CAO Motion To Dismiss 14MAR2011

Not
an official court document.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CRIMINAL DIVISION
UNITED STATES, ) Case No.

2011 CMD 1048
Plaintiff, )
vs. )
Theresa S. Cao, )
Alleged Defendant, Sui Juris. )
MOTION TO DISMISS
COMES NOW, by special appearance, without accepting the

jurisdiction of this Court, alleged Defendant, Theresa S. Cao,
a living, breathing, flesh and blood, sovereign woman on the
land, an American Citizen and District of Columbia Citizen,
with and claiming all her inherent, unlimited, unalienable
Constitutionally guaranteed Rights, secured for her by the
federal and state Constitutions, with her name properly
spelled only in upper and lower case letters, and who hereby
respectfully moves this Honorable Court to dismiss the
captioned case on the following lawfully based grounds:
[Reference # 1 to # 4 below and following Exhibits Listed, A
to Z, ONE to TWENTY-FIVE]
In addition, I’m filing this motion unrepresented by this

court appointed attorney, Attorney April L. Downs, as she
has not upheld her Constitutional oath to assist me with my
case. Counsel of record withheld from me vital information
1 Taken from “THE SEASON FOR TREASON”, The Post and email, 16 March 2011
Not an official court document.
pertinent to my defense and misrepresented to me vital

information pertinent to my defense, based on the following
reasons but not all inclusive: I specifically asked Attorney
Downs to research information, which I requested over one
month ago in which she failed to obtain on my behalf and in
addition, Attorney Downs has purposefully not been
forthright with the Plea Deals/Offers made to me by the
Prosecution, namely not indicating to me that both the “Stet”
Docket and the “FTO” aka. First Time Offender, is one in the
same Plea Offers/Deals, made by the Prosecution.
I hereby dismiss Attorney April L. Downs as my Public

Defender. WHEREFORE, alleged Defendant respectfully
moves this Honorable Court to grant the request for a new
appointed Public Defender, who will assist me in my
defense, as I am guaranteed the right of counsel, as affirmed
in the 6th Amendment, the Bill of Rights, of the Constitution
of the U.S.
1. Amendment I [The First Amendment] of the Bill of Rights,

of the Constitution of the U.S.A, declares “Congress shall
make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances.”
I committed no crime, since I was simply exercising my right

of free speech and to petition the Government for a redress
of grievances.
My “intent” in attending the historical first-time reading of

the Constitution of the U.S., in the U.S. House of
Representatives, House Floor, was to witness the newly
installed 112th Congress, as of January 5, 2011, to commence
to uphold and defend the Constitution of the U.S., as the
New Speaker of the House, John Boehner, and Members of
Congress, affirmed in there sworn “Oath of Office”.
[Reference: Exhibits J, L]
In addition, the Express, a publication of the Washington

Post, dated 12.30.2010, story headline: “GOP’s New S.O.P.
[Standard Operating Procedure] As they take charge of the
House, Republicans plan to put a new focus on the
Constitution” cites Incoming Speaker of the House John
Boehner: “We always hear members of Congress talking
about swearing an oath to represent their constituents when
in reality the only oath we take is to the Constitution.”
Adding, “We pledge ‘to support and defend the
Constitution of the United States.’ No more, no less.”
[Reference: Exhibit K]
I arrived at the U.S. Capitol House Gallery, ~10:30am, with

the reading of the Constitution of the U.S. commencing
~11am. The people in the House Gallery, including myself,
were asked to leave, after the initial round of seating
sequence, so as to permit other people to have their turn in
the Gallery; we were also informed that we could line up
once again and return to the House Gallery. I returned to

the House Gallery for a second time, but do not recall the
time frame; I believe the Congressmen were reading ~ the
latter portion of Article I, of the Constitution of the U.S.
Hence, I did not know that I was going to be present at the
reading of Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the U.S.
Because Commander Fitzpatrick’s complaint naming Obama
in Commission of the Crime of Treason, on March 17, 2009,
remains unanswered, I was forced to act. Mr. Obama admits
his Treason by way of his silence; silence is agreement.
Colonel Lakin was forced to act for the same reason. Mr.
Obama tacitly admits his Treason.
Obama’s success to install the military police to replace

civilian policemen is ongoing, and is an act of Treason.
I’ve been forced to act through the failure of law

enforcement officials and all other government officials in
positions of authority, who failed to defend and uphold the
Constitution of the U.S., specifically, Article II, Section 1, the
Natural Born Citizen clause. This is the reason I stand
before the court today.
I spoke on the spur of the moment, as an American Citizen,

to defend God, Country and the Constitution of the United
States and my “intent” was not to “disrupt”, but rather to
publicly announce Obama’s Treason, on January 6, 2011.
Had this question been reconciled on March 17, 2009, nearly
two years ago, neither myself nor Colonel Lakin, would
have been forced to act. [Exhibit V, W, X, Y, Z, Exhibit ONE,

