written
Project Charter at all. In some organizations, proposals of less than $100,000 are not considered formal
projects. In others, any work that takes more than 40 hours is considered a project. Within the
definitions used in this organization,
• For small, less complex, less critical projects, a single page Project Definition is sufficient.
• Somewhat larger but not complex projects require a Project Charter Lite
• More costly, more complex, and critical (high impact) projects require a formal Project Charter
along with supporting documents (e.g. Risk Assessment, Cost Estimater, Cost/Benefit Analysis).
Specific documentation and approval requirements are detailed in the Project Sizing and Approvals
document. This document details:
• Types of projects and distinguishing criteria (e.g. cost, hours of labor required)
• Documents required, approval steps and other information for each size of project.
2. Project Commit
As mentioned above, governance considerations run in parallel with Initiation project work. But as in the
case of the Project Charter, a full PLC is not required for every project. Full governance oversight on
smaller projects would benefit them little and make them too costly. For small projects, transition from
one project phase to the next is governed by the Project Phase Exit Plan. The Project Manager uses this
planning tool both to document that the project is ready to move forward to the Planning phase, and to
obtain approval for this transition from the Project Sponsor.
Projects that must use the PLC also use the Project Phase Exit Plan, but have in addition Project Commit
approval as another key deliverable of Initiation. It is only with approval of the Governance Body that
these projects can proceed into the Planning phase. A Project Commit Template is available to guide the
Project Manager in preparing the Project Commit presentation. During Project Commit, the Governance
Body typically will focus on the following questions:
When the project obtains Project Commit approval, the Initiation Phase is ended and Planning begins.
During Planning, the project team, along with additional staff, will begin the work of refining the Scope
Statement and other project planning documents. From the governance view, the project enters the
Analysis phase and begins to prepare for the next Gate Review, Plan Commit.
Without planning, a project’s success will be difficult, if not impossible. Team members will have
limited understanding of expectations; activities may not be properly defined; and resource requirements
may not be completely understood. Even if the project is finished, the conditions for success may not
have been defined. Project Planning identifies several specialized areas of concentration for determining
the needs for a project. Planning will involve identifying and documenting scope, tasks, schedules, risk,
quality and staffing needs. The identification process should continue until as many of the areas as
possible of the chartered project have been addressed.
Inadequate and incomplete Project Planning is the downfall of many high-profile, important projects. An
adequate planning process and Project Plan will ensure that resources and team members will be
identified so that the project will be successful.
The Project Planning phase overlaps two PLC phases; Analysis and Design. Project Management
activities during the PLC Analysis Phase include:
More clearly define project scope
Develop a comprehensive project plan that includes more precise cost and schedule estimates
Establish an effective project team
Fully plan for project risks
Reaffirm that the project ROI relative to risk is attractive
Obtain approval from the Governance Body at an Plan Commit review
When a project is finished, if the definition for success is not well defined, success may go unrecognized.
For this reason it is important that all stakeholders understand what the criteria for success are. By
focusing on several specialized areas (e.g. scope, schedule, budget, risk) the project team is able to plan
how to carry out the project in order to meet success criteria agreed to during the Initiation Phase. The
planning process should continue until all core aspects of the project have been addressed. An adequate
planning process and Project Plan will ensure that resources and team members will be identified so that
the project will be successful.
Completion of these steps and others is necessary to develop the Project Plan. Typically, several
iterations of the planning process are performed before a plan is actually completed.
Note that this emphasis on project planning does not preclude the use of an iterative approach to project
work. There are some types of projects (e.g. commercial web sites) where a strict waterfall approach to
project planning almost always fails. However, even in these cases there are certain areas of planning
that cannot be ignored. To be effective, an iterative approach requires that:
The final project goal is clear and agreed upon (even if details of the design and implementation
are not)
The right team is in place
Risk relative to ROI is understood
Budget and schedule parameters are defined (e.g. we will build the best web site possible for “x”
amount of money and in “x” amount of time)
The impact of organizational change is planned for
explained, or the project manager should receive sufficient support to make up for any
deficiencies (e.g. be supplied with a mentor).
Ensure that key resources are available as required by the Project Plan
Ensure that major functional deliverables will arrive in six-month to 12-month intervals.
Plan for the impact of organizational change
Understand and plan for project risk
Obtain approval from the Governance Body at an PLC reviews
The remainder of this part of the Guide describes Project Management activities required to complete the
Planning Phase of the project. It is divided into two sections that correspond to the two PLC phases,
Analysis and Design
Provide day-to-day decision-making on critical project issues as they pertain to project scope,
schedule, budget, methodology and resources
Provide direction, leadership and support to Project Team members in a professional manner at
project, functional and task levels
Ensure project documentation is complete and communicated (e.g., scope statement, project
schedule, project budget, quality plan, requirements, testing, meeting minutes and others)
Identify funding sources and facilitate the prioritization of project requirements
Manage the planning and control of project activities and resources
Develop and manage project contracts with vendors
Report project components status and issues to the Project Sponsor and the Governance Body
Use, develop and improve upon the project management methodology
Provide teams with advice and input on tasks throughout the project, including documentation,
creation of plans, schedules and reports
Resolve conflicts within the project between resources, schedules, etc.
Influence stakeholders and team members in order to get buy-in on decisions that will lead to the
success of the project
Delegate responsibility to team members.
Delegating responsibility to team members.
Taking these responsibilities into account, it is easy to see that a Project Manager should not necessarily
be selected from a department based strictly on tenure or function, but rather based on a combination of
other strengths. A Project Manager should be selected based on the following skills and experience:
Project Managers who are selected to lead a project but who were not involved in the Initiation phase (for
whatever reason) should be reminded that it is critical to review the Project Initiation phase
documentation. These documents are the agreed-upon foundation for which the project was created and
the catalyst for the creation of the Project Plan.
Scope is documented in an addendum to the Project Charter, the Project Charter Deliverables document.
Before any project or service is ordered, it is necessary to develop Procurement strategy. Procurement
was described at a high level in the Project Charter. During Planning, final decisions are made about
what will be purchased, when and from which vendors. Details of this strategy are entered into the
Procurement Plan document. The Procurement Strategy deals with the following:
What to Procure
How will the procured product serve the needs of the project and the organization as a whole?
Does the product or something similar already exist somewhere else within the organization?
Is there a service provider available in the marketplace for this product?
Does the organization have the means (staff, money, contract, etc.) to produce or to acquire the
product?
When to Procure
should be taken. These people review the needs and the costs and deliver their opinion for
consideration in the procurement decision.
Will there be need beyond the immediate project for this product?
How much of the budget has been allocated for this product?
Is the need for the product clearly defined enough for the department to know exactly how much
of the product will be needed?
Develop framework for contract/vendor administration.
Action Plan Checklist - Determine Procurement and Sourcing Strategy
Determine what to procure
Determine when to procure
Determine how to procure
Determine how much to procure
Develop a framework for management of the contract/vendor
CSF The Procurement Strategy is a component of the Project Plan. Details can be found in the Procurement Plan
document.
Project Phasing
All projects large enough to fall under PLC requirements are required to use the Project Management and
Project Governance (PLC) phases described in this Guide. The PLC phases should provide sufficient
guidance to support both project management and project governance needs for any project. Smaller
projects generally benefit from a phased PMI approach, but in those cases the PLC will not be applied
due to high overhead cost.
Note that project teams may wish to use a third layer of phase granularity in software development
projects, i.e. the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Specifics of an SDLC may vary depending
on the type and size of project, but all will focus specifically on the flow of technical work in those
projects. There are no predefined touch points between the phases described in this Guide and those
commonly found in an SDLC.
