Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
MB04-304
1,2
Dhruv Tapasvi, 1Dennis Wiesenborn and 2Cole Gustafson
1
Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
2
Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics
North Dakota State University
Fargo, ND 58105
Abstract.
A biodiesel process model was developed by incorporating the process-engineering
principles of mass and energy balances and with the help of spreadsheets and other software
tools. The basis of the model is a production facility that uses a continuous
transesterification process with two stirred tank reactors, methanol as alcohol and sodium
methoxide as catalyst. The model quantifies all the inputs and outputs in the biodiesel
production process. It can be used to compare various vegetable oils used for biodiesel
production in terms of process inputs and outputs and it can be correlated to the economic
cost data for performing various biodiesel economic feasibility studies.
Keywords.
Biodiesel, process model, spreadsheet, glycerol refining, methanol recovery, ester washing
The authors are solely responsible for the content of this technical presentation. The technical presentation does not necessarily
reflect the official position of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE), and its printing and distribution does not
constitute an endorsement of views which may be expressed. Technical presentations are not subject to the formal peer review
process by ASAE editorial committees; therefore, they are not to be presented as refereed publications. Citation of this work should
state that it is from an ASAE meeting paper EXAMPLE: Author's Last Name, Initials. 2003. Title of Presentation. ASAE Paper No.
03xxxx. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE. For information about securing permission to reprint or reproduce a technical presentation, please
contact ASAE at hq@asae.org or 269-429-0300 (2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, MI 49085-9659 USA).
Introduction
Numerous factors have pushed energy from biomass into the forefront of policy
and industry discussions. Large harvests of traditional crops, low farm prices,
combustion of fossil fuels have increased interest in renewable energy sources such
as biodiesel.
resources such as vegetable oils, animal fats and recyclable cooking oils. Chemically,
biodiesel is defined as the mono-alkyl esters of long-chain fatty acids derived from
lipid sources. The demand for biodiesel is constantly on the increase as more persons
are becoming aware of its potential to address the above issues. In order to meet the
anticipated demand, more biodiesel production plants have to be set-up in the near
future. The foremost step for setting-up a biodiesel production plant in a particular
can be utilized to collect the production data by analyzing the biodiesel production
process in terms of the various inputs, outputs and their compositions. Such
information is, in turn, needed for quantifying utility requirements and sizing
equipment. Thus, performing the mass and energy balance analysis of the full process
is a key step towards obtaining economic cost data for performing the economic
feasibility studies.
(Sheehan et al., 1998; Kleber, M. 2004), but no clear and transparent approach has
1
been utilized to illustrate the detailed inputs and outputs involved in the process. Many
economic feasibility study groups have applied the so-called “black box” approach by
listing the data for various inputs and outputs of biodiesel production collected from
private consultancy firms. Such approaches leave the readers with little understanding
process technology were taken into consideration. In order to resolve the above
and food process industries for detailed design and feasibility evaluation of a
production plant. One excellent example of a process model was shown by Fryer et
al., 1997 by modeling a cheese manufacturing plant using spreadsheets. The basic
with the help of computer spreadsheets and other software tools. This includes
specifying user-inputs in the model, referenced assumptions made for mass and
energy balance equations and the detailed calculations performed for quantifying
2
Biodiesel production process description
The continuous base-catalyzed process was selected for the process model
development (Figure 1), based on a detailed literature review for biodiesel production
(Freedman et al., 1984; Freedman et al., 1996; Noureddini et al., 1997; Darnoko et al.,
2000; Van Gerpen et al., 2003; Sheehan et al., 1998) and by visiting current biodiesel
production plants. This is the most widely used biodiesel process in the European
Union and US. The biodiesel production process was divided into four main sections:
(a) Crude oil degumming, refining and drying: The crude oil is subjected to acid
alkali refining for removing the free fatty acids. Crude oil (1) is heated to 70oC in the
heater (A). Phosphoric acid (2) is added to the heated crude oil in the mixing tank (B)
Soft water (4) is added to the mixing tank for the formation of gums from the
hydratable phosphatides. The mixing tank outstream (5) is centrifuged (C) to separate
the oil from the gums-water mix (6). Using a separator (D), the gums (7) are removed
from water (8). The degummed oil (9) is sent to a refining tank (E) for alkali refining.
Sodium hydroxide solution is added for converting the free fatty acids (FFA) present in
the degummed oil to oil-insoluble soaps. Proper mixing is ensured for the reaction.
