Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PRACTICE
5 PRINCIPLES OF
CONSERVATION PRACTICE
Engineering the past to meet the needs of the future
This paper is in a series of information SERVICES COVERED ARE:
Rush lights (made Where the properties of the very rich were concerned
from rush pith)
the existing light fittings were often important in their
Tallow (animal fat) relevance to the building and it history, as well as their
candle
intrinsic value. If expensive mirrored wall sconces and
Gas mantle and silver chandeliers were to survive they had to be adapted
glass shade to the new technology, but for most people new fittings
were purchased to keep ‘up to date’ with the latest
artificial lighting.
By the early twentieth century the cost of electricity
had fallen enabling more of the expanding middle-classes
to install it but usually only into the principal rooms
of their properties.This still left cooking and heating
primarily fuelled by gas and coal. In poorer dwellings
the electric light fittings – if used – were normally much
cheaper and poorly made. As a consequence they
were often scrapped without a second thought and
replacements found as and when needed.This has
Electric lighting is a relatively new component of most resulted in far fewer of these early, inexpensive luminaires
historic buildings’ interiors. Unless the structure dates enduring the passage of time. It was only when the
from the early part of the twentieth century it is most National Grid’s first stage became operational in 1934
likely that it would have previously employed a range that electricity started to become affordable and by the
of alternative forms of lighting from gas mantles to time the grid was nationalised in 1948 the majority of
wax candles and rush lights, even acetylene gas lighting homes were lit by electricity.
enjoyed some popularity with country-houses until
around the 1900’s. Until the 1920’s it would have It took a long time to convince manufacturers that
been unusual to live in a house that was exclusively electricity had a future so very little was done in the
lit by electricity as the costs involved ensured it was way of specific designs for electric lights.The often used
confined to the prosperous upper classes. approach was to adapt designs for gas lights.These were
John Ryland’s John Ryland’s
Library, Manchester Library, Manchester
– office area lighting – surface mounted
consisting of a single wiring distribution
pendant light with system
open glass bowl
often unsuitable as with gas you dealt with a light source The overall cost of installing the new electrical light was
that was upward facing and not downwards as needed relatively high but could, and was, lowered in a number
with electric lamps.The simplest, but not the best, of ways. One such method employed was the way in
solution was to take the design for a gasolier and turn which the dwelling was wired.The costly option was to
the arms upside down or just convert an existing gas try and conceal the cabling in the walls, which entailed
fitting.The alternative option was to start from scratch the channelling of plasterwork and the cost of redecoration.
with the new electric light. Given the poor standard of insulation of early wiring this
was also the hazardous option. It was much safer and
As the new technology was a novelty in its own right, cheaper to install the cabling on the surface and cover
early designers would often deliberately design fittings it with metal or wood casing, a feature that can still be
where the lamps and flexes were on show – see the seen in a number of buildings – see John Ryland’s Library
St Alban the Martyr church example.This style was example.The casing was also often run under the floor
due, in part; to wanting to display the new technology, to route the wiring from room to room. Examples of the
but more practically if the lamps were shaded it would wooden casing were found during the recent rewire of
further reduce their already poor light output. the National Trust’s property – Cragside.
Early lighting systems, as previously stated, were The trunking was usually grooved on the surface; the
expensive. In 1881 carbon filament lamps cost the groves indicating the location of the cabling underneath
then huge sum of 25 shillings each – which could and where it was unsafe to screw fix the lid.
easily have bought a man a new Sunday suit, (decimal
currency = £1.25).
Whatever the situation, it means that chandeliers will Another candidate – which will ultimately be the future
need a suitable replacement light source. Compact of all lighting – is the light emitting diode (LED) version
fluorescent lamps (CFL’s) have been available for many of the ‘candle’ and ‘A-shaped’ lamps, available in a variety
years and initially appear to be an obvious candidate, of colours.This type of lamp has a working life of up to
but even when they have been designed to resemble 30,000 – 50,000 hours (depending upon manufacturers
the incandescent lamps they hope to replace there has data), using about 10 percent of the power of a traditional
been resistance to using them.This apathy is a mixture GLS lamp. Compare the two lamps below; the one the
of a dislike of their aesthetic appearance, the weight left is a clear tungsten halogen IRC coated lamp rated
increase due to their need for control gear and the at 28 watts, the one on the right is LED rated at 1watt,
fact that the lamps contain small amounts of mercury, they both nominally replace a 40 watt incandescent
(although there are disposals systems and legislation in candle lamp.
place to deal with this – see the WEEE directive panel).