A WBS is neither a schedule nor an organizational representation of the project. Instead, it is a definition
of what is to be delivered. Once the scope is clearly understood, the Project Manager must determine
who will deliver it and how it will be delivered. This is the one planning tool that must be used to ensure
project success on any size project.
Identify Activities and Activity Sequences Based On Project Scope and Deliverables
The WBS reflects activities associated with overall project management, requirements, design,
implementation, transition management, testing, training, installation, maintenance and every other
aspect of the project. The Project Manager is responsible for defining all top-level tasks associated with a
project and then further decomposing them as planning continues.
WBS tasks are developed by determining what tasks need to be done to accomplish the project objective.
The choice of WBS structure is subjective and reflects the preferences and judgment of the Project
Manager. As levels of the WBS become lower, the scope, complexity and cost of each subtask become
smaller and more accurate. The lowest-level tasks, or work packages, are independent, manageable units
that are planned, budgeted, scheduled, resourced and controlled individually.
One of the most important parts of the Project Planning process is the definition of activities that will be
undertaken as part of the project. Activity sequencing involves dividing the project into smaller, more-
manageable components (activities) and then specifying the order of completion. Much of this has
already been done within the process of creating the WBS. No matter how the WBS has been broken
down, by the time the Project Manager gets to the activity level, the activities should represent the same
level of effort or duration.
There is no simple formula to define how detailed a work breakdown needs to be. There are, however,
some helpful guidelines for completion:
Break down the work until accurate estimates of cost and resources needed to perform the task
are provided.
Ensure that clearly defined starting and ending events are identified for the task. These may be
the production of a deliverable or the occurrence of an event.
Verify that the lowest-level tasks can be performed within a reasonable period of time. Each
project must define “reasonable.” If the time period to complete a task is too long, an accurate
project status during the Design and Execution phases may not be possible. An industry-standard
rule of thumb is to make work packages that can be completed within an elapsed time of two
weeks (80 effort hours for one person).
Verify that people assigned to the project are all assigned a WBS task.
Resource Planning
One of the primary roles of the Project Manager is to find a way to successfully execute a project within
the organization’s resource constraints. Resource planning consists of identifying key stakeholders,
including sponsors, establishing a team that possesses the skills required to perform the work (labor
resources), and determining and arranging for the tools, equipment and processes (non-labor resources)
that will enable completion of the project.
Organization of the project team (core and extended team members) is a critical part of the planning
process. Poor project organization can lead to confusion and lack of productivity and is where many
projects run into trouble. A good organization facilitates communication and clearly defines roles and
responsibilities.
The Project Manager pragmatically assesses the skills of the available people on the project. The Project
Manager’s job is to determine the risks associated with the available skills and to build a plan that
realistically accounts for those skills. Unfortunately, skill level is not a yes/no factor. People have
varying degrees of skill, and the Project Manager needs to determine the level of schedule adjustment
that should be made based on the staff skill level.
Where staff with the necessary skills is largely unavailable for assignment on the project, the Project
Manager may have the option to hire the necessary talent or contract services to perform the work.
It is common for the client organization to be involved in the work of the project. In this case, it is just
as important that client staff be identified and scheduled as for the rest of the project team. Many
projects run into schedule delays because client staff the PM “thought” would be available for acceptance
testing have been assigned other work. If necessary, the PM should use a Collaboration Agreement form
to ensure these kinds of dependencies are accounted for.
also used in development of the project budget, where information about resource requirements is
essential. The Resource Plan should be approved by the Project Sponsor
dates in the project schedule for each of these Gate Reviews. Senior management uses the Gate Reviews
to approve the completion of a phase and as go/no-go decision points to proceed with the project. The
checkpoints ensure that the product or service delivered meet the project objectives in the time frame
established by senior management.
Phase Exit Criteria are deliverables, approvals or events that must have occurred in each phase
before the Project Team is allowed to declare that phase complete. These include materials,
personnel, approvals or other matters that must be available before the Project Team can begin
the next Phase (aka Phase Entrance Criteria).
Each project will have its own Phase Exit and Entrance criteria. The Project Phase Exit Plan document
records this information.
Initial budgetary estimates are often based on availability of funds or may be dictated by executive
requirement. These parameters may or may not coincide with the actual funds needed to perform the
project. For this reason, budget estimates are refined in the Planning phase until they are baselined at the
beginning of the Execution phase.
Budgeting serves as a control mechanism where actual costs can be compared with and measured against
the budget. The budget is often a firmly set parameter in the execution of the project. When a schedule
begins to slip, cost is proportionally affected. When project costs begin to escalate, the Project Manager
should revisit the Project Plan to determine whether scope, budget or schedule needs adjusting.
To develop the budget, the applicable cost factors associated with project tasks are identified. The
development of costs for each task should be simple and direct and consist of labor, material and other
direct costs. Cost of performing a task is directly related to the personnel assigned to the task, the
duration of the task, and the cost of any non-labor items required by the task.
Budget estimates are obtained from the people responsible for managing the work efforts. They provide
the expertise required to make the estimate and provide buy-in and accountability during the actual
performance of the task. These team members identify people or labor categories required to perform the
work and multiply the cost of the labor by the number of hours required to complete the task.
Determining how long the task performance takes is the single most difficult part of deriving a cost
estimate. The labor costs should factor in vacation time, sick leave, breaks, meetings and other day-to-
day activities. Not including these factors jeopardizes both scheduling and cost estimates.
Non-labor charges include such items as material costs, reproduction, travel, cost of capital (if leasing
equipment), computer center charges and equipment costs.
A risk is not an issue. An issue is a situation that has already occurred; a risk is the recognition that an
issue might occur. By recognizing potential threats and opportunities, the Project Manager can attempt to
avoid or minimize threats or leverage the impact of opportunities through proper actions.
It is important to create a plan for the risk management process to ensure that the level and visibility of
risk management are commensurate with the importance of the project to the organization. High profile,
high impact projects require more focus on risk management than smaller projects.
This activity should define the approach, tools, and data sources used to perform risk management on this
project. Different types of assessments may be appropriate, depending upon the project stage, amount of
information available, and flexibility remaining in risk management.
Risk Management should continue throughout the project. During the Planning Phase, the project team
should meet with other key stakeholders to build on the risks that were identified during Initiation. For
each identified risk, the team should:
Assess impact and probability of risk occurring, along with other risk parameters. During
Analysis, the project team can begin a more in-depth analysis by using the Risk Analysis
template.
Assign a risk owner
Determine a risk response plan, including any contingency plans, for each risk deemed of
consequence to the project
The Project Team or other stakeholders use an Issue Document to report issues. The Project
Team then uses the same document to record all details related to the issues and their resolution
The Issue Log contains information about every reported issue and serves as both an issue
management tool and as a historical reference
Action Plan Checklist - Determine Process for Issue Identification and Resolution
Determine Issue Management approach.
Define Issue Documentation procedures (e.g., Issue Document and Issue Log)
All requests for change in the project should be submitted or recorded on a Change Request Form and
tracked with a Change Request Log.
Some of the details related to organizational change management will not become apparent until the
completion of detailed design of the solution. The expectation during the Planning phase is to develop a
high-level understanding of the impact of the project on the organization, and then lay the groundwork
for efforts that will move the organization to accept the changes that the project will require.
