Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The number of days from the 1962 bottom to the 1974 bottom is 3093.
The number of days from the 1974 bottom to the 1982 bottom is 1984.
The number of days from the 1982 bottom to the 1987 peak is ?
1984 = 0.64145 0.64145 x 1984 = 1273
3093
A is to B as B is to C
1273 is to 1984 as 1984 is to 3093
( 1984 ) ² = 1273
3093
We have just taken up a lot of space to show the same relationships in several
different ways. About ninety percent of you were probably bored silly and
wondering why we would waste so much time and space on such an elementary
proposition. Well, the reason is just as simple as the principle we just belabored:
The market itself can be simple. If you get comfortable with just one thing,
simple continuous proportions, you will astound yourself as to the amount of
knowledge you can mine from the markets, and in the process you should be able
to mine some gold.
Figure 1 illustrates the above relationships on a graph covering the time period
from the 1962 bottom to the 1987 peak. It illustrates that the two "time distances"
between the three major bottoms, 1962-74-82, bear the same relationship to each
other as the time distance between the last bottom, 1982, and the 1987 peak bear
to each other to the day, covering a period of 25 years & 6350 trading days!
Example 2
The turning points that are involved in Example 1 have "proven" that they are part
of the underlying architecture of the market, because they have demonstrated the
importance of their relationship to each other. Therefore, we can expect them to
"strike" again:
The total number of days from the 1962 bottom to the 1982 bottom is 5077
The total number of days from the 1962 bottom to the 1987 peak is 6350:
5077 5077²
= 0.7995 0.7995 x 5077 = 4059 = 4059
6350 6350
This is another three term continuous proportion This time we only showed the
same thing in a few different ways ...soon we'll just show it one way. Chart
Example 2 illustrates that 4059 days forward from the 1982 bottom is the DJIA
bottom of 09/01/98! Now we are covering a time span of over thirty six years!
When will it end? Never!
Figure 2
Example 3
Figure 3
Example 4
The type of transformation created with the cylindrical mirror alters distance,
and therefore is not isometric, as are reflections, rotations, and translations,
all of which preserve distance.
Another example: Try to recall how your face appeared in a fun house mirror.
Try to recall the mirror that made your nose look as though it jutted out six
inches from your face, and your eyes became tiny dots, pulled in so close to
the sides of your nose that they almost merged. Your ears were flattened to
the sides of your head and barely visible. Basically, the "front to back" vector
of your head had been enlarged, and the "side to side" vector had been
diminished. You definitely appeared out of proportion, and distorted. If the
reverse had happened to your head, your ears would have been two feet
apart, and your nose flattened against the front of your face.
If the cylindrical mirror shown "decoding" the oil painting in the illustration at
the beginning of this section were replaced with a circle, then each point on
the plane (oil painting) could be described by locating its image relative to
the circle. This transformation is termed an "inversion".
This basic book on Ermanometry will not probe deeply into the restoration of
three dimensional forms from their image on the plane. However, inversions
themselves will be used extensively to demonstrate proportional
relationships. The reader may note a conceptual relationship between this
concept and the ability of the same market move to exist simultaneously in
different shapes. These chameleon moves (relative to shape, not color), are
primarily illustrated in the MacArthur Syndrome.
Example 5
1056 is the exact number of days from the "break" point at the 1976 high, to
the 1980 S&P peak.
The hypotenuse of a triangle, with legs of 859 and 614.86 is, you guessed it!
1056
Figures 14 & 18 in the Log Spiral article in the February issue of Stocks &
Commodities illustrated the "reincarnation" of the 1102 & 1147 day market moves
on segments of the log spiral.
On this site, the figures are 13 & 17. Reincarnation of market moves is a very
powerful tool in both projection and confirmation of important market moves. At
Ermanometry research we refer to this very common phenomenon, as the "The
MacArthur Syndrome." General MacArthur is famous for his statement, upon
leaving the Philippine Islands, "I Shall Return." He is also famous for another
statement, "Old Soldiers Never Die, They Just Fade Away. " Market moves always
return, never die, and although they may to "fade away" for a while, they are
merely not visible on the plane. Think of an underground river that rises to the
surface occasionally. Or, child playing hide and seek, "now you see me, now you
don’t." Ermanometry uses various methods to decode the hiding places of these
playful market moves and bring them into the sunlight. They can run, but they
can’t hide!
