State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Chippewa County

Branch 1

Jeffrey P. Erbs
Petitioner
vs.
CASE NO. 10 FA 11

Mary Ann Erbs

Respondent
Motion to Show Cause Re: Vexatious Litigation

Comes now, Jeffrey P. Erbs, upon Motion to Show Cause Re: Vexatious Litigation, whereby Pamela
Veith has once again, asked a Vexed Question with intent to harm, harass, intimidate, and maintain the
Action of Racketeering, Constituting Criminal Coercion, whereby Jeffrey P. Erbs, and Mary Ann Erbs
are in the action of being extorted by Court Process.

1. On January 13th, 2011 there was made acknowledgment by this Court, and Pamela Veith that she had
gotten the Severson report...page 19 line 14

2. On Januaery 13th, 2011 Pamela Veith again makes subtle threat to extort by Court Process,
whereby she states in open court that she has not received discovery of the Social Security that
Jeffrey P. Erbs has received, including any and all lump sums, although NOT substantial to this
cause in action, FORCING Mary Ann Erbs, and Jeffrey P. Erbs again to PROVE a negative,
extorting money out of not only her client, but Jeffrey P. Erbs by threat of filing Motions, and or
charging for his motions to Protect him self from this onslaught. HOWEVER, on July 8th, 2010,
there is made acknowledgment of not only the lump sum payout, but also his monthly award
(again, reiterating an estimated amount of what he is receiving in Social Security DISABILITY
amounts, whilst arguing he is receiving medicare, whereby he is low income, acknowledged by
Pamela Veith, on numerous occasions between September 8th, 2010, and January 27th, 2011.
Disability benefits can only be ADMITTED as substantial matter, IF the person receiving said
benefits ALREADY has a prior OBLIGATION, meaning Jeffrey P. Erbs would have to OWE
Mary Ann Erbs Alimony and have a prior AWARD established by the Courts, for Pamela Veith
to ASK for such DISCOVERY in this cause in action. Upon Petition, Jeffrey P. Erbs is the
Deprived party in this case, and at no time is his Disability BENEFIT able to be divided as to
this Cause in Action.
3. On January 13th. 2011, Pamela Veith states in open court that an Administrative Law Judge
found Jeffrey P. Erbs to be disabled as of November 29th. 2007. The original Petition for
Divorce, was dated on January 12th, 2010. Any and all actions Pamela Veith has taken to
DETERMINE Jeffrey P. Erbs to be disabled, is vexatious, meant to harass, harm, intimidate,
and otherwise Prevent Justice in these matters, Constituting Obstruction of Justice. (please refer
to transcript of proceedings dated April 22, 2010, and subsequent transcripts for continuing acts
of Deprivation of Jeffrey P. Erbs caused by the Actions of Pamela Veith.
4. In regards to the Barnes report; this report is non-existent, until Jeffrey P. Erbs decides, when,
and IF he intends on calling her as a witness in these matters, as to Substance matter, and
relevance, whereby by Compulsion, Pamela Veith is against in the Action of Criminal Coercion
by not only requesting this report, ad naseum in a harassing, and intimidating manner, but she
has implicated Court orders to do so, Constituting Fraud Upon the Court, and Criminal
Contempt, whereby the ability of this court to function has been impeded by said Actions.