TWO]
2. Amendment IV [The Fourth Amendment] of the Bill of
Rights, of the Constitution of the U.S.A., declares “The right
of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not
be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable
cause, supported by oath of affirmation, and particularly
describing the place to be searched, and the persons or
things to be seized.”
Further, no one allegedly injured by my alleged actions

made a written complaint against me; therefore, I was
unlawfully arrested, which is a violation of the Fourth
Amendment.
3. Amendment V [The Fifth Amendment] of the Bill of

Rights, of the Constitution of the U.S.A., declares, “No
person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a
grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces,
or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or
public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same
offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall
be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against
himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without
due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for
public use, without just compensation.”
The arrest deprived me of due process rights secured in the

Fifth Amendment, since I was deprived of my liberty
without Constitutionally compliant due process of law.
4. Amendment VI [The Sixth Amendment] of the Bill of

Rights, of the Constitution of the U.S.A., declares, “In all
criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a
speedy trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district
wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district
shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be
informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be
confronted with witnesses against him; to have compulsory
process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the
assistance of counsel for his defense.”
Still further, I have the Sixth Amendment right to confront

my accuser, but since there is no accuser, since no complaint
was filed against me, these charges are bogus and
fraudulent, and do not meet Constitutional mandates, thus,
must be dismissed.
The Sixth Amendment also guarantees my right to know the

nature and cause of the accusations alleged against me.
Again, since no valid complaint was filed by an alleged
injured party, I was deprived of this right also, and was
denied the right to face my accuser. Since there is no lawful
accuser, I cannot face a fictitious accuser, thus again, the
charges alleged are bogus and fraudulent.
In summary, I spoke on the spur of the moment, as an

American Citizen, to defend God, Country and the
Constitution of the United States and meant no “intent” to
disrupt Congress on January 6, 2011.
I am guaranteed all rights of the Declaration of

Independence, the Constitution of the U.S., as affirmed in all
the Amendments of the Bill of Rights.
Reference: Exhibits A to Z, Exhibits ONE to TWENTY-FIVE.

Exhibit A. [Copies of my Mini-Hardcopy Book References:
Declaration of Independence, circa 1776 / Constitution of
the U.S.A., circa 1787 / Bill of Rights, circa 1789, specifically
Amendment I – Amendment X aka. First Amendment –
Tenth Amendment / Copyright, National Archives
Museum, Washington, D.C.]
Exhibit B. [Copies and Transcripts of my Book References:

Bill of Rights from Exhibit A, “James Madison proposes the
Bill of Rights to the House of Representatives”, circa June 8,
1789]
Exhibit C. [The Charters of Freedom: Authentic

Reproductions on Antiqued Parchment: The Declaration of
Independence, circa 1776 / Constitution of the U.S.A., circa
1787 / Bill of Rights, circa 1789, specifically Amendment I –
Amendment X aka. First Amendment – Tenth Amendment /
Copyright, National Archives Experience, National Archives
Exhibit D. [Copy of the Visitor’s Guide: National Archives

Experience / Rotunda for the Charters for Freedom: “The
Declaration of Independence”, circa, 1776, The “Constitution
of the United States”, circa 1787, “The Bill of Rights”, circa
1789, “Magna Carta”, circa 1297]: View one of the most
important documents in the history of democracy. In 1215,
when King John confirmed Magna Carta with his seal, he
was acknowledging the now firmly embedded concept that
no man – not even king – is above the law. The charter

established important individual rights that have a direct
legacy in the American “Bill of Rights.”]
Exhibit E. [“The Magna Carta”: Sotheby’s New York,

December 18, 2007 / circa 1297 / National Archives
Exhibit F. [Copy of the pocket-sized, Constitution of the

