Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Jordan’s Telecommunications
Industry
A look at the forces of the sector
January, 2009.
Done By:
Osama Zaidiah 2008 40 80 17
Esam Noufal 2007 xx xx xx
Safwat Shibly 2007 40 18 32
Wasef Takrouri 2008 40 80 02
Supervised by:
Dr. Talah Arabiyat
Jordan’s Telecommunication Industry
January, 2009
Contents
Contents.......................................................................................................................................... 2
2
Jordan’s Telecommunication Industry
January, 2009
1.Executive Summary
The ICT sector in Jordan has been growing rapidly in the last one and a half
decades. Starting in 1996 with the courageous entrepreneurship with Fastlink, the
sector has grown ever since with an impressive rate, exceeding the expectations of
everyone involved. This has led to new companies trying to take part in this sector,
and has witnessed the entrance of other competitive firms like Mobilecom (recently
acquired by Orange), Umniah, and Zain (Zain acquired Fastlink recently). This study
tries to look at the macroeconomic environment in Jordan, and then focuses on the
ICT sector using Porter’s five forces analysis. Finally it draws conclusions on the
market potential of the sector.
Based on our findings here, it is clear that the ICT sector in Jordan is an oligopoly
dominated by a few firms. This means that suppliers have a lot of power to
influence the market. In that light, it is government’s regulations and high
competition that is keeping the rights of the customers in place. Our research
concludes that government policies and licenses to the telecommunications
companies were very successful at preserving the rights of the customers and
keeping the market competitive at the same time.
3
Jordan’s Telecommunication Industry
January, 2009
3. Industry Analysis
1)Industry Development and Overview
The Telecommunication industry has been General Information at the end of 2007
regulated and initiated by the government since Telecommunications revenue 7.8% of GDP
the beginning in 1921 when the Department of
Post and Telegraph (DPT) was established to Information and communications technology
provide telegraph and post services to Trans 11% of GDP
Jordan Emirate. Companies operating in the
In 1992 the Ministry of Post, Telegraph and telecommunications sector earned a total of JD
Telephony (MoPTT) was renamed as The Ministry 920 million, which is 9.8 percent higher than
of Post & Communications. In 1993 Jordan the amount generated in 2006.
initiated a national development program to No. of subscribers 4.90 million in total, or a
increase the penetration of telephony services 83% penetration rate.
from 7.8 to 12 lines per 100 inhabitants. Jordan’s
telecommunications sector reform was launched Internet users reached 1.2 million
in 1994, where Jordan was the first Arab country Volume of investments in this industry totalled
to do so. JD 967 million over the last seven years (2001–
In 1994 Fastlink was granted the first mobile 2007).
cellular license in Jordan, and the new In 2002 the Ministry of Post and Communications
telecommunication environment in Jordan raised was renamed as the "Ministry of Information and
the demand to regulate the industry. Therefore,
in 1995 new Telecommunications Law issued Communications Technology (MoICT)". Also, the
providing the legal basis for reform. As a result, 2002 Telecom Law and its amendments
the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission emphasized on the independence of TRC, in
(TRC) was established. addition to entrusting the TRC with regulating
the Telecommunications and Information
In 1997, the Telecommunications Corporation Technology services in the Kingdom.
(TCC) was transformed into a Government-
owned company operating on a commercial In 2003 the Government Policy statement on the
basis, as a first step towards its privatization, Information & Communications Technology
and was then renamed Jordan sectors & Postal sector was issued, in pursuit of
Telecommunications Company (JTC). the implementation of Government obligations
towards the WTO to liberalize the
To break the monopoly in the industry, Telecommunications sector, which confirmed the
MobileCom Company was granted a license in government's intention to liberalize the fixed
1999 to provide mobile cellular services in the telecommunications sub-sector by the end of
Kingdom. 2004 and put an end to the duopoly of the two
Jordan became a full member of the WTO in mobile providers by the beginning of 2004.