The purpose of using quality management is to improve products and services while achieving cost
reductions throughout the project. Quality management requires broadening the scope of the quality
concept to a systems approach. Because the three processes (quality planning, assurance and control)
interact with each other, as well as other processes within project management, quality management must
be regarded as a system. To effectively implement a quality system, the project team will:
Determine how best to meet those standards. The activities within the quality planning process
basically translate existing quality policy and standards into a Quality Plan through a variety of
tools and techniques.
"Quality Assurance" requires that the Project Team evaluate overall project performance on a regular
basis to provide confidence that the project will meet the relevant quality standards. This involves the use
of quality audits to ensure that quality standards and the business and project requirements are met.
Successful quality processes always strive to see quality through the eyes of the end user (customer).
Customers are the ultimate judges of the quality of the product they receive. They will typically judge a
project by whether or not their requirements are met. To ensure delivery of a quality product, the Project
Team should ensure that requirements are addressed at each phase of the project.
It is important to include a process that validates that the currently defined requirements will be
satisfactory to the customer. It is counterproductive to develop a system that meets a documented
requirement if you and the customer know that the requirement has changed. The change management
process helps to control the number and impact of such changes, but quality processes must be in place in
order to make changes when they are necessary. The project team should also verify that the
requirements are written in such a way that the design team can effectively design a product that will
satisfy the customer. In summary, the project team will:
Define quality standards
Define quality management processes
Validate the correctness and completeness of requirements
Verify that requirements are effectively documented
Document the approach and plan to accomplish all of this in the Quality Plan
Implementation of CM processes should be carried out on all projects, especially large or complex
projects. In short, CM is a necessity whose processes should be implemented at the department level to
ensure a consistent general approach, with consideration given to the special functions or needs of the
project itself. The complexity or size of the configuration system is less important than its functionality
and intent.
Effective CM requires an effective and well-defined effort. The following are CM functions:
• Defining who will be responsible for and have authority over configuration management
• Setting standards, procedures, and guidelines for the full Project Team to follow
• Defining tools, resources, and facilities to be used for configuration management
Configuration Management allows the project team to gain control over changes to key deliverables,
including project documents (Version Control).
• It documents the performance targets the project intends to achieve in four areas:
quality, project scope, schedule, resources and budgets
• It sets the allowed variance (boundaries) that both the Governance Body and Project
Team agree upon for each target. If the allowed variance is exceeded during the project, an
interim project review will be triggered
When IT is involved in a project, this document also sets the targets and allowed variance for the IT work
stream or sub-project within the overall project. The Project Performance Commitment document is
presented to the Governance Body during the Plan Commit gate presentation, and must be updated to
reflect the latest project status for the subsequent gate reviews.
Even during the Planning phase, the development of the Project Plan is an iterative process. Each
element of the plan is regularly revisited for changes and refinements, based on further analysis and
decisions made in developing other plan elements. This refinement also develops buy-in from the Project
Team and Stakeholders. Note, however, that project baselines (i.e. Schedule, Budget, Scope and Quality)
should only be changed through a formal Change Control process.
The Project Plan may be consolidated in the Project Plan document. This is a linkage document that
points to all other planning documents used in this project. Hyperlinks within the Project Plan document
make it easy to find all of the elements of the Project Plan.
It is critical to get buy-in to the Project Plan from the involved parties prior to actually starting the
project. Approval of the plan commits the resources needed to perform the work.
Deliverables
Project Plan
The Project Plan is a formal, approved document used to manage and control project execution. It is a
compilation of text and stand-alone deliverables created during the Initiation and Planning stages. The
level of detail should be appropriate for the scope, complexity and risk of the project.
Project Charter
Project Overview that includes Business Goals and Project Objectives
Scope Statement
Project Deliverables and Milestones
Assumptions and Constraints
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
Project Procurement Plan
Project Schedule
Project Organization and Governance
External Interfaces
Internal Structure
Roles and Responsibilities
Resource and Staffing Plan
Project Phase Exit Plan (e.g. Systems Development Life-Cycle Phase Checkpoints)
Project Cost Estimate and Budget
Risk Management Approach
While each of these areas should be discussed within the Project Plan, it is still imperative to develop
documents and processes that describe each of these in detail.
Once the Project Manager completes the work of the Analysis Phase, a completed Project Phase Exit
document should be brought to the Project Sponsor for approval. For smaller projects, approval of this
document is sufficient to declare Analysis Phase complete. For larger projects, additional review by the
Governance Body is required at the Plan Commit review. The Governance Body will typically focus on
the following questions:
Have the assumptions made during the Initiation Phase been verified?
Are business requirements and user needs understood? Does the project adequately address
them?
Is the product of the project (product, service or outcome) defined unambiguously, and does it
reflect appropriate functional, technical, schedule and cost trade-offs?
Have the major risks been identified and characterized, and are there effective risk response plans
for them?
Is the overall project plan sound, with sufficient details for the subsequent phases?
Is there agreement that the refined cost benefit analysis shows a strong return relative to other
projects? Are the benefits objectively measurable?
Are appropriate and adequate resources available and assigned to the project? Do they have the
capability to meet time and quality requirements?
Is the project still aligned with the organization’s overall strategy? Do we still want to fund it?
Will this solution be cost-effective post launch? What are the estimated ongoing operations
costs?
The level and extent to which the plan will be reviewed is based on the size of the project as stated in
dollars or period of time. Ultimately, the review process allows for executive management buy-in and
approval of the plan. Once the Project Plan is approved, the Project Manager is given the authority,
resources and funding to execute the project plan. A Plan Commit Template is available to guide the
Project Manager in preparing the Plan Commit presentation.
PLC: Design
The following sections discuss in detail those key activities required to complete the Project Planning
activities of the PLC: Design Phase. Some of this material pertains primarily to software development
projects.
1. Detailed Designs
The Product of the project is defined at a high level in the Project Charter. During the PLC: Design
Phase, this definition is greatly enhanced and made very specific, and very complete. For example,
customer requirements that were gathered and analyzed in detail during the Analysis Phase are used to
develop product design specifications. From these, detail designs are created that will guide development
of deliverables. The specifics of how all this is done varies greatly depending on the specific disciplines
involved in the project (e.g. hardware infrastructure versus software development versus launch of a new
marketing campaign). However, regardless of the kind of project, it is essential that the project team
develop as complete an understanding as possible of what they will build and how they will build and
deliver it.
The Requirements Traceability Matrix is a tool that the project team can use to manage requirements,
design-specifications and test cases. When this process is automated, the project team can gain some
assurance that requirements changes will result in design changes, and that the tests used during the Build
& Test phase will actually test the correct functionality.
The Project Manager is responsible for ensuring that the Change Control process is used. Proposed
changes can be reviewed at regular project team meetings, and special meetings may be called to review
truly significant changes. All changes to project baselines that exceed predetermined limits (as set in the
Project Performance Commitment document) must receive the approval of the Project Sponsor, and then
the Governance Body,
Management of scope, cost, schedule and quality is effectively the same process during PLC: Design and
PLC: Build & Test. Specific activities related to this work is fully described in the next major section of
this Guide, Project Execution and Control.
The level and extent to which the plan will be reviewed is based on the size of the project as stated in
dollars or period of time. Ultimately, the review process allows for executive management buy-in and
approval of the plan. Once the design and approach are approved and signed, the Project Manager is
given the authority to enter into the PLC: Build & Test phase. A Design Review Template is available to
guide the Project Manager in preparing the Design Review presentation.