United States and the Declaration of Independence, by the
United States Senate, 111th Congress, 1st Session, July 29,
2009 / These booklets are available for staffers and
constituents in the Senate Office Buildings]
Exhibit G. [Copy of “Law of Nations” circa 1759, 1787, 1792,

etal. Vattel, Emer de / 31-Library of Congress Online
Catalog Listing / Book 1, Chapter XIX, Sec.212: The natives,
or Natural-Born Citizens, are those born in the country, of
parents who are citizens…The country of the fathers is
therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens
merely by their tacit consent.]
Exhibit H. [Copies of “Law of Nations”, Vattel, Emer de /

from various sources noted in Library of Congress Book
Requests, dated March 11, 2011 / Book 1, Chapter XIX,
Sec.212: The natives, or Natural-Born Citizens, are those
born in the country, of parents who are citizens…The
country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and
these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.]
Exhibit I. [1-page Document/Article “But ‘Natural Born’ is

not defined in the Constitution? Yes it is!” dated December
13-15, 2010 by Ltc. Eldon Bell, Retired Military
Doctor/Officer of the Armed Forces of the United States of
America states: The Constitution and Emmerich De Vattel’s
LAW OF NATIONS has the answer to any questions
regarding citizenship abroad and any laws crossing national
boundaries: Excerpt 1: Constitution of the U.S., Article II,
Sec. 1 & Excerpt 2: De Vattel’s LAW OF NATIONS, circa 1758
Book 1, Chapter XIX, Sec.212]
Exhibit J. [Original, The Washington Post, dated January 7,

2011, story headline: “‘TO FORM A MORE PERFECT
UNION,’ BUT READING SPARKS SOME DIVISION”; ‘We
the People,’ the abridged version: New Speaker John A.
Boehner led more than 130 fellow lawmakers in a recitation
of a slightly shortened edition of the Constitution on
Thursday. A few passages and their readers: FIRST
AMENDMENT, GABRIELLE GIFFORDS [D-Ariz.], as noted
in #1]
Exhibit K. [Copy of the Express, a publication of the

Washington Post, dated 12.30 2010, story headline: “GOP’s
New S.O.P. As they take charge of the House, Republicans
plan to put a new focus on the Constitution” cites Incoming
Speaker of the House John Boehner: “We always hear
members of Congress talking about swearing an oath to
represent their constituents when in reality the only oath we
take is to the Constitution.” Adding, “We pledge ‘to support

and defend the Constitution of the United States.’ No more,
no less.”
Exhibit L. [Reference: youtube.com Videos from Swearing in

Ceremony & Commencement of 112th Congress, on January
5, 2011 and the Reading of the Constitution of the U.S.A., at
the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2011 / Reference: Oath of
Office, Exhibit N]
Exhibit M. [Reference: youtube.com: cspan.com “Birther

Arrested during House Reading of the Constitution –
1/6/2011 / youtube.com: birtherreportdotcom, 1/6/2011 /
etal.]
Exhibit N. [Document/Article: “How Will Turmoil in the

Middle East be resolved?” dated February 6, 2011 by Major
General Paul E. Vallely / thepostemail.com / “The Oath is
Simple and Reads: “I DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT I
WILL SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF
THE UNITED STATES AGAINST ALL ENEMIES,
FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC, THAT I WILL BEAR TRUE
FAITH AND ALLEGIANCE TO THE SAME, THAT I TAKE
THIS OBLIGATION FREELY WITHOUT MENTAL
RESERVATION OR PURPOSE OF EVASION, AND THAT I
WILL FAITHFULLY DISCHARGE THE DUTIES OF THE
OFFICE ON WHICH I AM ABOUT TO ENTER: SO HELP
ME GOD.””
Exhibit O. [Website Reference: citizensoftheconstitution.com

/ Margy and Jack Flynn]
Exhibit P. [Website/Book Reference: “Sui Juris: The Truth in

Record, A Process for the People to Access the Courts by
Pamela & Will Gaston / avoiceforchildren.com]
Exhibit Q. [Document: “Supreme Court Oath Taking

Procedures”, Supreme Court / Office of the Curator / Public
Information Office / Updated: 07.23.2009 / SCOTUS /
Washington, D.C. 20543 / 202.479.3211]
Exhibit R. [Article: “Supreme Court: A to Z” / American

Government A to Z Series / Fourth Edition / Kenneth Jost /
CQ Press / pp. 310 / Specifies both “Constitutional” and
“Judiciary Act of 1789” Oaths of Office]
Exhibit S. [Sworn “Oath of Office” of POTUS / President of

the United States / To be Obtained from Library of
Congress]
Exhibit T. [Article/Statement: from Paul E. Vallely, MG, US