Please note that once again we are using the same ’74 -‘78 moves to illustrate a
principle. Are you beginning to get the feeling that these moves might contain
some sort of market DNA? Maybe these moves are a fractal. Perhaps,but we never
use the word fractal. Marketing wizards with no respect for the amazing beauty of
true fractals, and the genius of Benoit Mandelbrot, have thrown the word around
indiscriminately, applying it to everything and anything with which they could
stretch a connection. It has become a buzzword. We have not seen a single
instance of the proper application of this proposition! If we may twist a familiar
expression: Marketing swine are casting pseudo pearls before eager, unsuspecting
seekers of trading truth. Any day now we expect to receive solicitations from
"FRACTAL DEPOT-BUY ONE GET ONE FREE!" for "new and improved fractals",
"industrial strength fractals", ad nauseum! We apologize for digressing, but we do
feel very strongly about get rich schemes and buzzwords " Back to the future"
(because the 1473 day move in this example will return again ) and on to the chart
explanation:
Using constant dollar data, the S&P made a major high in 1968 (the constant
dollar peak from the 1932 low) and declined to 1982. The number of days
from the 1968 peak to the NOMINAL PRICE LOW in 1974 is 1473. Beginning at
the 1974 low, the market moved up for 497 days to the 1976 peak, and down
for 362 days to the 1978 low. Using 497 and 362 as legs of a right triangle,
generates a hypotenuse of 614. The sum of the 3 sides, the perimeter,
equals 1473.
As one works with various market moves they become like old friends with
distinct personalities. This fellow walked the straight and narrow from 1968
down to 1974, but the bottoming out process warped him a bit and he got
mixed up with "bad company". As punishment he was reincarnated as a
triangle! Even market moves have karma!
Example 7
The ’74 -'76 -’82 moves, from a different perspective, generate the
major low on April 4, 1994.
Please remember that Figure 15, page 27, in the Log Spiral article, Stocks &
Commodities, illustrated how the 497 day move (’74 up to ’76) and the 859
day move (‘74 low to ’78 low) generated a continuous 3 term proportion, the
third term being the 1484 day move down from the ’76 top to the ’82 low.
Now we will use 497 and 1484 as the first 2 terms of another 3 term
continuous proportion, which is the same as merely squaring the ratio
between 859 and 497.
Line segment AC is obviously the diameter of the circle. The diameter is the
sum of AX and XC, 497 plus 4431, for a total of 4928.
On the chart accompanying this example text please note that the exact
number of days from the ’74 low (starting point for the 497 day move) to the
major low of 04/04/94 is 4928 days.
Example 9
Generating the 1990 Gulf War Low, from the 1974– 1976 move
Figure 9
Please recall the discussion of Compound Pivots in the log spiral article, Stocks &
Commodities, February ,1999, and that in 1982 the two end pivots were 08/09 and
08/12. The decline from the 1976 top to the 08/12/82 low is 1487 days, 3 more than
the 1484 days used in the previous example. One of the rules of Compound Pivots:
Each pivot must be used for projections.
The principle illustrated in this example, using the perimeter value of a right
triangle, is also shown in Figure 23, (figure 22 on this site) page 34, of the log spiral
article, Stocks & Commodities, February , 1999.
"Data geeks" is a term often applied to our personnel here at Ermanometry Research. We've
even been called data freaks. Sometimes the language gets still more colorful, and we love it!
From our perspective, the strongest language is the greatest compliment, provided that it
refers only to our obsession with accurate data. We consider it confirmation that we are doing
our job.