This is followed by the addition of wash water for dissolving the soaps, which results in
the formation of soapstock that is removed from the oil using a centrifuge (F). The
resulting centrifuge outstream (14) goes to a vacuum oil dryer (G) to remove the
3
CRUDE OIL DEGUMMING REFINING
10 11 15
3 4
Crude oil
G
B E
1 2 5 9 12 14 16 H 17 Refined oil
A C F
6
7 D 13
8
28
TRANSESTERIFICATION ESTER WASHING
18 19 23 24 M 34
29
N P
17 I 20 22 K 25 27 31 O 33 35 Biodiesel
J L
21 26 30 32
METHANOL RECOVERY
36 37 T 40 U 42 Recycled Methanol
R S
Q 38 39
41
43 47
45
GLYCEROL REFINING
V 44 W 46 48
X Glycerol
4
(Continued Figure 1).
1, crude oil; 2, heated crude oil; 3, phosphoric acid; 4, soft water; 5, mixing tank outstream; 6,
gums-water mix; 7, gums; 8, water; 9, degummed oil; 10, NaOH solution; 11, wash water; 12,
refining tank outstream; 13, soapstock; 14, refined oil; 15, water vapor; 16, hot oil; 17, dried
refined oil; 18, sodium methoxide; 19, methanol; 20, CSTR 1 outstream; 21, glycerol phase;
22, ester phase; 23, sodium methoxide; 24, methanol; 25, CSTR 2 outstream; 26, glycerol
phase; 27, ester phase; 28, wash water; 29, heated wash water; 30, waste stream; 31, washed
esters; 32, aqueous phase; 33, esters; 34, water vapor; 35, biodiesel; 36, glycerol/aqueous
phase; 37, heater outstream; 38, super heated steam; 39, saturated methanol vapors and
saturated steam; 40, methanol vapor; 41, distillation column bottoms; 42, recycled methanol;
43, hot glycerol solution; 44, glycerine; 45, HCl solution; 46, acidulation reactor outstream;
47, waste; 48, product glycerol.
remaining water in the oil. The dried degummed and refined oil is sent to a surge tank
for cooling.
(b) Transesterification reaction: The refined oil stream (17) enters the CSTR 1 (I)
maintained at 65oC. Typically 100% excess methanol is added to the reactor along
reaction between triglycerides and methanol takes place in the presence of catalyst
sodium methoxide to form methyl esters i.e. biodiesel and glycerol, a co-product. Also,
the remaining trace amount of free fatty acids in the refined oil reacts with sodium
methoxide to form soaps and methanol. The reaction products (20) are separated
using decanter 1 (J) into a glycerol phase (glycerol, methanol, sodium methoxide,
soaps) and ester phase (methyl esters, unreacted oil, methanol, soaps). Further, the
ester phase (22) enters the CSTR 2 (K) and the glycerol phase goes to a collecting
tank (Q). A similar process occurs in CSTR 2 (K) and decanter 2 (L), typically using
100% excess methanol, based upon the unreacted triglyceride present. The ester
phase from decanter 2 (L) goes to the ester-washing section and the glycerol phase
5
(c) Ester washing: Impurities in the ester phase (27), such as methanol, soaps and
free glycerol have to be separated from the methyl esters. This is done by washing the
ester phase (27) by warm water (29) in wash columns. The resultant waste stream
(30) is sent to the collecting tank (Q) and the washed ester stream (31) to a settler
tank (O). The remaining aqueous phase is separated from the methyl esters in the
settler tank (O). Finally, the ester stream (33) is vacuum dried to remove any trace
(d) Methanol recovery and glycerol refining: Streams 21, 26, 30 and 32 are
combined in the collecting tank (Q). The resulting stream (36) is heated to the normal
boiling point of methanol (65oC) in the heater (R). The methanol is stripped from the
heated stream (37) using super heated steam (38) in the glycerol-alcohol stripper (S).
The saturated methanol vapors and the steam are fed into a distillation column to
recover pure methanol vapors as distillate (40). The methanol vapors (40) are
condensed in a condenser (U) and are recycled back (42) to the CSTRs. Bottoms (41)
of the distillation column contain the glycerol, condensed steam and other impurities.