Army [Ret.], Chairman – Stand Up America, dated March
13, 2011, for Theresa S. Cao]
Exhibit U. [Document/Article: The “Battle for Our

America” Series – Part One dated March 10, 2011 by Paul E.
Vallely, MG, US Army [Ret.], Chairman – Stand Up America
/ standupamericaus.com]
Exhibit V. [Document/Article: “Two-Year-Old Treason

Complaint against Obama has Never Been Answered: It’s
Going to Take Large Numbers of People”, dated March 11,
2011 / thepostemail.com / Reference: LCDR Walter Francis
Fitzpatrick III, United States Navy Retired /
thejaghunter.wordpress.com]
Exhibit W. [Document/Article: “Treason: Two-years and

Counting, 3.318 Unanswered Criminal Complaints Naming
Obama in Commission of Treason! What Are You Prepared
to Do?” / thepostemail.com / thejaghunter.wordpress.com
/ Reference: Exhibit Above.]
Exhibit X. [Document/Article: “Criminal Allegations

Regarding the Commission of Treason, dated March 17, 2009
/ thejaghunter.wordpress.com / LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick,
III, United States Navy Retired]
Exhibit Y. [Document/Article: “Treason is Destroying

America…As Obama Always Intended!” dated February 25,
2011 / thejaghunter.wordpress.com / LCDR Walter
Fitzpatrick, III, United States Navy Retired]
Exhibit Z. [Document/Article: “Has Monroe County

Admitted to Violating the Law?: The Judge Can Pick the
Foreperson from Wherever They Choose” dated February
25, 2011 / thepostemail.com / thejaghunter.wordpress.com]
Exhibit ONE. [Document/Article: “Our Grand Juries Have

Been Taken Away: So Let’s Take Them Back” dated January
23, 2011 / thepostemail.com / thejaghunter.wordpress.com
/ LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, III, United States Navy Retired]
Exhibit TWO. [Document/Article: “Operation American

Freedom” dated October 14, 2009 /
thejaghunter.wordpress.com / LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, III,
United States Navy Retired]
Exhibit THREE. [Document/Article: “Since When is

Treason a “Diversion?: Entrenched Politicians Ignore and
Commit Treason Against the U.S. Constitution”” dated
March 11, 2011 by Neil Turner / thepostemail.com]
Exhibit FOUR. [Copy Nuremberg Defense: Principle IV /

Safeguard Our Constitution, SafeguardOurConstitution.com
/ “The Case Against Ltc. Lakin” states: Since the Nuremberg
trials after World War II, the Principles espoused at
Nuremberg disallowed military officers from using the
defense of “following orders.”* From 1946 onward, military
officers had a positive duty to establish the lawfulness of
their orders and are informed of their “duty to disobey.”
*Principle IV]
Exhibit FIVE. [2-page Document/Article: “Shariah Law vs.

the Constitution”, dated March 3, 2011 from “Shariah: The
Threat to America” or free download at
shariahthethreat.com]
Exhibit SIX. [Copy from Headline story from American

Thinker / hillbuzz.org / Pamela Geller of atlasshrugs.com
who broke the story on FEB 20, 2011, entitled: “AMERICAN
BAR ASSOCIATION IS FIGHTING FOR SHARIA LAW IN
THE U.S.”
Exhibit SEVEN. [Copy of Headline story from Daily Mail

Reporter, dated February 20, 2011, entitled: “EXTREMIST
CLERIC TO LEAD WHITE HOUSE PROTEST CALLING
FOR MUSLIMS TO ‘RISE UP AND ESTABLISH ISLAMIC
STATE IN AMERICA’, British extremist Anjem Choudary –
who once said ‘the flag of Islam will fly over the White
House’ – has announced he will lead a demonstration calling
on Muslims to establish Shariah law across America”]
Exhibit EIGHT. [Article Headline story by Michael Carl

dated March 5, 2011 / worldnetdaily.com / Related to
Exhibit SEVEN / Quotes from Pastor Terry Jones and Frank

Gaffney indicating Shariah Law vs. Constitutional U.S. and
the threat of Shariah Law to America’s Republic.
Exhibit NINE. [Copy of Headline story from

citizenwarrior.com, dated February 2011, entitled:
“SHARIAH FINANCE WATCH HAS LIST OF SHARIAH
COMPLIANT BANKS”, According to Shariah Finance
Watch…there are two reasons to boycott such banks: First of
all, Sharia compliant banks are required to donate two
percent of their profits to Muslim “charities,” which are

often jihad-related groups, because of course, jihad is an
inextricable part of Islamic doctrine. Secondly, the
widespread existence of such policies at banks ostensibly
legitimizes Sharia law – a backward, misogynistic,
intolerant, totalitarian form of law that has no place in the
modern world.]
Exhibit TEN. [Copy of Headline story from

worldnetdaily.com, dated December 2008] “SHARIAH
FINANCE 101 TAUGHT AT THE TREASURY
DEPARTMENT”
Exhibit ELEVEN: [Article “Peter King to Proceed with

