Human Rights Alert

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750

Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

Friday, March 25, 2011

The riddle of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission... The missing

February 22, 2010 Judgment...

Citizens United v Federal Election Commission presumably accorded corporations First

Amendment rights. However, the First Amendment right of the people, for access to
valid and effectual records of the Supreme Court of the United States, is denied.

Los Angeles, March 25 - Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (08-205) is no doubt one of the
landmark decisions of the US Supreme Court. It was reported to have accorded corporations First
Amendment rights. However, a valid and effectual copy of the February 22, 2010 Judgment in the case - a
historic document - is yet to be discovered...

Review of online records of the US Supreme Court [1] shows:

− The journal for January 21, 2010, the date of the presumed decision, is missing the typical introductory
remark, found in many (but not all) seatings of the court, regarding certification and entry of the orders
and decisions.
− For example, on January 25, 2010, the immediate next seating of the Court, the introductory remark says:

The Chief Justice said:

"We have issued orders today, they have been duly entered and certified, and
filed with the Clerk." [underline added -jz]
− The online docket of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission says:

Feb 22 2010 JUDGMENT ISSUED. [underline added -jz]

"Issuing" of orders and judgments, which are neither certified, nor entered, is a common fraud in the lower
courts... [2]

Additional efforts to discover the February 22, 2010 Judgment were unsuccessful:
z Page 2/2 March 25, 2011

− Request was forwarded to parties in the case, for a copy of the judgment, which was supposed to have
been noticed and served. One party responded that the February 22, 2010 Judgment was neither served
nor noticed, in apparent violation of Due Process rights. No party responded that a February 22, 2010
Judgment was either noticed or served.
− The US Department of Justice, in response to a Freedom of Information request for the February 22, 2010
Judgment, responded that "The Civil Division does not maintain records relating to that case."
− Previous attempts to discover valid and effectual judicial records in paper court files of the US Supreme
Court uniformly failed. Access to the electronic records of the US Supreme Court was and is denied, in
apparent violation of First Amendment rights. [3]

Reports of the United Nations Crime Prevention Center on "Strengthening Judicial Integrity" list missing
court records as a cardinal sign of judicial corruption. [4,5]
With it, the vague and ambiguous records of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (08-205) join the
likewise vague and ambiguous records of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 118 U.S. 394,
where the Supreme Court was reported to have recognized corporations as persons for purposes of the
Fourteenth Amendment.

In short: Citizens United v Federal Election Commission presumably accorded corporations First Amendment
rights. However, the First Amendment right of the people, for access to valid and effectual records of the
Supreme Court of the United States is denied. As a result, at present, there is no way to ascertain, whether in
fact a valid and effectual February 22, 2010 Judgment in Citizens United v Federal Election Commission was
ever certified and entered.

LINKS:
[1] 11-03-16 Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (08-205) in the Supreme Court of the United
States - Review and Compiled Online Records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50900898/
[2] 11-02-09 Press Release: 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, Insists on
Conducting a Pretense Appeal from a Pretense Judgment of the US District Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49070315/
[3] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47539382/
[4] 00-04-00 Report of the First Vienna Convention - Strengthening Judicial Integrity, CICP-6, United
Nations Drug Control and Crime Prevention Center (2000) (See p5-6)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50364404/
[5] 01-03-01 Strengthening Judicial Integrity Against Corruption CICP-10, United Nations Drug Control and
Crime Prevention Center (2001) (see p5-6)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48103697/