Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
us
Marriott International
Hospital Corporation of America
The Rezidor Hotel Group
Premier
Wyndham Worldwide
Industrial Manufacturing
Insurance
Caterpillar
Aflac Incorporated
Deere & Company
Sompo Japan Insurance
Eaton Corporation
Swiss Re
Milliken & Company
Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Co.
Schneider Electric
Internet Media, Publishing and Entertainment
Zappos Thomson Reuters
Medical Devices
Metals
Becton Dickinson
Umicore
Royal Phillips
Real Estate
British Land plc Restaurants and Cafes
Jones Lang LaSalle Starbucks Coffee Company
Unibail-Rodamco
Specialty Retail
Best Buy Co.
Specialty Pharma Hennes & Mauritz
Medicis Sonae
Target
Ten Thousand Villages
Telecom Hardware
Staffing Avaya Inc.
Manpower Cisco Systems
Juniper Networks
Transportation and Logistics
Telecom Services
Autoridad del Canal de Panama
Singapore Telecom
East Japan Railway Company
Swisscom
Nippon Yusen Kabushi Kaisha
T-Mobile USA
UPS
The List:
1 (tie). Lord Willy 26. Jeff Bezos 51. Paul Bulcke 76. Shai Agassi
Bach 27. Ernst Ligteringen 52. Martin Kreutner 77. Stanley Fischer
1 (tie). Jack Straw 28. Kathleen Edmond 53. Zachary Bentley 78. Toby Heaps
3. Jon Leibowitz 29. Mo Ibrahim 54. (tie) Oliver 79. Birgitta Jonsdottir
4. Abu Kassim 30. Danny Holmes Kuttner 80. Brad Smith
Mohamed 31. Len Sauers 54. (tie) Ron Cerven 81. Lola Gonzalez
5. James Wetta 32. Huguette Labelle 54. (tie) Roger 82. Arlen Spector
6. Indra Nooyi 33. Michael Luscombe Riedener 83. Michael Hershman
7. Paul Volcker 34. Robert Chatwani 57. Vinod Khosla 84. Rich Lechner
8. Lanny Breuer 35. Elizabeth Warren 58. Matthew Lee 85. Mark Makepeace
9. Jeff Immelt 36. Wolfgang U. 59. Alexandra Wrage 86. (tie) Ashraf Ghani
10. Joaquin Almunia 37. Sue Cischke 60. Angel Gurria 86. (tie) Clare
11 (tie). Barney Frank 38. John Dugan 61. Andrew Kassoy Lockhart
11 (tie). Chris Dodd 39. Sharon Allen 62. Jermyn Brooks 88. Ron James
13. Delaware Supreme 40. Rakesh Khurana 63. Alexei Navalny 89. Ellen Iobst
Court 41. Shan Ramburuth 64. Daniel Thelesklaf 90. Joe Solmonese
14. Mary Schapiro 42. Mike Robinson 65. Marjorie Doyle 91. Dick Bednar
15. Mike Duke 43. Kate Ellis 66. Salam Fayyad 92. Prince Charles
16 (tie). Bill Gates 44. Bill Marriott 67. Geoff Lye 93. Susan Forsell
16 (tie). Warren 45. Paul Polman 68. Ethan Zuckerman 94. (tie) Samuel
Buffett 46. Lily Safra 69. Gary Aguirre Rubenfield
18. Jeffrey Swartz 47. (tie) Jim Balsillie 70. Chris MacDonald 94. (tie) Joe Palazzolo
19. William Sessions 47. (tie) Mike 71. Richard Cassin 96. Peter Webster
20. Robert Zoellick Lazaridis 72. Roy Snell 97. Tensie Whelan
21. Peter Loscher 49. Frank Baldino, Jr. 73. Kate Heiny 98. Christiana
22. Irving H. Picard 50. Peter Welch 74. Mindy Lubber Figueres
23. Andrew Cuomo 75. Hu Shuli 99. Kamal Kar
24. Dominique 100. Christy Wood
Strauss-Kahn
25. Nitin Nohria
30. Danny Holmes – Former Police Officer, Kansas City Police Department
Category: Media and Whistle-Blowers
Holmes won a $6.5 million whistle-blower suit for wrongful termination
after refusing to write a false report and hold on to a box of ammunition rather than turn it
over for evidence. He made a strong example for others to follow around the country.
Back to List
37. Sue Cischke – VP Sustainability, Environment and Safety Engineering, Ford Motor
Company
Category: Corporate Culture
Cischke makes this list after Ford, in 2010, became the first automotive company to join
the Carbon Disclosure Program’s Water Disclosure Program. The Water Disclosure
Program helps large companies understand business risks and opportunities around
water-related issues.