Muslim Radicalization Hearings” dated March 6, 2011 /
centrepointnews.com / dailymail.co.uk]
Exhibit TWELVE. [Copy of Headline story from

worldnetdaily.com, dated November 8, 2010, “CONGRESS
REPORT CONCEDES OBAMA ELIGIBILITY UNVETTED:
‘THERE IS NO SPECIFIC FEDERAL AGENCY’ TO REVIEW
CANDIDATES FOR FEDERAL OFFICE”]
Exhibit THIRTEEN. [Copy of Headline story from

worldnetdaily.com, dated December 29, 2010, “‘WE NO
LONGER HAVE A REPUBLIC SUBSERVIENT TO
CONSTITUTION’, OFFICER: LAKIN CASE IS END OF
‘RULE OF LAW’ / See full Post & Email interview]
Exhibit FOURTEEN. [Copy of Headline story from

worldnetdaily.com, dated December 20, 2010, “ARMY
‘BIRTHER’ JAILED AT LEAVENWORTH: SUPPORTERS
RALLY AROUND DOCTOR WHO CHALLENGED
OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY”]
Exhibit FIFTEEN. [Copy of Headline story from

worldnetdaily.com, dated December 16, 2010, “LAKIN
SENTENCED: DISMISSAL, 6 MONTHS, DOUBTS ABOUT
OBAMA’S INELIGIBILITY NO EXCUSE FOR DISOBEYING
ORDER”]
Exhibit SIXTEEN. [Copy of Headline story from

worldnetdaily.com, dated December 11, 2010,
“MCINERNEY: CONGRESS WILL REVIEW LAKIN CASE,
3-STAR GENERAL WARNS: PHYSICIAN ‘IS NOT GOING
TO GET A FAIR TRIAL’”]
Exhibit SEVENTEEN. [Copy of Headline story from

worldnetdaily.com, dated December 2, 2010, “LAKIN’S
ATTORNEY: CONVICTION ‘CERTAIN’, ‘HE’S VERY
DISAPPOINTED IN MILITARY JUSTICE SYSTEM’”]
Exhibit EIGHTEEN. [Copy of Headline story from

worldnetdaily.com, dated, February 4, 2010, “OBAMA’S
PRAYER: ‘DON’T QUESTION MY CITIZENSHIP’, RAISES
ISSUE OF ELIGIBILITY IN SPEECH AT ANNUAL
BREAKFAST GATHERING”]
Exhibit NINETEEN. [Copy of Headline story from

worldnetdaily.com, dated, February 6, 2010,
“‘GOVERNMENT WANTS TO BE YOUR ONE AND ONLY
GOD’, FARAH: TEA PARTY’S SUCCESS ONLY
MEASURED BY RECLAIMING NATION’S CULTURAL
INSTITUTIONS”]
Exhibit TWENTY. [Copy of Headline story from

worldnetdaily.com, dated, February 23, 2010, “WHITE
HOUSE ‘ON BOARD’ PALESTINIAN UNILATERAL
STATEHOOD THREAT, U.N. WOULD RECOGNIZE NEW
NATION OUTSIDE OF NEGOTIATIONS WITH ISRAEL”]
Exhibit TWENTY-ONE. [Document / Liberty Counsel:

“Right Wing Extremist Card” citing “U.S. DEPARTMENT
OF HOMELAND SECURITY / DHS / Describing “RIGHT-
WING EXTREMIST” as “Domestic Terrorists”]
Exhibit TWENTY-TWO. [Book Reference: “In the Name of

God. Amen: Rediscovering Biblical and Historic Covenants
/ Daniel J. Ford / copyright 2003]
Exhibit TWENTY-THREE. [Book Reference: “The United

States Constitution: What It Says, What It Means / National
Archive Museum / Washington, D.C.]
Exhibit TWENTY-FOUR. [Book Reference: “The Freedom

