TALMUDIC LOGIC FOR BEGINNERS

BY GILAD ATZMON

It is possible that when they circumcised Alan Dershowitz, they

binned the wrong bit. Following the recent devastating chain of
nuclear disasters in Japan, the lame Zionist advocate has
managed to draw the most astonishing conclusion: “Israel Has
the Right to Attack Iran's Nuclear Reactors Now”

Here is Dershowitz’ fascinating, logical, algorithm for us to

consider:

1. “The recent disaster in Japan has shown the world the

extraordinary dangers posed by nuclear radiation”

2. “If Iran were to develop nuclear weapons, the next ship

destined to Gaza might contain a nuclear dirty bomb”

3 “A dirty bomb detonated in tiny Israel would cause incalculable

damage to civilian life.”

Dershowitz is obviously a complete ignorant -- a ‘nuclear dirty

bomb’ is not exactly something you blithely throw over the
fence onto your next-door neighbour: the Palestinians in Gaza
do not need a ‘dirty bomb,’ and have never expressed any desire
to have one. All they want is their land back. And they would be
the last to radioactively contaminate their beloved soil.
However, unlike the Jewish state that possesses hundreds of
nuclear bombs and have also been using WMD against civilians,
no one has managed to prove that Iran plans to produce an
atomic bomb, or any other weapons of mass destruction. [1]

“Israel” says Dershowitz, “has the right to prevent its civilians

from being murdered by Iranian weapons, especially weapons of
mass destruction.”

Yet, if Dershowitz’ logic is valid and consistent, then surely

every Arab and Muslim country in the world should also have
the right to prevent its own civilians from being murdered by
Israel’s weapons of mass destruction.

And if Paul Wolfowitz is also correct, the Jewish state would have
‘no legal standing to protest a surgical attack on its nuclear
facilities’, for Israel is a volatile nuclear super power that so far
has refused to sign any non-proliferation of nuclear weapons
treaty.

In his absurd piece, war enthusiast Dershowitz pretends to

present reasonable argument: he says “this is not to say that
Israel should attack Iran's nuclear reactors now. That it has the
right to do so does not mean that it should not wait for a more
opportune time …But under no circumstances should the
military option ever be taken off the table. Israel must preserve
its ability to exercise its fundamental right of preventive self
defense.”

And what about the rest of us Mr. Dershowitz? Do we also have

the right of ‘self-defense’?
I think that the message is clear. The time is ripe to defend the
rest of humanity from the Jewish State and its poisonous
messengers. Zionist advocates like Dershowitz should, once and
for all, be seen for what they really are, and rejected by our
society and academia.

Similarly, Israel must be stripped of its nuclear capacity and

military might. The Jewish state must be dismantled, before it is
too late.

And a No Fly Zone over Gaza and the West Bank is long overdue.

[1] In the past I expressed the idea that an Iranian bomb would
be a desirable step towards peace. It could only deter Israel from
celebrating its murderous symptoms.

http://www.gilad.co.uk/