The hot glycerol solution (44) from the bottom of the stripper (S) is sent to a glycerol
hold tank (V). The crude glycerol (44) from this hold tank is mixed with proper amounts
of HCl solution in the acidulation reactor (W). Catalyst sodium methoxide in the stream
(44) reacts with HCl to form methanol and NaCl and the soaps present in this stream
react with HCl to form free fatty acids and NaCl in the acidulation reactor (W). Using a
decanter (X), product glycerol (48) is separated from the free fatty acids and other
6
Biodiesel process model development
User-specified inputs
Following are the user-specified input parameters required by the spreadsheet model:
i. Mixing tank (B): Heated crude oil (2) is mixed with 0.1% percent of 0.85wt%
phosphoric acid aqueous solution (3) (Hernandez et al., 1996) followed by the
addition of soft wash water (4) equal to 75% of the phosphatide content in the
ii. Centrifuge (C): All phosphatide in the form of gums, all unreacted phosphoric
acid and 99.5% of the stream 4 is recovered in stream 6 (Sheehan et al., 1998).
iii. Refining tank (E): 9.5 wt% NaOH aqueous solution equal to 113% excess of that
added. Wash water in the form of soft water equal to 15% of the mass flow rate
of stream 9 is added (Sheehan et al., 1998). 99% of the free fatty acids are
iv. Stream 13: contains soaps formed from the reaction of free fatty acids and NaOH
in the form of soapstock, triglycerides equal to 2.5 times the amount of free fatty
7
as present in the original oil (0.015:1), and 99.5% of the stream 11 (Sheehan et
al., 1998).
v. Vacuum oil dryer (G): 100% of the water removal from stream 14 is achieved.
i. CSTR 1 (I): sodium methoxide catalyst (18) equal to 1% of the stream 17 (Myron
in methanol. Methanol is added based upon the methanol: TG ratio being input.
Also, all the free fatty acids in the oil react with the catalyst to form soap and
methanol.
ii. Stream 21: contains 60% of the total methanol in stream 20, all glycerol and
sodium methoxide in stream 20, and 10% of the total amount of soaps present in
stream 20 formed from the reaction between free fatty acids and sodium
iii. CSTR 2 (K): sodium methoxide catalyst equal to 1% of the triglyceride left
the methanol: TG ratio being input. Calculations are based upon the total
iv. Stream 26: contains 60% of the total methanol in stream 20, 10% of the total
amount of soaps in stream 25, and all the glycerol and sodium methoxide in
8
(c) Ester washing section
i. Stream 28: It is equal to the 20% of the methyl esters amount in stream 27
ii. Stream 30: Contains 90% of the stream 28 and 100% of the methanol and soaps
iii. Stream 33: Only 0.5% of the stream 28 is remaining (Sheehan et al., 1998).
ii. Stream 39: 100% recovery of the saturated methanol vapors and saturated
steam.
iii. Methanol recovery distillation column (T): Stream 40 contains methanol vapors
with 0.05% moisture level and stream 41 contains less than 0.5% methanol
iv. Stream 45: 10% aqueous HCl solution equal to 50% mass flow rate of the
v. Acidulation reactor (X): Sodium methoxide reacts with HCl to form methanol and
NaCl. Soaps react with HCl to form free fatty acids and NaCl.
vi. Stream 48: Product glycerol solution is obtained from the acidulation decanter.
9
Sample mass balance calculations
Mass balance calculations involve the use of the basic conservation of mass equation,
which states that the total mass of the components in a process has to be conserved.
Mass balance equations were applied to each individual unit for identifying the
components in each stream in the whole production process with the assumption that
no net depletion or accumulation occurred and all mass was accounted for in Fig. 1
flows.
include
where
Mi is the mass flow rate (Kg/s) of any stream i and Mij is the mass flow rate of any
(refined oil) is mixed with stream 18 (catalyst sodium methoxide) and stream 19
(methanol). Following two reactions take place to yield the stream 20 (CSTR 1
outstream).
10
1. Reaction a: Transesterification reaction between triglyceride and methanol
CH2COOR1 CH2OH
CH2COOR3 CH2OH
2. Reaction b: Reaction between free fatty acids (FFA) in the refined oil with
Components balances:
Triglyceride (t):
Glycerol (g):
11
Methanol (m):
- [(M.Wm*3)/(M.Wt)]*[(Reaction a efficiency/100)*(M17t)]
- {[(M.Wm)/(M.Wf)]*[(Reaction b efficiency/100)*(M17f)]}
(6)
Soaps (s):
where
Mi is the mass flow rate (Kg/s) of any stream i, Mij is the mass flow rate of any
in Fig. 1. Stream 38 (Super-heated steam) is required to vaporize all the water and
methanol from glycerol present in stream 37. Stream 39 contains the saturated
methanol vapors, water vapor and saturated steam vapors. Stream 44 is crude
where
Cpw, Cpm are the specific heats of water and methanol respectively,
12
tw, tm are the temperature differences required for water and methanol to reach
Lw, Lw are the latent heats of vaporization of water and methanol respectively and,
Hsu and Hsa are the enthalpies of super-heated steam and saturated steam
respectively.
