Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
According to the introductions and first chapters of the books, French Cultural
Studies by Jill Forbes and Michael Kelly, French Popular Culture by Hugh Dauncy and Popular
Culture in Modern France by Brian Rigby that culture and identity has always been linked
together because culture is evidently one of the ways which identity (may it be national
identity, ethnic identity or personal identity) is conveyed and constructed.
For all that, let us all go back to the fundamentals and grasp what really is cultural
studies. In general, cultural studies means the analysis of culture understood in the broadest
and most inclusive sense of the word. Cultural studies collapses the distinctions frequently
made between `culture' and `non-‐culture', or what are more commonly known as `high
culture' or la culture cultivee and `popular culture'. Cultural studies rejects the social
narrowness or exclusivity demonstrated by such definitions and the implicit system of values
that underpin them. Cultural studies strips culture of elitism and hierarchical ordering,
broadening and extending the definition of culture to include such texts and practices as
cinema, television, popular music, advertising and the like. Furthermore, Dauncy claims that
French cultural identity itself has often been ignored in discussion of French culture that
could actually be the barrier to cultural exchanges of the French society.
The three documents state that identities are the carriers of values and norms
manifested in social structures, institutions and relationship of power. These identities are
widely affected by several factors such as the traumas of citizens caused by modern warfare
particularly the German occupations, the Franco-‐Prussian War and the Great War. Identities
are also influenced by inevitable technological advances and mass production of popular
press, films, images and music by the Culture Industry. France has also experienced the
emergence
of
globalization
wherein
Anglo-‐American
cultural
dominance
started
to
take
the
place
of
French
national
culture.
Another
factor
is
the
strike
of
10
million
workers
during
May of 1968 that caused the collapse of the presidency of Charles de Gaulle. This event had
caused the public to be liberal and politically active in alleviating their education and
employment conditions. And finally, the violence of the ever-‐prevailing capitalist system.
This had given the biggest impact in French culture because of he aggravation of the
situation between the trades people and small farmers and the dominance of the city
against country. The perfect example of this is the hegemony of Paris over the rest of France
that resulted to tensions because Paris is gives the impression of being the “standard.” The
working class (which is depicted as the hero against the capitalist system, the unwashed
barbarian and the long-‐suffering laborer by Forbes and Kelly) who is expected to be
oppresses and manipulated by the bourgeosie. This upper stratum is meant to control the
The three introductions concluded that French culture has indeed a lot to offer not
just in France but also for the rest of the world. As Levi-‐Strauss said that “The richness and
multiplicity of its cultural discourses are a guarantee that it will continue to find powerful
and vivid ways of articulating new identities. And for this reason French culture is a precious
resource not only for France, but also for others who are willing to listen.”