Back to List
42. Mike Robinson – VP Environment, Energy and Safety Policy, General Motors
Category: Business Leadership
Robinson, as the head of General Motors’ environmental and energy policy, earned a spot
on this year’s list after GM announced that 62 of its plants have become zero waste to
landfill facilities. Similar to other individuals who worked towards reducing waste in
their companies, GM’s efforts are significant because they are way ahead of the curve in
terms of timing. Many other companies aspire to accomplish this in 2020 or later, GM
gets kudos for achieving it earlier.
Back to List
• Βεσ τ Ετη ι χ σ Πρ ο γ ρ α µ σ Οϖ ε ρ α λ λ
• 10 Β ε σ τ Πρ ι ϖ α τ ε Χοµ π α ν ι ε σ
• 5 Βεσ τ Φο ρ ε ι γ ν Χο µ π α ν ι ε σ
• 10 Β ε σ τ Ιντ ε ρ ν α λ Χο ν τ ρ ο λ Σψσ τ ε µ σ
• 10 Β ε σ τ Ιντ ε ρ ν α λ Χο ν τ ρ ο λ Σψσ τ ε µ σ
10 Β ε σ τ Χο δ ε σ οφ Χο ν δ υ χ τ
<HTML><META HTTP-EQUIV="content-type"
CONTENT="text/html;charset=utf-8">
<P class=entry>
<TBODY>
Rank</TD></TR>
<TD class=xl29>1</TD></TR>
<TD class=xl28>A</TD>
<TD class=xl29>2</TD></TR>
<TD class=xl28>A</TD>
<TD class=xl29>3</TD></TR>
<TD class=xl28>A</TD>
<TD class=xl29>4</TD></TR>
<TD class=xl28>A</TD>
<TD class=xl29>5</TD></TR>
<TD class=xl25>Accenture</TD>
<TD class=xl28>A</TD>
<TD class=xl29>6</TD></TR>
<TD class=xl25>Pepsico</TD>
<TD class=xl28>A</TD>
<TD class=xl29>7</TD></TR>
<TD class=xl28>A</TD>
<TD class=xl29>8</TD></TR>
<TD class=xl28>A-</TD>
<TD class=xl29>9</TD></TR>
<TD class=xl28>A-</TD>
<TD class=xl29>10</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>
• We recognized that CO2 emission and waste reduction were the same as the cost
savings and reduction of parts, materials and wasteful operations in which we
were previously engaged. I am firmly convinced that these ideas resulted in
increased production, reduced costs and improvements in the quality of our
products.
• We realized that it has become essential to visualize CO2 emissions not only in
the production process but in all other operations. Once you can identify where
emissions are the highest, that is your starting point for reduction and new ideas
emerge out of this process. When cost is added in as a factor, you ought to be able
to see real improvements in production as well as cost reduction. When the results
become apparent, everyone is motivated.
In fact, by setting high goals for slowing global warming, we at Ricoh have been able to
motivate everyone to promote process innovation not only in production, but also in all
other operations. Taking the production process as an example, with OPCs (Organic
Photo Conductors), the heart of copiers and laser printers, we managed to reduce CO2
emissions by more than 85 percent and cut OPC production costs by half. This was
achieved through selective placement of clean ventilation points along the production line
rather than needlessly covering the entire line.
Each corporation must set its own targets with an aim to contribute sufficiently to the
global reduction tally. It’s the only way. Every business must take on these challenges
through technological process innovation.
I acknowledge accomplishing ambitious goals is no easy task. There are many obstacles
that may be in your way. For instance, as a large, multinational company, it’s not always
easy to convince different regional offices to operate in the same, environmentally-
friendly way. To be honest, there have been some cultural differences in both
understanding and commitment between regions in the past.
One example of how regional problems may come into play is that a geographically large
country might not have a problem with dumping waste in open spaces, or absorbing CO2
through its abundant nature—and in those countries it was quite a challenge to promote
emission reduction programs. However, gradually, through company-wide global
conferences, our senior executives and managers were able to achieve international
cooperation through everyone’s common understanding of four main points: 1) the
importance of conservation; 2) our responsibility as global citizens; 3) the significance of
the Ricoh Group’s commitment to environmental management; and 4) the need to
educate and encourage all group members to participate. Nowadays all regions, be it the
Americas, Europe, China or Asia Pacific, pursue similar actions in their own way, and
with great enthusiasm.
We have no time to waste when it comes to environmental protection. The role and
influence of corporations is becoming greater. No matter how hard the task, I believe we
have no choice but to tackle global warming now. We simply cannot leave these
problems for the next generation to solve. If you ask me as Chairman of Keizai Doyukai
which I prioritize more—stopping global warming or economic growth—my answer is to
take global warming seriously while promoting management innovation toward building
a low carbon society.