Wars: What You Can Do To Preserve Your Rights” by John
Whitehead / Founder of Rutherford Institute /
rutherfordinstitute.org]
Exhibit TWENTY-FIVE. [Book Reference: “Do You Know

the Bill of Rights: A Complete Guide” / by Rutherford
Institute / Reference: Exhibit TWENTY-FOUR]
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing valid, lawfully based

reasons, alleged Defendant respectfully requests this
Honorable Court to dismiss this case in its entirety, with
prejudice.
Respectfully submitted,
All Rights Reserved
___________________________
Name: Theresa S. Cao
Street Address: 400 Mass. Ave. N.W., Unit #1003
City, State: Washington, D.C. 20001
Telephone: 202.556.6007
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Theresa S. Cao, hereby certify that a true and correct copy
of the foregoing Motion to Dismiss, was hand delivered on
March 14, 2011, to the prosecuting attorney, Mr. Ronald C.
Machen, at the following address:
Name of Attorney: Ronald C. Machen Jr.

Office Name: U.S. Department of Justice / U.S. Attorney /
District of Columbia
Street Address: Judiciary Center / 555 Fourth Street, N.W.
City, State, zip: Washington, D.C. 20530

All Rights Reserved,
___________________________
Theresa S. Cao, American Citizen
EXHIBIT B
Exhibit B. [Copies and Transcript of my Book References of

the Bill of Rights, “JAMES MADISON PROPOSES THE BILL
OF RIGHTS TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES”] The
Amendments which have occurred to me, proper to be
recommended by congress, to the state legislatures are these:
FIRST. That there be prefixed to the constitution a

declaration – That all power is originally vested in, and
consequently derived from the people. That government is
instituted, and ought to be exercised for the benefit of the
people; which consists in the enjoyment of life and liberty,
with the right of acquiring and using property, and
generally of pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.
THAT THE PEOPLE HAVE AN INDUBITABLE,

UNALIENABLE, AND INDEFEASIBLE RIGHT TO
REFORM OR CHANGE THEIR GOVERNMENT,
WHENEVER IT BE FOUND ADVERSE OR INADEQUATE
TO THE PURPOSES OF ITS INSTITUTION. FOURTHLY.
THE PEOPLE SHALL NOT BE DEPRIVED OR ABRIDGED
OF THEIR RIGHT TO SPEAK, TO WRITE, OR TO PUBLISH
THEIR SENTIMENTS; AND THE FREEDOM OF THE
PRESS, AS ONE OF THE GREAT BULWARKS OF LIBERTY,
SHALL BE INVIOLABLE.
THE PEOPLE SHALL NOT BE RESTRAINED FROM
PEACEABLY ASSEMBLING AND CONSULTING FOR

THEIR COMMON GOOD, NOR FROM APPLYING TO
THE LEGISLATURE BY PETITIONS, OR
REMONSTRANCES FOR REDRESS OF THEIR
GRIEVANCES.
NO PERSON SHALL BE SUBJECT…NOR BE DEPRIVED

OF LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE
PROCESS OF LAW…
THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE TO BE SECURED IN THEIR

PERSONS, THEIR HOUSES, THEIR PAPERS, AND THEIR
OTHER PROPERTY FORM ALL UNREASONABLE
SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED
BY WARRANTS ISSUED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE,
SUPPORTED BY OATHS OF AFFIRMATION, OR NOT
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBING THE PLACES TO BE
SEARCHED, OR THE PERSONS OR THINGS TO BE
SEIZED. [Approximately 6-10 Peace/Shalom Activism
Posters and 1-book manuscript? are reported stolen to my
Condo Concierge Director]
IN ALL CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS, THE ACCUSED

SHALL ENJOY THE RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL, TO BE
INFORMED OF THE CAUSE AND NATURE OF THE
ACCUSATION, TO BE CONFRONTED WITH HIS
ACCUSERS, AND THE WITNESSES AGAINST HIM; TO
HAVE A COMPULSORY PROCESS FOR OBTAINING
WITNESSES IN HIS FAVOR; AND TO HAVE THE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR HIS DEFENSE.
THE EXCEPTIONS HERE OR ELSEWHERE IN THE

CONSTITUTION, MADE IN FAVOR OF PARTICULAR
RIGHT,S SHALL NOT BE SO CONSTRUED AS TO
DIMINISH THE JUST IMPORTANCEOF OTHER RIGHTS
RETAINED BY THE PEOPLE…

CRIMINAL DIVISION
UNITED STATES, ) Case No.