2000. Where Jordan has provided its obligations In April 2003 XPress Company was granted the
regarding the telecommunications sector within first license to provide Radio Trunking services.
the presentations made to join the organization, In the same year, the TRC has published its
which included fully liberalizing the Program for Further Licensing within the Mobile
telecommunications sector by the end of 2004. Telecommunications Sub-sector, presented
In 2000, 40% of JTC shares were soled to a pursuant to the Statement of
consortium led by France Telecom and the Arab Government Policy on the ICT
Bank, and 8% to the Social Security Corporation, Sectors and Postal Sector.
and 1% to the Jordan Telecom Company In June 2004 the TRC published
employees. a public consultation on the
5
Jordan’s Telecommunication Industry
January, 2009
future licensing in the fixed telecom sub-sector Porter’s Five Forces Competitive Analysis is a
after its liberalization at the end of 2004. Based tool that was developed in 1979 by Micheal
on this, Umniah Company was granted a license Porter. The tool’s main goal is analyzing the
to provide mobile telephone services in the competitive environment in which a firm finds
same year. itself. The tool includes 5 main forces that should
be considered when analyzing a market. These
In October 2004, the Program of Licensing in
five forces are:
compliance with the Government Policy on the
ICT sectors and Postal Sector was issued, 1) Competitive Rivalry: This force indicator
whereby the program clarified the two considers the nature of suppliers in the
categories of licenses: individual and class, market. Are they all well developed and
which will be granted to those willing to invest in provide similar products or services of equal
the kingdom. quality? If so, the market is said to be
In the beginning of 2005 the last stages of the competitive. In this indicator we consider
National Numbering Plan were implemented in points like number of competitors, quality
regards to mobile telecommunications services differences, customer loyalty and good well…
by adding a new (8th) digit and by unifying the etc
code for all mobile services to be (07). 2) Supplier Power: This force indicator looks
In the beginning of 2005, the monopoly of Jordan at suppliers. Do they have great power over
Telecom Company in providing fixed telecom their customers? Can they change prices and
services was ended; and the fixed market was supply curves easily? If so, these suppliers are
fully opened. Consequently, Batelco company a force in the market.
was granted the first individual license allowing 3) Threat of Substitution: This force indicator
the company to provide fixed considers the services themselves. Are these
telecommunications services. In the same year services easy to substitute? Do customers
(26) licensees were transitioned into the new have other equally attractive options to
form of Class license in accordance with the consider? Would customers change the
Integrated Licensing and Regulatory Regime. product to cheaper ones?
In 2006, Fastlink, Umniah, and XPress companies 4) Buyer Power: This force indicator considers
transitioned to the Integrated Licensing and the demand side of a market. Are there only a
Regulatory Regime. few powerful buyers in the market? Could
2)Porter’s Five Forces Competitive these buyers greatly affect prices and
Analysis consumption rates?
5) Threat of New Entry: This force indicator
considers new suppliers. Is it easy for them to
enter the market? Are entry costs
manageable enough to allow a great number
of suppliers to enter the market?
We will limit our analysis to the Communications Industry in Jordan due to space limitations. The following
table summarizes our observations of the market:
Force Indicator Strength Comments
Competitive Very high All suppliers are well developed and highly competitive with a wide range of
Rivalry qualities
Supplier Power High Suppliers are really powerful in this industry. There strength is undermined due to
government regulations and competition.
Threat of Low Few services have the capability to substitute the mobile industry.
Substitution
Buyer Power Low/Mediu Buyers have very limited effects on demand since their numbers are huge and
m mobile have become a vital tool in the society.
Threat of new Low Also entry costs are high and costly.
entry
6
Jordan’s Telecommunication Industry
January, 2009
4. Recommendations
In this study we went through the main factors no competition, and mainly have great power of
underlying the ICT sector in Jordan. We started the market.
by going through a PEST analysis of Jordan, The market is, however, very closely monitored
coupled with vivid concentration on the ICT by the government. The regulation system from
sector. We then moved in into the sector, tracing the government, in other words the licenses
in its development throughout the years. given out by the government to the companies,
Finally, we conducted a rational Porter’s Analysis is the mainly the customers only shield against
of the sector while concentrating on the abuse. In that light it is clear that the Jordanian
Telecommunications part of the sector. Our government has contributed greatly to the
analysis of the sector indicates that the sector is sector’s growth and stability.
mainly an oligopoly, with few powerful firms that The sector however still includes the IT section.
control most of its markets, these firms are Zain, In expansion to this study one could analyze the
Orange, Umniah and the currently under IT sector as well, however, that is almost
shutting down Express. These firms face small to impossible to do here due to space limitations.
5. References