Our research requires us to be compulsive about accurate data. One of the foundations of our
work is that market movements are not random. This applies to all freely traded markets, cash
and futures, from grains and metals to financials and equities. Our thesis that all markets
conform to specific dynamic patterns, both in price and time, was not a preconception for
which we sought evidence. This thesis was developed from overwhelming evidence uncovered
through painstaking data analysis. The book, Ermanometry-The Perfectly Patterned Stock
Market, contains hundreds of pages with this evidence and the methods used to decode market
moves. Ermanometry measures moves of more than 60 years using increments no larger than a
single trading day. We do not count in weeks, months or years. The permissible error factor on
these massive moves is less than one/thousandth of one percent. Accurate data is imperative in
this analytical environment. For example, Ermanometry Research has projections for more than
16 time periods of major support or resistance for the DJIA and S&P 500 during 1999. Among
the most significant are those centered on April 12 and September 1. If the indices exceed the
highs of January 8, 1999, we expect them the be making historic highs about April 12. These
projections result from the application of proprietary algorithms to the number of trading days
between previous major turning points. We consider turning points to be those days on which
the market reaches new intraday high or low extremes and then reverses. Closing prices are
considered. Some of our algorithms require multipliers as large as four. Assume that a
projection was based upon applying a multiplier of four to a move counted as 100 days. Assume
that the true turning point actually occurred on day 99, but faulty data caused us to believe
the turn occurred on day 100. Multiplying the incorrect total of 100 days by four, and then
adding the resulting 400 days (accurate data would have given a total of 396) to day 100 of the
previous move, would actually create an error of five days. A four-day error resulted from the
multiplication, and adding the result to day 100 instead of day 99 of the previous move
increases the error factor to five days. Obviously, this is unacceptable. Thus a data error of
only one day could cause our high probability projection of a major trend change in the indices
to be shifted from the time period centered on April 12 to one a whole week later, centered on
April 19.
The extent to which Ermanometry Research requires accurate data may not apply to the
average trader/analyst. We believe in the KISS principle (keep it simple, stupid) and a trader
should never get so involved in "details" that the big picture is obscured. A favorite expression
of ours is... some people are so fervent over details they get caught in their own underwear.
Nevertheless, Ermanometry has found many errors in the official records of major exchanges,
regarding both the actual count of trading days and daily high/low prices, and all market
participants should be aware of the potential for errors and the results of using bad data. A few
bad ticks may not have much effect on moving averages and oscillators, but errors have a
cumulative impact. Trendlines can be terribly skewed if the bad ticks include an important high
or low.
Figure 1 illustrates an erroneous daily high that still resides in data banks 10 years after it
occurred. It contains a "spike" that occurred on October 31, 1988 and shown on the five-minute
chart of the S&P 500 Index. If the analyst was using real time data and small increment time
charts, the spike would have been obvious, and a correction made. However, on an hourly
chart the spike would not necessarily be evident. The error would be almost impossible to
detect on a daily bar chart.
Figure 2
This is the time and sales data for the NYSE Composite, the best
surrogate for the S&P 500. This index did not reflect a sudden rise and
fall at 2:23. This is conclusive proof that the data for the S&P was
faulty.
Figure 2 is a "time and sales" listing for the S&P 500 Index and the NYSEC
for five minutes on 10/31/88.
Figure 3
S&P 500 Index, Monday October 31, 1988
Figure 3 shows the statistics printed in all of the financial papers on the next day. Please note
that the erroneous tick is shown as the high for the day. This error is "forever" embedded in
every historical data bank that Ermanometry has investigated. Vendors of historical data are in
a difficult position. They may know of errors but if their data conflicts with the "official" data,
the client will most likely assume that the official records are correct and the vendor's data is
wrong. Therefore, the vendors will usually retain the faulty data rather than conflict with the
official records.
A bad tick in an index is usually caused by a bad tick in one of the individual stocks in the
index. The NYSE will normally correct the error in the individual stock data. However, the
indices are calculated by outside vendors. Therefore, unless the outside vendor picks up the
correction message sent by the NYSE for the individual stock and then recalculates the index
and sends out a correction message to be inserted at the proper time, the index will remain
uncorrected. It is a mistake to assume that these corrections will be made.
There is one recent development that may alleviate the problem of bad ticks in the DJIA. Dow
Jones & Company, Inc. has recently canceled old licenses which allowed a multitude of outside
data vendors to compute and distribute the various Dow Jones & Company, Inc. averages. Dow
Jones & Company, Inc. will compute the averages and the Chicago Board of Trade will be the
exclusive gateway for redistribution of the calculations to other vendors. At this time we do not
know if the averages will be recomputed when bad ticks in individual stocks are corrected and
the corrections in the averages then distributed. Even if these corrections in the averages are
made, there is still the problem of inserting the corrections into individual data bases.