2011 CMD 1048
Plaintiff, )
Vs. )
Theresa S. Cao, )
Alleged Defendant. )
MOTION TO CLAIM AND EXERCISE

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
COMES NOW Theresa S. Cao, alleged Defendant, sui juris, a

living, breathing, American Citizen, who claims and
exercises all inherent, unlimited, unalienable
Constitutionally guaranteed Rights, and whose name is
properly spelled only in upper and lower case letters, who,
now, will accept this Court’s jurisdiction, based on the
following valid reasons:
1. I am guaranteed all rights of the Constitution of the U.S.,

affirmed in all the Amendments of the Bill of Rights. See:
Exhibit B. (Book References for the Constitution of the
U.S.A., Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence,
Copyright, National Archives Museum, Washington, D.C.)
2. I am guaranteed all rights aforementioned, based on …
3.
WHEREFORE, alleged Defendant respectfully moves this

Honorable Court to grant the requested Motion to Claim
and Exercise Constitutional Rights aforementioned, valid
lawfully based reasons.
All Rights Reserved
___________________________
Name: Theresa S. Cao
Telephone: 202.556.6007

of the foregoing Motion, was sent by first class U.S. Mail,
postage prepaid, or hand delivered on this ….day of March,
2011, to the prosecuting attorney, as follows:
___________________________

CRIMINAL DIVISION
Theresa S. Cao ) Case No.

2011 CMD 1048
)
vs. )
) DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION
UNITED STATES, et. al. ) OF
DOCUMENTS
MOTION FOR DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY / FOIA

REQUEST FROM MY RECORDS
COMES NOW Theresa S. Cao, sui juris, a living, breathing,

American Citizen, who claims and exercises all inherent,
unlimited, unalienable Constitutionally guaranteed Rights,
and whose name is properly spelled only in upper and
lower case letters, who, now, and demands PRODUCTION
OF DOCUMENTS necessary to my defense.
ALL questions are to be answered and all discovery

completed before upcoming hearing in the Superior Court of
the District of Columbia, the next hearing set for March 15,
2011. All parties are going to be called as witnesses, will be
cross examined and shall disclose fully and completely the
information demanded.
All records herein requested are to be brought forth in a

timely manner by all parties and discovery shall be
completed before TRIAL can proceed. Many records
requested contain EXCULPATROY EVIDENCE, necessary to
my defense and for impeachment of witnesses. Any
requested records that are withheld will be criminal
obstruction of justice and withholding of evidence, and all
parties are being held accountable in the Superior Court of
the District of Columbia, Case No. 2011 CMD 1048.
In addition to the records listed in the attached FREEDOM

OF INFORMATION/PRIVACY ACT demand….
All records are discoverable not only under the

FOIA/PRIVACY ACT and all information is critical to the
public knowledge of the methods and operations of
government agencies.
Any hearings or trials held before discovery is completed by

all parties will be a violation of my civil rights and liberties
of due process, and all parties shall be held accountable.
Parties specifically named are in bold type and are all being
INDIVIDUALLY SERVED, as well as those named in the
body of the FOIA DEMAND AND ADDENDUM. All
parties are expected to read the entire document and
produce records that apply to them wherein demanded.
1. The PROSECUTOR, shall produce a complete witness
list, and complete information disclosing the intended

testimony of each witness; also the relevance and purpose of
each witnesses testimony that they are going to call. I expect
an accurate list that will not be changed many times before
trial, as in past proceedings. I expect this information in a
timely manner, at least TEN DAYS before any trial in the
Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
2. The COURT, shall produce records from every hearing in

Case No. 2011 CMD 1048. All court AUDIO and
VIDEOTAPES, transcripts and exhibits shall be produced
before hearings or trials.
3. The U.S. CAPITOL POLICE, ………. involved with Case

No. 2011 CMD 1048…
4. The SECRET SERVICE & all FEDERAL

AGENTS….involved with Case No. 2011 CMD 1048
5. The LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT,

specifically CHAIRMAN….MAJ. HOUSE LEADER, JOHN
BOEHNER, REP. JOHN…GOODLATTE, FROM NEW
JERSEY and the 112TH CONGRESS, shall produce records
of their SWORN OATHS/AFFIDAVITS OF OFFICE BASED
ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE U.S.
6. The JUDICAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT,

specifically CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS, & ERIC
HOLDER, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, shall produce
records of their SWORN OATHS/AFFIDAVITS?? OF