Once a project moves into the Managing phase, the project team and the necessary resources to carry out
the project should be in place and ready to perform project activities. The Project Plan should have been
approved by a Governance Body and baselines agreed upon by the primary stakeholders. The project
team, and specifically the Project Manager’s, focus now shifts from planning the project to executing the
project plan, while simultaneously observing and analyzing the work being done.
Projects are complex and it is usually the case that project plans as originally conceived are not perfect.
For this reason, it is necessary to ensure that measurements against Project Plans, specifications, and the
original project feasibility concept continue to be collected, analyzed and acted upon throughout the
project life cycle. With a well defined project management process in place, management has some
assurance that each project team will execute projects using best practices and methods, with proven
control, tracking and corrective action activities in place. For example:
• Schedule: a well defined schedule will break work up into approximately 80-hour segments to
ensure that delays are caught early and corrected. In addition, major deliverables should come
out of the project on a regular basis, e.g. in 1 to 3 month intervals
• Scope: the Change Control Plan should allow the project team to effectively manage changes in
cost, time, quality and scope, e.g. to only allow scope changes that are necessary for project
success and to manage the budget and schedule changes that can result. As a function of this,
client requirements are carefully managed
• Quality: the project team should have clear guidance from the Quality Plan as to how an
appropriate level of quality will be maintained in project deliverables, e.g. enough to satisfy
client expectations but not so much that the project would be guilty of “gold plating”
• Risk: by keeping a close watch on existing and new project risks, the project team can anticipate
risk events before they occur and reduce negative impact by taking appropriate action
• Resources: the Project Manager carefully monitors the quantity and quality of the project
team’s work output, and provides additional training or makes staffing changes as needed
• Communication: attention must be paid to keeping interested parties up-to-date with project
status, dealing with procurement and contract administration issues, helping manage quality
control, and dealing with project changes that may arise. Steps are taken to keep the client
involved and fully aware that this is their project
The Execution and Control phase also includes project control activities. Project control involves the
regular review of metrics and status reports in order to identify variances from the planned project
baseline. The variances are determined by comparing the actual performance metrics from the Execution
and Control phase against the baseline metrics assigned during the Planning phase. These variances are
fed into control processes to evaluate their meaning. If significant variances are observed (i.e., variances
that jeopardize the completion of the project objectives), adjustments to the plan are made by repeating
and adjusting the appropriate Project Planning strategies and documents. A significant variance from the
plan does not explicitly require a change, but should be reviewed to see if preventive action is warranted.
For example, a missed activity finish date may require adjustments to the current staffing plan, reliance
on overtime, or trade-off between budget and schedule objectives. Project control also includes taking
preventative action in anticipation of possible problems. Project Execution proceeds as a continual
looping process that consists of:
At the end of the Build & Test Phase, the Project Manager brings the project to a Rollout Review with
the Governance Body. If that body agrees that the project is on track to deliver on its promise, and they
agree that the project is ready, then the Project Manager will proceed to the Implementation Phase.
During Implement all project deliverables are rolled out to their intended customers.
Activities
The following is a list of key activities required to execute and control a project:
Manage Risk
Risk identification, monitoring and resolution are key tools for successfully completing a project. The
Risk Response Plan, which was fully developed during the Planning Phase, must be kept up-to-date as
the project moves forward. This is necessary because a project’s risk profile changes over time.
Some risks will become moot, e.g. a serious risk to the planning process may no longer be of
concern during Execution
Other risks may increase or decrease in priority as their probability goes up or down
Finally, new risks may only become apparent later in the project
The Risk Manager (usually the project manager or a project team member assigned by the project
manager) should make risk a topic of discussion at least monthly at project team meetings, and then
update the Risk Response Plan accordingly. Some Response Plans may involve substantial budget and
have impact on schedule, in which case separate management approval may be required. This Plan must
be kept current until the Project Closeout phase, and all stakeholders should have access to it.
In the race to keep the organization ahead of the technology curve, Project Managers also may have to
engage their teams in projects that have limited budgets, tight schedules and high customer expectations,
all of which are sources of risk.
The Governance Body includes risk in its evaluation of overall project value. If a project’s risks increase
substantially during its execution, the Governance Body may choose to delay or terminate it. It is the job
of the project team to ensure true risk is made known as a means of supporting good business decisions.
Communicate Information
The Communication Plan is an important tool during the Managing phase. The Project Manager will
typically rely on this as a constant reminder of how information must flow among all project
stakeholders. For example, the Communication Plan usually will define how to keep key stakeholders
informed about project status. There are many aspects to good project communications:
Joint project reviews are a good way to bring visibility to all areas of the project. They provide
an opportunity to discuss important issues and make management decisions on the project with
input from several sources. Joint project reviews can involve the Project Manager, project team
members, project Stakeholders and organization management, depending on the issues being
discussed. The frequency and topics covered at these meetings should be outlined in the
Communication Plan
The Project Manager may be requested to make regular reports to the Governance Body or one of
its subgroups
The Project Plan should be accessible to all Stakeholders. This may be accomplished by placing
an electronic copy of the plan in shared storage, publication on a project web site or other means.
The Communication Plan may specify that particular Stakeholders receive portions of the Project
Plan in varying format, depending on their communication needs
Project team meetings should be held regularly. Attendees should have an agenda available
before the meeting, and careful notes should be taken during the meeting of any decisions made.
Meeting minutes should be made available to Stakeholders along with any “to-do” lists that may
have been generated during the meetings
The Project Manager should ensure that team members always know what tasks they should be
working on now, next week and the week after. The entire project team should regularly hear
about the overall purpose of the project, so that they understand the true value of their work
The project plan should include provision for regular meetings with clients to review preliminary
deliverables. Such meetings ensure that deliverables development is on track, serve as a check
that the deliverables are still aligned with client needs, and help to keep the client involved in the
project
The Project Manager should know in advance what level of approval is needed when information
about the project is sent to external authorities
The Project Manager should stay in constant communication with the project team, both formally
and informally. Informal discussion is sometimes the best way to determine team morale, true
project status, looming difficulties, etc.
As the project moves forward, the Project Manager should update the Communication Plan to
take into account changes in staffing and in the communication needs of that staff
Manage Schedule
It is important for the project team to understand at all times exactly where the project stands with respect
to project schedule (i.e., Is the project ahead of, on, or behind schedule?). The procedures used to
determine status and then update the schedule are key to ensuring that accurate schedules are maintained.
Without these procedures, invalid data may cause inaccurate schedule performance reporting and this can
have impact on overall project cost.
The validation technique will improve management control by improving the quality of the information
reported. As a result, potential changes to baseline may be caught earlier, allowing more time for
corrective action. The implementation of specific techniques should provide these benefits without
burdening those responsible for project delivery.
Schedule control is one of the most difficult but important activities within project control. The project
schedule can be affected by any number of issues from resources to funding, vendors, weather, and
anything in between. The ability of a Project Manager to manage the schedule of a project and deliver it
on time is a high-visibility concern for project success from a customer point of view.
Schedule issues come from a variety of sources but there should be a single, focused method for dealing
with schedule changes. If a potential schedule problem is discovered, the problem must be investigated
and the cause uncovered as soon as possible. Once the problem is discovered, a plan should be created
for correcting the problem in the shortest allowable time with the least impact. It is also advisable to
bring forward alternatives and associated costs.
Schedule control is something that typically is managed at the project level by the Project Manager.
However, it is very important to make the customer aware that a schedule change has occurred.
Furthermore, the customer needs to be made aware of what is being done to fix the issue and the impact
it will have on the project’s performance and deliverables.