The type of error represented in figure 1 is particularly insidious because if the analyst
corrected the spike on an intraday chart he may have assumed that the bad tick had been
permanently eliminated. Unfortunately, since the bad tick represented the high for the day,
those data feeds that recap the daily high/low, often received from other vendors, would show
the bad tick as a high. Thus the error would show on the daily chart even though the analyst
had eliminated it on the intraday charts.
Some errors are innocuous but Murphy's law appears to have undue influence upon when the
most errors occur. A disproportionate share of errors occurs at the end of explosive or panicky
moves. These are the most chaotic moments and the environment in which errors thrive. The
"end" of such moves often contains the extremes for the period and price action analyzed.
Therefore, the analyst must consider all extremes suspect until verified. Remember, errors at
extremes affect not only timing, but trendlines, oscillators, and almost every tool in the
analyst's arsenal.
It is impossible to truly appreciate the large number of price corrections, insertions, deletions,
etc. without having had the experience of watching the data stream printed out on the yellow
paper tape from an old Western Union type ticker. Corrections will appear almost every few
inches. Sometimes the entries are as simple as changing a bid or ask quote to an actual trade,
or vice versa, and other times entire strings of trades are deleted. Very often these deleted
trades actually took place, but they are "busted" (deleted) because the trades shouldn't have
been executed.
Busted trades are most frequent in the futures pits. When trading is frenzied it is possible that
a pit broker might not hear or see every bid/ask in the pit and the market will trade "through" a
price that a broker is legitimately, diligently bidding or offering.
Assume that the market is trending down from 105 in very active trading. Conditions may or
may not warrant a "fast market" designation which would invoke a different set of parameters
governing pit rules. Fast market conditions will not be covered in this article because it would
be an unnecessary complication:
Broker A is diligently bidding for 10 contracts at 101.
Across the pit, Broker B bids 100 for two contracts.
Broker C, standing next to Broker B, receives an order to sell four contracts "at the
market."
Broker C sells 2 contracts to Broker B at 100. Broker B then drops his bid to 99, and
Broker C sells him two more at 99.
News hits the market, there are no more offers, and bids rise to 103. The next trade is
104.
Broker A never got a chance to buy any contracts at 101.
Conditions were such that Broker C neither saw nor heard Broker A's bid at 101. It was an
honest error.
Broker A's client, seeing the prints at 100 and 99 rightfully assumed that his order to buy
at 101 had been filled.
The pit committee would most likely bust the trades at 100 and 99, and a deletion
message would be sent.
Broker C's sales at 100 and 99, would be given to Broker A who had been bidding 101.
Thus the selling client would get a better price, and Broker A's buyer would have been
filled on four of the 10 contracts he wanted to buy.
Murphy's law not only makes sure that the most errors occur at the end of runs, but also that
deletions or insertions will hover around the "even" prices, such as 100 or 150. This means that
the point and figure chartist may have filled a box that should not be filled, or not filled one
that should have been filled. Erroneous data can cause charts to read like comic strips, and
cause oscillators and moving averages to generate false buy or sell signals, particularly in short-
term trading.
The analyst can take measures to protect the integrity of his data. The obvious answer is to be
constantly vigilant. The best measures are to understand the differences between various data
feeds and charting software. If short-term in and out trading is done, it is helpful for the
analyst/trader to have a data source that automatically transmits all error messages and
deletes, inserts, and corrects the data used.
There are many real-time data feeds available. Unfortunately they are not all equal in their
performance concerning corrections, and speed. Another important factor is whether or not the
analyst/trader can access the vendor's data base with his own computer, i.e. two way
communication, or is merely a passive recipient of the data. As a passive recipient it is
necessary for the analyst/trader to manually make any corrections that he may find. The kind
that he would know of would probably be limited to daily high/low prices or obvious spikes.
Manual corrections are time consuming and aggravating, and the trader/analyst would still be
unaware of the vast majority of corrections.
There are some data vendors that make corrections in the client's data even though the data is
stored on the client's computer. However, the type of corrections made are usually not as
comprehensive as those available to the client who has constant direct communication with the
data base of a vendor that corrects every erroneous print.
The intent of this article is to make you, the reader, aware of data aberrations but not to make
you paranoid about them. Bad ticks are not going to "make or break" your trading.
Trading discipline and money management are more important, and they should not be
neglected while you get distracted or "caught in your own underwear" in the attempt to clean
up every single tick.