They are also more expensive to buy; however in most The Tungsten Halogen lamp can save £75 in energy per
cases they will pay for themselves after about one year year. It produces a sparkly light, slightly whiter light than
due to their substantially lower energy costs. Also the incandescent lamps with technology which runs the
additional advantages of any energy saving lamp are the lamp at a cooler temperature thereby enabling a longer
reduced degradation of the electrical installation and the operating life. Although it will not save you as much
lowered fire risk because of cooler running temperatures. energy, the appearance is very similar to that which they
are replacing.They are ideally suited to fittings where the
There is also another major reason; although the CFL is lamp is exposed, such as crystal chandeliers.
a far more energy efficient lamp the light characteristics
are ‘different’. As a light source they are not as ‘bright
and sparkly’ as the inefficient tungsten GLS. Also they
have poor colour rendering properties, a run-up time Alternatives to GLS Candle Lamps
to full light output in the region of up to 2 minutes and
are generally incompatible with dimmer switches without
appropriate control gear which can increase the overall
cost of the unit.
There are now alternatives to both. One is a tungsten
halogen lamp with an infra-red conserving (IRC) coating
which offers the same sort of light quality as the GLS
but with much improved lamp life of 2000 hours and a
30 per cent increase in efficacy, so a traditional lamp of
60 watts can be replaced with a tungsten halogen lamp
rated at 42 watts; a 25 watt with a 18 watt and so on.
The LED lamp produces less sparkle and gives a cooler St Botolph’s Church
Hardham,
whiter light with different characteristics to incandescent West Sussex –
lamps but of course much longer lamp life and medieval wall
paintings lit with
considerably greater energy savings.There are however LED spotlights and
issues regarding LED’s.They require a cool environment discharge lighting
where they will not over heat, and a mock-up of any
proposed installation is always advised. It should also
be remembered they require control gear or drivers
to operate – so a location for this equipment will also
have to be accommodated within the space, without
embedding it into the fabric with the consequential
fire risk that might bring.
The other considerations that have to be made,
especially when considering alternative lamp use in
a museum / gallery environment, are the undesired
by-products.These can be problems such as infra red
radiation and unsuitable or high operating temperatures,
(although LED’s do not emit any UV or IR). It is
important to consider the effect all of this could have
on delicate paintings and fabrics. It is wise to consult
with manufacturers before installing such low energy
replacements especially where such by-products may
harm the artefacts they are supposed to be illuminating.
Whatever light source is decided upon, be assured, this
is a very swiftly moving area of technical development
and it will not be long before CFL and the LED lamps
have moved on from their present restrictions and
problems into new and more effective and efficient
areas.The present, much loved GLS lamps, took many
decades to reach their present level of maturity but it
will not take more than another for the descendants
of these electric lamps to find theirs.
The future is looking like it will be Organic LED’s
(OLED’s).They are also known as Light Emitting
Polymers (LEP’s) and are composed of a film of emissive
electroluminescent organic compounds.This means they
can be deposited onto a flat surface by a simple “printing”
method.The resulting matrix will then emit light of
differing colours. In other words eventually you will be
able to make any object or surface your light source!
The information in this publication is based on our current knowledge. Whilst every effort has been made to ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ensure the accuracy of the advice given, English Heritage does not accept liability for loss or damage arising English Heritage would like to acknowledge the help of the following in the production of this guide:
from the use of this information.This publication is intended as a general guide and should not be used as a The CIBSE Heritage Group
substitute fro professional advice. John Rylands Library, Manchester
St Alban the Martyr Church, Southampton
The inclusion in this publication of any company, group or individual, or any product or service, should not be St Botolphs Church, Hardham
regarded as either a recommendation or an endorsement by English Heritage or its agents.”
Text by Geraldine O’Farrell – BsEST, Conservation Department EH; front cover image courtesy of CIBSE
Heritage Group; image on top right of page 3 courtesy of Andrew More, English Heritage; image on top left
of page 3 courtesy of Andrew More – English Heritage; image on bottom of page 3 courtesy of Geraldine
O’Farrell – English Heritage; image on page 5 courtesy of Andrew More – English Heritage; image on top
of page 6 courtesy of Caroline Churchill – English Heritage. Images on page 7 courtesy of Alan Weaver,
Crescent Lighting Limited
COMPARISON OF 60W GLS LAMP WITH POTENTIAL RETRO-FITS
Lamp type GLS CFL
Halogen – IRC Halogen LED
Incandescent (Compact
in-GLS (Infra-Red (Lighting-emitting
(General Lighting Fluorescent Lamps)
conserving Coating) Diode)
Service)
Efficacy in lumens 12
50-60
13
22
Differences
per watt and questionable
data from
manufacturers –
figures range
from 28 to 55
English Heritage
(EVO02/10)
Isambard House
Kemble Drive