It is standard practice to baseline the schedule at the start of the project. This allows all schedule changes
to be displayed against the original project schedule. If schedule slippage becomes severe it may be
advisable to re-baseline the project. As this involved change to one of the project baselines, it should
only be done through the formally approved Change Control Process.
Schedule control is an important aspect of project management that is often overlooked during strategic
projects. Technology projects may have several different dependencies or factors that can influence
product delivery dates, and ultimately, customer satisfaction. These factors and dependencies may
include, but may not be limited to, the following:
Availability of staff or resources
Delivery of equipment or software
Unexpected events
Dependence on deliverables from other projects or outside personnel
Because customers sometimes see meeting the schedule as the most important part of a project, it is a
good idea for Project Managers to hold regular project schedule reviews. Work managers may manage
several schedules within a large or complex strategic project at a deliverable or functional level.
Therefore, having the “owners” of these schedules meeting at regular intervals is of great benefit to the
Project Manager. The Project Manager is responsible for integrating these project schedules and making
them understandable for all of the project’s Stakeholders.
It is considered good practice to have a Deliverables List that is regularly updated as deliverables are
completed. The Project Manager may consider using Earned Value as a means of measuring project
“percent complete”. Such a measure depends on accurate information about what work is truly done.
Note that deliverables may be considered complete by the project team, only to be returned for rework by
Quality Assurance. Deliverables are only truly “complete” when they can be delivered to the client.
Invalid data can lead the Project Manager to set inappropriate client expectations. It is especially
important to let clients know early if the schedule is in trouble, so that they have an opportunity to
develop contingency plans.
Schedule data should be collected on a regular basis and fed into a project performance reporting process.
overcome, and new processes fully implemented and accepted. Mere compliance with change is
generally not sufficient for true change to take root and become part of what the organization is.
Manage Scope
Scope control is a straightforward concept. An effective scope control process identifies and manages all
elements (e.g., product and process requirements) inside and outside the project that increase or decrease
scope beyond that required in the original, agreed-upon project Scope Statement.
Scope changes will come from the perceived need for a change in a project deliverable or process that
may affect its functionality and in most cases the amount of work needed to perform the project. A scope
change is a very crucial occurrence.
A scope change most likely will require a change in project funding, resources and/or time. All scope
change requests fall under the general Change Management Process and should be dealt with as described
in the Change Management Plan. Usually, scope changes are submitted in writing. In the case of
significant change requests, a pre-defined group of key stakeholders should convene to discuss the
potential change and its anticipated impact on the project and the organization. This body should have the
authority to make decisions for the projectl. Once a decision is made to increase or reduce scope, the
change must be authorized by the Governance Body. Any changes that are agreed upon must be
documented and signed as a matter of formal scope control.
In addition, the impact of the scope change may ramify throughout the projects planning documents.
Documents such as the Project Budget, WBS and Project Schedule will have to be re-evaluated and
updated to include the scope change impacts. Scope changes need to be communicated clearly and
effectively to the project team by the Project Manager. Team members will want, and need, to understand
how the scope change affects their area of responsibility.
Scope control is extremely important within projects. It is not uncommon for team members to attempt to
give the customer something other than, or in addition to, the original stated requirements. Customers are
also known to ask for seemingly innocuous changes “off the record”, and these changes can actually have
major impact on the project. Doing any work that is outside or beyond the stated work, as called out in
the original requirements, is sometimes referred to as “gold plating”. Whether scope changes are
proposed by the customer or by the project team, they must be formally managed.
Manage Quality
Quality Planning is largely complete by the time the Execution and Control Phase begins, with the
exception that some formal test plan elements (e.g. test cases and test scripts in software development
projects) may not be completed during Planning. For this reason, the project’s quality activities during
Execution and Control mostly consist of Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA).
QC involves monitoring specific project results to determine if they comply with relevant quality
standards and identifying ways to eliminate causes of unsatisfactory results. Quality control should be
performed throughout the project. Project results include both product results, such as deliverables, and
management results, such as cost and schedule performance. Quality control is often performed by a
quality control unit, or a similarly titled organization unit, although this is not a requirement. This QC
group may report within the project or to an authority outside the project.
QA is the systematic examination of project process to ensure that the project team is actually doing
things as they said they would, and that they are following product quality standards as planned. By
evaluating overall project process and product performance on a regular basis, QA provides confidence
that the project will satisfy the relevant quality standards and provide client satisfaction. Accordingly,
while it is important that each team member be responsible for the quality execution of tasks, a QA team
is typically formed to work with the project team. The QA team is not included in the project team and
therefore reports to an authority outside the team. Having QA report through a reporting chain outside
the project facilitates problem escalation. Problem escalation is the process of moving a problem to a
higher management level if sufficient attention is not given by the Project Manager. The independent
reporting chain provides a check and balance on the project. QA plays an integral role in the delivery of
quality throughout the project. This team ensures that the quality plan is executed as planned.
As an organization’s quality processes mature, the need for the external quality unit may decrease.
Nonetheless, management may require that some level of QA be performed on every project just to
ensure that project performance reports are truly valid. It is advisable for the project team to have regular
discussions about what quality means in their project, and what steps they are taking to deliver it. Real
quality happens when everyone on the team takes full responsibility for it.
Unfortunately, whenever any of the other control mechanisms (e.g., schedule or cost) get off their
baseline, it is normally the quality control of a project that suffers. As noted previously, projects require a
lot of attention to schedule and cost. Likewise, instituting quality control within a project is very
important. Setting up quality control audits and management processes that are carried out continually
during the development and testing phases of the project’s life-cycle is absolutely critical for delivering
acceptable projects.
Manage Costs
Projects may fail to control costs, or go over budget, for many reasons. Often it is not a single problem
but a series of small problems combined that permit cost control to be sacrificed and prevent the project
from being completed successfully.
Cost control is not simply a reporting process. It includes the searching out of the “why” for both positive
and negative variances between the scheduled and actual costs. It must be thoroughly integrated with the
other control processes (scope change control, schedule control, quality control and others). For example,
inappropriate responses to cost variances can cause quality or schedule problems or produce an
unacceptable level of risk later in the project.
Cost control is a process highly valued by project Stakeholders. This is also an area where
unpredictability can wreak havoc on the plans laid out within a project. A Project Manager must be able
to monitor the actual budgets of labor and resources against the baselines as laid out in the Project
Budget Estimate. This is especially true of new technology areas in which the cost of labor or resources
is especially high. Furthermore, the length and complexity of a project will have a direct impact on its
potential to go over budget, with lengthy and complex projects being at higher risk.
Setting budget limits and monitoring variances on budgets must be done early and often. Budget
problems tend to compound themselves if left unattended. More money could be spent trying to fix
budget, scope or schedule issues near the end of a project than should have been spent on the entire
project. In many cases the budget is a fixed amount. In those cases, if other actions fail to bring the
project’s costs into budget alignment, the scope must be reduced or the project terminated.
Manage Issues
The purpose of the issues management process is to provide a mechanism for organizing, maintaining
and tracking the resolution of issues that cannot be resolved at the individual level or that persist. The
approach consists of issue control mechanisms and a well-defined process that enables the project team to
identify, prioritize, and address issues.
The Issue Management process should give everyone involved with, or affected by, the project a way to
report issues or problems. The Issue Document provides a means to document the problem, assess the
impact of the problem, make recommendations and determine the cost (people and assets) and time
required for resolving the problem.
For this process to work, individuals must submit information on the issues to be considered. It is
customary to allow any project team member, customer or stakeholder to submit an issue. This must be
done in writing through use of the Issue Document. All issues are recorded in an Issue Log.