Discussion
Figure 2 shows the basic structure of the model as seen from a portion of the
efficiency, crude oil to be processed and methanol: triglyceride ratio is given at the top
left hand side of the screen. This portion of the spreadsheet lists only 10 from a total of
48 streams identified in the actual model whereas all the components in the various
An example of the various process inputs and outputs identified by this model
have been illustrated in Table 1 by choosing an arbitrary basis of 100 kg/hr crude oil
entering the production plant. All the calculations change according to the specified
inputs. It provides the reader with a clear understanding of how the amounts of various
process inputs and outputs are inter-related. As the model has been based upon the
compositional data of vegetable oils, it can be used for comparisons between different
vegetable oils used for biodiesel production in terms of various process inputs and
outputs. Table 1 also shows an example of this type of comparison between soybean
13
Figure 2: Screen view of the first 10 screens in the biodiesel process model
spreadsheet
14
Table 1: Biodiesel process inputs and outputs provided by the model with
basis of 100 Kg/hr crude oil processed
Process Inputs
Crude oil (1) 100.00 100.00
Methanol (19 + 24) 13.84 14.31
Sodium methoxide (18 + 23) 10.84 10.98
NaOH (9.5 wt% aqueous 14.93 14.86
soln.)(10)
HCl (10% aqueous soln.) (45) 6.24 6.12
Process water (4 + 11 + 28) 34.69 34.49
Process Outputs
Biodiesel (35) 92.81 94.04
Methanol recycled (42) 13.36 13.70
Glycerol (48) 10.28 10.53
Waste (6 + 13 + 41 + 47) 55.57 54.05
1
Composition: 96.0% triglycerides, 0.5% free fatty acids, 2.0% phosphatides, and
1.5% others (unsaponifiable matter) (Erickson.1995).
2
Composition: 97.25% triglycerides, 0.5% free fatty acids, 1.25% phosphatides, and
1.0% others (unsaponifiable matter) (Gunstone.2002).
Conclusion
The present biodiesel production model was developed for analyzing the
biodiesel production and ultimately designing its production unit. The model can be
regions simply by linking it to the economic cost data. This paper deals mainly with the
15
glycerol-alcohol stripper (S) that were necessary for satisfying the conservation of
mass principle. A separate spreadsheet has been included in the model that deals
with the energy balance calculations based on the conservation of energy principle
(energy is conserved here similar to mass conservation principle) for calculating the
process steam requirements of the biodiesel production process but is out of the
scope for the present paper. Once a particular capacity of the biodiesel production
unit has been selected (say 15 million gallons per year), the model can also be utilized
in the process equipment design of the various equipments involved in the production
process based on the various stream mass flow rates and the desired process
References
16
7. Gunstone, F.D. 2002. Vegetable oils in food technology: Compostion,
properties and uses. Blackwell Publishing, CRC Press, UK.
8. Hernandez, E., and E.W. Lusas. 1996. Practical short course in Processing of
Vegetable Oils. College station, Texas.: The Texas A&M University System.
9. Kleber, M. 2004. Economics of a biodiesel plant. Presentation, American oil
chemists’ society annual meeting 2004. Available at:
http://www.lurgipsi.com/files/Lurgi%20AOCS%202004%20Presentation.PDF
10. Noureddini, H., and D. Zhu. 1997. Kinetics of Transesterification of Soybean
Oil. Journal of American Oil Chemists Society. 74(11): 1457-1463.
11. Sheehan, J., V. Camobreco, J. Duffield, M. Graboski, and H. Shapouri. 1998.
Life cycle inventory of biodiesel and petroleum diesel for use in an urban bus.
NREL/SR-580-24089. Golden, Colorado.: National Renewable Laboratory.
12. Van Gerpen, J., D. Clemens, G. Knothe, B. Shanks, and R. Pruszko. Biodiesel
Production Technology. 2003. Biodiesel Workshop. Ames, Iowa.: Iowa State
University.
17