OFFICE BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE U.S.
7. The EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT,

specifically BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and JOE BIDEN,
shall produce records of their SWORN
OATHS/AFFIDAVITS OF OFFICE BASED ON THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE U.S.
ALL DISCOVERY SHALL BE PRODUCED IN A TIMELY
MANNER BEFORE UPCOMING HEARINGS IN THE
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
All Rights Reserved
___________________________
Name: Theresa S. Cao, sui juris
DATE:
Telephone: 202.556.6007
Copies attached to Case No. 2011 CMD 1048
and served on all parties named in attached
certificate of service.
of the foregoing Motion, was sent by first class U.S. Mail,
postage prepaid, or hand delivered on this ….day of March,
2011, to the prosecuting attorney, as follows:

___________________________

CAO Motion To Dismiss 14MAR2011

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

CAO Motion To Dismiss 14MAR2011

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Not

an official court document.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES, ) Case No.

COMES NOW, by special appearance, without accepting the

In addition, I’m filing this motion unrepresented by this

pertinent to my defense and misrepresented to me vital

I hereby dismiss Attorney April L. Downs as my Public

1. Amendment I [The First Amendment] of the Bill of Rights,

I committed no crime, since I was simply exercising my right

My “intent” in attending the historical first-time reading of

In addition, the Express, a publication of the Washington

I arrived at the U.S. Capitol House Gallery, ~10:30am, with

once again and return to the House Gallery. I returned to

Obama’s success to install the military police to replace

I’ve been forced to act through the failure of law

I spoke on the spur of the moment, as an American Citizen,

have been forced to act. [Exhibit V, W, X, Y, Z, Exhibit ONE,

Further, no one allegedly injured by my alleged actions

3. Amendment V [The Fifth Amendment] of the Bill of

The arrest deprived me of due process rights secured in the

4. Amendment VI [The Sixth Amendment] of the Bill of

Still further, I have the Sixth Amendment right to confront

The Sixth Amendment also guarantees my right to know the

In summary, I spoke on the spur of the moment, as an

I am guaranteed all rights of the Declaration of

Reference: Exhibits A to Z, Exhibits ONE to TWENTY-FIVE.

Exhibit B. [Copies and Transcripts of my Book References:

Exhibit C. [The Charters of Freedom: Authentic

Exhibit D. [Copy of the Visitor’s Guide: National Archives

no man – not even king – is above the law. The charter

Exhibit E. [“The Magna Carta”: Sotheby’s New York,

Exhibit F. [Copy of the pocket-sized, Constitution of the

Exhibit G. [Copy of “Law of Nations” circa 1759, 1787, 1792,

Exhibit H. [Copies of “Law of Nations”, Vattel, Emer de /

Exhibit I. [1-page Document/Article “But ‘Natural Born’ is

Exhibit J. [Original, The Washington Post, dated January 7,

Exhibit K. [Copy of the Express, a publication of the

take is to the Constitution.” Adding, “We pledge ‘to support

Exhibit L. [Reference: youtube.com Videos from Swearing in

Exhibit M. [Reference: youtube.com: cspan.com “Birther

Exhibit N. [Document/Article: “How Will Turmoil in the

Exhibit O. [Website Reference: citizensoftheconstitution.com

Exhibit P. [Website/Book Reference: “Sui Juris: The Truth in

Exhibit Q. [Document: “Supreme Court Oath Taking

Exhibit R. [Article: “Supreme Court: A to Z” / American

Exhibit S. [Sworn “Oath of Office” of POTUS / President of

Exhibit T. [Article/Statement: from Paul E. Vallely, MG, US

Exhibit U. [Document/Article: The “Battle for Our

Exhibit V. [Document/Article: “Two-Year-Old Treason

Exhibit W. [Document/Article: “Treason: Two-years and

Exhibit X. [Document/Article: “Criminal Allegations

Exhibit Y. [Document/Article: “Treason is Destroying

Exhibit Z. [Document/Article: “Has Monroe County

Exhibit ONE. [Document/Article: “Our Grand Juries Have

Exhibit TWO. [Document/Article: “Operation American

Exhibit THREE. [Document/Article: “Since When is

Exhibit FOUR. [Copy Nuremberg Defense: Principle IV /

Exhibit FIVE. [2-page Document/Article: “Shariah Law vs.

Exhibit SIX. [Copy from Headline story from American

Exhibit SEVEN. [Copy of Headline story from Daily Mail

Exhibit EIGHT. [Article Headline story by Michael Carl

Exhibit SEVEN / Quotes from Pastor Terry Jones and Frank