All issues should be reviewed on a regular basis (e.g., at the project status meetings, since this group will
typically meet on a weekly or biweekly basis).
Typically, when the issue or problem has been resolved and verified, recording the actual date the
problem was resolved and the approval authority closes the issue. Some issues may need executive
management approval. The appropriate processes will be followed to update contracts and baseline
documents.
Note that issues are risk events come to life. If the project suffers from numerous unexpected issues, it is
appropriate to take some time for a re-evaluation of its risk management process.
It is standard practice that the project manager delivers reports to both executive management and the
project team. Although the frequency of the reports may sometimes vary, they should correspond with
the executive meetings or when the Project Manager deems necessary. For executive management
reports, this is typically on a monthly basis or upon major project life-cycle phase or milestone
completion. It is helpful to keep the status report due date consistent (e.g., every Monday by 1:00 p.m.).
This makes it easier for the team members to complete their reporting.
Status reporting is an integral part of the project management process. It is the means by which the
project team and executive management stay informed about the progress and key activities required to
successfully complete the project. The purpose of the status report is to provide a standard format for the
formal exchange of information on the progress of the project.
The information shared in the status report should be in a consistent format throughout the project. The
project team should prepare status reports detailing activities, accomplishments, milestones, identified
issues, risks and needs. Some level of recovery plans should be prepared for activities that are not on
schedule, and mitigation strategies should be prepared for anticipated problems. Problems in projects
must not be hidden. Executive management wants every project to succeed and is usually willing to take
steps to help out a project in trouble if they are aware of the issue. Hiding problems takes away
management’s prerogative to provide assistance.
Status meetings are conducted to discuss project status and to set direction and priorities for the project.
The level of detail and objective of status reports and status meetings vary based upon the audience,
project size and impact, and the risk associated with a project.
The three primary status report audiences are:
Project team – The project status report and status meeting includes the lowest level of detail.
This is a forum for the Project Manager to discuss project progress and status with the team and
to implement project direction and priorities as set by the Project Sponsor (and possibly the
Governance Body). Larger projects, which are divided into teams, will also develop team status
reports and conduct team status meetings. Project Status Meetings are typically conducted every
week.
Project Sponsor – The Project Sponsor Status Meeting is a venue for the Project Manager to
discuss key project issues. The Project Sponsor will assist the Project Manager in resolving key
issues and help set project direction and priorities. The project status report is also provided to
the Project Sponsor.
Executive Stakeholders – This group can include Business Process Owners, the Executive
Sponsor and others. Meetings with this group, should they be needed, are generally intended to
evaluate the overall progress of the project.
Action Plan Checklist - Report at Periodic (e.g. Monthly) Status Review Meetings
Identify key issues which impact the organization and require action on the part of the Executive Committee
Provide a copy of the Project Review Status Report to the Project Review Committee on a periodic (e.g. monthly)
basis
Provide status and discuss key issues with the Project Review Committee
Implement issue resolution plans as discussed with the Project Review Committee
Revise any related or impacted planning documents
CSF Project Review Committee is informed of project status and key issues
CSF Project Review Committee sets project direction and supports the issue resolution process
CSF Project Review Committee sets project priorities
project purchasing that should be integrated within the Procurement Plan. These guidelines will outline
the policy for solicitation, source selection and contract administration. Although the solicitation and
contracting responsibilities may not always be managed by the Project Manager, it is still important that
the Project Manager have a fundamental understanding of the department’s contracting and procurement
policies.
The Project Manager’s responsibility in the Execution and Control phase is to provide input into new
product requirements for the services or products that were not planned for in the Planning phase.
Administer Contract/Vendor
The Project Manager is responsible for ensuring that any outside vendors working on the project, once
contracted to do the work, meet the contractual agreements specified within their contracts. Project
Managers will also be responsible for tracking, reviewing and analyzing the performance of contractors
on a project. This performance reporting will be the basis for any contractual changes that need to be
made during the life of the contract. Finally, Project Managers will play an important role in oversight
and review of any contract changes that will affect the project.
Contract administration is the process of ensuring that the vendor’s performance meets contractual
requirements. This is accomplished through the use and monitoring of a Project Plan from the vendor,
periodic progress reports and the completion of deliverables as delineated in a project statement of work.
The Project Manager is to ensure that the vendors follow appropriate technical and project management
methodologies.
Setting up procedures for contract control and contract change is vital to dealing with the unexpected
situations that can occur during a project. Without procedures in place, contract issues could go
unresolved and result in project delays. It is important to have on-going, two way communications with
the vendors (partnership).
Changes to Project Baselines (i.e. Budget, Schedule, Quality and Scope) must be done through use of a
formal Change Management Process and may require Governance Body approval. The Project Manager
may change other Project Plan components (e.g., Risk Response, Communication Plan) as needed.
Once the Project Team completes development work, project deliverables should be reviewed and
approved. This should be done first by the Project Sponsor at the conclusion of User Acceptance
Testing, and then by the Governance Body at the Rollout Review. When the work of the Build & Test
Phase is done, a completed Project Phase Exit document should be brought to the Project Sponsor for
approval. For smaller projects, approval of this document is sufficient to declare Build & Test Phase
complete. For larger projects, additional review by the Governance Body is required at the Rollout
Review. Typically the Governance Body will focus on the following questions:
• Does the product of the project (e.g. service, solution or process/organizational improvement)
meet expectations?
• Do the results of testing and validation indicate readiness to fully implement the solution?
• Are business processes developed and supported by documentation and training materials?
• Is required organizational alignment identified and sufficiently planned?
• Are plans for implementation complete and adequate?
• Are plans for transition to operations complete and adequate?
• Have all major technical and operational issues been identified and managed?
• What are the criteria for implementation success and disbanding the Project Team?
• Is there agreement that the updated cost benefit analysis is still acceptable?
• Is the project still aligned with the organization’s overall strategy? Do we still want to fund it?
• Will this solution be cost-effective post launch? What are the estimated ongoing operations
costs?
The Governance Body may also review the Implementation Plan and, when applicable, the Training Plan
to ensure that the project is truly ready for its final phase. As a result of Governance Body review, it may
be necessary to update the Project Performance Commitments form.
The level and extent to which project deliverables will be reviewed is based on the size of the project as
stated in dollars or period of time. Ultimately, the review process allows for executive management buy-
in and approval of the move to Implementation. Once the deliverables are approved and signed off, the
Project Manager is given the authority to enter into the PLC: Implement phase. A Rollout Review
Template is available to guide the Project Manager in preparing the Rollout Review presentation.
Implementation
During the Implementation portion of Project Execution and Control, all deliverables of the project are
rolled out to their intended recipients, or the product is put into production. During typical IT projects
(e.g. rollout of a new financial system), it is during the Implementation Phase that user training is done,
delivery is made to the ultimate customer of the project, and the Project Sponsor accepts that delivery.
The specific activities required to produce and implement project deliverables are entirely dependent
upon the nature of the deliverables, and are outside of the scope of this document. It is the purpose of the
Project Management process described in this document to effectively plan and manage those activities
to ensure that the project delivers on its promise.
The best way to manage stakeholder acceptance is to convene a final meeting with all necessary
stakeholders to review the product delivered against the baseline requirements and specifications. By this
time, any deviations from the established baseline will have been documented and approved, but it is still
good policy to inform the stakeholders of any significant baseline deviations, justifications, and future
action plans. At this meeting, agreement can be reached to officially close any open action items or
program level issues or else reassign them to the support organization.