Business management of the future must be able to generate profits based on achieving
high emission reduction targets. I firmly believe, and would like everyone to believe, that
environmental conservation and sustainable profits are mutually compatible. If, as a
corporate executive, your commitment to the environment is deep, you will achieve both
business and environmental sustainability as well as enjoy greater success as a business.
Keizai Doyukai, chaired by Masamitsu Sakurai, is the Japanese Association of Corporate
Executives, a powerful industry government advisory body
Under Sakurai, Ricoh was the first company in Japan to commit to the Kyoto Protocol
Ricoh has made the Global 100 list at Davos for the 5th year running.
Sakurai-san became president and eventually CEO of Ricoh in 1996, jumping over 8
senior executives in the process. He already had behind him 9 years of overseas
experience in Europe where he opened a major production plant and then served as
European Chairman.
A major league baseball team is playing its last regular season game of the year: win this
game and they advance to the play-offs; lose, and they watch the play-offs on TV. In the
bottom of the 9th, one of its star players steps to the plate, the score tied, a man on first,
no outs. The right thing for him to do is to lay down a sacrifice bunt to move the runner
into scoring position. This player happens to have an incentive clause in his contract,
however, that would be triggered if he gets one more hit for the season, and that incentive
clause would bring him a big bonus and a contract extension. The player lays down the
sacrifice bunt, and his team goes on to win the game and advance to the post season.
After the game, a reporter who was aware of what was at stake for that star player in his
last at-bat asked the team’s manager how he convinced the player “to do what was right.”
The manager replied, “We try to create an atmosphere here where the question doesn’t
even arise.”
I heard this true story from one of our executives, and I often use it when talking to our
employees about the way we “play the game” at Parsons. Our strong commitment to our
six Core Values – Safety, Quality, Integrity, Diversity, Innovation and Sustainability –
governs everything we do at Parsons. Our Core Values are the very beliefs that form the
culture of our organization, that make us who we are, that form the basis for all of our
decisions. We strive hard to create an atmosphere where the question of deviating from
those Core Values, from doing what is right, whether for perceived individual or
corporate gain, never even gets raised.
Each of our Core Values has a goal, and for Integrity our goal is ZERO deviations from
our Corporate Ethics Policy. We have performance metrics that we have developed to
track composite leading and lagging indicators of our performance against this goal and
to report to management, and to our Board of Directors, on our progress on a quarterly
basis.
To achieve this goal requires constant communication. All new employees receive
training in Parsons’ Ethics Policy, including watching a video from me discussing the
importance of a commitment to ethics for our company, our employees, our customers
and our suppliers. All employees are required to be re-trained in our Ethics Policy on a
regular basis, and our employees participate in Ethics Challenges on our internal website
several times a year. Additionally, each of our quarterly Executive Committee meetings
addresses an Ethics/Integrity Moment.
A company should seek constant improvement in the way it conducts business, and
commitment to integrity is no exception. We are always looking for ways to improve our
ethics program, both in terms of the message itself and the way we communicate that
message. As an example, in the past Parsons issued periodic Ethics Bulletins to
employees, highlighting particular ethics issues in each Bulletin, but that was a static
communication. Over the past year, we have instituted Ethics Challenges on our internal
website, describing a certain fact scenario in which our employees could well find
themselves, and asking our employees to vote and comment on how the person in the
Challenge should respond. We then compile the responses and publish them on our
internal website, along with a sampling of the comments submitted and with an analysis
from our Ethics Committee.
We’ve gone from a static communication to an interactive dialog, and we’ve had
tremendous responses, both in terms of the number of people who participate and in the
depth of the comments we’ve received. Most importantly, it has our employees talking
and debating about ethics, and that’s really what any company hopes to achieve.
In the short term, a corporation’s commitment to integrity may cost it a project, or result
in an individual employee, or the corporation, missing certain financial targets. Parsons
has in the past walked away from potential projects or teaming partners when
questionable ethics issues have surfaced, and we will continue to do so in the future. The
end results of such short-term losses, however, are virtually always long-term gains:
gains in reputation as a company that doesn’t cut ethical corners; gains in attracting
employees who already have their own personal commitment to integrity and want to
work for a company which is similarly committed; and gains in attracting the right kind
of suppliers, subcontractors and teaming partners with
whom to work.
In my baseball example at the beginning of this article, the star player did “what was
right,” laid down a sacrifice bunt, and the team won the game and went to the play-offs.
But suppose, despite the bunt, the team had gone on to lose the game? In my mind, laying
down the bunt, playing the game the right way, was still the right thing to do. And
conducting our business with integrity in everything we do, playing the game “the right
way” even if it means losing a potential project or customer or partner, is always the right
way to play the game.
Book Price-Fixing Law Gets Amazon in
Trouble in Germany
Adjust text size:
December 30th, 2009, 12:00 GMT| By Lucian Parfeni