By drawing all of the stakeholders together in a single meeting, the Project Manager avoids the time-
consuming process of clearing up open issues on an individual basis. The final deliverable of this
meeting should be a statement created by the Project Manager describing the project’s final deliverables
in comparison with the authorized project baseline documents. Approval is verified via the signature on a
project closure document by all of the key stakeholders who signed the original project baseline
documentation (i.e., the Project Plan). This document is unique to the particular project and includes
pertinent deliverables, key features and important information about final product delivery.
For Sponsor approval, the project manager should bring a completed Project Phase Exit document, with
stakeholder approval documents as backup, to the Project Sponsor for approval. For smaller projects,
approval of this document is sufficient to declare PLC: Implementation complete.
For larger projects, additional review by the Governance Body is required at the Rollout Review.
Typically the Governance Body will focus on the following questions:
• Are the Sponsor and other customers satisfied with the outcome of the project?
• Has the transition plan been enacted and is it adequate?
• Are all major technical and operational issues being transferred to the Operations and
Maintenance staff?
• Are plans in place to measure the Business Value that this project will generate?
Deliverables
Along with the status report form, the following may be attached:
Updated Gantt charts
Recovery plans for activities not on schedule—defined by the project team as being late (e.g.,
slippage in the critical path activities)
Corrective action plans for expected problems
Resolution to assigned action items (including the issues and action process)
Issue Log
Others, as appropriate.
The team may choose to create Executive Status Reports as well if they will enhance communication
with management.
3. Project-Specific Deliverables
These deliverables depend on the nature of the project and the selected systems development life-cycle
(e.g., waterfall, rapid application development, RUP, etc.). Most of these deliverables should have been
identified during the Planning phase.
Examples of these project-specific deliverables might include functional design documents, test plans, a
training plan, and a requirements traceability matrix.
These activities are particularly important on large projects with extensive records and resources.
Activities
The following is a list of key activities required to close-out a project:
Contracts can be brought to closure for a variety of reasons, including contract completion, early
termination or failure to perform. Contract closure is a typical but important part of project management.
It is a simple process, but close attention should be paid so that no room is left for liability of the
organization..
Key stakeholders (Project Sponsor, Business Process Owners, end user representatives)
Maintenance and operations staff (when there is a maintenance phase).
Vendor representatives (optional, but useful if the vendor will do this kind of work again for the
organization)
The Lessons Learned Report documents the successes and failures of the project. It provides an
historical record of the planned and actual results of many project activities. It is important to include in
this report new ideas that were successful in the project and make recommendations on how these
processes might be adapted for other projects. Parts of this report may be used to share project successes
with other groups within the organization. In the same way that problem identification can lead to
improvements, successes must be shared so they can be repeated. Where possible, successes should be
translated into procedures that can be followed by future projects. Other selected metrics on the project
can also be collected, based on documented procedures. The report may also contain recommendations
for future projects of similar size and scope.
Following preparation of the Lessons Learned Report, the project information is archived. Historical
project data is an important source of information to help improve future projects.
The specific information archived for a project will vary depending on the type of project and the
requirements of the organization. Typically, the following project data are archived:
Project Charter
Project Plan, including the Project Scope Statement, Risk Management Plan, etc.
Financial Records
Correspondence
Meeting notes
Status reports
Contract file
Technical documents
Files, programs, tools, etc., placed under configuration management
Vendor records
Other documents/information.
All hard-copy records should be stored following standard organizational record-retention guidelines.
Many of the technical records and automated versions will be turned over to personnel responsible for
maintenance and operation of the system. Summary technical information should be electronically stored
for historical reference to facilitate later review. The project archive includes a description of the files
being submitted, the application (including version) used to create the archived materials, and a point of
contact if further information is needed.
The summary project management information includes information such as a description of the project,
a project organization chart, budgeted and actual cost, and schedule baseline(s) and actual schedule.
assumptions associated with the project budget amounts and budget changes documented throughout the
project are included in the archive.
In making this determination, members of the Governance Body will ask the following questions:
Does the customer/user feedback indicate that the solution, service or process/org improvement
is ready to enter a support/ maintenance mode?
Have the criteria been met for disbanding the Project Team?
Upon conclusion of this review, and with agreement of the Governance Body, the project may be
considered formally Closed.
6. Distribution of Resources
Throughout the project, team members are added to and removed from the project team as the need for
various skills comes and goes. At project end, all remaining staff should be placed in their next
assignments as expeditiously as possible. This not only makes good fiscal sense, but it also helps to
maintain a sense of security within the project team. Team members should be told their next assignment
as soon as it is known. This is especially true of contract staff. If contractors are unsure about their next
assignment, they could choose to take other work to maintain job security at a crucial point in the project
when their skills are most needed. Good and ongoing communication is important in these matters.
In a similar manner, project resources such as computers and software, office equipment and
communications gear, should be carefully controlled at the end of the project. It is best to have
determined in advance how these resources will be used once the project has ended. This will ensure that
company assets are put to most effective use.
To ensure that staff turnover and resource distribution are properly planned and controlled, timing of staff
assignments and distribution of project resources should be documented in the Resource Plan during the
Planning Phase, and updated as needed.
7. Celebration
Celebration should be a constant theme throughout the project, with a final celebration of project Close
one of the most important celebratory events. This is an opportunity for the Project Manager to publicly
thank the project team and other key stakeholders for their hard work and dedication, for management to
recognize the value of the project team, and for the Project Sponsor to speak of the value of the work to
the organization. End-of-Project celebration, when done well, can energize the participants and thereby
have impact on projects that follow. It also builds the sense of community that can be so important in a
successful organization.
Project celebration should be held immediately after the Governance Body officially closes the project,
with as little delay as possible. The entire project team and all key stakeholders should be present. The
active participation of senior management figures can make the event more meaningful and a more
powerful experience for all involved.
Deliverables
• Project sign-off
• Staffing and skills
• Project organizational structure
• Experience with and recommendations for:
• Schedule management
• Cost management
• Risk management
• Quality management
• Configuration management
• Customer expectations management
• Lessons learned
• Recommendations for process improvement and/or template modifications.
A successful project requires that the project team participate (at some level) in the planning process,
buy-in to the project plan, and be responsible for completion of assignments. A defined formal structure
of roles and responsibilities for the project team and participating stakeholders helps everyone understand
what they are supposed to do. It provides each individual with a clear understanding of the authority
given and responsibility necessary for the successful accomplishment of project activities.
1. Governance Body
The Governance Body, however comprised, is a key driver of the Project Portfolio Management process
as described in the PLC. It is responsible for establishing strategic plans and for ensuring that funded
projects are consistent with those plans. It balances ROI with project risk, approves project funding and
resourcing, and approves project commitments. It is also responsible for developing the procedures to
ensure that organizational policies are followed.
General Responsibilities
Prioritize organizational needs and include them in strategic plans
Ensure that sufficient resources are available to conduct projects
Review/approve commitments to external entities (e.g., vendors, other agencies)
At Project Closeout
Ensure Business Process Owner accepts project results
Contribute to Lessons Learned
2. Executive Sponsor
General Responsibilities
Articulate organization requirements
Provide business direction to the Project Team
Champion the project to provide exposure and buy-in from the organization’s executives
Communicate views on project progress and success factors to the Project Team and
other Stakeholders
Initiation Phase
Promote the strategic plans and guidance of the Business Process Owner
Be an advocate for Business Process Owner needs
Establish effective communication about the project with the project team and executive
management
Approve the Project Charter and champion it before the Governance Body at the Project
Commit meeting
Planning Phase
Assign Project Manager
Attend project kick-off meeting.
Participate in planning sessions
Ensure adequate resources are available
Obtain additional funding for project when necessary
Review and approve the high level Project Plan
Champion the project before the Governance Body at the Plan Commit meeting
Managing Phase
As the project team progresses through Design, Build & Test and Implementation, attend
executive reviews
Help resolve requirements problems.
Help resolve issues, as appropriate
Attend and participates as needed at Project Status Reviews
Champion the project before the Governance Body at the Design and Rollout Reviews
Closeout Phase
Attend Final Acceptance meeting
Signs-off on project completion
Attend the Lessons Learned meeting; participate in the Post Project Assessment
3. Project Sponsor
The Project Sponsor is an agent and advocate for, and is usually within the reporting chain of, the
Executive Sponsor. The Project Sponsor is responsible for providing direction to the Project Team and is
accountable for delivering the project within the committed scope, schedule, and budget. The Project
Sponsor is expected to use their influence to resolve issues and to leverage opportunities for the project.
General Responsibilities
Serve as representative and advocate for the Executive Sponsor
Ensure that requirements are properly defined and met
Allocate necessary funding and resources as appropriate
Course correct through out the project
Be the accountable party for the project success or failure
Initiation Phase
Promote the strategic plans and guidance of the Executive Sponsor and Business Process
Owner(s)
Be an advocate for Executive Sponsor and Business Process Owner(s) needs
Obtain additional funding for project when necessary
Establish effective communication about the project with the project team and executive
management
Approve the Project Charter and champion it before the Governance Body at the Project
Commit meeting
Assign Project Manager
Planning Phase
Attend project kick-off meeting.
Participate in planning sessions
Ensure adequate resources are available
Obtain additional funding for project when necessary
Review and approve the detailed Project Plan
Champion the project before the Governance Body at the Plan Commit meeting
Managing Phase
As the project team progresses through Design, Build & Test and Implementation, attend
executive reviews
Help resolve requirements problems.
Help resolve issues, as appropriate
Attend and participate when needed at Project Status Reviews
Champion the project before the Governance Body at the Design and Rollout Reviews
Closeout Phase
Attend Final System Acceptance meeting
Signs-off on project completion
Attend the Lessons Learned meeting; participate in the Post Project Assessment
General Responsibilities
Articulate business goals and organization requirements
Understand the impact the project will have on their organization
Champion the project to provide exposure and buy-in from their organization
Communicate views on project progress and success factors to the Project Sponsor and
other Stakeholders
Initiation Phase
Correctly identify the relevance and value of the project for their organization
Define Business Process Owner requirements
Closeout Phase
Review project outcome to ensure that expectations have been met
Ensure that project deliverables are smoothly integrated into the organization’s ongoing
operations
5. Program Manager
The Program Manager is responsible for the coordinated management of projects that have been defined
as a program in order to gain management advantage over the entire body of work. For this reason the
Program Manager typically does not have a direct role in a single project, but may require a steady
stream of status information about a number of related projects. The Program Manager may make
recommendations to the Governance Body about budget, resources and timing that will benefit the
program as a whole and, in this way, impact specific projects. The responsibilities of the Program
Manager cross project phase boundaries.
General Responsibilities
Monitor all projects in the program to ensure that cross-dependencies are accounted for
and synergies are utilized
Recommend changes to specific projects that will benefit the program as a whole
Initiation Phase
Oversee development of a compelling business case
Ensure active participation and buy-in by the Business Process Owner
Define project success criteria
Document project assumptions and constraints
Conduct cost-benefit analyses
Develop Project Charter
Present the project at a Project Commit meeting
7. Project Manager
The Project Manager has responsibility for the overall project and its successful completion. To succeed
in this responsibility, the Project Manager must work closely with the Project Sponsor to ensure that
adequate resources are applied. The Project Manager also has responsibility for planning and ensuring
that the project is successfully completed on time, within budget, and at an acceptable level of quality.
The Project Manager must be assigned no later than the early Planning phase so that the plan will be
owned by the person responsible for its execution.
General Responsibilities
Implement project policies and procedures
Acquire resources required to perform work
Manage the Project Team
Maintain staff technical proficiency and productivity, and provide training where
required
Maintain excellent communication with all Stakeholders
Establish and maintain quality in the project
Identify and procure tools to be used on the project
Initiation Phase
The Project Manager of the project may or may not be involved during the Initiation Phase. To the
extent that they are, see the Initiating Project Manager role above for details.
Planning Phase
The Project Manager is assigned during the Project Initiation or Planning Phase and may or may not
have completed the initial project scoping. In any event the Project Manager must thoroughly review
all of the materials created or assembled during Initiation.
Develop detailed Project Plan with the assistance of the Project Team, tailoring
methodology to reflect project needs
Create a WBS and an Organizational Breakdown Structure with the assistance of the
Project Team
Develop, or assist in the development of, a Scope Statement, Project Schedule,
Communications Plan, Risk Management Plan, Cost Benefit Analysis, Procurement Plan,
Project Budget, and a Project Transition Checklist
Ensure that management, users, other affected groups in the organization, and contractors
agree to project commitments
Present the project at Plan Commit; obtain Project Plan approval
Baseline the project
Assign resources to project and assign work packages (Resource Plan)
Approve Project Quality Management Approach
Managing Phase
Manage day-to-day tasks and provide direction to team members performing work on the
project
Review regularly the project status, comparing budgeted to actual values
Review regularly the project schedule, comparing baseline schedules to actual work
completed
Ensure that the Project Plan is updated and signed-off as needed
Update budgets and schedules and makes recommendations as needed
Review the results of quality assurance reviews
Participate in Change Control Board to advocate for or against requested changes
Review project risks and establish mitigation procedures
Present the project to the Governance Body at the Design and Rollout Reviews
Closeout Phase
Develop an action plan for any product deficiencies, open issues, etc.
Obtain customer and management approval of completed project
8. Project Team
The Project Team has responsibility for conducting project activities and producing project
deliverables. Project Team members, as necessary, assist the Project Manager in planning the
development effort and help construct commitments to complete the project within established
schedule and budget constraints. The Project Team may include the subject matter experts
responsible for implementing the project solution. Customers and/or Stakeholders should interact
with the Project Team to ensure that requirements are properly understood and implemented.
General Functions
Identify solution alternatives.
Implement solution within budgeted cost and schedule.
Coordinate with quality assurance organization.
Support Project Planning and tracking.
Bring issues or concerns to the Project Manager.
Initiation Phase
Provide estimates for developing products
Ensure that requirements are feasible and appropriate for available resources
Analyze requirements for completeness, consistency, and clarity
Assist in development of the Project Charter
Planning Phase
Develop approach (technical / process / communications) to addressing the problem or
opportunity presented by the project.
Partition and assign development tasks
Assist in development of estimates and schedules
Assist in development of a Quality Assurance Plan
Managing Phase
Create product and process solutions
Track the project execution effort and submit status reports
Conduct internal and external reviews and walkthroughs
Create configuration control and baseline documents
Create testing plan and coordinate test activities
Execute assigned project tasks
Identify problems and schedule fixes
Coordinate with quality assurance, review quality assurance results, and correct any
deviations
Identify and react to risks as they are found
Participate in change reviews
Provide information needed for Design and Rollout Reviews
Closeout Phase
Participate in Final Acceptance meeting, as appropriate
Participate in Lessons Learned meeting
Identify ways to improve project processes
Turn over all project-related documentation to the Project Manager for archiving